RI-NU Project Description (As of 7/27/2021)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Addressing Fecal Sludge Management in Rural Locations | Cambodia | Ideglobal.Org | Page 1
Addressing Fecal Sludge Management in Rural Locations | Cambodia | ideglobal.org | Page 1 TACTIC REPORT Addressing Fecal Sludge Management in Rural Locations Pit latrines have become the solution for rural sanitation in many of the world’s poorest, remote, and difficult to access locations. At some point in time, the pit fills. What can households in these areas do to safely manage their sanitation needs? Context As sanitation coverage increases across the globe, fecal sludge management (FSM) is becoming increasingly important as the next sanitation issue that needs to be addressed. Most FSM solutions are designed for urban environments and involve collection (by vacuum truck or manual emptying) and mass treatment (e.g., ponds, aerobic digesters). For rural communities and households in Cambodia, these solutions present both economic and logistical challenges. Households in some areas have been able to manage their pit emptying issues with the service of pump trucks that come directly to the household. However, these solutions are still relatively expensive, are sometimes unable to navigate rural roads, and many hand-made varieties of these trucks lack the ability to hygienically remove and transport waste. As motor-powered pumps are Addressing Fecal Sludge Management in Rural Locations | Cambodia | ideglobal.org | Page 2 becoming cheaper, households are increasingly opting to use these over manual emptying with buckets. Yet despite increasing availability of pumps and trucks, waste disposal is rarely handled safely. In rural areas, the cost of constructing and maintaining a safe, hygienic treatment collection plant is prohibitive. The economies of scale that enable mass waste treatment plants to operate sustainably in urban areas are simply not available in rural villages. -
Vacuum Truck Standard Work Practice 1 Document
VACUUM TRUCK STANDARD WORK PRACTICE DOCUMENT INFORMATION Description Provides guidance for the safe operation and maintenance of Vac Truck equipment and describes methods for eliminating or reducing hazards and risks associated with vacuuming operations. Revision 2 Effective Date: September 24, 2018 Originator: Floyd Keller, Director EHS Approval: Dean Wallace, CEO TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE……………………………………………………………………………………..... 2 SCOPE…………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 RESPONSIBILITIES………….…………………………………………………………………. 2 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT……………………………………………………. 2 PRE-OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES………………………………………………………. 3 OPERATING PROCEDURES………………………………………………………………… 4 HOSES AND CONTAINMENT…………………………………………………………………. 7 BONDING, GROUNDING AND VENTING……………………………………………………. 8 LIQUID VACUUM TRUCK SAFETY PROCEDURES……………………………………….. 9 MATERIAL CHARACTERISTICS AND HAZARDS………………………………………….. 9 LOADING AND OFF-LOADING SITE PREPARATION AND CONDITIONS……………... 9 VACUUM TRUCK OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS………………………………………….. 9 PORTABLE RAMP OFF-LOADING SAFETY PROCEDURES…………………………….. 10 COLLECTOR TANK OFF-LOADING………………………………………………………….. 10 WASH-OUT PROCEDURES……………………………………………………………………. 10 DOCUMENTATION………………………………………………………………………………. 11 CONTINUITY TESTING…………………………………………………………………………. 11 NATURE OF VACUUM TRUCK INJURIES…………………………………………………… 11 TRAINING…………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 1 VACUUM TRUCK STANDARD WORK PRACTICE 1. PURPOSE 1.1. To establish a procedure for safe operation of industrial vacuum loading equipment including personal protective equipment standards, -
Evaluation of Boiler Chemical Cleaning Techniques
INFO—0444 Report Rap CA9400049 Atomic Energy Commission de contrfile Control Board de I'energie atomique INFO-0444 Atomic Energy Commission de controle 1*1 Control Board de I'energie atomique PO Box 1046 CP 1046 Onawa Canada Ottawa. Canada K1P5S9 K1P5S9 EVALUATION OF BOILER CHEMICAL CLEANING TECHNIQUES (AECB Project No. 2.221.1) by Monserco Limited A research report prepared for the Atomic Energy Control Board Ottawa, Canada April 1993 1 Canada Research report EVALUATION OF BOILER CHEMICAL CLEANING TECHNIQUES A report prepared by Monserco Limited under contract to the Atomic Energy Control Board. ABSTRACT Deposits in the secondary side of nuclear steam generators (SG) may cause corrosion and disruptions in steam flow. In the Bruce A reactors such deposits have resulted in the derating of two of the units. Hydrolasing has been successful in removing enough of the deposits to permit operation at 100% power, but a considerable amount of deposit remains in physically inaccessible regions of the generators. The only way to remove these deposits is through chemical cleaning. The EPRI/SGOG process, which has been selected by Ontario Hydro for use at the Bruce A station, is described. This process consists of alternating iron removal and copper removal steps, the two metals which comprise the bulk of the deposit in the Bruce A SGs. The iron removal solvent consists of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydrazine, ammonium hydroxide and a proprietary corrosion inhibitor CCI-801. The copper removal solvent consists of EDTA, ethylene diamine and hydrogen peroxide. Ontario Hydro proposes to dean a bank of four SGs in parallel employing a total of six copper removal steps and four iron removal steps. -
Table of Contents CHAPTER 31 VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (VPDES) PERMIT REGULATION....1 Part I Definitions and General Program Requirements
Project 1248 - Final STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD Amendment of Regulations Pertaining to Biosolids After Transfer from the Department of Health Table of Contents CHAPTER 31 VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (VPDES) PERMIT REGULATION....1 Part I Definitions and General Program Requirements ...........................................................................1 9VAC25-31-10. Definitions. ..................................................................................................................1 9VAC25-31-20. Purpose......................................................................................................................15 9VAC25-31-25. Applicability of incorporated references based on the dates that they became effective..............................................................................................................................................16 9VAC25-31-30. Federal effluent guidelines........................................................................................16 9VAC25-31-40. Exclusions. .................................................................................................................17 9VAC25-31-50. Prohibitions. ..............................................................................................................18 9VAC25-31-60. Effect of a permit.......................................................................................................19 9VAC25-31-70. Continuation of expiring permits...............................................................................20 -
Sanitation System – Emptying and Transporting Fecal Sludge Technical Brief
Technical Brief: Sanitation System – Emptying and Transporting Fecal Sludge Sanitation System User Excreta Emptying Use or Treatment Interface Storage and Disposal Transport Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 2 Service Provision ............................................................................................................... 3 3 Emptying Technologies ..................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Manual Emptying ........................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Mechanized Emptying ................................................................................................. 7 4 Transportation Methods .................................................................................................... 9 5 Relocating Latrines .......................................................................................................... 11 6 Risk Management ............................................................................................................. 12 7 Definitions ........................................................................................................................ 13 8 Additional Resources ...................................................................................................... 15 9 References....................................................................................................................... -
Trade Waste Information Sheet Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown
Trade Waste Information Sheet Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown Preface Liquid waste generated by industry, small business and commercial enterprises is referred to as trade waste. The Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 prohibits the unauthorised discharge of wastes, other than domestic sewage, into the sewerage system. 1. The definition of trade waste is; - The waterborne waste from business, trade or manufacturing property, other than: Waste that is a prohibited substance; or Human waste; or Stormwater. 2. The definition of Domestic waste is; - Faecal matter and urine of human origin and liquid wastes from sinks, baths, basins, showers and similar fixtures designed for personal hygiene in both residential and commercial properties. Cooling Towers Description of Activity The continuous blowdown, or “bleed off” and other wastewater from both commercial and industrial cooling towers is liquid trade waste. “Comfort and process air-conditioning cooling towers” are defined as cooling towers that are dedicated exclusively to (and are an integral part of) heating, ventilation, air-conditioning or refrigeration systems associated with commercial living space air-conditioning, or commercial process air-conditioning such as computer rooms. The discharge rate from cooling towers in this classification should not exceed 500 L/h. “Industrial Cooling Towers” are cooling towers used in manufacturing for rejecting heat extracted from a manufacturing process. This activity is classified as High Risk and an application must be forwarded to Whitsunday Regional Council. 11. Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown Version: 4 Page 1 of 8 Other Issues Commercial and industrial cooling towers generate wastewaters that vary considerably in the contaminants they may contain according to the water treatment utilised. -
Safe Operation of Vacuum Trucks in Petroleum Service
Safe Operation of Vacuum Trucks in Petroleum Service API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 2219 THIRD EDITION, NOVEMBER 2005 REAFFIRMED, NOVEMBER 2012 --``,,```,`,,,`,,`````,,,,``,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- Copyright American Petroleum Institute Provided by IHS under license with API Licensee=Shell Global Solutions International B.V. Main/5924979112, User=Elliott No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 12/30/2013 09:55:43 MST --``,,```,`,,,`,,`````,,,,``,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- Copyright American Petroleum Institute Provided by IHS under license with API Licensee=Shell Global Solutions International B.V. Main/5924979112, User=Elliott No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 12/30/2013 09:55:43 MST Safe Operation of Vacuum Trucks in Petroleum Service Downstream Segment API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 2219 THIRD EDITION, NOVEMBER 2005 REAFFIRMED, NOVEMBER 2012 --``,,```,`,,,`,,`````,,,,``,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- Copyright American Petroleum Institute Provided by IHS under license with API Licensee=Shell Global Solutions International B.V. Main/5924979112, User=Elliott No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 12/30/2013 09:55:43 MST SPECIAL NOTES API publications necessarily address problems of a general nature. With respect to particular circumstances, local, state, and federal laws and regulations should be reviewed. Neither API nor any of API's employees, subcontractors, consultants, committees, or other assignees make any warranty or representation, either express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained herein, or assume any liability or responsibility for any use, or the results of such use, of any information or process disclosed in this publication. Neither API nor any of API's employees, subcontractors, con- sultants, or other assignees represent that use of this publication would not infringe upon pri- vately owned rights. -
Boilers Released 12 December 2017 Trade Waste Discharges from Companies with Boilers Can Harm the Sewerage System
Boilers Released 12 December 2017 Trade waste discharges from companies with boilers can harm the sewerage system. Proper management practices at each site are needed. This guideline outlines the areas of concern and available technologies for the control of these trade wastes. Key trade waste quality requirements Parameter Generally accepted level pH Between 6-12 units Temperature ≤38 degrees C Total Dissolved Solids ≤3500 mg/L Flow rate to sewer Dependant on capacity of receiving sewer Note: Discharge limits may be varied under certain circumstances for individual dischargers. Typical pre-treatment Live or flash steam must never be discharged directly to sewer. Steam boiler or hot water boiler blowdown is cooled below 38 degrees C via a suitably sized blowdown pit or above ground cooling vessel, discharging to sewer via a gully trap. These must have enough retained water volume at ambient temperature to mix with and cool the incoming blowdown. Australian Standard AS3892 - 2001 has more information about blowdown tank design. Heat exchange systems fed from a flash steam vessel can reduce blowdown temperature to an acceptable level. These provide an opportunity for recycling waste heat back to the system. Accumulated solids captured in blowdown equipment are removed as needed for off-site disposal. Boiler water treatment chemicals are stored in bunds, to prevent leaks and spills from reaching the sewerage system. In-ground blowdown pits are covered and finished above ground level to prevent surface or stormwater entry. More information Mains Water Backflow Protection (AS/NZS 3500.1:2015) Backflow Prevention Requirements - Office of the Technical Regulator Bunding and Blind Tanks Guideline . -
Rockford Board of Education Invitation for Bid on Supplies, Materials, Equipment Or Services for School District No
ROCKFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION INVITATION FOR BID ON SUPPLIES, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 205 ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS IFB No. 16-44 Roosevelt Community Education Center Boiler Replacement DATE: March 21, 2016 OFFERS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL: 2:00 P.M. (CDST) on Tuesday, April 12, 2016 RE: IFB No. 16-44 Roosevelt Community Education Center Boiler Replacement. The purpose of this Invitation for Bid (IFB) is to solicit bids for all the mechanical and electrical work associate with the replacement of the boilers at Roosevelt Community Education Center, 978 Haskell Avenue, Rockford, IL 61103. IFB Opening: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., Rockford Board of Education, 6th floor Conference Room, 501 Seventh St., Rockford, IL 61104. If you plan to hand deliver your IFB submission on the due date, please note that you must check in on the 3rd floor prior to coming to the 6th floor. Please allow time for this as late submissions will not be accepted. Copies of the bidding documents are available from Onvia DemandStar, by email from the Purchasing Department, BHFX Digital Imaging and Printing, DG Digital Printing, YCS Printing, Inc., or by download from the District’s Purchasing Bids-RFPs webpage at www.rps205.com. A MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED ON, MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2016 AT 2:30 P.M. (CDST), AT ROOSEVELT COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, 978 HASKELL AVENUE, ROCKFORD, IL 61103 BY OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE. MEET IN THE LOBBY. Refer all questions relative to the business aspect, Instructions to Bidders, Special Conditions, and questions concerning the technical aspect of the documents to the Purchasing Process Manager by email at [email protected]. -
Blue River Biosolids Facility, Final Basis of Design Report
KC Water Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Facility BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FINAL | January 2020 This document is released to the City of Kansas City, Missouri and Shortlisted Respondents as part of the Request for Proposals Package issued January 24, 2020, Project No. 81000821 – Contract Number 1595. This report does not incorporate any modifications made by subsequent addenda since this report was initially issued to Shortlisted Respondents. KC Water Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Facility BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FINAL | January 2020 CERTIFICATION PAGE Project/Contract Number __081000821/1595______ Project Title _Blue River Biosolids Facility Project_______ I am responsible for the following sections of the Basis of Design Report: Structural (SEAL) 00005 Construction Certification Page 050113 Modified For WSD 072916 Contract Central BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT | BLUE RIVER WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT BIOSOLIDS FACILITY | KC WATER Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Purpose of Design Criteria Documents 1-1 1.1.1 Basis of Design Report Organization 1-1 1.2 Design Criteria for the Representative Project 1-2 1.2.1 Fixed Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.2 Indicative Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.3 Indicative-Preferred Design Criteria 1-2 1.3 Project Overview 1-2 Chapter 2: Performance Requirements 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Influent Flows and Loads 2-1 2.3 Process Modeling Conditions and Results 2-3 Chapter 3: Project Siting & Existing Facilities 3.1 Existing Site Conditions 3-1 3.1.1 Site Survey & Potholing Data 3-1 3.1.2 LIDAR Information -
On-Site Wastewater Treatment and Reuses in Japan
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Water Management 159 June 2006 Issue WM2 Pages 103–109 Linda S. Gaulke Paper 14257 PhD Candidate, Received 05/05/2005 University of Washington, Accepted 01/11/2005 Seattle, USA Keywords: sewage treatment & disposal/ water supply On-site wastewater treatment and reuses in Japan L. S. Gaulke MSE, MS On-site wastewater treatment poses a challenging toilets. Since then, sewers and johkasou have developed side problem for engineers. It requires a balance of appropriate by side. levels of technology and the operational complexity necessary to obtain high-quality effluent together with As of the year 2000, 71% of household wastewater in Japan adequate reliability and simplicity to accommodate was receiving some type of treatment and 91% of Japanese infrequent maintenance and monitoring. This review residents had flush toilets.1 A breakdown by population of covers how these issues have been addressed in on-site wastewater treatment methods utilised in Japan is presented in wastewater treatment in Japan (termed johkasou). On-site Fig. 1. The Johkasou Law mandates johkasou for new systems in Japan range from outmoded designs that construction in areas without sewers. Johkasou are different discharge grey water directly into the environment to from European septic tanks—even the smallest units advanced treatment units in high-density areas that (5–10 population equivalents (p.e.)) undergo an aerobic produce reclaimed water on-site. Japan is a world leader process. in membrane technologies that have led to the development of on-site wastewater treatment units capable of water-reclamation quality effluent. Alternative 1.1. -
UFC 3-240-13FN Industrial Water Treatment Operation And
UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity) AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location 1 Dec 2005 FOREWORD UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 FOREWORD \1\ The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the more stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. Headquarters, U.S.