DOCSLIB.ORG

BORE ASPECTS OP MODERN GREEK SYLTAX by Athanaaios Kakouriotis a Thesis Submitted Fox 1 the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BORE ASPECTS OP MODERN GREEK SYLTAX by Athanaaios Kakouriotis a Thesis Submitted Fox 1 the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Of BORE ASPECTS OP MODERN GREEK SYLTAX by Athanaaios Kakouriotis A thesis submitted fox1 the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of London School of Oriental and African Studies University of London 1979 ProQuest Number: 10731354 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731354 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 II Abstract The present thesis aims to describe some aspects of Mod Greek syntax.It contains an introduction and five chapters. The introduction states the purpose for writing this thesis and points out the fact that it is a data-oriented rather, chan a theory-^oriented work. Chapter one deals with the word order in Mod Greek. The main conclusion drawn from this chapter is that, given the re­ latively rich system of inflexions of Mod Greek,there is a freedom of word order in this language;an attempt is made to account for this phenomenon in terms of the thematic structure. of the sentence and PSP theory. The second chapter examines the clitics;special attention is paid to clitic objects and some problems concerning their syntactic relations .to the rest of the sentence are pointed out;the chapter ends with the tentative suggestion that cli­ tics might be taken care of by the morphologichi component of the grammar• Chapter three deals with complementation;this a vast area of study and-for this reason the analysis is confined to 'oti1, 'na* and'pu' complement clauses; Object Raising, Verb Raising and Extraposition are also discussed in this chapter. The fourth chapter takes up Relative Clauses but again the analysis is confined to the two main relativizers that is, to •o opios' and *pu'. It is suggested that for *pu' a comple-’ mentizer analysis is quite possible.The second part of the chapter discusses Relative Extraposition which is explained in terms of thematic structure and PSP theory. Chapter five is about Coordination in Mod Greek.An attempt is made to distinguish between 'sentential"and 'phrasal* in terms of 'processes1.Gapping is also examined and pragmatic considerations are taken into account for its analysis. The thesis ends with a section which contains all the relevant bibliography. Ill Acknowledgement a I wish to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr.f.Bynon for her guidance and constant encouragement throughout the course of this work. !hanks are also due to my patient consultant Dr.Dick Hudson who was kind enough to initiate me into deep mysteries of surface structure. My gratitude to the SOAS Department of Linguistics is endless; I consider myself very lucky for having studied there. fhis work has been partly supported by a British Council "grand-in-aid" which came just in time.J am therefore deeply indebted to those who offered it to me. IV TABLE Off CONTENTS 2 a,ge INTRODUCTION 0 .1 The purpose 1 0 .2 The Content and the Approach 2 0.3 Previous work 10 0.4 Idealization o±' Data 11 0.3 A Note on the Inflectional Properties ■ 12 of Verbs CHAPTER ONE: WORD ORDER AND THE THEMATIC STRUCTURE 1 .1 General 17 1 .2 The Pocus of Information 18 1*3 Theme and Rheme 21 1.4 The Hallidayan Approach 29 1*3 Topic,Comment,Pocus and Presupposition 31 1 .6 Subjects and Objects with a Discourse 36 Function 1.7 Theme and Focus,a Distinction 40 1 .8 Word Order,Stress and the Clitics 43 1.9 Ambiguity due to Free Word Order 46 1 .1 0 Topic and Topicalization 47 l.ll Definiteness,Givenness and Topics 31 CHAPTER TWO: THE CLITICS 2 .1 A Survey 39 2 .2 Examples of Cliticized Words 60 2.3 Syntax of the Clitics 61 2.4 Stress on Clitics 63 2.3 Clitic Objects 64 2,3. 1 Clitic Objects as Nonfocal Elements 64 ia^e 2*5*2 Objective Case Personal Pronouns and Corresponding Clitics 65 2.5.5 Genitive Case Personal Pronouns and their Clitics 66 2 .6 Order of the Clitics 67 2.7 Clitics as Logical Subjects 72 2 .8 Clitics in Sensation Predicates 73 2.9 Clitics in Passives 75 2 .1 0 Clitics with Impersonal Expressions 76 2 .1 1 Ethical Dative Clitics 79 2 .1 2 Some Properties of the clitics 82 2.15 the Syntax of the Clitic Objects 84 CHAPTER THREE: COMPLEMENTATION 3.1 The Complementizers 92 3.1.1 Some Facts 92 3.2 The For-phrase in Mod Greek 94 3.3 Gerundive and Mod Greek 95 3.4 The Syntax of the Complement Clauses 100 3.5 On the Article of Complement Clauses 104 3.5.1 A Survey 104 3.5.2 Fact Deletion 106 3.5.3 A Syntactical Analysis 108 3.6 The ' oti* vs.’na' Opposition 111 3.7 Aspect in 'na1 Complements 117 3.7.1 Habitual vs.Nonhabitual 117 5.7.2 Aspect in Sensory Verbs 120 3.7.3 Instantaneous vs.Durative Events 128 3.8 Raising 132 3 .8 .1 A Case for Raising 132 3 *8 .2 Tensed Sentences 1 3 8 VI » Page 3.8*3 Object Raising 139‘ 3-8,4 Nonclitic Climbing 147 3.8*5 Verb Raising in hod Greek 149 3*9 Extraposition - 156 3*9.1 Extraposition and PSP :t 15& 3.9.2 Extraposition with Bisentential Verbs I63 3*10 The Semantics of Complement Clauses 166 3.10.1 Mod Greek Pactives 16& 3.10.2 Factivity and Stress I67 3.10*3 Pocus and Presupposition 1.7X 3.11 A Semantic Classification of Predicates 18*1 3.11*1 Assertive vs.Nonassertive 181 3*11.2 Weak Assertives 191 3*11.3 Strong Assertives - > 197 3.11.4 Nonassertives 199 3.11.5 Semif actives 2CX7. 3.11.6 Pure Pactives 20.3 CHAPTER POUR: THE RELATIVE CLAUSE 4*1 Inflectional Properties 20 6 4*2 'o opios'j'pu' 20? 4.3 The Accessibility Hierarchy 212 4.4 Constraints on Relativization 218 4.5 Extraposition in Relative Clauses 225 4.6 Relative Clauses and Adverbs 231 4*7 Relative,Subjunctive. and"Presupposition 234 CHAPTER FIVE: COORDINATION 5.1 Sentential and Phrasal a distinction 237 5.2 Coordination and Processes .240 5.3 The Disjuncts ‘ i 1 ieither or 2;49 5.4 1ala1 but ^251 VII Page 5.5 Gapping prg1 - 5.5.1 Gapping and Word Order* 255 5.6 The Coordinate Constituent Gonstrainet 2£9 5.7 Asyndetic Coordination 265 5.8 Asyndetic Subordination 26£ BIBLIOGRAPHY 26? (\ 11 ycvi<lifon 5 'UsSgoL hoc • A ccusQttve. M y /■) d~\cotPt /) dv. h r t Avii aC-e. Ct.Qi-) C & t ic Coyyj jo Co'wjp-C'Yife'nC DPT Dcaic^k't&c Dep^devc^ Ch-tofyj^ p o O it€ c t 0€jecb F$P fujvoju)^ oJl Se-nte^ct P-e*spectt\'£ (rc n G en itive I ^ j O JF^e^a/tivP X'iwjp £4-/. / X h d .(itJ T v oil c<a6/V^L I 0 lyd'/Jce.ofc O i ^ c t r n & P&c-feob/'vp p e p ^ u u P P^jO ffyjPoS/'t/bv7 ^ S iy ^ u d & c 5u^j f(j- [ fainsjotvrf&tu?,yi&I GvQMo*?(Zfc VIII To my wife and. my brother INTRODUCTION ! 0.1 The purpose- The present thesis is an informal discussion of some aspects of Modern Greek syntax. However, I must point out from the outset that what I intend to do is to give a description. My work, then, is 'data oriented' rather than theory oriented. This is mainly due to my belief that linguistics needs first a collection of valuable facts from a diverse cross- section of languages before formulating linguistic theories. Trying to collect all data is like asking for the moon. Hut this does not necessarily mean that a scanty collection of some facts will do the job* The more facts we get, the better we will manage to make valuable generalizations based on these facts. VJhat I mean is simply this: at the present stage of the development of the linguistic 'science';our knowledge and understanding of the languages is still not quite sufficient. As a result, current linguistic theories seem to indulge in a race of refuting one another; so much so, that one feels his faith in linguistics shaken. This situation is worsened by the "smart Alec", "clever-clever" attitude which rival theories maintain towards each other of the Frankestain and the Zombies type. Despite the fact that language changes, I do believe that a good description can become an everlasting possession;and a good description is more viable than a good theory. Indeed, I feel quite sure that l^persen will be referred to by stud­ ents of language when many present-day leading stars of linguistics will have been forgotten. 2 0.2 The Content and the Approach 1 believe that a linguistic description can make a good use of both data derived from introspection and data drawn from texts. 1 have, therefore, taken my material from both, hut since inbrospection involves some well-known risks I have employed informants or7to be more preciset consultants to check the correctness of the material.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Phenomenological Self-Givenness to the Notion of Spiritual Freedom IRIS HENNIGFELD
    PhænEx 13, no. 2 (Winter 2020): 38-51 © 2020 Iris Hennigfeld From Phenomenological Self-Givenness to the Notion of Spiritual Freedom IRIS HENNIGFELD The program of the phenomenological movement, “Back to the things themselves!” does not point to any particular topic of phenomenological investigation, for example the question of being (ontology) or the question of God (metaphysics). Rather, it designates a specific methodological approach toward the things, and, as its final aim, toward a particular mode in which the things are given in experience. One particular mode in which the things are given with full evidence and in original intuition is “self-givenness”. In the experience of self-givenness, the object is fully present, or, in Edmund Husserl’s words, given in “originary presentive intuition” (Husserl, Ideas I 44, cf. 36). The correlative act on the part of the subject, the noesis, is a “seeing” which is not restricted to the senses but must be understood “in the universal sense as an originally presentive consciousness of any kind whatever” (Husserl, Ideas I 36). Self-givenness also represents the criterion of evidence and truth. The phenomenological principles of givenness and self-givenness can be made fruitful in particular for a description and investigation of those phenomena which, according to their very nature, resist other theoretical approaches. Such more “resilient” phenomena include interpersonal, religious or aesthetic experiences. Presentation becomes, in accordance with philosophical tradition, the dominant model in phenomenological research. But first-person experience shows that presentation is not the only mode of givenness and self-givenness. Rather, pushing phenomenology to its limits, the full range of experience shows that there are certain kinds of phenomena of which the genuine mode of givenness cannot be reduced to the way in which objects are presented to a subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Givenness and Its Realization in a Linguistic and in a Non- Linguistic Environment
    VILNIUS PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH PHILOLOGY NATALIJA ZACHAROVA GIVENNESS AND ITS REALIZATION IN A LINGUISTIC AND IN A NON- LINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENT MA Paper Academic advisor: prof. Dr. Hab. Laimutis Valeika Vilnius, 2008 VILNIUS PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH PHILOLOGY GIVENNESS AND ITS REALIZATION IN A LINGUISTIC AND IN A NON- LINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENT This MA paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of the MA in English Philology By Natalija Zacharova I declare that this study is my own and does not contain any unacknowledged work from any source. (Signature) (Date) Academic advisor: prof. Dr. Hab. Laimutis Valeika (Signature) (Date) Vilnius, 2008 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………….4 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………...5 1. THE PROBLEMS OF THE INFORMATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE SENTENCE ……………………………………………………………….8 1.1. The sentence as dialectical entity of given and new……………………...8 1.2. Givenness vs. Newnness………………………………………………….11 1.3. The realization of Givenness……………………………………………..12 1.4. Givenness expressed by the definite article ……………………………..15 1.5. Givenness expressed by the indefinite article…………………………….19 1.6. Givenness expressed by semi-grammatical definite determiners and lexical determiners………………………………………………………..20 2. THE REALIZATION OF GIVENNESS IN A LINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENT……………………………………………………………………21 2.1. Anaphoric Givenness………………………………………………………22 2.2. Cataphoric Givenness……………………………………………………...29 2.3. Givenness expressed by the use of the indefinite article…………………..30 3. THE REALIZATION OF GIVENNESS IN A NON- LINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENT……………………………………………………………………..32 3. 1. The environment of the home……………………………………………...33 3.2. The environment of the town/country, world………………………………35 3.3. The environment of the universe…………………………………………....37 3.4. Cultural environment……………………………………………………….38 4.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Syntax &amp; Information Structure: The Grammar of English Inversions Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sv7q1pm Author Samko, Bern Publication Date 2016 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ SYNTAX & INFORMATION STRUCTURE: THE GRAMMAR OF ENGLISH INVERSIONS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in LINGUISTICS by Bern Samko June 2016 The Dissertation of Bern Samko is approved: Professor Jim McCloskey, chair Associate Professor Pranav Anand Associate Professor Line Mikkelsen Assistant Professor Maziar Toosarvandani Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Bern Samko 2016 Contents Acknowledgments x 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Thequestions ............................... 1 1.1.1 Summaryofresults ........................ 2 1.2 Syntax................................... 6 1.3 InformationStructure . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7 1.3.1 Topic ............................... 8 1.3.2 Focus ............................... 11 1.3.3 Givenness............................. 13 1.3.4 The distinctness of information structural notions . ....... 14 1.3.5 TheQUD ............................. 17 1.4 The relationship between syntax and information structure ....... 19 1.5 Thephenomena .............................. 25 1.5.1
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Expectations in Chinese Relative Clause Comprehension
    StructuralExpectationsinChineseRelativeClause Comprehension ZhongChen,KyleGrove,andJohnHale CornellUniversity 1. Introduction Relative clauses (RC) are among the most well-studied constructions in the field of psycholinguis- tics. A wide variety of work explores a robust processing asymmetry such that subject relatives (SRs) are easier to process than object relatives (ORs). For example, English shows a subject advantage, as demonstrated by a number of studies involving different measures including: self-paced reading (King & Just, 1991), eye-tracking (Traxler, Morris & Seely, 2002), ERP (King & Kutas, 1995), fMRI (Just, Carpenter, Keller, Eddy & Thulborn, 1996); and PET (Stromswold, Caplan, Alpert & Rauch, 1996). A robust finding in the literature suggests that subject preference seems to be a universal processing phenomenon in RCs. Some pieces of evidence come from Dutch (Frazier, 1987), French (Frauenfelder, Segui & Mehler, 1980), German (Schriefers, Friederici & Kuhn,¨ 1995), Japanese (Miyamoto & Naka- mura, 2003) and Korean (Kwon, Polinsky & Kluender, 2006). In order to account for the universal processing pattern of RCs, several theories are proposed, such as: WORD ORDER (Bever, 1970; MacDonald & Christiansen, 2002), the ACCESSIBILITY HIER- ARCHY (Keenan & Comrie, 1977), EXPERIENCE/FREQUENCY-BASED ACCOUNTS (Mitchell, Cuetos, Corley & Brysbaert, 1995; Hale, 2001), STRUCTURE-BASED APPROACHES (O’Grady, 1997; Hawkins, 2004) and WORKING MEMORY (Gibson, 2000; Lewis & Vasishth, 2005). Chinese RCs are valuable in testing those theories and
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Grammar in Greek
    Greek Grammar in Greek William S. Annis Scholiastae.org∗ February 5, 2012 Sometimes it would be nice to discuss grammar without having to drop back to our native language, so I’ve made a collection of Greek grammatical vocabulary. My primary source is E. Dickey’s Ancient Greek Scholarship. Over more than a millennium of literary scholarship in the ancient world has resulted in a vast and somewhat redundant vocabulary for many corners of grammar. Since my goal is to make it possible to produce Greek rather than to provide a guide to ancient scholarship — for which Dickey’s book is the best guide — I have left out a lot of duplicate terminology. In general I tried to pick the word that appears to inspire the Latin, and thus the modern, grammatical vocabulary. I also occasionally checked to see what Modern Greek uses for a term. Parts of Speech The Greeks divided up the parts of speech a little differently, but for the most part we’ve inherited their division. • μέρος λόγου “part of speech” • ὄνομα, τό “noun” • ἐπίθετον “adjective” (in ancient grammar considered a kind of noun) • ῥῆμα, τό “verb” • μετοχή, ἡ “participle” (which we now think of as part of the verb) • ἄρθρον, τό “article” and also relative pronoun in the scholia • ἀντωνυμία, ἡ “pronoun” { ἀναφορική “relative” { δεικτική “demonstrative” { κτητική “possessive,” i.e., ἐμός, σός, κτλ. • πρόθεσις, ἡ “preposition” ∗This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. 1 • ἐπίρρημα, τό “adverb” but also covering some particles in the scholia • σύνδεσμος, ὁ “conjunction” but, again, also covering some particles in the scholia There was no classical word that matched the contemporary notion of a particle, which were described by their function as either σύνδεσμοι or ἐπιρρήματα.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus and Givenness: a Unified Approach Michael Wagner Mcgill University
    1 Focus and Givenness: A Unified Approach Michael Wagner McGill University Abstract Theories about information structure differ in treating focus-, contrast-, and givenness-marking as either a single phenomenon or as distinct phenomena. This paper argues for a unified approach, following the lead of Schwarzschild (1999), but a unified approach based on local alternatives (Wagner, 2005, 2006b).1 The basic insights of the local alternatives approach are captured using a new formalization, which aims to fix several problems in the original proposal noted in B¨uring (2008). The unified approach is compared with alternative approaches that invoke separate mechanisms for givenness and focus: the disanaphora approach (Williams, 1997), the F-Projection account (Selkirk, 1984, 1995), and the reference set approach in Szendr¨oi (2001) and Reinhart (2006). All of these have fundamental problems, and the requisite revisions render them equivalent to the local alternatives approach. Keywords: alternatives, focus, givenness, prosody, contrast, information struc- ture 1 The label ‘local alternatives’ for the ‘relative giveneness’ account in Wagner (2005, 2006b) was proposed in Rooth (2007) and seems like a more appropriate term. 2 Michael Wagner 1.1 Three Phenomena, or Two, or One? The distribution of accents in a sentence in English is affected by informa- tion structure in a systematic way. Information structure comprises a broad set of phenomena. This paper looks at three types of effects that influence the prosody of a sentence, those of question-answer congruence, contrast, and givenness, and presents evidence—some new, some already presented in Wag- ner (2005, 2006b)—that all three should be treated as reflexes of the same underlying phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Finiteverbformationinlycian
    Finite verb formation in Lycian Nils Oscar Paul Billing s2092417 Supervisor: Dr. Alwin Kloekhorst 2nd reader: Dr. Michaël Peyrot Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of ResMA Linguistics Specialisation: Indo-European linguistics July 2019 Universiteit Leiden The Netherlands Abstract In this thesis, the finite verb in Lycian is described. All verbal endings and stems are analysed and given both a synchronic description and, to the maximum possible ex- tent, a diachronic explanation. First, all verbal endings are gathered and described both generally and individually. Subsequently, the verbal stems are categorised into types according to stem formant (last segment(s) before the ending) and ending allo- morphy (e.g. lenited vs. unlenited). The last sections are devoted to a detailed individ- ual treatment of all attested Lycian verbal stems. A schema is presented in which the established Lycian stem types are mapped to their original Proto-Indo-European types (section 4.6), e.g. Lyc. s-stems < PIE sḱé/ó-presents. Thereby, a comprehensive model is provided by which the Lycian finite verb may be understood in both its Anatolian and Indo-European context. Acknowledgements My first thanks go out to all the wonderful people at—and affiliated with—LUCL, with whom I have shared so many lovely times and enjoyed an extraordinarily stimulating atmosphere during my two years in Leiden. I am grateful to my supervisor, Dr. Alwin Kloekhorst, for elegantly guiding me along this sometimes winding path. His deep knowledge and display of genuine interest in my ideas have meant a great deal to me as an aspiring scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • Polancec, the Invariant Relativizer in Contemporary Non-Standard Croatian
    Jurica Polančec (University of Zagreb) The invariant relativizer in contemporary non-standard Croatian In this talk, we will present the invariant relativizer in contemporary Croatian with an empha- sis on non-standard language. We will briefly introduce the Croatian invariant relativizer and its four forms (što, šta, kaj, ča). These four relativizers originate in separate Croatian dialects (što and šta in Štokavian, kaj in Kajkavian, and ča in Čakavian). Regardless of the dialect, the forms are functionally equivalent and have the same source in their respective dialects (the nom/acc case of the what pronoun). In contemporary language, they differ in their sociolinguistic status: only što is standard; što, šta and kaj are used in everyday informal Croatian, which is close to the standard, but fea- tures some non-codified elements and is often influenced by dialects (Langston & Peti-Stantić 2014: 30, cf. van Marle 1997: 13–17). The form kaj is geographically confined to Northern Croatia including the capital Zagreb. We will discuss in some detail the rise of the form kaj from the dialectal status. We will also show that the form što, when used in the standard, is typical of more formal and elaborate registers, in particular the language of literature. As for the other registers of standard Croatian, such as journalistic or scientific, the invariant relativizer often figures as a mere substitute for the relative pronoun (Kordić 1995: 164). Cases in which the invariant rela- tivizer is at the same time a feature of everyday informal language as well as of the rather for- mal written registers of standard language are quite unusual.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Conceiving the Middle Voice for Greek and Latin Students Seumas Macdonald
    Re-conceiving the middle voice for Greek and Latin students Seumas Macdonald The following begun as a series of blog posts attempting to summarise and explain the middle voice across Greek and Latin, aimed at teachers and students of the language. It came about as a result of continually needing to explain various points and my own need to systematically read through and think through these issues. Almost entirely, the view expressed in this write-up is that of Suzanne Kemmer, in her key work The Middle Voice, along with R.J. Allen’s 2002 dissertation, “The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek. A study in Polysemy” (since published, but I only have the dissertation version). So, we begin with Suzanne Kemmer, The Middle Voice, which “approaches the middle voice from the perspective of typology and language universals research” (1), and move on to semantic categories, Latin, and deponency. The problem with Greek voice All my problems started, or continue to start with Greek students, and Greek grammars, especially pesky NT Greek ones. NT Greek courses do a particularly bad job at the nuances of Greek, I find. So, students are very often taught, or at least end up with, a view of Greek that is: Active: I hit Mike. Passive: Mike is hit by me. Middle: “something vaguely in the middle where I am benefited by hitting Mike” This is usually a very English (vel sim) -driven view, in that the middle is an awkward third- voice squished between the Active and Passive. Two things, in my own long growth in Greek knowledge, helped get over this.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Undergoer Voice in Borneo: Penan, Punan, Kenyah and Kayan
    Undergoer Voice in Borneo Penan, Punan, Kenyah and Kayan languages Antonia SORIENTE University of Naples “L’Orientale” Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology-Jakarta This paper describes the morphosyntactic characteristics of a few languages in Borneo, which belong to the North Borneo phylum. It is a typological sketch of how these languages express undergoer voice. It is based on data from Penan Benalui, Punan Tubu’, Punan Malinau in East Kalimantan Province, and from two Kenyah languages as well as secondary source data from Kayanic languages in East Kalimantan and in Sawarak (Malaysia). Another aim of this paper is to explore how the morphosyntactic features of North Borneo languages might shed light on the linguistic subgrouping of Borneo’s heterogeneous hunter-gatherer groups, broadly referred to as ‘Penan’ in Sarawak and ‘Punan’ in Kalimantan. 1. The North Borneo languages The island of Borneo is home to a great variety of languages and language groups. One of the main groups is the North Borneo phylum that is part of a still larger Greater North Borneo (GNB) subgroup (Blust 2010) that includes all languages of Borneo except the Barito languages of southeast Kalimantan (and Malagasy) (see Table 1). According to Blust (2010), this subgroup includes, in addition to Bornean languages, various languages outside Borneo, namely, Malayo-Chamic, Moken, Rejang, and Sundanese. The languages of this study belong to different subgroups within the North Borneo phylum. They include the North Sarawakan subgroup with (1) languages that are spoken by hunter-gatherers (Penan Benalui (a Western Penan dialect), Punan Tubu’, and Punan Malinau), and (2) languages that are spoken by agriculturalists, that is Òma Lóngh and Lebu’ Kulit Kenyah (belonging respectively to the Upper Pujungan and Wahau Kenyah subgroups in Ethnologue 2009) as well as the Kayan languages Uma’ Pu (Baram Kayan), Busang, Hwang Tring and Long Gleaat (Kayan Bahau).
    [Show full text]
  • BCGL13, 16-18.12.2020 1 the Syntax of Complementizers
    BCGL13, 16-18.12.2020 The syntax of complementizers: a revised version Anna Roussou University of Patras ([email protected]) BCGL 13, The syntax and semantics of clausal complementation 16-18.12.2020 [joint work with Rita Manzini] 1. Setting the scene A clarification: why ‘a revised version’ Roussou (1994), The syntax of complementisers – the investigation of three basic constructions: (a) factive complements and extraction, Greek oti vs factive pu – a definite C (b) that-complements and subject extraction, an agreeing null C (c) na-complements in Greek and the subject dependency (control vs obviation) • Assumptions back then: -- that is an expletive element (Lasnik & Saito 1984, Law 1991) – complementizers in general are expletives -- But in some cases, as in factives, they may bear features for familiarity (Hegarty 1992) or definiteness, or license a definite operator (Melvold 1991) [that-factives are weak islands, pu- factives are strong islands] Some questions a) What is a complement clause? b) What is a complementizer? c) What is the role of the complementizer? d) How is complementation achieved if there is no complementizer? Some potential answers to the questions above a) complement clauses are nominal (the traditional grammarian view): mainly objects, but also subjects; it is a complement or a relative (?) b) not so clear: the lexical item that introduces a clause or the syntactic head C (Bresnan 1972) – in the latter reading, C can be realized by a variety of elements including conjunctions (that, oti, pu, che, etc.), prepositions
    [Show full text]
  • A Short and Easy
    A SHORT A ND EASY MODERN GREEK GRAMMAR C a r l W ied l o t A SHORT AND EASY MODERN GREEK GRAMMAR. W ITH MMA TI A L D A T A EX E I GRA C A N CONVERS ION L RC SES, ID I MA TI PR VERBIAL PHRASES AND O C, O , B ULA Y F ULL VOCA R . FTER THE GERMAN OF CARL WIED MARY GARDNER WITH A PREFACE BY ERNEST GARD NER M A , . FELLOW O F G O VILLE A ND AIU O LLEGE AMBRI GE N C S C , C D , A ND R E BR F DI CTO R. O F THE ITISH SCHO O L O ARCHAEO LO GY A T ATHENS I onbon D A V ID NUTT 2 70 AND 2 7 1 STRAND 1 892 R I HAR LAY A ND O S IMITE C D C S N , L D , LO D B NDO N AN UNG AY . (Allrights reserved . ) ’ TRANSLATO R S PREFACE. MY very hearty t hanks are d ue to allwho have so kin dly helped V me m t t as F st m st t a Mr V ied an d t a e in y sligh k . ir I u h nk . , k the O pportunity t o ask his pardon for the amount of a lteration an d rearrangement of his text which I have found it impo ssib le t o a Mr L a h as a m an d t a s . e at e void .
    [Show full text]