DOCSLIB.ORG

Implications of Climate Change for Sava River Basin Water Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

International Workshop on Integrated Transboundary Water Resources Management in Southeastern Europe Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina 18 -20 May, 2009 IMPLICATIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE FOR SAVA RIVER BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT David Meerbach, Janusz Kindler, Peter Shanahan, Kenneth Strzepek , The World Bank BackgroundBackground ► Investments: Sava Waterway Rehabilitation Project, BiH, Croatia and Serbia Irrigation Projects, Croatia Inland Waters – what about the climate? ► World Bank priority - various initiatives ► ESW SE Europe Water and Climate Adaptation Project ► Objective s to inform government policy and the development community on approaches to adapt water resources management, planning and operations to the forecasted impact of climate change . to enhance the climate resilience of selected water sector investments and to stimulate debate among key stakeholders in the water resurces sector in SEE on climate -related impacts and adaptation strategies. ScopeScope ►►TaskTask 11 –– PreliminaryPreliminary WaterWater andand ClimateClimate AdaptationAdaptation PlanPlan (WATCAP)(WATCAP) –– SavaSava RiverRiver BasinBasin –– JulyJuly 20092009 ►►TaskTask 22 –– PreliminaryPreliminary WATCAPWATCAP –– 22nd basinbasin ►►TaskTask 33 –– TwoTwo adaptationadaptation plans,plans, firstfirst byby JulyJuly 20102010 ►►TaskTask 44 –– AdaptationAdaptation investmentinvestment guidelinesguidelines ►►TaskTask 55 –– Consultations,Consultations, reviewreview (2010(2010 --JulyJuly 2011)2011) WATCAPWATCAP ► WATCAP is based on: Hydrological Modeling Climate Change Assessment Water Management Assessment: Inventory of river basin characteristics, data availability, institutional capacity ► WATCAP is envisaged to consist of: (i) a watershed or sub -basin characterization; (ii) an impact/risk assessment for a number of scenarios, identifying threats and opportunities related to climate change; and (iii) appraisal of a number of scenarios with alternatives for adaptive management actio MethodologyMethodology –– learninglearning --byby --doingdoing CurrentCurrent statusstatus ►► ExperiencedExperienced teamteam mobilizedmobilized ►► FirstFirst exploratoryexploratory missionmission toto thethe region,region, allall 44 ISRBCISRBC membermember countriescountries visited.visited. ►► EngagingEngaging inin partnershipspartnerships withwith regionalregional counterpartscounterparts ►► FirstFirst findingsfindings presentedpresented todaytoday –– workwork inin progressprogress ClimateClimate changechange assessmentassessment FutureFuture ClimateClimate isis UncertainUncertain EconomicEconomic && ModelModel UncertaintyUncertainty Increased Droughts TemperatureTemperature ResultsResults fromfrom SINTASINTA (SI mulations of climate cha Nge in the medi Terranean Area) Republic HydroMeteorological Service of Serbia Belgrade University Instituto Nazionale i Geofisica e Vulcanologia (Italy) Centro Euro -Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici (Italy) Current Analysis on Climate Change ► Current Analysis on Climate Change Regional models in development, suitable to inform water management planning and have river basin level analysis Regional models only for limited number of GCMs, not covering all range ► Further work: • Select a set of GCMs that span the range of CC impacts for SRB Possibly dynamic downscaling of selected GCM results over the SRB ► Use University of Belgrade Eta Regional Climate model ► Use HADLEY Centre PRECIS Regional Climate model at HM Serbia Prepare a complete set of GCM and RCM climate change scenarios for the SRB jointly with local historic climate data WaterWater andand ClimateClimate AdaptationAdaptation World Bank Anchor Climate/ catchment modeling HistoricHistoric waterwater balancesbalances Sava at Ljubljanica 2000 1500 Sava at Beograd 1000 RO 2000 Precip 1500 500 ET 1000 Annual water balance (mm) water balance Annual 0 Precip RO Precip ET & Runoff 500 ET Kupa Annual water balance (mm) balance water Annual 0 Precip ET & Runoff 2000 1500 Drina 1000 RO Precip 2000 500 ET 1500 Annual water balance(mm) Annual water 0 Precip ET & Runoff 1000 RO Precip Vrbas 500 ET 2000 (mm) balance water Annual 0 Precip ET & Runoff 1500 1000 RO Precip 500 ET Annual water balance (mm) Annual water 0 Precip ET & Runoff Data source: Dr Stevan Prohaska, 2009. Hydrology Report for the Sava River Basin Analysis, Final Report. International Sava River Basin Commission. 20302030 waterwater balancesbalances Sava at Ljubljanica 2000 1500 Sava at Beograd 1000 RO 2000 Precip 500 1500 ET Annual water balance (mm) balance water Annual 0 1000 Precip ET & Runoff Precip RO 500 Kupa ET Annual water balance (mm) balance water Annual 0 2000 Precip ET & Runoff 1500 1000 RO Drina Precip 500 2000 ET Annual water balance (mm) water balance Annual 0 1500 Precip ET & Runoff 1000 RO Precip Vrbas 500 2000 ET Annual water balance (mm) balance water Annual 0 1500 Precip ET & Runoff 1000 RO Precip 500 ET Annual water balance (mm) water balance Annual 0 For Scen. B1 Precip ET & Runoff Hydrologic Implication Hydrologic Model Results Annual Runoff Acc . to A2 scenario by ISPL Model HydrologicHydrologic ImplicationImplication RegionalRegional HydrologicHydrologic ModelModel ResultsResults Annual Runoff Acc. to A2 scenario by Hadley Model Next Steps for Hydrologic Analyses for Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation ►Develop a comprehensive hydrologic model of the entire SRB ►Each major tributary should be modeled at a detailed watershed level ►Smallest Spatial Scale appropriate for streamflow /climate data and GCM and RCM ►Daily /10 day/ Monthly time scale ►As appropriate Monte Carlo generation of alternative climate time series should be developed ►Analyze climate change in risk-base planning framework IWTIWT -- RehabilitationRehabilitation ofof SavaSava RiverRiver Waterway,Waterway, in the context of the IWRM and development of the multimodal regional transport system Rhine – Main – Donau Corridor Xb (Road) Corridor Vb (Rail) DANUBE RIVER Ljubljana Zagreb Corridor X (Road) Corridor X (Rail) Brezice Slovanski Samac Sr. Mitrovica Brod DANUBE RIVER Sisak Bosanski Brcko Sabac Belgrade Constanta SAVA RIVER (Port) Corridor Vb (Rail) Brod Corridor Vb (Road) Rijeka (Port) Banja Luka Maritime corridor Sarajevo Maritime Split corridor Corridor Vc (Road) Corridor Vc (Rail) Maritime corridor Ploce (Port) Maritime corridor HistoricHistoric monthlymonthly averageaverage riverriver dischargedischarge alongalong SavaSava RiverRiver mainstemmainstem 4500 4000 3500 /s) 3 Sremska 3000 Mitrovica Slavonski 2500 Brod Zagreb 2000 1500 Based on Monthly average flow (m averageflow Monthly 1000 discharge records for 500 1926-1965 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Source: Dr Stevan Prohaska, 2009. Hydrology Report for the Sava River Basin Analysis, Final Report. International Sava River Basin Commission. International Sava River Basin Commission. Commission. Basin River Sava International Repor Hydrology 2009. Prohaska, Stevan Source: Dr Historic 10 Historic Historic 10 Historic River discharge (m3/s) 1200 1600 400 800 0 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Jesenice Radovljica Prebacevo Sv. Jakob Litija Radece Catez Riverkilometer Zagreb Rugvice - - Crnac low flow year year low flow year Jasenovac Median flow Mackovac Davor Kobas t for the Sava River Basin Analysis, Final Report. Final Report. Analysis, Basin River t for Sava the 10-year low flow10-year low Brod Zupanja Raca Sremska Mitrovica Beograd River discharge (m3/s) 1200 1600 400 800 2030 10 2030 2030 10 2030 0 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Jesenice Radovljica Prebacevo Sv. Jakob Litija Radece Catez - Riverkilometer Zagreb Rugvice - year low flow year year low flow year Historic Crnac Jasenovac Median flowMedian Mackovac Davor Kobas 10-year flowlow Brod 2030 Zupanja Raca Sremska Mitrovica Beograd IPCC Scenario B1 Scenario IPCC on Based IPCC Scenario B1 Scenario IPCC on Based Towards IWT and climate adaptation Analysis Adaptation options ► River basin modeling ► Design parameters ► Streamflow modeling ► River dredging ► Hydromorphologic ► River training works modelling/1D-2D ► Upstream control ► Modeling of climate structures (reservoirs, scenarios weirs) for low flow ► Modeling of transport augmentation scenarios ► Rail or road transport FloodFlood plains,plains, wetlands,wetlands, ecosystemecosystem servicesservices andand floodflood protectionprotection Indicative map of important flood -prone areas in the SRB Characterization of the SRB, ISRBC HistoricHistoric flowflow --durationduration curvecurve forfor SavaSava RiverRiver atat SlavonskiSlavonski BrodBrod 10000 8000 6000 4000 /s) 3 2000 1000 800 600 400 Mean daily discharge (m discharge daily Mean 200 100 0.01 0.2 2 20 50 80 98 99.8 99.99 Percentage of time discharge was exceeded Source: Dr Stevan Prohaska, Hydrology Report for the Sava River Basin Analysis, Final Report. International Sava River Basin Commission. FlowFlow --durationduration curvescurves forfor SavaSava RiverRiver atat SlavonskiSlavonski BrodBrod inin 20302030 10000 8000 6000 4000 /s) 3 2000 Envelope of wettest predictions from 1000 IPCC scenarios 800 600 400 Envelope of driest Mean daily discharge(m predictions from 200 IPCC scenarios 100 0.01 0.2 2 20 50 80 98 99.899.99 Percentage of time discharge was exceeded International Sava River Basin Commission. Commission. Basin River Sava International for t Report Hydrology Prohaska, Stevan Source: Dr Historic 100 Historic Historic 100 Historic River discharge (m3/s) 2000 4000 6000 8000 0 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Jesenice Radovljica Prebacevo Sv. Jakob 100-year flood 100-yearflow flood Litija
Recommended publications
  • National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive

    National Reviews 1998 Bosnia and Herzegovina Executive

    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants. The tasks were laid out in specific Terms of Reference. At a Regional Workshop in Budapest from 27 to 29 January 1998, the national teams and the group of international consultants discussed in detail the methodological approach and the content of the National Reviews to assure coherence of results.
  • The-Prijedor-Genocide 1

    The-Prijedor-Genocide 1

    PART 1. THE PRIJEDOR GENOCIDE The Prijedor genocide [1][2][3] , refers to numerous war crimes committed during the Bosnian war by the Serb political and military leadership mostly on Bosniak civilians in the Prijedor region of Bosnia-Herzegovina. After the Srebrenica genocide, it is the second largest massacre committed during the Bosnian war in 1992. Around 5,200 Bosniaks and Croats from Prijedor are missing or were killed during the massacre period, and around 14,000 people in the wider region of Prijedor (Pounje). [4] Contents • 1 Background • 2 Political developments before the takeover • 3 Takeover • 4 Armed attacks against the civilians o 4.1 Propaganda o 4.2 Strengthening of Serb forces o 4.3 Marking of non-Serb houses o 4.4 Attack on Hambarine o 4.5 Attack on Kozarac • 5 Camps o 5.1 Keraterm camp o 5.2 Omarska camp o 5.3 Trnopolje camp o 5.4 Other detention facilities • 6 Killings in the camps • 7 References • 8 See also • 9 External links Background Following Slovenia’s and Croatia’s declarations of independence in June 1991, the situation in the Prijedor municipality rapidly deteriorated. During the war in Croatia, the tension increased between the Serbs and the communities of Bosniaks and Croats. Bosniaks and Croats began to leave the municipality because of a growing sense of insecurity and fear amongst the population which was caused by Serb propaganda which became increasingly visible. The municipal newspaper Kozarski Vjesnik started publishing allegations against the non-Serbs. The Serb media propagandised the idea that the Serbs had to arm themselves.
  • Sustainable Hydropower

    Sustainable Hydropower

    Sustainable Hydropower Skadar Lake, Montenegro. © Wi in the Dinaric Arc UPDATE L Issue 4 / May 2013 d Wonder 2013 S of e urope Mi L an r adi S ic S / WW f Fresh water This newsletter provides information on the latest developments of the Dinaric Arc Sustainable Hydropower Initiative (DASHI) as well as further news on freshwater and hydropower in the region. DASHI, launched by WWF in 2011, aims to reduce the adverse impacts of hydropower development in the Western Balkans and to promote good practices in the region. The Initiative focuses on the protection of the region’s most precious freshwater ecosystems, in particular Ramsar wetlands such as Livanjsko Polje and Hutovo Blato in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Lake Skadar shared by Albania and Montenegro. HYDROPOWER NEWS FROM THE REGION WWF reveals the undiscovered world of Dinarides Through the Dinaric Arc Parks project (www.discoverdinarides.com) WWF urges the region and the world to discover the “undiscovered world of Dinarides.” The largest canyon in the world after the canyon of the Colorado River; the oldest and largest rainforest in Europe; meadows with more orchid species than there are in the whole UK; the largest and longest gorge in Europe ... all this is hiding in the Dinaric Arc region! Inspired by all these amazing facts, the creative agency Leo Burnett in Croatia designed a media campaign to promote the brand “Parks Dinarides” which can be seen from April in numerous newspapers, internet portals and on many TV stations throughout the region. www.discoverdinarides.com Energy Strategy for the “The current energy strategy for the Balkans is not in line with European Western Balkans environmental standards” (Jelko Kacin, EP MP) In February, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the European Parliament (AFET) held a public debate on the energy strategy of the European Energy Community for the countries of the western Balkans, chaired by MP Jelko Kacin.
  • Internet Address: Press Release . Communiqué De Presse (Exclusively for the Use of the Media. Not An

    Internet Address: Press Release . Communiqué De Presse (Exclusively for the Use of the Media. Not An

    Press Release . Communiqué de presse (Exclusively for the use of the media. Not an official document) United Nations TRIAL CHAMBER Nations Unies CHAMBRE DE 1ERE INSTANCE The Hague, 1 September 2004 KR/ P.I.S./888-e International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia JUDGEMENT IN THE CASE THE PROSECUTOR V. RADOSLAV BRDJANIN Tribunal Pénal International pour RADOSLAV BRDJANIN SENTENCED TO 32 YEARS’ IMPRISONMENT l’ex-Yougoslavie Please find below the summary of the Judgement delivered by Trial Chamber II, composed of Judges Agius (Presiding), Janů and Taya, as read out by the Presiding Judge. I. Introduction Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia is sitting today to deliver its Judgement in the trial of Radoslav Brdjanin. The Accused was charged with genocide, complicity in genocide, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, violations of the laws and customs of war and crimes against humanity, committed in 13 municipalities in the Bosnian Krajina between 1 April 1992 and 31 December 1992. The area relevant to the Indictment includes the municipalities of Banja Luka, Bosanska Krupa, Bosanski Novi, Bosanski Petrovac, Celinac, Donji Vakuf, Kljuc, Kotor Varoc, Prijedor, Prnjavor, Sanski Most, Sipovo and Teslic. The Accused stood trial for the following 12 charges: Genocide (Count 1) and complicity in genocide (Count 2): namely for having participated in a campaign designed to destroy Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats, in whole or in part, as national, ethnical, racial or religious groups, as
  • Microsoft Powerpoint

    Microsoft Powerpoint

    Workshop on WATER-FOOD-ENERGY-ECOSYSTEMS NEXUS ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN Sectoral goals in the Sava River Basin B&H : Strategic orientation in energy sector Zagreb, 4.3.’14. Prof. Tarik Kupusović Ph.D. C.E. Key Questions Increased demand 1. Can 9 billion people be 50% by 2030 (IEA) fed equitably, healthily Energy and sustainably? 2. Can we cope with the Climate future demands on Change water? Food Water 3. Can we provide enough Increased demand Increased demand energy to supply the 50% by 2030 30% by 2030 growing population (FAO) (IFPRI) coming out of poverty? 4. Can we mitigate and adapt to climate change? Biodiversity 5. Can we do all this in the context of redressing the The Perfect Storm? decline in biodiversity and preserving ecosystems? USA EPA, 2012 Could the warming be natural? Global temperatures are on the rise. Source: Knutti & Sedlacek (2012) 6 Produce more fuel-efficient vehicles Reduce vehicle use Improve energy-efficiency in buildings Develop carbon capture and storage processes Triple nuclear power Increase solar power Decrease deforestation/plant forests Improve soil carbon management strategies (USA Strategy) Content Introduction Hydropower potential in B&H Climate change and water demand Measures of adaptation Environmental Flow sub-law Construction of hydropower plants in B&H Advantages of hydropower over the other sources Conclusion Introduction total surface area of 51,197 km² seven river basins (75.5% belong to the Black Sea ,24.3 % to the Adriatic Sea catchment) average annual precipitation
  • Why Do You Oppose Bih's Accession?

    Why Do You Oppose Bih's Accession?

    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Public Opinion on Foreign Influence and Violent Extremism March 7, 2019 – March 26, 2019 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in Survey Research by Ipsos Bosnia and Herzegovina. • Data was collected between March 7 and 26, 2019, through in-home, in-person interviews using the CAPI (Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing) method. • A total of 2,190 interviews were completed with an overall margin of error of +/- 2.1% at the midrange of the 95-percent confidence level for the full sample. • A nationally representative sample was based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, with a random selection of households and respondents within each Primary Sampling Unit (PSU). The first level was the region and the second level was urbanity. • Using data from the 2013 census as statistical reference for sample design, the sample is made up of citizens of BiH, aged 18+. • Sampling frame: address registry within strata defined by region and type of settlements (urban and rural). • Targeted oversampling was conducted in four areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina that have been identified as susceptible to radical tendencies: Zenica-Doboj Canton (n=148), Una-Sana Canton (n=188), Herzegovina-Neretva Canton (n=206) and Republika Srpska East (n=102). Oversampling in these areas sought to yield more specific insights into the public’s perception of the role of religion in society, the presence of extremism, and interethnic tension, among others. • Households were selected by a random route technique. • Respondent selection was made using random selection, any member of a household with the same probability (SRSWoR).
  • Project Document

    Project Document

    United Nations Development Programme Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina PROJECT DOCUMENT Project Title: Technology transfer for climate resilient flood management in Vrbas River Basin Project Title: Technology transfer for climate resilient flood management in Vrbas River Basin UNDAF Outcome(s): Outcome 5: By 2019 legal and strategic frameworks are enhanced and operationalized to UNDAF Outcome(s): Outcome 5: By 2019 legal and strategic frameworks are enhanced and operationalized to ensure sustainable management of natural, cultural and energy resources. ensure sustainable management of natural, cultural and energy resources. UNDP Strategic Plan Primary Outcome: 1. Growth and development are inclusive and sustainable, incorporating UNDP Strategic Plan Primary Outcome: 1. Growth and development are inclusive and sustainable, incorporating productive capacities that create employment and livelihoods for the poor and excluded. UNDP Strategic Plan productive capacities that create employment and livelihoods for the poor and excluded. Output: 1.4 Scaled up action Output: 1.4 Scaled up action on climate change adaptation and mitigation across sectors which is funded and on climate change adaptation and mitigation across sectors which is funded and implemented implemented Expected CP Outcome(s): Expected CP Outcome(s): Outcome 5: By 2019 legal and strategic frameworks are enhanced and operationalized to ensure sustainable Outcome 5: By 2019 legal and strategic frameworks are enhanced and operationalized to ensure sustainable management of natural, cultural and energy resources. management of natural, cultural and energy resources. Expected CPD Output (s) Expected CPAP Output (s) Lead output: Output 5.2: Subnational actors implement climate change adaptation (CCA) and mitigation measures, Lead output: Output 5.2: Subnational actors implement climate change adaptation (CCA) and mitigation measures, sustainable energy access solutions, and manage natural resources sustainably.
  • Prosecution Final Trial Brief

    Prosecution Final Trial Brief

    IT-08-91-T 18146 D18146 - D17672 12 July 2012 SF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-08-91-T IN TRIAL CHAMBER 11 Before: Judge Burton Hall, Presiding Judge Guy Delvoie Judge Frederik Harhoff Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Date filed: 12 July 2012 PROSECUTOR v. Mico STANISIC Stojan ZUPLJANIN PUBLIC PROSECUTION'S NOTICE OF FILING A PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROSECUTION'S FINAL TRIAL BRIEF The Office of the Prosecutor: J oanna Korner Thomas Hannis Counsel for the Accused Slobodan Zecevic and Slobodan Cvijetic for Mico Stanisic Dragan Krgovic and Aleksandar Aleksic for Stojan Zupljanin IT-08-91-T 18145 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA Case No. IT-08-91-T THE PROSECUTOR v. Mico STANISIC & Stojan ZUPLJANIN PUBLIC PROSECUTION'S NOTICE OF FILING A PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION OF THE PROSECUTION'S FINAL TRIAL BRIEF 1. The Prosecution hereby files a public red acted version of the Prosecution's Final Trial Brief,l attached at Annex A, pursuant to the Trial Chamber's 4 June 2012 "Order on filing of public red acted versions on final trial briefs,,2. 2. The Prosecution has red acted information that identifies protected witnesses,3 information that was brought into the court in private or closed session and information that reveals the content of exhibits filed under seal. 3. The corrections to the Final Trial Brief contained in the recently filed Corrigendum4 have been included in the public red acted version of the Prosecution's Final Trial Brief. Word Count: 330 Tom Hannis Senior Trial Attorney Dated this 12th day of July 2012 At The Hague, The Netherlands 1 Prosecutor v.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Management Framework Public Disclosure Authorized Floods Emergency Recovery Project Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina September, 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized CONTROL SHEET Client: Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Water Management and Forestry Project: Floods Emergency Recovery Project (FERP) Bosnia and Herzegovina Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Title: Environmental Management Framework Status: Final Document Accounting Code: D-1172 Registry No.: UP-02-996/11 Project manager: Internal control: Director: Name and surname, Dr Irem Silajdžić, M.Sc Sanda Midžić Prof. dr. Tarik title B.Sc.Envtl.Eng. Kurtagić, Kupusović, B.Sc.C.E. B.Sc.C.E. DATE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE 15.08.2014 i GENERAL DATA Consultant: Hydro-Engineering Institute of Civil Engineering Faculty Sarajevo Stjepana Tomića 1 71000 Sarajevo tel: + 387 33 212 466/7 fax: + 387 33 207 949 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.heis.com.ba Project Dr Irem Silajdžić, M.SC. Environmental Technology, B.Sc. Environmental Engineering team: Melina Džajić Valjevac, M.Sc. Chemistry Vukašin Balta, M.Sc. Geology Admir Alađuz, B.Sc Biology Selma Osmanagić Klico, expert for environmental law ii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BAM – the currency code for Convertible Marka B&H – Bosnia and Herzegovina BP – Bank Procedure EA – Environmental Assessment EIA – Environmental Impact Assessment EIS – Environmental Impact Study EMF – Environmental Management Framework EMP – Environmental Management
  • Provenance of the Bosnian Flysch

    Provenance of the Bosnian Flysch

    1661-8726/08/01S031-24 Swiss J. Geosci. 101 (2008) Supplement 1, S31–S54 DOI 10.1007/s00015-008-1291-z Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2008 Provenance of the Bosnian Flysch TAMÁS MIKES 1, 7, *, DOMINIK CHRIST 1, 8, RÜDIGER PETRI 1, ISTVÁN DUNKL1, DIRK FREI 2, MÁRIA BÁLDI-BEKE 3, JOACHIM REITNER 4, KLAUS WEMMER 5, HAZIM HRVATOVIć 6 & HILMAR VON EYNAttEN 1 Key words: Dinarides, Adriatic plate, ophiolite, flysch, Cretaceous, provenance, geochronology, biostratigraphy, mineral chemistry ABSTRACT Sandwiched between the Adriatic Carbonate Platform and the Dinaride olitic thrust sheets and by redeposited elements of coeval Urgonian facies reefs Ophiolite Zone, the Bosnian Flysch forms a c. 3000 m thick, intensely folded grown on the thrust wedge complex. Following mid-Cretaceous deformation stack of Upper Jurassic to Cretaceous mixed carbonate and siliciclastic sedi- and thermal overprint of the Vranduk Formation, the depozone migrated fur- ments in the Dinarides. New petrographic, heavy mineral, zircon U/Pb and ther towards SW and received increasing amounts of redeposited carbonate fission-track data as well as biostratigraphic evidence allow us to reconstruct detritus released from the Adriatic Carbonate Platform margin (Ugar Forma- the palaeogeology of the source areas of the Bosnian Flysch basin in late Me- tion). Subordinate siliciclastic source components indicate changing source sozoic times. Middle Jurassic intraoceanic subduction of the Neotethys was rocks on the upper plate, with ophiolites becoming subordinate. The zone shortly followed by exhumation of the overriding oceanic plate. Trench sedi- of the continental basement previously affected by the Late Jurassic–Early mentation was controlled by a dual sediment supply from the sub-ophiolitic Cretaceous thermal imprint has been removed; instead, the basement mostly high-grade metamorphic soles and from the distal continental margin of the supplied detritus with a wide range of pre-Jurassic cooling ages.
  • ENCOURAGING DEMOCRATIC VALUES and ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP AMONG YOUTH 2016/17 Jasmin Hasić, National Director Maida Omerćehajić, P

    ENCOURAGING DEMOCRATIC VALUES and ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP AMONG YOUTH 2016/17 Jasmin Hasić, National Director Maida Omerćehajić, P

    ENCOURAGING DEMOCRATIC VALUES AND ACTIVE CITIZENSHIP AMONG YOUTH 2016/17 Jasmin Hasić, National Director Maida Omerćehajić, Project Coordinator This project is generously supported by the National ndo!ment "or Democracy and the Uni$ersity o" %araje$o %chool o" conomics and &usiness' >> PROJECT SUMMARY >> The year(long program seeks to train *+ aspiring young acti$ists, introducing them to democracy and human rights issues, encouraging them to employ critical thin)ing on sensiti$e topics, and building their communication, presentation, and research s)ills' The program includes a nine-day education and s)ills de$elopment training !ith a debate !or)shop, indi$idual research assignments on democracy(related issues, a group project resulting in "our ci$ic campaigns, a three-month period "or promoting the results o" the implemented ci$ic campaigns, and a closing ceremony with a final debate tournament' >> PARTICIPANTS >> The call "or applications !as open "rom October , until No$ember 6, -.16, !ith a total o" /6 recei$ed applications' The program was promoted through the follo!ing plat"orms: – Humanity in Action Bosnia and Her2ego$ina 3aceboo) page4 – ncouraging Democratic 5alues and 1cti$e Citi2enship among 6outh 3aceboo) page4 – $arious N7O and student web portals, Faceboo) pages and mailing lists4 – %tudent Fair organi2ed by Erasmus Student Net!or) (E%N) in Saraje$o4 – a public e$ent organi2ed to present the study and promotional $ideo about the "irst "our years o" the program' 1"ter care"ul re$ie! o" the applications, Humanity in 1ction &osnia and Her2ego$ina selected *+ participants coming "rom : di""erent cities and enrolled in *.
  • WBEC-REG-ENE-01 Final Report Author

    WBEC-REG-ENE-01 Final Report Author

    Code: WBEC-REG-ENE-01 REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE HYDROPOWER IN THE WESTERN BALKANS Final Report August 2018 IPA 2011-WBIF-Infrastructure Project Facility- Technical Assistance 3 EuropeAid/131160/C/SER/MULTI/3C This project is funded by the European Union Information Class: EU Standard formation Class: EU Standard The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mott MacDonald IPF Consortium and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. This r epor thas been prepared solely for use by the party which commissioned it (the ‘Client’) in connection with the captioned project. It should not be used for any other purpose. No person other than the Client or any party who has expressly agreed terms of r eliance with us ( the ‘Recipient(s)’) may r ely on the content, information or any views expressed in the report. We accept no duty of care, responsibility or liability to any other recipient of this document.