Battle of Britain Blood Red Skies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 29
ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 29 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2003: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2003 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361-4231 Typeset by Creative Associates 115 Magdalen Road Oxford OX4 1RS Printed by Advance Book Printing Unit 9 Northmoor Park Church Road Northmoor OX29 5UH 3 CONTENTS BATTLE OF BRITAIN DAY. Address by Dr Alfred Price at the 5 AGM held on 12th June 2002 WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE LUFTWAFFE’S ‘TIP 24 AND RUN’ BOMBING ATTACKS, MARCH 1942-JUNE 1943? A winning British Two Air Forces Award paper by Sqn Ldr Chris Goss SUMMARY OF THE MINUTES OF THE SIXTEENTH 52 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD IN THE ROYAL AIR FORCE CLUB ON 12th JUNE 2002 ON THE GROUND BUT ON THE AIR by Charles Mitchell 55 ST-OMER APPEAL UPDATE by Air Cdre Peter Dye 59 LIFE IN THE SHADOWS by Sqn Ldr Stanley Booker 62 THE MUNICIPAL LIAISON SCHEME by Wg Cdr C G Jefford 76 BOOK REVIEWS. 80 4 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal -
How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British Courage and Capability Might Not Have Been Enough to Win; German Mistakes Were Also Key
How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British courage and capability might not have been enough to win; German mistakes were also key. By John T. Correll n July 1940, the situation looked “We shall fight on the beaches, we shall can do more than delay the result.” Gen. dire for Great Britain. It had taken fight on the landing grounds, we shall Maxime Weygand, commander in chief Germany less than two months to fight in the fields and in the streets, we of French military forces until France’s invade and conquer most of Western shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, predicted, “In three weeks, IEurope. The fast-moving German Army, surrender.” England will have her neck wrung like supported by panzers and Stuka dive Not everyone agreed with Churchill. a chicken.” bombers, overwhelmed the Netherlands Appeasement and defeatism were rife in Thus it was that the events of July 10 and Belgium in a matter of days. France, the British Foreign Office. The Foreign through Oct. 31—known to history as the which had 114 divisions and outnumbered Secretary, Lord Halifax, believed that Battle of Britain—came as a surprise to the Germany in tanks and artillery, held out a Britain had lost already. To Churchill’s prophets of doom. Britain won. The RAF little longer but surrendered on June 22. fury, the undersecretary of state for for- proved to be a better combat force than Britain was fortunate to have extracted its eign affairs, Richard A. “Rab” Butler, told the Luftwaffe in almost every respect. -
Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II. -
Messerschmitt Bf 109
Messerschmitt Bf 109 Bf 109 The most famous survivor, Messerschmitt Bf109G-2/Trop "Black 6", Wk Nr 10639; photo taken 1997 Duxford Air Show. Type Fighter Manufacturer Bayerische Flugzeugwerke Messerschmitt Designed by Willy Messerschmitt Maiden flight 28 May 1935 Introduced 1937 Retired 1945, Luftwaffe 1965, Spain Status Retired Primary users Luftwaffe Spanish Air Force Number built more than 33,000. Variants Avia S-199 Hispano Aviacion Ha 1112 1 German Airfield, France, 1941 propaganda photo of the Luftwaffe, Bf 109 fighters on the tarmac The Messerschmitt Bf 109 was a German World War II fighter aircraft designed by Willy Messerschmitt in the early 1930s. It was one of the first true modern fighters of the era, including such features as an all-metal monocoque construction, a closed canopy, and retractable landing gear. The Bf 109 was produced in greater quantities than any other fighter aircraft in history, with 30,573 units built alone during 1939-1945. Fighter production totalled 47% of all German aircraft production, and the Bf 109 accounted for 57% of all fighter types produced[1]. The Bf 109 was the standard fighter of the Luftwaffe for the duration of World War II, although it began to be partially replaced by the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 starting in 1941. The Bf 109 scored more aircraft kills in World War II than any other aircraft. At various times it served as an air superiority fighter, an escort fighter, an interceptor, a ground-attack aircraft and a reconnaissance aircraft. Although the Bf 109 had weaknesses, including a short range, and especially a sometimes difficult to handle narrow, outward-retracting undercarriage, it stayed competitive with Allied fighter aircraft until the end of the war. -
German Air Forces Facing Britain, 18 August 1940
German Air Forces Facing Britain 18 August 1940 German High Command: Reichsmarschall H. Goering Luftflotte 2 (In Brussels) Generalfeldmarschall A. Kesselring Fliegerkorps I: (in Beauvais) Kampfgruppe 1 Staff (5/0 - He 111)(in Rosiéres-en-Santerre)1 I Gruppe (23/5 - He111)(in Montdidier) II Gruppe (25/5 - He111)(in Montdidier) III Gruppe (19/9 - He111)(in Rosiéres-en- Santerre) Kampfgruppe 76 Staff (3/2 - Do 17)(in Cormeilles-en-Vexin) I Gruppe (26/3 - Do 17)(in Beuvais) II Gruppe (29/8 - Do 17)(in Creil) III Gruppe (21/5 - Do 17)(in Cormeilles-en-Vexin) Fliegerkorps II (in Ghent) Kampfgruppe 2 Staff (4/1 - Do 17)(in Arras) I Gruppe (21/7 - Do 17)(in Epinoy) II Gruppe (31/3 - Do 17)(in Arras) III Gruppe (24/5 - Do 17)(in Cambrai) Kampfgruppe 3 Staff (5/1 - Do 17)(in Le Culot) I Gruppe (24/10 - Do 17)(in Le Culot) II Gruppe (27/7 - Do 17)(in Antwerp/Deurne) III Gruppe (29/5 - Do 17)(in St. Trond) Kampfgruppe 53 Staff (3/2 - He 111)(in Lille) I Gruppe (17/2 - He 111)(in Lille) II Gruppe (20/1 - He 111)(in Lille) III Gruppe (21/5 - He 111)(in Lille) II/Stukagruppe 1 (26/10 - Ju 87)(in Pas-de-Calais) IV/Stukagruppe 1 (16/10 - Ju 87)(in Tramecourt)2 Erprobungsgruppe 210 (Me 108 & Me 110) Fleigerdivision 9: (in Soesterberg) Kampfgruppe 4 Staff (5/1 - He 111)(in Soesterberg) I Gruppe (20/10 - He 111)(in Soesterberg) II Gruppe (23/7 - He 111)(in Eindhoven) III Gruppe (25/10 - Ju 88)(in Amsterdam/Schiphol) I/Kampfgruppe 40 (FW 200) Kampfgruppe 100 (He 111) Jagdfleigerfüher 2 (in Wissant) Jagdgruppe 3 Staff (2/0 - Me 109)(in Samer) 1 Numbers are serviceable and unservicable aircraft. -
106 German and British Adaptations and the Context of German Strategic Decision Making in 1940-41 Williamson Murray Historians U
German and British Adaptations and the Context of German Strategic Decision Making in 1940-41 Williamson Murray Historians usually characterize the Battle of Britain as a great contest between the Luftwaffe and RAF Fighter Command that lasted from early July 1940 through to the massive daylight bombing of London during the first two weeks of September. The RAF is slightly more generous in placing the dates for the battle as occurring between 10 July and 15 October 1940.1 But the long and short of it is that the historical focus has emphasized the daylight, air-to-air struggle that took place over the course of three months: July, August, and September, 1940. This article, however aims at examining adaptation over a wider space of time – from early June 1940 through to the end of May 1941, when the Wehrmacht turned east with Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the Soviet Union and what the Luftwaffe’s chief of staff termed “a proper war.”2 It also aims at examining adaptation on both sides in the areas of technology, intelligence, operations, and tactics, rather than simply the contest between British fighters and German bombers and fighters – although the latter is obviously of considerable importance. Moreover, it will also examine the questions surrounding the larger strategic issues of German efforts to besiege the British Isles over the course of 1940 and the first half of 1941. The period of the Anglo-German war between the fall of France and the German invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941 is of particular interest because it involved the integration of a whole set of new technologies and concepts into conflict as well as the adaptation to a complex set of problems that those new technologies raised, the answers to which were largely ambiguous. -
WHO's WHO in the WAR in EUROPE the War in Europe 7 CHARLES DE GAULLE
who’s Who in the War in Europe (National Archives and Records Administration, 342-FH-3A-20068.) POLITICAL LEADERS Allies FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT When World War II began, many Americans strongly opposed involvement in foreign conflicts. President Roosevelt maintained official USneutrality but supported measures like the Lend-Lease Act, which provided invaluable aid to countries battling Axis aggression. After Pearl Harbor and Germany’s declaration of war on the United States, Roosevelt rallied the country to fight the Axis powers as part of the Grand Alliance with Great Britain and the Soviet Union. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USZ62-128765.) WINSTON CHURCHILL In the 1930s, Churchill fiercely opposed Westernappeasement of Nazi Germany. He became prime minister in May 1940 following a German blitzkrieg (lightning war) against Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France. He then played a pivotal role in building a global alliance to stop the German juggernaut. One of the greatest orators of the century, Churchill raised the spirits of his countrymen through the war’s darkest days as Germany threatened to invade Great Britain and unleashed a devastating nighttime bombing program on London and other major cities. (Image: Library of Congress, LC-USW33-019093-C.) JOSEPH STALIN Stalin rose through the ranks of the Communist Party to emerge as the absolute ruler of the Soviet Union. In the 1930s, he conducted a reign of terror against his political opponents, including much of the country’s top military leadership. His purge of Red Army generals suspected of being disloyal to him left his country desperately unprepared when Germany invaded in June 1941. -
Werksnummernliste Ju 52
www.Ju52archiv.de − Bernd Pirkl Weiter Krieg Wnr. Variante Kennzeichen Hersteller Erstbesitzer Zulassung Ergänzungen BNW Zulassungen überlebt FB Baltabol: 04.09.1935 FT-Flug, 25.09.1935 Nachflug , DVL-Testmaschine , 01.02.1938 Ankunft in Junkers Werft Leipzig zur Teilüberholung , 12/1938-10/1938 Lufthansa "Emil Schäfer" , 09/19369 zur Luftwaffe , 12.1941: 301 Ju 52/3mge D-ABUA ATG CB+EZ DVL/LUFTHANSA 09.1935 Luftverkehrsgruppe , 01.1942: Sanitätsflugbereitschaft 3 , 10.06.1942: Sanitätsflugbereitschaft 3 Artilleriebschuß auf dem Flug von Anissowo nach Gerodischtsche (100% zerstört) www.Ju52archiv.deFB Baltabol: 06.09.1935 Einflug, 27.09.1935 Nachflug , 12.1935: Umbau− mit 5 SesselnBernd mit Anschnallgurten sowie 8 Fenster fürPirkl Fliegerschule Neuruppin , 24.05.1943: 6./T.G.4 Insel Skyros Motlandung infolge 302 Ju 52/3mge D-ATYO ATG 06.09.1935 Brennstoffmangel (80% zerstört) FB Baltabol: 17.09.1935 Einflug, 07.10.1935 Nachflug , Reichseigenes Leihflugzeug der OMW Flugabteilung , Motorentestmaschine Mittelmotor Jumo 207/208/210/211/213 , FB Pohl: 12.04.1940 Überführung Rechlin-Dessau 303 Ju 52/3mge D-AMUY ATG NN+MA 17.09.1935 x , 05.1941: Überführungskommando Jüterbog , 23.12.1941: Überführungsstelle d. Lw. Jüterbog unfreiwillige Bodenberührung bei Klimbach (95% zerstört) 3 Tote: BF Uffz. Ludwig Piendel + 2 Zivilisten FB Baltabol: 02.10.1935 FT-Flug, 05.12.1935 Nachflug , FB Mühl: 22.+27.04.1938 Probeflug Staaken , FB Mühl: 02.05.1938 Probeflug Staaken , FB Mühl: 12.05.1938 Probeflug Staaken , FB Mühl: 19.05.1938 Probeflug 304 Ju 52/3mge WL-ADUO ATG D-ADUO LUFTWAFFE 30.09.1935 Staaken , FB Mühl: 25.05.1938 Probeflug Staaken , FB Mühl: 03.08.1938 Überlandflug Staaken-Bayreuth-Giebelstadt , FB Mühl: 05.08.1938 Probeflug Staaken , FB Mühl: 10.+13.+14.+24.+27.02.1939 Probeflug Staaken , FB Mühl: 16.+17.04.1939 Probeflug Staaken , F.F.S. -
FIAT BR.20 Cicogna "Battle of Britain"
Via Pradazzo, 6/b 40012 Calderara di Reno Bologna - Italy Conservare il presente indirizzo per Retain this address www.italeri.com futuro riferimento for future reference Made in Italy 1:72 scale No 1447 FIAT BR.20 Cicogna "Battle of Britain" EN FR The BR 20 “Cicogna” low wing medium bomber was developed by the Italian Le bombardier à ailes basses moyennes BR 20 « Cicogna » a été développé aircraft manufacturer Fiat during the 1930’s. It entered service in 1936 and par la société italienne Fiat dans les années trente. Il entre en service en was characterized by its metal frame and retractable landing gear. Modern 1936 et se caractérise par une structure métallique et un train d’atterrissage and fast for the period, it was deployed by the “Aviazione Legionaria” and rétractable. Moderne et rapide pour l’époque, il fut employé par l’aviation légionnaire et eut son baptême du feu en 1937 pendant la guerre civile 1940, the “Corpo Aereo Italiano”, consisting of the 13th and 43rd “Stormo espagnole. Pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il équipa plusieurs dépar- da Bombardamento” were similarly equipped with the BR-20. The “Stormi” tements de bombardement de la Regia Aeronautica. En septembre 1940, were stationed in Belgium and supported the Luftwaffe during the Battle of l’Air Corps italien est formé, composé des 13e et 43e escadres de bombar- dement équipées du bimoteur Fiat. Les services de vol étaient situés en exposed the BR-20’s limits, it was used for the duration of WW2 on various Belgique et ont participé, en soutien à la Luftwaffe allemande, à la bataille fronts by several Regia Aeronautica bomber squadrons. -
SECRET A. D. I. (K) Report No. 410/1945 the FOLLOWING
SECRET A. D. I. (K) Report No. 410/1945 THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM P/W AS THE STATEMENTS HAVE NOT AS YET BEEN VERIFIED, NO MENTION OF THEM SHOULD BE MADE IN INTELLIGENCE SUMMARIES OF COMMANDS OR LOWER FORMATIONS, NOR SHOULD THEY BE ACCEPTED UNTIL COMMENTED ON AIR MINISTRY INTELLIGENCE SUMMARIES OR SPECIAL COMMUNICATIONS. G.A.F.SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE IN THE WAR — IX Norway and the Northern Convoy Routes. 1. In this series dealing with various aspects of the G.A.F. Signals Intelligence service in the war, it had been intended to conclude with the eighth report. Since the issue of the first report, however, another P/W has become available who had a comprehensive knowledge of signals activities in the Norwegian area throughout the war. It has therefore been found possible to add the present report, the ninth and final in the series. 2. The gradual expansion of signals intelligence based in Norway, and the Allied activities which it covered, are followed in this account from year to year from the time of the invasion of Norway onwards. In order that ready comparisons of the extent of that expansion may be made each year is dealt with separately, and maps showing the situation at various intervals during the war are appended. 1940. NUCLEUS OF THE ORGANISATION. 3. Soon after the invasion of Norway in May 1940, signals intelligence personnel from W-22 at Husum were formed into a new unit and sent to operate at Oslo. This new unit was named W—Leit 5 and, subordinated to the Höherer Nafü of Luftflotte 5, formed the nucleus of the projected signals intelligence service in Norway; its initial strength was that of a Trupp, but by the autumn was to be increased to a Zug (platoon). -
© Osprey Publishing • © Osprey Publishing • HITLER’S EAGLES
www.ospreypublishing.com © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com HITLER’S EAGLES THE LUFTWAFFE 1933–45 Chris McNab © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS Introduction 6 The Rise and Fall of the Luftwaffe 10 Luftwaffe – Organization and Manpower 56 Bombers – Strategic Reach 120 Fighters – Sky Warriors 174 Ground Attack – Strike from Above 238 Sea Eagles – Maritime Operations 292 Ground Forces – Eagles on the Land 340 Conclusion 382 Further Reading 387 Index 390 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com INTRODUCTION A force of Heinkel He 111s near their target over England during the summer of 1940. Once deprived of their Bf 109 escorts, the German bombers were acutely vulnerable to the predations of British Spitfires and Hurricanes. © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com he story of the German Luftwaffe (Air Force) has been an abiding focus of military Thistorians since the end of World War II in 1945. It is not difficult to see why. Like many aspects of the German war machine, the Luftwaffe was a crowning achievement of the German rearmament programme. During the 1920s and early 1930s, the air force was a shadowy organization, operating furtively under the tight restrictions on military development imposed by the Versailles Treaty. Yet through foreign-based aircraft design agencies, civilian air transport and nationalistic gliding clubs, the seeds of a future air force were nevertheless kept alive and growing in Hitler’s new Germany, and would eventually emerge in the formation of the Luftwaffe itself in 1935. The nascent Luftwaffe thereafter grew rapidly, its ranks of both men and aircraft swelling under the ambition of its commander-in-chief, Hermann Göring. -
Bataille-D-Angleterre.Pdf
Bataille d'Angleterre 1 Bataille d'Angleterre Bataille d'Angleterre Photographie de propagande allemande représentant un chasseur britannique Supermarine Spitfire (capturé) aux prises avec un bombardier allemand Dornier Do 17. Informations générales Date Juillet 1940 ( Blitz: Jusqu'à Mai 1941 Lieu Sud de l'Angleterre Issue Victoire britannique Belligérants Royaume-Uni Reich allemand Royaume d'Italie Commandants Hugh Dowding Hermann Göring Forces en présence Royal Air Force Luftwaffe 1 963 avions Regia Aeronautica 4 074 avions Pertes 1 547 avions abattus, 1 887 avions abattus avec tous les équipages tués ou prisonniers 417 pilotes et 27 450 civils tués Seconde Guerre mondiale Batailles Bataille d'Angleterre 2 Front d'Europe de l'Ouest Campagnes du Danemark et de Norvège · Bataille de France · Bataille de Belgique · Bataille des Pays-Bas · Bataille d'Angleterre · Blitz · Opération Ambassador · Débarquement de Dieppe · Sabordage de la flotte française à Toulon · Campagne d'Italie · Libération de la Corse · Bataille de Normandie · Débarquement de Provence · 2e campagne de France · Opération Market Garden · Bataille du Benelux · Bataille de la forêt de Hürtgen · Bataille de l’Escaut · Poche de Breskens · Bataille d'Aix-la-Chapelle · Bataille de Bruyères · Bataille des Ardennes · Siège de Bastogne · Opération Bodenplatte · Opération Nordwind · Poche de Colmar · Campagne d'Allemagne (Traversée du Rhin · Opération Veritable · Opération Varsity · Poche de la Ruhr) · Bataille de Groningue · Insurrection de Texel Front d’Europe de l’Est Campagnes d'Afrique, du Moyen-Orient et de Méditerranée Bataille de l’Atlantique Guerre en Asie et dans le Pacifique Guerre sino-japonaise La bataille d'Angleterre (Battle of Britain) est un épisode essentiel de la Seconde Guerre mondiale, opposant de juillet 1940 à mai 1941 les armées de l'Air du Royaume-Uni et de l'Allemagne, soutenue par l'Italie, dans une campagne aérienne marquée par les bombardements de Coventry et de Londres, souvent désignée par l'expression « le Blitz ».