JEWELL-DISSERTATION-2016.Pdf (913.8Kb)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Copyright by Brianna Carolyn Jewell 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Brianna Carolyn Jewell Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: To Cut the Past: Queer Touch, Medieval Materiality, and the Craft of Wonder Committee: Wayne Lesser, Co-Supervisor Ann Cvetkovich, Co-Supervisor Daniel Birkholz Michael Johnson To Cut the Past: Queer Touch, Medieval Materiality, and the Craft of Wonder by Brianna Carolyn Jewell, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2016 To my sisters, the ones who chase wonder fiercely, and the ones who make me believe that I can too. Acknowledgements I write these acknowledgments exactly two months to the day after defending my dissertation. The last two months have forced me to confront the past (my pre-dissertation past) in new and sometimes paralyzing ways. My before-Austin life crashes into my present moment and makes me feel loss and mourning. And amidst these heavy, darker feelings, I am also grateful because I meet whatever-comes-next with a keener clarity and confidence because I have stayed with this project. I learned a lot. And I am thankful – damn thankful – for so many of the people I have met along the way. I am happy to be able to honor them here. First, I thank my committee, which has to be among the warmest and smartest groups of people out there. To Wayne Lesser, who met with me week after week, and who read my roughest and most incomprehensible drafts, I give my thanks a thousand times over. Wayne, it was you who made my thoughts move again after they got snarled and stuck and stagnant. Without your sharp, capacious mind and continued belief in me, this project would not only have been much less interesting, it might not have been at all. And to Ann Cvetkovich, the scholar I most strive to emulate: you think as you write – poetically, associatively – and you encouraged me to do so too. Your insistence that I stay anchored to the “specificity of the medieval” and the literal challenged me personally, artistically and academically, and made me become better on all those fronts; thank you. v Dan Birkholz, for keeping me honest, giving me deadlines, and demonstrating the craft of excellent teaching, thank you. All of your students are lucky, and I’m happy to count myself among them. Thanks for believing in me when it counted most. And to Michael Johnson, my wise, kind, fellow-Piscean friend. Talking with you about ideas, food, and life is hands-down one of my most treasured experiences of grad school. I miss you in Austin but look forward to a lifelong friendship with you. I’ve been blessed to find kindred spirits outside of my committee, too. Chris Taylor, you were my first friend here. And in the years it took me to write this project, you listened to me patiently and lovingly over and over again, and reminded me what I was arguing when I reached panic mode. In many ways, the success of this dissertation is also yours. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. Infinite love and thanks go to my girlfriends, and especially to my Austin coven – Jenni Sapio, Laura Beerits, and Yvette DeChavez. Thank you, thank you, for reminding me of who I am, and for always having my back. Special thanks also to Sarah Frank, Sara Saylor, and Luisa Ladd – for answering the phone, for dancing with me, and for being inspiring souls. Thank you to Austin’s Feminist Drinking Club, for similar reasons. I am thankful for my dissertation group, who read drafts of each chapter: Cynthia Francica, Lisa Gulesserian, Emily Lederman, and Sarah Orem. And to Peter Hamilton, Abby Bristol, Tom Lindsay, Michael Roberts, Michael White, Aaron Mercier, Charlotte Nunes, Brad King, John DeStafney, Marina Flider, Andy Uzendoski, Raul Ariza-Barile, Neville Hoad, and Chris Bradley. You all make Austin colorful and homey. I am thankful for Eileen Joy and the BABEL Working Group. vi And I am thankful for my students at UT, who inspired the pedagogical approach in this dissertation, and who made teaching a joyful job and life feel like it would be okay. My Austin yoga community – thanks especially to BFree, Iva Drtina-Hall, and Shelby Autrey – grounded and challenged me in ways that made this project simultaneously more playful and confident. Iva’s mantra on the mat, “presence is in the details,” impacted my thinking and feeling in this project in ways that I continue to discover. And I am deeply grateful for my family at Justine’s Brasserie – for providing a home base for me outside of academia, for keeping me out of debt, and for promising to publish my book. Thanks, last of all, and so much love to all of my family. To my mom and dad. To my grandmas, Kris and Grandy. And to my sisters, Dana and Kendra. vii To Cut the Past: Queer Touch, Medieval Materiality, and the Craft of Wonder Brianna Carolyn Jewell, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2016 Supervisors: Wayne Lesser and Ann Cvetkovich This dissertation emerges from a multivocal conversation in queer, affect, and medievalist scholarship, which privileges encounters with fragmentary details to create and describe connections between bodies separated in time and space. From Carolyn Dinshaw’s metaphorics of touch and “partial connection” across time to Roland Barthes’s punctum that joins disparate bodies, scholars invoke and rely on the fragmentary to describe and generate affective connections. This project makes that shared understanding explicit, literal, and literary – and also gives it a deeper history – by showing how medieval poets crafted and emphasized fragmentary tropes to enable connections that might not otherwise exist. Each chapter reads a medieval literary object – the bodily cut; stained glass; and, the grafted tree – as a fragmentary trope through which mutually exclusive entities (the dead and the living, the past and the present, and the earthly and the celestial) can be imagined as coming together and coexisting. Through graphic and sustained descriptions of the body and bodily sensations, both medieval and contemporary authors betray an interest in the visceral qualities of their fragmentary tropes, and rely on that viscerality to viii describe various forms of partial connection. To Cut the Past works to show that wonder, and specifically the openendedness and multiplicity that wonder generates, is the primary affect in establishing affective relationships between metaphysically disconnected entities. Encounters with the fragmentary objects I read create wonder, and that wonder in turn creates a portal or touchstone that allows access to perhaps otherwise unreachable worlds and things. The medieval texts I read show the process by which wonder connects. Ultimately, as I outline, this insight can be extended to pedagogy. By accepting an invitation from contemporary scholarship and medieval poets, we may encourage students to become alive to the fragments that stick out to them (the textual details to which they connect viscerally) in medieval and postmedieval texts, and to use those fragments as points of access to initiate their readings. This reading orientation works not only to make medieval literature relevant and interesting to students, and to offer a new way of understanding themselves and what matters to them; it also provides historically- enriched insight into the medieval past. ix Table of Contents Introduction / Feeling Medieval, Getting Fragmentary ........................................... 1 Chapter One / Cutting Connections: Wondrous Cuts in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and Fun Home .................................................................................. 33 1. Medieval Marvel ...................................................................................... 33 2. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight’s Wondrous Cuts ................................ 44 3. Bryng Me to the Poynt ............................................................................. 52 4. Pass Me the Scissors ................................................................................. 58 4. Þe Forme to þe Fynisment Foldez Ful Selden ......................................... 66 Chapter Two / Dreaming with Stained Glass: Botched Encounters, Gothic Churches and the Book of the Duchess ......................................................................... 71 1. Stained glass dreamscape ......................................................................... 71 2. Gothic architecture’s botched history ....................................................... 78 3. Seeing Connections through the Book of the Duchess’s stained glass ..... 90 4. Stained glass: medieval dream vision’s trope .......................................... 98 5. When stained glass becomes story ......................................................... 106 6. William Morris’s architectural dream .................................................... 110 Chapter Three / Grafting Connectivity: Sir Orfeo, Grafted Trees, and the Queer Craft of Looking Back ......................................................................................... 116 1. Looking back .......................................................................................... 116 2. The medieval literary invention of the grafted tree ................................ 124 3. Sir Orfeo’s grafted tree ........................................................................... 140 4. Grafting together