The Mineral Industries of the Commonwealth of Independent States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mineral Industries of the Commonwealth of Independent States THE MINERAL INDUSTRIES OF ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN, BELARUS, GEORGIA, KAZAKHSTAN, KYRGYZSTAN, MOLDOVA, RUSSIA, TAJIKISTAN, TURKMENISTAN, UKRAINE, AND UZBEKISTAN By Richard M. Levine and Glenn J. Wallace The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) was created Armenia had a large industrial minerals industry and was the in December 1991 by republics of the former Soviet Union largest producer of perlite in the FSU. It produced a number of (FSU). In the adopted declaration, the participants of the other industrial minerals, including clays, diatomite, dimension Commonwealth declared that their interaction would be based stone, limestone, salt, and semiprecious stones, and had a on the principles that all member states have sovereign equality diamond-cutting industry. Armenia, however, had practically and are independent and equal subjects under international law. no mineral fuel production. The CIS is not a state and it does not have supranational powers Azerbaijan’s most significant reserves in terms of value were (Executive Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent its oil reserves located offshore in the Caspian Sea. A large States, 2001, Commonwealth of Independent States, accessed number of major foreign firms were involved in projects to June 25, 2001, at URL http://www.cis.minsk.by/english/ develop these reserves. Azerbaijan was also a producer of engl_cis.html). In 2000, the members of the CIS were Armenia, alunite, alumina, aluminum, copper-molybdenum ore, iron ore, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and lead-zinc ore. The country produced many industrial Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and minerals, the most important being bromine, clays, gypsum, Uzbekistan. iodine, limestone, marble, sand and gravel, decorative building In September 1993, the CIS states signed an agreement on the stone, and precious and semiprecious stones. creation of an economic union “to form common economic Georgia had been a major producer of manganese from the space grounded on free movement of goods, services, labor Chiatura deposit during the Soviet period, but production force, capital; to elaborate coordinated monetary, tax, price, subsequently had fallen precipitously. The manganese was used customs, external economic policy; to bring together methods of domestically for ferroalloy production at the Zestafoni regulating economic activity and create favorable conditions for ferroalloys plant. A small amount of iron ore also was mined, the development of direct production relations” (Interstate and the Madneuli complex, a copper-barite polymetallic deposit, Statistical Committee of the Commonwealth of Independent was exploited for barite, copper, and a range of byproduct States, [undated], About Commonwealth of Independent States, minerals that included gold and silver. Lead and zinc were accessed June 25, 2000, at URL http://www.cisstat.com/eng/ mined at the Kvaisi lead-zinc deposit, and arsenic was mined cis.htm). from the Lukhumi and the Tsansa deposits. The steel mill in In 2000, all the countries of the CIS reported an increase (in Rustavi had the capacity to produce 1.4 million metric tons per constant prices) in their gross domestic products (GDP) and in year (Mt/yr) of crude steel as well as the capacity to produce industrial output in comparison with those of 1999, with the coke, pig iron, sinter, rolled products, and tubes and pipes exception of Turkmenistan for which there was no reporting (Metal Bulletin Books Ltd., 1997, p. 131). (table 3). Georgia produced a range of industrial minerals that included bentonite, diatomite, talc, and zeolites and also mined Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkmenistan semiprecious stones. Decorative stones for use as building (Caucasus and Caspian Littoral Countries ) materials were mined at more than 100 deposits (Georgian Investment Center, 1998, Overview of the economic sectors of The countries of this region were producers of a number of Georgia—Mining, accessed July 2, 1998, at URL metallic and industrial minerals. Armenia had been mining one- http://www.georgia.net.ge/gic/Sector/Mining.HTM). Many clay third of the FSU’s output of molybdenum. It also mined deposits as well as high-quality quartz sand and sand and gravel copper, copper-zinc, and native gold deposits. Significant deposits also were developed for the production of bricks and byproduct constituents in the country’s nonferrous ores include ceramic products. The country produced some coal and crude barite, gold, lead, rhenium, selenium, silver, tellurium, and zinc. oil and had an oil refinery at Batumi. Extraction of natural gas THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES—2000 3.1 ceased in 1997. resources. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Turkmenistan was a leading producer of natural gas, and establishment of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Russia, and more than 90% of foreign direct investment went into the Turkmenistan as independent states, the question of ownership country’s oil and natural gas sectors. Investment, however, has and development rights in the sea has remained unresolved. No slowed in the past few years owing to the restrictive conditions agreed-upon convention exits that delineates the littoral states’ that Turkmenistan has attached to foreign investment. ownership of the sea’s resources or their development rights. Turkmenistan, however, was moving to attract additional Several conflicts have arisen over claims to regions of the sea. foreign investment in order to develop its vast oil and gas Disputes exist concerning whether the resources in the Caspian resources (U.S. Energy Information Administration, June 2001, should be shared in common by all littoral states or if the Country analysis briefs—Turkmenistan, accessed October 25, Caspian Sea should be divided into national sectors. 2001, at URL http://www.eia.doe/gov/emu/cabs/turkmen.html). Negotiations between the littoral states have made slow Turkmenistan has a wide variety of industrial mineral progress resolving differences. Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and resources, which include bromine, iodine, salt, sodium sulfate, Russia had agreed on dividing the sea by a “modified median” and sulfur. The Garabogaz Aylagy lagoon off the Caspian Sea principle, Iran had insisted on an equal division of the sea, and was one of the world’s largest sources of raw materials for the Turkmenistan’s position was evolving. chemical industry; commercial interest in the salts of this region Division into national sectors has been the de facto solution. began at the end of the 19th century (Weisman and McIlveen, However, disputes have arisen over the delineation of these 1983, p. 1214-1215). Production from the Garabogaz Aylagy national sectors. For example, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan had accounted for almost 45% of the FSU’s sodium sulfate are disputing ownership of a field called Serdar by production and all of its production of epsomite and medicinal Turkmenistan and Kyapaz by Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan protested Glauber’s salt (Aganbegyan and Ovezgel’byev, 1998, p. 97). Iran’s decision to award Royal Dutch/Shell Group and Lasmo The countries of the Caspian Sea region were of greatest Oil Ltd. a license to conduct seismic surveys in a region that importance to world energy markets owing to the large oil and Azerbaijan considers part of its territory. Turkmenistan claims gas reserves in this region that were beginning to be fully that portions of the Azeri and Chirag fields, which Azerbaijan developed. These resources have created competition between calls Khazar and Osman, respectively, lie within its territorial countries concerning their ownership, among companies to get waters rather than Azerbaijan’s. Turkmenistan, furthermore, development rights, and among countries to establish export has insisted that development of the Azeri and Chirag fields, routes. The area of the Caspian Sea, which was bordered by which is being carried out by Azerbaijan International four CIS states (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Operating Co. (AIOC), be stopped. Russia) and Iran, was developing into a significant oil- and gas- Nevertheless, countries are engaged in active exploration and exporting area. The Caucasus countries of the CIS (Armenia, development programs in what they considered to be their Azerbaijan, and Georgia) were potentially major world oil sectors of the Caspian Sea. Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, in transport centers. Proven oil reserves for the entire Caspian Sea particular, in conjunction with foreign firms, have made region [estimated to be between 18 billion barrels (Gbbl) and 35 progress in offshore oil development. Gbbl] were comparable with those of the United States (22 Another major area of controversy that has significant Gbbl) and greater than those in the North Sea (17 Gbbl)]; economic, environmental, and geopolitical ramifications undiscovered oil resources could yield another 235 Gbbl of oil. involves the proposed routing of pipelines to export The majority of Azerbaijan’s oil resources are offshore, and hydrocarbons from this region. The issues involved the degree apparently 30% to 40% of Kazakhstan’s and Turkmenistan’s that Russia should control export routes by having them pass total oil resources also are offshore (U.S. Energy Information through its territory, the intent of countries to avoid routing Administration, August 2000, World energy areas to watch, pipelines through such potentially unfriendly countries as Iran accessed August 3, 2001, at URL http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/
Recommended publications
  • Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Cryptinae)
    © Biologiezentrum Linz, download www.zobodat.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 47/1 749-896 31.7.2015 Zur Kenntnis paläarktischer Cryptus-Arten (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Cryptinae) Martin SCHWARZ A b s t r a c t : Contribution to the knowledge of Palaearctic species of Cryptus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Cryptinae). In this paper additions to the revision of the western Palaearctic species of the genus Cryptus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Cryptinae) by ROSSEM (1969) are given. In addition the Cryptus species from Central Asia and from Mongolia are revised. New keys to the species occuring in the western Palaearctic region and in Central Asia as well as in Mongolia are provided. For most species new localities are listed. The following new species are described: Cryptus adversus nov.sp. (Kazakhstan), Cryptus borderai nov.sp. (Spain, Italy), Cryptus dentipropodealis nov.sp. (Portugal, Spain, Italy, Macedonia, Greece, Lebanon, Morocco), Cryptus duoalbimaculatus nov.sp. (Iran, Turkmenistan, Egypt), Cryptus infinitus nov.sp. (Mongolia), Cryptus informis nov.sp. (Greece, Iran), Cryptus laticlypeatus nov.sp. (Turkey, Tajikistan), Cryptus lobicaudatus nov.sp. (Jordan), Cryptus ludibundus nov.sp. (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan), Cryptus magniloquus nov.sp. (Russia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia), Cryptus mandschui nov.sp. (Mongolia), Cryptus meditatus nov.sp. (Tadshikistan), Cryptus memorandus nov.sp. (Mongolia), Cryptus meticulosus nov.sp. (Mongolia), Cryptus notaulicus nov.sp. (Turkey), Cryptus schenkioides nov.sp. (Turkey), Cryptus spissus nov.sp. (Turkey), Cryptus transversistriatus nov.sp. (Kyrgyzstan), Cryptus turbidus nov.sp. (Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia), Cryptus valesiacus nov.sp. (Switzerland), C. vicinalis nov.sp. (Mongolia) and Cryptus vitreifrontalis nov.sp. (Turkey, ?Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran). For Itamoplex indicum JONATHAN 2000, which is preoccupied in Cryptus, a new name (Cryptus albidentatus nom.nov.) is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Russia in 2010
    2010 Minerals Yearbook RUSSIA U.S. Department of the Interior October 2012 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Elena Safirova Russia was one of the world’s leading mineral-producing Of Russia’s total spending on geologic prospecting, 80.8% countries. In 2010, Russia was ranked among the world’s went into exploration for oil and gas, 9% into exploration for leading producers or was a leading regional producer of such precious metals, and 1.9% into exploration for diamond. In mineral commodities as aluminum, arsenic, asbestos, bauxite, terms of the sources of financing, 70.4% of exploration spending boron, cadmium, cement, coal, cobalt, copper, diamond, was financed by the mineral industry, 16.7% came from fluorspar, gold, iron ore, lime, magnesium compounds and domestic and foreign investors, and 8.2% was contributed from metals, mica (flake, scrap, and sheet), natural gas, nickel, the Federal budget (Federal’naya Sluzhba Gosudarstvennoy nitrogen, oil shale, palladium, peat, petroleum, phosphate, pig Statistiki, 2011b). iron, platinum, potash, rhenium, silicon, steel, sulfur, titanium sponge, tungsten, and vanadium (Angulo, 2012; Apodaca; Government Policies and Programs 2012a–c; Bray, 2012a, b; Brooks, 2012; Corathers, 2012; Edelstein, 2012; Fenton, 2012; Gambogi, 2012; George, In 2009, the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia 2012; Jasinski, 2012a, b; Jorgenson, 2012; Kramer, 2012a, b; announced a new program “Strategy for Development of the Kuck, 2012; Loferski, 2012; Miller, 2012a, b; Olson, 2012; Metallurgical Industry for the Period through 2020.” The Polyak, 2012a, b; Shedd, 2012a, b; Tolcin, 2012; van Oss, 2012; new strategy emphasizes metallurgy as one of the sectors of Virta, 2012; Willett, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Uzbekistan: Tashkent Province Sewerage Improvement Project
    Initial Environmental Examination May 2021 Uzbekistan: Tashkent Province Sewerage Improvement Project Prepared by the Joint Stock Companies “Uzsuvtaminot” for the Asian Development Bank. ..Þ,zýUçâÛ,ÜINÞâ'' .,UzSUVTAMINoT" »KSIYADORLIK J°¼IY»ÂI JoINT ýâÞáÚ áÞÜà°ItÓr 1¾¾¾35, O'zbekiston Respublikasi l0OO35, Republic of Uzbekistan Toshkent shahri, Niyozbek yo'li ko'chasi 1-çã Tashkent ciý, Niyozbek 5ruli stÛÕÕt 1 apt. telefon: +998 55 5Þ3 l2 55 telephone: +998 55 503 12 55 uzst14,exat.uz, infcl(rtluzsuv. çz æzst{o exat. uz, iÛ[Þ(Ð æzsçç, æz _ 2 Ñ 1,1AÙ 202l Nq 4l2L 1 4 2 Ò ÂÞ: ¼r. Jung ½Þ ºim Project Officer SÕßiÞr UrÌÐß Development Specialist ÁÕßtrÐl and West Asia DÕàÐÓtmÕßt UrÌÐß Development and Water Division °siÐß Development ²Ðßk Subject: Project 52045-001 Tashkent ÀrÞçißáÕ Sewerage lmprovement Project - Revised lnitial Environmental Examination Dear ¼r. Kim, We hÕrÕÌà endorse the final revised and updated version of the lnitial µßvirÞßmÕßtÐl Examination (lEE) àrÕàÐrÕd fÞr the Tashkent ÀrÞçißáÕ Sewerage lmprovement ÀrÞjÕát. The lEE has ÌÕÕß discussed and reviewed Ìã the Projecls Coordination Unit ußdÕr JSc "UZSUVTAMlNoT". We ÕßSçrÕ, that the lEE will ÌÕ posted Þß the website of the JSC "UZSUVTAMlNoT" to ÌÕ available to the project affected àÕÞà|Õ, the printed áÞàã will also ÌÕ delivered to Ñ hokimiyats for disclosure to the local people. FuÓthÕr, hereby we submit the lEE to ADB for disclosure Þß the ÔD² website. Sincerely, Rusta janov Deputy irman of the Board CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 May 2021) Currency unit – Uzbekistan Sum (SUM)
    [Show full text]
  • DISCOVER URAL Ekaterinburg, 22 Vokzalnaya Irbit, 2 Proletarskaya Street Sysert, 51, Bykova St
    Alapayevsk Kamyshlov Sysert Ski resort ‘Gora Belaya’ The history of Kamyshlov is an The only porcelain In winter ‘Gora Belaya’ becomes one of the best skiing Alapayevsk, one of the old town, interesting by works in the Urals, resort holidays in Russia – either in the quality of its ski oldest metallurgical its merchants’ houses, whose exclusive faience runs, the service quality or the variety of facilities on centres of the region, which are preserved until iconostases decorate offer. You can rent cross-country skis, you can skate or dozens of churches around where the most do snowtubing, you can visit a swimming-pool or do rope- honorable industrial nowadays. The main sight the world, is a most valid building of the Middle 26 of Kamyshlov is two-floored 35 reason to visit the town of 44 climbing park. In summer there is a range of active sports Urals stands today, is Pokrovsky cathedral Sysert. You can go to the to do – carting, bicycling and paintball. You can also take inseparably connected (1821), founded in honor works with an excursion and the lifter to the top of Belaya Mountain. with the names of many of victory over Napoleon’s try your hand at painting 180 km from Ekaterinburg, 1Р-352 Highway faience pieces. You can also extend your visit with memorial great people. The elegant Trinity Church was reconstructed army. Every august the jazz festival UralTerraJazz, one of the through the settlement of Uraletz by the direction by the renowned architect M.P. Malakhov, and its burial places of industrial history – the dam and the workshop 53 top-10 most popular open-air fests in Russia, takes place in sign ‘Gora Belaya’ + 7 (3435) 48-56-19, gorabelaya.ru vaults serve as a shelter for the Romanov Princes – the Kamyshlov.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals After the Crisis: Results of 2011
    Global Expansion of Russian Multinationals after the Crisis: Results of 2011 Report dated April 16, 2013 Moscow and New York, April 16, 2013 The Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC), a joint center of Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the results of their third survey of Russian multinationals today.1 The survey, conducted from November 2012 to February 2013, is part of a long-term study of the global expansion of emerging market non-financial multinational enterprises (MNEs).2 The present report covers the period 2009-2011. Highlights Russia is one of the leading emerging markets in terms of outward foreign direct investments (FDI). Such a position is supported not by several multinational giants but by dozens of Russian MNEs in various industries. Foreign assets of the top 20 Russian non-financial MNEs grew every year covered by this report and reached US$ 111 billion at the end of 2011 (Table 1). Large Russian exporters usually use FDI in support of their foreign activities. As a result, oil and gas and steel companies with considerable exports are among the leading Russian MNEs. However, representatives of other industries also have significant foreign assets. Many companies remained “regional” MNEs. As a result, more than 66% of the ranked companies’ foreign assets were in Europe and Central Asia, with 28% in former republics of the Soviet Union (Annex table 2). Due to the popularity of off-shore jurisdictions to Russian MNEs, some Caribbean islands and Cyprus attracted many Russian subsidiaries with low levels of foreign assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Business & Human Rights Resource Centre Berlin, 22 Januar 2019 Dear
    UZBEK-GERMAN FORUM FOR HUMAN RIGHTS E.V. Oppelner str. 48-49 10997 Berlin +49 (0)176 3120 2474 [email protected] www.uzbekgermanforum.org Business & Human Rights Resource Centre Berlin, 22 Januar 2019 Dear Ms Skybenko, On behalf of the Uzbek-German Forum for Human Rights (UGF), I am writing to draw your attention to the systemic use of forced labour by the Uzbek-Spanish joint ventures Maxam-Chirchiq and Ammofos- Maxam, located respectively in the cities of Chirchiq and Almalyk in the Tashkent region of Uzbekistan. Every year, employees from Maxam-Chirchiq and Ammofos-Maxam are forcibly sent to pick cotton for up to two months during the harvest. This often involves living and working in inappropriate conditions, away from their families, with inadequate food, water and sanitary facilities. Employees risk dismissal from their jobs for refusal to pick cotton and many who speak to journalists and human rights activists are unwilling to reveal their names for fear of reprisals by their employers. Our research has found that forced labour at Maxam-Chirchiq and Ammofos-Maxam is not limited to picking cotton. In the summer of 2018, 120 employees of Maxam-Chirchiq were forced to go to the city of Akhangaran every day (located 82 km from Chirchiq) to work on demolishing buildings and clearing construction waste. Employees of Maxam-Chirchiq and Ammofos-Maxam have been forcibly mobilised to harvest cotton every autumn for many years under orders of the Government of Uzbekistan. We are aware of two deaths of employees of Maxam-Chirchiq and Ammofos-Maxam related to work in the cotton fields during the harvests of 2014 and 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Personnel - Conflict of Interest: Clements, William” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 37, folder “Personnel - Conflict of Interest: Clements, William” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 37 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library MEMORANDUM NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVELY June 10, 1975 CONFIDENTIAL MEMORANDUM FOR GENERAL SCOWCROFT FROM: Mr. Clift ~......-- SUBJECT: Status of NSSM 214: "Implications of US Participation in Siberian Development" Attached is a copy of the interagency response to NSSM 214. All agencies except Defense have concurred with the principal conclusions of the response, though several have suggested minor revisions. With regard to Defense, we understand that someone at a high level (we think Deputy Secretary Clements) objected to the conclusions of the study and thereby caused the delay in the Defense response. Subsequently his objections have been overcome and the response is now on its way back through Defense channels for official concurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • William R. Spiegelberger the Foreign Policy Research Institute Thanks the Carnegie Corporation for Its Support of the Russia Political Economy Project
    Russia Political Economy Project William R. Spiegelberger The Foreign Policy Research Institute thanks the Carnegie Corporation for its support of the Russia Political Economy Project. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Author: William R. Spiegelberger Eurasia Program Leadership Director: Chris Miller Deputy Director: Maia Otarashvili Edited by: Thomas J. Shattuck Designed by: Natalia Kopytnik © 2019 by the Foreign Policy Research Institute April 2019 COVER: Designed by Natalia Kopytnik. Photography: Oleg Deripaska (World Economic Forum); St. Basil’s Cathedral (Adob Stock); Ruble (Adobe Stock); Vladimir Putin (kremlin.ru); Rusal logo (rusal.ru); United States Capitol (Adobe Stock; Viktor Vekselberg (Aleshru/Wikimedia Commons); Alumnium rolls (Adobe Stock); Trade War (Adobe Stock). Our Mission The Foreign Policy Research Institute is dedicated to bringing the insights of scholarship to bear on the foreign policy and national security challenges facing the United States. It seeks to educate the public, teach teachers, train students, and offer ideas to advance U.S. national interests based on a nonpartisan, geopolitical perspective that illuminates contemporary international affairs through the lens of history, geography, and culture. Offering Ideas In an increasingly polarized world, we pride ourselves on our tradition of nonpartisan scholarship. We count among our ranks over 100 affiliated scholars located throughout the nation and the world who appear regularly in national and international media, testify on Capitol Hill, and are consulted by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Radiation and Nuclear Disasters in the Former USSR
    History of radiation and nuclear disasters in the former USSR M.V.Malko Institute of Power Engineering National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Akademicheskaya Str.15, Minsk, 220 000, Republic of Belarus E-mail: [email protected] Abstracts. The report describes the history of radiation and nuclear accidents in the former USSR. These accidents accompanied development of military and civilian use of nuclear energy. Some of them as testing of the first Soviet nuclear, Kyshtym radiation accident, radiation contamination of the Karachai lake and the Techa river, nuclear accidents at the Soviet submarine on August 10, 1985 in the Chazhma Bay (near Vladivostok) as well as nuclear accidents on April 26, 1986 at the Chernobyl NPP were of large scale causing significant radiological problems for many hundreds thousands of people. There were a number of important reasons of these and other accidents. The most important among them were time pressure by development of nuclear weapon, an absence of required financial and material means for adequate management of problems of nuclear and radiation safety, and inadequate understanding of harmful interaction of ionizing radiation on organism as well as a hypersecrecy by realization of projects of military and civilian use of nuclear energy in the former USSR. Introduction. The first nuclear reactor in the USSR reached the critical state on the 25 December 1946 [1] or 4 years later than reactor constructed by Enrico Fermi [2]. The first Soviet reactor was developed at the Laboratory N2 in Moscow (later I.V.Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy). This was a very important step in a realization of the Soviet military atomic program that began in September 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Version1.Cdr
    United Nations “To build such future and not to go astray , we must have a clear vision of what we actually want. When speaking about a long-term period , I , as the Head of State suggest the following as the mission of our country: !· to build an independent , prosperous and politically stable Kazakhstan with its inherent national unity , social justice and economic well-being of the entire population !· prosperity , security and raising the living standards of all the Kazakhstanis Such are key words to characterize Kazakhstan we all want to build. In process of our advancement into the 21st century they must remain our guides.” Nursultan Nazarbaev President of the Republic of Kazakhstan “Kazakhstan-2030,” 1997 “The United Nations Millennium Declaration embodies a large number of specific commitments aimed at improving the lot of humanity in the new century.” “(The implementation of the commitments) will require hard decisions and courageous reforms in all States and all areas of policy , ranging from cuts in energy consumption and carbon emissions ,… to more transparent and accountable governance and the reallocation of public resources towards projects that benefit the neediest groups in society , as opposed to the most influential.” Kofi Annan UN Secretary - General “Road Map Towards Implementation of the UN Millennium Declaration,” 2001 MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS IN KAZAKHSTAN “To build such future and not to go astray , we must have a clear vision of what we actually want. When speaking about a long-term period , I , as the Head of State suggest the following as the mission of our country: !· to build an independent , prosperous and politically stable Kazakhstan with its inherent national unity , social justice and economic well-being of the entire population !· prosperity , security and raising the living standards of all the Kazakhstanis Such are key words to characterize Kazakhstan we all want to build.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan 2004 Showed That Number of Prizes at International Contests
    The Expert club “Strategic vision” and Association “Education for all in Kazakhstan” were commissioned by the United Nations Development Program for production of the National Human Development Report for 2004 UNDP is the UN’s global development network, advocating for change and connecting countries to knowledge, experience and resources to help people build a better life. We are on the ground in 166 countries, working with them on their own solutions to global and national development challenges. As they develop local capacity, they draw on the people of UNDP and our wide range of partners. Report materials could be reproduced in other publications, without prior permission of UNDP, provided proper reference is made to this publication The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP Education for all: the key goal for a new millennium TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ...............................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................................6 FOREWORD BY DANIAL AKHMETOV THE PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN ........................9 FOREWORD BY YURIKO SHOJI UN RESIDENT COORDINATOR/ UNDP RESIDENT REPRESENTATIVE ...............10 MESSAGE FROM THE AUTHORS ...................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]