DOCSLIB.ORG

D.3.2.1 Stakeholder Database

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

D.3.2.1 Stakeholder database April 2017 D.3.2.1 Stakeholder database Authors: Bojan Vogrinčič (LEAP), Štefan Žohar (LEAP) and Jasmina Perkič (LEAP) with contribtions from: MFGI, MFAT, InnoGeo, GeoZS, HGI-CGS, ZARA, IGR, Terratechnik, FZZG, GSRS, FMG, MSK, PSEMR DARLINGe project is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (1612249,99 €) and by the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance II (534646,6 €) under Grant Agreement no DTP1-099-3.2 Contents 1. DARLINGe – Introduction...........................................................................................1 2. Stakeholder database ...................................................................................................1 2.1 Results ..............................................................................................................................2 2.2 Project area by country.............................................................................................3 1. DARLINGe – Introduction The aim of DARLINGe project (Danube Region Leading Geothermal Energy), carried out by 15 partners from 6 countries in Central, South-East and Eastern Europe is to contribute to energy security and energy efficiency by enhancing the efficient use of deep untapped geothermal resources in the heating sector, and by introducing the “cascade use” of geothermal energy. Establishing a strong and alive contact with stakeholders representing the entire value chain of the geothremal sector in all participating countries is one of the main goals of DARLINGe. Consultations with stakeholders, their involvement into project activities, considerstion of their needs and tailoring project activities according to their expectations will ensure that final project outputs will reach their maximun impact. Furthermore the training of stakeholders on tools on sustainabe reservoir management developed by the project is also among the main aims of DARLINGe. The first step was to identify stakeholders in all partner countries, which was done at the very beginning of the project and which results are summarized in this report results (D 3.2.1 Stakeholder database) within WP 3 Capacity building / Activity 3.2 Stakeholder consultations. 2. Stakeholder database In Stakeholder database partners have identified the relevant stakeholders in all six partner countries according to the following target groups: • ministries having roles and competences associated to geothermal energy at national levels • public authorities involved in the licensing and management of deep geothermal energy resources including mining concessions, water management, environmental aspects, land-use planning, etc. • governmental and sectoral agencies at national and regional levels (e.g. developing agencies, energy secretariats, etc.) • service providers for the geothermal sector (e.g. drilling companies, surface installation providers – pipelines, heat pumps, etc.) • project developers, consulting companies • project operators: current thermal water users (e.g. spas, agriculture companies), heat suppliers (e.g. ESCO-s) • municipalities • network institutions (geothermal associations, clusters) • financing institutions (e.g. banks providing loans for geothermal projects) • academia (research institutes, universities) • civil society Partners from each project countries have prepared their own Stakeholder database (in the form of a uniform excel table) with the following main data: • original name of the organisation • English name of the organisation 1 • address • organisation email, website • contact person’s name and contact details (phone, email) • profile and characteristics of the organisations operations (main tasks, responsibilities) Based on the national databases LEAP (WP3 leader) has compiled Stakeholder database as a deliverable (D 3.2.1 Stakeholder database). This database is considered to be an alive document throughout the project lifetime: data might be correctd (e.g. new contact details), new stakeholders can be identfied and added during later project activities. An updated version of this database will be delivered at the end of the project. 2.1 Results The Stakeholder database contains contact details of 954 stakeholders representing the entire geothermal value chain (ministries, authorities, project developers and operators, present users, SME-s, academia, etc.) from 6 countries (Table 1). Table 1: Number of stakeholdes in database by Country In this document we present Stakeholder database only with selected data (contact person, name of the organisation, country, e-mail), however more detailed information, including profile and characteristics of the organisations operations (main tasks, responsibilities, activites, competencies, influences, etc. of all identified stakeholders) is available at this link: http://www.lea-pomurje.si/datoteke/dsh.xlsm Database with contacts of media (printed media, radio and TV media, web portal, press agency) is available at this link: http://www.lea-pomurje.si/datoteke/dm.xlsm 2 2.2 Stakeholder distribution per country area Table 2 shows the size of the DARLINGe project area by country. With the coefficient of the stakeholders per km 2 we got the information how many stakeholder/s cover one square kilometer of DARLINGe project area by country. Table 2: Project area by country, number of stakeholders in database by country, coefficient of stakeholders per km 2 The size of the No of The coefficient DARLINGe project Stakeholders in of the Country area by country (per database by stakeholders km 2) Country per km 2 Slovenia 4900 194 0,0396 Hungary 23152 362 0,0156 Romania 8026 121 0,0151 Croatia 27687 152 0,0055 Bosnia and Herzegovina 11590 56 0,0048 Serbia 24017 69 0,0029 DARLINGe area 99372 954 Table 3 shows that in Slovenia the coefficient of the stakeholders per km 2 is the highest (0,0396) so here the coverage with stakeholder over the area is the largest, in the second place is Hungary with coefficient 0,0156, then is Romania with 0,0151, Croatia (0,0055), Bosnia and Herzegovina (0,0048) and Serbia with coefficient 0,0029. Of course these numbers reflect the uneven territory of the participating countries, as well as the success rate of first identifications of stakeholders, however provide a first impression about the representation of the geothermal sector in the given country. Table 3: Coefficient of the stakeholders per km 2 3 Stakeholder database No Contact Person Name of the organisation Country E-mail Profile 1. Jasmin Kukec Bistra Hiša Smart House Slovenia [email protected] development agency (e.g. regional dev. agency) 2. Miran Blagovi č Segrap d.o.o. Slovenia [email protected] geothermal user (incl. balneology) 3. Simona Poto čnik Biotechnical school Raki čan Slovenia [email protected] other 4. Jožef Novak Slovenian Water Agency , Sector area Slovenia [email protected] authority Mura energy providers (e.g. district 5. Ladislav Tomši č DEM d.o.o. Slovenia [email protected] heating operator) 6. Darko Petrijan School of Economics M.Sobota Slovenia [email protected] other, academia (incl. research institutes, universities) 7. Vlasta Krmelj EnergaP - Energy Agency of Podravje Slovenia [email protected] development agency (e.g. regional dev. agency) 8. Aleksander Bokan GEO-VRTINA d.o.o. Slovenia [email protected] drilling company 9. Davorin Kurbos Public company Prlekija Slovenia [email protected] other JOŽEF OU EK S.P. , Murska Sobota 10. Jožef Ou ček Č Slovenia [email protected] industry (incl. oil company) electromechanics 11. Gregor Podvratnik KSSENA, Institute Energy agency for Slovenia [email protected] development agency (e.g. Savinja, Šalek and Koroška regions nje.eu regional dev. agency) 4 No Contact Person Name of the organisation Country E-mail Profile 12. Janez Petek Local Energy Agency Lower Podravje Slovenia [email protected] development agency (e.g. regional dev. agency) Local Energy Agency Dolenjska, development agency (e.g. 13. Janko Urši č Slovenia [email protected] Posavje and Bela Krajina regions regional dev. agency) 14. Matejka Horvat LRF Pomurje Regional NGO’s crossing Slovenia [email protected] development agency (e.g. point Pomurje regional dev. agency) National Consortium of the Energy development agency (e.g. 15. Bojan Vogrin čič Slovenia [email protected] Agencies of Slovenia regional dev. agency) [email protected], 16. Peter Polani č Panvita d.d. Slovenia other [email protected] 17. Robert Grah Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia [email protected]; association (e.g. Geothermal Pomurje [email protected] Association, Geological Society) 18. Darko Anželj Pomurje Development Institute Murska Slovenia [email protected] academia (incl. research Sobota institutes, universities) 19. Tatjana Fulder PORA, development Agency Gornja Slovenia [email protected] development agency (e.g. Radgona regional dev. agency) 20. Goran Šoster Prlekija development agency Slovenia [email protected] development agency (e.g. regional dev. agency) 21. Stanislav Sraka Development Agency Sinergija Slovenia [email protected] development agency (e.g. regional dev. agency) Development council of the Pomurje association (e.g. Geothermal 22. Branko Drvari č Slovenia [email protected] region Association, Geological Society) 23. Matej Kramar RE Ing d.o.o. Slovenia [email protected] other 24. mag. Robert Celec RIS, Dvorec Raki čan – Resource and Slovenia [email protected] other, academia (incl. research Education Centre institutes, universities)
Recommended publications
  • Ruralna Društva U Sjeni Metropole: Zagrebačka Županija

    Ruralna Društva U Sjeni Metropole: Zagrebačka Županija

    UDK 316.334.55 prethodno priopćenje ruralna društva u sjeni metropole: zagrebačka županija maja štambuk Na području Županije zagrebačke, utemeljene 1992. ima dvadeset općina i jedan grad. Dakle, većina od institut za društvena dvadeset naselja u neposrednoj okolici Zagreba po­ istraživanja, sljednjom su upravnom reformom stekla status zagreb, hrvatska općinskog središta i izišla iz anonimnosti, zajedno sa svojom (isto tako) ruralnom okolicom. Izuzetak su otprije gospodarski jača i napučenija mala gradska središta. Tek sada za ove ruralne zajednice nastupa razdoblje gospodarske i kulturne potvrde, napor da se oblikuje sa potrebitim elementima prepoznatljivo lokalno društvo na periferiji gospodarski i kulturno jakog, nacionalnog gradskog središta. Neke općine (1994) 13 aktualna tema već su profilirane u mnogim aspektima. No većina općina u Zagrebačkoj županiji male su ruralno- agrarne općine. O njihovim obilježjima na temelju objavljenih popisnih podataka pretežito ćemo govo­ (1/2) 13-25 riti u ovom tekstu. Namjera nam je da time skromno pripomognemo oblikovanju (mikro) identiteta koji primljeno listopada 1994. je u temelju razvitka malih ruralnih društava. > Zagrebačka županija, dijelom nekadašnji gradski "prsten", dragocjeni sociologija sela 32 je prostor u neposrednoj okolici metropole prema kojemu metropola tek mora istražiti podesan i uspješan pristup i pronaći pravu mjeru uzajamnog "iskorištavanja". Interesi grada i interesi okolne županije ne preklapaju se u potpunosti, pa za kompromisna rješenja mnogih pitanja, naročito s mo­ trišta dugoročna razvitka, valja izraditi stručne podloge. Zagrebačka županija obuhvaća prostor između najistočnije općine Far- kaševac i najzapadnije općine Sošice u Žumberku na samoj slovenskoj granici. Na sjeveru su općine Hruševec Kupljenski, Jakovlje, Sv. Ivan Ze­ lina, Preseka. Najjužniji njezin dio dolazi do općinskog područja Pisaro- vine.
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999

    FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999

    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
  • RES INTEGRATION CONCEPT PAPER D5.1 – Final Version

    RES INTEGRATION CONCEPT PAPER D5.1 – Final Version

    GeoCom – FP7 CONCERTO – 239515 RES INTEGRATION CONCEPT PAPER D5.1 – Final version WP Leader: P9 – University of Szeged. Key Contributors: P1, P2, P8 2012 GEOCOM WP5 - Technological Research / WP5.1 Integration with other RES The main scope of this sub-WP has been to outline ways of integrating geothermal energy in energy systems in Central-Eastern Europe. In this WP available experience of integrating geothermal energy into a cascaded facility with a view to environmental improvements and extending the utilization time and spectrum of uses of such facilities has been be studied. Researchers at the University of Szeged looked at the economic and environmental factors of geothermal systems operating in the South Great Plain Region, outlined potential project sites and developed a number of project plans presented here in brief. We collected data from GeoCom project partners too regarding utilization in other CEE countries. This volume presents the first concise study of actual and potential geothermal projects in the South Great Plain of Hungary, with project concepts developed entirely by our researchers and contracted experts. Our work is complemented by data provided by our partners from Serbia, Slovakia, FYROM and Poland. As projects in renewable energy use differ greatly from one-another we did not intend to formulate general conclusions regarding economic or environmental factors of RES integration. Rather, we present the RE potential of the target region, showcase our development proposals, and provide a tool (GIS model) to assist future project development. As stated in Annex 1 the main scope of this sub-WP has been to outline ways of integrating geothermal sources in energy systems, including those with other RES.
  • Martin Kojc, Most K Spoznanju, KUD Prasila, 2018) 10.40–10.55 Dr

    Martin Kojc, Most K Spoznanju, KUD Prasila, 2018) 10.40–10.55 Dr

    Prleška düša kot uvod v razpravo o Martinu Kojcu Državni svet RS Ljubljana 24. april 2019 10.00–10.20 Pozdravni nagovori Matjaž Švagan, podpredsednik Državnega sveta Jurij Borko, župan Občine Središče ob Dravi Danijel Vrbnjak, župan Občine Ormož Mag. Primož Ilešič, sekretar na Uradu RS za Slovence v zamejstvu in po svetu Dušan Gerlovič, predsednik uprave Ustanove dr. Antona Trstenjaka 10.20–10.40 Helena Srnec, kratka predstavitev knjige Prleška düša kot uvod v razpravo o Martinu Kojcu ter predstavitev Martina Kojca (Martin Kojc, most k spoznanju, KUD Prasila, 2018) 10.40–10.55 dr. Janek Musek, Filozofska fakulteta v Ljubljani, Oddelek za psihologijo – Martin Kojc – duhovni izvori in samoniklost 10.55–11.10 doc. dr. Igor Škamperle, Filozofska fakulteta v Ljubljani, Oddelek za sociologijo – Razumevanje celovitosti osebe v nauku Martina Kojca in pojem individuacije C. G. Junga 11.10–11.20 Jan Brodnjak, A. Diabelli: Sonata v f-duru 11.20–11.35 mag. Blanka Erhartič, Gimnazija Ormož – Kje lahko najde svoje mesto Martin Kojc v splošni gimnaziji? 11.35–11.50 mag. Franc Mikša, veleposlanik v Ministrstvu za zunanje zadeve – Razmišljanje gimnazijca ob branju knjige Martina Kojca Das Lehrbuch des Lebens v letih 1968 in 1969 11.50–12.05 mag. Bojan Šinko, Zasebna klinična psihološka ambulanta, pranečak M. Kojca – Martin Kojc skozi oči pranečaka 12.05–12.20 Razprava 12.20–13.00 Pogostitev Prleška düša kot uvod v razpravo o Martinu Kojcu Prleška düša; severovzhodna Slovenija s poudarkom na Prlekiji: prleški ustvarjalci in Prlekija v literarnih delih
  • Stručne Reference

    Stručne Reference

    5. USPOSTAVA I VOĐENJE INFORMACIJSKOG SUSTAVA PROSTORNOG UREĐENJA (ISPU) ZAGREBAČKE ŽUPANIJE • Implementacija Prostornog plana Zagrebačke županije u GIS, uključivo izmjene i dopune (2004.-2012.) i WEB GIS aplikacija (2012. i dalje) • Implementacija 34 prostorna plana uređenja gradova i općina u GIS i izrada Jedinstvene baze za izradu prostornih analiza (2004.-2008.) • Kontinuirana implementacija više od 100 izmjena i dopuna prostornih planova uređenja u GIS (2004.-2020.) STRUČNE • Priprema i obrada Prostornog plana Zagrebačke županije i prostornih planova iz nadležnosti JLS (PPUO/G, GUP, UPU, DPU) za Geoportal RH – dostupno na stranicama Ministarstva (ISPU-2013. - 2020.) REFERENCE • Izrada Registra prostornih planova Zagrebačke županije, ažuriranje i objava podataka na WEB GIS PREGLEDNIKU PROSTORNIH PLANOVA ZAVODA ZA PROSTORNO UREĐENJE na internetskim stranicama Zavoda www.zpuzz.hr (2014. – 2020.) ZAGREBAČKE ŽUPANIJE • Izrada aplikacije WEB GIS PERSPEKTIVNIH PODUZETNIČKIH ZONA na prostornim planovima i objava na www.zpuzz.hr (2016., 2020.) • Izrada WEB GIS PORTALA STANJE U PROSTORU ZAGREBAČKE ŽUPANIJE i objava na www.zpuzz.hr (2018., 2019.) Zagreb, ožujak 2021. 6. IZRADA I STRUČNA SURADNJA U IZRADI STUDIJA I STRUČNIH PODLOGA ŽUPANIJSKE RAZINE • Izrada Pilot projekta metodologije sanacije nezakonite gradnje u naseljima Bapča i Selnica na području Zagrebačke županije (2017.) • Izrada Županijskog programa aktivnosti i mjera za unaprjeđenje stanja prostora lokacija naseljenih Romima za Zagrebačku županiju (2006.) • Suradnja u izradi brošure Zaštićene prirodne vrijednosti na području Zagrebačke županije (2004.) • Suradnja u izradi stručnih podloga i studija iz područja sociologije, demografije, pedologije, hidrogeologije, zaštite kulturne i prirodne baštine, zaštite okoliša, razvoja prometne i komunalne infrastrukture, gospodarenja otpadom i dr. (1998. – 2019.) • Sudjelovanje u povjerenstvima za procjenu utjecaja na okoliš • Sudjelovanje u procjeniteljskim povjerenstvima (1999.-2020.) 7.
  • Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich. Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich

    Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich. Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich

    Photo courtesy Alaska State Library, Michael Z. Vinokouroff Collection P243-1-082. Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich. Sebastian Archimandrite Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich. Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich SERBIAN ORTHODOX APOSTLE TO AMERICA by Hieromonk Damascene . A A U S during the presidency of Abraham Lincoln, Archimandrite B Sebastian Dabovich has the distinction of being the first person born in the United States of America to be ordained as an Orthodox priest, 1 and also the first native-born American to be tonsured as an Orthodox monk. His greatest distinction, however, lies in the tremen- dous apostolic, pastoral, and literary work that he accomplished dur- ing the forty-eight years of his priestly ministry. Known as the “Father of Serbian Orthodoxy in America,” 2 he was responsible for the found- ing of the first Serbian churches in the New World. This, however, was only one part of his life’s work, for he tirelessly and zealously sought to spread the Orthodox Faith to all peoples, wherever he was called. He was an Orthodox apostle of universal significance. Describing the vast scope of Fr. Sebastian’s missionary activity, Bishop Irinej (Dobrijevic) of Australia and New Zealand has written: 1 Alaskan-born priests were ordained before Fr. Sebastian, but this was when Alaska was still part of Russia. 2 Mirko Dobrijevic (later Irinej, Bishop of Australia and New Zealand), “The First American Serbian Apostle—Archimandrite Sebastian Dabovich,” Again, vol. 16, no. 4 (December 1993), pp. 13–14. THE ORTHODOX WORD “Without any outside funding or organizational support, he carried the gospel of peace from country to country….
  • Deliverable T2.1.1 Collection of Primary and Secondary Data

    Deliverable T2.1.1 Collection of Primary and Secondary Data

    “Development of an innovative network for the promotion of extroversion of agro-food companies in Adriatic – Ionian Area” Collection of Primary and Secondary Data This report was prepared for and submitted to the “INNOVAGRO” Project by: “This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of the Technical University of Crete and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union and/or ADRION Programme authorities”. © Copyright by the “Innovagro” project Collection of Primary and Secondary Data The “INNOVAGRO” partnership consists of: Name Role Country Chania Chamber of Commerce and Industry Lead Partner Greece Region of Crete Partner 2 Greece Technical University of Crete Partner 3 Greece Network of the Insular Chamber of Commerce Partner 4 Greece and Industry of the European Union Province of Potenza Partner 5 Italy E-institute, institute for comprehensive Partner 6 Slovenia development solutions Italian Confederation of Agriculture Partner 7 Italy Union of Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Partner 8 Albania Albania Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Serbia Partner 9 Serbia University of Basilicata Partner 10 Italy History Changes Version Date of Issue Document Title Author(s) Controller Number 1.0 23/7/2019 E. Grigoroudis T. Tsimrikidis ©INNOVAGRO Page 1 Collection of Primary and Secondary Data Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ........................................................................................................
  • Budget Outturns of Croatian Municipalities, Cities and Counties for 20151

    Budget Outturns of Croatian Municipalities, Cities and Counties for 20151

    NEWSLETTER Zagreb l Smičiklasova 21 doi: 10.3326/nle.2016.108 [email protected] l www.ijf.hr l tel: +385(0)1 4886 444 No. 108 l November 2016 l ISSN 1848-4662 Budget outturns of Croatian municipalities, cities and counties for 20151 KATARINA OTT, MIHAELA BRONIĆ, BRANKO STANIĆ This article aims to provide a simple presentation of basic data on the budget outturns of Croatian local government units in 2015.2 It includes synthesized tables based on the Ministry of Finance's database, showing revenues and expenditures3, as well as surpluses or deficits (in per capita and total terms). Also presented are data on the populations4 and levels of budget transparency in all the local government units5. This analysis and the tables additionally provided in the Excel format, allow all interested parties to get acquainted with the financial condition of their respective local government units in 2015 and make relevant comparisons with the situation in 20146. While the Ministry of Finance does publish budget outturns for all local government units7, they are in the form of oversized Excel tables, with the cities and municipalities arranged by county. Given the large number of local government units (whose complete budgets are presented), the navigation through these tables and comparison across the local units is often difficult. This article gives the reader a snapshot of the basic financial condition of the local government units in 2015, while more detailed information can be found on the Ministry of Finance’s and local government units’ websites. Nevertheless, some notes may be necessary for a proper understanding of the presented data.
  • Hungary As a Country of Asylum, March 2016 2 A

    Hungary As a Country of Asylum, March 2016 2 A

    Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Ukraine Austria Hungary Slovenia Croatia Romania Bosnia and Serbia Herzegovina Montenegro Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) HungaryThe former Yugoslav Republic As a Country of Asylumof Macedonia Italy Albania Greece Observations on restrictive legal measures and subsequent practice implemented between July 2015 and March 2016 May 2016 Contents Contents A. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................3 B. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................4 C. Background .................................................................................................................................................................................5 D. Border procedure in the transit zones at Hungary’s borders with Serbia and Croatia ..................................8 a) Legal basis of the border procedure in the transit zones .............................................................................................8 b) Implementation of the border procedure in practice ................................................................................................. 10 E. Safe third country concept ................................................................................................................................................. 13 a) Introduction
  • Churches in Serbia and Germany in Dialogue

    Churches in Serbia and Germany in Dialogue

    TOWARD THE HEALING OF MEMORIES AND CHANGING OF PERCEPTIONS: CHURCHES IN SERBIA AND GERMANY IN DIALOGUE A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Angela V. Ilić MAY 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Leonard J. Swidler, Advisory Chair, Department of Religion Dr. Terry Rey, Department of Religion Dr. John C. Raines, Department of Religion Dr. Paul B. Mojzes, Rosemont College Dr. Kyriakos M. Kontopoulos, External Reader, Department of Sociology © by Angela Valeria Ilić 2012 All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT This dissertation examines a series of interchurch consultations that took place between 1999 and 2009 with the participation of the Evangelical Church in Germany, the Roman Catholic German Bishops’ Conference and the Serbian Orthodox Church. The Protestant-Catholic-Orthodox ecumenical encounters began in the immediate aftermath of the Kosovo crisis, and aimed to support Serbia’s democratization and European integration. At a total of nine meetings, delegates from the participating churches, together with politicians, representatives of non-governmental organizations, and scholars from various fields, discussed the role of churches and religion in the two countries. The meetings provided a forum for exchanging knowledge and addressing the challenges confronting the churches and their social organizations. Through lectures, discussions, and meetings in working groups, the consultations focused on theological, legal, political, and social topics, such as church and state relations in Serbia, the role of churches in secularized society, Serbia’s relationship to the rest of Europe, reconciliation, and the healing of memories. Focusing on the content and the outcomes of the consultations, the author places them into the broader ecumenical, social and political context in which they took place.
  • LEARNING in ADULTHOOD Cases of Lifelong Learning

    LEARNING in ADULTHOOD Cases of Lifelong Learning

    Edina Márkus PhD – Barbara Máté-Szabó Márta Takács-Miklósi PhD (eds.) LEARNING IN ADULTHOOD Cases of lifelong learning Debrecen, 2019 Publishing data Responsible publisher: Nullpont Cultural Association Project name: Learning communities and social transformation Project number: EFOP-5.2.2-17-2017-00066 Technical editor, typography: Balázs Pete Press work: Kapitális Press Book Format: A5 size Scope of the book: 132 Font: Arial Lectors: Tamás Kozma DSc Balázs Benkei-Kovács PhD Learning in Adulthood Edited: Edina Márkus PhD – Barbara Máté-Szabó Márta Takács-Miklósi PhD ISBN number: 978-615-00-5230-4 Contents Foreword ..................................................................................... 9 I. Settlement-based analyses and good practices ........................... 13 Anita Hegedűs:The role of cultural and community learning in the development of the Makó township: Cultural and community learning in Földeák ............................................................................................ 15 Dávid Rábai: Community learning and social innovation – the case of Hajdúhadház .................................................................................... 27 Barbara Máté-Szabó: The role of sports in community building and developing learning in the Hajdúnánás township ......................... 37 Dorina Anna Tóth: CHEC as an opportunity for breaking out – the case of Sátoraljaújhely ................................................................... 47 II. Organisation-based initiatives, domestic and international good
  • References, 99-103

    References, 99-103

    References Henning Andersen, 1999: The Western South Slavic Contrast Sn. sah‑ni‑ti // SC. sah‑nu‑ti. Slovenski jezik – Slovene Linguistic Studies 2, 47–62. Peter Auer and Aldo di Luzio, 1988: Variation and Convergence: Studies in Social Dialectology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Peter Auer and Frans Hinskens, 1996: The Convergence and Divergence of Dia‑ lects in Europe. Sociolinguistica 10, 1–30. Vladimir Bračič, 1967: Vinorodne Haloze. Maribor: Založba Obzorja. – –, 1982: Gozdnate Haloze. Maribor: Založba Obzorja. Andrew F. Burghardt, 1962: Borderland: A Historical and Geographical Study of Burgenland, Austria. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. J. K. Chambers, and Peter Trudgill, 1980: Dialectology. London: Cambridge University Press. Jože Ciperle and Andrej Vovko, 1987: Šolstvo na Slovenskem skozi stoletja. Lju‑ bljana: Slovenski šolski muzej. H. Giles, D. Taylor and R. Bourhis, 1973: Toward a Theory of Interpersonal Accommodation through Speech: Some Canadian Data. Language in Society 2, 177–92. Marc L. Greenberg, 1992: Circumflex Advancement in Prekmurje and Beyond. Journal of the Society for Slovene Studies 14/1, 69–91. – –, 1995: Archaisms and Innovations in the Dialect of Sredisce (Southeastern Prlekija, Slovenia). Proceedings of the 9th Biennial Conference on Balkan and South Slavic Linguistics, Literature and Folklore (Indiana Slavic Studies 7), 91–102. – –, 2000: A Historical Phonology of the Slovene Language. Heidelberg: Universitäts‑ verlag C. Winter. – –, 2006: A Short Reference Grammar of Standard Slovene. SEELRC Reference Gram‑ mar Network. Duke University / University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill: SEELRC. 99 Grant H. Lundberg, Dialect Leveling in Haloze, Slovenia Stanko Guldescu, 1964: History of Medieval Croatia. The Hague: Mouton and Co. Peter Herrity, 2000: Slovene: A Comprehensive Grammar.