Rethinking Srebrenica

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rethinking Srebrenica RETHINKING SREBRENICA Stephen Karganović Ljubiša Simić RETHINKING SREBRENICA Stephen Karganović Ljubiša Simić Unwritten History, Inc. New York, New York Rethinking Srebrenica (originally published as Deconstruction of a Virtual Genocide) First published 2013. Copyright © 2013 by Stephen Karganović and Ljubiša Simić. Certain copyrighted materials have been quoted here under the Fair Use provi- sions of the U.S. Copyright Act (Section 107) which permits the use of copy- righted materials for the purposes of criticism, comment, news, reporting, and teaching. Every effort has been made by the publisher to trace the holder of the copyright for the illustration used on the front cover. As it stands now, the source re- mains unknown. This omission will be rectified in future editions. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, re- cording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher. Inquiries should be addressed to: Unwritten History, Inc. UPS Store #1052 PMB 199, Zeckendorf Towers 111 E. 14th Street New York, NY 10003 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.unwrittenhistory.com ISBN: 978-0-9709198-3-0 Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. in the United States of America CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................. vii I. SREBRENICA: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW ...................... 15 II. DEMILITARIZATION OF THE UN SAFE ZONE OF SREBRENICA ............................................................. 53 III. GENOCIDE OR BLOWBACK? ...................................... 75 IV. GENERAL PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF SREBRENICA FORENSIC DATA (PATTERN OF INJURY BREAKDOWN) ............ 108 V. AN ANALYSIS OF THE SREBRENICA FORENSIC REPORTS PREPARED BY ICTY PROSECUTION EXPERTS ......... 130 VI. AN ANALYSIS OF MUSLIM COLUMN LOSSES ATTRIBUTABLE TO MINEFIELDS, COMBAT ACTIVITY, AND OTHER CAUSES ............... 168 VII. THE GENOCIDE ISSUE: WAS THERE DEMONSTRABLE INTENT TO EXTERMINATE ALL MUSLIMS? .............. 195 VIII. ICTY RADIO INTERCEPT EVIDENCE ....................... 231 IX. THE BALANCE SHEET ............................................. 248 X. SREBRENICA: USES OF THE NARRATIVE.................. 269 INTRODUCTION It is impossible to discuss Srebrenica unless we take a holis- tic approach. The holistic approach1 prescribes that a phenome- non ought to be studied as an integral whole. An analysis must take all the components into account. The perception of the whole will be distorted and inauthentic to the extent that certain elements of the whole are stripped of the weight and significance properly due to them. The principle of holistic analysis, as the basis of an accurate perception of the way things really are, does not apply simply to pure science, medicine, anthropology, and sociology, but as well to similar branches of knowledge in the exact or social sciences. This applies just as well to the study and interpretation of historical events. Reductionism prevails whenever the obligation to take into account all factors that have played a role in a certain event has been systematically avoided. Every form of reductionism is se- lective with regard to factual data.2 We apply reductionism when we deliberately reduce complex phenomena to only a few select- ed factors that tend to corroborate the interpretation or thesis that we have formulated in advance. By doing so, we do not merely commit an egregious methodological error; we are also display- ing crude contempt for the truth. In the debate concerning the events that occurred in Srebren- ica in July 1995 — which has not subsided in the subsequent decade and a half, but in some respects has gained increasing momentum as new data are discovered — the need to reject re- 1. The general principle of holism was articulated by Aristotle as fol- lows in his Metaphysics thus: “The whole is more than the sum of its parts” (1045a10). 2. The degree of bias which characterizes the practice of the selectivity may vary from one case to another. vii RETHINKING SREBRENICA ductionism and to adopt an all-inclusive, holistic approach be- comes not only more apparent but more urgent. Only two com- peting schools of thought exist in relation to Srebrenica. The Re- ductionist School which, until recently was dominant and is now slowly but surely ceding ground, advocates compressing the en- tire event to a three-day period in July 1995. Even within such a drastically reduced time frame, this school insists on a dogmatic and one-dimensional presentation and interpretation of events. The Holistic School, on the other hand, maintains that it is im- possible to conduct a meaningful dialogue about those three days without a contextual grasp of all the events and contacts between the Serbian and Muslim communities in the region of Srebrenica during the preceding three years (1992–1995) of the conflict. The anxiety of the Reductionist camp is perceptible and, re- alistically speaking, it is entirely warranted. New facts and scien- tifically sound analyses of available data suggest alternative in- terpretations that do not at all favor their inflexible thesis. In or- der to survive, advocates of Reductionism must seek the support — to an ever increasing extent — of various political and admin- istrative structures. Examples of such palpably unacademic be- havior include demands for the adoption of political resolutions that sacralize such a dogmatic version of the events that took place in Srebrenica and impose it as the only correct one;3 persis- tent attempts to criminalize the public expression of doubt con- cerning the official account;4 and, finally, as an extraordinary 3. An example is the European Parliament Resolution of January 15, 2009, and the Declaration of the Parliament of Serbia adopted on March 31, 2010. 4. An example of this is the pending proposal to change the Criminal Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (the Muslim- Croat entity) to make “Srebrenica genocide denial” a crime, and there is the demand advanced in May 2007 by Serbian politician Nenad Čanak for the introduction of similar legislation in Serbia [Blic (Belgrade), May 28, 2007]. The latest call for repressive legis- viii INTRODUCTION sign of desperation, resorting to criminal complaints in order to silence, intimidate, and financially ruin skeptics.5 The old adage that the truth should be self-sufficient and not a ward of the coer- cive apparatus of the state in order to prevail is in this context particularly significant. The proponents of the official version of the events that took place in Srebrenica act as if they themselves are unsure of the verisimilitude of such “truth” and its ultimate vindication by the exclusive use of the standard methods of intel- lectual discourse. The central issue that we analyze in this study concerns the casualties suffered by the Muslim side in July 1995 as a result of the attack by the Army of the Republic of Srpska (Vojska Re- publike Srpske or “VRS“) on the enclave of Srebrenica. This issue is important in several respects because first and foremost these casualties, by being conflated with the execution victims, are framed in terms of the guilt of the Serbian side, which even goes so far as to impute collective guilt. Assuming, arguendo, that some form of guilt were properly attributable to these casu- alties, it is necessary to establish their nature and scope so that the degree of applicable guilt may be fairly assessed. Further, these conflated casualties-plus-execution-victims in the case of Srebrenica have not been treated as a standard war crime but have been raised to the level of genocide — the most heinous crime known in international law. This provides additional impe- tus to clarify with the greatest possible accuracy the dimensions lation on this subject was made by Serbian Helsinki Committee President Sonja Biserko on July 10, 2012 (http://www.helsinki.org.rs/tjsrebrenica_t10.html). 5. An illustration of this tactic is the recent lawsuit filed against the Swiss newspaper La Nation for expressing what were, in fact, some very mild and moderate doubts. See: Balkan Insight, April 19, 2010, “Complaint Filed for Srebrenica Genocide Denial”, http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/27445/. ix RETHINKING SREBRENICA of that event in terms of actual human losses as well as their proper legal classification. Finally, the truth must not only be welcomed but it must also be actively sought, and when found, it must be given unhindered opportunity to affect thinking and to work its healing power in human relations. That is why it is essential to establish the truth about Srebrenica. If the official version is incorrect with respect to key material aspects, its successful perpetuation and imposi- tion will result in the most negative consequences. It will further poison the relations of and mutually alienate the Orthodox and Muslim communities in Srebrenica, who have no other choice — if they care for a better future — than to live in peace and har- mony, assuming, of course, that they do not wish to see the hor- rors of the recent war repeated. The Holistic approach prescribes, above all, a careful and unprejudiced analysis of the available data. In question is the extent and classification of Muslim casualties that were the di- rect result of the takeover of the Srebrenica enclave by the Army of the Republika Srpska in July 1995.6 The principal task of this study is clarification.
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
    [Show full text]
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999
    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER (Exclusively for the Use of the Media
    JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) United Nations The Hague, 30 June 2006 Nations Unies PROSECUTOR V. NASER ORIĆ SUMMARY OF JUDGEMENT International Please find below the summary of the judgement today read out by Judge Agius: Criminal Tribunal for the former Introduction Yugoslavia Tribunal Pénal Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia is sitting today to International pour deliver its Judgement in the trial of Naser Orić. l’ex-Yougoslavie This case deals with crimes of murder and cruel treatment of prisoners and of wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages alleged to have happened in Srebrenica in 1992 and 1993 for which the Accused was indicted on 13 March 2003. The Accused stood trial for the following charges: first, under COUNT 1, he is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute of the Tribunal (“Statute”) for murder as a violation of the laws or customs of war pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute. Under COUNT 2, the Accused is charged with individual criminal responsibility under Article 7(3) of the Statute for cruel treatment as a violation of the laws or customs of war pursuant to Article 3 of the Statute. The Prosecution never alleged that these crimes of murder and cruel treatment were committed by the Accused, but only accused him pursuant to Article 7(3) of the Statute as being responsible for these crimes committed by his subordinates whilst he was holding a position of superior authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 8 November 2002
    United Nations S/2002/1226 Security Council Distr.: General 8 November 2002 Original: English Letter dated 7 November 2002 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council I have the honour to convey the communication dated 5 November 2002 which I received from the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (see annex). I should be grateful if you would bring it to the attention of the members of the Security Council. (Signed) Kofi A. Annan 02-68453 (E) 111102 *0268453* S/2002/1226 Annex Letter dated 5 November 2002 from the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to the Secretary-General In accordance with Security Council resolution 1088 (1996), I attach the September monthly report on SFOR operations (see enclosure). I would appreciate your making this report available to the Security Council. (Signed) George Robertson 2 S/2002/1226 Enclosure Monthly report to the United Nations on the operations of the Stabilization Force 1. Over the reporting period (1-30 September 2002) there were almost 14,900 troops deployed in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia, with contributions from the NATO allies and from 15 non-NATO countries. 2. During the period under review, the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina remained stable, although there is general concern about increased ethnic tension in Sanski Most (west of Banja Luka) because of the growing number of Bosnian Serbs returning there, and in particular owing to the recent dedication by Bosnian Serbs of a controversial war memorial in the town, which is now inhabited for the most part by Bosniacs.
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIE G R I E (Plus De 1 100 000 Hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ V
    vers BUDAPEST 20° vers BÉKÉSCSABA vers BUDAPEST vers ORADEA 22° 21° vers BUCAREST Capitale d'État SERBIE G R I E (plus de 1 100 000 hab.) O N SZEGED H MAKÓ v. BUDAPEST 19° NADLAC ARAD Plus de 200 000 hab. E PÉCS B Plus de 100 000 hab. ) SÂNNICOLAU MARE Mures U A N Kanjiza A N 46° D U Subotica Novi R LIPOVA Plus de 50 000 hab. D vers CRAIOVA ( nca Knezevac ra A 46° MOHÁCS BAČKA DU NORD K B A N A T r Coka O Plus de 25 000 hab. i B A Č K A v a a ic j Senta t a a D E L ’ O U E S T l D U N O R D Z Plus de 10 000 hab. Bačka Topola Kikinda U BELI MANASTIR Ada (SEVERNI JIMBOLIA vers VARAZDIN Sombor (SEVERNA BAČKA) Autre ville ou localité I I BANAT) I a DRA I g V I Mali Idos TIMISOARA e M E I B I V I e Crvenka ( li I k Nova D i I VOÏVODINE I Pirot Chef-lieu d'okrug (district) R k I Crnja A I a (province autonome) Apatin n Kula s I LUGOS V a I i j A I l I m ) M e i (Z A P A D N A I Becej Novi Becej l T OSIJEK I I I g a I a I I e n A Autoroute a l I I I B k i CRAIOVA B A Č K A) I I I i I I I I Vrbas I I I r I i T ta k k I S s a I I j vers I e n S g Srbobran B A I N A T a A e Route principale I CRUCENI l B Odzaci I BAČKAI DU SUD C R O A T I E GATAIA I Bîrza v a Zitiste N I s i V I u D Temerin ka Backi A Bac m Route secondaire N I C E N T R A L a DETA ( I D Petrovac U I T U B I I N Zabali Boka E I I Secanj VINKOVCI A I I I V Zrenjanin Autre route VUKOVAR I ) Novi Sad I I (SREDNJI BANAT) I I vers ZAGREB I I I I JAMU (JUŽNI BAČKA) I Backa Palanka Plandiste Futog K I MARE Titel a I Voie ferrée n I B a l I o sut Beocin D I u E I 641 vers CRAIOVA n D a
    [Show full text]
  • Zakon O Nacionalnom Parku „Drina“
    ZAKON O NACIONALNOM PARKU „DRINA“ Član 1. Ovim zakonom uređuju se granice, zone i režimi zaštite, pitanja upravljanja, zaštite i razvoja Nacionalnog parka „Drina“ (u daljem tekstu: Nacionalni park). Član 2. Nacionalni park je područje izuzetnih prirodnih vrijednosti, koje čini klisurasto- kanjonska dolina rijeke Drine kao jedna od najznačajnijih riječnih dolina Republike Srpske, sa brojnim staništima endemičnih i reliktnih biljnih vrsta, te izuzetnim diverzitetom flore i faune, koje je namijenjeno očuvanju postojećih prirodnih vrijednosti i resursa, ukupne pejzažne, geološke i biološke raznovrsnosti, kao i zadovoljenju naučnih, obrazovnih, duhovnih, estetskih, kulturnih, turističkih, zdravstveno-rekreativnih potreba i ostalih aktivnosti u skladu sa načelima zaštite prirode i održivog razvoja. Član 3. Na pitanja od značaja za zaštitu, razvoj, unapređivanje, upravljanje, finansiranje, kaznene odredbe i održivo korišćenje Nacionalnog parka koja nisu uređena ovim zakonom primjenjuju se posebni propisi kojim se uređuju pitanja nacionalnih parkova, zaštite prirode i drugi zakoni i podzakonski akti kojima se reguliše ova oblast. Član 4. (1) Nacionalni park prostire se na području opštine Srebrenica u ukupnoj površini od 6.315,32 hektara. (2) Opis spoljne granice Nacionalnog parka: Početna tačka opisa granice obuhvata Nacionalnog parka je u tromeđi opština Srebrenica, Višegrad i Rogatica (tačka A). Granica ide ka sjeveroistoku do tromeđe opština Srebrenica, Višegrad i Bajine Bašte u Srbiji (tačka B). Od tačke A do tačke B, granica ide jezerom Perućac, odnosno granicom između opština Srebrenica i Višegrad. Od tromeđe opština Srebrenica, Višegrad i Bajine Bašte u Srbiji (tačka B), granica ide do krune brane Perućac (tačka V). Od tačke B do tačke V, granica ide jezerom Perućac, odnosno granicom između Bosne i Hercegovine i Srbije.
    [Show full text]
  • Tara-Drina National Park
    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Sectarian Divide Continues to Hamper Residual Return and Reintegration of the Displaced
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: Sectarian divide continues to hamper residual return and reintegration of the displaced A profile of the internal displacement situation 25 October, 2006 This Internal Displacement Profile is automatically generated from the online IDP database of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). It includes an overview of the internal displacement situation in the country prepared by the IDMC, followed by a compilation of excerpts from relevant reports by a variety of different sources. All headlines as well as the bullet point summaries at the beginning of each chapter were added by the IDMC to facilitate navigation through the Profile. Where dates in brackets are added to headlines, they indicate the publication date of the most recent source used in the respective chapter. The views expressed in the reports compiled in this Profile are not necessarily shared by the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. The Profile is also available online at www.internal-displacement.org. About the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, established in 1998 by the Norwegian Refugee Council, is the leading international body monitoring conflict-induced internal displacement worldwide. Through its work, the Centre contributes to improving national and international capacities to protect and assist the millions of people around the globe who have been displaced within their own country as a result of conflicts or human rights violations. At the request of the United Nations, the Geneva-based Centre runs an online database providing comprehensive information and analysis on internal displacement in some 50 countries. Based on its monitoring and data collection activities, the Centre advocates for durable solutions to the plight of the internally displaced in line with international standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Logistic Concepts for Wood Biomass Supply Chains for District Heating Plants in Municipalities of Priboj, Novi Pazar, Bajina Bašta and Nova Varoš
    Design of logistic concepts for wood biomass supply chains for district heating plants in municipalities of Priboj, Novi Pazar, Bajina Bašta and Nova Varoš prepared for: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH DKTI- Development of a Sustainable Bioenergy Market in Serbia Bože Jankovića 39 11000 Beograd Prepared by: Damir Đaković, PhD Branka Gvozdenac Urošević, PhD Dragan Urošević, PhD January 2015 DKTI (GIZ) Programme "Development of sustainable bioenergy market in Serbia" Design of logistic concepts for wood biomass supply chains for district heating plants in municipalities of Priboj, Novi Pazar, Bajina Bašta and Nova Varoš TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 9 2. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY ............................................................................................... 10 2.1 SERBIAN LAW REGARDING THE USE OF BIOMASS ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA May, 2014 BASIC INFORMATION Project Title Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP BiH) and Development of the Fifth National Report to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) Project Acronym NBSAP BiH Project Duration Period January 2013 – December 2014 GEF Implementation United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP Agency GEF Operational Focal Point Senad Oprašić, PhD, Head of the Environmental Protection for Bosnia and Herzegovina Department at the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina (MoFTER BiH) UNCBD Focal Point for BiH Mehmed Cero, M. Sc., Assistant Minister in the Environment Sector of the FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MoET FBiH) 2 Client: FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism Supported by: United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP External Associate Experts: Senka Barudanović Stjepan Matić Radoslav Dekić Dragojla Golub Consultant: Centre for Energy, Environment and Resources (CENER 21) Translation and Proofreading: Gordana Lonco Edina Dmitrović Graphic Design: Tarik Hodžić 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank the following institutions for the support that they provided in the development of the Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) and through their participation in workshops, provision of data, information, comments and suggestions: Aarhus Centre
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKE SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA Član 4
    SLUŽBENI GLASNIK OPŠTINE SREBRENICA BROJ: 2/2019 Srebrenica, 15.10.2019. god. SKUPŠTINA OPŠTINE SREBRENICA ODLUKE, ZAKLJUČCI, PROGRAMI I JAVNI KONKURSI AKTI NAČELNIKA OPŠTINE SREBRENICA ODLUKE SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE SREBRENICA Član 4. Broj: 01-022-122/19 Ova odluka ne predstavlja osnov za promjenu Srebrenica, 02.04.2019. god. imovinsko pravnih odnosa u pogledu predmetnih prostorija koje se daju na korištenje, ašto će biti U skladu sa članom 39. Zakona o lokalnoj samoupravi definisano i samim ugovorom. ("Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske", broj: 97/16), člana 34. Statuta opštine Srebrenica ("Službeni glasnik opštine Srebrenica", broj: 2/18), a na prijedlog Član 5. Načelnika opštine, Skupština opštine Srebrenica na XVII redovnoj sjednici održanoj dana 24.04.2019. Ova Odluka stupa na snagu danom donošenja i ista će godine donosi: se objaviti u "Službenom glasniku opštine Srebrenica". ODLUKU Obrazloženje o davanju kancelarijskog prostora 38m² - II sprat ranije robne kuće u "Srebreničanka" na korištenje Skupština opštine Srebrenica dodjeljuje predmetnu MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica prostoriju MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica na korištenje da bi se obezbjedio nesmetan i funkcionalan rad Član 1. Društva. Ovom odlukom daje se na korištenje poslovna DOSTAVLJENO: prostorija (38 m²) smještena na II spratu nekadašnje 1. Načelniku opštine; robne kuće Srebreničanka (Trg Mihajla Bjelakovića bb) 2. Stručnoj službi SO; Muslimanskom dobortvornom društvu "Merhamet" 3. MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica; Srebrenica. 4. a/a. Član 2. PREDSJEDNIK SKUPŠTINE OPŠTINE Nedib Smajić, s.r. MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica će navedeni prostor koristiti bez nadoknade na vremenski period od 10 godina (sa mogućnostima raskida, odnosno produženja vremenskog trajanja ugovora). Predmetni prostor se nalazi u dosta zapuštenom stanju te MDD "Merhamet" Srebrenica na sebe preuzima obavezu adaptacije istog.
    [Show full text]
  • Konačna Rang Lista Potencijalnih Korisnika Opština Bosansko Grahovo
    JAVNI POZIV 2019. FMROI - KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA OPŠTINA BOSANSKO GRAHOVO Adresa sanacije Broj Rbr Prezime i ime Sadašnja adresa bodova Marinković (Radoslav) G. Principa bb, B. Grahovo 1. 220 Zvezdan G. Principa bb, B. Grahovo H. Abdičevića 19, B.Grahovo 2. Galić (Mile) Marko 190 H. Abdičevića 19, B.Grahovo Kesići bb, B. Grahovo 3. Damjanović (Ilija) Milica 180 Kesići bb, B. Grahovo Novo Naselje bb, B. Grahovo 4. Pavlović (Rade) Slavojka 170 Novo Naselje bb, B. Grahovo Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo 5. Prijić (Milenko) Slobodan 170 Pečenci bb, B. grahovo Resanovci bb, B. Grahovo 6. Lukač (Željko) Gojko 160 Resanovci bb, B. Grahovo Kesići bb, B. Grahovo 7. Damjanović (Mile) Želemir 160 Kesići bb, B. Grahovo Jaruga bb, B. Grahovo 8. Ivetić (Vaso) Brigite 160 Živojina Ćuluma 26, Zemun Dalmatinska bb, B. Grahovo 9. Kovačević (Dušan) Dragiša 150 Novo Naselje bb, B. Grahovo Braće Bajić 6, B. Grahovo 10. Maljković (Stevan) Ilija Braće Bajić 6, B. Grahovo 150 Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo 11. Arežina (Dušan) Jovo 150 Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo Ugarci bb, B. Grahovo 12. Lošić (Marko) Aleksandar 150 Ugarci bb, B. Grahovo JAVNI POZIV 2019. FMROI - KONAČNA RANG LISTA POTENCIJALNIH KORISNIKA OPŠTINA BOSANSKO GRAHOVO Livanjski put bb, B. Grahovo 13. Bašić (Uroš) Višnjica 150 Ugarci bb, B. Grahovo Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo 14. Momić (Todor) Milan 150 Pečenci bb, B. Grahovo Donji Tiškovac bb, B. Grahovo 15. Borovnica (Mile) Dragan 150 Donji Tiškovac bb, B. Grahovo Kninski Put bb, B. Grahovo 16. Reljić (Stevan) Mara 150 Kninski Put bb, B. Grahovo Tičevo bb, B. Grahovo 17.
    [Show full text]