DOCSLIB.ORG

Distributed Operations in a Contested Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

C O R P O R A T I O N Distributed Operations in a Contested Environment Implications for USAF Force Presentation Miranda Priebe, Alan J. Vick, Jacob L. Heim, Meagan L. Smith For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2959 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0232-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Because of increasing air and missile threats to air bases, the Air Force is developing concepts to operate from a large number of small operating locations in a conflict with a near- peer competitor. This type of distributed air operations in a contested environment represents a significant shift in the way the Air Force has operated since the end of the Cold War. The Air Force therefore asked the RAND Corporation whether the Air Force needs to adjust how it presents forces to the joint commander. This report identifies capabilities the Air Force needs to carry out distributed operations in a contested environment. It then assesses whether the current force presentation model can provide these capabilities and how it compares with alternative models. The research reported here was commissioned by Maj Gen Brian Killough, Director of Strategic Plans, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategic Plans and Requirements, and conducted within the Strategy and Doctrine Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE as part of a FY 2018 project Distributed Operations. RAND Project AIR FORCE RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF), a division of the RAND Corporation, is the U.S. Air Force’s federally funded research and development center for studies and analyses. PAF provides the Air Force with independent analyses of policy alternatives affecting the development, employment, combat readiness, and support of current and future air, space, and cyber forces. Research is conducted in four programs: Strategy and Doctrine; Force Modernization and Employment; Manpower, Personnel, and Training; and Resource Management. Additional information about PAF is available on our website: www.rand.org/paf/ This report documents work originally shared with the U.S. Air Force on August 2, 2018. The draft report, issued on September 17, 2018, was reviewed by formal peer reviewers and U.S. Air Force subject-matter experts. iii Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................ iii Figures ............................................................................................................................................ vi Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vii Summary ...................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ xiv Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ xv 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Force Presentation ....................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 5 Report Organization .................................................................................................................... 8 2. Demand for Distributed Operations ............................................................................................ 9 Motivation for Distributed Basing ............................................................................................ 10 Motivation for Distributed Communications ............................................................................ 23 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 27 3. Protection .................................................................................................................................. 28 Capabilities for Protecting Against Air and Missile Attack ..................................................... 29 Capabilities for Protecting Against Ground Threats to Distributed Bases ............................... 34 Potential DOTMLPF-P Changes .............................................................................................. 42 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 45 4. Command and Control .............................................................................................................. 47 Disruptions to Command and Control in a Contested Environment ........................................ 48 Capabilities for Command and Control in a Contested Environment ...................................... 49 Potential DOTMLPF-P Changes .............................................................................................. 59 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 65 5. Sustainment ............................................................................................................................... 66 Disruptions to Sustainment in a Contested Environment ......................................................... 67 Capabilities for Sustainment in a Contested Environment ....................................................... 67 Potential DOTMLPF-P Solutions ............................................................................................. 72 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 78 6. Distributed Operations and Force Presentation ........................................................................ 79 Current Fighter Force Presentation Model for Employment .................................................... 79 Implications of Current and Alternative Air Force Approaches to Force Employment ........... 83 Force Presentation Priorities and the Operating Environment ................................................. 92 iv 7. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 94 Findings .................................................................................................................................... 94 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................... 96 Final Thoughts .......................................................................................................................... 99 References ................................................................................................................................... 101 v Figures Figure 2.1. Growing Reach and Inventory of Chinese Missiles ................................................... 12 Figure 2.2. Illustration of the Resilience Benefits of Distributing Aircraft Against Missile Attack ....................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 2.3. Summary of Alternative Types of Distributed Operating Locations ......................... 19 Figure 2.4. Notional Beddown with Three Distributed Basing Types ......................................... 20 Figure 2.5. Representative Communications Options at Various Ranges .................................... 25 Figure 2.6. Illustration of Aircraft Using LOS Datalink to Link Two Bases ............................... 27 Figure 4.1. Notional Depiction of U.S. and Allied Communications Pathways .......................... 50 Figure 4.2. Notional C2 Arrangement for Distributed Control of Fighter Forces ........................ 52 Figure 4.3. Notional Sector for a Conflict in the Pacific .............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Assessing the Training and Operational Proficiency of China's

    Assessing the Training and Operational Proficiency of China's

    C O R P O R A T I O N Assessing the Training and Operational Proficiency of China’s Aerospace Forces Selections from the Inaugural Conference of the China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI) Edmund J. Burke, Astrid Stuth Cevallos, Mark R. Cozad, Timothy R. Heath For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/CF340 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9549-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2016 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface On June 22, 2015, the China Aerospace Studies Institute (CASI), in conjunction with Headquarters, Air Force, held a day-long conference in Arlington, Virginia, titled “Assessing Chinese Aerospace Training and Operational Competence.” The purpose of the conference was to share the results of nine months of research and analysis by RAND researchers and to expose their work to critical review by experts and operators knowledgeable about U.S.
  • 1) ATQ Summer 2004

    1) ATQ Summer 2004

    CONTENTS… Association News Chairman’s Comments......................................................................... 2 President’s Message ............................................................................... 3 AIRLIFT TANKER QUARTERLY Volume 12 • Number 3 • Summer 2004 Secretary’s Notes ................................................................................... 3 Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published four times a year by the Airlift/Tanker Association, Col. Barry F. Creighton, USAF (Ret.), Secretary, Association Round-Up .......................................................................... 4 1708 Cavelletti Court, Virginia Beach, VA 23454. (757) 838-3037. Postage paid at Belleville, Illinois. Subscription rate: $30.00 per year. Change of address requires four weeks notice. Cover Story The Airlift/Tanker Association is a non-profit professional organization dedicated to providing a forum for people interested in improving the AMC: 12 Years of Excellence ......................................................... 6-17 capability of U.S. air mobility forces. Membership in the Airlift/Tanker Association is $30 annually A New Era in American Air Power Began on 1 June 1992 or $85 for three years. Full-time student membership is $10 per year. Life membership is $400. Corporate membership includes five individual memberships and is $1200 per year. Membership dues include a subscription to Departments Airlift/Tanker Quarterly, and are subject to change. Airlift/Tanker Quarterly is published for the use of the officers,
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
  • The American Legion [Volume 135, No. 3 (September 1993)]

    The American Legion [Volume 135, No. 3 (September 1993)]

    I THE AMERICAN \ %%>^^ Legiom^ FOR GOD AND COUNTRY September 1993 Two Dollars HOME SCHflOUHB, Going To School By Staying Home It's Warm, it's Hefty, it's Handsome and it's 100% Acrylic Easy Care! Grey Use this coupon and grab yourself a couple today! Cardigan Sweater Q5 2 for 49.50 3 for 74.00 HAB 24 4 for 98.50 lOOFainiew HABAND COMPANY Prospect Park 100 Fairview Ave., Prospect Park, N J 07530 Send 07530 I Regular Sizes: S(34-36) M{38-40) L(42-44) XL(46-4£ sweaters, *Big Men Sizes: Add $4 each for cable knit I Handsome have enclosed 2XL(50-52) 3XL(54-56) 4XL(58-60) both front and back WHAT HOW is an expensive fealLir purchase price plus $3.50 7A7-72C SIZE? MANY? an amazing low pi le Burgundy postage and handling. A ECRU Check Enclosed B GREY D BURGUNDY 1 CARD # Name . Mail Addr ;ss ' Apt. # City 1 State Zip The Magazine for a Strong America Vol. 135, No. 3 ARTICLES September 1993 RETiraNG GRADUALLY By Gordon Williams 18 VA RESEARCH: WE ALL SeiEHT AWxnt^ VA research has improvedAmericans' health, budget cuts now threaten thisprogram. By Ken Schamberg 22 TO SCHOOL BY STAYING AT I More and more parents believe they can succeed at home where schools havefailed. By Deidre Sullivan 25 To dramatize the dangers, activists have been playingfast and loose with the numbers. By Steve Salerno 28 THE GHOST PLANE FROM MINDANAO You may have the information to help solve this WWII mystery. FAMILY TIES: LONGER UVES Centenarians reveal the secret oftheir long and healthy lives.
  • 1 17A Stealth Fighter Organizations

    1 17A Stealth Fighter Organizations

    HISTORY AND LINEAGE OF THE F- 1 17A STEALTH FIGHTER ORGANIZATIONS DECEMBER 1991 SPECIAL STUDY HO-91-2 OFFICE OF HIST RY HEADQUARTERS, 37TH FPGHTER WING TWELFTH AIR FORCE TACTICAL AIR COMMAND INTRODUCTION In 1978, the Air Force awarded a full-scale development contract for the F-117A Stealth Fighter to Lockheed Corporation's Advanced Development Projects (the famous Skunk Works). Thirty- one months later, on 18 June 1981, the F-117A made its first flight. Meanwhile, the Tactical Air Command (TAC) decided to set up a group-level organization to guide the F-117A to an initial operating capability. That organization became the 4450th Tactical Group (TG), which officially activated on 15 October 1979 at Nellis AFB, Nevada. The 4450 TG began flying operations in 1981 from the Tonopah Test Range Airfield, located approximately 130 miles northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. Lockheed test pilots put the Stealth Fighter through its early paces. The 4450 TG also operated the A-7D as a surrogate trainer for the F-l17A, and these operations continued until 15 October 1982 under the guise of an avionics test mis- sion. October 15th is important to the program because on that date Maj Alton C. Whitley, Jr. became the first 4450 TG pilot to fly the F-117A. The 4450 TG then achieved an initial operating capability with the F-117A in October 1983. The 4450 TG's mission continued to evolve under a cloak of secrecy--all Tonopah training flights conducted at night under the cover of darkness--until late 1988. On 10 November 1988, the Air Force brought the F-117A from behind a "black veil" by publicly acknowledging its existence.
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century

    Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century

    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.

  • 15Th Wing Airmen Conduct Hurricane Irma Relief

    JBPHH anniversary special Oktoberfest meal What’s See page B-5 INSIDE PACAF hosts Pacific Air Want to clean Protect against flu Chiefs Symposium a fishpond? with yearly vaccination See pages A-3, A-5 See page B-3 See page B-3 September 29, 2017 www.issuu.com/navyregionhawaii www.hookelenews.com Volume 8 Issue 38 15th Wing Airmen conduct Hurricane Irma relief 1st Lt. Thomas Holland, a C-17 Globemaster III pilot with the 535th Airlift Squadron, performs a post-flight inspection Sept. 14, at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam. Story and photo by those efforts when a 535th Texas to pick up food and the load and be in and out St. Croix to assist munic- “We worked about 99 1st Lt. Avery Larkin Airlift Squadron (AS) crew water for Hurricane Irma as soon as possible.” ipal hurricane response. percent of what is allowed was sent to the Caribbean victims. The crew’s mission The crew also transported for flight duty,” he said. 15th Wing Public Affairs for hurricane response. Muro, a 535th AS in- was to take more than 27 medical personnel pro- “We’re tired, but it was Maj. Stewart Renz, structor loadmaster, re- 100,000 pounds of food viding assistance in St. great to be a part of such According to the De- Capt. Steven Pizzi, 1st Lt. called they arrived before and water to the Virgin Croix back to the United a massive team effort. partment of Defense, Thomas Holland, Tech. the cargo was prepared, Islands. They transported States. Members of all services more than 40,000 mem- Sgt.
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015

    National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report for FY2015

    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 (NGRER FY 2015) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2014 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Materiel and Facilities) COL Denise L. Loring, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $292,000 in Fiscal Years 2013–2014. Generated on 2014Feb28 RefID: 0-43F5A8A OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1500 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1500 FOREWORD The Reserve Component (RC) allows for expanded capacity and capability as a cost-effective part of the Total Force with global reach and flexibility. Since 2001, the RC has supported more than 875,000 mobilizations worldwide. Budgetary pressures will continue to require astute management of reduced resources to mitigate their effects. The RC provides capability and capacity at a reduced cost in a time of funding reductions across all components. The RC, when integrated as part of the operational force during armed conflict and peacetime, provides for a cost-effective force mix at acceptable levels of risk to support the defense strategy. The RC equipment levels are at some of the highest levels in history; however this era of postwar fiscal reductions will bring significant equipping challenges over the next several years. The Department has made strides in enhancing equipment transparency and accountability, but has not yet attained transparency into the Services procurement and distribution processes and outcomes. The Department must explore other options, such as separating the RC procurement funding, to meet the intent of the Commission on the National Guard and Reserve initiatives on equipping inadequacies between Active Component (AC) and RC.
  • Pushing a Pull System Transforming Marine Aviation Logistics Douglas S

    Pushing a Pull System Transforming Marine Aviation Logistics Douglas S

    LOGISTICS Pushing a Pull System Transforming Marine Aviation Logistics Douglas S. Steward by air, sea, or land. More is not always better, especially when it is the wrong stuff. Without improvements to ex- isting logistics doctrine, combatant commanders cannot leverage the full potential of their aviation weapon sys- tems. Additionally, with a greater presence of unmanned weapon systems, it makes sense that supporting logistics systems also place fewer personnel in harm’s way. The Marine Aviation Logistics Support Program is trans- forming to align with core doctrine changes and concepts such as distributed and prolonged operations, expedition- ary maneuver warfare, and sea basing. The goal of the new design, MALSP II, is to provide logistics support to deployed and non-deployed core capable units at higher levels of performance while also decreasing the infrastruc- ture and resource inventory. In January 2007, the Aviation Logistics Support Branch of Headquarters, Marine Corps, chartered the Aviation Logistics Transition Task Force and, in conjunction with Naval Air Systems Command, stood up the MALSP II Project Office to manage MALSP II improvements and program changes. Together, these activities form an architecture that identifies warfighting processes and relationships, relates systems to operational requirements, and describes standards and protocols. The architecture assists warfighters and program managers in communicating operational concepts to system develop- ers, and provides an analytic basis for discussions and decisions. The “As-Is” Design The current MALSP design is a “push” system that relies on subjective forecasts and anecdotal evidence to support its forces. This just-in-case approach has resulted in the following logistics support characteristics: • Days-of-usage depth • Fixed-allowanced resource packages • Heavy footprint • Reactive system.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    RESTRICTED 'FILE torY Report No. TO-346b Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared for use within the Bank and its affiliated organizations. They do not accept responsibility for its accuracy or completeness. The report may not be published nor may it be quoted as representing their views. INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Public Disclosure Authorized CUKUROVA ELECTRIC COMPANY PROJECT TURKEY Public Disclosure Authorized January 9, 1963 Public Disclosure Authorized Department of Technical Operations CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS 1 US $ = 9 Turkish Lira (TL) 1 TL = 11 US cents 1 million TL = 111, 111 US $ TURKEY CUKUROVA ELECTRIC COMPANY PROJECT Table of Contents Page No. SUMMARY i I. INTRODUCTION II. THE ELECTRIC POWER IThDUSTRY IN TURKEY Ownership and Government Controls Capacity and Use 2 Transmission 2 Program for Expansion 2 III. ORGANIZATION OF THE CUKUROVA ELECTRIC COMPANY 3 Management 3 Facilities 3 IV. THE POWER MvARKET IN THE CUKUROVA AREA 4 Sales and Capacity of CEC 4 Post Project Needs 4 Expansion Program 5 V. THE PROJECT 5 The Hydroelectric Unit 5 Description 5 Engineering and Procurement 6 Construction Schedules 6 The Engineering Studies 6 Cost Estimates 6 Justification 7 VI. FINANCIAL ASPECTS 7 Present Financial Position 9 Financial History 9 Assets and Depreciation 11 Past Earnings 11 Financing Plan 12 Estimated Future Earnings and Financial Position 13 VII. CONCLUSIONS Ai\D RECOMMENDATIONS 11 A1NEXES 1. Forecast of Energy Sales. 2. Forecast of Peak Loads. 3. Estimated Load Curve and Available and Proposed Capacities. 4. Estimate of Cost. 5. Condensed and Adjusted Balance Sheets 1958-1966. 6. Condensed and Adjusted Income Statements 1958-1966.
  • Joint Doctrine Note 1/16: Air Manoeuvre

    Joint Doctrine Note 1/16: Air Manoeuvre

    Joint Doctrine Note 1/16 Air Manoeuvre Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre Joint Doctrine Note 1/16 Air Manoeuvre Joint Doctrine Note (JDN) 1/16, dated September 2016, is promulgated as directed by the Chiefs of Staff Head Doctrine Conditions of release 1. This information is Crown copyright. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) exclusively owns the intellectual property rights for this publication. You are not to forward, reprint, copy, distribute, reproduce, store in a retrieval system, or transmit its information outside the MOD without VCDS’ permission. 2. This information may be subject to privately owned rights. JDN 1/16 i Authorisation The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) is responsible for publishing strategic trends, joint concepts and doctrine. If you wish to quote our publications as reference material in other work, you should confirm with our editors whether the particular publication and amendment state remains authoritative. We welcome your comments on factual accuracy or amendment proposals. Please send them to: The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre MOD Shrivenham, SWINDON, Wiltshire, SN6 8RF Telephone number: 01793 31 4216/4217/4220 Military Network: 96161 4216/4217/4220 E-mail: [email protected] All images, or otherwise stated are: © Crown copyright/MOD 2016. Distribution The distribution of Joint Doctrine Note (JDN) 1/16 is managed by the Forms and Publications Section, LCSLS Headquarters and Operations Centre, C16 Site, Ploughley Road, Arncott, Bicester, OX25 1LP. All of our other publications, including a regularly updated DCDC Publications Disk, can also be demanded from the LCSLS Operations Centre. LCSLS Help Desk: 01869 256197 Military Network: 94240 2197 Our publications are available to view and download on the Defence Intranet (RLI) at: http://defenceintranet.diif.r.mil.uk/Organisations/Orgs/JFC/Organisations/Orgs/ DCDC This publication is also available on the Internet at: www.gov.uk/mod/dcdc iiii JDN 1/16 Preface Purpose 1.
  • Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The

    Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The

    Each Cadet Squadron is sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below is the listing for the Cadet Squadron and the Sponsor Unit CS SPONSOR WING BASE MAJCOM 1 1st Fighter Wing 1 FW Langley AFB VA ACC 2 388th Fighter Wing 388 FW Hill AFB UT ACC 3 60th Air Mobility Wing 60 AMW Travis AFB CA AMC 4 15th Wing 15 WG Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam PACAF 5 12th Flying Training Wing 12 FTW Randolph AFB TX AETC 6 4th Fighter Wing 4 FW Seymour Johonson AFB NC ACC 7 49th Fighter Wing 49 FW Holloman AFB NM ACC 8 46th Test Wing 46 TW Eglin AFB FL AFMC 9 23rd Wing 23 WG Moody AFB GA ACC 10 56th Fighter Wing 56 FW Luke AFB AZ AETC 11 55th Wing AND 11th Wing 55WG AND 11WG Offutt AFB NE AND Andrews AFB ACC 12 325th Fighter Wing 325 FW Tyndall AFB FL AETC 13 92nd Air Refueling Wing 92 ARW Fairchild AFB WA AMC 14 412th Test Wing 412 TW Edwards AFB CA AFMC 15 355th Fighter Wing 375 AMW Scott AFB IL AMC 16 89th Airlift Wing 89 AW Andrews AFB MD AMC 17 437th Airlift Wing 437 AW Charleston AFB SC AMC 18 314th Airlift Wing 314 AW Little Rock AFB AR AETC 19 19th Airlift Wing 19 AW Little Rock AFB AR AMC 20 20th Fighter Wing 20 FW Shaw AFB SC ACC 21 366th Fighter Wing AND 439 AW 366 FW Mountain Home AFB ID AND Westover ARB ACC/AFRC 22 22nd Air Refueling Wing 22 ARW McConnell AFB KS AMC 23 305th Air Mobility Wing 305 AMW McGuire AFB NJ AMC 24 375th Air Mobility Wing 355 FW Davis-Monthan AFB AZ ACC 25 432nd Wing 432 WG Creech AFB ACC 26 57th Wing 57 WG Nellis AFB NV ACC 27 1st Special Operations Wing 1 SOW Hurlburt Field FL AFSOC 28 96th Air Base Wing AND 434th ARW 96 ABW