DOCSLIB.ORG

RES INTEGRATION CONCEPT PAPER D5.1 – Final Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RES INTEGRATION CONCEPT PAPER D5.1 – Final Version GeoCom – FP7 CONCERTO – 239515 RES INTEGRATION CONCEPT PAPER D5.1 – Final version WP Leader: P9 – University of Szeged. Key Contributors: P1, P2, P8 2012 GEOCOM WP5 - Technological Research / WP5.1 Integration with other RES The main scope of this sub-WP has been to outline ways of integrating geothermal energy in energy systems in Central-Eastern Europe. In this WP available experience of integrating geothermal energy into a cascaded facility with a view to environmental improvements and extending the utilization time and spectrum of uses of such facilities has been be studied. Researchers at the University of Szeged looked at the economic and environmental factors of geothermal systems operating in the South Great Plain Region, outlined potential project sites and developed a number of project plans presented here in brief. We collected data from GeoCom project partners too regarding utilization in other CEE countries. This volume presents the first concise study of actual and potential geothermal projects in the South Great Plain of Hungary, with project concepts developed entirely by our researchers and contracted experts. Our work is complemented by data provided by our partners from Serbia, Slovakia, FYROM and Poland. As projects in renewable energy use differ greatly from one-another we did not intend to formulate general conclusions regarding economic or environmental factors of RES integration. Rather, we present the RE potential of the target region, showcase our development proposals, and provide a tool (GIS model) to assist future project development. As stated in Annex 1 the main scope of this sub-WP has been to outline ways of integrating geothermal sources in energy systems, including those with other RES. However, as WP5.4 deals specifically with integrated utilization of waste gases of thermal wells in this phase we focused on GE system layouts and their integration with wind and solar energy, and present outputs related to waste gas integration under WP5.4. Solar and wind energy as well as biomass provide the context of integration for geothermal. We assessed the potential of these three sources and forms of energy use in the target region, and summarized our analysis by developing and hence publishing an interactive tool that enables a multiple input evaluation of potential project sites. Our model is intended for large scale assets assessment and decision makers on all levels may make use of it. Designed primarily for an expert target group in mind as it was, our model may also be used in education while case studies and project plans can serve as blueprints for future developments. The following activities had been planned and were carried out: 1) Investigation of the economic factors that influence the integration of GE in energy systems. 2) Investigation of other factors that influence the integration of GE in energy systems. 3) Identification of integrated systems potential layouts. 4) Studies for the improvement of geothermal energy utilization in CEE. Partner participation P2/P8: Data collection for case studies on RES integration in Italy; (as Italy is not CEE, these data were not included in the final document) P4: Data collection for case studies on RES integration in Slovakia; P5: Data collection for case studies on RES integration in Poland; P7: Data collection for case studies on RES integration in FYROM; P14: Data collection for case studies on RES integration in Serbia Participants from the University of Szeged: Dr. Elemér Pál-Molnár, D. Félix Schubert, Dr. Tamás Medgyes, Dr. Balázs Kóbor, Dr. János Szanyi. Experts: Dr. Balázs Kovács, Dr. Imre Czinkota, Márton Papp, Sándor Kiss, Tibor Jánosi-Mózes, Mihály Kurunczi. WP5: Technological Research / WP5.1 Integration with other RES Page: 2 GEOCOM Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 9 THE GEOTHERMAL FEATURES OF CEE ....................................................................................... 11 THE GEOTHERMAL FEATURES OF HUNGARY ........................................................................ 11 GEOTHERMAL FEATURES OF THE SOUTH GREAT PLAIN REGION .................................. 12 THE RISKS OF UTILIZATION OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY .................................................. 14 ENERGY STRUCTURE OF HUNGARY ................................................................................... 15 HUNGARY’S ENERGY POLICY ............................................................................................... 16 THE GEOTHERMAL FEATURES OF SERBIA ............................................................................. 17 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 17 THE USE OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY .................................................................................. 18 CURRENT PRICES OF DRILLS AND ENERGY ...................................................................... 19 MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR UTILIZING GEOTHERMAL ENERGY ................................ 19 ECONOMIC OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................... 20 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................ 21 THE GEOTHERMAL FEATURES OF SLOVAKIA......................................................................... 23 GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 23 GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES AND POTENTIAL .................................................................... 23 GEOTHERMAL UTILIZATION .................................................................................................. 24 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALATIONS .................................................................... 25 THE GEOTHERMAL FEATURES OF POLAND............................................................................ 26 GEOLOGICAL AND GEOTHERMAL BACKGROUND ............................................................. 26 THE GEOTHERMAL FEATURES OF FYROM ............................................................................. 28 GEOLOGY BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 28 WP5: Technological Research / WP5.1 Integration with other RES Page: 3 GEOCOM GEOTHERMAL BACKROUND ................................................................................................. 29 GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES AND POTENTIAL .................................................................... 29 GEOTHERMAL FIELDS IN MACEDONIA ................................................................................ 30 THE GEOTHERMAL FEATURES OF ITALY ................................................................................ 32 Utilization of solar energy .................................................................................................................. 36 THE SOLAR FEATURES OF HUNGARY ..................................................................................... 46 THE SOLAR FEATURES OF SERBIA .......................................................................................... 48 THE SOLAR FEATURES OF SLOVAKIA ..................................................................................... 50 THE SOLAR FEATURES OF POLAND ........................................................................................ 52 THE SOLAR FEATURES OF MACEDONIA ................................................................................. 54 THE SOLAR FEATURES OF ITALY ............................................................................................. 56 Utilization of wind energy ................................................................................................................... 59 THE WIND ENERGY POTENTIAL OF HUNGARY ....................................................................... 66 THE WIND ENERGY POTENTIAL OF SERBIA ............................................................................ 69 THE WIND ENERGY POTENTIAL OF SLOVAKIA ....................................................................... 71 THE WIND ENERGY POTENTIAL OF POLAND .......................................................................... 73 THE WIND ENERGY POTENTIAL OF FYROM ............................................................................ 76 THE WIND ENERGY POTENTIAL OF ITALY ............................................................................... 78 THE POSSIBILITIES OF BIOMASS UTILIZATION IN CEE .............................................................. 80 THE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL OF HUNGARY ................................................................ 89 THE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL OF SERBIA ..................................................................... 91 THE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL OF SLOVAKIA ................................................................ 94 THE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL OF POLAND ................................................................... 96 THE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL OF FYROM ..................................................................... 99 THE BIOMASS ENERGY POTENTIAL OF ITALY .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation Developed by Administrative Structures in Romania and Hungary
    1216-2574 / USD 20.00 ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA 55, No 2, pp. 150–162 (2014) © 2014 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest DOI: 10.1556/AJur.55.2014.2.5 The European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation Developed by Administrative Structures in Romania and Hungary CĂTĂLIN-SILVIU SĂRARU Abstract. This study aims to fi rstly develop a brief review of the creation and functioning of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC), highlighting the role of the EGTC in respect of its contribution to the harmonious development of the whole European Union through the strengthening of economic, social and territorial cohesion. The article highlights recent changes in EU legislation governing the EGTC and analyses the infl uence that there is in choosing the State where a Gro uping will be located, and the applicable law. Subsequently, the article outlines the contribution of those EGTCs – constituted by municipalities in Romania and Hungary – to regional sustainable development. Utilising a cross-border EGTC is a way of promoting of better neighbourliness, and stimulating balanced economic development and social stability by harnessing local resources and regional joint projects. At the end of the article I stress the need for cross-border cooperation between Romania and Hungary in developing services of general economic interest, as well as transport infrastructure and tourism. Keywords: European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC), territorial cooperation, cross-border governance, municipalities I. INTRODUCTION The European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) is a legal, non-profi t entity, composed of states, regional authorities and local authorities, bodies governed by public law within the European Union with the objective of facilitating and promoting cross- border, transnational and/or interregional cooperation (Spinaci–Vara-Arribas 2009: 5) between its members for the purpose of strengthening the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • A) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Quality Schemes for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs (2017/C 252/10
    C 252/14 EN Official Journal of the European Union 3.8.2017 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2017/C 252/10) This publication confers the right to oppose the application pursuant to Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1). SINGLE DOCUMENT ‘MAKÓI PETREZSELYEMGYÖKÉR’ EU No: PGI-HU-02155 — 22.7.2016 PDO ( ) PGI ( X ) 1. Title ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ 2. Member State or Third Country Hungary 3. Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff 3.1. Type of product Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed 3.2. Description of the product to which the name in (1) applies The protected geographical indication ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ designates a particular root of the Petroselinum crispum var. tuberosum Makó long parsley variety. It has a smooth, level surface and dense texture, its flesh is white, its outer colour creamy white, and it has a slightly sweet taste. It has a pleasant flavour and aroma and is highly productive and long-lasting. A p arsley root can be called ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ if it is more than 30 cm in length and at least 3 cm in width. It has an extremely high dry matter content, averaging 35-40 %, though values above 45 % are not unheard of, which is outstanding in comparison with other varieties. The high dry matter content has a positive effect on the product's shelf life.
    [Show full text]
  • Csanytelek Község
    Csongrád Város Környezeti Fenntarthatósági Terv Local Agenda 21 (2016-2019) A dokumentumot Csongrád Város Önkormányzata…….. határozati számmal 2016… ……n elfogadta ………………………………………………………. Jegyző Készítette: Csongrád Város Önkormányzatának Megbízásából az Ár-Tér Kft. 2 Tartalom 1 BEVEZETÉS ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Mi a fenntartható fejlődés?..................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 A fenntartható fejlődés lényege: ..................................................................................... 6 1.1.2 Az Európai Unió prioritásai 2020-ig: ................................................................................ 7 1.1.3 A Fenntartható Fejlődés szempontjainak figyelembe vétele az Európai Unió keretében benyújtott pályázatoknál:................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 A települési fenntarthatósági tervről/programról általában ................................................ 10 1.3 A Local Agenda 21 megvalósításának lépései ....................................................................... 10 1.4 A települési fenntarthatósági terv stratégiai céljai ............................................................... 11 2 HELYZETFELMÉRÉS ........................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Csongrád fenntarthatósági
    [Show full text]
  • BTC EGTC, Region's Bridge of Innovation
    BTC EGTC, 20 region’s bridge 18 of innovation Preface City mayors from three countries collaboration. This is particularly have created the idea of the important for us, since we want to Grouping in 2009. keep economical, commercial, social The Grouping was established in contacts in the region covered by order to achieve their main goal BTC EGTC group. - the reducing of development The Grouping’s primary goal is a diff erences in the area surrounding harmonical regional development, the Hungarian-Romanian-Serbian improvement of the economical, border. social and territorial cohesion, as The establishment of BTC EGTC well as enabling a successful cross- provides such opportunities, which border collaboration. help to remove the borders in the region, and build bridges between BTC EGTC the local authorities, in their organization 2 BTC EGTC Introduction On 17th June 2009, almost fi fty mayors from the triple-border region municipalities decided to establish a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) named „Banat - Triplex Confi nium” in a summit in Mórahalom. The headquarters of the Group is also in Mórahalom. The initial membership of BTC EGTC contained 37 Hungarian municipalities, 37 Romanian municipalities, as well as 8 Serbian towns as observing members. Another three Hungarian municipalities joined the Group in 2012 - Csengele, Kistelek and Zá- kányszék. Banat-Triplex Confi nium EGTC members are the following: BTC EGTC, region’s bridge of innovation 2018 Hungary • Ambrózfalva • Ferencszállás • Kunbaja • Öttömös • Apátfalva
    [Show full text]
  • High Tunnels
    High Tunnels Using Low-Cost Technology to Increase Yields, Improve Quality and Extend the Season By Ted Blomgren and Tracy Frisch Produced by Regional Farm and Food Project and Cornell University with funding from the USDA Northeast Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program Distributed by the University of Vermont Center for Sustainable Agriculture High Tunnels Authors Ted Blomgren Extension Associate, Cornell University Tracy Frisch Founder, Regional Farm and Food Project Contributing Author Steve Moore Farmer, Spring Grove, Pennsylvania Illustrations Naomi Litwin Published by the University of Vermont Center for Sustainable Agriculture May 2007 This publication is available on-line at www.uvm.edu/sustainableagriculture. Farmers highlighted in this publication can be viewed on the accompanying DVD. It is available from the University of Vermont Center for Sustainable Agriculture, 63 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405. The cost per DVD (which includes shipping and handling) is $15 if mailed within the continental U.S. For other areas, please contact the Center at (802) 656-5459 or [email protected] with ordering questions. The High Tunnels project was made possible by a grant from the USDA Northeast Region Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program (NE-SARE). Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the United States Department of Agriculture. University of Vermont Extension, Burlington, Vermont. University of Vermont Extension, and U.S. Department of Agriculture, cooperating, offer education and employment to everyone without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or familial status.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary As a Country of Asylum, March 2016 2 A
    Poland Czech Republic Slovakia Ukraine Austria Hungary Slovenia Croatia Romania Bosnia and Serbia Herzegovina Montenegro Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) HungaryThe former Yugoslav Republic As a Country of Asylumof Macedonia Italy Albania Greece Observations on restrictive legal measures and subsequent practice implemented between July 2015 and March 2016 May 2016 Contents Contents A. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................................3 B. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................4 C. Background .................................................................................................................................................................................5 D. Border procedure in the transit zones at Hungary’s borders with Serbia and Croatia ..................................8 a) Legal basis of the border procedure in the transit zones .............................................................................................8 b) Implementation of the border procedure in practice ................................................................................................. 10 E. Safe third country concept ................................................................................................................................................. 13 a) Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • LEARNING in ADULTHOOD Cases of Lifelong Learning
    Edina Márkus PhD – Barbara Máté-Szabó Márta Takács-Miklósi PhD (eds.) LEARNING IN ADULTHOOD Cases of lifelong learning Debrecen, 2019 Publishing data Responsible publisher: Nullpont Cultural Association Project name: Learning communities and social transformation Project number: EFOP-5.2.2-17-2017-00066 Technical editor, typography: Balázs Pete Press work: Kapitális Press Book Format: A5 size Scope of the book: 132 Font: Arial Lectors: Tamás Kozma DSc Balázs Benkei-Kovács PhD Learning in Adulthood Edited: Edina Márkus PhD – Barbara Máté-Szabó Márta Takács-Miklósi PhD ISBN number: 978-615-00-5230-4 Contents Foreword ..................................................................................... 9 I. Settlement-based analyses and good practices ........................... 13 Anita Hegedűs:The role of cultural and community learning in the development of the Makó township: Cultural and community learning in Földeák ............................................................................................ 15 Dávid Rábai: Community learning and social innovation – the case of Hajdúhadház .................................................................................... 27 Barbara Máté-Szabó: The role of sports in community building and developing learning in the Hajdúnánás township ......................... 37 Dorina Anna Tóth: CHEC as an opportunity for breaking out – the case of Sátoraljaújhely ................................................................... 47 II. Organisation-based initiatives, domestic and international good
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Series Recueil Des Traite's
    Treaty Series Treaties and internationalagreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 577 Recueil des Traite's Traitis et accords internationaux enregistres ou classes et inscrits au r'pertoire au Secritariat de l'Organisation des Nations Unies United Nations* Nations Unies New York, 1968 Treaties and internationalagreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 577 1966 I. Nos. 8370-8381 TABLE OF CONTENTS Treaties and internationalagreements registeredfrom 9 November 1966 to 10 November 1966 Page No. 8370. Hungary and Yugoslavia: Agreement establishing regulations for the transport of goods by lorry or similar motor vehicle and the customs procedure in connexion there- with (with Protocol). Signed at Budapest, on 9 February 1962 .. ..... 3 No. 8371. Hungary and Yemen: Treaty of Friendship and Co-operation. Signed at Budapest, on 30 May 1964 . .. 39 No. 8372. Hungary and Yugoslavia: Convention concerning scientific, educational and cultural co-operation. Signed at Belgrade, on 15 October 1963 ... ............. .. 49 No. 8373. Hungary and Bulgaria: Agreement concerning scientific and cultural co-operation. Signed at Buda- pest, on 19 August 1965 ....... .................... ... 67 No. 8374. Hungary and Yugoslavia: Agreement concerning the abolition of the visa requirement. Signed at Budapest, on 23 November 1965 ..... ................ 89 No. 8375. Hungary and Yugoslavia: Agreement concerning the regulation of minor frontier traffic (with annexes). Signed at Budapest, on 9 August 1965 .... .............. ... 103 No. 8376. Hungary and Poland: Agreement concerning international motor transport. Signed at Budapest, on 18 July 1965 .... ... ... ......................... 161 Traitis et accords internationauxenregistris ou classis et inscrits au ripertoire au Secritariat de l'Organisationdes Nations Unies VOLUME 577 1966 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Growers Module 10: Protected Cropping Briefing Paper
    Future Growers Module 10: Protected cropping Briefing paper With thanks to Gareth Davies and Margi Lennartsson: Organic Vegetable Production – A Complete Guide. 2 OVERVIEW 1. Introduction and principles 2. Standards 3. Types of protected cropping crop covers cloches / low tunnels polytunnels Spanish tunnels Greenhouse cropping 4. Cropping crop choice soil fertility and management irrigation climate control pests and diseases weed control 5. Other considerations planning permission tunnel covers recycling of plastics 3 Introduction and principles Protected cropping is an important part of UK organic production - in 2003-04 it accounted for about 26% of the wholesale value of all UK-produced organic vegetables. The facility to extend the season at either end is vital for most organic growers. It can improve cash flow, maintain continuity, command higher prices for crops, increase the range of crops that can be grown and help minimise the quantities of bought in or imported produce. These factors are especially important for growers selling directly to the public through box schemes, farmers markets and farm shops. In addition the workload can be spread over a longer period and work can be found inside when inclement weather does not permit activity in the field. Greenhouses and polytunnels can also be useful for plant raising, drying crops e.g. onions and garlic, chitting potatoes and on mixed holdings for lambing sheep and raising ducks and turkeys. There are some critics of polytunnels and their visual impact on the countryside, though this is normally more of a problem for larger growers with acres of tunnels. 1. Standards Following a process of consultation and development with growers, the Soil Association has published a new set of specific standards for protected cropping, which will be applied from 1 April 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Title
    FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN HUNGARIAN CITIES: THE CASE OF SZENTES Prepared for Prepared by Róbert Kovács Andrea Tönkõ January 1999 THE URBAN INSTITUTE UI Project 06610-536 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 (202) 833-7200 www.urban.org East European Regional 2 Housing Sector Assistance Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................. 1 Economy ................................................................. 2 Infrastructure .............................................................. 2 Other Features ............................................................ 3 Municipal Services: Service Provision and Financing .............................. 3 Service Provision Regulations ............................................... 4 Changes in Institutions and Service Provision in the Past 5 Years ................. 6 The Financing of Municipal Services ......................................... 10 Central Grants ............................................................ 14 The Municipal Response to the Increasing Financial Problems ................... 14 Financial Management ...................................................... 16 Local Revenues .......................................................... 16 Local tax policy ......................................................... 18 Fee revenues .......................................................... 21 Loans ................................................................. 21 Techniques of Financial Management .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Szennyvízcsatorna Beruházás Lakossági Feladatairól
    104. szám Hírek, információk Csanytelek életéről 2015. július Csanyi Hírmondó Ismételt tájékoztatás A szennyvízcsatorna beruházás lakossági feladatairól Tájékoztatom Önöket arról, hogy a településen folyó szennyvízcsatorna- és szennyvíztisztító-mű kiépítése félidőhöz érkezett. Az alábbi utcákban készült el, épült ki a gerincvezeték, összesen 482 bekötéssel: Járandó u., Nagy Imre u., József Attila u., Arany János u., Ady Endre u., Árpád u., Baross Gábor u., Bercsényi u., Botond u., Kossuth u., Szent László u., Petőfi Sándor u., Gárdonyi utcán. A közeljövőben (2015. július-augusztus) kerül sor a gerincvezeték még hiányzó részeinek fektetésére, majd 212 db be- kötése kivitelezésére. Ahhoz, hogy határidőre megvalósulhasson a beruházás, elengedhetetlen az Önök közreműködése a házi bekötések kivitelezése körében, melyhez a fővállalkozó képviseletében eljárni jogosult nyújt segítséget abban, hogy az érintett ingatlantulajdonos költségén beszerzendő szabványos cső és idomok szükséges mennyiségét – térítésmentesen – felméri, mellyel pénz és idő takarítható meg. Felhívom a figyelmet arra, hogy a megadott szabványtól eltérő minőségű, méretezésű csővel, idommal készült házi bekötést a jövőbeni üzemeltető (Alföldvíz Zrt.) nem fogja átvenni!! Tájékoztatom Önöket továbbá arról, hogy 2015. július hónaptól minden munkanapon 9 órától 16 óráig, szombaton 8 órától 12 óráig a Magic Force Bt-nél (vasbolt) a szennyvíz házi bekötéséhez szükséges szabványos cső, és idomok megvá- sárolhatók! A bekötéshez szükséges anyag árfekvése lényegesen előnyösebb a környékben
    [Show full text]
  • Bíróságok Elnevezése És Székhelye
    2010. évi CLXXXIV. törvény a bíróságok elnevezésér ől, székhelyér ől és illetékességi területének meghatározásáról 1 1. § (1) 2 A járásbíróságok és kerületi bíróságok (a továbbiakban együtt: járásbíróság), a közigazgatási és munkaügyi bíróságok, továbbá a törvényszékek elnevezését és illetékességi területét az 1. melléklet tartalmazza. (2) Az ítél őtáblák elnevezését és illetékességi területét a 2. melléklet tartalmazza. (3) 3 A Kúria illetékességi területe az ország egész területére kiterjed. 2. § (1) 4 A járásbíróság és a közigazgatási és munkaügyi bíróság székhelye - (2) bekezdésben foglalt kivétellel - az elnevezésében megjelölt település. (2) A kerületi bíróságok székhelye Budapest. (3) 5 A törvényszékek székhelyét az 1. melléklet tartalmazza. (4) Az ítél őtáblák székhelye az elnevezésükben megjelölt település, a F ővárosi Ítél őtábla esetében pedig Budapest. (5) 6 A Kúria székhelye Budapest. 3. § (1) 7 Törvény által meghatározott ügyekben els ő fokon - a 3. mellékletben kijelölt törvényszékeken az ott meghatározott illetékességi területen - katonai tanácsok járnak el. (2) 8 A kijelölt törvényszékeken m űköd ő katonai tanácsok által els ő fokon elbírált ügyekben másodfokon a F ővárosi Ítél őtábla katonai tanácsa jár el. 3/A. § 9 A közigazgatási és munkaügyi regionális kollégiumok számát, elnevezését és illetékességi területét a 4. melléklet tartalmazza. 4. § (1) E törvény 2011. március 1-jén lép hatályba. (2) 10 A Zalaegerszegi Törvényszék és a Zalaegerszegi Törvényszék illetékességi területéhez tartozó helyi bíróságok határozata ellen a törvény hatálybalépését követ ően el őterjesztett jogorvoslatot bírálja el a Pécsi Ítél őtábla. 1 Kihirdetve: 2010. XII. 31. 2 Megállapította: 2012. évi CCXI. törvény 68. § (1). Hatályos: 2013. I. 1-től. 3 Módosította: 2011. évi CLXI. törvény 205. § (2) b). 4 Megállapította: 2012.
    [Show full text]