Draft Confidential RUF Apppeal Judgment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SUD BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE СУД БОСНЕ И ХЕРЦЕГОВИНЕ Case No.: S1 1K 006124 11 Kžk (Ref: X-KR-06/180-2) Date: Delivered on: 25 January 2012 Written copy issued on: 22 June 2012 Before the Panel comprised of: Judge Hilmo Vučinić, Presiding Judge Dr. Miloš Babić, member Judge Phillip Weiner, member PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA v. RADOMIR VUKOVIĆ AND ZORAN TOMIĆ VERDICT Counsel for the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Mr. Ibro Bulić Counsel for Radomir Vuković: Mr. Radivoje Lazarević Counsel for Zoran Tomić: G. Petko Pavlović 1 X-KR-07/386 16 October 2009 CONTENTS 5I. VERDICT – OPERATIVE PART ............................................................................................... 5 REASONING ..................................................................................................................................... 9 II. HISTORY OF THE CASE ........................................................................................................... 9 III. PROCEDURAL DECISIONS ................................................................................................... 10 A. DISMISSAL OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL ........................................................................................ 10 B. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC ....................................................................................................... 10 C. ADDUCED EVIDENCE AND DECISION ON MOTIONS TO ACCEPT NEW EVIDENCE ........................ 11 D. MOTION TO HEAR NEW WITNESSES ......................................................................................... 12 E. MOTION TO ACCEPT PHOTO-DOCUMENTATION ........................................................................ 13 F. MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TRANSCRIPTS OF EVIDENCE AT THE ICTY – MEVLUDIN ORIĆ ........ 14 G. DEFENSE MOTION TO REVIEW A FILM ...................................................................................... 14 H. MOTION TO RE-EXAMINE THE WITNESSES HEARD IN THE FIRST INSTANCE PROCEEDINGS ... 15 I. DEFENSE MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TRANSCRIPTS FROM THE CASE OF THE COURT OF BIH AGAINST ŽELJKO IVANOVIĆ ..................................................................................................... 16 J. MOTION TO HEAR WITNESS JEAN RENE RUEZ ......................................................................... 16 K. DECISION TO ACCEPT ESTABLISHED FACTS ............................................................................ 17 L. MOTIONS THE DEFENSE HAS WITHDRAWN ................................................................................ 20 IV. THE ORDER OF EVENTS ...................................................................................................... 20 A. STATUS OF SREBRENICA IN JULY 1995 .................................................................................... 20 B. THE ARMED CONFLICT AND THE RS SUPREME COMMAND DIRECTIVE NO. 7 OF 8 MARCH 1995 AND NO. 7.1 OF 31 MARCH 1995 AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................................. 21 C. THE VRS TAKEOVER OF SREBRENICA AND ITS AFTERMATH IN JULY 1995 ............................. 26 1. 10 July 1995 ........................................................................................................................ 28 2. 11 July 1995 ........................................................................................................................ 29 3. 12 July 1995 ........................................................................................................................ 32 4. 13 July 1995 ........................................................................................................................ 41 5. 17 to 28 July 1995 .............................................................................................................. 50 D. SUBORDINATION OF THE MUP UNITS TO VRS IN THE OPERATIONS IN SREBRENICA .............. 50 2 X-KR-07/386 16 October 2009 E. ROLE OF THE SECOND ŠEKOVIĆI DETACHMENT AND ITS DEPLOYMENT TO SREBRENICA AREA ON 12 JULY 1995 ........................................................................................................... 52 F. DEPLOYMENT OF THE 2ND ŠEKOVIĆI DETACHMENT TO THE KONJEVIĆ POLJE – BRATUNAC ROAD ON 12 JULY 1995 AND ITS TASKS ................................................................................. 61 G. SURRENDER OF BOSNIAN MUSLIMS ALONG KONJEVIĆ POLJE-BRATUNAC ROAD ................... 65 H. TREATMENT OF PRISONERS ON SANDIĆI MEADOW ................................................................... 71 I. NUMBER OF PRISONERS AND SOLDIERS/MUP OFFICERS ON SANDIĆI MEADOW ....................... 72 J. TAKING THE PRISONERS TO KRAVICA WAREHOUSE AND THE NUMBER OF PRISONERS THERE 74 K. EXECUTION OF THE PRISONERS AT KRAVICA WAREHOUSE ...................................................... 77 L. STATUS OF THE KILLED PRISONERS .......................................................................................... 85 M. REMOVAL AND BURIAL OF BODIES FROM KRAVICA WAREHOUSE ............................................. 85 N. REBURIAL OF THE BODIES OF PRISONERS FROM SREBRENICA AND KRAVICA WAREHOUSE ... 87 O. FORENSIC EVIDENCE AT THE WAREHOUSE ............................................................................... 89 V. PARTICIPATION OF THE ACCUSED, AS ALLEGED IN THE INDICTMENT ............... 92 A. PRESENCE OF RADOMIR VUKOVIĆ AND ZORAN TOMIĆ ON KONJEVIĆ POLJE – BRATUNAC ROAD ON 12 AND 13 JULY 1995 .............................................................................................. 94 B. PRESENCE OF RADOMIR VUKOVIĆ AND ZORAN TOMIĆ ON THE SANDIĆI MEADOW ................. 95 C. PRESENCE OF THE ACCUSED IN THE COLUMN OF PRISONERS AND PARTICIPATION IN THE EXECUTIONS ............................................................................................................................ 97 D. CREDIBILITY OF WITNESS D5 ................................................................................................. 105 VI. LEGAL DEFINITION - GENOCIDE ..................................................................................... 112 A. EARLIER FINDINGS ON THE GENOCIDE IN SREBRENICA ........................................................... 115 B. ELEMENTS ............................................................................................................................... 117 VII. THE PARTS OF THE INDICTMENT THAT WERE NOT ACCEPTED ......................... 135 A. JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE .................................................................................................. 136 i. A plurality of persons. They need not be organized in a military, political or administrative structure. ................................................................................................ 137 VIII. APPLICABLE LAW .............................................................................................................. 140 IX. SENTENCE .............................................................................................................................. 144 X. DECISION ON THE COSTS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND CLAIMS UNDER PROPERTY LAW ................................................................................................................... 150 3 X-KR-07/386 16 October 2009 ANNEX 1 - EVIDENCE ................................................................................................................ 151 A. PROSECUTION WITNESSES ................................................................................................... 151 A. PROSECUTION DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ........................................................................... 151 B. DEFENSE ............................................................................................................................... 156 C.2 DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ......................................................................................... 156 C.3 ZORAN TOMIĆ ........................................................................................................................ 159 ANNEX 2. A – ACCEPTED FACTS ESTABLISHED BY FINAL ICTY JUDGMENTS ..... 161 ANNEX 2. B – FACTS ESTABLISHED UNDER FINAL ICTY JUDGMENTS ................... 165 B. ANNEX 3 – TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................................................. 167 A. ICTY ...................................................................................................................................... 167 B. ICTR ...................................................................................................................................... 168 C. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ...................................................................................... 168 D. COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ................................................................................ 168 4 X-KR-07/386 16 October 2009 Number: S1 1K 006124 11 Kžk Reference to: X-KRŽ-06/180-2 Sarajevo, 25 January 2012 IN THE NAME OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA! The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), the Panel of the Appellate Division of Section I for War Crimes, consisting of Judges Hilmo Vučinić, as the President of the Panel, and Dr. Miloš Babić and Phillip Weiner, as members of the Panel, and Dženana Deljkić-Blagojević, Legal Advisor, as the record-taker, in the criminal case against the accused Radomir Vuković and Zoran Tomić, for the criminal offense of Genocide in violation of Article 171(a) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CC of BiH), and Article 31 of the CC of BiH, deciding