WT/CFMC/W/64 15 October 2015 (15-5417) Page: 1/6 Original

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WT/CFMC/W/64 15 October 2015 (15-5417) Page: 1/6 Original WT/CFMC/W/64 15 October 2015 (15-5417) Page: 1/6 Original: French DIRECTOR-GENERAL'S CONSULTATIVE FRAMEWORK MECHANISM ON COTTON COTTON PROJECT Communication from Benin The following communication, dated 17 September 2015, is being circulated at the request of the delegation of Benin. _______________ The Permanent Mission of the Republic of Benin is submitting the project below, prepared by the Government of Benin, with a view to receiving technical and financial assistance from the cotton sector development partners in the framework of the Director-General's Consultative Framework Mechanism on Cotton. 1 PROJECT FOR THE REORGANIZATION OF THE COTTON SECTOR THROUGH ZONING IN BENIN 1.1 Context and justification 1.1. The Government of Benin has opted for an economic growth policy involving the diversification of agricultural activities. Hence the country's strategic development orientations and its growth strategy for poverty reduction in which the agricultural sector serves as a lever in the fight against poverty. The Strategic Plan to Revive the Agricultural Sector (PSRSA) 2011-2015, whose priority focus is the promotion of agricultural activities, calls for the development of 13 subsectors, which include cotton. 1.2. Indeed, for some 30 years now the cotton sector has played a leading role in the national economy. As the leading creator of wealth and jobs, it is one of the pillars of economic growth in Benin and is vital to the improvement of rural household income. Cotton represents 13.5% of Benin's agricultural production and accounts for 5% of the value added of the industrial sector and 33% of exports. 1.3. In spite of this potential and in spite of the reforms introduced in accordance with the country's economic policies, there has been a downward trend in domestic production since 2010. Having reached a peak of 427,156 tonnes of seed cotton during the record season of 2004-2005, annual cotton production fell below 200,000 tonnes during the 2009-2010 season, bottoming out at 136,958 tonnes at the end of the 2010-2011 season, in spite of the implementation of the Project to Improve and Boost the Cotton Sector in Benin (PARFCB). 1.4. This fall in production in one of the leading sectors of the national economy led to a sharp decline in domestic resources and export revenue, coupled with the negative impact of a decline in income affecting above all the rural areas and the small producers. At the same time, a number of inefficiencies emerged in the cotton sector during the 2011-2012 season. WT/CFMC/W/64 - 2 - 1.5. Reacting to this situation, the State provisionally resumed control, as from the 2012-2013 season, over the management of the cotton sector pursuant to the decisions adopted by the Council of Ministers on 29 April 2012, namely: (i) repeal of the decree on the transfer to private operators of responsibility for organizing consultations on the supply of agricultural inputs, and (ii) suspension of the framework agreement between the State and the AIC (Interprofessional Cotton Association). The objective was to regain the confidence of cotton farmers and to restore cotton production. 1.6. In spite of the problems inherent in operationalizing the palliative mechanism that characterized the former interprofessional management structures, seed cotton production progressed significantly, reaching 240,028 tonnes in 2012-2013, 307,355 tonnes in 2013-2014, and already more than 380,000 tonnes for 2014-2015. 1.7. In order to maintain this growth trend, a new, inclusive institutional framework will have to be set up to manage the sector. 1.8. Hence the project for the reorganization of the cotton sector, intended to bring about a comprehensive and extensive reform that can bring together all of the cotton sector stakeholders in an effort to strengthen a sector whose impact on economic growth has been amply demonstrated. 1.2 Potential action areas and target groups 1.9. In principle, the project covers the entire country, but should focus its activities on the cotton producing areas, i.e. mainly the regions of Alibori, Borgu, Atacora, Donga, Collines, Zou and a few communes in South Benin. 1.10. The target groups are: the producers, the distributers of inputs, the ginners, the traders and the State. 1.11. In the context of the reorganization of the cotton sector, the target groups are the different stakeholders in the sector, in particular the producers (National Federation of Village Cooperatives of Cotton Producers); the ginners; the oil extractors; the spinners; the importers/distributors of inputs; and the transporters. 1.3 Objectives 1.3.1 Overall objective 1.12. The overall objective of the project is to secure the development of the cotton sector in Benin. 1.3.2 Specific objectives 1.13. The specific objectives are: a. to create a sustainable participative/inclusive management framework for the sector; b. to improve productivity and production to cover the processing capacities of the ginning plants in Benin; c. to introduce a permanent transparency and traceability mechanism so as to ensure a fair redistribution of income to the different stakeholders groups; d. to create favourable conditions for improved local processing of cotton products. WT/CFMC/W/64 - 3 - 1.3.3 Results 1.14. The main results to be expected are: a. For the producers: i. availability and accessibility of quality inputs; ii. reinforcement of the professional organization; iii. guaranteed involvement of producers in decision making at every stage of the process; iv. guaranteed inclusion of producers among the shareholders of the semi-private and private ginning companies; v. availability of crop loans; vi. increase in producers' output and income. b. For the ginners: i. increase in raw materials and income; ii. proper conditions for ginning and decent sale prices; iii. guaranteed transparency in the management of the cotton sector. c. For the State: i. re-establishment of the State's authority in the management of the sector; ii. renewed confidence among the different stakeholder groups; iii. guaranteed representation of all of the players in the sector's interprofessional organization; iv. increased production and improved productivity; v. increase in the income of stakeholders; vi. improved processing of cotton products; vii. availability of a producer income support mechanism. 1.4 Overview of zoning and the role of the different players 1.15. In order to meet the objective of ensuring a balance among production zones without disregarding the specificities, we propose the four following zones: Zone 1: Banikoara, Ségbana, Karimama, Malanville, Kandi and Gogounou Estimated production potential: 156,000 tonnes. Total ginning capacity: 88,000 tonnes (one plant in Benikoara and two plants in Kandi). WT/CFMC/W/64 - 4 - Zone 2: Bembèrèkè, Kalalé, Nikki, Pèrèrè, Tchaourou, Parakou, Sinendé and N'Dali Estimated production potential: 85,000 tonnes. Total ginning capacity: 250,000 tonnes (one plant in Bembèrèkè, one plant in Nikki, one plant in N'Dali and three plants in Parakou). Zone 3: Kouandé, Tanguiéta, Péhunco, Matéri, Cobly, Ouaké, Boukoumbé, Toucountuna, Kérou, Natitingou, Copargo, Djougou and Bassila Estimated production potential: 82,000 tonnes. Total ginning capacity: 25,000 tonnes (one plant in Péhunco). Zone 4: Ouèssè, Bantè, Savalou, Glazoué, Savè, Dassa, Bohicon, Abomey, Agbangnizoun, Zagnanado, Djidja, Covè, ZaKpota, Aplahoué, Djakotomey, Dogbo, Klouékanmé, Lalo, Toviklin, Lokossa, Kétou, Pobè and Adja-Ouèrè Estimated production potential: 60,800 tonnes. Total ginning capacity: 224,500 tonnes (two plants in Savalou, one plant in Glazoué, one plant in Paouignan, two plants in Bohicon, one plant in Avogbanna, one plant in Kétou, one plant in Hagoumé). 1.16. Roles and responsibilities will be shared between the State and the players involved in the new organization of the sector as follows: a. The role of the State will be to ensure: i. the maintenance of rural tracks by introducing an appropriate mechanism involving contributions from all of the sector's stakeholders; ii. the introduction of an efficient agricultural extension/advisory system; iii. the development of research work; iv. the production, certification and distribution of cotton seed with the establishment of a new ginning and delinting plant; v. the control and certification of phytosanitary products; vi. certification of the price of seed cotton; vii. quality control of seed cotton; viii. quality control and classification of cotton fibre; ix. the permanent monitoring of compliance with the rules and regulations of the sector; x. the introduction of an income support mechanism; xi. the follow-up of the organization of primary marketing; xii. the collection and production of statistics. b. The private stakeholders, including the producers, will have the following role: i. production of seed cotton; ii. marketing of seed cotton; WT/CFMC/W/64 - 5 - iii. production, importation and distribution of inputs; iv. transport; v. ginning; vi. spinning, weaving; vii. oil extraction and any other forms of processing of seed cotton and byproducts; viii. marketing of finished products; ix. more generally, the supply to the sector of goods and services that are unconnected to government services. c. In addition, the States and private operators will be sharing the following functions (non-exclusive): i. funding of cotton research; ii. maintenance of rural tracks; iii. follow-up/support/advice for producers; iv. setting seed cotton prices; v. follow-up/evaluation. 1.5 Implementation strategy 1.17. An organizational mechanism has been set up to implement the project to reorganize the cotton sector, and a road map has been prepared. 1.18. Specifically, a production zone will be assigned to a cotton company responsible for the promotion and regional development of the cotton sector, based on an agreement with the State in conformity with the institutional framework for the management of the cotton sector in the Republic of Benin. It is clear, however, that the success of the zoning will require political will on the part of the government, the cooperation of stakeholders, and permanent consultations.
Recommended publications
  • B E N I N Benin
    Birnin o Kebbi !( !( Kardi KANTCHARIKantchari !( !( Pékinga Niger Jega !( Diapaga FADA N'GOUMA o !( (! Fada Ngourma Gaya !( o TENKODOGO !( Guéné !( Madécali Tenkodogo !( Burkina Faso Tou l ou a (! Kende !( Founogo !( Alibori Gogue Kpara !( Bahindi !( TUGA Suroko o AIRSTRIP !( !( !( Yaobérégou Banikoara KANDI o o Koabagou !( PORGA !( Firou Boukoubrou !(Séozanbiani Batia !( !( Loaka !( Nansougou !( !( Simpassou !( Kankohoum-Dassari Tian Wassaka !( Kérou Hirou !( !( Nassoukou Diadia (! Tel e !( !( Tankonga Bin Kébérou !( Yauri Atakora !( Kpan Tanguiéta !( !( Daro-Tempobré Dammbouti !( !( !( Koyadi Guilmaro !( Gambaga Outianhou !( !( !( Borogou !( Tounkountouna Cabare Kountouri Datori !( !( Sécougourou Manta !( !( NATITINGOU o !( BEMBEREKE !( !( Kouandé o Sagbiabou Natitingou Kotoponga !(Makrou Gurai !( Bérasson !( !( Boukombé Niaro Naboulgou !( !( !( Nasso !( !( Kounounko Gbangbanrou !( Baré Borgou !( Nikki Wawa Nambiri Biro !( !( !( !( o !( !( Daroukparou KAINJI Copargo Péréré !( Chin NIAMTOUGOU(!o !( DJOUGOUo Djougou Benin !( Guerin-Kouka !( Babiré !( Afekaul Miassi !( !( !( !( Kounakouro Sheshe !( !( !( Partago Alafiarou Lama-Kara Sece Demon !( !( o Yendi (! Dabogou !( PARAKOU YENDI o !( Donga Aledjo-Koura !( Salamanga Yérémarou Bassari !( !( Jebba Tindou Kishi !( !( !( Sokodé Bassila !( Igbéré Ghana (! !( Tchaourou !( !(Olougbé Shaki Togo !( Nigeria !( !( Dadjo Kilibo Ilorin Ouessé Kalande !( !( !( Diagbalo Banté !( ILORIN (!o !( Kaboua Ajasse Akalanpa !( !( !( Ogbomosho Collines !( Offa !( SAVE Savé !( Koutago o !( Okio Ila Doumé !(
    [Show full text]
  • Update Choléra
    Benin Update Choléra 22 Septembre 2016 @UNICEF Benin 2016 Benin @UNICEF Du 9 août au 22 septembre 2016, au total, 508 cas ont été enregistrés au Bénin dont 10 décès soit une létalité de 1,96 %. A ce jour, 13 communes sur 77 et 6 départements sur 12 sont touchés. Cas Décès 1er Septembre +25 cas avec 22 à Cotonou, 2 à Abomey-Calavi et 1 cas à Allada 1 2 Septembre +22 cas avec17 à Cotonou, 4 à Abomey-Calavi et 1 à So-Ava 1 3 Septembre +21 cas avec 19 à Cotonou, 1 à Allada, 1 à So-Ava et 1 à Abomey 0 4 Septembre + 22 cas; 14 à Cotonou, 7 à Abomey-Calavi, et 1 à Parakou 0 5 Septembre + 26 cas; 24 à Cotonou, 1 à Abomey-Calavi, et 1 à Ouidah 0 6 Septembre + 10 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 7 Septembre + 8 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 8 Septembre + 20 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 9 Septembre + 12 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 10 Septembre + 12 cas; avec 11 à Cotonou et 1 à Ndali(Borgou) 0 11 Septembre + 14 cas; Cotonou seulement 1 12 Septembre + 4 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 13 Septembre + 3 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 14 Septembre + 3 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 15 Septembre + 4 cas; Cotonou seulement 0 16 Septembre + 6 cas; 5 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 17 Septembre + 12 cas; 6 à Cotonou, 2 à Abomey-calavi et 4 à Savalou 0 18 Septembre + 15 cas; 12 à Cotonou et 3 à Savalou 0 19 Septembre + 13 cas; 12 à Cotonou et 1 à Abomey-calavi 0 20 Septembre + 6 cas; 5 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 21 Septembre + 10 cas; 9 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 22 Septembre + 8 cas; 7 à Cotonou et 1 à Savalou 0 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Étrangère Dans L'alibori Synthèse Des Principaux Résult
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN ------------------- MINISTERE DU PLAN ET DU DEVELOPPEMENT ------------------- Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Economique Synthèse des principaux résultats du RGPH-4 de l’ALIBORI 1- Etat et structure de la population de l’Alibori Evolution de la population de l’Alibori de 2002 à 2013 Taux d'accroissement Poids DIVISIONS RGPH4-2013 RGPH3-2002 intercensitaire démographique ADMINISTRATIVES en % (2002- en % en 2013 Total Masculin Féminin Total Masculin Féminin 2013) BENIN 10 008 749 4 887 820 5 120 929 6 769 914 3 284 119 3 485 795 3,52 ALIBORI 867 463 431 357 436 106 521 093 259 588 261 505 4,61 8,7 Banikoara 246 575 122 445 124 130 152 028 75 829 76 199 4,37 28,4 Gogounou 117 523 58 018 59 505 80 013 39 759 40 254 3,46 13,5 Kandi 179 290 88 998 90 292 95 206 47 600 47 606 5,76 20,7 Karimama 66 353 33 149 33 204 39 579 19 792 19 787 4,68 7,6 Malanville 168 641 83 681 84 960 101 628 50 263 51 365 4,58 19,4 Ségbana 89 081 45 066 44 015 52 639 26 345 26 294 4,77 10,3 En 2013, le département de l’Alibori compte 867 463 habitants soit 8,7% Evolution (en %) de la structure par âge de la population de l'Alibori au RGPH-1992, RGPH-2002 25,0 de la population béninoise. Le taux et RGPH-2013 1992 2002 2013 d’accroissement intercensitaire de 20,0 On constate depuis 1992 une 4,61% est supérieur à la moyenne augmentation de la proportion de la nationale.
    [Show full text]
  • S a Rd in Ia
    M. Mandarino/Istituto Euromediterraneo, Tempio Pausania (Sardinia) Land07-1Book 1.indb 97 12-07-2007 16:30:59 Demarcation conflicts within and between communities in Benin: identity withdrawals and contested co-existence African urban development policy in the 1990s focused on raising municipal income from land. Population growth and a neoliberal environment weakened the control of clans and lineages over urban land ownership to the advantage of individuals, but without eradicating the importance of personal relationships in land transactions or of clans and lineages in the political structuring of urban space. The result, especially in rural peripheries, has been an increase in land aspirations and disputes and in their social costs, even in districts with the same territorial control and/or the same lines of nobility. Some authors view this simply as land “problems” and not as conflicts pitting locals against outsiders and degenerating into outright clashes. However, decentralization gives new dimensions to such problems and is the backdrop for clashes between differing perceptions of territorial control. This article looks at the ethnographic features of some of these clashes in the Dahoman historic region of lower Benin, where boundaries are disputed in a context of poorly managed urban development. Such disputes stem from land registries of the previous but surviving royal administration, against which the fragile institutions of the modern state seem to be poorly equipped. More than a simple problem of land tenure, these disputes express an internal rejection of the legitimacy of the state to engage in spatial structuring based on an ideal of co-existence; a contestation that is put forward with the de facto complicity of those acting on behalf of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Cage Project Final Evaluation 2001-2005
    COMMUNITY ACTION FOR GIRLS EDUCATION WORLD LEARNING / USAID CAGE PROJECT FINAL EVALUATION 2001-2005 June 2005 Justin DONGBEHOUNDE François GAUTHO Consultants CONTENTS Pages 0- SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 I- BACKGROUND 5 II- OBJECTIVES AND EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES 5 III- EVALUATION PROBLEMS 7 IV- EVALUATION RESULTATS 7 1. Level of results achievement and objectives 7 2. Analysis of the approach, strategies and stakeholders 17 3. Management and coordination of the project 19 4. Sustainability durability and replication of the experience 20 5. Strengths and weaknesses of the project 21 V- CONCLUSIONS 22 VI- RECOMMENDATIONS 23 VII- APPENDICES 24 CAGE project final evaluation O- SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions · The four objectives set are met both quantitatively and qualitatively. · The starting hypothesis of the project, that well stimulated community participation could lead to better results in the promotion of girls education is verified and it is correct. In fact, CAGE project has succeeded in arousing a high community mobilization and a strong commitment of CRL (Local representative Committees) and CCEF with meaningful results in their quantity and quality, in their dimension and depth. · This ability to stimulate the local/social support and mobilization comes from CAGE approach that is the entire process and steps leading to the set up of CRL and CCEF, the vision analysis and strategies, up to the micro project funding, all this back up with a very good social communication. · In this process, the set up of CRL and their composition played an important role. Truly the intension is a representative committee. Initially the social communication showed that members would be like pioneers, with no specific advantages, but more sacrifices and a lot of work to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Ketou
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN =-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-= MINISTERE DE LA PROSPECTIVE, DU DEVELOPPEMENT ET DE L’EVALUATION DE L’ACTION PUBLIQUE (MPDEAP) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA STATISTIQUE ET DE L’ANALYSE ECONOMIQUE (INSAE) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= MONOGRAPHIE DE LA COMMUNE DE KETOU DIRECTION DES ETUDES DEMOGRAPHIQUES Décembre 2008 TABLE DES MATIERES LISTE DES TABLEAUX ............................................................................................................ vi LISTE DES GRAPHIQUES ........................................................................................................ x PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................... xi NOTE METHODOLOGIQUE SUR LE RGPH-3 .................................................................. xiii SITUATION GEOGRAPHIQUE DE KETOU DANS LE BENIN .......................................... 1 SITUATION GEOGRAPHIQUE DE LA COMMUNE DE KETOU DANS LE DEPARTEMENT DU PLATEAU ............................................................................................... 2 1- GENERALITES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1-1 Présentation de la commune .................................................................................................. 3 1-1-1 Le relief ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-Cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin”
    Project evaluation series Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin” Project evaluation series Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of persistent organic pollutants and obsolete pesticides and strengthening life-cycle management of pesticides in Benin” GCP/BEN/056/GFF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin”. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport Pays Benin
    Rapport de Mission EVALUATION DE LA PRISE EN CHARGE DE LA MALNUTRITION AIGUË BENIN UNICEF WCARO 13 – 26 Février 2010 Hélène Schwartz – Yvonne Grellety (Relecture Célestin Katumwa) REMERCIEMENTS Nous voudrions adresser nos sincères remerciements à la Directeur de la Santé Familiale du Ministère de la Santé et en particulier toute l’équipe du Service de Nutrition pour nous avoir facilité notre séjour au Bénin, et en particulier Dr Gbetchedji Bernard et Dr Cyriaque Gnintoungbe. Nous tenons à adresser un remerciement particulier à toutes les personnes des Zones Sanitaires, que ce soit les médecins coordinateurs de zone ou les points focaux nutrition (Chargé de Recherche à l’Appui de la Mobilisation Sociale) et tout le personnel des structures de santé qui nous ont accompagnés durant les visites de centres et partagés les informations sur les activités de nutrition dans le département de l’Alibori. Nous tenons à remercier très sincèrement le bureau UNICEF Bénin et notamment Anne Sophie Le Dain et Félicien Agossou Sagbadja pour leur accueil chaleureux et l’organisation de nos visites sur le terrain. TABLES DES MATIERES REMERCIEMENTS 2 TABLES DES MATIERES 3 ACRONYMES 4 INTRODUCTION 5 1. CONTEXTE 5 2. METHODOLOGIE 5 3. SYSTEME DE SANTE AU BENIN 6 Organisation du système de santé 6 Le service de nutrition 7 Système National d’Information et de Gestion Sanitaire (SNIGS) 7 PRISE EN CHARGE INTEGREE DE LA MALNUTRITION AIGUË (PECIMA) 7 1. FINANCEMENT DE LA PECIMA 7 2. REVISION DU PROTOCOLE NATIONAL 8 VISITE TERRAIN 9 1. Centres Nutritionnels Thérapeutiques (CNT) 10 2. Centres Nutritionnels Ambulatoires (CNA) 11 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Des Départements Du Zou Et Des Collines
    Spatialisation des cibles prioritaires des ODD au Bénin : Monographie des départements du Zou et des Collines Note synthèse sur l’actualisation du diagnostic et la priorisation des cibles des communes du département de Zou Collines Une initiative de : Direction Générale de la Coordination et du Suivi des Objectifs de Développement Durable (DGCS-ODD) Avec l’appui financier de : Programme d’appui à la Décentralisation et Projet d’Appui aux Stratégies de Développement au Développement Communal (PDDC / GIZ) (PASD / PNUD) Fonds des Nations unies pour l'enfance Fonds des Nations unies pour la population (UNICEF) (UNFPA) Et l’appui technique du Cabinet Cosinus Conseils Tables des matières 1.1. BREF APERÇU SUR LE DEPARTEMENT ....................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1. INFORMATIONS SUR LES DEPARTEMENTS ZOU-COLLINES ...................................................................................... 6 1.1.1.1. Aperçu du département du Zou .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1. GRAPHIQUE 1: CARTE DU DEPARTEMENT DU ZOU ............................................................................................... 7 1.1.1.2. Aperçu du département des Collines .................................................................................................. 8 3.1.2. GRAPHIQUE 2: CARTE DU DEPARTEMENT DES COLLINES .................................................................................... 10 1.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of the Inter Tropical Front and Rainy Season Onset in Benin
    Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 24(2): 1-15, 2017; Article no.CJAST.36832 Previously known as British Journal of Applied Science & Technology ISSN: 2231-0843, NLM ID: 101664541 Dynamics of the Inter Tropical Front and Rainy Season Onset in Benin Julien Djossou1,2*, Aristide B. Akpo1,2, Jules D. Afféwé3, Venance H. E. Donnou1,2, Catherine Liousse4, Jean-François Léon4, Fidèle G. Nonfodji1,2 and Cossi N. Awanou1,2 1Département de Physique (FAST), Formation Doctorale Sciences des Matériaux (FDSM), Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Bénin. 2Laboratoire de Physique du Rayonnement LPR, FAST-UAC, 01 BP 526 Cotonou, Bénin. 3Institut National de L’eau (INE), Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Bénin. 4Laboratoire d’Aérologie (LA), Toulouse, France. Authors’ contributions This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Author ABA designed the study and wrote the protocol. Authors JD and JDA performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Authors CL, JFL and CNA managed the analyses of the study. Authors VHED and FGN managed the literature searches. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/CJAST/2017/36832 Editor(s): (1) Ndongo Din, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Cameroon, Africa. Reviewers: (1) Eresanya Emmanuel Olaoluwa, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria. (2) Brigadier Libanda, The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. (3) J. S. Ojo, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria. (4) Mojolaoluwa Daramola, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history/21496 Received 19th September 2017 Accepted 13th October 2017 Original Research Article Published 20th October 2017 ABSTRACT Rainfall onset in Benin is one of the major problems that the farmers face.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report Standard Format
    ÉVALUATIONS A POSTERIORI DES PROJETS FINANCÉS PAR LE FONDS DES NATIONS UNIES POUR LA DÉMOCRATIE Contrat NO.PD:C0110/10 RAPPORT D’ÉVALUATION UDF-BEN-09-287- Participation citoyenne pour l’amélioration de la gouvernance locale (Bénin) Date: 20 Janvier 2014 Executive Summary in English Remerciements L’équipe responsable de la mission remercie tous les membres d’ALCRER qui ont contribué avec dévouement et disponibilité au bon déroulement de l’organisation de cette mission de terrain au Benin. L’équipe remercie en particulier Martin ASSOGBA, Président d’ALCRER ainsi que Gervais LOKO et GANDEMEY Luc, consultants chargés de l’exécution et du suivi du projet, qui ont facilité les principaux contacts à Cotonou et dans les communes de Ouinhi, Bohicon, Abomey dans le Département du Zou et dans les Communes de Houéyogbé et de Lokossa dans le Département du Mono-Couffo. Ils ont pu rester disponibles et en contact régulier avec les consultants pendant la phase cruciale de rédaction du présent rapport. Les évaluateurs souhaitent également remercier tous les acteurs, intervenants et bénéficiaires qui ont participé à ce processus d’évaluation, qui ont accepté d’être disponibles et de partager leurs expériences et réflexions. Décharge Le contenu de la présente publication relève de la seule responsabilité des évaluateurs et ne peut en aucun cas être considéré comme reflétant l’avis du FNUD, Transtec ou d’autres institutions et/ou personnes mentionnées dans ce rapport. Auteurs Ce rapport est rédigé par Florence Burban, Ignace Djenontin et Aurélie Ferreira qui a fourni les conseils méthodologiques et éditoriaux et assuré le contrôle qualité avec le support du responsable Evaluation.
    [Show full text]