DOCSLIB.ORG

Prosecution Final Trial Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IT-08-91-T 18146 D18146 - D17672 12 July 2012 SF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-08-91-T IN TRIAL CHAMBER 11 Before: Judge Burton Hall, Presiding Judge Guy Delvoie Judge Frederik Harhoff Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Date filed: 12 July 2012 PROSECUTOR v. Mico STANISIC Stojan ZUPLJANIN PUBLIC PROSECUTION'S NOTICE OF FILING A PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROSECUTION'S FINAL TRIAL BRIEF The Office of the Prosecutor: J oanna Korner Thomas Hannis Counsel for the Accused Slobodan Zecevic and Slobodan Cvijetic for Mico Stanisic Dragan Krgovic and Aleksandar Aleksic for Stojan Zupljanin IT-08-91-T 18145 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-08-91-T THE PROSECUTOR v. Mico STANISIC & Stojan ZUPLJANIN PUBLIC PROSECUTION'S NOTICE OF FILING A PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROSECUTION'S FINAL TRIAL BRIEF 1. The Prosecution hereby files a public red acted version of the Prosecution's Final Trial Brief,l attached at Annex A, pursuant to the Trial Chamber's 4 June 2012 "Order on filing of public red acted versions on final trial briefs,,2. 2. The Prosecution has red acted information that identifies protected witnesses,3 information that was brought into the court in private or closed session and information that reveals the content of exhibits filed under seal. 3. The corrections to the Final Trial Brief contained in the recently filed Corrigendum4 have been included in the public red acted version of the Prosecution's Final Trial Brief. Word Count: 330 Tom Hannis Senior Trial Attorney Dated this 12th day of July 2012 At The Hague, The Netherlands 1 Prosecutor v. Stanific and Zupljanin, Case No. IT-08-91-T, Prosecutor's Final Trial Brief, 14 May 2012, confidential. 2 Prosecutor v. Stanific and Zupljanin, Case No. IT-08-91-T, Order on filing of public redacted versions on final trial briefs, submitted by Trial Chamber 11,4 June 2012. 3 The Prosecutor v. Prlic et al., Case No. IT-04-74-T, Decision on Prosecution Motion for Clarification Concerning Preparation of Public Version of Final Trial Briefs, 25-Mar-20 11, public, pp.3-4. 4 Prosecutor v. Stanific and Zupljanin, Case No. IT-08-91-T, Prosecution's Corrigendum to the Prosecution's Final Trial Brief, lih July 2012, confidential. 1 Case No. IT-08-91-T 12 July 2012 IT-08-91-T 18144 ANNEXA to PROSECUTION'S NOTICE OF FILING A PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROSECUTION'S FINAL TRIAL BRIEF IT-08-91-T 18143 1. OVERVIEW 5 A. INJRODUCTION 5 B. STANIsIC'S INTERVIEW 7 C. INSIDER WnNEssEs 8 11. THE JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE 9 A. EMERGENCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMON PLAN 11 1. Regionalisation 11 2. Creation of Parallel Structures (Bosnian Serb Laws and Institutions) 13 3. Climate of Fear (including propaganda) 15 4. Variant AJB 16 5. The Strategic Goals 16 13. BACKGROUND TO Hili CREATION 01,' THE RSMUP 18 C. MEMBERSIIIP OF TIlE JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRlSE 21 D. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMON PLAN 23 1. Introduction 23 (a) Pattern of Attacks and Crimes 23 (i) Takeovers in each municipality 25 (ii) The Killing and Forcible Transfer of Non-Serbs 25 (b) Crimes that were the Natural and Forseeable Consequence of the Implementation of the Common Plan 28 2. Implementation of the Common plan at the Municipal Level 30 (0~ ~ (b) Bijeljina 34 (c) Banja Luka 39 i. Manjaca Camp 43 (d) Zvornik 47 (e) Gaeko 53 (t) Yisegrad 56 (g) Bosanski Samac 62 (h) Sanski Most 67 (i) Vlasenica 71 (j) Vogosca 80 (k) Prijedor (and Skender Vaknt) 85 (I) Brcko 97 (m) Doboj 102 (n) [)onji Vakur 112 (0) Kljuc 115 (p) Ilijas 122 (q) Teslic 127 (r) Kotor Yaros 134 (s) Bileca 140 (t) Uncharged Municipalities 144 3. Implementation of the Common plan at the Regional Level 149 (a) Autonomous Region of Krajina 149 (b) Northern Bosnia and CSB Doboj implemented the common plan 155 (c) Other Regions 157 (i) CSB Sarajevo 157 (ii) CSB Trebinje 159 4. Implementation of the Common Plan at the Repuhlie I .. evel 160 (a) Political Leadership 160 (h) Military 164 Case IT-08-9J-T 14 May 2012 IT-08-91-T 18142 (i) Arming and Mobilising the Serb Population 164 (ii) Creation ofthe VRS 166 (iii) Mladic 170 Ill. THE ACCUSED'S CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY UNDER .JOINT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE LIABILITY 172 A. INJRODUCTION 172 H. ST AN ISle CONTRIBUTED SIGNIFICANT!.Y TO THE COMMON PI.AN 174 1. STANISIC contributed to the creation of the plan 174 2. ST AN IS le participated in the formation of Serh hodies and forces that implemented the forcible takeovers of the municipalities 175 3. STANISIC participated in the development of Serb policy at the leadership level in order to secure the takeovers of the municipalities and forcihle rcmoval of the non-Serh population 179 4. ST AN IS le communicated and coordinated with Serh political and military leaders 181 5. STANISIC commanded RSMUP members acting in coordination with CSs, VRS and other Serb forces and assisted in coordinating joint VRS-RSMUP operations 184 6. ST AN IS le facilitatcd the estahlishment and opcration of dctcntion facilities where non- Serb detainees were mistTeated and killed 187 (a) sTANIi'aC was awarc of, and supported, the role of the police in establishing and operating detention Pacilities at which non-Serbs were held 187 (b) STANISIC aided in the Government's "cover-up" ofthe detention facilities 191 7. STANISIC failed to take adequate measures to protect the non-Serb population and cnsurc that crimes committed against them were investigated and prosecuted 194 (a) STANISIC had the duty to act 195 (b) STAN ISIC had the ability to act 196 (c) STANTSTC failed to protect the non-Serb population 200 (i) STANTSTC focused his resources on combating looting of RS property 202 (ii) STANISIC also focused his resources on documenting and investigating war crimes against Serbs 204 (iii) STANISIC's operation against the Yellow Wasps 207 C. ZUPLJANIN CONTRlllUW!) SIGNll'1CANTLY TO THE COMMON PLAN 211 I. ZUPIJANIN was closely connected with the HSI. 212 2. ZUPLJANIN participated in the formation of Serb bodies and forces to implement takeovers 212 3. Zupljanin participatcd in the forming, financing, supplying, supporting and commanding of special police units in the ARK and SAO Northern I30snia 214 (i) CSI3 I3anja Luka Special Police Detachment 214 4. Suhsequent CS H Special Police Units 222 (i) S.lB Special Police Units 223 5. Assisted in coordination of joint VRS-RSMUP Operations 225 6. ZUPIJANIN facilitated, estahlished and oversaw detention facilities in the ARK 228 (a) Through his approving silence to information received from his subordinates, 7:UPT ..TANTN encouraged police participation in the detention facilities 230 (b) 7:UPUANTN Encouraged Police Participation in the Detention Facilities by Visiting a Number of these Pacilities 234 (c) ZUPL.TANIN's Active Support of the Detention Pacilities 235 (d) ZUPL.TANLN's Role in the Cover-Up of ARK Detention Facilities After Their International Exposure 241 7. ZUPLJANIN Failed to Take Adequate Measmes to Protect the Non-Serb Population and Ensme that Crimes Committed Against Them Were Investigated and Prosecuted 245 IV. THE ACCUSED'S CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY UNDER OTHER I<'ORMS OF ARTICLE 7(1) LIABILITY 250 A. THE ACCUSE!) A]J)E!) AN!) AllElTE!) THE CRIMES CHARGE!) IN THE INJ)]CI'MENT 250 2 Case JT-08-91-T 14 May 2012 IT-08-91-T 18141 1. STANISIC aided and abetted the crimes in the Indictment 251 (a) Though his acts and omissions, STANISIC provided practical assistance, encouragement or moral support that had a substantial effect on the crimes in the Indictment 251 (b) STANISIC was aware of the probability that the principal perpetrators would commit the crimes in the Indictment, and that his acts and omissions would assist the principal perpetrators in committing the crimes in the Indictment 252 2, ZUPLJANIN aided and abetted the crimes in the Indictment 252 (a) Though his acts and omissions, ZUPLJANIN provided practical assistance, encouragement or moral support that had a substantial effect on the crimes in the Indictment 252 (h) 7:UPT ,JANTN was aware or the prohahility that the principal perpetrators would prohahly commit the crimes in the Indictment, and that his acts and omissions would assist the principal perpetrators in committing the crimes in the Indictment 253 V. STANISIC AND ZUPLJANIN ARE CULPABLE UNDER SUPERIOR RESPONSIDILITY 253 A. THE ACCUSED HAD EFFECTIVE CONTROl. OVER THEIR SUBORDINATES 255 1. The accused exercised administrative authority over a highly-organised and hierarchical police force 257 2. The Accused exercised a high degree of control over police information 260 3. The Accused had the authority to undertake criminal and disciplinary procedures against their suhordinates 264 4. The Accused Had Resources Available to Impose Their Authority on Their Subordinates269 5. The CSs did not diminish the Accused's effective control 270 6. The VRS did not diminish the Accused's effective control 273 B. TIlE ACCUSED KNEW OR HAIl REASON TO KNOW THAT THEIR SUBORDINATES WERE COMMITTING CRIMES CHARGED IN THE INDICTMENT 277 1. The reporting system within the RSMUP provided the Accused with timely information concerning the criminal activities of subordinates 278 2. Knowledge of Suhordinates' Participation in the Unlawful Detention of the Non-Serh Population and the Mistreatment of Non-Serb Detainees 280 3. Knowledge of Suhordinates' Participation in Unlawful Attacks on Non-Serh Villages 285 4. Knowledge of Subordinates' Participation in Expulsions of Non-Serbs 286 5. Knowledge of Subordinates' Other Serious Crimes against the Non-Serb Population 287 C. THE ACCUSED FAIT ,ED TO TAKE NECESSARY AND REASONABT,E MEAS1JRES TO PREVENT OR PUNISH POLICE CRIMES 290 I.
Recommended publications
  • Sectarian Divide Continues to Hamper Residual Return and Reintegration of the Displaced

    Sectarian Divide Continues to Hamper Residual Return and Reintegration of the Displaced

    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA: Sectarian divide continues to hamper residual return and reintegration of the displaced A profile of the internal displacement situation 25 October, 2006 This Internal Displacement Profile is automatically generated from the online IDP database of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC). It includes an overview of the internal displacement situation in the country prepared by the IDMC, followed by a compilation of excerpts from relevant reports by a variety of different sources. All headlines as well as the bullet point summaries at the beginning of each chapter were added by the IDMC to facilitate navigation through the Profile. Where dates in brackets are added to headlines, they indicate the publication date of the most recent source used in the respective chapter. The views expressed in the reports compiled in this Profile are not necessarily shared by the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. The Profile is also available online at www.internal-displacement.org. About the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, established in 1998 by the Norwegian Refugee Council, is the leading international body monitoring conflict-induced internal displacement worldwide. Through its work, the Centre contributes to improving national and international capacities to protect and assist the millions of people around the globe who have been displaced within their own country as a result of conflicts or human rights violations. At the request of the United Nations, the Geneva-based Centre runs an online database providing comprehensive information and analysis on internal displacement in some 50 countries. Based on its monitoring and data collection activities, the Centre advocates for durable solutions to the plight of the internally displaced in line with international standards.
  • Microsoft Powerpoint

    Microsoft Powerpoint

    Workshop on WATER-FOOD-ENERGY-ECOSYSTEMS NEXUS ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN Sectoral goals in the Sava River Basin B&H : Strategic orientation in energy sector Zagreb, 4.3.’14. Prof. Tarik Kupusović Ph.D. C.E. Key Questions Increased demand 1. Can 9 billion people be 50% by 2030 (IEA) fed equitably, healthily Energy and sustainably? 2. Can we cope with the Climate future demands on Change water? Food Water 3. Can we provide enough Increased demand Increased demand energy to supply the 50% by 2030 30% by 2030 growing population (FAO) (IFPRI) coming out of poverty? 4. Can we mitigate and adapt to climate change? Biodiversity 5. Can we do all this in the context of redressing the The Perfect Storm? decline in biodiversity and preserving ecosystems? USA EPA, 2012 Could the warming be natural? Global temperatures are on the rise. Source: Knutti & Sedlacek (2012) 6 Produce more fuel-efficient vehicles Reduce vehicle use Improve energy-efficiency in buildings Develop carbon capture and storage processes Triple nuclear power Increase solar power Decrease deforestation/plant forests Improve soil carbon management strategies (USA Strategy) Content Introduction Hydropower potential in B&H Climate change and water demand Measures of adaptation Environmental Flow sub-law Construction of hydropower plants in B&H Advantages of hydropower over the other sources Conclusion Introduction total surface area of 51,197 km² seven river basins (75.5% belong to the Black Sea ,24.3 % to the Adriatic Sea catchment) average annual precipitation
  • Project Document

    Project Document

    United Nations Development Programme Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina PROJECT DOCUMENT Project Title: Technology transfer for climate resilient flood management in Vrbas River Basin Project Title: Technology transfer for climate resilient flood management in Vrbas River Basin UNDAF Outcome(s): Outcome 5: By 2019 legal and strategic frameworks are enhanced and operationalized to UNDAF Outcome(s): Outcome 5: By 2019 legal and strategic frameworks are enhanced and operationalized to ensure sustainable management of natural, cultural and energy resources. ensure sustainable management of natural, cultural and energy resources. UNDP Strategic Plan Primary Outcome: 1. Growth and development are inclusive and sustainable, incorporating UNDP Strategic Plan Primary Outcome: 1. Growth and development are inclusive and sustainable, incorporating productive capacities that create employment and livelihoods for the poor and excluded. UNDP Strategic Plan productive capacities that create employment and livelihoods for the poor and excluded. Output: 1.4 Scaled up action Output: 1.4 Scaled up action on climate change adaptation and mitigation across sectors which is funded and on climate change adaptation and mitigation across sectors which is funded and implemented implemented Expected CP Outcome(s): Expected CP Outcome(s): Outcome 5: By 2019 legal and strategic frameworks are enhanced and operationalized to ensure sustainable Outcome 5: By 2019 legal and strategic frameworks are enhanced and operationalized to ensure sustainable management of natural, cultural and energy resources. management of natural, cultural and energy resources. Expected CPD Output (s) Expected CPAP Output (s) Lead output: Output 5.2: Subnational actors implement climate change adaptation (CCA) and mitigation measures, Lead output: Output 5.2: Subnational actors implement climate change adaptation (CCA) and mitigation measures, sustainable energy access solutions, and manage natural resources sustainably.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Management Framework Public Disclosure Authorized Floods Emergency Recovery Project Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina September, 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized CONTROL SHEET Client: Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry Project: Floods Emergency Recovery Project (FERP) Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Title: Environmental Management Framework Status: Final Document Accounting Code: D-1172 Registry No.: UP-02-996/11 Project manager: Internal control: Director: Name and surname, Dr Irem Silajdžić, M.Sc Sanda Midžić Prof. dr. Tarik title B.Sc.Envtl.Eng. Kurtagić, Kupusović, B.Sc.C.E. B.Sc.C.E. DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE 15.08.2014 i GENERAL DATA Consultant: Hydro-Engineering Institute of Civil Engineering Faculty Sarajevo Stjepana Tomića 1 71000 Sarajevo tel: + 387 33 212 466/7 fax: + 387 33 207 949 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.heis.com.ba Project Dr Irem Silajdžić, M.SC. Environmental Technology, B.Sc. Environmental Engineering team: Melina Džajić Valjevac, M.Sc. Chemistry Vukašin Balta, M.Sc. Geology Admir Alađuz, B.Sc Biology Selma Osmanagić Klico, expert for environmental law ii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BAM – the currency code for Convertible Marka B&H – Bosnia and Herzegovina BP – Bank Procedure EA – Environmental Assessment EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EIS – Environmental Impact Study EMF – Environmental Management Framework EMP – Environmental Management
  • Provenance of the Bosnian Flysch

    Provenance of the Bosnian Flysch

    1661-8726/08/01S031-24 Swiss J. Geosci. 101 (2008) Supplement 1, S31–S54 DOI 10.1007/s00015-008-1291-z Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2008 Provenance of the Bosnian Flysch TAMÁS MIKES 1, 7, *, DOMINIK CHRIST 1, 8, RÜDIGER PETRI 1, ISTVÁN DUNKL1, DIRK FREI 2, MÁRIA BÁLDI-BEKE 3, JOACHIM REITNER 4, KLAUS WEMMER 5, HAZIM HRVATOVIć 6 & HILMAR VON EYNAttEN 1 Key words: Dinarides, Adriatic plate, ophiolite, flysch, Cretaceous, provenance, geochronology, biostratigraphy, mineral chemistry ABSTRACT Sandwiched between the Adriatic Carbonate Platform and the Dinaride olitic thrust sheets and by redeposited elements of coeval Urgonian facies reefs Ophiolite Zone, the Bosnian Flysch forms a c. 3000 m thick, intensely folded grown on the thrust wedge complex. Following mid-Cretaceous deformation stack of Upper Jurassic to Cretaceous mixed carbonate and siliciclastic sedi- and thermal overprint of the Vranduk Formation, the depozone migrated fur- ments in the Dinarides. New petrographic, heavy mineral, zircon U/Pb and ther towards SW and received increasing amounts of redeposited carbonate fission-track data as well as biostratigraphic evidence allow us to reconstruct detritus released from the Adriatic Carbonate Platform margin (Ugar Forma- the palaeogeology of the source areas of the Bosnian Flysch basin in late Me- tion). Subordinate siliciclastic source components indicate changing source sozoic times. Middle Jurassic intraoceanic subduction of the Neotethys was rocks on the upper plate, with ophiolites becoming subordinate. The zone shortly followed by exhumation of the overriding oceanic plate. Trench sedi- of the continental basement previously affected by the Late Jurassic–Early mentation was controlled by a dual sediment supply from the sub-ophiolitic Cretaceous thermal imprint has been removed; instead, the basement mostly high-grade metamorphic soles and from the distal continental margin of the supplied detritus with a wide range of pre-Jurassic cooling ages.
  • WBEC-REG-ENE-01 Final Report Author

    WBEC-REG-ENE-01 Final Report Author

    Code: WBEC-REG-ENE-01 REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Final Report August 2018 IPA 2011-WBIF-Infrastructure Project Facility- Technical Assistance 3 EuropeAid/131160/C/SER/MULTI/3C This project is funded by the European Union Information Class: EU Standard formation Class: EU Standard The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald IPF Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This r epor thas been prepared solely for use by the party which commissioned it (the ‘Client’) in connection with the captioned project. It should not be used for any other purpose. No person other than the Client or any party who has expressly agreed terms of r eliance with us ( the ‘Recipient(s)’) may r ely on the content, information or any views expressed in the report. We accept no duty of care, responsibility or liability to any other recipient of this document.
  • JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER United Nations (Exclusively for the Use of the Media

    JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER United Nations (Exclusively for the Use of the Media

    JUDGEMENT SUMMARY TRIAL CHAMBER United Nations (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) Nations Unies The Hague, 27 March 2013 Trial Chamber Judgement Summary for Mićo Stanišić and Stojan Župljanin International Please find below the summary of the Judgement read out today by Judge Burton Criminal Tribunal for the former Hall. Yugoslavia Tribunal Pénal The Trial Chamber is sitting today to deliver its Judgement in the case of Prosecutor International pour v. Mićo Stanišić and Stojan Župljanin. I now read a summary of the Chamber’s findings. The l’ex-Yougoslavie full written Judgement will be made available at the end of today’s hearing. At the outset, the Chamber wishes to express its gratitude to counsel for the Prosecution and the Defence, the Registry staff, the Chamber’s own staff, and all others who have contributed to the conduct of this trial. The Judgement is a lengthy document, reflecting the size and complexity of this case. The trial commenced on 14 September 2009 and concluded on 1 June 2012. The Trial Chamber sat for 354 days, during which it admitted the evidence of 199 witnesses, entered 4,377 exhibits into evidence, and took judicial notice of 1,042 adjudicated facts. The concept of a Greater Serbia has a long history. One of its aspects was the extension of Serbia into those portions of Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina containing substantial Serb populations. This was strongly pursued in the late 1980s and on into the 1990s. Through public speeches and the media, Serbian political leaders emphasised a glorious past and informed their audiences that, if Serbs did not join together, they would again be attacked by Ustashas, a term used to instil fear in Serbs.
  • Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina

    COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Number: X-KR-07/442 Sarajevo, 30 October 2009 IN THE NAME OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Panel composed of Judge Šaban Maksumić as the Presiding Judge and Judges Marie Tuma and Carol Peralta as members of the Panel, with the participation of the Legal Advisor Lejla Konjić as the records-taker, in the criminal case against the accused Predrag Kujundžić for the criminal offence of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in conjunction with paragraphs (a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (k) in conjunction with Articles 29, 30 and 31 as read with Article 180(1) and (2) of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CC of BiH), deciding upon the Indictment by the Prosecutor’s Office of BiH, number: KT-RZ-131/05 of 26 December 2007, amended on 29 May 2009, upon the public main trial in a part of which the public was excluded, in the presence of the Prosecutor with the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Božidarka Dodik, accused Predrag Kujundžić and the Defence Counsels for the accused, lawyers Miroslav Ristić and Goran Nešković, on 30 October 2009 rendered and publicly announced the following V E R D I C T Accused: PREDRAG KUJUNDŽIĆ a.k.a. Predo, son of Vasilije and Dušanka née Tomić, born on 30 January 1961 in the village of Suho Polje, Doboj municipality, personal identification number: 3001961120044, Serb by ethnicity, citizen of BiH, welder by occupation, average financial situation, with residence in the village of Suho Polje bb (no number), Doboj municipality, apprehended on 10 October 2007, 1.
  • MICO STANISIC with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, and VIOLATIONS of the LAWS OR CUSTOMS of WAR, As Set Forth Below

    MICO STANISIC with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, and VIOLATIONS of the LAWS OR CUSTOMS of WAR, As Set Forth Below

    ~'''Cof-)-'1-fr D I ~~:}-o .- 0 I ~I.f t'1 z:~.. J ~ 41-,..., dL>-L z,,, s- THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CASE NO. IT-04-79-PT THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST MICO ST ANISIC REVISED AMENDED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia ("the Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: MICO STANISIC with CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, and VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OR CUSTOMS OF WAR, as set forth below: THE ACCUSED 1. Mico STANISH: was born on 30 June 1954, in the village of Ponor, Pale Municipality, in Bosnia and Herzegovina ("BiH"). He graduated from law school in Sarajevo. From 21 December 1991, Mico STANISIC was Minister Without Portfolio of the Council of Ministers which was named by the Assembly of the Serbian People of BiH. From 1 April 1992, he was Minister of the newly established Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs in BiH ("RS MUP"). Case No. IT-04-79-PT 1 22 September 2005 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/6cd663/ INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY Position of Accused/Superior Authority 2. Mico STANISIC, as Minister of the RS MUP, was the highest authority in the MUP. His official responsibility included public and state security. 3. In his capacity as Minister of the RS MUP, Mico STANISIC had overall authority and responsibility for the functioning of the members and agents of the RS MUP. All members and agents of the RS MUP were subordinate to Mico STANISIC.
  • Book of Abstracts

    Book of Abstracts

    Green Room Sessions 2018 International GEA (Geo Eco-Eco Agro) Conference - Book of Abstracts GREEN ROOM SESSIONS 2018 International GEA (Geo Eco-Eco Agro) Conference 1-3 November 2018, Podgorica, Montenegro BOOK OF ABSTRACTS University of Montenegro, Faculty of Philosophy, Geography, Montenegro University of Montenegro, Faculty of Architecture, Montenegro University of Montenegro, Biotechnical Faculty, Montenegro University of Montenegro, Institute of Marin Biology, Montenegro Perm State Agro-Technological University, Russia Voronezh State Agricultural University, Russia Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food, Skopje, Macedonia University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuania University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture and Food Science, B&H Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Natural Resources, Iran Watershed Management Society, Iran University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, RS, B&H University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture, RS, B&H Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi Sad, Serbia Balkan Scientific Association of Agricultural Economists University of Dzemal Bijedic, Mostar, Agromediterranean Faculty, B&H University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Hotel Management &Tourism Vrnjacka Banja Institute of Meteorology and Seismology of Montenegro National Parks of Montenegro Put Gross, Montenegro Eko ekvilibrijum, Montenegro National Association of Sommeliers of Montenegro Centar za samorazvoj i unapredjenje drustva Editor in Chief: Velibor Spalevic Publiher: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Montenegro Printing house: Grafo group doo Podgorica Circulation: 250 Website: www.greenrooms.me Photo front page: Aleksandar Jaredic / Ribo Raicevic CIP - Kaталогизација у публикацији Национална библиотека Црне Горе, Цетиње ISBN 978-86-7798-112-9 COBISS.CG-ID 36811792 2 Green Room Sessions 2018 International GEA (Geo Eco-Eco Agro) Conference - Book of Abstracts Honorary Committee Prof.
  • Mapa Katastarskih Opština Republike Srpske

    Mapa Katastarskih Opština Republike Srpske

    Mapa katastarskih opština Republike Srpske Donja Gradina Čuklinac Glavinac Kostajnica Petrinja Mlinarice Draksenić Babinac Bačvani Tavija Demirovac Suvaja KOSTAJNICA Jošik Vrioci Međeđa Mrakodol Gornja Johova Komlenac Orahova Slabinja Grdanovac Ševarlije Donja Slabinja Kozarska Kozarska Verija Dubica 1 Dubica 2 Mrazovci Bok Gumnjani Klekovci Jankovac Tuključani Gašnica Kalenderi Podoška Pobrđani Dobrljin Mraovo Dizdarlije Jasenje Parnice Novoselci Gunjevci Polje Hadžibajir Ličani Mačkovac Čelebinci Aginci Sključani Božići Donje Gradiška 1 Orubica Kuljani Sreflije Bistrica Kozinci Pobrđani Veliko KOZARSKA DUBICA Čitluk Dvorište Brekinje Bijakovac Greda Gornje Furde Ušivac Pucari Gornja Dolina Vodičevo Malo Bosanski Brod Vlaškovci Jelovac Čatrnja Brestovčina Donje Vodičevo Dvorište Gradiška 2 Kadin Novo Selo Bjelajci Donja Dolina Poloj Sovjak Gaj Strigova Međuvođe Gornje Jablanica Trebovljani Murati Mirkovci Vlaknica Ravnice Odžinci Sreflije Liskovac Dumbrava Miloševo Brdo Žeravica Laminci Jaružani Cerovica Vrbaška Bardača Močila Križanova Laminci Sijekovac Donja Gornja Rakovica Bukovac Laminci Brezici Srednji Srbac Selo Gradina Močila Gornja Prusci Hajderovci Brusnik Čikule Kolibe Donje Velika Lješljani Donji Jelovac Bajinci Gornjoselci Mala Žuljevica Kriva Rijeka Sjeverovci Srbac Mjesto Kaoci Žuljevica Maglajci Koturovi Lužani Grabašnica Jutrogošta Laminci Dubrave Dugo Polje Vojskova Dubrave Liješće Mlječanica Devetaci Bukvik Rasavac Poljavnice Donji Podgradci Kobaš Mazići Rakovac Košuća Kolibe Gornje Nova Ves Novo Selo Zbjeg Dragelji
  • MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED

    MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED

    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-00-39 & 40-PT THE PROSECUTOR OF THE TRIBUNAL AGAINST MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC AMENDED CONSOLIDATED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ("the Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: MOMCILO KRAJISNIK and BILJANA PLAVSIC with GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS AND CUSTOMS OF WAR as set forth below: THE ACCUSED 1. Momcilo KRAJISNIK, son of Sreten and Milka (née Spiric) was born on 20 January 1945 in Zabrdje, municipality of Novi Grad, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. He was a leading member of the Serbian Democratic Party of Bosnia and Herzegovina ("SDS") and he served on a number of SDS bodies and committees. On 12 July 1991, Momcilo KRAJISNIK was elected to the Main Board of the SDS. He was President of the Assembly of Serbian People in Bosnia and Herzegovina ("Bosnian Serb Assembly") from 24 October 1991 until at least November 1995. He was a member of the National Security Council of the Bosnian Serb Republic and from the beginning of June 1992 until 17 December 1992, he was a member of the expanded Presidency of the Bosnian Serb Republic. 2. Biljana PLAVSIC, daughter of Svetislav, was born on 7 July 1930 in Tuzla, Tuzla municipality, Bosnia and Herzegovina. She was a leading member of the SDS from the period of its establishment in Bosnia and Herzegovina. From 18 November 1990 until April 1992, Biljana PLAVSIC was a member of the collective Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina.