DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Cremation in Mexico 3,000 Years Ago

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Cremation in Mexico 3,000 Years Ago Human cremation in Mexico 3,000 years ago William N. Duncan*†, Andrew K. Balkansky‡, Kimberly Crawford‡, Heather A. Lapham‡, and Nathan J. Meissner‡ *Department of Anthropology, St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY 14618; and ‡Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901 Edited by Joyce Marcus, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, and approved February 22, 2008 (received for review November 10, 2007) Mixtec nobles are depicted in codices and other proto-historic ological contexts and osteological analyses of the burials, and documentation taking part in funerary rites involving cremation. evaluate the evidence based on known aspects of the Mixtec The time depth for this practice was unknown, but excavations at mortuary program. These early examples of cremation, along the early village site of Tayata, in the southern state of Oaxaca, with other factors, could reflect the emergence of ranked Mexico, recovered undisturbed cremation burials in contexts dat- society in the ancient Mixteca Alta and indicate that proto- ing from the eleventh century B.C. These are the earliest examples historic methods of marking social status had precursors of a burial practice that in later times was reserved for Mixtec kings extending back 3,000 years from the present. and Aztec emperors. This article describes the burial contexts and human remains, linking Formative period archaeology with eth- Archaeological Context nohistorical descriptions of Mixtec mortuary practices. The use of Survey and excavation indicate that Tayata was among the cremation to mark elevated social status among the Mixtec was largest villages of the preurban Formative period in the established by 3,000 years ago, when hereditary differences in Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, Mexico (18, 19). During the 2004 field rank were first emerging across Mesoamerica. season, the area adjacent to one of several excavated houses yielded the cremated burials along with diagnostic pottery and archaeology ͉ Mixtec ͉ bioarchaeology ͉ mortuary practices ͉ Mesoamerica radiocarbon samples dating from the late Early Formative to Middle Formative transition. During these phases (20–22), he Mixtec were one of the original Mesoamerican civiliza- Tayata expanded significantly in size and initiated construc- Ttions (1, 2), but until recently little was known about the tion of nonresidential buildings and public spaces. The time- archaeological precursors of Mixtec cities and states (3–5). The frame for these developments at Tayata in calendar years was discovery of cremated human burials (Ϸ1000 B.C.) from exca- the late twelfth through tenth centuries B.C., when significant vations at Tayata, an early village in the Mixteca Alta of Oaxaca, changes in social complexity were occurring in many parts of Mexico, suggests that status-marking funerary rites existed Mesoamerica (23–25). The Tayata cremations were associated centuries before urban states arose and millennia before histor- with a house and middens containing evidence for deer, dog, ical sources reference the cremation of Mixtec kings and Aztec and fish consumption, pottery firing, marine shell ornament emperors. Our study documents one of the key building blocks production, and access to exotic valuables such as obsidian. in the initial growth of social complexity: the time when early Dog remains were also interred with the cremations and found village societies divided into ranks and a person’s status in life in the middens in ways suggestive of ritual feasting (Fig. 4). was reflected at death, reinforcing the economic differentiation This area in and around the residential structure associated that was fundamental to early village life (6, 7). However, to with burials 1 and 2 stands apart from other contexts at Tayata understand the beginnings of those complex societies that given its higher frequencies of both dog and fish remains—a were the building blocks of later Mesoamerican civilizations, it pattern that also holds when the fauna recovered from this helps to begin with anthropological information from historical residence is compared with contemporaneous assemblages in periods. the Valley of Oaxaca. This specific residential area at Tayata One way that the proto-historic Mixtec marked social status contains twice as many dog remains and more than ten times was through burning the body of the deceased in various ways the number of fish bones as houses 16 and 17 at San Jose´ (8–11; Fig. 1). We define reduction of a corpse through Mogote, a relatively elite house complex dating to the late burning as cremation, typically to ash, although there is some Early Formative (26). latitude in the use of this term regarding how complete the Burial 1 had fragments of a dog skull, maxilla, mandible, left incineration must be (12). Postclassic Mixtec lords are shown and right humeri, left tibia, metapodial, and a phalanx included Ϸ being cremated in the codices, so we know that after A.D. with the burial and in layers above the human remains. The 1000 this practice was regarded as appropriate for nobles and distal portion of the left tibia exhibited cutmarks. Virtually all royalty. Mortuary burning for cremation could occur with surfaces of the dog remains were encrusted with the same ash ANTHROPOLOGY deceased lineage members who were deserving of veneration. concretions as the human remains and were not calcined or Likewise, the processing of ancestors’ remains to make carbonized (see supporting information (SI) Text). The ex- mummy bundles, violation of enemies’ mummy bundles, and ception was the left tibia fragment, which may account for why cannibalism of enemies all could involve burning the body of cutmarks were visible on it. The lack of redundancy among the deceased in different ways. Although well documented in skeletal elements and the consistency of age among the dog historical records (especially for Nahua peoples; 13), the time remains (all visible epiphyses were fused) indicate that only depth of differential burning and formal cremation among the one animal was represented. The associated dog and human ancient Mixtec was unknown (cf. 14, 15). In the Maya area, for example, it has long been documented that mortuary burning recorded in ethnohistorical sources (16) had roots stemming Author contributions: A.K.B. designed research; W.N.D., A.K.B., K.C., and N.J.M. performed back to the period between 300 B.C. and A.D. 300 (17). research; W.N.D., K.C., and H.A.L. analyzed data; and W.N.D., A.K.B., H.A.L., and N.J.M. The two burials from Tayata demonstrate that considerable wrote the paper. time depth for formal cremations is found in other areas of The authors declare no conflict of interest. Mesoamerica. In the best-documented example, the body was †To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail [email protected]. burned in situ, still articulated and undisturbed (Fig. 2). In the This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/ second example, the remains were also burned in situ, but were 0710696105/DCSupplemental. disturbed after burial (Fig. 3). Here, we describe the archae- © 2008 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.0710696105 PNAS ͉ April 8, 2008 ͉ vol. 105 ͉ no. 14 ͉ 5315–5320 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 A B Fig. 1. Plates 81 (A) and 82 (B) from the Codex Nuttall showing Mixtec cremation (figure created by modifying 11). remains suggest intentional burial as part of the same mortuary Valley of Oaxaca (26). Excavations of a midden north of the event. The cutmarks and skeletal elements represented from residence yielded a semicomplete skeleton of a single dog the dog might indicate feasting as part of the mortuary ritual, along with numerous isolated skeletal elements from at least but the alternative interpretation that the dog was a primary four other dogs. In addition to an unusually large number of offering included in the burial cannot be discounted or ruled dogs, the area in and around the residential structure associ- out. Burial 2 had only two dog canine teeth found in context. ated with burials 1 and 2 was also the only elite context to However, burial 2 was disturbed postmortem, which might contain fish remains in any frequency (just less than one fifth have destroyed other dog elements. of all identified taxa from the area). Analysis of the fish Food consumption patterns further mark this area of the site remains is ongoing. Several specimens appear to belong to the and its residents as being somewhat apart from others at the Perciforme order, which includes a variety of marine and site. The area in and around the residential structure associ- freshwater perch and perch-like species. Fish are extremely ated with burials 1 and 2 contained more than three times the rare (and generally absent) at other highland Mexican sites of number of animal remains compared with other elite areas at this period. Tayata. Domestic dog (Canis familiaris) and white-tailed deer We infer from these observations that the cremated indi- (Odocoileus virginianus) were the two most common mamma- viduals were members of a high-status household given their lian taxa represented, followed by cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus food consumption patterns, their participation in craft pro- spp.), jackrabbits (Lepus spp.), pocket gophers (Orthogeomys duction and exchange, the presence of the dogs and other grave spp.), and opossums (Didelphidae family). This area contained goods with the cremations (further described below), the a surprisingly large quantity of dogs. Dog remains were five formal arrangement of the burials, and their occurrence in a times more prevalent here than in other areas of the site. long-term elite residential area. This same residential zone was Butchery scars in the form of cut and hack marks were eventually covered with a public building and small plaza in identified on eight dog bones in the faunal assemblage from which various features were dedicated with dog and human the 2004 excavations at Tayata and all eight of these specimens crania.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 18 October 2018 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Caswell, E. and Roberts, B.W. (2018) 'Reassessing community cemeteries : cremation burials in Britain during the Middle Bronze Age (c. 16001150 cal BC).', Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society., 84 . pp. 329-357. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2018.9 Publisher's copyright statement: c The Prehistoric Society 2018. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, page 1 of 29 © The Prehistoric Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Incorporation of Human Cremation Ashes Into Objects and Tattoos in Contemporary British Practices
    Ashes to Art, Dust to Diamonds: The incorporation of human cremation ashes into objects and tattoos in contemporary British practices Samantha McCormick A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Sociology August 2015 Declaration I declare that the work in this thesis was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the University’s regulations and Code of Practice for Research Degree Programmes and all the material provided in this thesis are original and have not been published elsewhere. I declare that while registered as a candidate for the University’s research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy SINGED ………………………………… i ii Abstract This thesis examines the incorporation of human cremated remains into objects and tattoos in a range of contemporary practices in British society. Referred to collectively in this study as ‘ashes creations’, the practices explored in this research include human cremation ashes irreversibly incorporated or transformed into: jewellery, glassware, diamonds, paintings, tattoos, vinyl records, photograph frames, pottery, and mosaics. This research critically analyses the commissioning, production, and the lived experience of the incorporation of human cremation ashes into objects and tattoos from the perspective of two groups of people who participate in these practices: people who have commissioned an ashes creations incorporating the cremation ashes of a loved one and people who make or sell ashes creations.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Cremation Authorization Form
    NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF FUNERAL SERVICE STANDARD CREMATION AUTHORIZATION FORM NOTICE: THIS IS A LEGAL DOCUMENT. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT PROVISIONS CONCERNING CREMATION. THE PROCESS IS IRREVERSIBLE AND FINAL. READ THIS DOCUMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE SIGNING. _________________________________________________________________________________ Name of Individual for which cremation is being arranged (“Decedent”) ____________________ / __________________ / __________________ / _____________ Date of Birth Date of Death Time of Death Age Place of Death: _______________________________________________________________Hospice (Yes or No): __________ Medical Examiner’s Authorization Required (Yes or No):_________ Death Due to an Infectious Disease (Yes or No): _________ Individual Confirming Identity of Decedent: ______________________________________________________ / ____________________________________________________ (Typed / Printed Name) (Signature) A. The undersigned (hereinafter referred to as "Authorizing Agent{s}”) hereby certify, warrant, and represent that I/we have the full legal right and authority to authorize and arrange for the cremation and final disposition of _______________________________________________________(hereinafter referred to as "Decedent"); Authorizing Agent(s) is (are) not aware of any living person who has a superior right to that of Authorizing Agent(s) as set forth in G.S. 90-210.124; or, if there is another living person who does have a superior right to that of Authorizing Agent(s), Authorizing Agent(s) represent that
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture of Afterlife: Future Cemetery in Metropolis
    ARCHITECTURE OF AFTERLIFE: FUTURE CEMETERY IN METROPOLIS A DARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ARCHITECTURE MAY 2017 BY SHIYU SONG DArch Committee: Joyce Noe, Chairperson William Chapman Brian Takahashi Key Words: Conventional Cemetery, Contemporary Cemetery, Future Cemetery, High-technology Innovation Architecture of Afterlife: Future Cemetery in Metropolis Shiyu Song April 2017 We certify that we have read this Doctorate Project and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Architecture in the School of Architecture, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Doctorate Project Committee ___________________________________ Joyce Noe ___________________________________ William Chapman ___________________________________ Brian Takahashi Acknowledgments I dedicate this thesis to everyone in my life. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Professor Joyce Noe, for her support, guidance and insight throughout this doctoral project. Many thanks to my wonderful committee members William Chapman and Brian Takahashi for their precious and valuable guidance and support. Salute to my dear professor Spencer Leineweber who inspires me in spirit and work ethic. Thanks to all the professors for your teaching and encouragement imparted on me throughout my years of study. After all these years of study, finally, I understand why we need to study and how important education is. Overall, this dissertation is an emotional research product. As an idealist, I choose this topic as a lesson for myself to understand life through death. The more I delve into the notion of death, the better I appreciate life itself, and knowing every individual human being is a bless; everyday is a present is my best learning outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Archaeologies of Cremation Howard Williams, Jessica I
    Introduction Archaeologies of Cremation Howard Williams, Jessica I. Cerezo-Román, and Anna Wessman Williams, H., Cerezo-Román, J.I., and Wessman, A. (eds) 2017. Introduction: Archaeologies of Cremation, in J.I. Cerezo-Román, A. Wessman and H. Williams (eds) Cremation and the Archaeology of Death, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–24 Then the warriors began to kindle the greatest of funeral fires on the hill; woodsmoke ascended, dark over the flame, the soaring fire mingled with weeping – the raging wind subsided – until it had broken the body, hot at the heart. Depressed in soul, they lamented their grief, mourned the liege lord. Likewise the Geatish woman lamented for Beowulf, with bound hair, sang a sorrowful song, said often that she greatly feared evil days for herself, many slaughters, fear of the foe, humiliation and captivity. Heaven swallowed the smoke. Beowulf 3143–3155 (Owen-Crocker 2000: 91, 93) INTRODUCTION Four dramatic funerals punctuate the tenth- or eleventh-century Anglo-Saxon poem Beowulf; two involve the burning of the dead. While a Christian work to its core, the poem draws upon far older stories and at its very conclusion the poet provides a striking vision of an early medieval open-air cremation ceremony. Having died by the fire and poisonous bite of a dragon dwelling in a stone mound, the king of the Geats is cremated with treasures: helmets, swords, and coats of mail (Owen-Crocker 2000: 89). Before the raising of a burial mound upon a headland overlooking the sea, Beowulf ’s cremation is a focus of more than personal loss by mourners.
    [Show full text]
  • Grave Goods, Hoards and Deposits ‘In Between’I
    Spectrums of depositional practice in later prehistoric Britain and beyond: grave goods, hoards and deposits ‘in between’i Anwen Cooper, Duncan Garrow and Catriona Gibson Paper accepted for publication in Archaeological Dialogues 27(2), Dec 2020 Abstract This paper critically evaluates how archaeologists define ‘grave goods’ in relation to the full spectrum of depositional contexts available to people in the past, including hoards, rivers and other ‘special’ deposits. Developing the argument that variations in artefact deposition over time and space can only be understood if different ‘types’ of finds location are considered together holistically, we contend that it is also vital to look at the points where traditionally defined contexts of deposition become blurred into one another. In this paper, we investigate one particular such category – body-less object deposits at funerary sites – in later prehistoric Britain. This category of evidence has never previously been analysed collectively, let alone over the extended time period considered here. On the basis of a substantial body of evidence collected as part of a nationwide survey, we demonstrate that body-less object deposits were a significant component of funerary sites during later prehistory. Consequently, we go on to question whether human remains were actually always a necessary element of funerary deposits for prehistoric people, suggesting that the absence of human bone could be a positive attribute rather than simply a negative outcome of taphonomic processes. We also argue that modern, fixed depositional categories sometimes serve to mask a full understanding of the complex realities of past practice and ask whether it might be productive in some instances to move beyond interpretatively confining terms such as ‘grave’, ‘hoard’ and ‘cenotaph’.
    [Show full text]
  • Mummies and Mummification Practices in the Southern and Southwestern United States Mahmoud Y
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications Natural Resources, School of 1998 Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States Mahmoud Y. El-Najjar Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan Thomas M. J. Mulinski Chicago, Illinois Karl Reinhard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard El-Najjar, Mahmoud Y.; Mulinski, Thomas M. J.; and Reinhard, Karl, "Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States" (1998). Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications. 13. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in MUMMIES, DISEASE & ANCIENT CULTURES, Second Edition, ed. Aidan Cockburn, Eve Cockburn, and Theodore A. Reyman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 7 pp. 121–137. Copyright © 1998 Cambridge University Press. Used by permission. Mummies and mummification practices in the southern and southwestern United States MAHMOUD Y. EL-NAJJAR, THOMAS M.J. MULINSKI AND KARL J. REINHARD Mummification was not intentional for most North American prehistoric cultures. Natural mummification occurred in the dry areas ofNorth America, where mummies have been recovered from rock shelters, caves, and over­ hangs. In these places, corpses desiccated and spontaneously mummified. In North America, mummies are recovered from four main regions: the south­ ern and southwestern United States, the Aleutian Islands, and the Ozark Mountains ofArkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in Defiance of a Stylistic Stereotype: British Crematoria, Architecture
    In Defiance of a Stylistic Stereotype: British Crematoria, Architecture, Design & Landscape Hilary J. Grainger When awarding Telford Crematorium a West Midlands Regional Award in 2000 the R.I.B.A judges observed that A crematorium is a meeting point for complex human and cultural issues whose resolution into a successful building is potentially very difficult. Cremation was revived in the late nineteenth century as an alternative to burial, but did not claim widespread support until the second half of the twentieth century. It is therefore remarkable that it should have attained so rapidly cultural normality, indeed ritual dominance. By late 1990 the ratio of cremation to burial in Britain stood at 70% to 30%. Although one might not choose a crematorium as an architectural icon of modernity as one might a skyscraper, Britain’s 251 crematoria are essentially modern and they carry upon them the marks of modernity. They are modern in terms of the complexity of their technology, much of which can seem secretive. Cremation called for a new building type – one without architectural precedent and the crematorium was in that sense analogous to the early nineteenth century railway station. Although the first opened in 1889, at Woking, Surrey – the crematorium as a building type belongs more to the twentieth century. As cremation slowly gained acceptance in Britain, this progress was reflected in its architectural expression and each crematorium can be seen as a ‘symbol of social change’. 1 Paradoxically, despite the growing popularity of cremation, those using crematoria often find them unsatisfactory, their design uninspiring, banal and inconsequential.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global History of Paleopathology
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN TH E GLOBA L H ISTORY OF PALEOPATHOLOGY 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd i 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:58:03:58 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iiii 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN TH E GLOBA L H ISTORY OF PALEOPATHOLOGY Pioneers and Prospects EDITED BY JANE E. BUIKSTRA AND CHARLOTTE A. ROBERTS 3 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iiiiii 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN 1 Oxford University Press Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With o! ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland " ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © #$%# by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. %&' Madison Avenue, New York, New York %$$%( www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. CIP to come ISBN-%): ISBN $–%&- % ) * + & ' ( , # Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 000_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd0_JaneBuikstra_FM.indd iivv 11/31/2012/31/2012 44:03:59:03:59 PPMM OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRST-PROOF, 01/31/12, NEWGEN To J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cremation-2016.Pdf
    Cremation Cremation is the act of reducing a corpse to ashes by burning, generally in a crematorium furnace or crematory fire. In funerals, cremation can be an alternative funeral rite to the burial of a body in a grave. Modern Cremation Process The cremation occurs in a 'crematorium' which consists of one or more cremator furnaces or cremation 'retorts' for the ashes. A cremator is an industrial furnace capable of generating 870-980 °C (1600-1800 °F) to ensure disintegration of the corpse. A crematorium may be part of chapel or a funeral home, or part of an independent facility or a service offered by a cemetery. Modern cremator fuels include natural gas and propane. However, coal or coke was used until the early 1960s. Modern cremators have adjustable control systems that monitor the furnace during cremation. A cremation furnace is not designed to cremate more than one body at a time, which is illegal in many countries including the USA. The chamber where the body is placed is called the retort. It is lined with refractory brick that retain heat. The bricks are typically replaced every five years due to heat stress. © 2016 All Star Training, Inc. Page 1 Modern cremators are computer-controlled to ensure legal and safe use, e.g. the door cannot be opened until the cremator has reached operating temperature. The coffin is inserted (charged) into the retort as quickly as possible to avoid heat loss through the top- opening door. The coffin may be on a charger (motorized trolley) that can quickly insert the coffin, or one that can tilt and tip the coffin into the cremator.
    [Show full text]
  • Ötzi the Iceman Worksheets
    From mummies to mitochondria, skeletons to sequencing, Denisovans to DNA, molecules to murder…. Our human Inheritance Understanding our genetic ancestry & what makes us human featuring Ötzi the iceman Look at the mummy! Did you know: The Making of Ötzi’s Replica What type of images were used to make Ötzi’s ancient tattoos were the 3D print of Ötzi? made by making fine cuts in his skin and then rubbing charcoal in the cuts. Where in Italy is the real mummy stored? Ancient Ink Ötzi has 57 visible tattoos in the form of small lines and crosses. (4 cannot be seen.) Fatal Wound FIND and DRAW as many tattoos as you can on the illustration of the iceman’s mummy Evidence suggests that Ötzi was shot by (each line counts as a single tattoo; a cross an arrow, and this caused his death. would count as two). MARK the location of the arrow wound with an “X” on the Ötzi to the right. Damage CIRCLE the area of the mummy that is damaged. Did you know? The arrowhead that caused Ötzi to Did you know: bleed to death wasn’t This damage was caused discovered until 10 years after accidentally by a power tool the mummy was found. during the recovery of the mummy in 1991. Ötzi the iceman Read the panels! Did you know? Did you know? A paper published in 2016 All except one of Ötzi’s shows that Otzi also carried H. fingernails were missing; a pylori, a bacteria associated single detached nail was with stomach ulcers! found by his body! DNA Analysis Scientists identified DNA from different bacteria One of Ötzi’s fingernails had horizontal ridges and other living things.
    [Show full text]