Police Transformation in Latin America by 2030

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Police Transformation in Latin America by 2030 REPORT BY THE PETER D. BELL RULE OF LAW PROGRAM AND THE INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK POLICE TRANSFORMATION IN LATIN AMERICA BY 2030 Kevin Casas, Paola González, and Liliana Mesías NOVEMBER 2018 This final report forms a part of the results of a joint project undertaken since 2017 by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), and the Inter-American Dialogue's Peter D. Bell Rule of Law Program. The views and recommendations contained herein are solely the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the consensus views of the board, staff, and members of the Inter-American Dialogue or any of its partners, donors, and/or supporting institutions. The Inter-American Dialogue is a non-partisan organization deeply committed to intellectual independence, transparency, and accountability. While donors are encouraged toparticipate in Dialogue activities, they do not influence our work in any way. Financial supporters have no control over the writing, methodology, analysis or findings of the Dialogue’s research efforts. First edition. Printed in Washington, DC. Photo: © Inter-American Development Bank. Layout: Tamar Ziff / Inter-American Dialogue. REPORT BY THE PETER D. BELL RULE OF LAW PROGRAM AND THE INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK POLICE TRANSFORMATION IN LATIN AMERICA BY 2030 Kevin Casas, Paola González and Liliana Mesías Kevin Casas is a senior fellow with the Inter-American Dialogue in Washington, D.C., and professor at LEAD University, Costa Rica Paola González is a research expert in the area of armed conflict and citizen security, and professor at Universidad Javeriana in Colombia Liliana Mesías is a research expert in violence, security and criminal policy in Colombia and Mexico for the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) The authors wish to thank Salomé Montero for her timely research assistance. NOVEMBER 2018 | NOVEMBER 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................................6 2. Latin American police today ............................................................................................................................7 2.1 What are the Latin American police of today like? ............................................................................8 2.2 What do police in Latin America do?............................................................................................. 10 2.3 Citizen perception of police performance .................................................................................... 12 3. Trends and dilemmas ......................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Organized crime and the militarization of interior security .................................................................15 3.2 Centralization vs descentralization .........................................................................................17 3.3 Community policing in Latin America ..................................................................................18 3.4 Processes of police incorporation, training and labor conditions .......................................19 3.5 The adoption of technology and information systems ...............................................................20 3.6 Police transparency and legitimacy for citizens ........................................................................21 4. Police reform in Latin America: Obstacles and opportunities ..................................................................................22 5. Where to now? ..............................................................................................................................................27 References.........................................................................................................................................................30 Police Transformation in Latin America by 2030 5 1 Introduction he pages ahead aim to outline the key characteristics mindset that social legitimacy is important for the police we believe will define the police in Latin America over to be able to carry out the tasks of crime prevention and Tthe next decade. To this end, we will first describe the control. current state of police institutions in the region and identify some of the key challenges they will face in the coming This reports presents the idea that what may happen years. Overcoming these challenges will be essential not over the coming years with police institutions in Latin only in order to more effectively control and prevent crime America—and their level of success at approaching but also to better adhere to the principles that must guide the ideal of becoming a police force that is effective police work in a democracy. Moreover, we will take stock of and imbued with democratic values—will depend on the lessons learned from the multiple experiences of police how they contend with six main challenges: organized reforms in Latin America over the last generation. crime and the militarization of internal security; the dilemma of centralizing or decentralizing police tasks; The advent of democracy, combined with the constant the professionalization of police forces; the adoption of pressure of high crime rates in the region, have led to an technology and information systems; the introduction adjustment process in police institutions marked in many of transparency and accountability practices; and finally, cases by a long history of authoritarianism. As we will the consolidation of community-oriented policing. The analyze later in this report, the results of this adjustment discussion over these challenges will play out in a context process have been quite limited in most cases. Despite defined nearly everywhere by high crime levels, political attempts at reform, most Latin American police conserve incentives contrary to long-term reforms, deeply rooted the rigid bureaucracy, lack of transparency and propensity authoritarian traditions, major organizational weaknesses for abuse of authority of times past. All of this occurs in a in police institutions and very low levels of public trust in new context defined by increasing demands from citizens them. and unprecedented threats—notably from organized crime—that lay bare the weaknesses of the police It is impossible to predict the outcome of the interaction institution and sometimes reinforce its worst traits. The among all these vectors in each country. What is very result is a police institution that nearly always falls short likely is that the complexity of the pending challenges in the fight against crime and that, with few exceptions, and the adverse surroundings in which they are addressed holds very little credibility in the eyes of citizens, which in will make any police transformations in the region rather turn hinders its efforts against crime. Somewhat unfairly, limited and fragmented. Democratic progress on some political authorities and citizens alike almost always blame fronts will happen alongside significant setbacks in others, the police for persistent problems of insecurity, which while all are subject to the immobilizing effect of powerful cannot be solved by even the police force alone. institutional inertia. Not all is negative. As unsatisfactory as the results of most This paper is comprised of five sections. Following this police reform efforts have been in the region, important introduction, we provide a brief description of Latin changes have been achieved. The most visible of these is American police forces in terms of size, political position, the demilitarization of the police’s role, which today with functions and level of social support. That section, which few exceptions forms part of the civil sphere of public offers a cursory overview of the situation, is followed by policy and is thus, at least in theory, guided by democratic an exploration of the six main challenges outlined in the principles. Preserving this fundamental change is, indeed, previous paragraph. This exploration attempts to identify one of the most important challenges going forward at a the dilemmas and some of the fundamental tasks posed time when the widespread presence of organized crime is by each on the path to more democratic police forces. generating strong pressure to legitimize a renewed military The fourth section will focus on the experiences of police role for the police in the internal security of countries. To reform implemented in Latin America in the recent past, in the demilitarization of the police, we can also add the broad an effort to distill some of the variables that have affected interest in experimenting with new forms of police-society the results; these factors will continue gravitating around relations, grouped under the umbrella—albeit an elastic any reform efforts undertaken in the coming years. Finally, one—of “community policing” practices. This has been an based on everything in the previous sections, the fifth will important transformation in the region’s police forces, and pinpoint the key trends that will interact to presumably while it has hardly ever managed to bring structural change define the state of the police forces in the region by 2030. to police institutions, it has nonetheless cemented the 6 Police Transformation in Latin America by 2030 | NOVEMBER 2018 These pages were written in full awareness that of the analysis are compensated for by the intentions
Recommended publications
  • Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights* of February 3, 2010
    Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights* of February 3, 2010 Provisional Measures Regarding Peru Matter of Ramírez-Hinostroza et al. HAVING SEEN: 1. The Order issued by the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter, the “Inter-American Court”, the “Court” or the “Tribunal”) of July 22, 2005 as well as the Orders issued by the Inter-American Court on September 21, 2005, February 7, 2006, July 4, 2006 and May 17, 2007. By means of the last Order, the Tribunal decided, inter alia: 1. To order the State to maintain the measures it might have adopted and to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to protect the life and personal integrity of Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza, his wife Susana Silvia Rivera-Prado, and his three daughters: Yolanda Susana Ramírez-Rivera, Karen Rose Ramírez-Rivera and Lucero Consuelo Ramírez- Rivera, granted by Order of September 21, 2005. 2. To extend the scope of the measures and to order the State to adopt, forthwith, such measures as may be necessary to protect the life and personal integrity of Messrs. Raúl Ángel Ramos De la Torre and Cesar Manuel Saldaña-Ramírez, Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza’s counsels. 2. The briefs of July 6 and October 17, 2007, May 2 and December 19, 2008 and February 9 and 17, March 31, May 20 and August 24, 2009, as well as other additional briefs, by means of which the Republic of Peru (hereinafter, the “State” or “Peru”) informed on: a) the protective measures adopted in relation to the beneficiaries; b) the investigation into the facts that gave rise to the adoption of the provisional measures, and c) the investigations conducted against Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2390.Book
    Treaty Series Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 2390 2006 Annexes A, C Recueil des Traités Traités et accords internationaux enregistrés ou classés et inscrits au répertoire au Secrétariat de l’Organisation des Nations Unies UNITED NATIONS • NATIONS UNIES Treaty Series Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations VOLUME 2390 Recueil des Traités Traités et accords internationaux enregistrés ou classés et inscrits au répertoire au Secrétariat de l’Organisation des Nations Unies United Nations • Nations Unies New York, 2010 Copyright © United Nations 2010 All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Copyright © Nations Unies 2010 tous droits réservés Imprimé aux États-Unis d’Amérique Volume 2390, Table of Contents Table of Contents ANNEX A Ratifications, accessions, subsequent agreements, etc., concerning treaties and international agreements registered in October 2006 with the Secretariat of the United Nations 4789. Multilateral: Agreement concerning the Adoption of Uniform Technical Prescriptions for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be fitted and/or be used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of These Prescriptions. Geneva, 20 March 1958 Succession: Montenegro ............................................................................... 3 Regulation No. 1. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicle headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam and/or a driving beam and equipped with filament lamps of category R2 and/or HS1. 8 August 1960 Succession: Montenegro........................................................................ 4 Regulation No. 2. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of incandescent electric lamps for headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing beam or a driving beam or both.
    [Show full text]
  • UNODC Ethiopia Annual Progress Report 2020
    2020 Annual Progress Report • 1 Contents Contents 2 Abbreviations 3 1. Summary and Context of the Action 4 1.1. Project Objective 4 1.2. Contextual Analysis 4 1.3. Key Partners 6 1.4. Results Snapshot: Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning 6 2. Summary of Achievements 7 3. Results achieved and activities undertaken 9 3.1. Criminal Justice and Integrity 10 3.2. Transnational Organised Crime 23 3.3. Transformation, Peace and Security 26 3.4. Violence against Women and Children 28 3.5. Youth Engagement 30 3.6. Certificates of Achievement 31 3.7. From crisis to recovery: UNODC Ethiopia joins the global Jerusalema Challenge 32 3.8. Donor Outreach 33 4. Challenges and Opportunities 33 5. Meet the Team 34 6. Acknowledgements 38 7. Donor Information 39 Annexes Annex 1: Programme Results 40 Annex 2: Unofficial Data Released Prisoners as part of COVID response 47 Annex 3: 2021 Training Schedule 49 2 • 2020 Annual Progress Report Abbreviations AACRRC Addis Ababa Children’s Rehabilitation and Remand Center BMM Better Migration Management FDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia FOAG Federal Office of the Attorney General GBV Gender Based Violence GIZ Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit ICTS Information and Communications Technology Systems IEC Information, Education and Communication IOM International Organisation for Migration MOP Ministry of Peace OHCHR Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights ROEA Regional Office for Eastern Africa SoM Smuggling of Migrants TiP Trafficking in Persons UNAIDS Joint United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime UNWomen United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women VAWG Violence Against Women and Girls VAC Violence Against Children VAWC Violence Against Women and Children 2020 Annual Progress Report • 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Force
    USE OF FORCE GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UN BASIC PRINCIPLES ON THE USE OF FORCE AND FIREARMS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS August 2015 Amnesty International Dutch Section Police and Human Rights Programme Amnesty International PO Box 1968 1000 BZ Amsterdam The Netherlands T (0031) (0)20-626 44 36 F (0031) (0)20-624 08 89 E [email protected] I www.amnesty.nl All rights reserved. This publication is copyright but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected]. Printed in the Netherlands ISBN 978-90-6463-368-3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS These Guidelines could not have been produced without the help of the many people who gave their time and expertisetoassistAmnestyInternationalinitspreparation. The main work was carried out by a project team of three people: Anja Bienert (drafting), Maggie Maloney and Sarah Masters (legal and equipment related input, editing and proof reading). Furthermore, Daniela Grosche carried out extensive research and established an impressive database of examples from various countries. Liana Rodrigues did an amazing amount of work in carrying out additional research, checking upon the validity of documents, and proof reading. Carline Westervelt supported the team in the most valuable manner in orga- nizationalandothermatters.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing the Pandemic
    Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union Policing the Pandemic Authors: Liz Aston, José A. Brandariz, Dorota Czerwinska, Sofie De Kimpe, Jacques de Maillard, Istvan Hoffman, Megan O’Neil, Mike Rowe, Randi Solhjell. Overview and purpose This paper presents lessons learned from a quick review of the experience of policing the pandemic in European states. Reflecting on this experience, the paper presents lessons and recommendations for the policing of any future second wave or future pandemic. Background These are very difficult times for policing and the police. The COVID-19 virus caused a pandemic that demanded unprecedented measures in the field of medical and social order. "In this moment of rapid transition, the reproduction of order is in question, the management of risk is tenuous and the governance of security paramount." (Sheptycki, 2020, p.2) According to James Sheptycki, for the first time we can speak of a global policing event, though actual responses have tended to be national and to reinforce borders as a first line of defence against the virus. In response to the current COVID- 19 public health crisis, European states have introduced measures to close workplaces, to limit the movement of people and to require or encourage social distancing. The ways in which these measures have been formulated and enforced vary from one country to the next and, in many cases, from one town to another. Within this varied picture, we note an increased use of police authority to stop persons, to check their identity and, where appropriate, to search their person, as this is probably the most used police measure to enforce the requested social distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union
    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT 1 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 © United Nations, 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any written output that uses this publication as a source at [email protected]. DISCLAIMERS This report was not formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, nor do they imply any endorsement. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issuance. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This document was produced with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect
    [Show full text]
  • Public Statement
    www.amnesty.org AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL – PUBLIC STATEMENT 18 February 2021 AMR 53/3632/2021 VENEZUELA: IMPUNITY IN THE FACE OF LETHAL POLICY OF SOCIAL CONTROL Amnesty International received credible and consistent reports that alleged extrajudicial executions were committed between 6-9 January 2021, in La Vega parish, southwestern Caracas. There is still no official public information on the investigation into these events by the Attorney General’s Office or by the Office of the Ombudsman. Amnesty International investigated the reports of extrajudicial executions between 6-9 January 2021 in La Vega parish, Caracas, using open sources and its Crisis Evidence Lab, and concluded that, although the malicious intent on the part of the authorities could not be confirmed in every case, there are enough indications to conclude that the facts in question belong to a pattern of extrajudicial executions that have been condemned for years by international bodies and organizations and Venezuelan civil society. EVENTS BETWEEN 6 AND 9 JANUARY 2021 On 6 January 2021, an alleged clash between armed gangs and security forces in La Vega parish, Caracas, was made public. According to information published by the media, an alleged armed gang that responds to a leader nicknamed "El Coqui" tried to take control of the La Vega parish.1 These alleged clashes were not reported by police officials nor was their intervention known until 8 January, in the morning, when via different official social media accounts, they reported on the actions of the Special Action Forces (FAES) of the Bolivarian National Police (PNB), who were in the area.2 The information published by the PNB reports that 650 police officers, from various units, the FAES and the PNB's Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DIP) were deployed for the operation.3 Amnesty International verified nine videos filmed between 8 and 9 January showing police activity in the La Vega area.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Security Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean 363.1098 Report on the Security Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean
    Report on the Security Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean 363.1098 Report on the Security Sector in Latin America and the Caribbean. R425 / Coordinated by Lucia Dammert. Santiago, Chile: FLACSO, 2007. 204p. ISBN: 978-956-205-217-7 Security; Public Safety; Defence; Intelligence Services; Security Forces; Armed Services; Latin America Cover Design: Claudio Doñas Text editing: Paulina Matta Correction of proofs: Jaime Gabarró Layout: Sylvio Alarcón Translation: Katty Hutter Printing: ALFABETA ARTES GRÁFICAS Editorial coordination: Carolina Contreras All rights reserved. This publication cannot be reproduced, partially or completely, nor registered or sent through any kind of information recovery system by any means, including mechanical, photochemical, electronic, magnetic, electro-visual, photocopy, or by any other means, without prior written permission from the editors. First edition: August 2007 I.S.B.N.: 978-956-205-217-7 Intellectual property registration number 164281 © Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO-Chile, 2007 Av. Dag Hammarskjöld 3269, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile [email protected] www.flacso.cl FLACSO TEAM RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE REPORT ON THE SECURITY SECTOR Lucia Dammert Director of the Security and Citizenship Program Researchers: David Álvarez Patricia Arias Felipe Ajenjo Sebastián Briones Javiera Díaz Claudia Fuentes Felipe Ruz Felipe Salazar Liza Zúñiga ADVISORY COUNCIL Alejandro Álvarez (UNDP SURF LAC) Priscila Antunes (Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais – Brazil) Felipe
    [Show full text]
  • European Response to the Cases of Spain and Slovakia
    LUCANA M. ESTÉVEZ MENDOZA DALIBOR PAVOLKA JAROSLAV NIŽŇANSKÝ EUROPEAN RESPONSE TO TERRORISM THE CASES OF SPAIN AND SLOVAKIA Lucana M. Estévez Mendoza, Dalibor Pavolka, Jaroslav Nižňanský EUROPEAN RESPONSE TO TERRORISM: THE CASES OF SPAIN AND SLOVAKIA Bratislava 2006 MINISTERIO DE DEFENSA INSTITUTO ESPAÑOL DE ESTUDIOS ESTRATÉGICOS MINISTRY OF DEFENCE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC Th e authors wish to thank the following people for their help in preparing this book: Alberto Álvarez Marín, student of Community Law at the Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Balbino Espinel Martínez, senior offi cer cadet of the Guardia Civil, Daniel Sansó-Rubert Pascual, Secretary of the Seminar on Defence Studies at the University of Santiago de Compostela-CESEDEN, Elemír Nečej, senior research fellow at the Institute for Security and Defence Studies of the MoD of the Slovak Republic, Viktor Kovaľov, senior research fellow at the Institute for Security and Defence Studies of the MoD of the Slovak Republic. © Lucana M. Estévez Mendoza © Dalibor Pavolka © Jaroslav Nižňanský EUROPEAN RESPONSE TO TERRORISM: THE CASES OF SPAIN AND SLOVAKIA Edited by Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic, Communication Division Editor: Dalibor Pavolka Graphics editor: Jozef Krupka Book cover: Jozef Krupka Translation: Spanish to English: Jenny Dodman Slovak to English: Silvia Osuská * * * © Copyright 2006 - All Rights reserved - No parts of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without permission from authors. * * * Printed by: Ministry of Defence of the Slovak republic, Section of Polygraphic Services ISBN 80 – 88842 – 94 – 8 Ministry of Defence of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava 2006 Section of Security and Defence Studies 3 CONTENTS I.
    [Show full text]
  • European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin Special Conference Edition Nr 4
    Editors: Detlef Nogala Thomas Görgen 4 Nr. Edition Special Conference Justyna Jurczak Bence Mészáros Peter Neyroud Lucia G. País Barbora Vegrichtová EUROPEAN LAW ENFORCEMENT RESEARCH BULLETIN EDITION NR. 4 – SPECIAL CONFERENCE EUROPEAN LAW EUROPEAN LAW ENFORCEMENT RESEARCH BULLETIN Innovations in Law Enforcement – Implications for practice, education and civil society Editors: Detlef Nogala Thomas Görgen Justyna Jurczak Bence Mészáros Peter Neyroud Lucia G. País Barbora Vegrichtová EUROPEAN LAW ENFORCEMENT RESEARCH BULLETIN Special Conference Edition Nr. 4 Also published online: Current issues and the archive of previous Bulletins are available from the journal's homepage https://bulletin.cepol.europa.eu. (Continues from the previous title European Police Research and Science Bulletin) Editors for this Special Conference Edition: Dr. Detlef Nogala (CEPOL – European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training) Prof. Thomas Görgen (German Police University, Münster, Germany) Dr. Justyna Jurczak (Police Academy in Szczytno, Poland) Dr. Bence Mészáros (National University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary) Dr. Peter Neyroud (University of Cambridge, United Kingdom) Prof. Lucia G. País (Instituto Superior de Ciências Policiais e Segurança Interna, Lisbon, Portugal) Barbora Vegrichtová PhD (Czech Republic) Published by: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL) (Acting Executive Director: Dr. h.c Detlef Schröder) Readers are invited to send any comments to the journal’s editorial mailbox: [email protected] For guidance on how to publish in the European Police Science and Research Bulletin: https://bulletin.cepol.europa.eu/index.php/bulletin/information/authors Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the articles and contributions in the European Law Enforcement Research Bulletin shall be taken by no means for those of the publisher, the editors or the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Arcón© Method
    Introduction to the Arcón© Method Canine Catastrophe Rescue consists of using dogs to find people that have been accidentally buried for whatever reason (explosions, earthquakes, structural flaws, hurricanes, tornadoes, avalanches, landslides, etc.). Arcón is a system to train and intervene in catastrophes with canine rescue teams. It was created by Jaime Parejo after twelve years of study and research. The method was deemed finished in October 1994, and he chose the name Arcón in honour of his pet and pioneering student. The Arcón Method’s proven success in rescue operations has led it to win numerous major official awards both nationally and internationally, such as the First Prize for Research granted by the Spanish Royal Canine Society and the Sasakawa Certificate of Distinction from the United Nations. The first canine rescue unit that Jaime Parejo officially assembled using this system was for the firefighters of Seville (Spain) back in 1996, where he is currently chief of this unit. Since then, official guides, instructors and rescue dogs have been trained and certified for important firefighting squads and police corps in a number of countries where there is a heightened risk of disasters (Colombia, El Salvador, Ecuador, Chile…). The Arcón Method is primarily based on a set of seven innovative behavioural techniques which complement each other and have an effective impact on three fundamental, interrelated parameters in search operations: autonomy, motivation and concentration. The moulding processes (reinforcement of successive approximations to the desired response) that characterise traditional canine search training methods and which are still currently used, are excessively limited to basic or primary learning processes (classical conditioning, operant conditioning, avoidance, extinction, generalisation, discrimination, cognitive perspectives, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a IRB-Approved Consent Form
    Appendix A IRB-Approved Consent Form John Jay College Principal Investigators: Haberfeld, Grant & King Consent Form This study will help us to better understand the relationship between terrorism and community support. Please remember that you are not required to participate in this research study. It is voluntary and you may choose to quit participating if you begin to feel upset or uncomfortable. The information provided by you will help the research team gain a better under- standing of the problem but will not be disseminated in any way that will directly identify you as a respondent. Your answers will be always kept strictly anonymous. Your identity will be strictly confidential and kept as such by the research team. Please read the attached information sheet before completing this form and consenting to participate in our study. ________ I have read and understood the above information about the study. ________ I have volunteered to participate in this project. ________ I have been informed of the basic procedures of the study by the researchers, and by reading the information sheet (of which I have been given a copy for my records). ________ I understand that by agreeing to participate in this study, I will be asked to complete some questionnaires and review my file. ________ I understand that I may choose to quit my participation at any time with no penalty. ________ I understand that any information that I give out for the purpose of this study will be kept confidential. Thank you for agreeing to participate in this study. Printed Name of Participant: _____________________________________ Signature of Participant: _____________________________________ Date: _____________________________________ Printed Name of Researcher: _____________________________________ Signature of researcher: _____________________________________ Date: _____________________________________ M.R.
    [Show full text]