DOCSLIB.ORG

Cip Project Development for Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cip Project Development for Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BIOSOLIDS MASTER PLAN TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 6: CIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FOR PLANT NO. 2 SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITIES OCSD PROJECT NO. PS15‐01 reserved. rights All 2015. Company Holding Veatch & Orange County Sanitation District ©Black 9 MAY 2017 In association with TM‐6: CIP Project Development for Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities | Orange County Sanitation District Table of Contents Acronym and Abbreviations List ......................................................................................................................x Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ ES‐1 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1‐1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Approach ................................................................................................................................................................... 1‐1 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 Summary of TM‐4 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.2 Summary of TM‐5 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.3 Geotechnical Evaluation of Proposed Facilities ........................................................................................ 2‐2 3.0 Process Requirements for Future Digestion and Pre‐Processed SSO Co‐Digestion Facilities ..................................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1 Solids Flows and Loads ....................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.2 Pre‐Processed SSO Loads ................................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.3 Design Criteria ........................................................................................................................................................ 3‐2 3.4 Process Performance ........................................................................................................................................... 3‐3 3.4.1 Digester Performance ............................................................................................................................ 3‐3 3.4.2 Digester Gas Production ....................................................................................................................... 3‐4 3.5 Process Heat Demand .......................................................................................................................................... 3‐6 4.0 Conceptual Design for Future Digestion and Pre‐Processed SSO Co‐Digestion Facilities ..................................................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1 Process Flow Diagram ......................................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.2 Process Design ........................................................................................................................................................ 4‐2 4.2.1 Thermophilic Digesters (110‐ft Diameter) ................................................................................... 4‐2 4.2.1.1 Description ........................................................................................................................................... 4‐2 4.2.1.2 Major Equipment List ...................................................................................................................... 4‐3 4.2.1.3 Facility Layout ..................................................................................................................................... 4‐3 4.2.2 Mesophilic Digesters (105‐ft Diameter) ......................................................................................... 4‐5 4.2.2.1 Description ........................................................................................................................................... 4‐5 4.2.2.2 Major Equipment List ...................................................................................................................... 4‐6 4.2.2.3 Facility Layout ..................................................................................................................................... 4‐6 4.2.3 Mesophilic Digesters (80‐ft Diameter) ........................................................................................... 4‐7 4.2.3.1 Description ........................................................................................................................................... 4‐7 4.2.3.2 Major Equipment List ...................................................................................................................... 4‐7 4.2.3.3 Facility Layout ..................................................................................................................................... 4‐8 4.2.4 Digested Sludge Holders (80‐ft Diameter) .................................................................................... 4‐9 4.2.4.1 Description ........................................................................................................................................... 4‐9 4.2.4.2 Major Equipment List ...................................................................................................................... 4‐9 4.2.4.3 Facility Layout ................................................................................................................................... 4‐10 4.2.5 Digester Feed Facility (DFF) .............................................................................................................. 4‐10 Final – May 9, 2017 ii Biosolids Master Plan Orange County Sanitation District | TM‐6: CIP Project Development for Plant No. 2 Solids Handling Facilities 4.2.5.1 Description ......................................................................................................................................... 4‐10 4.2.5.2 Major Equipment List .................................................................................................................... 4‐11 4.2.5.3 Facility Layout ................................................................................................................................... 4‐11 4.2.6 TPAD Class A Batch Tanks ................................................................................................................. 4‐12 4.2.6.1 Class A Batch Tank Evaluation and Justification ................................................................. 4‐13 4.2.6.2 Reactivation and Regrowth Potential with Class A ........................................................... 4‐15 4.2.6.3 Class A Batch Tank Number and Sizing .................................................................................. 4‐16 4.2.6.4 Description ......................................................................................................................................... 4‐17 4.2.6.5 Facility Process Flow Diagram ................................................................................................... 4‐17 4.2.6.6 Major Equipment List .................................................................................................................... 4‐18 4.2.6.7 Facility Layout ................................................................................................................................... 4‐19 4.2.7 TPAD Sludge Cooling ............................................................................................................................ 4‐19 4.2.7.1 Description ......................................................................................................................................... 4‐22 4.2.7.2 Major Equipment List .................................................................................................................... 4‐22 4.2.7.3 Facility Layout ................................................................................................................................... 4‐22 4.2.8 Interim Pre‐Processed SSO Receiving ........................................................................................... 4‐24 4.2.8.1 Description ......................................................................................................................................... 4‐24 4.2.8.2 Major Equipment List .................................................................................................................... 4‐26 4.2.8.3 Facility Layout ................................................................................................................................... 4‐27 4.2.9 Ultimate Pre‐Processed SSO Receiving ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Advanced Heat Pump Systems Using Urban Waste Heat “Sewage Heat”
    Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review Vol. 52 No. 4 (December 2015) 80 Advanced Heat Pump Systems Using Urban Waste Heat “Sewage Heat” YOSHIE TOGANO*1 KENJI UEDA*2 YASUSHI HASEGAWA*3 JUN MIYAMOTO*1 TORU YAMAGUCHI*4 SEIJI SHIBUTANI*5 The application of heat pumps for hot water supply and heating systems is expected. Through this, the energy consumption of hot water supply and heating, which account for a substantial proportion of the total energy consumption in a building, will be reduced. The level of reduction can be dramatically increased by use of "sewage heat," which is part of waste heat in an urban area. So far, however, it has been difficult to determine whether sufficient technical or basic data available to widely use sewage heat exists. Therefore, demonstrations on the evaluation method for the potential of sewage heat in an urban area and the actual- equipment scale of verification using untreated sewage were conducted to understand the characteristics of sewage heat, and major technologies for use of sewage heat were developed. The technologies were applied to the system using sewage heat, and the system achieved a 29% reduction in the annual energy consumption and a 69% reduction in the running cost in the hot water system in lodging facilities compared to the conventional system using a boiler. The depreciation timespan of the difference in the initial cost between the conventional system and the heat pump system is about four years, and this system has an economically large advantage. In this report, the results obtained through the development and the demonstrations are systematically organized and the technical information needed for introduction of use of sewage heat is provided.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    WATER GLOBAL PRACTICE QUALITY UNKNOWN BACKGROUND PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized Determinants of Public Disclosure Authorized Essayas Ayana Declining Water Quality Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized About the Water Global Practice Launched in 2014, the World Bank Group’s Water Global Practice brings together financing, knowledge, and implementation in one platform. By combining the Bank’s global knowledge with country investments, this model generates more firepower for transformational solutions to help countries grow sustainably. Please visit us at www.worldbank.org/water or follow us on Twitter at @WorldBankWater. About GWSP This publication received the support of the Global Water Security & Sanitation Partnership (GWSP). GWSP is a multidonor trust fund administered by the World Bank’s Water Global Practice and supported by Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Netherlands’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Switzerland’s State Secretariat for Economic Affairs, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, U.K. Department for International Development, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Please visit us at www.worldbank.org/gwsp or follow us on Twitter #gwsp. Determinants of Declining Water Quality Essayas Ayana © 2019 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Boiler Chemical Cleaning Techniques
    INFO—0444 Report Rap CA9400049 Atomic Energy Commission de contrfile Control Board de I'energie atomique INFO-0444 Atomic Energy Commission de controle 1*1 Control Board de I'energie atomique PO Box 1046 CP 1046 Onawa Canada Ottawa. Canada K1P5S9 K1P5S9 EVALUATION OF BOILER CHEMICAL CLEANING TECHNIQUES (AECB Project No. 2.221.1) by Monserco Limited A research report prepared for the Atomic Energy Control Board Ottawa, Canada April 1993 1 Canada Research report EVALUATION OF BOILER CHEMICAL CLEANING TECHNIQUES A report prepared by Monserco Limited under contract to the Atomic Energy Control Board. ABSTRACT Deposits in the secondary side of nuclear steam generators (SG) may cause corrosion and disruptions in steam flow. In the Bruce A reactors such deposits have resulted in the derating of two of the units. Hydrolasing has been successful in removing enough of the deposits to permit operation at 100% power, but a considerable amount of deposit remains in physically inaccessible regions of the generators. The only way to remove these deposits is through chemical cleaning. The EPRI/SGOG process, which has been selected by Ontario Hydro for use at the Bruce A station, is described. This process consists of alternating iron removal and copper removal steps, the two metals which comprise the bulk of the deposit in the Bruce A SGs. The iron removal solvent consists of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydrazine, ammonium hydroxide and a proprietary corrosion inhibitor CCI-801. The copper removal solvent consists of EDTA, ethylene diamine and hydrogen peroxide. Ontario Hydro proposes to dean a bank of four SGs in parallel employing a total of six copper removal steps and four iron removal steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents CHAPTER 31 VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (VPDES) PERMIT REGULATION....1 Part I Definitions and General Program Requirements
    Project 1248 - Final STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD Amendment of Regulations Pertaining to Biosolids After Transfer from the Department of Health Table of Contents CHAPTER 31 VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (VPDES) PERMIT REGULATION....1 Part I Definitions and General Program Requirements ...........................................................................1 9VAC25-31-10. Definitions. ..................................................................................................................1 9VAC25-31-20. Purpose......................................................................................................................15 9VAC25-31-25. Applicability of incorporated references based on the dates that they became effective..............................................................................................................................................16 9VAC25-31-30. Federal effluent guidelines........................................................................................16 9VAC25-31-40. Exclusions. .................................................................................................................17 9VAC25-31-50. Prohibitions. ..............................................................................................................18 9VAC25-31-60. Effect of a permit.......................................................................................................19 9VAC25-31-70. Continuation of expiring permits...............................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Systems Water Efficiency Management Guide
    Water Efficiency Management Guide Mechanical Systems EPA 832-F-17-016c November 2017 Mechanical Systems The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) WaterSense® program encourages property managers and owners to regularly input their buildings’ water use data in ENERGY STAR® Portfolio Manager®, an online tool for tracking energy and water consumption. Tracking water use is an important first step in managing and reducing property water use. WaterSense has worked with ENERGY STAR to develop the EPA Water Score for multifamily housing. This 0-100 score, based on an entire property’s water use relative to the average national water use of similar properties, will allow owners and managers to assess their properties’ water performance and complements the ENERGY STAR score for multifamily housing energy use. This series of Water Efficiency Management Guides was developed to help multifamily housing property owners and managers improve their water management, reduce property water use, and subsequently improve their EPA Water Score. However, many of the best practices in this guide can be used by facility managers for non-residential properties. More information about the Water Score and additional Water Efficiency Management Guides are available at www.epa.gov/watersense/commercial-buildings. Mechanical Systems Table of Contents Background.................................................................................................................................. 1 Single-Pass Cooling ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Desalination Using MEMS and Salinity-Gradient Solar Pond Technology
    Thermal Desalination using MEMS and Salinity-Gradient Solar Pond Technology University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, Texas Cooperative Agreement No. 98-FC-81-0047 Desalination Research and Development Program Report No. 80 August 2002 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Water Treatment Engineering and Research Group Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suit 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Report (0704-0188), Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED August 2002 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Thermal Desalination using MEMS and Salinity-Gradient Solar Pond Technology Agreement No. 98-FC-81-0047 6. AUTHOR(S) Huanmin Lu, John C. Walton, and Herbert Hein 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER University of Texas at El Paso El Paso, Texas 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING Bureau of Reclamation AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Desalination Research and Denver Federal Center Development Program Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Waste Information Sheet Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown
    Trade Waste Information Sheet Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown Preface Liquid waste generated by industry, small business and commercial enterprises is referred to as trade waste. The Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 prohibits the unauthorised discharge of wastes, other than domestic sewage, into the sewerage system. 1. The definition of trade waste is; - The waterborne waste from business, trade or manufacturing property, other than: Waste that is a prohibited substance; or Human waste; or Stormwater. 2. The definition of Domestic waste is; - Faecal matter and urine of human origin and liquid wastes from sinks, baths, basins, showers and similar fixtures designed for personal hygiene in both residential and commercial properties. Cooling Towers Description of Activity The continuous blowdown, or “bleed off” and other wastewater from both commercial and industrial cooling towers is liquid trade waste. “Comfort and process air-conditioning cooling towers” are defined as cooling towers that are dedicated exclusively to (and are an integral part of) heating, ventilation, air-conditioning or refrigeration systems associated with commercial living space air-conditioning, or commercial process air-conditioning such as computer rooms. The discharge rate from cooling towers in this classification should not exceed 500 L/h. “Industrial Cooling Towers” are cooling towers used in manufacturing for rejecting heat extracted from a manufacturing process. This activity is classified as High Risk and an application must be forwarded to Whitsunday Regional Council. 11. Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown Version: 4 Page 1 of 8 Other Issues Commercial and industrial cooling towers generate wastewaters that vary considerably in the contaminants they may contain according to the water treatment utilised.
    [Show full text]
  • Boilers Released 12 December 2017 Trade Waste Discharges from Companies with Boilers Can Harm the Sewerage System
    Boilers Released 12 December 2017 Trade waste discharges from companies with boilers can harm the sewerage system. Proper management practices at each site are needed. This guideline outlines the areas of concern and available technologies for the control of these trade wastes. Key trade waste quality requirements Parameter Generally accepted level pH Between 6-12 units Temperature ≤38 degrees C Total Dissolved Solids ≤3500 mg/L Flow rate to sewer Dependant on capacity of receiving sewer Note: Discharge limits may be varied under certain circumstances for individual dischargers. Typical pre-treatment Live or flash steam must never be discharged directly to sewer. Steam boiler or hot water boiler blowdown is cooled below 38 degrees C via a suitably sized blowdown pit or above ground cooling vessel, discharging to sewer via a gully trap. These must have enough retained water volume at ambient temperature to mix with and cool the incoming blowdown. Australian Standard AS3892 - 2001 has more information about blowdown tank design. Heat exchange systems fed from a flash steam vessel can reduce blowdown temperature to an acceptable level. These provide an opportunity for recycling waste heat back to the system. Accumulated solids captured in blowdown equipment are removed as needed for off-site disposal. Boiler water treatment chemicals are stored in bunds, to prevent leaks and spills from reaching the sewerage system. In-ground blowdown pits are covered and finished above ground level to prevent surface or stormwater entry. More information Mains Water Backflow Protection (AS/NZS 3500.1:2015) Backflow Prevention Requirements - Office of the Technical Regulator Bunding and Blind Tanks Guideline .
    [Show full text]
  • Rockford Board of Education Invitation for Bid on Supplies, Materials, Equipment Or Services for School District No
    ROCKFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION INVITATION FOR BID ON SUPPLIES, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 205 ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS IFB No. 16-44 Roosevelt Community Education Center Boiler Replacement DATE: March 21, 2016 OFFERS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL: 2:00 P.M. (CDST) on Tuesday, April 12, 2016 RE: IFB No. 16-44 Roosevelt Community Education Center Boiler Replacement. The purpose of this Invitation for Bid (IFB) is to solicit bids for all the mechanical and electrical work associate with the replacement of the boilers at Roosevelt Community Education Center, 978 Haskell Avenue, Rockford, IL 61103. IFB Opening: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., Rockford Board of Education, 6th floor Conference Room, 501 Seventh St., Rockford, IL 61104. If you plan to hand deliver your IFB submission on the due date, please note that you must check in on the 3rd floor prior to coming to the 6th floor. Please allow time for this as late submissions will not be accepted. Copies of the bidding documents are available from Onvia DemandStar, by email from the Purchasing Department, BHFX Digital Imaging and Printing, DG Digital Printing, YCS Printing, Inc., or by download from the District’s Purchasing Bids-RFPs webpage at www.rps205.com. A MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED ON, MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2016 AT 2:30 P.M. (CDST), AT ROOSEVELT COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, 978 HASKELL AVENUE, ROCKFORD, IL 61103 BY OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE. MEET IN THE LOBBY. Refer all questions relative to the business aspect, Instructions to Bidders, Special Conditions, and questions concerning the technical aspect of the documents to the Purchasing Process Manager by email at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Blue River Biosolids Facility, Final Basis of Design Report
    KC Water Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Facility BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FINAL | January 2020 This document is released to the City of Kansas City, Missouri and Shortlisted Respondents as part of the Request for Proposals Package issued January 24, 2020, Project No. 81000821 – Contract Number 1595. This report does not incorporate any modifications made by subsequent addenda since this report was initially issued to Shortlisted Respondents. KC Water Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Facility BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FINAL | January 2020 CERTIFICATION PAGE Project/Contract Number __081000821/1595______ Project Title _Blue River Biosolids Facility Project_______ I am responsible for the following sections of the Basis of Design Report: Structural (SEAL) 00005 Construction Certification Page 050113 Modified For WSD 072916 Contract Central BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT | BLUE RIVER WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT BIOSOLIDS FACILITY | KC WATER Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Purpose of Design Criteria Documents 1-1 1.1.1 Basis of Design Report Organization 1-1 1.2 Design Criteria for the Representative Project 1-2 1.2.1 Fixed Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.2 Indicative Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.3 Indicative-Preferred Design Criteria 1-2 1.3 Project Overview 1-2 Chapter 2: Performance Requirements 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Influent Flows and Loads 2-1 2.3 Process Modeling Conditions and Results 2-3 Chapter 3: Project Siting & Existing Facilities 3.1 Existing Site Conditions 3-1 3.1.1 Site Survey & Potholing Data 3-1 3.1.2 LIDAR Information
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis and Optimization of Open Circulating Cooling Water System
    water Article Analysis and Optimization of Open Circulating Cooling Water System Ziqiang Lv 1,2,3, Jiuju Cai 2, Wenqiang Sun 1,2,* and Lianyong Wang 1,2 1 Department of Thermal Engineering, School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, China; [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (L.W.) 2 State Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, China; [email protected] 3 School of Civil Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, Liaoning, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 22 September 2018; Accepted: 26 October 2018; Published: 7 November 2018 Abstract: Open circulating cooling water system is widely used in process industry. For a system with a fixed structure, the water consumption and blowdown usually change with the varying parameters such as quality and temperature. With the purpose of water saving, it is very important to optimize the operation strategy of water systems. Considering the factors including evaporation, leakage, blowdown and heat transfer, the mass and energy conservation equations of water system are established. On this basis, the quality and temperature models of makeup and blowdown water are, respectively, developed. The water consumption and discharge profiles and the optimal operating strategy of the open recirculating cooling water system under different conditions are obtained. The concept of cycles of temperature is proposed to evaluate the temperature relationship of various parts of the open circulating cooling water system. A mathematical relationship is established to analyze the influence of the water temperature on the makeup water rate of the system under the condition of insufficient cooling capacity of the cooling tower.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming Resources: Reducing Water Consumption Through Reuse
    Reclaiming Resources: Reducing Water Consumption through Reuse Although water reuse can be energy-intensive, its use is increasing across numerous industries By: Al Goodman Al Goodman is a principal with 42 years of experience serving clients in water reuse projects at the Louisville, Ky., office of CDM Smith (Boston). Communities and industries around the world are turning to water reuse. The drivers are varied: the need to augment strained water supplies, reduce nutrients in treated effluent, maintain ecological balance, use the most energy-efficient water sources, and reduce cost of purchased and treated water. The major driver is water scarcity in arid and semi-arid regions, though some regions of the world that are not considered to be water-scarce are implementing water reuse. Ecological drivers are becoming more important in evaluating reuse as part of a response to rigorous and costly requirements to reduce or remove nutrients (mainly nitrogen and phosphorus) from discharges to surface waters. Though water reuse can be energy-intensive, depending on the level of treatment required, only a full life-cycle analysis can reveal whether overall resource costs are greater than or less than alternative water supplies. Municipalities are implementing various types of urban water reuse and turning to industry and agriculture as potential customers of reclaimed water. Categories of water reuse applications are presented in the table. This article focuses on considerations relevant for municipal and industrial reuse. For more information on the full range of categories of reuse, refer to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Guidelines for Water Reuse (2012; http://nepis.epa.gov/Adobe/ PDF/P100FS7K.pdf).
    [Show full text]