The Winter War: a Study of Russo-Finnish Diplomacy 1938-1940

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Winter War: a Study of Russo-Finnish Diplomacy 1938-1940 University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 8-1-1960 The winter war: A study of Russo-Finnish diplomacy 1938-1940 Richard William Condon University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Condon, Richard William, "The winter war: A study of Russo-Finnish diplomacy 1938-1940" (1960). Student Work. 415. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/415 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. t m m w m war« 4 Bfwt or nmaompmrnn diplomacy i 93®*%9bo A flis s ls to 4110 fa o u liy o f 1&e OafNHrtNMt o f History Municipal tJnireratty of Omaha Jjo Partial Fulfillia#nt of the !ta|tt transit ta for tho Dagrsa Ho® tor of Art* t r Rleharti William Condon August I960 UMI Number: EP73053 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73053 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 It i s the purpose of th is study to shod soise ligh t on tho diplomacy Which took place between Finland and the Soviet >Mon from 193$ to 1940* That the Finn# successfully mot end blocked Russian efforts to make Finland # part of the !!*$*S*fL I# ® fact* Stow i t is for tho historian to seek out and evaluate h m and why this vu# p o ssib le. Because o f th® propinquity of Finland to Russia and her century o f axl&tfmoi as a Grand Duchy of Cserlet Russia, th® Flm s h#va coasc to know and understand th® Russian mind and thought* Herein lies th# validity of a study of this nature for in th® present world situation there is & need on the m rt of th# West to understand and evaluate &i#olan Foreign policy* through the study o f the manner In which t'm Finnish government conducted and s t i l l conduct# it# relations with the Soviet Union the Western Fewer# ®ay wall .find a clue to a means of meeting an Aggressive and dynamic Busman policy* Tki® author wishes to thank the staff of the Gene Employ library for their valuable assistance rendered during th# mo?'the required to complete this project. Appreciation is also oxtresaed to Mrs. #uth KonttSnon of Suomi College and thm Firc:i#h-^»erlc&n library, Hancock, Michigan, for the invaluable aid rendered in securing many of the sources used in thi s study* T'fepeclal thanks ere due Dr* A. Stanley Trieketi, Qmirmn of tin® frpartHiert of History of the University of Omaha, for the continual interest, patience, and lnruner*ble constructive criticisms extended during he preparation of this study* Without the assistance of above- mentioned persons, the completion o f this work would have beer lnflnietely more difficult* R*W.C. c m p t m fa c e x* mjmmcfm •*«#«•**«**••*••*«»••• 1 Finland before 1X55 ««»«»«®«o*®®»«*«oo 1 Grand Bushy of Finland* Swedish Rule oo««»e9®o 3 Grand Dueby of Finland* R ussian Mt« 3 Independence and C iv il lawr • *»•*•«*•««•*•• 1? Chapter Conclusion 29 II* fUCISC TFT-: STOHH H Eusso-Fiitnlsh Non-aggression Treaty® »®«®e®®®®© Mi ftilltaxy Appropriation# c,®®®®*®®*# *««»«* A Reorganisation of the Art^r 36 Scandinavian Orientation »••••••♦***•*••« 33 Coaler A ttitu d e Toward# Germany 1*1 Finnish neutrality Policy e®**®®*®®®**®®* Ms Aaland Island Question **««**•*#* 1*5 Chapter Conclusion «»**•••»«*•»•»••*«* h? m . m t ctoow gather **********.*.*** 0 ®* 1*9 Conversations with Yartaev «••««**« »9ft*«9« 1*9 Cottvaraaiiotta in Moscow (Deeesher 1933) ••«*«•«» 61 f^oeeoi? C larifies Its Demands (Hereto 1939) ® * » • « ® ® 63 Boris Stein Presses Russia1• Case *»«»«»•<.*«« 65 Aagl ©*Freneh<*Rttesi*n Kegotlatlone • •*«•»«*••<> 70 fttteso^Gersaan n egotiations and Treaty 71 Russo-Gemm Attack m Poland 73 C h ap ter Conclusion ««»#»« «««»#*« 71* i v CHAPTER PAG® IV* MOSCOW WSOOTIATOTS . * * ................... 77 Russian Demands cm the Baltic States • • + 77 Moscow Turns to Finland • »•*•**««*••»* + • ?? Instructions to Finnish fte&otiators •••••««»«» 79 First Trio to Moscow (October 9# 1939) • ••••***« SI Ha turn to Helsinki and New 'Instructions «•««*«. • 39 Second Trip to Moscow (O cto b er 23? 1939) «•*«««« 90 Appeal to Sweden 0 . <»..«.».»»«................... 92 He*»examina tion of th e Finnish Position »*««.««* 9h Third Trip to Moscow (October 31$ 1939) •««««*•• 96 Breakdown o f the Moscow negotiations •••««••«» lOli Chapter Conclusion *«.•*•».»*•«»»»«•« 106 V* UST BATS 0? PEACE ABB UNSECURED WAR * * * ................ 108 "Hainila Incident** , ................... t o 108 Russian and Finnish Proposals for Settlement of Border Incident • *»•*»****««•#•«»«• 109 Moscow Severs Relations with Finland 110 Attack Without ^ami.ng *»**#■•**■###*«*«* H I Outside Offers to Mediate »*»*•«*•**••«» 112 The Dispute Taken to the Xeagus of Nations * » • * « 113 Aid from Various Rations *•*«««*•**»«•»• 113 Chapter Conclusion »•»«.*««• »»•«»»«•»« H 5 VI. THE TOtTOBf PDA I) TO PPACK......................................... 116 Finland’s Bisadrsvttages and Advantages in War » « « » * 116 Various Offer® of Mediation »»«.»«« ««»»««» 117 chapter H&3R Qemm ifferts 3l2.^ Mrs, Wsoli^oki Offers to Contact, '%n>, Kollcmtal * * * » 122 The Soviet Qomrmmnx Agrees to ?$e®otiate s i t h the Ckwmsaewt • *«*«**««•• X2li Termer*s First f t e it to Stockholm (February li# 19h0) Q « 126 .Mltain and franc® Consider Aid to Finland » « « » • « ® 12? Kaanerhetw and ffts Staff Consulted m Possible Territorial Concessions • •••*«••••« 1 3 0 Divided Opinions in the Cabinet 1 3 1 Termer fs Second V isit to Stockholm {February 12* 19b£) » 133 Gar*ftanry Suggests a Mediation Plan 13k Finland 4sks Sweden to Mediate *••»•••»•«#••136 the B,S»S«R» Clarifies Its Position * # • * ...........#1 3 ? Tanner *e Third H a lt to Sfockholn (February 2?, I9k0) » liil Finland Beeides to Hafee Peace (February 29$ X9h0 ) « • « Hi3 Benewed Offers of Aid from Britain and franco , « » « « lilt Finland Subnlta to Russian feme *•»••»«#•*•* 1UB 4 Final Anglo-French Offer of Aid (March ?f 19l*€> « • • 11*9 Moscow f;fak®s Additional Beeeads »«#*«»»«#«« # 11*9 The Peace Treaty Is Signed ,«»«•«*••»« «*«« 151 Finnish Territorial losses •«»*««»*<>»«»««<» 151 Ratification of the Peace #•»«•,# 152 m u m m ' j s r m ......................... 1 5 3 APPfFMlI A • • « • ....................... 159 kPWM^lt B,#,***,#**.**#*******#**** 161* n w i.w m h ^ n # -, 168 ■mFTBR I Somewhere about the beginning of the Christian era there appeared in a land of lakes and forests, borderso by the Baltic Sea m the south an" southwest, Sweden and Morway m the west and northwest, and Russia on- th e e a s t, a p e o p le idiom T a c itu s c a lle d th e Ferns 1. T hese w ere th e ancestors of the presmt-day Finns, the inhabitants of Finland or in Finnish, 3y<^i« Many conjectures have been made concerning tlu origin of these people, but it is generally conceded by contemporary scholars that they originally aade their home in the vicinity of the Oral mour** tains and along the Volga Elver* This does not mean, however, that they arc related to the Teutons, Slavs, or .Mongols. They are ethnologically relate,; to the VotjakS, Oherais, and Ostjak® in Central 'Russia while linguistically, Finnish belongs to the Finno-Uric language group ana is relate, to hstoniau ana, sore distantly, to Hungarian, “This liagistie affinity, however, has had no influence on the development of Finnish institutions. More recent ami prolonged contacts with In-o-r.uropean peoples, notably Seanaanaviana, arc today dominant in Finnish culture.**2 For the first mSHenium >* of their occupation of the present *The following chapter is based mainly on Mantere am.! sarva, K^Sfcikoulua Suooea ^l^tprla. (Porvoq, Finland: Berner Soderstrom Gsakcyhtib, 1951), pp. 1-344, and Aaatole Mazour, bstw.gfn hast g|^ l£l£« (Princeton: c. Van Nostrum Co.., Inc,, 1956), pp. 1-93, unless otherwise n o te d . 2 Hcikki Baris, institutions is PiTlftflti- (Minneapolis, Minn, s University of Minnesota Press, 1958), p. 196. 2 area called Finland, the Pin m lived a primitive life. The Roman historian Tacitus described then as . squalidly poor; neither arms nor homes have they; their food is herbs, their clothing skins, their bed th e ea rth . * *"3 But in one sense they could not be blamed for this, for the land they came to settle ms far from salubrious; w ith a harsh climate, poor soil, and a su m er season too short for much serious farming.4 The rigorous climate and their precarious e x iste n c e se rv ed to harden the n ature of the Finns and did much to mold th e ir character to what it is today. This ch aracter m s well summarised by the nineteenth century Finnish historian and n o v e l i s t , Zachris Topclius, in th e fo llo w * ing m anner i The general traits of their character are: hardened, patient strength; resignations parscrvaraacs allied to a certain obstinacy; a slow, eoKitesaplative way of thinkingt unwillingness to become aa$ry, but a tendency wh m anger has been aroused, to indulge' in unmeasured wrath; coolness in deadly peril, but caution afterwards; inclination for waiting, deferring, living for the day, interrupted sometimes by unseasonable haste; adherence to the old and well-known, an aversion to anything new; attention to duty; law-abiding habit of mind) love of liberty* hospitality; honesty; a predeliction for religious meditation revealing itself in true piety, which, however, is apt to have too much respect for the mere letter.
Recommended publications
  • RUSSO-FINNISH RELATIONS, 1937-1947 a Thesis Presented To
    RUSSO-FINNISH RELATIONS, 1937-1947 A Thesis Presented to the Department of History Carroll College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Academic Honors with a B.A. Degree In History by Rex Allen Martin April 2, 1973 SIGNATURE PAGE This thesis for honors recognition has been approved for the Department of History. II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge thankfully A. Patanen, Attach^ to the Embassy of Finland, and Mrs. Anna-Malja Kurlkka of the Library of Parliament in Helsinki for their aid in locating the documents used In my research. For his aid In obtaining research material, I wish to thank Mr. H. Palmer of the Inter-Library Loan Department of Carroll College. To Mr. Lang and to Dr. Semmens, my thanks for their time and effort. To Father William Greytak, without whose encouragement, guidance, and suggestions this thesis would never have been completed, I express my warmest thanks. Rex A. Martin 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... v I. 1937 TO 1939 ........................................................................................ 1 II. 1939 TO1 940.................................................... 31 III. 1940 TO1 941............................................................................................. 49 IV. 1941 TO1 944 ......................................................................................... 70 V. 1944 TO 1947 ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the Occasion of Finlandia Foundation
    United Nations Nations Unies T HE PRESIDENT OF THE GEN ERAL ASSEMBLY LE PRESIDENT DE L’AS SEMBLEE GENERALE 3 December 2000 Statement of H.E. Mr. Harri Holkeri, President of the 55th Session of the General Assembly, on the the occasion of Finlandia Foundation Independence Day Celebrations Ladies and gentlemen, Next Wednesday marks the 83rd anniversary of the independent Republic of Finland. You, ladies and gentlemen, hardly need an introduction to Finland. But if I had to tell the average American in the street about Finland, I would tell him that the area of Finland is about almost three times the size of State of New York but it has only about five million inhabitants. I would tell him that Finns love their country and that Finland was recently the top of two important lists. Firstly it ranked as was number one when countries were compared in having the least amount of corruption. At the same time, we were heading the World Series in liberalization and deregulation of business laws. Then I would ask him if he has read in his schoolbooks about the country that keeps its word - that pays its debts. If my American in the street would like me to continue, I would tell him that Finland is not overpopulated, nor undernourished. It is a typical, modern European country, proud of its history and culture, and combining natural beauty and modern technology. I would also say that my country is very middle-class. It lacks the ultra rich, but it also lacks in extreme poverty. It strives for high levels of education and social security.
    [Show full text]
  • Finnish Studies
    Journal of Finnish Studies Volume 23 Number 1 November 2019 ISSN 1206-6516 ISBN 978-1-7328298-1-7 JOURNAL OF FINNISH STUDIES EDITORIAL AND BUSINESS OFFICE Journal of Finnish Studies, Department of English, 1901 University Avenue, Evans 458, Box 2146, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TEXAS 77341-2146, USA Tel. 1.936.294.1420; Fax 1.936.294.1408 E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL STAFF Helena Halmari, Editor-in-Chief, Sam Houston State University [email protected] Hanna Snellman, Co-Editor, University of Helsinki [email protected] Scott Kaukonen, Assoc. Editor, Sam Houston State University [email protected] Hilary-Joy Virtanen, Asst. Editor, Finlandia University [email protected] Sheila Embleton, Book Review Editor, York University [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Börje Vähämäki, Founding Editor, JoFS, Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto Raimo Anttila, Professor Emeritus, University of California, Los Angeles Michael Branch, Professor Emeritus, University of London Thomas DuBois, Professor, University of Wisconsin, Madison Sheila Embleton, Distinguished Research Professor, York University Aili Flint, Emerita Senior Lecturer, Associate Research Scholar, Columbia University Tim Frandy, Assistant Professor, Western Kentucky University Daniel Grimley, Professor, Oxford University Titus Hjelm, Associate Professor, University of Helsinki Daniel Karvonen, Senior Lecturer, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Johanna Laakso, Professor, University of Vienna Jason Lavery, Professor, Oklahoma State University James P. Leary, Professor Emeritus, University of Wisconsin, Madison Andrew Nestingen, Associate Professor, University of Washington, Seattle Jyrki Nummi, Professor, University of Helsinki Jussi Nuorteva, Director General, The National Archives of Finland Juha Pentikäinen, Professor, University of Lapland Oiva Saarinen, Professor Emeritus, Laurentian University, Sudbury Beth L.
    [Show full text]
  • Sami Suodenjoki, Popular Songs As Vehicles for Political Imagination
    Sami Suodenjoki, Popular Songs as Vehicles for Political Imagination Sami SUODENJOKI POPULAR SONGS AS VEHICLES FOR POLITICAL IMAGINATION: The Russian Revolutions and the Finnish Civil War in Finnish Song Pamphlets, 1917–1918* The rule of rogues is now ended, as our country is ruled by the government of men, by the People’s Delegation, and therefore we rejoice! Yet a battle still lies before us until the hiding places, the nooks are empty, until the bourgeoisie, its rabble of villains, is disarmed and harmless. With these verses from “The Finnish Spring,” the songwriter David Lauri Leivo called workers to arms in March 1918, during the first deci- sive battles of the Finnish Civil War. The militant verses were included in a small collection of songs titled Lahtarikenraali Mannerheimin husaarit (The Hussars of Butcher-General Mannerheim). This eight-page pamphlet * The author acknowledges the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. 228 Ab Imperio, 2/2019 circulated in southern Finland, which was controlled by the socialist Red Guards.1 By means of moral polarization, mockery of the bourgeois enemy, and glorification of the proletarian struggle against oppression, the song pamphlet reflected and boosted the revolutionary mood among the Reds. Because the pamphlet marked out Leivo as a Red sympathizer, the question naturally arises of what happened to him when the Whites crushed the so- cialist revolutionaries only a month later. His verses also raise more general questions about the role of popular songs in revolutionary mobilization and political propaganda. In this article, I explore how printed songs published in 1917 and 1918 reflected and in turn affected the ongoing revolutionary situation and politi- cal imagination in Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Russian Revolution
    The History of the Russian Revolution Leon Trotsky Volume Three Contents Notes on the Text i 1 THE PEASANTRY BEFORE OCTOBER 1 2 THE PROBLEM OF NATIONALITIES 25 3 WITHDRAWAL FROM THE PRE -PARLIAMENT AND STRUGGLE FOR THE SOVIET CONGRESS 46 4 THE MILITARY-REVOLUTIONARY COMMITTEE 66 5 LENIN SUMMONS TO INSURRECTION 93 6 THE ART OF INSURRECTION 125 7 THE CONQUEST OF THE CAPITAL 149 8 THE CAPTURE OF THE WINTER PALACE 178 9 THE OCTOBER INSURRECTION 205 10 THE CONGRESS OF THE SOVIET DICTATORSHIP 224 11 CONCLUSION 255 NOTE TO THE APPENDICES (AND APPENDIX NO. 1) 260 2 3 CONTENTS SOCIALISM IN A SEPARATE COUNTRY 283 HISTORIC REFERENCES ON THE THEORY OF “PERMANENT REVOLU- TION” 319 4 CONTENTS Notes on the Text The History of the Russian Revolution Volume Two Leon Trotsky First published: 1930 This edition: 2000 by Chris Russell for Marxists Internet Archive Please note: The text may make reference to page numbers within this document. These page numbers were maintained during the transcription process to remain faithful to the original edition and not this version and, therefore, are likely to be inaccurate. This statement applies only to the text itself and not any indices or tables of contents which have been reproduced for this edition. i ii Notes on the Text CHAPTER 1 THE PEASANTRY BEFORE OCTOBER Civilization has made the peasantry its pack animal. The bourgeoisie in the long run only changed the form of the pack. Barely tolerated on the threshold of the national life, the peasant stands essentially outside the threshold of science.
    [Show full text]
  • FINLAND's RELATIONS with the SOVIET UNION, 1940-1952 By
    FINLAND'S RELATIONS WITH THE SOVIET UNION, 1940-1952 by HANS PETER KROSBY B.A., University of British Columbia, 1955 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in INTERNATIONAL STUDIES We accept this Thesis as conforming to the required standard: UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1958 ABSTRACT In March 194-0, Finland had just completed another life and death struggle with the Soviet Union, the second such struggle since Bolshevik autocracy- replaced Tsarist autocracy in Russia in 1917. During the following fifteen months, Soviet diplomacy endeavoured to complete the job which the Red Army had "begun. By a unilateral and extremely liberal interpretation of the Peace Treaty of March 12, 1940, the Soviet Union tried to isolate Finland from her other neighbours and to establish a favourable basis for a complete annexation of Finland in the manner of the three Baltic States. Surrounded by Soviet and German military might, and noticing the increasing friction in the Nazi-Soviet alliance, Finland, in order to save herself from an imminent Soviet invasion, grasped the only straw which seemed to offer some hope: a transit agreement for German troops from Finland's Bothnian coast to Kirkenes in oc• cupied Norway. The resulting presence of German troops in the country did save Finland from becoming the seventeenth Soviet Socialist Republic in 1940 or 194-1* but it also involved her deeply in the Nazi-Soviet conflict which followed. When Germany attacked the Soviet Union in June 194-1, Finland tried in vain to have her neutrality respected, and she was attacked by Soviet forces three days after the German aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Started, 20 DECEMBER 1939, NEAR
    Winter War Operations This document is designed to be used with the Winter War Scenario Location Map.pdf file located in the main game directory, which provides an overview map of the contested area and the general locations of the actions listed here. 001.Getting Started.scn – 10 turns 20 December 1939, near Kollaa River (Hypothetical) The struggle to control the Loimola road and the railroad track raged on from early December to the end of war. Finnish 34th Infantry Regiment used every available reserve squad to counter dozens of Russian probes into the Kollaa defense line; sending fire brigades to counter another crisis against an overhelming enemy. This scenario depicts a situation where a Russian probe manages to capture a forward trench line. Finnish HQ reacts swiftly and sends a company to recapture the trench before Russians find time to consolidate their gains. 002.Terijoki.scn – 16 turns - Winterhorde Onward Ride 30 November 1939, Terijoki, Finland Karelian Isthmus As the Russo-Finnish War launched the Kremlin pompously anticipated a steamroller campaign that would consume tiny Finland within a week. With an air of overconfidence, the RKKA crossed the Finnish border on the morning of 30 November woefully unprepared for the hell on earth that would become known as the Winter War. Knowing that the Russian prediction may not be too far off of the mark due to the fact that Finnish Forces were hopelessly outnumbered and possessed virtually no armor, Finnish High Command organized four "Covering Groups" that would fight a series of stubborn delaying actions back to the Mannerheim Line.
    [Show full text]
  • Karelia As a Finnish-Russian Issue: Re-Negotiating the Relationship Between National Identity
    EU-RUSSIA PAPER • MAY 2014 183 Karelia as a Finnish-Russian Issue: Re-negotiating the Relationship between National Identity, CEURUS Territory and Sovereignty Christopher S. BROWNING Reader of International Politics, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick Pertti JOENNIEMI Visiting Researcher, Karelian Institute, University of Eastern Finland The Centre for EU-Russia Studies (CEURUS) is a multidisciplinary centre for research and teaching at the University of Tartu, Estonia. It serves as a contact point for scholars, students and experts who share an interest in the evolving relationship between the European Union and the Russian Federation. CEURUS coordinates and sponsors a variety of activities related to research, teaching and public out- reach in the area of EU-Russia relations. For more information, see http://ceurus.ut.ee The Centre for EU-Russia Studies undertakes quality control in editing its publica- tions. However, the opinions expressed in the Centre’s publications are those of the authors and contributors, and do not necessarily refl ect those of CEURUS, the University of Tartu or the organization to which the authors are affi liated. Published articles may be works in progress and CEURUS will not prevent their subsequent publication in an academic journal or a book. Suggested format for citing this paper: Browning, C. S.; Joenniemi, P. (2014), ‘Karelia as a Finnish-Russian Issue: Re-negotiating the Relationship between National Iden- tity, Territory and Sovereignty’, CEURUS EU-Russia Papers, No. 18. Centre for EU-Russia Studies, University of Tartu http://ceurus.ut.ee Editor: Martin Mölder Cover design: Kalle Paalits Layout: Tiia Ilus Copyright: authors, University of Tartu, 2014 ISSN 2228-1282 University of Tartu Press www.tyk.ee KARELIA AS A FINNISH-RUSSIAN ISSUE: RE-NEGOTIATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NATIONAL IDENTITY, TERRITORY AND SOVEREIGNTY INTRODUCTION As stereotypes would have it Finland is a stable, peaceful Nordic country, located in the calm environment of northern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoover Digest
    HOOVER DIGEST RESEARCH + OPINION ON PUBLIC POLICY SPRING 2019 NO. 2 THE HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace was established at Stanford University in 1919 by Herbert Hoover, a member of Stanford’s pioneer graduating class of 1895 and the thirty-first president of the United States. Created as a library and repository of documents, the Institution approaches its centennial with a dual identity: an active public policy research center and an internationally recognized library and archives. The Institution’s overarching goals are to: » Understand the causes and consequences of economic, political, and social change » Analyze the effects of government actions and public policies » Use reasoned argument and intellectual rigor to generate ideas that nurture the formation of public policy and benefit society Herbert Hoover’s 1959 statement to the Board of Trustees of Stanford University continues to guide and define the Institution’s mission in the twenty-first century: This Institution supports the Constitution of the United States, its Bill of Rights, and its method of representative government. Both our social and economic sys- tems are based on private enterprise, from which springs initiative and ingenuity. Ours is a system where the Federal Government should undertake no govern- mental, social, or economic action, except where local government, or the people, cannot undertake it for themselves. The overall mission of this Institution is, from its records, to recall the voice of experience against the making of war, and by the study of these records and their publication to recall man’s endeavors to make and preserve peace, and to sustain for America the safeguards of the American way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Nagorno Karabakh Geo-Politics: Interests and Politics of Outsiders
    The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict. Causes of the conflict and obstacles to conflict resolution. Item Type Thesis Authors Nikkar-Esfahani, Hamidreza Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 27/09/2021 12:21:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/5650 University of Bradford eThesis This thesis is hosted in Bradford Scholars – The University of Bradford Open Access repository. Visit the repository for full metadata or to contact the repository team © University of Bradford. This work is licenced for reuse under a Creative Commons Licence. The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict Causes of the conflict and obstacles to conflict resolution Hamidreza Nikkar-Esfahani Department of Peace Studies University of Bradford Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2009 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments: ...................................................................................................... vii Common Abbreviations ............................................................................................. viii Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • The Soviet Plans for the North Western Theatre of Operations in 1939-1944
    FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES THE SOVIET PLANS FOR THE NORTH WESTERN THEATRE OF OPERATIONS IN 1939-1944 Ohto Manninen National Defence College Helsinki 2004 Finnish Defence Studies is published under the auspices of the National Defence College, and the contributions reflect the fields of research and teaching of the College. Finnish Defence Studies will occasionally feature documentation on Finnish Security Policy. Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily imply endorsement by the National Defence College. Editor: Pekka Sivonen Editorial Assistant: Harri Valtonen Editorial Board: Chairman Prof. Mikko Viitasalo, National Defence College Prof. Ohto Manninen, National Defence College Col. Erkki Nordberg, Defence Staff Dr. Kalevi Ruhala Dr. Col. (ret.) PekkaVisuri, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Dr. Matti Vuorio, Scientific Committee for National Defence Published by NATIONAL DEFENCE COLLEGE P.O. Box 7 SF-00861 Helsinki FINLAND FINNISH DEFENCE STUDIES 16 The Soviet Plans for the North Western Theatre of Operations in 1939-1944 Ohto Manninen National Defence College Helsinki 2004 ISBN 951-25-1476-1 ISSN 0788 5571 Edita Prima Oy Helsinki 2004 FOREWORD In this study my intention has been to analyse the operation plans made by the Red Army for the Finnish theatre of war in the eve of and during the Second World War. During my visits in Russia to research in the former Soviet archives it was not possible to see the origi- nal plans for operations. It was pointed out to me that the "ground level vegetation" is still the same in the border areas of Russia and Finland. This, of course, was a friendly way of saying to me that the legislation still forbids of giving those materials for researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland in Crisis: Finnish Relations with the Western Democracies
    Finland in Crisis: Finnish Relations with the Western Democracies, 1939-1941 by Mylon Ollila A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2012 © Mylon Ollila 2012 Author’s Declaration Page I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This thesis examines Finland’s relations with Britain and the United States from 1939- 1941. During this period, Finland engaged in two wars against the Soviet Union. In 1939-1940 Finland defended itself against a Soviet attack with the emotional and material support of Britain and the United States. By 1941 Finland was once again at war with the Soviet Union. The geopolitical situation had changed so significantly that Finland found itself aligned with Germany against the Soviet Union. Consequently Finnish relations with the western democracies were strained, although Britain and the United States had previously supported Finland against the Soviet Union. This thesis examines the differences in foreign policy and public opinion in Britain and the United States and the nature of their relations with Finland from 1939-1941. iii Acknowledgements This period of study at the University of Waterloo has been a valuable experience in my personal and professional development. My thesis supervisor, Alex Statiev, was the central influence in this development. I could not have hoped for a better mentor.
    [Show full text]