DOCSLIB.ORG

3.0 Project Description

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3.0 Project Description FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GRAYSON REPOWERING PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION March 1, 2018 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Repowering Project is a power plant repowering project that removes 238 megawatts (MW) gross (219 MW net) of existing old, inefficient, inflexible, and unreliable generation equipment that is past the end of its useful life, and replaces it with approximately 270 MW gross (262 MW net), state-of-the-art, efficient equipment that better fits the requirements and needs of the City. The Project is located within an industrial area of the City of Glendale, at 800 Air Way, Glendale, California 91201, just northeast of the Interstate 5 and Highway 134 interchange (Figures 2-1 and 2-2). The Project would be comprised of four natural-gas-fired electrical generating units, totaling approximately 262 MW net (at average annual site ambient conditions) and ancillary buildings and equipment to replace Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8A, and 8BC, at the City’s existing Grayson Power Plant within the City. An existing 48 MW (net) simple-cycle peaking unit (Unit 9) would not be removed, and would continue to operate during construction of the Repowering Project, and then be integrated into the overall Grayson Power Plant when the Project is completed. Simple- cycle units, discussed further in Section 3.1.5, consist of a gas turbine connected to an electric power generator. They are advantageous due to their operational flexibility and can be turned on quickly to provide peak load. The current total generating capacity at the Grayson Power Plant is 286 MW gross (267MW net). The Project would result in a Grayson Power Plant net generation capacity of 310 MW. Landfill gas generated at Scholl Canyon is currently being combusted in Grayson’s Units 3, 4, and 5 boilers. This landfill gas would no longer be transported to Grayson, and the pipeline would be decommissioned as part of the City’s proposed Biogas Renewable Generation Project at Scholl Canyon. Instead, landfill gas is proposed to be used to generate electricity at Scholl Canyon in a proposed 12 MW Biogas Renewable Generation Project or it would be flared off. The Repowering Project would consist of two independently operating simple-cycle natural-gas– fired combustion turbine power blocks, and two independently operating, one-on-one, combined-cycle natural-gas fired power blocks. Combined cycle units, discussed further in Section 3.1.6, utilize a combustion turbine generator to generate electricity while the waste heat from the combustion turbine is used to produce steam to generate additional electricity via a steam turbine. Each of the simple-cycle power blocks would consist of a Siemens SGT-A65 TR (Industrial Trent60) natural-gas-fired combustion turbine generator, emission control system, and ancillary equipment. Each would generate approximately 60 MW net at average annual site conditions. Each of the combined-cycle power blocks would consist of one Siemens SGT-800 natural-gas- fired combustion turbine generator, a NEM manufactured heat recovery steam generator, one Siemens SST-400 steam turbine generator, a recycled water cooled steam condenser, and 3.1 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GRAYSON REPOWERING PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION March 1, 2018 related ancillary equipment that would generate approximately 71 MW net of generation at average annual site conditions. Other equipment and facilities to be constructed and shared by the four power blocks include six natural gas compressors, a gas pressure control and metering station, two cooling towers, water treatment facilities, fire protection and emergency services, generator step-up transformers, other electrical switchgear and axillary transformers, a steam turbine generator building, and an operations and maintenance building. The Project would be constructed on approximately ten acres entirely within the footprint of the existing Grayson Power Plant and located within the City of Glendale’s Utility Operations Center. Project construction would require the demolition and removal of the existing Grayson Power Plant Units 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8A, and 8BC, their ancillary facilities, and the maintenance and operation buildings (Figure 2-3). Demolition and removal work is expected to take nine (9) months, and is scheduled to occur between the second quarter of 2018, and first quarter of 2019. Construction of the Project, which is depicted on Figure 2-4, is estimated to start after demolition is completed in the first quarter of 2019, and take approximately two (2) years with an additional six (6) months required for start-up and commissioning. Construction of the Project is expected to conclude by the fourth quarter of 2020, with commercial operation of the Project by the end of the second quarter of 2021. The Project would reuse existing off-site Linear Facilities, such as, natural gas, potable water, recycled water, stormwater discharge, processed wastewater discharge, and sanitary sewer pipelines, and electrical transmission lines that are currently serving the existing facilities. All interconnections from the Project are located entirely within the footprint of the existing City Utility Operations Center property boundaries (Figure 3-1). No off-site infrastructure development is necessary as part of the Project. The project would use recycled water for all plant operations except domestic use and would reduce the use of potable water provided by the City at the Grayson Power Plant. Potable water would, after completion of the Project, only be used for domestic use, eye wash stations, and fire protection. Although potable water would be used during construction, it would no longer be used for equipment cooling or process water purposes as a part of normal operation, eliminating the use of potable water currently being used for Unit 9 and any potable water used for the units that would be demolished. Wastewater, cooling tower blowdown and other process waste generated by the Project and Unit 9 would be treated as required and discharged into the existing sanitary sewer connection. This discharge would be conveyed back to the Los Angeles-Glendale Water Reclamation Plant, where it would be processed and again recycled to be made available for use at the Project site or at other facilities as recycled water for beneficial use. HRSG blowdown water would be recycled by sending it to the cooling towers and used as makeup water to reduce the Project’s water needs. 3.2 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GRAYSON REPOWERING PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION March 1, 2018 On-site stormwater runoff within the Project site would flow via surface sheet flow and localized gutters to catch basins and to on-site storm drain piping. The storm drain piping would be connected to an on-site collection and pretreatment and infiltration system to allow for infiltration for the design storm event as required by state and local agencies for treatment as further described below. During storm events, larger than the design storm, overflow runoff exceeding the capacity of the infiltration system would be discharged into the adjacent Verdugo Wash and Los Angeles River through existing stormwater outfalls. Stormwater that falls within process equipment containment areas would be collected separately from typical site runoff, treated, and discharged into the existing public sanitary sewer system as further described below. Preliminary grading and drainage plans for the Project are included in Appendix H, Hydrology, and Water Quality Technical Reports. Underground 69-kilovolt (kV) electrical interconnections would connect all four new units to the existing Kellogg Switchyard, which is located in the northeast corner of the Project and entirely within the footprint of the existing City Utility Operations Center property boundaries (Figure 3-1).. The only electrical interconnections from the Project will be at the existing Kellogg Switchyard. From the existing Kellogg Switchyard, power generated by the Project would interconnect to the GWP’s existing distribution system serving the City’s electric load. 3.3 Replace Section of Electrical Distribution Fire Water/Potable Manhole Tie-In Water Line Electric Distribution Communications Fire Water/Potable Tie-In to Airway Manhole Tie-In Water Tie-In Substation Natural Gas Tie-Ins ! ! Gas Meter Station Recycled Water TIe-Ins to Existing Underground Storage Tank ! Existing Waste Water Recycled Wate Tie-In Sewer Manhole Storm Drain To Water Treatment Tie-In Electrical Distribution Tie-In to Kellogg Substation Fire Water/Potable Storm Drain Water Tie-In Tie-In Existing Water Well Storm Drain Storm Wate Tie-In Tie-In Sanitary Sewer Tie-In Recycled Water Tie-In To Cooling Towers ± Griffith Park 0 100 200 Existing Firewater/Potable Water to Site Feet Existing Natural Gas to Site 0 25 50 Existing Recycled Water to Site Meters Existing Sanitary Sewer from Site STANTEC CONSULTING CITY OF GLENDALE Date: 7/7/2017 Existing Storm Drain from Site m Prepared by: HS a h y u 2 b 0 z 1 DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER w 5 u SERVICES Inc. t z o a h p e r re il 2 Existing Waster Water Sewer from Site 0 1 6 PROPOSED GRAYSON REPOWERING PROJECT 5500 Ming Avenue, Suite 300 FIGURE Bakersfield, California 93309 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Phone: (661) 617-5873 Fax: (661) 396-3771 UTILITY CONNECTIONS NO. 3-1 Existing Well Water to Site FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GRAYSON REPOWERING PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION March 1, 2018 The existing facilities at the Grayson Power Plant and those that would be present after implementation of the Project are
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Boiler Chemical Cleaning Techniques
    INFO—0444 Report Rap CA9400049 Atomic Energy Commission de contrfile Control Board de I'energie atomique INFO-0444 Atomic Energy Commission de controle 1*1 Control Board de I'energie atomique PO Box 1046 CP 1046 Onawa Canada Ottawa. Canada K1P5S9 K1P5S9 EVALUATION OF BOILER CHEMICAL CLEANING TECHNIQUES (AECB Project No. 2.221.1) by Monserco Limited A research report prepared for the Atomic Energy Control Board Ottawa, Canada April 1993 1 Canada Research report EVALUATION OF BOILER CHEMICAL CLEANING TECHNIQUES A report prepared by Monserco Limited under contract to the Atomic Energy Control Board. ABSTRACT Deposits in the secondary side of nuclear steam generators (SG) may cause corrosion and disruptions in steam flow. In the Bruce A reactors such deposits have resulted in the derating of two of the units. Hydrolasing has been successful in removing enough of the deposits to permit operation at 100% power, but a considerable amount of deposit remains in physically inaccessible regions of the generators. The only way to remove these deposits is through chemical cleaning. The EPRI/SGOG process, which has been selected by Ontario Hydro for use at the Bruce A station, is described. This process consists of alternating iron removal and copper removal steps, the two metals which comprise the bulk of the deposit in the Bruce A SGs. The iron removal solvent consists of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hydrazine, ammonium hydroxide and a proprietary corrosion inhibitor CCI-801. The copper removal solvent consists of EDTA, ethylene diamine and hydrogen peroxide. Ontario Hydro proposes to dean a bank of four SGs in parallel employing a total of six copper removal steps and four iron removal steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents CHAPTER 31 VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (VPDES) PERMIT REGULATION....1 Part I Definitions and General Program Requirements
    Project 1248 - Final STATE WATER CONTROL BOARD Amendment of Regulations Pertaining to Biosolids After Transfer from the Department of Health Table of Contents CHAPTER 31 VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (VPDES) PERMIT REGULATION....1 Part I Definitions and General Program Requirements ...........................................................................1 9VAC25-31-10. Definitions. ..................................................................................................................1 9VAC25-31-20. Purpose......................................................................................................................15 9VAC25-31-25. Applicability of incorporated references based on the dates that they became effective..............................................................................................................................................16 9VAC25-31-30. Federal effluent guidelines........................................................................................16 9VAC25-31-40. Exclusions. .................................................................................................................17 9VAC25-31-50. Prohibitions. ..............................................................................................................18 9VAC25-31-60. Effect of a permit.......................................................................................................19 9VAC25-31-70. Continuation of expiring permits...............................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Waste Information Sheet Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown
    Trade Waste Information Sheet Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown Preface Liquid waste generated by industry, small business and commercial enterprises is referred to as trade waste. The Water Supply (Safety and Reliability) Act 2008 prohibits the unauthorised discharge of wastes, other than domestic sewage, into the sewerage system. 1. The definition of trade waste is; - The waterborne waste from business, trade or manufacturing property, other than: Waste that is a prohibited substance; or Human waste; or Stormwater. 2. The definition of Domestic waste is; - Faecal matter and urine of human origin and liquid wastes from sinks, baths, basins, showers and similar fixtures designed for personal hygiene in both residential and commercial properties. Cooling Towers Description of Activity The continuous blowdown, or “bleed off” and other wastewater from both commercial and industrial cooling towers is liquid trade waste. “Comfort and process air-conditioning cooling towers” are defined as cooling towers that are dedicated exclusively to (and are an integral part of) heating, ventilation, air-conditioning or refrigeration systems associated with commercial living space air-conditioning, or commercial process air-conditioning such as computer rooms. The discharge rate from cooling towers in this classification should not exceed 500 L/h. “Industrial Cooling Towers” are cooling towers used in manufacturing for rejecting heat extracted from a manufacturing process. This activity is classified as High Risk and an application must be forwarded to Whitsunday Regional Council. 11. Cooling Towers & Boiler Blowdown Version: 4 Page 1 of 8 Other Issues Commercial and industrial cooling towers generate wastewaters that vary considerably in the contaminants they may contain according to the water treatment utilised.
    [Show full text]
  • Boilers Released 12 December 2017 Trade Waste Discharges from Companies with Boilers Can Harm the Sewerage System
    Boilers Released 12 December 2017 Trade waste discharges from companies with boilers can harm the sewerage system. Proper management practices at each site are needed. This guideline outlines the areas of concern and available technologies for the control of these trade wastes. Key trade waste quality requirements Parameter Generally accepted level pH Between 6-12 units Temperature ≤38 degrees C Total Dissolved Solids ≤3500 mg/L Flow rate to sewer Dependant on capacity of receiving sewer Note: Discharge limits may be varied under certain circumstances for individual dischargers. Typical pre-treatment Live or flash steam must never be discharged directly to sewer. Steam boiler or hot water boiler blowdown is cooled below 38 degrees C via a suitably sized blowdown pit or above ground cooling vessel, discharging to sewer via a gully trap. These must have enough retained water volume at ambient temperature to mix with and cool the incoming blowdown. Australian Standard AS3892 - 2001 has more information about blowdown tank design. Heat exchange systems fed from a flash steam vessel can reduce blowdown temperature to an acceptable level. These provide an opportunity for recycling waste heat back to the system. Accumulated solids captured in blowdown equipment are removed as needed for off-site disposal. Boiler water treatment chemicals are stored in bunds, to prevent leaks and spills from reaching the sewerage system. In-ground blowdown pits are covered and finished above ground level to prevent surface or stormwater entry. More information Mains Water Backflow Protection (AS/NZS 3500.1:2015) Backflow Prevention Requirements - Office of the Technical Regulator Bunding and Blind Tanks Guideline .
    [Show full text]
  • Rockford Board of Education Invitation for Bid on Supplies, Materials, Equipment Or Services for School District No
    ROCKFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION INVITATION FOR BID ON SUPPLIES, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 205 ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS IFB No. 16-44 Roosevelt Community Education Center Boiler Replacement DATE: March 21, 2016 OFFERS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL: 2:00 P.M. (CDST) on Tuesday, April 12, 2016 RE: IFB No. 16-44 Roosevelt Community Education Center Boiler Replacement. The purpose of this Invitation for Bid (IFB) is to solicit bids for all the mechanical and electrical work associate with the replacement of the boilers at Roosevelt Community Education Center, 978 Haskell Avenue, Rockford, IL 61103. IFB Opening: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., Rockford Board of Education, 6th floor Conference Room, 501 Seventh St., Rockford, IL 61104. If you plan to hand deliver your IFB submission on the due date, please note that you must check in on the 3rd floor prior to coming to the 6th floor. Please allow time for this as late submissions will not be accepted. Copies of the bidding documents are available from Onvia DemandStar, by email from the Purchasing Department, BHFX Digital Imaging and Printing, DG Digital Printing, YCS Printing, Inc., or by download from the District’s Purchasing Bids-RFPs webpage at www.rps205.com. A MANDATORY PRE-BID MEETING WILL BE CONDUCTED ON, MONDAY, MARCH 28, 2016 AT 2:30 P.M. (CDST), AT ROOSEVELT COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, 978 HASKELL AVENUE, ROCKFORD, IL 61103 BY OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE. MEET IN THE LOBBY. Refer all questions relative to the business aspect, Instructions to Bidders, Special Conditions, and questions concerning the technical aspect of the documents to the Purchasing Process Manager by email at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Blue River Biosolids Facility, Final Basis of Design Report
    KC Water Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Facility BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FINAL | January 2020 This document is released to the City of Kansas City, Missouri and Shortlisted Respondents as part of the Request for Proposals Package issued January 24, 2020, Project No. 81000821 – Contract Number 1595. This report does not incorporate any modifications made by subsequent addenda since this report was initially issued to Shortlisted Respondents. KC Water Blue River Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Facility BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT FINAL | January 2020 CERTIFICATION PAGE Project/Contract Number __081000821/1595______ Project Title _Blue River Biosolids Facility Project_______ I am responsible for the following sections of the Basis of Design Report: Structural (SEAL) 00005 Construction Certification Page 050113 Modified For WSD 072916 Contract Central BASIS OF DESIGN REPORT | BLUE RIVER WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT BIOSOLIDS FACILITY | KC WATER Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Purpose of Design Criteria Documents 1-1 1.1.1 Basis of Design Report Organization 1-1 1.2 Design Criteria for the Representative Project 1-2 1.2.1 Fixed Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.2 Indicative Design Criteria 1-2 1.2.3 Indicative-Preferred Design Criteria 1-2 1.3 Project Overview 1-2 Chapter 2: Performance Requirements 2.1 Introduction 2-1 2.2 Influent Flows and Loads 2-1 2.3 Process Modeling Conditions and Results 2-3 Chapter 3: Project Siting & Existing Facilities 3.1 Existing Site Conditions 3-1 3.1.1 Site Survey & Potholing Data 3-1 3.1.2 LIDAR Information
    [Show full text]
  • UFC 3-240-13FN Industrial Water Treatment Operation And
    UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) INDUSTRIAL WATER TREATMENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity) AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location 1 Dec 2005 FOREWORD UFC 3-240-13FN 25 May 2005 FOREWORD \1\ The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the more stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. Headquarters, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • WPDES Permit Fact Sheet for Baker Cheese Factory WI-0050521-10-1
    Permit Modification Fact Sheet General Information Permit Number: WI-0050521-10-1 Permittee Name: Baker Cheese Factory Inc Address: N5279 County Road G City/State/Zip: St. Cloud WI 53079 Discharge Location: Discharge is to an un-named tributary, 1/3-mile North of the intersection of County Roads G and T in Fond du Lac County Receiving Water: A wetland tributary (Baker Creek) to the Mullet River Stream Flow (Q7,10): 0 cfs Stream Classification: Warm water sport fish, non-public water supply Facility Description This facility produces mozzarella cheese. This activity results in the discharge of 11,000 gallons per day of noncontact cooling water and boiler blowdown to an absorption pond via outfall 002. The on-site treatment plant discharges treated process wastewater to a wetland tributary via surface water outfall 003. Whey processing wastewater shall also contribute additional wastewater that must be treated prior to discharge to the wetland tributary. Discharge flows are approximately 0.22 million gallons per day. Currently whey processing wastewater is hauled off-site for further processing. Land application outfalls 001 and 004 are retained from the current permit to allow land application of industrial process wastewater and wastewater biosolids resulting from the wastewater treatment process. Wastewater is treated in an activated sludge process with enhanced biological phosphorus removal, consisting of an influent wetwell/lift station, selector tank, aeration basin, and membrane system for liquid/solids separation. High strength
    [Show full text]
  • Water Recycle As a Sustainability Tool for Industrial Plants
    Water Recycle as a Sustainability Tool for Industrial Plants Darrell Hartwick Buckman Khurram Shahzad Buckman Keywords: Water Conservation, Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR), Chloride, Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC), Fertilizer Originally presented at the International Technical Symposium by FFC, October 17-18, 2018 ABSTRACT Water scarcity is becoming an issue in many parts of the world and the ability to maximize water utilization is a key part of sustainable operations. Given the heavy industrial reliance on evaporative cooling systems to reject heat, these systems are a critical component for most plants. In this paper we will discuss the options for minimizing water consumption based upon the principles of minimization, recycling and reuse. Three different approaches will be discussed and illustrated using case histories of actual plants and what was learned from them. INTRODUCTION While there are a variety of different water sources, fresh water is the preferred source since it requires the least treatment for domestic, industrial or agricultural usage. However, the amount of available fresh water is limited and represents less than 0.8% of the total water available. Not only is the amount of fresh water limited, but availability is not uniform, and it varies considerably by geography. Competition for water by different segments makes it a very valuable commodity, and these competing demands will increase in the future. The previous graphic shows the share of fresh water use by section in the 2010 – 2014 time period. Understandably, countries with large populations and varying rainfall can see the majority of the fresh water being used to support agriculture. Domestic water consumption is expected to increase in regions where living standards are rising, and this will put additional pressure on water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Install an Automatic Blowdown Control System
    Energy Tips – Steam Steam Tip Sheet #23 • April 2004 Industrial Technologies Program Background Install an Automatic Blowdown Control System Industrial Technologies Program To reduce the levels of suspended During the surface blowdown process, a controlled amount of boiler water containing high and total dissolved solids in a dissolved solids concentrations is discharged into the sewer. In addition to wasting water boiler, water is periodically and chemicals, the blowdown process wastes heat energy, because the blowndown liquid is discharged or blown down. High at the same temperature as the steam produced—approximately 366°F for 150 pounds per dissolved solids concentrations square inch gauge (psig) saturated steam—and blowdown heat recovery systems, if available, can lead to foaming and carry- are not 100% efficient. (Waste heat may be recovered through the use of a blowdown heat exchanger or a flash tank in conjunction with a heat recovery system. For more information, over of boiler water into the see Steam Tip Sheet #10, Recover Heat from Boiler Blowdown). steam. This could lead to water hammer, which may damage Advantages of Automatic Control Systems piping, steam traps, or process With manual control of surface blowdown, there is no way to determine the concentration equipment. Surface blowdown of dissolved solids in the boiler water, nor the optimal blowdown rate. Operators do not removes dissolved solids that know when to blow down the boiler, nor for how long. Likewise, using a fixed rate of blow- accumulate near the boiler liquid down does not take into account changes in makeup and feedwater conditions, or varia- surface, and is often a continuous tions in steam demand or condensate return.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA Regular City Council Meeting CITY HALL Webster City, Iowa October 1, 2018 5:30P.M
    AGENDA Regular City Council Meeting CITY HALL Webster City, Iowa October 1, 2018 5:30p.m. ROLL CALL Approval of Agenda Pledge of Allegiance A. PETITIONS - COMMUNICATIONS - REQUESTS This is the time of the meeting that a citizen may address the Council on a matter not on the Agenda. Except in cases of emergency, the City Council will not take any action at this meeting, but may ask the City Staff to research the matter or have the matter placed on the Agenda for a future meeting. 1. Public Information B. MINUTES AND CLAIMS The following items have been deemed to be non-controversial, routine actions to be approved by the Council in a single motion. If a Council member, or a member of the audience wishes to have an item removed from this list, it will be considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. 1. Minutes of September 17, 2018 2. Resolution on Payroll for the period ending September 15, 2018 and paid on September 21, 2018 3. Resolution on Bills Fund List C. GENERALAGENDA 1. COUNCIL MEMORANDUM: Third Reading of a proposed Ordinance, an ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances of the City of Webster City, Iowa, 1996, by amending Chapter 123, Pertaining to Zoning, as it relates to Fences. Ordinance a. Pass and Adopt Ordinance 2. COUNCIL MEMORANDUM: 8-20-18 meeting Third Reading of a proposed Ordinance, an ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances of the City of Webster City, Iowa, 1996, by amending Chapter 99 Pertaining to Sewer Rental. Ordinance a. Pass and Adopt Ordinance 1 of 90 1 City Council Meeting Agenda October 1, 2018 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Efficiency Manual
    WaterWater EfficiencyEfficiency ManualManual for Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Facilities BY: N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Pollution Prevention and Enviornmental Assistance Division of Water Resources Land-of-Sky Regional Council, Waste Reduction Partners Water Efficiency Manual for Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Facilities A joint publication of the Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance and Division of Water Resources of the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and Land-of-Sky Regional Council. May 2009 The information contained in this publication is believed to be accurate and reliable. However, the application of this information is at the reader’s own risk. Mention of products, services or vendors in the publication does not constitute an endorsement by the state of North Carolina, nor the Land-of-Sky Regional Council. The information contained in this publication may be cited freely. State of North Carolina Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Dee Freeman, Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources Gary Hunt, Director of the Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance Tom Reeder, Director of the Division of Water Resources When to Use This Guide Now, to determine what you can do to reduce water use, improve efficiency and save money in your operation. As you plan and budget for next year, to determine what programs, equipment and employee participation will be necessary to use water more efficiently. Before you purchase any new water-using domestic fixtures, cooling, heating, processing, landscaping and facility support equipment and service contracts. Before you seek buy-in and support from your management, maintenance and production personnel.
    [Show full text]