Sectarian Divide Continues to Hamper Residual Return and Reintegration of the Displaced

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sectarian Divide Continues to Hamper Residual Return and Reintegration of the Displaced BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: Sectarian divide continues to hamper residual return and reintegration of the displaced A profile of the internal displacement situation 25 October, 2006 This Internal Displacement Profile is automatically generated from the online IDP database of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). It includes an overview of the internal displacement situation in the country prepared by the IDMC, followed by a compilation of excerpts from relevant reports by a variety of different sources. All headlines as well as the bullet point summaries at the beginning of each chapter were added by the IDMC to facilitate navigation through the Profile. Where dates in brackets are added to headlines, they indicate the publication date of the most recent source used in the respective chapter. The views expressed in the reports compiled in this Profile are not necessarily shared by the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. The Profile is also available online at www.internal-displacement.org. About the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, established in 1998 by the Norwegian Refugee Council, is the leading international body monitoring conflict-induced internal displacement worldwide. Through its work, the Centre contributes to improving national and international capacities to protect and assist the millions of people around the globe who have been displaced within their own country as a result of conflicts or human rights violations. At the request of the United Nations, the Geneva-based Centre runs an online database providing comprehensive information and analysis on internal displacement in some 50 countries. Based on its monitoring and data collection activities, the Centre advocates for durable solutions to the plight of the internally displaced in line with international standards. The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre also carries out training activities to enhance the capacity of local actors to respond to the needs of internally displaced people. In its work, the Centre cooperates with and provides support to local and national civil society initiatives. For more information, visit the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre website and the database at www.internal-displacement.org. Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre Norwegian Refugee Council Chemin de Balexert 7-9 1219 Geneva, Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 799 07 00 [email protected] www.internal-displacement.org 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS 3 OVERVIEW 9 SECTARIAN DIVIDE CONTINUES TO HAMPER RESIDUAL RETURN AND REINTEGRATION OF THE DISPLACED 9 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND 16 CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 16 DISPLACEMENT DURING THE ARMED CONFLICT (1992-1995) 16 ETHNIC CLEANSING CONFRONTS HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO SERIOUS DILEMMA 17 MORE POPULATION DISPLACEMENT IN 1996 19 BACKGROUND 21 THE DAYTON AGREEMENT CONSOLIDATES THE CEASE-FIRE, SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER 1995 21 NATIONALIST OBSTRUCTION LEAD SUCCESSIVE HIGH REPRESENTATIVES TO MAKE STRONG INTERVENTIONS ON THE POLITICAL SCENE, 1999-2002 22 HIGH REPRESENTATIVE'S PLAN TO STRENGTHEN BIH’S SECURITY INSTITUTIONS AND ADDRESS RS’S LACK OF COOPERATION WITH THE ICTY CREATES A POLITICAL CRISIS IN THE RS (2004) 24 NEW HIGH REPRESENTATIVE ANNOUNCES LIMITED USE OF THE BONN POWERS TO HAND FULL RESPONSIBILITY TO BOSNIANS (2006) 26 BEYOND DAYTON: REINFORCE STATE-LEVEL INSTITUTIONS TO GO BEYOND THE ETHNICALLY BASED ENTITIES CREATED BY THE AGREEMENT, 2002-2004 27 PROGRESS ON REINFORCEMENT OF STATE LEVEL INSTITUTIONS HALTED BY REJECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM (2006) 30 REGIONAL CONTEXT MORE FAVOURABLE TO DURABLE SOLUTIONS (2000-2003) 33 MINISTERS OF REFUGEE AND DPS IN BOSNIA, CROATIA AND SERBIA-MONTENEGRO COMMIT THEMSELVES TO CLOSE THE DISPLACEMENT CHAPTER IN THEIR REGION BY END OF 2006 (2006) 35 PROGRESS TOWARDS EU INTEGRATION REQUIRES A SELF-FUNCTIONING STATE (2006) 37 POPULATION FIGURES AND PROFILE 39 GLOBAL FIGURES 39 AFTER SIGNIFICANT DROP DOWN IN 2005 DUE TO RE-REGISTRATION, NUMBER OF DISPLACED PERSONS SLOWLY DECREASED TO 180,250 (2006) 39 INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT SINCE DAYTON (1995-2005) 40 NATIONAL AUTHORITIES ESTIMATE LOWER IDP FIGURES (AS OF OCTOBER 2003) 43 AT LEAST 200,000 PERSONS HAVE BECOME INTERNALLY DISPLACED SINCE THE DAYTON AGREEMENT (1995-1999) 45 3 DISAGGREGATED DATA 45 STATISTICAL PROFILE OF DISPLACED PERSON POPULATION (2006) 45 PATTERNS OF DISPLACEMENT 47 GENERAL 47 INCREASED DEPORTATIONS OF BIH CITIZENS LEAD TO FURTHER INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT (2005) 47 REMAINING IDPS AND CURRENT RETURNEES ARE AMONG THE MOST VULNERABLE (2005) 48 DISPLACED ROMA, A PARTICULARLY VULNERABLE GROUP (2005) 49 INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT FOLLOWS A RURAL-URBAN MIGRATION PATTERN (1998) 50 PHYSICAL SECURITY & FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT 51 PHYSICAL SECURITY 51 SECURITY SITUATION HAS CONSTANTLY IMPROVED IN THE PAST YEARS BUT RELUCTANCE TO PUNISH ETHNICALLY MOTIVATED VIOLENCE INCREASES THE FEELING OF INSECURITY (2006) 51 LANDMINES CONTINUE TO POSE BARRIER TO SAFE RETURN OF DISPLACED PERSONS AND REFUGEES (2006) 53 POLICE AND JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS CONTRIBUTE TO IMPUNITY IN CERTAIN AREAS BUT REFORM IS ONGOING (2006) 55 ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL WAR CRIME CHAMBER IN A CONTEXT OF WIDESPREAD IMPUNITY FOR WAR CRIMES (2005) 59 REPUBLIKA SRPSKA RECOGNIZES ITS RESPONSIBILITY IN THE SREBRENICA MASSACRE (2006) 61 DETERMINATION OF INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AGAINST RS LACK OF COOPERATION WITH ICTY LEADS TO FIRST TRANSFERS TO THE TRIBUNAL (2005) 63 FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT 66 IMPROVING FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT DESPITE CONTINUED INFLUENCE OF ETHNIC SEPARATISTS (2002-2003) 66 INTER-ENTITY BUS TRAFFIC SUPPORTED BY UNHCR HAS CONTRIBUTED TO IMPROVED FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT OF MINORITY MEMBERS BETWEEN THE ENTITIES (1996-2002) 68 VULNERABLE GROUPS 70 ENSURING WITNESS PROTECTION TO ADDRESS WAR CRIMES (2005) 70 IMPUNITY FOR WAR CRIMES AND LACK OF EFFICIENT WITNESS PROTECTION HINDERS MINORITY RETURN: (2005) 72 NEW IMPETUS TO PROSECUTE WAR CRIMES TRIAL IN REPUBLIKA SRPSKA BUT COOPERATION WITH THE ICTY REMAINS INADEQUATE (2006) 75 REINTEGRATION OF VULNERABLE GROUPS CAN PROVE VERY DIFFICULT (2000-2003) 76 SUBSISTENCE NEEDS 78 GENERAL 78 THE FAILURE TO REFORM OF THE SOCIAL WELFARE SYSTEM LEAVES THE MOST VULNERABLE IDPS UNASSISTED (2006) 78 PERSISTING PROBLEMS OF ACCESS TO UTILITIES FOR RETURNEES AND OTHER VULNERABLE PERSONS (2006) 79 SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS 83 4 AT LEAST 7,000 INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS STILL LIVE IN COLLECTIVE CENTRES (1995- 2006) 83 IDPS IN COLLECTIVE CENTRES LIVE ARE AMONG THE MOST VULNERABLE AND LIVE IN APPALLING CONDITIONS (2006) 86 SIGNIFICANT RECONSTRUCTION NEEDS REMAIN UNADDRESSED (2005) 87 ABSENCE OF A STATE LEVEL HOUSING LAW TO ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THE MOST VULNERABLE (2005) 89 ROMA LIVING IN INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS LIVE IN SUB-STANDARDS HOUSING CONDITIONS AND ARE VULNERABLE TO EVICTIONS (2005) 89 HR DECISION EXTENDS USE OF COLLECTIVE AND TRANSIT CENTRES AS ALTERNATIVE AND EMERGENCY ACCOMMODATION FOR SIX MONTHS (2003) 90 HOUSING SHORTAGES AFFECT DISPLACED PERSONS WHO ARE BEING EVICTED AS A RESULT OF THE PROPERTY RESTITUTION PROCESS (2000-2003) 91 GENERAL 93 HEALTH 93 HEALTH STATUTE OF IDPS IS POORER THAN DOMICILE POPULATION (2006) 93 HEALTH CARE SYSTEM DOES NOT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF RETURNEES AND INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSONS (2006) 94 MANY IDPS SUFFERING FROM LONG-TERM POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER DO NOT RECEIVE ADEQUATE ASSISTANCE (2006) 98 VULNERABLE GROUPS 98 VULNERABLE IDPS LIVE IN DEPLORABLE CONDITIONS (2006) 98 DISPLACEMENT AGGRAVATES THE LIVING CONDITIONS OF ROMAS (2005) 99 LACK OF ADEQUATE PROGRAMMES TO SUPPORT VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE (2006) 101 FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS LESS LIKELY TO OBTAIN SECURE HOUSING OR HEALTH CARE (2002-2003) 102 MEMBERS OF ROMA COMMUNITY CONTINUE TO FACE DISCRIMINATION UPON RETURN (2002 – 2003) 102 ACCESS TO EDUCATION 105 GENERAL 105 IMPACT OF DISPLACEMENT ON EDUCATION (2006) 105 CURRENT EDUCATION SYSTEM FAILS TO PLAY A RECONCILIATORY ROLE (2006) 106 PERSISTENT DISCRIMINATION AND SEGREGATION IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM HAMPER RETURN OF DISPLACED PERSONS AND REFUGEES (2005) 107 EDUCATION REFORM ATTEMPTS TO ADDRESS DISCRIMINATION AT SCHOOL (2004) 109 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EDUCATION REFORM: PROGRESS UNDER INTERNATIONAL PRESSURE (2006) 112 IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERIM AGREEMENT ADDRESSING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST RETURNEE CHILDREN (2005) 114 TWO SCHOOLS UNDER ONE ROOF: SEGREGATED EDUCATION PERSISTS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (2006) 117 CHILDREN ARE BEING TAUGHT DIFFERENT CURRICULA DEPENDING ON THEIR ETHNICITY (2006) 121 EFFORTS TO FACILITATE THE INTEGRATION OF ROMA CHILDREN AT SCHOOLS (2005) 124 OBSTACLES TO EDUCATION 127 ISSUES OF SELF-RELIANCE AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 128 5 SELF-RELIANCE 128 DISPLACED PERSONS AND REFUGEES AMONG FOUR POPULATION GROUPS AT GREATEST RISK OF FALLING INTO POVERTY (2006) 128 OVERSTRETCHED SOCIAL WELFARE SYSTEM AND WIDE SPREAD VIOLATION OF SOCIAL RIGHTS (2002-2003) 130 LACK OF HARMONISED LEGISLATION AT STATE LEVEL ON SOCIAL ENTITLEMENTS LIMITS FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT (2006) 132 INTER-ENTITY RETURN STILL HAMPERED BY DIVIDED PENSION SYSTEM (2006) 133 IMPACT OF DISPLACEMENT ON ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT (2006) 136 SUSTAINABLE RETURN CONTINUES TO BE HINDERED BY HIGH RATES OF UNEMPLOYMENT AMONGST DISPLACED AND RETURNEES (2005) 137 AUTHORITIES HAVE FAILED TO ADDRESS VIOLATIONS OF WORKERS’ RIGHT WHO ARBITRARILY DISMISSED DURING THE WAR (2006) 140 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 141 CURRENT CONSTITUTION AND LEGISLATION LIMITS THE RIGHT OF PARTICIPATION OF MINORITY RETURNEES (2006) 141 RETURNEES ARE NOT ADEQUATELY REPRESENTED IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS (2005) 145 ELECTION LAW PROVIDES FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE
Recommended publications
  • Response of the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to The
    CPT/Inf (2012) 16 Response of the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina from 5 to 14 April 2011 The Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina has requested the publication of this response. The report of the CPT on its April 2011 visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina is set out in document CPT/Inf (2012) 15. Strasbourg, 26 April 2012 - 3 - CONTENTS Ministry of Justice - Pre-trial Detention Unit in the State-level Prison of Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................................................6 Ministry of Security (Service for Aliens' Affairs)............................................................................7 District Prosecutor’s Office of the Republika Srpska - Special Prosecutor’s Office of Banja Luka .....................................................................................................................................9 Istočno Sarajevo District Prosecutor’s Office................................................................................12 Ministry of Justice of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina...............................................13 Ministry of the Interior of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.......................................16 Ministry of Labour and Social Policy of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina................18 Ministry of Justice of Republika Srspka
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Worlds Apart: Bosnian Lessons for Global Security
    Worlds Apart Swanee Hunt Worlds Apart Bosnian Lessons for GLoBaL security Duke university Press Durham anD LonDon 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. To my partners c harLes ansBacher: “Of course you can.” and VaLerie GiLLen: “Of course we can.” and Mirsad JaceVic: “Of course you must.” Contents Author’s Note xi Map of Yugoslavia xii Prologue xiii Acknowledgments xix Context xxi Part i: War Section 1: Officialdom 3 1. insiDe: “Esteemed Mr. Carrington” 3 2. outsiDe: A Convenient Euphemism 4 3. insiDe: Angels and Animals 8 4. outsiDe: Carter and Conscience 10 5. insiDe: “If I Left, Everyone Would Flee” 12 6. outsiDe: None of Our Business 15 7. insiDe: Silajdžić 17 8. outsiDe: Unintended Consequences 18 9. insiDe: The Bread Factory 19 10. outsiDe: Elegant Tables 21 Section 2: Victims or Agents? 24 11. insiDe: The Unspeakable 24 12. outsiDe: The Politics of Rape 26 13. insiDe: An Unlikely Soldier 28 14. outsiDe: Happy Fourth of July 30 15. insiDe: Women on the Side 33 16. outsiDe: Contact Sport 35 Section 3: Deadly Stereotypes 37 17. insiDe: An Artificial War 37 18. outsiDe: Clashes 38 19. insiDe: Crossing the Fault Line 39 20. outsiDe: “The Truth about Goražde” 41 21. insiDe: Loyal 43 22. outsiDe: Pentagon Sympathies 46 23. insiDe: Family Friends 48 24. outsiDe: Extremists 50 Section 4: Fissures and Connections 55 25.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixth Periodic Report Submitted by Bosnia and Herzegovina Under Article 18 of the Convention, Due in 2017*
    CEDAW/C/BIH/6 Distr.: General 19 April 2018 Original: English ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Sixth periodic report submitted by Bosnia and Herzegovina under article 18 of the Convention, due in 2017* [Date received: 19 April 2018] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. Note: The present document is being circulated in English, French and Spanish only. CEDAW/C/BIH/6 Contents Page List of abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Part I ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Article 1: Discrimination against women ................................................................................ 5 Articles 2 & 3: Measures to eliminate discrimination against women ..................................... 5 Article 4: Promoting equal rights between women and men ................................................... 14 Article 5: Elimination of stereotypes and prejudice ................................................................. 16 Article 6: Combating trafficking in women and exploiting women for prostitution................ 20 Part II ......................................................................................................................................... 21 Article 7: Political and public life ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    23671 <: *h :? ' November 2001 J SIAED6JMEN PRI ES lNfE OATOF B SNI HER EGOVINA Public Disclosure Authorized INA ANT/ ~* EN4/\ AVB4 /\ TNCIA/ ANTON\/A NT ** T RZNgATN / NT \IAN - 4*N EVANTO Public Disclosure Authorized /.SA E NTON H G N A I \ / \_ *: NtRETVA\ tANTOs/ \ / \ / L / C_l /\\ / \ / \ / 29 K I~E *>tE'\STC+NTzONHx,ERZG/VINA X / \ : I L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Public Disclosure Authorized / CzNTOSRvJEV F/I\/E COPY Public Disclosure Authorized CANTONS IN THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA UNA - SANA CANTON No. 1 POSAVINA CANTON No. 2 TUZLA CANTON No. 3 ZENICA - DOBOJ CANTON No. 4 DRINA CANTON No. 5 CENTRAL BOSNIAN CANTON No. 6 NERETVA CANTON No. 7 WEST HERZEGOVINA CANTON No. 8 SARAJEVO CANTON No. 9 HERZEG BOSNIAN CANTON No.10 Authors: Miralem Porobic, lawyer and Senada Havic Design: Tirada, Sarajevo. Chris Miller Free publication November 2001 SEED. Sarajevo. Bosnia and Herzegovina This study was done with an aim to determine the level of the actual costs, which must have each small and medium business company when start their operations in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It contains the defined costs for the business registration itself, and for construction of a facility where the registered activity will be performed. The data published in this study were collected through the survey conducted in all municipalities in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in July 2001. After summarizing all collected data, it was determined that there are few identical forms and approaches to the same category of the costs that a small and medium size business company can have as a precondition for starting its normal work.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA NATIONAL REPORT ON HIGHER EDUCATION: 2005 – 2007 A. Background information on your Higher Education system Details Country Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) Date December 15, 2006 BFUG member (one name only) Zenan Sabanac Position Bologna Follow Up Group Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina Email address [email protected] Contributors to the report1 Ministry of Civil Affairs of BiH, competent ministries of education in the entities and cantons in BiH, all public universities in BiH, Higher Education Working Group/Bologna Committee for BiH, Team of Bologna Promoters, NGO Amica EDUCA Main achievements since Bergen 1. Describe the important developments relating to the Bologna Process, including legislative reforms, since Bergen. Over the past two years in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), some significant shifts have been recorded in the implementation of the Bologna Process. The biggest credit for this goes primarily to the public universities in BiH and the international community (first of all the Council of Europe, the European Commission in BiH and the Austrian Development Agency). As of this year, at all public universities in BiH, the implementation of the first cycle has started in compliance with the Bologna principles. The curricula have been reformed and adjusted to the two-cycle system of study; two models have been most often used: 3+2 and 4+1, depending on the university or the study group. Some faculties and universities had started the implementation of the first cycle as early as in the 2003/04 academic year, and next year we will be expecting the first generation of students bearing the title of Bachelor of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • The Continuing Challenge of Refugee Return in Bosnia & Herzegovina
    THE CONTINUING CHALLENGE OF REFUGEE RETURN IN BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA 13 December 2002 Balkans Report N°137 Sarajevo/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 II. RETURN AND DISPLACEMENT IN 2002...................................................................4 III. NATIONALIST STEREOTYPES AND THE POLITICAL IMPACT OF RETURN...............................................................................................................................5 IV. CREATING SPACE FOR RETURN OR RELOCATION?........................................7 A. RECONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE........................................................................................ 7 B. PROPERTY REPOSSESSION ................................................................................................ 9 C. RETURNING TO SELL? .....................................................................................................11 D. ILLEGAL LAND ALLOCATION TO REFUGEES: DEMOGRAPHIC ENGINEERING CONTINUES .....11 V. REASONS NOT TO RETURN.......................................................................................14 A. DISCRIMINATION IN A DEPRESSED ECONOMY...................................................................14 B. MONO-ETHNIC INSTITUTIONS..........................................................................................16 C. SECURITY.......................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • European Social Charter the Government of Bosnia And
    16/06/2021 RAP/RCha/BIH/11 (2021) EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER 11th National Report on the implementation of the European Social Charter submitted by THE GOVERNMENT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Articles 11, 12, 13, 14 and 23 of the European Social Charter for the period 01/01/2016 – 31/12/2019 Report registered by the Secretariat on 16 June 2021 CYCLE 2021 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND REFUGEES THE ELEVENTH REPORT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER /REVISED/ GROUP I: HEALTH, SOCIAL SECURITY AND SOCIAL PROTECTION ARTICLES 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 23 REFERENCE PERIOD: JANUARY 2016 - DECEMBER 2019 SARAJEVO, SEPTEMBER 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 3 II. ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ........... 4 III. GENERAL LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................... 5 1. Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................................... 5 2. Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................... 5 3. Republika Srpska ........................................................................................................... 9 4. Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina .............................................................. 10 IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF RATIFIED ESC/R/ PROVISIONS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Distr.: General 8 November 2002
    United Nations S/2002/1226 Security Council Distr.: General 8 November 2002 Original: English Letter dated 7 November 2002 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council I have the honour to convey the communication dated 5 November 2002 which I received from the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (see annex). I should be grateful if you would bring it to the attention of the members of the Security Council. (Signed) Kofi A. Annan 02-68453 (E) 111102 *0268453* S/2002/1226 Annex Letter dated 5 November 2002 from the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization to the Secretary-General In accordance with Security Council resolution 1088 (1996), I attach the September monthly report on SFOR operations (see enclosure). I would appreciate your making this report available to the Security Council. (Signed) George Robertson 2 S/2002/1226 Enclosure Monthly report to the United Nations on the operations of the Stabilization Force 1. Over the reporting period (1-30 September 2002) there were almost 14,900 troops deployed in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia, with contributions from the NATO allies and from 15 non-NATO countries. 2. During the period under review, the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina remained stable, although there is general concern about increased ethnic tension in Sanski Most (west of Banja Luka) because of the growing number of Bosnian Serbs returning there, and in particular owing to the recent dedication by Bosnian Serbs of a controversial war memorial in the town, which is now inhabited for the most part by Bosniacs.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations / Ujedinjene Nacije / Уједињене Нације International
    United Nations / Ujedinjene nacije / Уједињене нације Office of the Resident Coordinator / Ured rezidentnog koordinatora / Уред резидентног координатора Bosnia and Herzegovina / Bosna i Hercegovina / Босна и Херцеговина International Humanitarian Assistance to BiH 29th May 2014 NOTE: This document represents compilation of data provided by listed embassies/organizations/institutions. The author is not responsible for accuracy of information received from outside sources. ORGANIZATION WHAT WHEN WHERE CATEGORY ADRA Current budget of 100,000 USD with Possibility of additional funding. 20/05/2014 Humanitarian aid, Full time local team to be emPloyed. WASH Early recovery Hundreds of volunteers engaged in PreParation and delivery of Doboj, Zavidovici, Vozuca, packages of food, water, hygiene items, clothes, infants’ utensils and Banja Luka, Bijeljina, medicines for PoPulation of affected areas. Samac and Orasje. Planed activities: Psychosocial support; Room dryers and 260dehumidifiers, expected to be here 26/05/2014. An engineer from Germany for one month; REDO water Purification unit (3,000l Per hour) will be shiPPed Doboj 26/05/2014; Debris Cleaning – Use of Effective Microorganisms (EM) to clean oil spills and other contaminations in and around houses, as well as rehabilitating agricultural land. Possible dePloyment of EM Expert Cleaning-up activities; Distribution of Relief Items; Technician for the Water distribution system and dryers 21/05/2014 Austria Since the beginning of the floods Austrian Humanitarian 28/05/2014 BIH Humanitarian
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA May, 2014 BASIC INFORMATION Project Title Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP BiH) and Development of the Fifth National Report to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) Project Acronym NBSAP BiH Project Duration Period January 2013 – December 2014 GEF Implementation United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP Agency GEF Operational Focal Point Senad Oprašić, PhD, Head of the Environmental Protection for Bosnia and Herzegovina Department at the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina (MoFTER BiH) UNCBD Focal Point for BiH Mehmed Cero, M. Sc., Assistant Minister in the Environment Sector of the FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MoET FBiH) 2 Client: FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism Supported by: United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP External Associate Experts: Senka Barudanović Stjepan Matić Radoslav Dekić Dragojla Golub Consultant: Centre for Energy, Environment and Resources (CENER 21) Translation and Proofreading: Gordana Lonco Edina Dmitrović Graphic Design: Tarik Hodžić 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank the following institutions for the support that they provided in the development of the Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) and through their participation in workshops, provision of data, information, comments and suggestions: Aarhus Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Zakona Planiraju Se I Podmiruju U Okviru Proračunskih Sredstava Na Poziciji Središnjeg Tijela Državne Uprave Nadležnog Za Poslove Regionalnog Razvoja
    PETAK, 27. OŽUJKA 2009. NARODNE NOVINE dodatak MEĐUNARODNI UGOVORI BROJ 3 - STRANICA 191 SLUŽBENI LIST REPUBLIKE HR VA TSKE (2) Irrespective of the national authorizing offi cer’s decision, the (2) Bez obzira na odluku nacionalnog dužnosnika za ovjeravanje, Commission may decide to maintain, suspend or withdraw the Komisija može odlučiti zadržati, obustaviti ili povući prijenos conferral of management powers on any of the bodies concer- ovlasti upravljanja na bilo koje odnosno tijelo u bilo kojem tre- ned at any time. nutku. (3) At all stages, the national authorizing offi cer shall ensure that all the information required by the Commission is provided by (3) U svim fazama, nacionalni dužnosnik za ovjeravanje osigurava the Benefi ciary. da korisnik osigura sve informacije koje zahtijeva Komisija. 20 FUTHER PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO THE IMPLEMENTA- 20. DODATNE ODREDBE PRIMJENJIVE NA PROVEDBU PREKO- TION OF CROSS-BORDER PROGRAMMES GRANIČNIH PROGRAMA (1) Th e operating structures in each participating benefi ciary co- (1) Operativne strukture u svakoj državi korisniku koja sudjeluje u untry shall include one implementing agency which shall be programu uključuju jednu provedbenu agenciju koja se osniva established within the national administration or under its di- unutar nacionalne uprave ili pod svojom izravnom kontrolom. rect control. (2) Th e national authorising offi cer in each participating benefi - (2) Nacionalni dužnosnik za ovjeravanje u svakoj državi korisniku ciary country shall, aft er consulting the national IPA co-ordi- koja sudjeluje u programu, nakon savjetovanja s nacionalnim nator, designate a programme authorising offi cer to head the koordinatorom za program IPA-u, imenuje dužnosnika za ovje- implementing agency.
    [Show full text]