EDTO Module 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EDTO Module 3 EDTO Workshop Module N° 3 –Approval Course Structure Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Course introduction Basic concepts Approval Module 4 Module 5 Module 6 Aircraft Certification Maintenance Flight Operations Considerations Considerations Considerations Module 7 Module 8 Module 9 Implementing Continued Summary EDTO Regulations Surveillance Module 10 Assessment ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process 2 Objectives At the end of this module, participants will be able to understand the EDTO approval process and related major requirements ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process 3 Outline Application for EDTO operational approval Required operator EDTO policy documentation and training programs Review EDTO capability of the aircraft and if applicable conduct validation of EDTO certification of the aircraft Evaluate operator EDTO program compliance (review gates) Conduct final EDTO validation Issue operational approval ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process 4 Agenda The 2 steps of the EDTO Approval Process EDTO Approval: Aircraft Type Design assessment EDTO operational approval of the Operator – Required process elements – Accelerated approval vs. In-service approval – Approval status of current EDTO operators Conclusions ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process 5 EDTO Approval ETOPS is a Two Step Process Manufacturer must perform the Type Design Assessment of the airframe/engine combination and get it approved / validated by the Type Design Authority. The Airplane is Ready Airline operators must get Operational Approval from its National Authority to fly ETOPS The Airline is Ready ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 6 Agenda The 2 steps of the EDTO Approval Process EDTO Approval: Aircraft Type Design assessment EDTO operational approval of the Operator – Required process elements – Accelerated approval vs. In-service approval – Approval status of current EDTO operators Conclusions ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process 7 EDTO Type Design Assessment Airplanes with more than 2 engines As per ICAO decision (State Letter Ref. SP 59/4.1-11/8 of June 2011), the following applies to Airplanes with more than 2 engines engaged in EDTO operations : The capability of Time Limited System must be considered at dispatch for the purpose of identification and selection of en- route alternates (verification of weather) This may require an assessment of the aircraft design to identify / confirm the capability of relevant Time Limited System(s) Usually, it is the capability of the Cargo Fire Suppression system which defines the applicable limitation for EDTO As per ICAO standards, there are no additional maintenance requirements nor additional certification requirements Note: a given State may require an EDTO certification provided related design and reliability criteria have been defined ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 8 Certification & operational approval To operate beyond threshold, two conditions must be met: Aircraft Certification Operational Approval (may not be required under certain conditions) Applicant: Applicant: MANUFACTURER OPERATOR Annex 8 AMC 20-6 FAR 25 Annex 6 CAT-OP FAR 121 Prime Certification Authority + Validation Authorities NAA Rules AMC 20-6 AC 120-42B National Aviation Authority Must be obtained before approval of Operator for EDTO ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 9 Elements of EDTO assessment Compliance demonstration: Responsibility of the Operator ETOPS Operational Approval Operations Maintenance Design Reliability Compliance demonstration: Responsibility of the Manufacturer ETOPS Type Design & Reliability Approval ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 10 Elements of EDTO assessment Compliance demonstration: Responsibility of the Operator ETOPS Operational Approval Operations Maintenance 2 1 Design Reliability Compliance demonstration: Responsibility of the Manufacturer ETOPS Type Design & Reliability Approval ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 11 EDTO Type Design Approval Examples of regulatory material for ETOPS Type Design & Reliability Approval : ICAO Annex 8 AMC 20-6 PART 21 PART 25 PART 33 Additional Only the paragraphs These FAA ETOPS Certification rules have guidance in related to ETOPS Type superseded AC 120-42A in 2007 Design & Reliability Additional guidance in new AC for Part 25 still A/W Manual 9760 assessment pending 1 Design Reliability Compliance demonstration: Responsibility of the Manufacturer EDTOType Design & Reliability Approval ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 12 EDTO Type Design Approval Twin engine aircraft Airplane Models Approved Separately Each airframe/engine combination Each diversion time (120, 180, beyond 180…) for each combination Derivative airplanes require additional approval ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 13 Boeing FAA Historical Type Design Approvals for EDTO Approval History Through the End of 1999 ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 14 Boeing Airplane/Engine Type Design Approvals for EDTO ETOPS Operators Counts As of August 2014 FAA ETOPS Type Design Approvals Beyond Total at Airplane Engine Type 120-minutes 180-minutes > 180-minutes 180 min 207 min 180 min any level 717 -200 BR715 75-min May 2004 No 717 ETOPS operators -200 JT8D December 1985 0 -3/4/500 CFM56-3 September 1990 8 737 -6/7/800 December 1998 September 1999 15 48 -900 CFM56-7 April 2001 1 1 -900ER April 2007 1 2 RB211-535C July 1990 July 1990 0 0 RB211-535E4 December 1986 July 1990 19 33 -200 RB211-535E4-B September 1992 September 1992 4 4 PW2037/PW2040 March 1990 April 1992 5 10 757 RB211-535E4/E4-B September 1992 September 1992 1 1 -200 PF PW2037/PW2040 July 1990 April 1992 0 1 RB211-535E4/E4-B January 1999 January 1999 1 1 -300 PW2037/2040/2043 June 2002 1 1 JT9D-7R4D/E May 1985 April 1990 3 5 CF6-80A/A2 August 1985 April 1989 4 4 CF6-80C2 PMC May 1988 April 1989 11 11 -200/300 CF6-80C2 FADEC March 1991 May 1993 22 31 PW4000 April 1990 July 1993 19 29 767 RB211-524H March 1991 March 1993 1 2 CF6-80C2 PMC June 2008 1 1 -300BCF CF6-80C2 FADEC October 2009 0 0 -300F CF6-80C2 FADEC October 1995 6 7 -400 CF6-80C2 FADEC July 2000 2 2 PW4000 May 1995 3 1 6 -200 GE90 October 1996 2 0 2 Trent 800 October 1996 3 0 3 PW4000 March 1997 February 2013 9 4 0 10 -200ER GE90 February 1997 November 2011 12 3 0 15 Trent 800 April 1997 10 4 13 777 -200LR GE90-110B/115B February 2006 November 2011 7 2 0 9 F GE90-110B/115B February 2009 November 2011 9 1 0 12 PW4090 June 1998 1 2 -300 PW4098 April 2000 1 1 Trent 800 May 1998 3 4 -300ER GE90-115B March 2004 November 2011 27 8 1 27 Trent 1000 August 2011 May 2014 6 1 0 6 -8 GEnx-1B March 2012 May 2014 13 6 0 14 Trent 1000 June 2014 June 2014 1 0 0 1 787 -9 GEnx-1B August 2014 August 2014 145 Boeing ETOPS * Many airlines are approved for ETOPS on two or more models, but are only counted once in the total. Operators* EDTO Design Capabilities and Objectives Summary 180 min 330 min 737NG 737 MAX 757 207 min 767 747-8I 777-300ER, 200LR * * 207 for EASA (330 pending) 777 Freighter * * 207 for EASA (330 pending) 777-300 777-200ER/GE * * 207 for EASA (330 pending) 777-200ER/PW * * 207 for EASA (330 pending) 777-200ER/RR * 207 for EASA (330 pending) 787-8 787-9 Current capability Future objective ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 16 Airbus EDTO experience Airbus has over 35 years of ETOPS experience: A300 B2/B4 . 1976: 90 min (ICAO rule) operations with A300B2/B4 - North Atlantic - Bay of Bengal - Indian Ocean A310-200 . 1985: 90 min ‘ETOPS’ operations - A310-200 -SIA . 1986: 120 min ETOPS Type Design & Reliability approvals A300-600 - A310-200 / A310-300 / A300-600 . 1990: 180 min ETOPS Type Design & Reliability approvals - A310-200 / A310-300 / A300-600 / A300-600R A310-300 - First FADEC engine ETOPS approval (120 min - A310-324) ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 17 Airbus EDTO experience Airbus has over 35 years of ETOPS experience (Cont’d): A320 • 1991: first Fly-By-Wire aircraft to be approved for ETOPS – A320 (all models) • 1994 : first accelerated ETOPS approval program A330-300 – A330-300 - ETOPS approved 5 months after E.I.S. • direct service experience was less than 1,000 FH • 1995: first 4 engine aircraft compliance to ETOPS rule A340 – A340 - Canadian Certification • 1998 : A330-200 ETOPS approval – 180 min at E.I.S. (RR: February 99) • 2009: first ETOPS>180 min certification A330-200 – A330 (all pax models) - Max DT capability corresponds to ~240 min (ISA, still air) ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process 18 Airbus EDTO experience As of 2014: . Airbus ETOPS twins have accumulated over 13 million ETOPS FH ETOPS capabilities of Airbus aircraft (EASA Approvals) . A300B2/B4 capable of 90 min D.T. A310/A300-600 : 180 min D.T. - A300-600ST (“Beluga”): 180 min D.T. A320/A319/A321/A318 : 180 min D.T. A330 (pax models): ETOPS>180 min D.T. - All A330-200 and new -300 models have been approved for 180 min at E.I.S. - A330-200F (2 models) are approved for 180 min ETOPS ICAO EDTO Course - Approval Process Page 19 A330 EDTO certification Certification status Model Basic Intermix EASA FAA A330-201 CF6-80E1A2 - >180 180 CF6-80E1A4 A330-202 CF6-80E1A2 >180 180 A330 CF6-80E1A4/B A330-203 CF6-80E1A3 - >180 180 General A330-301 CF6-80E1A2 - >180 180 Electric CF6-80E1A4 A330-302 - >180 180 CF6-80E1A4/B A330-303 CF6-80E1A3 - >180 180 PW4168A (incl. –1D) PW4168A A330-223 >180 180 A330-300 PW4170 (incl. –1D) PW4170 A330-223F - 180 180 A330 PW4168A-1D PW4164 A330-321 - >180 180 Pratt & PW4164-1D Whitney PW4168 A330-322 - >180 180 PW4168-1D PW4168A (incl. –1D) PW4168A A330-323 >180 180 PW4170 (incl. –1D) Trent 772B-60 A330-243 - >180 180 A330-200
Recommended publications
  • Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning of Spoken Dialogue Strategies
    Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning of Spoken Dialogue Strategies Dave Toney I V N E R U S E I T H Y T O H F G E R D I N B U Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Communicating and Collaborative Systems School of Informatics University of Edinburgh 2007 Abstract From a system developer’s perspective, designing a spoken dialogue system can be a time-consuming and difficult process. A developer may spend a lot of time anticipating how a potential user might interact with the system and then deciding on the most appropriate system response. These decisions are encoded in a dialogue strategy, essentially a mapping between anticipated user inputs and appropriate system outputs. To reduce the time and effort associated with developing a dialogue strategy, recent work has concentrated on modelling the development of a dialogue strategy as a sequential decision problem. Using this model, reinforcement learning algorithms have been employed to generate dialogue strategies automatically. These algorithms learn strategies by interacting with simulated users. Some progress has been made with this method but a number of important challenges remain. For instance, relatively little success has been achieved with the large state representations that are typical of real- life systems. Another crucial issue is the time and effort associated with the creation of simulated users. In this thesis, I propose an alternative to existing reinforcement learning methods of dialogue strategy development. More specifically, I explore how XCS, an evolutionary reinforcement learning algorithm, can be used to find dialogue strategies that cover large state spaces. Furthermore, I suggest that hand-coded simulated users are sufficient for the learning of useful dialogue strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Time Departure FLIGHTS from SABİHA GÖKÇEN AIRPORT
    Wings of Change Europe Master of Ceremony Montserrat Barriga Director General European Regions Airline Association (ERA) Wings of Change Europe – 13/14 November 2018 – Madrid , Spain Wifi Hilton Honors Password APMAD08 Wings of Change Europe – 13/14 November 2018 – Madrid , Spain Welcome remarks Luis Gallego CEO Iberia Wings of Change Europe – 13/14 November 2018 – Madrid , Spain Welcome to Madrid Iberia in figures Flying since Member of Three Business: Airline Maintenance 1927 3 Handing Employees Incomes 2017 €376 Operating profits 2017 17.500 €4.85 Billion (+39% vs 2016) What does Iberia bring to Madrid? 17,500 109 23,000,000 142 employees International aircraft destinations passengers 50% 5,5% 50,000 GDP Indirect Madrid Airport employees Our strategic roadmap The 2013 2014 2017 2012 future Transformation Plan de Futuro Plan de Futuro Struggling Transforming Plan Phase 2 for survival to reach excellence On the verge of Loses cut by half Back to profitability The most punctual airline bankruptcy in the world Four star Skytrax Highest operational profits in Iberia’s 90 years of history 2018 had significant challenges for IB. How are we doing? Financial People Results Customer Muchas gracias The Value of Aviation & importance of Competitiveness for Spain Jose Luis Ábalos Minister of Public Works Government of Spain Wings of Change Europe – 13/14 November 2018 – Madrid , Spain The European Commission’s perspective on the future of aviation in the EU and its neighboring countries Henrik Hololei Director General for Mobility & Transport European
    [Show full text]
  • 2 0 0 9 Yearbook
    Tourism Yearbook 2009 Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture Republic of Maldives © Copyright Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture, 2009 Tourism Yearbook 2009 ISBN 99915-95-45-7 First Print: May 2009 Produced and Published by Statistics & Research Section Ministry of Tourism Arts and Culture 6th Floor, ADK Tower Ameer Ahmed Magu Male’ 20094 Republic of Maldives Tel: +960 330 4952 Fax: +960 330 4951 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.tourism.gov.mv Data Compilation & Verifi cation: Mariyam Sharmeela, Silma Ali, Aishath Yamna Concept: Mariyam Sharmeela, Aminath Fazla Layout & Design: Mariyam Sharmeela Editor: Moosa Zameer Hassan Cover Photos: Ahmed Shareef Nafees, Muhamed (Muha), Moosa Easa, Caroline Von Tuemplin, Mohamed Azmeel, Mohamed Musaaidh, Mohamed Siraj (Sidey) Inside Photos: Shazeen Abdul Samad, Andrea Pohlman, Caroline Von Tuemplin, Shaahina Ali Printed by: M7 Print Private Limited Welcome to the Tourism Yearbook 2009! It is with great pleasure that I present to you this annual publication of Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture. Undoubtedly tourism is a very dynamic sector and timely dissemination of statistics is vital due to the signifi cance of the industry. With this in mind, the Tourism Yearbook is published with the objective of providing comprehensive and latest statistical information on tourism industry, to the relevant Government authorities as well as private sector, institutions and individuals. This annual publication highlights key tourism indicators of the Maldives for the past fi ve years and provides information on the performance of the Maldives tourism industry in 2008. Year 2008 had been an eventful year for the Maldives, in terms of politics within the country as well as economic changes in the Maldives and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Neil Cloughley, Managing Director, Faradair Aerospace
    Introduction to Faradair® Linking cities via Hybrid flight ® faradair Neil Cloughley Founder & Managing Director Faradair Aerospace Limited • In the next 15 years it is forecast that 60% of the Worlds population will ® live in cities • Land based transportation networks are already at capacity with rising prices • The next transportation revolution faradair will operate in the skies – it has to! However THREE problems MUST be solved to enable this market; • Noise • Cost of Operations • Emissions But don’t we have aircraft already? A2B Airways, AB Airlines, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen London Express, ACE Freighters, ACE Scotland, Air 2000, Air Anglia, Air Atlanta Europe, Air Belfast, Air Bridge Carriers, Air Bristol, Air Caledonian, Air Cavrel, Air Charter, Air Commerce, Air Commuter, Air Contractors, Air Condor, Air Contractors, Air Cordial, Air Couriers, Air Ecosse, Air Enterprises, Air Europe, Air Europe Express, Air Faisal, Air Ferry, Air Foyle HeavyLift, Air Freight, Air Gregory, Air International (airlines) Air Kent, Air Kilroe, Air Kruise, Air Links, Air Luton, Air Manchester, Air Safaris, Air Sarnia, Air Scandic, Air Scotland, Air Southwest, Air Sylhet, Air Transport Charter, AirUK, Air UK Leisure, Air Ulster, Air Wales, Aircraft Transport and Travel, Airflight, Airspan Travel, Airtours, Airfreight Express, Airways International, Airwork Limited, Airworld Alderney, Air Ferries, Alidair, All Cargo, All Leisure, Allied Airways, Alpha One Airways, Ambassador Airways, Amber Airways, Amberair, Anglo Cargo, Aquila Airways,
    [Show full text]
  • Identificazione E Affidabilità Delle Aerolinee Nell'odierno
    Identificazione e affidabilità delle aerolinee nell’odierno scenario del trasporto aereo Stante la difficoltà di “conoscere” l’aerolinea con cui si volerà, può almeno l’utente avere la certezza che le autorità preposte abbiano svolto idonea opera di vaglio e controllo? Uno dei principali problemi con cui oggi si deve confrontare l’utente del trasporto aereo è indubbiamente costituito dall’identità del vettore che si prenderà carico di trasportarlo alla sua destinazione. Una volta, fino a qualche anno fa, questo problema davvero non esisteva. In Italia in particolare, chi decideva di volare sapeva abbastanza di Alitalia, Itavia, Meridiana per poter prendere con cognizione di causa la sua decisione; parlare di scelta del vettore sarebbe errato, in quanto i collegamenti che questi operatori esercitavano raramente erano in sovrapposizione e come tali in concorrenza fra loro. Ma oggi il problema è molto peggiorato e usando questi termini non necessariamente intendiamo far riferimento all’aspetto della safety, che pure ha la sua valenza, quanto all’altro argomento assai più elementare di conoscere, nel senso di aver almeno sentito parlare del vettore che ci porterà a destinazione. L’esempio più eclatante di quanto stiamo dicendo è dato dal recente caso della Flash Air e dell’incidente di Sharm El Sheikh. Non fraintendiamo: abbiamo già scritto e ripetiamo anche in questa occasione, che fintanto che la commissione di inchiesta non conclude la sua indagine è assolutamente sbagliato –come purtroppo è accaduto- sparare a zero a priori contro la compagnia aerea. Il discorso vale per questo come per ogni altro malaugurato incidente che si dovesse verificare.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 Acquisition and Operation of Durham Tees Valley Airport Overview
    Appendix 2 Acquisition and Operation of Durham Tees Valley Airport Overview This Report seeks approval for the Tees Valley Combined Authority (“the Combined Authority”) to acquire the 89% shareholding of Peel Holdings Limited (“Peel”) in Durham Tees Valley Airport Limited (“DTVAL”), and separately, to enter into a joint venture arrangement with its preferred operator covering the ongoing ownership and operation of Durham Tees Valley Airport (“the Airport”) on the terms set out below. Decision 1. Cabinet is recommended to mandate the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Mayor and Cabinet Member for Transport, to:- (i) Conclude an agreement with Peel whereby the Combined Authority acquires the 89% shareholding held by Peel in DTVAL (“the Peel Shareholding”) for a consideration of £40 million (“the Acquisition”); (ii) Separately, and on the basis that the Combined Authority finalises legal arrangements with the preferred operator on the terms set out in this report, to conclude:- a. a Joint Venture Agreement with the preferred operator pursuant to which the preferred operator would take a share of no more than 25% of the Combined Authority’s equity interest in the airport as an incentive mechanism to reduce ongoing losses. This would offer limited dividends to the preferred operator in the longer term to focus on the Combined Authority’s investment being recovered once the airport is in profit. This arrangement would be subject to the preferred operator funding its share of the losses in the interim; and b. an Operating Contract pursuant
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport: Quarterly Report No.17
    ATR launched upgraded versions of the ATR42 and 72, namely the -600 series with updated avionics among other changes. This is on the back of the buoyancy in the turboprop market seen over the last couple of years - represented above by ATR 42 500 series operated by Contact Air, a member of Lufhansa Regional. AIR TRANSPORT: QUARTERLY REPORT NO.17 4th QUARTER 2007 (October to December) 1 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................2 2. HIGHLIGHTS AND KEY DEVELOPMENTS.........................................................................3 2.1 REGULATORY.........................................................................................................................3 2.2 AIRLINES................................................................................................................................4 2.3 AIRPORTS.............................................................................................................................12 2.4 SAFETY AND SECURITY ........................................................................................................15 2.5 ATM....................................................................................................................................16 2.6 MANUFACTURERS ................................................................................................................16 2.7 THE ENVIRONMENT ..............................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Table 10.7 : AIR TRANSPORT MOVEMENTS at MALE
    Table 10.7 : AIR TRANSPORT MOVEMENTS AT MALE' INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BY AIRLINE, CROSS0CLASSIFIED BY PASSENGER, CARGO AND MAIL,1987 - 2015 1987 Passengers Cargo (kg) Mail (kg) Airline In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 144,254 134,639 3,067,489 2,959,761 107,728 48,726 21,215 27,511 International Scheduled 87,018 78,107 2,875,293 2,775,552 99,741 48,266 21,088 27,178 Air lanka 36,602 35,630 1,672,128 1,624,418 47,710 21,670 18,221 3,449 P.I.A 2,496 2,508 64,482 62,614 1,868 590 568 22 Royal Nepal Airlines 81 30 210 210 0 2 2 0 Singapore Airlines 35,282 35,289 327,655 286546 41,109 6,326 1,304 5,022 Emirates 2,955 2,924 324,448 321,647 2,801 25 22 3 Indian Airlines 9,602 1,726 486,370 480,117 6,253 19,653 971 18,682 International Charter 54,358 53,720 185,535 180,679 4,856 0 0 0 Alitalia 6,962 6,995 74,923 74,923 0 0 0 0 Austrian Airline 677 509 0 0 0 0 0 0 Balair 11,545 11,376 5,738 5,738 0 0 0 0 Condor 16,394 16,458 93,867 89,011 4,856 0 0 0 Lauda Air 380 234 0 0 0 0 0 0 L.T.U 16,230 16,715 10,472 10,472 0 0 0 0 Monarch Airlines 193 0 185 185 0 0 0 0 Sterling Airways 1,977 1,433 350 350 0 0 0 0 Other international 789 795 1,910 1,910 0 0 0 0 Domestic 2,089 2,017 4,750 1,619 3,131 460 127 333 Air Maldives 2,089 2,017 4,750 1619 3,131 460 127 333 1988 Total 172,264 171,554 3,822,270 3,651,068 171,202 38,943 21,757 17,186 International Scheduled 101,683 101,133 3,663,225 3,497,582 165,643 38,506 21,657 16,849 Air lanka 41,480 39,934 2,068,394 1,972,638 95,756 20,203 17,677 2,526 Emirates 5,338 5,753 405,963 387,809 18,154 12 5 7 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Business Models 00 ENTWURF 0908:00 ENTWURF 01 30.09.2026 13:30 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research
    00_ENTWURF_0908:00_ENTWURF_01 30.09.2026 13:30 Uhr Seite 1 Airport Research Air Transport and Air Transport Topical Report Airline Business Models 00_ENTWURF_0908:00_ENTWURF_01 30.09.2026 13:30 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Analyses of the European air transport market Airline Business Models Release: 1.01 Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace Center für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Air Transport and Airport Research December 2008 Porz-Wahnheide Linder Höhe 51147 Köln Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Editors: Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Wolfgang Grimme, Erik Grunewald, Sven Maertens web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Topical Report: Airline Business Models 2008-12-17 Release: 1.01 Page 1 Air Transport and Analyses of the European air transport market Airport Research Airline Business Models Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Analyses of the European air transport market EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 1.01 Save date: 2008-12-17 Total pages: 41 Frontispiece: DUS Airport Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 0.06 2008-12-08 Final Draft Report 1.0 2008-12-16 Final Report 1.01 2008-12-17 layout Final Report Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Transport and Energy DG's views.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Grips with the Cost Index
    Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance issue V - October 1998 ETOPS getting to grips with getting to grips with AIRBUS AIRBUS S.A.S. 31707 BLAGNAC CEDEX - FRANCE CONCEPT DESIGN SCM12 REFERENCE SCM-A295 AUGUST 2002 ETOPS PRINTED IN FRANCE © AIRBUS S.A.S. 2002 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED issue V - October 1998 AN EADS JOINT COMPANY WITH BAE SYSTEMS Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the assumptions shown and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, the Company will be pleased to explain the basis thereof. This document is the property of Airbus and is supplied on the express condition that it is to be treated as confidential. No use of reproduction may be made thereof other than that expressely authorised. Flight Operations Support & Line Assistance Customer Services 1, rond-point Maurice Bellonte, BP 33 31707 BLAGNAC Cedex FRANCE Telephone (+33) 5 61 93 33 33 Telefax (+33) 5 61 93 29 68 Telex AIRBU 530526F SITA TLSBI7X getting to grips with ETOPS Issue V - October 1998 Note Should any deviation appear between the information provided in this brochure and that published in the applicable CMP, AFM, MMEL and FCOM, the information set forth in these documents shall prevail at all times. FOREWORD The purpose of this brochure is to provide Airbus operators with: • the currently applicable ETOPS regulations, as published in the various relevant circulars, • the agreed interpretations thereto, which have been defined in the frame of the JAA/FAA Harmonization Committee, • the latest amendments thereto, which have also been defined in the frame of the JAA/FAA Harmonization Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Economic Impact of Airports: Final Report
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Regional economic impact of airports: final report Lieshout, R.; Boonekamp, T.; Tempelman, C.; Burghouwt, G. Publication date 2015 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Lieshout, R., Boonekamp, T., Tempelman, C., & Burghouwt, G. (2015). Regional economic impact of airports: final report. (SEO-rapport; No. 2015-13). SEO. https://www.aci- europe.org/component/downloads/downloads/4462.html General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:06 Oct 2021 Regional economic impact of airports Amsterdam, 20 October 2015 Commissioned by ACI EUROPE Regional economic impact of airports Final report Rogier Lieshout Thijs Boonekamp Caren Tempelman Guillaume Burghouwt Roetersstraat 29 - 1018 WB Amsterdam - T (+31) 20 525 1630 - F (+31) 020 525 1686 - www.seo.nl - [email protected] ABN-AMRO IBAN: NL14ABNA0411744356 BIC: ABNANL2A - ING: IBAN: NL96INGB0004641100 BIC: INGBNL2A KvK Amsterdam 41197444 - BTW NL 003023965 B “The science of knowing” SEO Economic Research carries out independent applied economic research on behalf of national and international clients – both public institutions and private sector clients.
    [Show full text]