STEAM BOILERS (Steam Generating Systems) Steam, Heating Hot Water, and Outside Distribution Systems Design Manual August 1, 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Development and Application of Optimal Design Capability for Coal Gasification Systems
DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF OPTIMAL DESIGN CAPABILITY FOR COAL GASIFICATION SYSTEMS Technical Documentation: Oxygen-based Combustion Systems (Oxyfuels) with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Final Report of Work Performed Under Contract No.: DE-AC21-92MC29094 Reporting Period Start, October 2003 Reporting Period End, May 2007 Report Submitted, May 2007 to U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory 626 Cochrans Mill Road, P.O. Box 10940 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236-0940 by Edward S. Rubin (P.I.) Anand B. Rao Michael B. Berkenpas Carnegie Mellon University Center for Energy and Environmental Studies Department of Engineering and Public Policy Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 Contents Objective 1 Literature Review 2 Process Overview ......................................................................................................................2 History .......................................................................................................................................4 Advantages ................................................................................................................................5 Issues and Challenges................................................................................................................6 Performance Model 8 Model Configurations................................................................................................................8 Default Configuration................................................................................................................9 -
Evaluation of Boiler Chemical Cleaning Techniques
INFO—0444 Report Rap CA9400049 Atomic Energy Commission de contrfile Control Board de I'energie atomique INFO-0444 Atomic Energy Commission de controle 1*1 Control Board de I'energie atomique PO Box 1046 CP 1046 Onawa Canada Ottawa. Canada K1P5S9 K1P5S9 EVALUATION OF BOILER CHEMICAL CLEANING TECHNIQUES (AECB Project No. 2.221.1) by Monserco Limited A research report prepared for the Atomic Energy Control Board Ottawa, Canada April 1993 1 Canada Research report EVALUATION OF BOILER CHEMICAL CLEANING TECHNIQUES A report prepared by Monserco Limited under contract to the Atomic Energy Control Board. ABSTRACT Deposits in the secondary side of nuclear steam generators (SG) may cause corrosion and disruptions in steam flow. In the Bruce A reactors such deposits have resulted in the derating of two of the units. Hydrolasing has been successful in removing enough of the deposits to permit operation at 100% power, but a considerable amount of deposit remains in physically inaccessible regions of the generators. The only way to remove these deposits is through chemical cleaning. The EPRI/SGOG process, which has been selected by Ontario Hydro for use at the Bruce A station, is described. This process consists of alternating iron removal and copper removal steps, the two metals which comprise the bulk of the deposit in the Bruce A SGs. The iron removal solvent consists of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydrazine, ammonium hydroxide and a proprietary corrosion inhibitor CCI-801. The copper removal solvent consists of EDTA, ethylene diamine and hydrogen peroxide. Ontario Hydro proposes to dean a bank of four SGs in parallel employing a total of six copper removal steps and four iron removal steps. -
Impact of Fuel Variability and Operating Parameters on Biomass Boiler Performance
Impact of Fuel Variability and Operating Parameters on Biomass Boiler Performance by Nazanin Abbas Nejad Orang A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy Chemical Engineering and Applied Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Nazanin Abbas Nejad Orang 2019 Impact of Fuel Variability and Operating Parameters on Biomass Boiler Performance Nazanin Abbas Nejad Orang Doctor of Philosophy Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry University of Toronto 2019 Abstract Biomass boilers provide up to one-third of the energy requirement in pulp and paper mills by burning hog fuel, which is a mixture of wood-waste available at the mill site. The quality of this fuel varies significantly depending on its source and storage conditions. This fuel variability often causes biomass boiler operation to be unstable and unpredictable. This study consists of two parts: the first part investigates the impact of fuel variability on combustion and develops means for mitigating these impacts to achieve stable boiler operation. The second part identifies the most influential parameter in boiler operation using multivariate analysis, and develops a predictive statistical model for optimization of biomass boiler thermal performance. In the first part, wood species are differentiated by their initial particle density. For all wood species examined, particle density decreases throughout the combustion process but at different rates depending on the combustion stage. During the devolatilization stage, the density decreases significantly as a result of rapid mass loss. This sharp decrease causes particles to be light enough to be entrained and/or be lifted off from the grate by the flue gas. -
Table of Contents CHAPTER 31 VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (VPDES) PERMIT REGULATION....1 Part I Definitions and General Program Requirements
Project 1248 - Final STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD Amendment of Regulations Pertaining to Biosolids After Transfer from the Department of Health Table of Contents CHAPTER 31 VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (VPDES) PERMIT REGULATION....1 Part I Definitions and General Program Requirements ...........................................................................1 9VAC25-31-10. Definitions. ..................................................................................................................1 9VAC25-31-20. Purpose......................................................................................................................15 9VAC25-31-25. Applicability of incorporated references based on the dates that they became effective..............................................................................................................................................16 9VAC25-31-30. Federal effluent guidelines........................................................................................16 9VAC25-31-40. Exclusions. .................................................................................................................17 9VAC25-31-50. Prohibitions. ..............................................................................................................18 9VAC25-31-60. Effect of a permit.......................................................................................................19 9VAC25-31-70. Continuation of expiring permits...............................................................................20 -
Best Practices in Multifamily Housing Upgrades
Tackle Energy Efficiency and Indoor Air Quality Together: Best Practices in Multifamily Housing Upgrades Provided by the U.S. EPA in collaboration with U.S. HUD October 2017 PRESENTERS Julia Brooke Hustwit Multifamily Sector Lead, Better Buildings Challenge U.S. HUD Thomas Bowles Residential IAQ Expert EPA Indoor Environments Division William Weber Senior Research Fellow Center for Sustainable Building Research Univ. of Minnesota Rosemary Olsen Executive Director Village of Hempstead Housing Authority, NY AGENDA . Introduction (EPA/HUD) . Why integrate indoor environmental quality measures into ongoing property management, preventative maintenance, building upgrades, and new construction? . How to use the EPA’s Energy Savings Plus Health Guide for Multifamily Building Upgrades . Benefits of holistic approach to energy efficiency and indoor air quality . Mankato and Hempstead case studies . Q&A Session LEARNING OBJECTIVES Webinar Participants will learn how to: . Get started implementing guidance from Energy Savings Plus Health: Multifamily Building Upgrades to integrate IAQ protections into multifamily energy efficiency retrofits and other building upgrade projects . Create a custom verification checklist using the Multifamily Checklist Generator . Apply best practices modeled by case studies from the Mankato Housing Authority and the Hempstead Housing Authority Pilot studies. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Multifamily Buildings2_Title Slide Sector 115 Multifamily Sector Partners 750,000 Housing Units 600 Million Square -
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY Operated By
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION UNION CARBIDE NUCLEAR DIVISION for the I U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ORNL- TM- 2080 12 DESIGN OF BOILER-SUPERHEATER UNITS FOR REPRESENTATIVE CESIUM AND POTASSIUM SPACE POWER PLANTS T. T. Robin NOTICE This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. It is subject to revision or correction and therefore does not represent a final report. LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work. Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission: A. Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. As used in the above, "person acting on behalf of the Commission" includes any employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or provides access to, any information pursuant to his employment or contract with the Commission, or his employment with such contractor. ORNL-TM-2080 Contract No. W-7405-eng-26 Reactor Division DESIGN OF BOILER-SUPERHEATER UNITS FOR REPRESENTATIVE CESIUM AND POTASSIUM SPACE POWER PLANTS T. -
Trade Waste Information Sheet Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown
Trade Waste Information Sheet Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown Preface Liquid waste generated by industry, small business and commercial enterprises is referred to as trade waste. The Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 prohibits the unauthorised discharge of wastes, other than domestic sewage, into the sewerage system. 1. The definition of trade waste is; - The waterborne waste from business, trade or manufacturing property, other than: Waste that is a prohibited substance; or Human waste; or Stormwater. 2. The definition of Domestic waste is; - Faecal matter and urine of human origin and liquid wastes from sinks, baths, basins, showers and similar fixtures designed for personal hygiene in both residential and commercial properties. Cooling Towers Description of Activity The continuous blowdown, or “bleed off” and other wastewater from both commercial and industrial cooling towers is liquid trade waste. “Comfort and process air-conditioning cooling towers” are defined as cooling towers that are dedicated exclusively to (and are an integral part of) heating, ventilation, air-conditioning or refrigeration systems associated with commercial living space air-conditioning, or commercial process air-conditioning such as computer rooms. The discharge rate from cooling towers in this classification should not exceed 500 L/h. “Industrial Cooling Towers” are cooling towers used in manufacturing for rejecting heat extracted from a manufacturing process. This activity is classified as High Risk and an application must be forwarded to Whitsunday Regional Council. 11. Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown Version: 4 Page 1 of 8 Other Issues Commercial and industrial cooling towers generate wastewaters that vary considerably in the contaminants they may contain according to the water treatment utilised. -
Boilers Released 12 December 2017 Trade Waste Discharges from Companies with Boilers Can Harm the Sewerage System
Boilers Released 12 December 2017 Trade waste discharges from companies with boilers can harm the sewerage system. Proper management practices at each site are needed. This guideline outlines the areas of concern and available technologies for the control of these trade wastes. Key trade waste quality requirements Parameter Generally accepted level pH Between 6-12 units Temperature ≤38 degrees C Total Dissolved Solids ≤3500 mg/L Flow rate to sewer Dependant on capacity of receiving sewer Note: Discharge limits may be varied under certain circumstances for individual dischargers. Typical pre-treatment Live or flash steam must never be discharged directly to sewer. Steam boiler or hot water boiler blowdown is cooled below 38 degrees C via a suitably sized blowdown pit or above ground cooling vessel, discharging to sewer via a gully trap. These must have enough retained water volume at ambient temperature to mix with and cool the incoming blowdown. Australian Standard AS3892 - 2001 has more information about blowdown tank design. Heat exchange systems fed from a flash steam vessel can reduce blowdown temperature to an acceptable level. These provide an opportunity for recycling waste heat back to the system. Accumulated solids captured in blowdown equipment are removed as needed for off-site disposal. Boiler water treatment chemicals are stored in bunds, to prevent leaks and spills from reaching the sewerage system. In-ground blowdown pits are covered and finished above ground level to prevent surface or stormwater entry. More information Mains Water Backflow Protection (AS/NZS 3500.1:2015) Backflow Prevention Requirements - Office of the Technical Regulator Bunding and Blind Tanks Guideline . -
Rockford Board of Education Invitation for Bid on Supplies, Materials, Equipment Or Services for School District No
ROCKFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION INVITATION FOR BID ON SUPPLIES, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 205 ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS IFB No. 16-44 Roosevelt Community Education Center Boiler Replacement DATE: March 21, 2016 OFFERS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL: 2:00 P.M. (CDST) on Tuesday, April 12, 2016 RE: IFB No. 16-44 Roosevelt Community Education Center Boiler Replacement. The purpose of this Invitation for Bid (IFB) is to solicit bids for all the mechanical and electrical work associate with the replacement of the boilers at Roosevelt Community Education Center, 978 Haskell Avenue, Rockford, IL 61103. IFB Opening: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., Rockford Board of Education, 6th floor Conference Room, 501 Seventh St., Rockford, IL 61104. If you plan to hand deliver your IFB submission on the due date, please note that you must check in on the 3rd floor prior to coming to the 6th floor. Please allow time for this as late submissions will not be accepted. Copies of the bidding documents are available from Onvia DemandStar, by email from the Purchasing Department, BHFX Digital Imaging and Printing, DG Digital Printing, YCS Printing, Inc., or by download from the District’s Purchasing Bids-RFPs webpage at www.rps205.com. A MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED ON, MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2016 AT 2:30 P.M. (CDST), AT ROOSEVELT COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, 978 HASKELL AVENUE, ROCKFORD, IL 61103 BY OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE. MEET IN THE LOBBY. Refer all questions relative to the business aspect, Instructions to Bidders, Special Conditions, and questions concerning the technical aspect of the documents to the Purchasing Process Manager by email at [email protected]. -
Blue River Biosolids Facility, Final Basis of Design Report
KC Water Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Facility BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FINAL | January 2020 This document is released to the City of Kansas City, Missouri and Shortlisted Respondents as part of the Request for Proposals Package issued January 24, 2020, Project No. 81000821 – Contract Number 1595. This report does not incorporate any modifications made by subsequent addenda since this report was initially issued to Shortlisted Respondents. KC Water Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Facility BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FINAL | January 2020 CERTIFICATION PAGE Project/Contract Number __081000821/1595______ Project Title _Blue River Biosolids Facility Project_______ I am responsible for the following sections of the Basis of Design Report: Structural (SEAL) 00005 Construction Certification Page 050113 Modified For WSD 072916 Contract Central BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT | BLUE RIVER WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT BIOSOLIDS FACILITY | KC WATER Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Purpose of Design Criteria Documents 1-1 1.1.1 Basis of Design Report Organization 1-1 1.2 Design Criteria for the Representative Project 1-2 1.2.1 Fixed Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.2 Indicative Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.3 Indicative-Preferred Design Criteria 1-2 1.3 Project Overview 1-2 Chapter 2: Performance Requirements 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Influent Flows and Loads 2-1 2.3 Process Modeling Conditions and Results 2-3 Chapter 3: Project Siting & Existing Facilities 3.1 Existing Site Conditions 3-1 3.1.1 Site Survey & Potholing Data 3-1 3.1.2 LIDAR Information -
UFC 3-240-13FN Industrial Water Treatment Operation And
UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity) AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location 1 Dec 2005 FOREWORD UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 FOREWORD \1\ The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the more stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. Headquarters, U.S. -
WPDES Permit Fact Sheet for Baker Cheese Factory WI-0050521-10-1
Permit Modification Fact Sheet General Information Permit Number: WI-0050521-10-1 Permittee Name: Baker Cheese Factory Inc Address: N5279 County Road G City/State/Zip: St. Cloud WI 53079 Discharge Location: Discharge is to an un-named tributary, 1/3-mile North of the intersection of County Roads G and T in Fond du Lac County Receiving Water: A wetland tributary (Baker Creek) to the Mullet River Stream Flow (Q7,10): 0 cfs Stream Classification: Warm water sport fish, non-public water supply Facility Description This facility produces mozzarella cheese. This activity results in the discharge of 11,000 gallons per day of noncontact cooling water and boiler blowdown to an absorption pond via outfall 002. The on-site treatment plant discharges treated process wastewater to a wetland tributary via surface water outfall 003. Whey processing wastewater shall also contribute additional wastewater that must be treated prior to discharge to the wetland tributary. Discharge flows are approximately 0.22 million gallons per day. Currently whey processing wastewater is hauled off-site for further processing. Land application outfalls 001 and 004 are retained from the current permit to allow land application of industrial process wastewater and wastewater biosolids resulting from the wastewater treatment process. Wastewater is treated in an activated sludge process with enhanced biological phosphorus removal, consisting of an influent wetwell/lift station, selector tank, aeration basin, and membrane system for liquid/solids separation. High strength