The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments. Acknowledgments iii 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 3 11/29/17 3:34 PM 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 4 11/29/17 3:34 PM Abbreviations and Acronyms AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome CGIAR Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research CMU Country Management Unit ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EMC Continuous Multi-Sectoral Survey (Enquête Multisectorielle Continue) EMICOV Integrated Modular Household Well-Being Survey (Enquête Modulaire Intégrée sur les Conditions de Vie des Ménages) ENV Household Living Standards Survey (Enquête sur le Niveau de Vie des Ménages) FAO Food and Agriculture Organization PFR Rural Land Plans (Plans Fonciers Ruraux) FEWSNET Famine Early Warning Systems Network GADM Global Administrative Area Database GDP Gross Domestic Product HI Herfindahl Index HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus ICT Information and Communication Technology IFPRI International Food Policy Research Institute LMI Low and Middle Income NEG New Economic Geography OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PAD Project Appraisal Document PFR Rural Land Use Plan (Plan Foncier Rural) PID Project Information Document PPP Purchasing Power Parity QUIBB Basic Well-Being Indicator Questionnaire (Questionnaire des Indicateurs de Base du Bien-être) R&D Research and Development SCD Systematic Country Diagnostic SHIP Survey-Based Harmonized Indicators Program SMS Short Message Service SSA Sub-Saharan Africa TFP Total Factor Productivity UN United Nations WAEMU West African Economic and Monetary Union WDI World Development Indicator Abbreviations and Acronyms v 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 5 11/29/17 3:34 PM 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 6 11/29/17 3:34 PM Table of Contents Acknowledgments . iii Abbreviations and Acronyms . .v Executive Summary . .xi Chapter 1: Location and Prosperity . 1. Motivation and Objectives ............................................................... 2 Regional Context ....................................................................... 3 Data . 4 Chapter 2: Geography of Welfare—Three Building Blocks . 7 Natural Endowment ....................................................................8 Agglomeration Economies ...............................................................11 Market Access ..........................................................................12 Chapter 3: Spatial Disparities in Welfare and Poverty . 15 Leading and Lagging Areas ...............................................................17 Poverty Rates, Poverty Mass, and Poverty Density ........................................20 Access to Services .....................................................................23 Quality of Life and Characteristics of Poor People .........................................26 Chapter 4: Geographical Differences in Agricultural Activity . 32 Employment in Agriculture . .35 Agricultural Productivity ................................................................36 Assets, Inputs, and Output Markets .....................................................43 Chapter 5: Putting It All Together . 48 Relationship between Welfare and Agricultural Productivity ................................49 Three Sets of Explanatory Variables for Three Building Blocks ..............................50 Correlates of Welfare ....................................................................51 Correlates of Agricultural Productivity ...................................................53 Chapter 6: Policy Recommendations and Further Studies . .56 Urbanization...........................................................................57 Agricultural Productivity ................................................................58 Fiscal Transfers ........................................................................59 Safety Net Programs ...................................................................60 Limitations and Further Studies .........................................................60 References . 63 Table of Contents vii 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 7 11/29/17 3:34 PM Appendix A: Agroecological Zones . 68 Appendix B: Market Accessibility Index—Methodology . 71 Appendix C: Extra Materials . 73. Appendix D: Summary of Findings on Agricultural Activities across Countries, by Zone . 83 Appendix E: Agricultural Data—Notes on Model Construction . 85 Maps, Tables, Figures, and Boxes Map 1.1: Climate Classification ...............................................................3 Map 2.1: Abundant in Terms of Precipitation Levels ........................................... 9 Map 2.2: Agroecological Zones, by Country ...................................................10 Map 2.3: Concentration of Agglomeration Economies in the South .............................12 Map 2.4: Road Networks ...................................................................13 Map 2.5: Concentration of High Market Access in the South, around Capitals and Economic Capitals .....................................................................14 Map 3.1: Cluster of Leading Areas in the South, around the Capitals and the Economic Capitals, or along Country Borders ...................................................................17 Map 3.2: In Three out of Four Countries, the North is Remarkably Poorer than the South .........21 Map 3.3: Lower Poverty Rates in Areas around the Capitals and the Economic Capitals, and along the Country Border...............................................................21 Map 3.4: High Poverty Density in and around the Capitals and the Economic Capitals, and in the South.......................................................................... 23 Map 3.5: High Variation in Access to Public Services across Space (except cellphone coverage) ... 25 Map 3.6: Low Service Coverage in Areas with High Poverty Incidence ..........................26 Map 3.7: Higher Diversity in Food Consumption Basket and Lower Food Share from Own Production in the South . 27 Map 3.8: Variation in Key Food Consumed across Space ......................................28 Map 4.1: Employment in Agriculture Relative to Other Sectors ................................35 Map 4.2: Cash Crops across Agroecological Zones............................................39 Map 4.3: Cash Crops across Côte d’Ivoire’s Agroecological Zones ..............................40 Map 4.4: Maize Yields across Agroecological Zones............................................41 Map 4.5: Cash Crop Yields across Agroecological Zones ...................................... 42 Map 4.6: Use of Inputs and Farm Land across Agroecological Zones ........................... 44 Map 4.7: Land Tenure Security across Agroecological Zones...................................46 Map 4.8: Sale of Agricultural Produce........................................................47 Table 1.1: Economic per Capita Growth by International Standards...............................4 Table 1.2: Geographical Data Sources ........................................................ 6 Table 3.1: Better Housing Conditions for Poor Households in Urban Areas or in Favorable Agroecological Zones......................................................................29 Table 3.2: Fewer Family Members, Lower Dependency Rates, More Likely to be Female-Headed Households, and Less Likely to Have No Education among Poor Households in Urban Areas and Favorable Zones ......................................................................30 Table 5.1: Statistical Summary ..............................................................51 viii The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 8 11/29/17 3:34 PM Table 5.2: Factors Associated with Spatial Differences in Poverty: Coastal
Recommended publications
  • B E N I N Benin
    Birnin o Kebbi !( !( Kardi KANTCHARIKantchari !( !( Pékinga Niger Jega !( Diapaga FADA N'GOUMA o !( (! Fada Ngourma Gaya !( o TENKODOGO !( Guéné !( Madécali Tenkodogo !( Burkina Faso Tou l ou a (! Kende !( Founogo !( Alibori Gogue Kpara !( Bahindi !( TUGA Suroko o AIRSTRIP !( !( !( Yaobérégou Banikoara KANDI o o Koabagou !( PORGA !( Firou Boukoubrou !(Séozanbiani Batia !( !( Loaka !( Nansougou !( !( Simpassou !( Kankohoum-Dassari Tian Wassaka !( Kérou Hirou !( !( Nassoukou Diadia (! Tel e !( !( Tankonga Bin Kébérou !( Yauri Atakora !( Kpan Tanguiéta !( !( Daro-Tempobré Dammbouti !( !( !( Koyadi Guilmaro !( Gambaga Outianhou !( !( !( Borogou !( Tounkountouna Cabare Kountouri Datori !( !( Sécougourou Manta !( !( NATITINGOU o !( BEMBEREKE !( !( Kouandé o Sagbiabou Natitingou Kotoponga !(Makrou Gurai !( Bérasson !( !( Boukombé Niaro Naboulgou !( !( !( Nasso !( !( Kounounko Gbangbanrou !( Baré Borgou !( Nikki Wawa Nambiri Biro !( !( !( !( o !( !( Daroukparou KAINJI Copargo Péréré !( Chin NIAMTOUGOU(!o !( DJOUGOUo Djougou Benin !( Guerin-Kouka !( Babiré !( Afekaul Miassi !( !( !( !( Kounakouro Sheshe !( !( !( Partago Alafiarou Lama-Kara Sece Demon !( !( o Yendi (! Dabogou !( PARAKOU YENDI o !( Donga Aledjo-Koura !( Salamanga Yérémarou Bassari !( !( Jebba Tindou Kishi !( !( !( Sokodé Bassila !( Igbéré Ghana (! !( Tchaourou !( !(Olougbé Shaki Togo !( Nigeria !( !( Dadjo Kilibo Ilorin Ouessé Kalande !( !( !( Diagbalo Banté !( ILORIN (!o !( Kaboua Ajasse Akalanpa !( !( !( Ogbomosho Collines !( Offa !( SAVE Savé !( Koutago o !( Okio Ila Doumé !(
    [Show full text]
  • Population Étrangère Dans L'alibori Synthèse Des Principaux Résult
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN ------------------- MINISTERE DU PLAN ET DU DEVELOPPEMENT ------------------- Institut National de la Statistique et de l’Analyse Economique Synthèse des principaux résultats du RGPH-4 de l’ALIBORI 1- Etat et structure de la population de l’Alibori Evolution de la population de l’Alibori de 2002 à 2013 Taux d'accroissement Poids DIVISIONS RGPH4-2013 RGPH3-2002 intercensitaire démographique ADMINISTRATIVES en % (2002- en % en 2013 Total Masculin Féminin Total Masculin Féminin 2013) BENIN 10 008 749 4 887 820 5 120 929 6 769 914 3 284 119 3 485 795 3,52 ALIBORI 867 463 431 357 436 106 521 093 259 588 261 505 4,61 8,7 Banikoara 246 575 122 445 124 130 152 028 75 829 76 199 4,37 28,4 Gogounou 117 523 58 018 59 505 80 013 39 759 40 254 3,46 13,5 Kandi 179 290 88 998 90 292 95 206 47 600 47 606 5,76 20,7 Karimama 66 353 33 149 33 204 39 579 19 792 19 787 4,68 7,6 Malanville 168 641 83 681 84 960 101 628 50 263 51 365 4,58 19,4 Ségbana 89 081 45 066 44 015 52 639 26 345 26 294 4,77 10,3 En 2013, le département de l’Alibori compte 867 463 habitants soit 8,7% Evolution (en %) de la structure par âge de la population de l'Alibori au RGPH-1992, RGPH-2002 25,0 de la population béninoise. Le taux et RGPH-2013 1992 2002 2013 d’accroissement intercensitaire de 20,0 On constate depuis 1992 une 4,61% est supérieur à la moyenne augmentation de la proportion de la nationale.
    [Show full text]
  • Inadequacy of Benin's and Senegal's Education Systems to Local and Global Job Markets: Pathways Forward; Inputs of the Indian and Chinese Education Systems
    Clark University Clark Digital Commons International Development, Community and Master’s Papers Environment (IDCE) 5-2016 INADEQUACY OF BENIN'S AND SENEGAL'S EDUCATION SYSTEMS TO LOCAL AND GLOBAL JOB MARKETS: PATHWAYS FORWARD; INPUTS OF THE INDIAN AND CHINESE EDUCATION SYSTEMS. Kpedetin Mignanwande [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.clarku.edu/idce_masters_papers Part of the Higher Education Commons, International and Comparative Education Commons, Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Mignanwande, Kpedetin, "INADEQUACY OF BENIN'S AND SENEGAL'S EDUCATION SYSTEMS TO LOCAL AND GLOBAL JOB MARKETS: PATHWAYS FORWARD; INPUTS OF THE INDIAN AND CHINESE EDUCATION SYSTEMS." (2016). International Development, Community and Environment (IDCE). 24. https://commons.clarku.edu/idce_masters_papers/24 This Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Master’s Papers at Clark Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Development, Community and Environment (IDCE) by an authorized administrator of Clark Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. INADEQUACY OF BENIN'S AND SENEGAL'S EDUCATION SYSTEMS TO LOCAL AND GLOBAL JOB MARKETS: PATHWAYS FORWARD; INPUTS OF THE INDIAN AND CHINESE EDUCATION SYSTEMS. Kpedetin S. Mignanwande May, 2016 A MASTER RESEARCH PAPER Submitted to the faculty of Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, in partial fulfill- ment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in the department of International Development, Community, and Environment And accepted on the recommendation of Ellen E Foley, Ph.D. Chief Instructor, First Reader ABSTRACT INADEQUACY OF BENIN'S AND SENEGAL'S EDUCATION SYSTEMS TO LOCAL AND GLOBAL JOB MARKETS: PATHWAYS FORWARD; INPUTS OF THE INDIAN AND CHINESE EDUCATION SYSTEMS.
    [Show full text]
  • S a Rd in Ia
    M. Mandarino/Istituto Euromediterraneo, Tempio Pausania (Sardinia) Land07-1Book 1.indb 97 12-07-2007 16:30:59 Demarcation conflicts within and between communities in Benin: identity withdrawals and contested co-existence African urban development policy in the 1990s focused on raising municipal income from land. Population growth and a neoliberal environment weakened the control of clans and lineages over urban land ownership to the advantage of individuals, but without eradicating the importance of personal relationships in land transactions or of clans and lineages in the political structuring of urban space. The result, especially in rural peripheries, has been an increase in land aspirations and disputes and in their social costs, even in districts with the same territorial control and/or the same lines of nobility. Some authors view this simply as land “problems” and not as conflicts pitting locals against outsiders and degenerating into outright clashes. However, decentralization gives new dimensions to such problems and is the backdrop for clashes between differing perceptions of territorial control. This article looks at the ethnographic features of some of these clashes in the Dahoman historic region of lower Benin, where boundaries are disputed in a context of poorly managed urban development. Such disputes stem from land registries of the previous but surviving royal administration, against which the fragile institutions of the modern state seem to be poorly equipped. More than a simple problem of land tenure, these disputes express an internal rejection of the legitimacy of the state to engage in spatial structuring based on an ideal of co-existence; a contestation that is put forward with the de facto complicity of those acting on behalf of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Read More About SDG Bond Framework
    1 C1 - Public Natixis Summary FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 4 PART I: Benin mobilised for the 2030 Agenda ....................................................................................... 5 1. The basics about the Republic of Benin .......................................................................................... 5 1.1 Political and administrative organisation of Benin ..................................................................... 6 1.2 A predominately young and rural population ............................................................................. 6 1.3 Human development indicators are improving .......................................................................... 8 1.4 Benin’s economic structure ........................................................................................................ 8 1.5 The authorities’ response to the Covid-19 pandemic ................................................................ 9 2. Actions and policies closely anchored to the 2030 Agenda .......................................................... 11 2.1 Actions for taking ownership of the 2030 Agenda ................................................................... 11 2.2 Mobilising institutions and transforming public action to reach the SDGs ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Projet De Vulgarisation De L'aquaculture Continentale En République Du Bénin Quatrième Session Ordinaire Du Comité De Suiv
    Projet de Vulgarisation de l’Aquaculture Continentale en République du Bénin Bureau du Projet / Direction des Pêches Tel: 21 37 73 47 No 004 Le 22 Juillet 2011 Email: [email protected] Un an après son démarrage en juin 2011, le Projet de Vulgarisation de l’Aquaculture Continentale en République du Bénin (PROVAC), a connu un bilan positif meublé d’activités diverses mais essentiellement axées sur les formations de pisciculteurs ordinaires par l’approche « fermier à fermier »démarré au début du mois de juin 2010, poursuit ses activités et vient d’amor‐ cer le neuvième mois de sa mise en œuvre. Quatrième session ordinaire du Comité de Suivi Le Mercredi 18 Mai 2011 s’est tenue, dans la salle de formation de la Direction des Pêches à Cotonou, la quatrième session ordinaire du Comité de Suivi du Projet de Vulgarisation de l’Aqua‐ culture Continentale en République du Bénin (PROVAC). Cette rencontre a connu la participation des membres du Comité de Suivi désignés par les quatre Centres Régionaux pour la Promotion Agricole (CeRPA) impliqués dans le Projet sur le terrain et a été rehaussée par la présence de la Représentante Résidente de la JICA au Bénin. A cette session, les CeRPA Ouémé/Plateau, Atlantique/Littoral, Zou/Collines et Mono/Couffo ont fait le point des activités du Projet sur le terrain, d’une part, et le Plan de Travail Annuel (PTA) 4e session ordinaire approuvé à Tokyo par la JICA au titre de l’année japonaise 2011 a été exposé, d’autre part, par le du Comité du Suivi Chef d’équipe des experts.
    [Show full text]
  • African Dialects
    African Dialects • Adangme (Ghana ) • Afrikaans (Southern Africa ) • Akan: Asante (Ashanti) dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Fante dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Twi (Akwapem) dialect (Ghana ) • Amharic (Amarigna; Amarinya) (Ethiopia ) • Awing (Cameroon ) • Bakuba (Busoong, Kuba, Bushong) (Congo ) • Bambara (Mali; Senegal; Burkina ) • Bamoun (Cameroons ) • Bargu (Bariba) (Benin; Nigeria; Togo ) • Bassa (Gbasa) (Liberia ) • ici-Bemba (Wemba) (Congo; Zambia ) • Berba (Benin ) • Bihari: Mauritian Bhojpuri dialect - Latin Script (Mauritius ) • Bobo (Bwamou) (Burkina ) • Bulu (Boulou) (Cameroons ) • Chirpon-Lete-Anum (Cherepong; Guan) (Ghana ) • Ciokwe (Chokwe) (Angola; Congo ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Mauritian dialect (Mauritius ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Seychelles dialect (Kreol) (Seychelles ) • Dagbani (Dagbane; Dagomba) (Ghana; Togo ) • Diola (Jola) (Upper West Africa ) • Diola (Jola): Fogny (Jóola Fóoñi) dialect (The Gambia; Guinea; Senegal ) • Duala (Douala) (Cameroons ) • Dyula (Jula) (Burkina ) • Efik (Nigeria ) • Ekoi: Ejagham dialect (Cameroons; Nigeria ) • Ewe (Benin; Ghana; Togo ) • Ewe: Ge (Mina) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewe: Watyi (Ouatchi, Waci) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewondo (Cameroons ) • Fang (Equitorial Guinea ) • Fõ (Fon; Dahoméen) (Benin ) • Frafra (Ghana ) • Ful (Fula; Fulani; Fulfulde; Peul; Toucouleur) (West Africa ) • Ful: Torado dialect (Senegal ) • Gã: Accra dialect (Ghana; Togo ) • Gambai (Ngambai; Ngambaye) (Chad ) • olu-Ganda (Luganda) (Uganda ) • Gbaya (Baya) (Central African Republic; Cameroons; Congo ) • Gben (Ben) (Togo
    [Show full text]
  • Cage Project Final Evaluation 2001-2005
    COMMUNITY ACTION FOR GIRLS EDUCATION WORLD LEARNING / USAID CAGE PROJECT FINAL EVALUATION 2001-2005 June 2005 Justin DONGBEHOUNDE François GAUTHO Consultants CONTENTS Pages 0- SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 I- BACKGROUND 5 II- OBJECTIVES AND EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES 5 III- EVALUATION PROBLEMS 7 IV- EVALUATION RESULTATS 7 1. Level of results achievement and objectives 7 2. Analysis of the approach, strategies and stakeholders 17 3. Management and coordination of the project 19 4. Sustainability durability and replication of the experience 20 5. Strengths and weaknesses of the project 21 V- CONCLUSIONS 22 VI- RECOMMENDATIONS 23 VII- APPENDICES 24 CAGE project final evaluation O- SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions · The four objectives set are met both quantitatively and qualitatively. · The starting hypothesis of the project, that well stimulated community participation could lead to better results in the promotion of girls education is verified and it is correct. In fact, CAGE project has succeeded in arousing a high community mobilization and a strong commitment of CRL (Local representative Committees) and CCEF with meaningful results in their quantity and quality, in their dimension and depth. · This ability to stimulate the local/social support and mobilization comes from CAGE approach that is the entire process and steps leading to the set up of CRL and CCEF, the vision analysis and strategies, up to the micro project funding, all this back up with a very good social communication. · In this process, the set up of CRL and their composition played an important role. Truly the intension is a representative committee. Initially the social communication showed that members would be like pioneers, with no specific advantages, but more sacrifices and a lot of work to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Ketou
    REPUBLIQUE DU BENIN =-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-= MINISTERE DE LA PROSPECTIVE, DU DEVELOPPEMENT ET DE L’EVALUATION DE L’ACTION PUBLIQUE (MPDEAP) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA STATISTIQUE ET DE L’ANALYSE ECONOMIQUE (INSAE) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= MONOGRAPHIE DE LA COMMUNE DE KETOU DIRECTION DES ETUDES DEMOGRAPHIQUES Décembre 2008 TABLE DES MATIERES LISTE DES TABLEAUX ............................................................................................................ vi LISTE DES GRAPHIQUES ........................................................................................................ x PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................... xi NOTE METHODOLOGIQUE SUR LE RGPH-3 .................................................................. xiii SITUATION GEOGRAPHIQUE DE KETOU DANS LE BENIN .......................................... 1 SITUATION GEOGRAPHIQUE DE LA COMMUNE DE KETOU DANS LE DEPARTEMENT DU PLATEAU ............................................................................................... 2 1- GENERALITES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1-1 Présentation de la commune .................................................................................................. 3 1-1-1 Le relief ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Operational Eoa- I Project Report for Benin 2018
    0 REPUBLIC OF BENIN -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Organisation Béninoise Pour la Promotion de l’Agriculture Biologique (OBEPAB) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Project Mainstreaming Ecological Organic Agriculture (EOA) intoNational Policies, Strategies and Programmes in Africa Technical annual report for 2018 Reporting Period: January to December 2018 Supported by 0 1 Table content Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Major achievements ............................................................................................................................ 3 4. Challenges of EOA Implementation in Benin ..................................................................................... 7 5. Lessons to be learnt in EOA Implementation in Benin ...................................................................... 7 6. Recommendations and Conclusions in EOA Implementation in Benin ............................................ 8 1 2 1. Introduction Agriculture is the basis of the national economy. It occupies almost 70% of the active population and contributes 38% of GDP. However, current production systems, farmers use mostly mineral fertilizers for soil fertilization and synthetic chemical pesticides for pest management. Chemicals are used for other purposes among which are for food storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Benin: Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness
    Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Benin: Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness DREF operation Operation n° MDRBJ014; Date of Issue: 27 August 2014 Glide ° Date of disaster: 20 July 2014 Operation start date: 25 August 2014 Operation end date: 27 November ( 3 months) Host National Society(ies): Benin Red Cross Society Operation budget: CHF 50,204 Number of people affected: 14 Zones at risk Number of people assisted: One Million (indirect) 141,299 (direct) N° of National Societies involved in the operation: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Luxembourg Red Cross and Netherlands Red Cross N° of other partner organizations involved in the operation: Ministry of Health, Ministry of the Interior (through the ANPC), Plan Benin and United Nations Children’s Fund A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster In February 2014, there was an outbreak of the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in Guinea, which has spread to Liberia, Mali, Nigeria, Senegal and Sierra Leone causing untold hardship and hundreds of deaths in these countries. As of 27 February 2015, a total of 23,694 cases, and 9,589 deaths, which were attributed to the EVD, had been recorded across the most affected countries of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), an outbreak of the EVD was also reported, but is considered of a different origin than that which has affected West Africa. Benin, with a population of 10,051,000 (UNCDP 2014) shares a border with Nigeria, which has been affected by the EVD, and therefore the risks presented by the epidemic to the country are high.
    [Show full text]
  • Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-Cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin”
    Project evaluation series Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin” Project evaluation series Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of persistent organic pollutants and obsolete pesticides and strengthening life-cycle management of pesticides in Benin” GCP/BEN/056/GFF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin”. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]