DOCSLIB.ORG

SWOT-Analysis LP- Aufbauwerk Region Leipzig Gmbh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SWOT-Analysis LP- Aufbauwerk Region Leipzig Gmbh 1 Joint regional analysis of the current situation/ SWOT-Analysis LP- Aufbauwerk Region Leipzig GmbH 2 Table of Content 0 Overview of DEMO-EC .............................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction of SWOT-Analysis within DEMO-EC ..................................................................................................... 5 2 Analysis of partner regions ....................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 PP2 – City of Leipzig .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Governance and Participation .................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.3 Car reduction ............................................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.4 Public transport ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.5 E-Mobility ................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.2 PP3 – Sinergija ................................................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 13 2.2.2 Governance and Participation ................................................................................................................ 18 2.2.3 Car reduction ........................................................................................................................................... 23 2.2.4 Public transport ....................................................................................................................................... 31 2.2.5 E-Mobility ................................................................................................................................................ 35 2.2.6 Behaviour change .................................................................................................................................... 37 2.2.7 References............................................................................................................................................... 39 2.3 PP4 - FAMCP .................................................................................................................................................... 40 2.3.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 40 2.3.2 Governance and Participation ................................................................................................................ 42 2.3.3 Car reduction ........................................................................................................................................... 48 2.3.4 Public transport ....................................................................................................................................... 51 2.3.5 E-Mobility ................................................................................................................................................ 53 2.3.6 Behavior change ...................................................................................................................................... 54 2.4 PP6 – Genoa .................................................................................................................................................... 56 2.4.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................................. 56 2.4.2 Governance and Participation ................................................................................................................ 60 2.4.3 Car reduction ........................................................................................................................................... 64 2.4.4 Public transport ....................................................................................................................................... 74 2.4.5 E-Mobility ................................................................................................................................................ 91 2.4.6 Behavior change .................................................................................................................................... 100 3 2.4.7 SWOT-Matrix ......................................................................................................................................... 104 2.4.8 References............................................................................................................................................. 109 2.5 PP7 – Lirebec ................................................................................................................................................. 112 2.5.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 112 2.5.2 Governance and Participation .............................................................................................................. 115 2.5.3 Car reduction ......................................................................................................................................... 118 2.5.4 Public transport ..................................................................................................................................... 121 2.5.5 E-Mobility .............................................................................................................................................. 124 2.5.6 Behaviour change .................................................................................................................................. 127 2.5.7 SWOT-Matrix ......................................................................................................................................... 130 2.5.8 References............................................................................................................................................. 133 2.6 PP8 – Milanówek ........................................................................................................................................... 134 2.6.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 134 2.6.2 Governance and Participation .............................................................................................................. 136 2.6.3 Car reduction ......................................................................................................................................... 139 2.6.4 Public transport ..................................................................................................................................... 141 2.6.5 E-Mobility .............................................................................................................................................. 142 2.6.6 Behavior change .................................................................................................................................... 143 2.6.7 SWOT-Matrix ......................................................................................................................................... 145 2.6.8 References............................................................................................................................................. 147 4 0 Overview of DEMO-EC Main objective is the development of Action plan, which will be reached through the following steps: 1. SWOT-Analysis: Comparison of partner regions of their strength and weaknesses 2. Identify best-practices and lessons learned from partner 3. Involvement of regional stakeholder 4. Development of recommendation for the action plan to improve policy instruments DEMO-EC SWOT-Analysis Best-practice Analysis Regional Stakeholder Identified needs, best practice learned, knowledge from the region Action Plan for policy instruments 5 1 Introduction of SWOT-Analysis within DEMO-EC The population of cities increases in Europe, which is a big challenge for the organization of transport in urban areas. For environmental friendly transport and to reduce CO2-consumption the alternatives for normal cars have to be introduced. A crucial aspect is to foster the combination of different environmental transport modes like public transport, cycling and also new arise mobility solutions. One way to combine these modes is a mobility management approach. The challenge here is that in city administrations a lack of instruments and unclear responsibilities exist. For successful implementation of mobility management also
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reti Tecnologiche
    PIANO URBANISTICO COMUNALE Descrizione Fondativa RETI TECNOLOGICHE Reti tecnologiche Rete fognaria e impianti di depurazione Normativa di riferimento: - D.Lgs. 152/06 Norme in materia ambientale. Parte Terza – Norme in materia di difesa del suolo e lotta alla Recepimento, aggiornamento e integrazione della descrizione fondativa del PTC provinciale desertificazione, di tutela delle acque dall’inquinamento e di gestione delle risorse idriche. - D.Lgs. 59/2005 Attuazione integrale della direttiva 96/61/CE relativa alla prevenzione e riduzione integrate dell’inquinamento. - L.R. 18/99 Adeguamento delle discipline e conferimento delle funzioni agli enti locali in materia di ambiente, Acqua difesa del suolo ed energia. - L.R. Norme in materia di valorizzazione delle risorse idriche e di tutela delle acque dal’’inquinamento. PTC provinciale PTC provinciale La normativa del settore acqua è incentrata sui seguenti grandi temi : la qualità delle acque (il Decreto Legislativo 21 Aprile 1999 n°152), la risorsa idrica (la Legge 5 Gennaio 1994 n°36 Legge Galli), il consumo umano (il Decreto del La normativa individua due tipi fondamentali di scarichi idrici: Presidente della Repubblica 24 Maggio 1988 n°236). Con l'approvazione del decreto legislativo 21 Aprile 1999 n°152 è - acque reflue industriali; avvenuta la riorganizzazione di gran parte della normativa vigente in materia di acque. - acque reflue domestiche. Attraverso il Testo Unico lo stato italiano recepisce due importanti direttive europee: la 91/271/CEE, concernente il L’ammissibilità degli scarichi idrici nei possibili ricettori è così disciplinata: trattamento delle acque reflue urbane, e la 91/676/CEE concernente la protezione delle acque dall’inquinamento - scarichi in pubblica fognatura : le acque reflue domestiche e assimilate sono sempre ammesse, alla sola provocato dai nitrati provenienti da fonti agricole.
    [Show full text]
  • Italferr S.P.A. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT
    Italferr S.p.A. (Translation from the Italian original which remains the definitive version) Italferr S.p.A. 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Annual Report 1 Italferr S.p.A. Italferr S.p.A. Single-member company managed and coordinated by Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane S.p.A. Share capital: €14,186,000, fully paid up Registered office: Via Vito Giuseppe Galati 71, 00155 Rome Tax code and company registration no.: 06770620588 REA no.: 541241 VAT number: 01612901007 Web site: www.italferr.it 2019 Annual Report 2 Italferr S.p.A. MISSION Italferr is the Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane group’s engineering company with over 30 years of consolidated experience in large infrastructural projects for traditional and high-speed railways, underground and road transport and the design of ports and stations in Italy and abroad. Its mission is to build infrastructure in accordance with high quality standards, deadlines and the budget, covering all technical and management activities for the planning, design, execution, inspection and commissioning of the works. Italferr offers innovative, high-tech services ranging from design to contracting, works management and supervision, inspection and commissioning of lines, stations and intermodal and interport hubs, project management, organisational consultancy, training and the transfer of specialised, avant-garde know-how. 2019 Annual Report 3 Italferr S.p.A. COMPANY OFFICERS Board of directors: Chairman Mario Serio Chief Executive Officer Aldo Isi Director Sabrina De Filippis 1 Director Claudia Eccher Director Sergio Salvio Board of statutory auditors: Chairwoman Roberta De Felice Standing statutory auditor Fabio Mastrangelo Standing statutory auditor Davide Rossetti Alternate statutory auditor Luca Provaroni Alternate statutory auditor Federica Silvestri INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 1 KPMG S.p.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Exploitation Plan
    D9.10 – Final Exploitation Plan Jorge Lpez (Atos), Alessandra Tedeschi (DBL), Julian Williams (UDUR), abio Massacci (UNITN), Raminder Ruprai (NGRID), Andreas Schmitz ( raunhofer), Emilio Lpez (URJC), Michael Pellot (TMB), Zden,a Mansfeldov. (ISASCR), Jan J/r0ens ( raunhofer) Pending of approval from the Research Executive Agency - EC Document Number D1.10 Document Title inal e5ploitation plan Version 1.0 Status inal Work Packa e WP 1 Deliverable Type Report Contractual Date of Delivery 31 .01 .20 18 Actual Date of Delivery 31.01.2018 Responsible Unit ATOS Contributors ISASCR, UNIDUR, UNITN, NGRID, DBL, URJC, raunhofer, TMB (eyword List E5ploitation, ramewor,, Preliminary, Requirements, Policy papers, Models, Methodologies, Templates, Tools, Individual plans, IPR Dissemination level PU SECONO.ICS Consortium SECONOMICS ?Socio-Economics meets SecurityA (Contract No. 28C223) is a Collaborative pro0ect) within the 7th ramewor, Programme, theme SEC-2011.E.8-1 SEC-2011.7.C-2 ICT. The consortium members are: UniversitG Degli Studi di Trento (UNITN) Pro0ect Manager: prof. abio Massacci 1 38100 Trento, Italy abio.MassacciHunitn.it www.unitn.it DEEP BLUE Srl (DBL) Contact: Alessandra Tedeschi 2 00113 Roma, Italy Alessandra.tedeschiHdblue.it www.dblue.it raunhofer -Gesellschaft zur Irderung der angewandten Contact: Prof. Jan J/r0ens 3 orschung e.V., Hansastr. 27c, 0an.0uer0ensHisst.fraunhofer.de 80E8E Munich, Germany http://www.fraunhofer.de/ UNIVERSIDAD REL JUAN CARLOS, Contact: Prof. David Rios Insua 8 Calle TulipanS/N, 28133, Mostoles david.riosHur0c.es
    [Show full text]
  • La Carta Consente Di Acquistare L'abbonamento Integrale Per La Provincia Di Genova Presso I Punti Vendita Indicati in Sede Di
    Assessorato ai Trasporti RICHIESTA DI UNA CARTA DI ACCESSO ALL’ABBONAMENTO INTEGRATO PER STUDENTI VALIDO NELLA PROVINCIA DI GENOVA Da consegnare allo studente e/o al genitore (contiene dichiarazione per il rilascio della carta di accesso all’abbonamento integrato, da ritirare ed inviare ad A.T.P.Esercizio) La carta consente di acquistare l’abbonamento integrale per la Provincia di Genova presso i punti vendita indicati in sede di compilazione del presente modulo. L’abbonamento integrato consente, sulla base delle scelte operate dall’utente , di utilizzare nel mese di validità e secondo i regolamenti di accesso previsti dai singoli vettori: - i servizi ferroviari TRENITALIA S.p.A. (secondo la tratta indicata) - i servizi autobus urbani AMT S.p.A. - i servizi urbani ed extraurbani ATP Esercizio - i servizi della ferrovia Genova-Casella. Hanno accesso al servizio e alle tariffe ridotte elencate nel presente documento gli studenti di ogni ordine e grado residenti nel territorio della Provincia di Genova (ivi compresi gli studenti della scuola superiore, delle scuole professionali e dell’università). Informativa ai sensi del D. Lgs. 30 giugno 2003, n. 196. In conformità all’art. 13 D. Lgs. 30 giugno 2003, n. 196 si informa: 1) che i dati personali forniti mediante la compilazione della presente domanda saranno oggetto di trattamento, in qualità di Titolare, da parte di Azienda Trasporti Provinciali S.p.A. (di seguito ATP), con sede in Carasco (GE), nel rispetto della Legge; 2) che il Titolare del trattamento dei dati è ATP Esercizio – Via
    [Show full text]
  • What Light Rail Can Do for Cities
    WHAT LIGHT RAIL CAN DO FOR CITIES A Review of the Evidence Final Report: Appendices January 2005 Prepared for: Prepared by: Steer Davies Gleave 28-32 Upper Ground London SE1 9PD [t] +44 (0)20 7919 8500 [i] www.steerdaviesgleave.com Passenger Transport Executive Group Wellington House 40-50 Wellington Street Leeds LS1 2DE What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review of the Evidence Contents Page APPENDICES A Operation and Use of Light Rail Schemes in the UK B Overseas Experience C People Interviewed During the Study D Full Bibliography P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review Of The Evidence P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review of the Evidence APPENDIX A Operation and Use of Light Rail Schemes in the UK P:\projects\5700s\5748\Outputs\Reports\Final\What Light Rail Can Do for Cities - Appendices _ 01-05.doc Appendix What Light Rail Can Do For Cities: A Review Of The Evidence A1. TYNE & WEAR METRO A1.1 The Tyne and Wear Metro was the first modern light rail scheme opened in the UK, coming into service between 1980 and 1984. At a cost of £284 million, the scheme comprised the connection of former suburban rail alignments with new railway construction in tunnel under central Newcastle and over the Tyne. Further extensions to the system were opened to Newcastle Airport in 1991 and to Sunderland, sharing 14 km of existing Network Rail track, in March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Urban Access Restrictions Final Report
    TREN/A4/103-2/2009 Study on Urban Access Restrictions Final Report Rome, December 2010 TREN A4/103-2/2009 1 Table of contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Objectives and methodology of the study ................................................................................................ 11 1.1 Desk Work ................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.2 Consultation .............................................................................................................................................. 15 1.2.1 City Survey ............................................................................................................................................. 15 1.2.2 Stakeholders Consultation ..................................................................................................................... 16 2. Review of Access Restriction Schemes in Europe ..................................................................................... 19 2.1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Download
    Promoting Electric Public Transport TRO LL EY Project Output 3.1.4: Transnational Manual on Advanced Energy Storage Systems – Part 1 - On-board energy storage systems for trolleybus systems as of September 2013 Prepared by: TEP Parma (external expert: EQC S.r.l.) Barnim Bus Company mbH (external expert: Cegelec Status: Final Version Dissemination level: Public Document The TROLLEY project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co financed by the ERDF TROLLEY Transnational Manual on Advanced Energy Storage Systems This document has been prepared by the authors in the framework of the TROLLEY project. PART A: On-board energy storage with supercapacitors in Parma Author: TEP S.p.A. PART B: Installation of the lithium-ion-battery for the combined on-board energy storage system for Europe’s first “Trolley-Hybrid-Bus”. Author: Barnimer Busgesellschaft mbH Any liability for the content of this publication lies with the authors. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained herein. TROLLEY Transnational Manual on Advanced Energy Storage Systems 2 of 85 TROLLEY Transnational Manual on Advanced Energy Storage Systems Table of Contents PART A (TEP) 1. Introduction and Overview 1.1 Trolleybuses in Parma 1.2 Energy Storage with Supercapacitors 1.3 Objectives 2. Optimising Energy Use 2.1 On-board Storage System 2.2 Market Overview (Example from Milan) 3. Analysis of tender offers 3.1 Overview 3.2 Supercaps 3.3 Start-up stage of the supercap-equipped vehicle 3.4 Braking stage of the supercap-equipped vehicle 3.5 Specific energy consumption 3.6 Supercap test in Milan ANNEX 1 - Data processing for the tests in Milan 3.7 Supercap test in Parma ANNEX 2 - Data processing for the tests in Parma PART B (BBG) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Talk Vol
    TRANSIT TALK VOL. 41 Edmonton Launches Battery Bus Service Eleven years after the City of Edmonton scrapped its 140 km electric trolleybus system in a backward move that will live in infamy, electric buses of sorts have returned to its streets. The new vehicles are battery buses, built by American manufacturer Proterra. Although only about half as energy efficient overall as trolleybuses, the vehicles are just as quiet and just as fume-free in the streets, where the noxious fumes from diesel buses have the greatest potential for harm. 21 of the new battery- electric buses debuted in August, with the remainder of an order of 40 vehicles to follow. Built in South Carolina, the buses run off long-range batteries, which are charged overnight using electricity from the grid at overhead charging stations in the garage. Edmonton is one of only a few cities in North America to employ this particular type of charging technology. The buses can travel up to 350 km on a single charge. The vehicles are considered a “long range battery bus”. Transit Branch Manager Eddie Robar explained: “We chose a long-range charge bus because that gives us effectively the same capability we have with our diesel buses today — we can do the same things with our electric bus. We get a full service day from that bus. We’re able to apply it to any route or any location in the city. We’re not restricted by where we need to charge the bus at what time of day. It goes back to the garage, it charges overnight and it’s back out for a full day of service the next day.” The 40-foot Proterra Catalyst E2 MAX vehicle boasts 660 kWh of onboard energy and Proterra’s DuoPower drivetrain.
    [Show full text]
  • VOYAGER State-Of-The-Art Report
    STATE-OF-THE-ART REPORT DELIVERABLE 2 CONTRACT N° : GTC2-2000-33029 ACRONYM: TITLE: Vehicle for Mobility Advancing Public Passenger Transport in Europe PROJECT CO-ORDINATOR: UITP - Union Internationale des Transports Publics PARTNERS: POLIS I.A.S.B.L. Socialdata - Institut für Verkehrs- und Infrastrukturforschung GmbH CERTU - Centre d’études sur les réseaux, les transports, l’urbanisme e les constructions publiques TIS Pt – Consultores em Transportes, Innovacão e Sistemas S.A. Rupprecht Consult – Forschung & Beratung GmbH AMT – Azienda Mobilita’ e Trasporti S.p.A. Bureau Zuidema bv Babtie spol. s.r.o. UWE - University of West England, Bristol, Faculty of Built Environment PROJECT START DATE: 01/09/2001 DURATION: 40 months Date of issue of this report : 24 November 2003 Project funded by the European Community under the ‘Competitive and Sustainable Growth’ Programme (1998-2002) Co-authors of the VOYAGER state-of-the-art report This state-of-the-art report was produced by Rupprecht Consult Forschung & Beratung GmbH with the collaboration of all VOYAGER Working Group leaders and the project co-ordinator. The quality control was carried out by the project co-ordinator (UITP). The contact details of the people that contributed to this report are given below. UNION INTERNATIONAL DES TRANSPORTS PUBLICS (UITP) Ms Andrea Soehnchen Rue Ste Marie 6 B-1080 Brussels Belgium Tel.: +32-2-663 6640 Fax: +32-2-660 1072 Email: [email protected] SOCIALDATA - INSTITUT FUER VERKEHRS- UND INFRASTRUKTURFORSCHUNG GmbH (Socialdata) Mr Franz Barta Mr Erhard Erl Hans-Grässel-Weg 1 81375 München Germany Tel.: +49-89-7108 1 Fax: +49-89-7164 20 Email: [email protected], [email protected] CENTRE D’ÉTUDES SUR LES RÉSEAUX, LES TRANSPORTS, L’URBANISME ET LES CONSTRUCTIONS PUBLIQUES (CERTU) Ms Maryvonne Dejeammes Mr Francois Rambaud 9 rue Juliette Récamier 39456 Lyon France Tel.: +33-4-7274 5830 Fax: +33-4-7274 5930 Email: [email protected], [email protected] TISPT, CONSULTORES EM TRANSPORTES, INOVACÃO E SISTEMAS S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • VAS Rapporto Ambientale Del PUMS
    PIANO URBANO DELLA MOBILITÀ SOSTENIBILE della Città Metropolitana di Genova VALUTAZIONE AMBIENTALE STRATEGICA Rapporto Ambientale ai sensi degli artt. 13 e 14 del D.lgs 152/2006 e s.m.i. e degli artt. 8 e 9 della L.R. 32/2012 e s.m.i. Gennaio 2019 Rapporto Ambientale del PUMS della Città Metropolitana di Genova Gruppo di Lavoro Integrato : Città Metropolitana di Genova Direttore Generale - Dott. Piero Araldo (Coordinamento) Direzione Generale - Ufficio Pianificazione strategica Direzione Ambiente Direzione Territorio e Mobilità Comune di Genova Direzione Urbanistica Direzione Ambiente Direzione Mobilità Contributi specialistici per la valutazione di incidenza ambientale Direzione Ambiente - Città Metropolitana di Genova Direzione Ambiente - Comune di Genova Con il supporto scientifico di: Università degli Studi di Genova - C.I.E.L.I. Centro Italiano di Eccellenza sulla Logistica i Trasporti e le Infrastrutture Prof. Enrico Musso Prof.ssa Ilaria Delponte, Prof. Riccardo Bozzo, Prof. Davide Giglio, Ing. Francesco Rebora, Claudia Burlando, Angela Bruzzone, Francesca Romana Carlone, Paolo Gallorini, Serena Piazzo 3 Rapporto Ambientale del PUMS della Città Metropolitana di Genova INDICE PREMESSA ............................................................................................................................................... 6 1. QUADRO NORMATIVO .................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Normativa di riferimento per la Valutazione Ambientale Strategica
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on Elements of Work Plan
    Ref. Ares(2017)3520569 - 12/07/2017 TEN-T Core Network Corridors Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor 2nd Phase Final Report on the Elements of the Work Plan Final version: 12.07.2017 12 July 2017 1 Study on Scandinavian-Mediterranean TEN-T Core Network Corridor 2nd Phase (2015-2017) Final Report on the Elements of the Work Plan Information on the current version: The draft final version of the final report on the elements of the Work Plan was submitted to the EC by 22.05.2017 for comment and approval so that a final version could be prepared and submitted by 06.06.2017. That version has been improved with respect to spelling and homogeneity resulting in a version delivered on 30.06.2017. The present version of the report is the final final version submitted on 12.07.2017. Disclaimer The information and views set out in the present Report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained herein. 12 July 2017 2 Study on Scandinavian-Mediterranean TEN-T Core Network Corridor 2nd Phase (2015-2017) Final Report on the Elements of the Work Plan Table of contents 1 Executive summary ............................................................................... 13 1.1 Characteristics and alignment of the ScanMed Corridor .............................. 13 1.2 Traffic demand and forecast ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Guidance: Detailed Coverage for Supported Transit Systems
    Urban Guidance: Detailed coverage for supported transit systems Andorra .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Argentina ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Australia ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Austria .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Brazil ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Chile ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 Colombia .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Croatia .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]