DOCSLIB.ORG

UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Decolonizing Being, Knowledge, and Power: Youth Activism in California at the Turn of the 21st Century Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g51b118 Author Banales, Samuel Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Decolonizing Being, Knowledge, and Power: Youth Activism in California at the Turn of the 21st Century By Samuel Bañales A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California at Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Charles L. Briggs, chair Professor Nancy Scheper-Hughes Professor Nelson Maldonado-Torres Fall 2012 Copyright © by Samuel Bañales 2012 ABSTRACT Decolonizing Being, Knowledge, and Power: Youth Activism in California at the Turn of the 21st Century by Samuel Bañales Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California at Berkeley Professor Charles L. Briggs, chair By focusing on the politics of age and (de)colonization, this dissertation underscores how the oppression of young people of color is systemic and central to society. Drawing upon decolonial thought, including U.S. Third World women of color, modernity/coloniality, decolonial feminisms, and decolonizing anthropology scholarship, this dissertation is grounded in the activism of youth of color in California at the turn of the 21st century across race, class, gender, sexuality, and age politics. I base my research on two interrelated, sequential youth movements that I argue were decolonizing: the various walkouts organized by Chican@ youth during the 1990s and the subsequent multi-ethnic "No on 21" movement (also known as the "youth movement") in 2000. Through an interdisciplinary activist ethnography, which includes speaking to and conducting interviews with many participants and organizers of these movements, participating in local youth activism in various capacities, and evaluating hundreds of articles—from mainstream media to "alternative" sources, like activist blogs, leftist presses, and high school newspapers—I contend that the youth of color activism that is examined here worked towards ontological, epistemological, and institutional decolonization. This study, which addresses negative social understandings about youth in general and young people of color specifically, highlights how the oppression of youth is systemic and central to modernity/coloniality, and calls attention to the necessity of incorporating age, power, and their theorization into the discourses on decolonization. Along with making youth's politics and political identities essential to the research, this dissertation aims to contribute to, not only knowledge production, but also the unfinished project of decolonization—which most literature on young people or youth activism has yet to do. 1 TABLE of CONTENTS Dedication and Acknowledgements ii Preface iii Notes on Terms Used ix Chapter One: The Politics of Age and the Unfinished Project of Decolonization 1 Chapter Two: Expanding Representations of Youth, Anthropology, and Decolonial Thought 20 Chapter Three: Youth Activism and the Decolonial Turn 45 Chapter Four: Youth Activism Decolonizing Being 71 Chapter Five: Youth Activism Decolonizing Knowledge 101 Chapter Six: Youth Activism Decolonizing Power 133 Chapter Seven: Towards a Transgenerational Consciousness 157 i DEDICATIONS and ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is dedicated to God-Ometeotl-Olodumare-Pachamama-Universe. I also dedicate this dissertation to those that came before me, to those in this lifetime, and to those yet to come. In particular, I dedicate this dissertation to those that participated in the decolonizing youth activism that I write about. I especially thank my graduate adviser, Professor Charles L. Briggs, who has helped me throughout this very long and arduous project, including the many turns and twists of my graduate school career. I also thank Professor Nancy Scheper-Hughes' valuable feedback and understanding. Last but not least, this dissertation would not have been possible were it not for the continuous guidance, feedback, and support from Nelson Maldonado-Torres, the third member of my committee. I am very much honored to have had three stellar activist-scholars serve as my dissertation committee. I also want to acknowledge significant people that played an important role in helping me complete my academic studies and navigate the often difficult path of higher education. People that assisted me with my intellectual, political, and/or personal growth include Silvia Suayfeta- Cortez, María Padilla, Lourdes Martínez-Echazábal, Francine Masiello, Lisa Sánchez, Laura E. Pérez, and Trinity A. Ordona. Many campus staff members, such as Francisca Cázares, Cassandra Hill, Ned Garret, Carla Trujillo, Lupe Gallegos-Díaz, Lisa Walker, Robert Jittrikawiphol, Elisa Huerta, Billy Curtis, and Lourdes Franco Martínez (que en paz descanse), were instrumental to completing my studies. I thank my family and friends for their love and support. Although there are too many to list here, I am particularly grateful for my mother Emma Bañales and my sister Vicky Bañales, as well as Claudia Peña, Pablo Villegas, and Sonia García. I want to also express my deep appreciation to the jotería of Young Queers United for Empowerment (¡YQUÉ!), which provided an amazing political, intellectual, and social community for over six years, especially with the members I developed close relationships. Organizing and working with other activist student groups, like Xinaxtli and MECHxA, was equally important. Also, I'm indebted to the activists that participated in my research project and/or in the movements this dissertation is based on. Finally, I also thank Dejanira Cruz, Vicky Bañales, Marcelle Maese-Cohen, Trexy Ching, Rahi Karnik, Gerardo Ayala, "Reina" Ángela Aguilar, and Felipe Flores for their feedback and assistance with the dissertation. Each of you contributed to my intellectual, political, and/or personal growth. Last of all, this dissertation would not have been possible without the intellectual and financial support of the Anthropology and Ethnic Studies Departments at UC Berkeley, the University of California Dissertation Fellowship, Graduate Division Summer Research Grants, Dean's Normative Time Research Fellowship, and the Ford Foundation Diversity Pre-Doctoral Fellowship. ii PREFACE In the early fall of 2008, I received an email from a staff member at UC Berkeley that works on diversity issues. Since I organize with the Queer Latin@ student group on campus, she asked me if it would be okay for her to give my contact information to a newly admitted graduate student that identified as a lesbian of color and was looking to make friends. Aware of the importance of building community across race and sexuality in the university, I welcomed the request. Via email, I got in touch with the graduate student and invited her to an upcoming campus event that would showcase the documentary video about the student group.1 It was an excellent idea since it highlighted why we joined the group, what we learned from being involved, and why the group was important to us in the context of the university. She said she would try and attend. The event took place in one of the underground rooms in the Moffitt library building during the evening. Other members of the group and I got there early in order to set up the audio-visual equipment and room. We were excited to see the video, not only because it was the first public screening of it, but also because many of the members would watch it for the first time. In respect of our ancestors and (indigenous) history of struggle, the event began with a spiritual blessing from an invited cultural leader from Oakland. With conch in one hand and flame in the other, she lit the sage before the intimate audience together honored the four directions, zenith and center: the cardinal points of a compass, and the sky and earth. After, she briefly explained the significance of the blessing to the audience and thanked the group for inviting her. I followed with a quick introduction about the importance of the video in the context of colonization: how, historically, same-sex eroticism existed in many indigenous societies in the Americas at the time of conquest, and how many indigenous people did not view sexual desire in the same ways as Europeans, did not categorize people in strictly binary terms, nor ascribed moral parameters like classifying acts as sinful/non-sinful.2 In other words, in contrast to how two-spirited identities across the Americas were often understood in positive terms,3 I pointed to the modern context where Queer Latin@s are generally demonized and perceived as inferior or perverted. I ended the introduction by mentioning how, through spoken word performance, personal and group interviews, and scenes from the 3rd annual Queer People of Color conference, the video was important for several reasons. Not only did the video document our hard work and struggles and place our existence on a map of (digital) knowledge, but also challenged the logic of colonization that has tried to convince us we are worthless. As the documentary screened, I felt a little nervous but validated—even empowered—to hear and see our voices on a big screen. After the documentary screened and the lights came on, I thanked the audience for attending and announced: "if anyone has questions about the group or the film, please talk with me or any of us," as I pointed to other members of the group in the audience. In between the shuffling of people as they left their seats to greet friends or exit the room, an unfamiliar face approached me. She introduced herself, followed by, "We've been in touch via email; you told me about the event." Despite being caught by surprise, I greeted her 1 So What! Young Queers United for Empowerment, produced Xamuel Bañales, (2008), film. 2 See Pete Sigal, ed., Infamous Desire: Male Homosexuality in Colonial Latin America, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Extensions of Remarks
    / 15988 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS May 4, 1972 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS MARIETTA, OKLA., YOUTH WINS NA­ adults work together as a team, as partners, still in the future were to make his words TIONAL ORATORICAL HONORS to accomplish those goals of a better to­ famous. He began his speech slowly with morrow. frequent emphasis on particular words. This Youth has much to contribute--un­ man, Abrahia.m Linooln, had not pro­ bridled energy, vitality, and enthusiasm that ceeded far into his famous address when he HON. CARL ALBERT is characteristic of those starting on some­ uttered the words "A House divided against OF OKLAHOMA thing new. A seemingly innate desire to be itself can not stand." And only three short IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES "a. part of the a.ction"-and the time to do years later, as if fulftll1ng a prophecy, the it-and finally ideals and dreams untar­ nation was plunged into a civil war. A civil Thursday, May 4, 1972 nished and undimmed by age. Yet those war that ripped and tore us asunder. Yet Mr. ALBERT. Mr. Speaker, a 17-year­ of you who come into day by day contact as a nation we survived. We survived be­ old constituent of mine, a resident of with young people or who follow their activi­ cause our country was built on a foundation Marietta, Okla., Mr. Donnie Paul Min­ ties in the news media are well aware that that was solid and sure. It was a foundation youthful energy and vitality can generate based on the idea that a government under yard, has won national honors in another destruction as well as enthusiasm-that de­ a.
    [Show full text]
  • International House Times
    INTERNATIONAL HOUSE Fall-Winter TIMES 2005 The Newsletter for Friends & Alumni of International House Jan Egeland is 2005 Alumnus of the Year Spring Gala is May 9, House Honors U.N. Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Rockefeller to Keynote 75th Anniversary Events teven C. Rockefeller, grandson of an Egeland, United Nations Under-Secretary- International House founder, John Alumni, residents, and friends are General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency D. Rockefeller, Jr., will give the celebrating I-House’s birthday at events JRelief Coordinator, was honored as International S keynote address at the 75th Anniversary planned throughout 2005-2006. For House Alumnus of the Year at an October luncheon Celebration and Awards Gala on May 9, upcoming events, send us your email held at the U.N. “Living in International House 2006. An emeritus professor of religion address on the RSVP panel on page 7 or was like living in the United Nations without the visit http://ihouse.berkeley.edu/alumni. at Middlebury College, he coordinated bureaucracy,” said Mr. Egeland. “Every single day led the drafting of the Earth Charter for the to new friendships with engaging students and scholars Earth Charter Commission and chairs the Sunday Supper from all over the world. My year as a Fulbright fellow Rockefeller Brothers Fund. June 11, 2005 at Berkeley, living in I-House, was my most liberating, Alumni and residents happiest and social year ever.” enjoyed a program The annual gala is the biggest fundraiser Jan Egeland (left) and 75th Anniversary featuring speakers of the year. For more information, Acknowledged worldwide for his passionate leadership Campaign Chair Peter Robertson at the from every decade.
    [Show full text]
  • “I Don't Care for My Other Books, Now”
    THE LIBRARY University of California, Berkeley | No. 29 Fall 2013 | lib.berkeley.edu/give Fiat Lux “I don’t care for my other books, now” MARK TWAIN’S AUTOBIOGRAPHY CONTINUED by Benjamin Griffin, Mark Twain Project, Bancroft Library Mark Twain’s complete, uncensored Autobiography was an instant bestseller when the first volume was published in 2010, on the centennial of the author’s death, as he requested. The eagerly-awaited Volume 2 delves deeper into Twain’s life, uncovering the many roles he played in his private and public worlds. Affectionate and scathing by turns, his intractable curiosity and candor are everywhere on view. Like its predecessor, Volume 2 mingles a dia- ry-like record of Mark Twain’s daily thoughts and doings with fragmented and pungent portraits of his earlier life. And, as before, anything which Mark Twain had written but hadn’t, as of 1906–7, found a place to publish yet, might go in: Other autobiographies patiently and dutifully“ follow a planned and undivergent course through gardens and deserts and interesting cities and dreary solitudes, and when at last they reach their appointed goal they are pretty tired—and they The one-hundred-year edition comprises what have been frequently tired during the journey, too. could be called a director’s cut, says editor Ben But this is not that kind of autobiography. This one Griffin. “It hasn’t been cut to size or made to fit is only a pleasure excursion. the requirements of the market or brought into ” continued on page 6-7 line with notions of public decency.
    [Show full text]
  • U C Berkeley 2009-2019 Capital Financial Plan
    U C BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN NOVEMBER 2009 UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN CONTENTS Preface Executive Overview 1 Goals & Priorities 3 Life Safety 4 Campus Growth & New Initiatives 6 Intellectual Community 8 Campus Environment 9 Capital Renewal 10 Operation & Maintenance 11 Sustainable Campus 12 Capital Approval Process 15 Capital Resources 17 State Funds 19 Gift Funds 21 Campus Funds 22 Capital Program 2009-2019 25 Project Details 35 UC BERKELEY 2009-2019 CAPITAL FINANCIAL PLAN PREFACE In March 2008, The Regents authorized the ‘pilot phase’ of a major reconfiguration of the capital projects approval process: the pilot phase would entail an initial test of the redesign in order to examine its logistics and impacts, prior to full implementation. In general, the new process would delegate much more authority to the campus for project approval, and would limit project-specific review by The Regents to very large and complex projects. Each campus would prepare a set of ‘framework’ plans that outline its capital investment strategy and physical design approach. Once those plans are approved by The Regents, then as long as a project meets certain thresholds, and conforms to the framework plans, it could be approved by the Chancellor, subject to a 15 day review by OP. One of these thresholds is dollar value: the currently proposed figure is $60 million or less. The framework plans for Berkeley include 3 documents: • The 2020 Long Range Development Plan provides a land use policy framework, within which projects can be prioritized and planned.
    [Show full text]
  • What We Know About Engendering Civic Identity
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Civic Engagement Special Topics in Service Learning 3-1997 What We Know About Engendering Civic Identity James Youniss The Catholic University of America Jeffrey A. McLellan The Catholic University of America Miranda Yates Brown University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceciviceng Part of the Service Learning Commons Recommended Citation Youniss, James; McLellan, Jeffrey A.; and Yates, Miranda, "What We Know About Engendering Civic Identity" (1997). Civic Engagement. 35. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceciviceng/35 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Topics in Service Learning at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Civic Engagement by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What we know about engendering civic identity James Youniss; Jeffrey A McLellan; Miranda Yates The American Behavioral Scientist; Mar/Apr 1997; 40, 5; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 620 What We Know About Engendering Civic Identity JAMES YOUNISS JEFFREY A. McLELLAN Catholic University ofAmerica MIRANDA YATES Brown University Taking the position that there is a developmental process in the formation of citizenship, the authors reviewed studies that reported a link between youth's participation in organized activities and civic behaviors 15 or more years later in adulthood. Data uniformly showed that students who participated in high school government or community service projects, meant in the broad sense, are more likely to vote and to join community organizations than are adults who were nonparticipants during high school. Results support the authors' view that participation during the youth era can be seminal in the construction of civic identity that includes a sense of agency and social responsibility in sustaining the community's well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Adjustments to 2020-21 Capital Outlay Proposal
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE • SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT— OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 1111 Franklin Street, 6th Floor Oakland, California 94607-5200 510/987-9029 April 7, 2020 The Honorable Holly J. Mitchell Chair, Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 The Honorable Phil Ting Chair, Assembly Committee on Budget State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Ms. Keely Bosler Director of Finance State Capitol, Room 1145 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Senator Mitchell, Assembly Member Ting, and Director Bosler: On August 30, 2019 in accordance with Sections 92493 through 92496 of the Education Code, the University of California submitted for your review and approval the University’s 2020-21 State Capital Outlay proposal totaling $551.4 million. UC submitted detailed information on the proposal’s $300 million 2020-21 UC State Seismic Program on January 13, 2020. Based on these submissions the Department of Finance issued a preliminary approval for UC’s State Capital Outlay proposal on February 14, 2020. With Public Preschool, K-12, and College Health and Safety Bond Act of 2020 (Proposition 13) not passing, the University is requesting some adjustments to its 2020-21 State Capital Outlay proposal. As originally proposed, the $80 million 2020-21 Planning for Future State Capital Outlay program would fund preliminary plans for critical high priority State-eligible major capital projects. With the exception of the San Diego campus’ Revelle College Seismic project, these projects relied on funding from Proposition 13. Accordingly, the University is proposing the revisions to the 2020-21 State Capital Outlay proposal as discussed as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 1965 an Analytic and Autobiographical Account (2008)
    one Spring 1965 An Analytic and Autobiographical Account (2008) in january 1965, in the wake of the turbulent Free Speech Movement on the Berkeley campus and the demise of its chancellor, Edward Strong, the new acting chancellor, Martin Meyerson, asked me to join his staff as a special assistant in the area of student political activity. This was the hottest seat in the chancellor’s offi ce at that moment, given the political fragility of the campus. I served eight months in that capacity until a new chancellor, Roger Heyns, was appointed and I took a scheduled sabbatical leave. Those months were a tense and uncertain period that resulted in an unsteady but palpable restoration of authority on the Berkeley campus and a few steps toward campus “normalcy.” They also constituted a period of rapid and mandatory political learning on my part and one of the most demanding seasons of my life. Over the years many colleagues have asked me to write about this important transitional period, both because it has received less attention than the historic Free Speech Movement days of late 1964 and because I had an “insider’s” point of view; now, in 2008, I have fi nally acceded to those requests. I have returned to the archives of the chancellor’s offi ce, to accounts of the events in the press, and to my personal recollections. The staff of the Bancroft Library were very helpful in supplying materials relevant to the Meyerson administration from the fi les of the chancellor’s offi ce. I also benefi ted from the research assistance of Ziza Delgado and Catherine Shepard-Haier.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Commission on the Future of the UC Berkeley Library
    Report of the Commission on the Future of the UC Berkeley Library October 2013 Acknowledgements The Commission would like to thank those who graciously contributed their time, expertise, and insight toward making this report complete. We are especially grateful to the experts who participated in our March 1 symposium, “The University Library in the 21st Century:” • Robert Darnton, Director of the Harvard University Library. • Peter Jerram, Chief Executive Officer, PLoS. • Tom Leonard, University Librarian. • Peter Norvig, Director of Research, Google. • Pamela Samuelson, Richard M. Sherman Distinguished Professor of Law and Information; Co-Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology. • Kevin Starr, California State Librarian Emeritus. We would also like to thank the UC Berkeley administrators who spent a great deal of time answering questions from the Commission, particularly Tom Leonard, University Librarian; Beth Dupuis, Associate University Librarian; Bernie Hurley, Associate University Librarian; Elise Woods, Library CFO; Erin Gore, Associate Vice Chancellor and Campus CFO; and Laurent Heller, Budget Director. From the California Digital Library, Executive Director Laine Farley and Director of Collection Development Ivy Anderson generously spent time with the Commission to explain the economics of licensing resources for the University of California system. We are grateful to the Graduate Assembly, the ASUC, the participants in Spring 2013 DeCal course “Student Commission on the Future of the Library,” and especially Natalie Gavello for their sustained and thoughtful communications with us throughout this process regarding the students’ perspectives on the Library. Other groups that lent their time and expertise toward shaping this report include the Academic Senate Library Committee, the Executive Committee of the Librarians’ Association of the University of California – Berkeley, and the Library Advisory Board.
    [Show full text]
  • E Pluribus Unum: the Berkeley Free Speech Movement of 1964 Madeleine Riskin-Kutz
    E pluribus unum: The Berkeley Free Speech Movement of 1964 Madeleine Riskin-Kutz Free Speech Movement march through Sather Gate, Mona Hutchin on the extreme right (marchers’ perspective) and Mario Savio on the extreme left. From Warshaw p.56, photo credit: Ron Enfield, Nov. 20, 1964 Madeleine R-K, E pluribus unum, cont. During the academic year of 1964-65, a political movement took place at the University of California (UC), Berkeley bringing together students and faculty from across the political spectrum — from communists to campaigners for right-wing Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater. Members of the movement united in their demand for free speech on campus and specifically, to be allowed to set up tables on campus to campaign for political causes. Their movement took place through demonstrations and sit-ins, ultimately achieving success in December 1964, when the academic senate voted unanimously to approve a resolution that there would henceforth be no restrictions on the content of speech or political advocacy on campus, except in regard to time, place and manner. Histories of the Free Speech Movement (FSM) have represented it as left wing and have therefore overlooked one of its essential features: it was a broad coalition operating largely by consensus among people with widely differing political views. By restoring the center-to-right wing side of the history of the FSM, we can first of all recognize this broad coalition’s existence, then also understand it was possible because of a form of universalism among students. A universal principle united the members of the Free Speech Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • 8804110 the Free Speech Movement: a Case Study In
    8804110 THE FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT: A CASE STUDY IN THE RHETORIC OF SOCIAL INTERVENTION Stoner, Mark Reed, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1987 © 1987 Stoner, Mark Reed All rights reserved 300 N. ZeebRd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or pages_____ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or_______ print 3. Photographs with dark background_____ 4. Illustrations are poor copy_______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy ^ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides_______ of page 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several________ pages 8. Print exceeds margin requirements______ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost_______ in spine 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct_______ print 11. Page(s) ____________lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s)____________seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages______ 15. Dissertation contains pages with print at a slant, filmed as received__________ 16. Other____________________________________________________________________________ UMI THE FREE SPEECH MOVEMENT: A CASE STUDY IN THE RHETORIC OF SOCIAL INTERVENTION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Mark Reed Stoner, B.S., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1987 Dissertation Committee: Approved By John J. Makay William R. Brown / Adviser James L. Golden department of Comrrtlmication Copyr ight © by Mark Reed Stoner 1987 To My Wife, Daria, and my Children, Ian and Heather Whose Encouragement, Love and Support Made This Project Possible i i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the invaluable help o£ my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Acknowledgments, Donor Stewardship, University Relations, UC Berkeley
    Sample Acknowledgments, Donor Stewardship, University Relations, UC Berkeley The Chancellor’s acknowledgement program responds to outright gifts and pledges of $25,000+ and pledge payments of $100,000+. MENU: 1. Menu 2. Hewlett Chair & new Builders of Berkeley donors 3. Fellowship (named fellowship fund) 4. Incentive Awards Program (large-scale scholarship program) 5. Scholarship/Condolence (named scholarship fund) 6. Cal Fund (campuswide unrestricted giving) 7. Class gift for Sather Gate renovation (reunion class project) 8. multi-interest donor with various designations 9. Law school (unit-specific unrestricted giving) 10. Engineering school (unit-specific unrestricted giving) 11. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (specific research project) 12. Library (capital project) 13. College of Letters & Science (division designation) (anonymity) 14. Pacific Film Archive & BAM/PFA new building update (capital project) 15. Cal Performances (performance sponsorship) 16. Athletics (multiple sports) Dear Mr. Marver: It is my great pleasure to acknowledge your magnificent Hewlett-matched pledge to the University, and to the Graduate School of Public Policy in particular. This exceptional philanthropic commitment perfectly reflects your steadfast devotion to the school. Thank you so much for establishing the James D. Marver Chair in Public Policy, which, I understand, will support the work of a distinguished faculty member doing research in the area of early childhood education policy. Thank you, too, for your years of service on the GSPP Advisory Board, with particular thanks for agreeing this year to serve as chair. I also would like to welcome you to your new status as a Builder of Berkeley. Builders are a special group of historic and current donors whose lifetime giving totals $1 million or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit-Berkeley-Official-Visitors-Guide
    Contents 3 Welcome 4 Be a Little Berkeley 6 Accommodations 16 Restaurants 30 Local Libations 40 Arts & Culture 46 Things to Do 52 Shopping Districts 64 #VisitBerkeley 66 Outdoor Adventures & Sports 68 Berkeley Marina 70 Architecture 72 Meetings & Celebrations 76 UC Berkeley 78 Travel Information 80 Transportation 81 Visitor & Community Services 82 Maps visitberkeley.com BERKELEY WELCOMES YOU! The 2018/19 Official Berkeley Visitors Guide is published by: Hello, Visit Berkeley, 2030 Addison St., Suite #102, Berkeley, CA 94704 (510) 549-7040 • www.visitberkeley.com Berkeley is an iconic American city, richly diverse with a vibrant economy inspired in EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE great measure by our progressive environ- Greg Mauldin, Chairman of the Board;General Manager, Hotel Shattuck Plaza Vice Chair, (TBA); mental and social policies. We are internationally recognized for our arts Thomas Burcham, Esq., Secretary/Treasurer; Worldwide Farmers and culinary scenes, as well as serving as home to the top public univer- Barbara Hillman, President & CEO, Visit Berkeley sity in the country – the University of California, Berkeley. UC Berkeley BOARD OF DIRECTORS is the heart of our city, and our neighborhood districts surround the Cal John Pimentel, Account Exec/Special Projects, Hornblower Cruises & Events campus with acclaimed restaurants, great independent shops and galleries, Lisa Bullwinkel, Owner; Another Bullwinkel Show world-class performing arts venues, and wonderful parks. Tracy Dean, Owner; Design Site Hal Leonard, General Manager; DoubleTree by Hilton Berkeley Marina I encourage you to discover Berkeley’s signature elements, events and Matthew Mooney, General Manager, La Quinta Inn & Suites LaDawn Duvall, Executive Director, Visitor & Parent Services UC Berkeley engaging vibe during your stay with us.
    [Show full text]