DOCSLIB.ORG

Corrosion of Epoxy Coated Rebar in Florida Bridges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Corrosion of Epoxy Coated Rebar in Florida Bridges Report Prepared by: Alberto A. Sagüés* Jae Bong Lee* Xiaoyuan Chang* Howard PickeringH Eric NystromH William Carpenter* S. C. Kranc* Tonya Simmons* Bruce Boucher* Sherry Hierholzer* *University of South Florida HThe Pennsylvania State University CORROSION OF EPOXY COATED REBAR IN FLORIDA BRIDGES Final Report to Florida D.O.T. WPI No. 0510603, State Job No. 99700-7556-010 Alberto A. Sagüés, P.I. Department of Civil Engineering and Mechanics College of Engineering University of South Florida Tampa, Florida 33620-5350 May, 1994 This electronic version was prepared 03/01/2002 Errata have been corrected in pages T1, T7 and T10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This report was prepared in cooperation with the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). The field investigations were performed jointly with personnel from the Corrosion Section of the Materials Office, Florida Department of Transportation, Gainesville, Florida. The Corrosion Section provided also valuable assistance in the preparation of concrete laboratory specimens and analysis of concrete samples. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation. ii CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................. i ACKNOWLEDGMENT................................................................................ ii CONTENTS .................................................................................................. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................ 4 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 7 1.1 Background .......................................................................... ...........7 1.2 Information needs critical to FDOT................................................. 8 1.3 Objectives of the project.................................................................. 9 1.4 Approach........................................................................................... 9 2. METHODOLOGY - FIELD INVESTIGATIONS..........................................11 2.1 Test site selection. ...........................................................................11 2.2 Site activities. ...................................................................................11 2.2.1 Visual examination and soundings.....................................11 2.2.2 Rebar cover .........................................................................11 2.2.3 Concrete Resistivity.............................................................12 2.2.4 Coring....................................................................................12 2.2.5 Rebar sample extraction.....................................................12 2.2.6 Field coating adherence determination.............................13 2.2.7 Half-cell potentials ................................................................13 2.2.8 Macrocell Current Measurements ......................................13 2.2.9 Mutual Resistance measurements.....................................14 2.2.10 Polarization resistance........................................................14 2.3 Laboratory Evaluation of Field Specimens ...................................15 2.3.1 Appearance, coating thickness and coating breaks........15 2.3.2 Backside appearance.........................................................15 2.3.3 Coating adhesion.................................................................15 2.3.4 Chloride concentration profiles...........................................16 2.3.5 Aggregate characterization.................................................16 2.3.6 Dry/wet concrete resistivity and weight changes..............16 2.3.7 Evidence of fly ash...............................................................17 1 3. METHODOLOGY - MECHANISTIC INVESTIGATIONS ..........................18 3.1 Mechanism of coating disbondment..............................................18 3.1.2 Experiments with model solutions ......................................18 3.1.3 Tests in concrete ..................................................................19 3.2 Crevice corrosion and corrosion protection..................................19 3.2.1 Pitting initiation potentials ...................................................19 3.2.2 Cathodic protection..............................................................21 3.3 Mechanical effects of corrosion......................................................21 3.3.1 Laboratory time to cracking determinations, coated versus black bar. ....................................................21 3.3.2 Computational stress intensity determinations .................22 4. RESULTS - FIELD INVESTIGATIONS......................................................24 4.1 Inventory of sites tested ...................................................................24 4.2 Rebar cover ......................................................................................24 4.3 Concrete resistivity...........................................................................24 4.4 Concrete chloride content ...............................................................25 4.5 Other concrete characteristics........................................................27 4.6 Rebar continuity and mutual resistance.........................................27 4.7 Half cell potentials ............................................................................27 4.8 Macrocell current..............................................................................28 4.9 Polarization resistance....................................................................28 4.10 Rebar coating adhesion..................................................................28 4.11 Rebar surface condition..................................................................29 4.12 Coating thickness.............................................................................31 4.13 Metal and coating backside condition...........................................31 5. RESULTS - MECHANISTIC INVESTIGATIONS ......................................32 5.1 Mechanism of coating disbondment..............................................32 5.1.1 Disbondment in model solutions ........................................32 5.1.2 Disbondment in concrete ....................................................33 5.2 Crevice corrosion and corrosion protection..................................34 5.2.1 Pitting initiation potentials ...................................................34 5.2.2 Cathodic protection..............................................................34 2 5.3 Mechanical effects of corrosion......................................................35 5.3.1 Time to cracking experiments.............................................35 5.3.2 Computation of stress intensity...........................................36 6. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS......................................................................38 6.1 Mechanism of corrosion..................................................................38 6.1.1 Introduction. ...............38 6.1.2 Two key factors. .................38 6.1.3 Importance of coating breaks . ...........39 6.1.4 Extent of coating breaks. ..............39 6.1.5 Importance and extent of coating disbondment .................40 6.1.6 Development of disbondment.............................................40 6.1.7 Electrolyte in disbonded regions ........................................41 6.1.8 Crevice corrosion.................................................................41 6.1.9 Corrosion rate estimation....................................................42 6.1.10 Performance improvements................................................43 6.1.11 Corrosion development - a proposed sequence..............44 6.2 Present condition of bridges in Florida..........................................45 6.3 Prognosis of future corrosion performance...................................47 6.3.1 Objective ...............................................................................47 6.3.2 Approach...............................................................................47 6.3.3 Initiation period.....................................................................48 6.3.4 Propagation period..............................................................51 6.3.5 Prognosis..............................................................................52 6.4 Future directions...............................................................................56 6.4.1 Use of ECR...........................................................................56 6.4.2 Corrosion Protection Alternatives - New Design..............58 6.4.3 Corrosion Protection - Present Structures ........................60 7. CONCLUSIONS...........................................................................................62 8. REFERENCES............................................................................................65 9. TABLES ................................................................................................T1 10. FIGURES ................................................................................................F1 11. APPENDIX 1 ................................................................................................A1 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This investigation was aimed at determining
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF? Click Here
    THE PREMIER SPACE COAST MAGAZINE ESPECIALLY FOR ADULTS 50+ ® SENIOR SCENE October 2020 FREE Cover Artist: Russell Gulick FINANCE | HEALTH | ENTERTAINMENT | COUPONS | NEWS Voting Safety Is Probate Better? Dietary Safety Lynching Tree Lane Melbourne, FL – Vietnam Vet Finds Relief From Painful Bone Tumors Thanks To Two Innovative Therapies Working Together aving cancer is challenging enough, and if it moves into Risks of the OsteoCool™ system include damage to Hsurrounding bone, it can be extremely painful. surrounding tissue. If a patient has a tumor in the cervical That’s what happened to Vincent, a 71-year-old Vietnam spine (neck), this procedure should not be used. 1 veteran who lives in Melbourne, FL, and has prostate Although the complication rate for BKP is low, as with cancer. Last spring, he started feeling severe pain in his most surgical procedures, serious adverse events, some of legs and hips. which can be fatal, can occur, including heart attack, cardiac “I had so much trouble walking, I thought I was going arrest (heart stops beating), stroke, and embolism (blood, to get paralyzed,” Vincent said. fat, or cement that migrates to the lungs or heart). Other After an MRI found something on Vincent’s spine, risks include infection; leakage of bone cement into the interventional radiologist Dr. Paul Rotolo took a biopsy muscle and tissue surrounding the spinal cord and nerve that confirmed Vincent had metastatic tumors on his injury that can, in rare instances, cause paralysis; leakage of L3 vertebra. bone cement into the blood vessels resulting in damage to “He had life-limiting pain,” Rotolo says.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Sediment Microbiome of the Indian River Lagoon, FL, USA, an Estuary of National
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.191254; this version posted July 7, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Defining the sediment microbiome of the Indian River Lagoon, FL, USA, an Estuary of National 2 Significance 3 4 David J. Bradshaw II,1* Nicholas J. Dickens,1#a John H. Trefry,2 Peter J. McCarthy1 5 6 1Department of Biological Sciences, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute at Florida Atlantic 7 University, Fort Pierce, FL, United States of America 8 2Department of Ocean Engineering and Marine Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, 9 Melbourne, FL, United States of America 10 #aCurrent address: Amazon.com, Inc., London, United Kingdom 11 12 *Corresponding author 13 E-mail: [email protected] (DJB) 14 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.191254; this version posted July 7, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Sediment Microbiome of the Indian River Lagoon… 15 Abstract 16 The Indian River Lagoon, located on the east coast of Florida, USA, is an Estuary of 17 National Significance and an important economic and ecological resource. The Indian River 18 Lagoon faces several environmental pressures, including freshwater discharges through the St.
    [Show full text]
  • SSAC Approval and Decision Document for Indian River Lagoon and Banana River Lagoon
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAl PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 .JUL 2 9 2013 Mr. Herschel T. Vinyard Secretary Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Dear Secretary Vinyard: The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency has completed its review of the site specific alternative criteria (SSAC) for total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) for the Indian River Lagoon and Banana River Lagoon (IRL). Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection submitted revised Chapter 62-302, including the SSAC, to the EPA on June 13, 2012, as new or revised water quality standards with the necessary certification by FDEP general counsel, pursuant to 40 CFR 131. The SSAC were included in the list of site specific numeric interpretations of paragraph 62-302.530(47)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), referenced in paragraph 62-302.531(2Xa), F.A.C. and published at FDEP's website at http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/wqssp/swq-docs.htm. FDEP submitted the numeric interpretations of the state narrative nutrient criterion for WBIDs 3044A, 3057A, 3057B, 3057C, 2963A, 2963B, 2963C, 2963D, 2963E, 2963F, 5003B, 5003C and 5003D in the 1RL Total Maximum Daily Load report as the SSAC. FDEP intends for these SSAC to serve as the numeric nutrient criteria for TN and TP for IRL. In accordance with section 303(c) of the Clean Water Act, I am hereby approving the SSAC for the IRL as revised water quality standards for TN and TP. Any other criteria applicable to this waterbody remain in effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Plan for Eau Gallie Riverfront a Waterfronts Florida Community
    Vision Plan For Eau Gallie Riverfront A Waterfronts Florida Community Melbourne, Florida July 2004 Vision Plan For Eau Gallie Riverfront A Waterfronts Florida Community Prepared for: Eau Gallie Riverfront Community Redevelopment Agency Advisory Committee/Waterfronts Florida Partnership Committee By: Eau Gallie Waterfronts Vision Workgroup Gene Davis Eau Gallie CRA Advisory Committee Waterfronts Florida Partnership Committee Sharon Dwyer Director, Eau Gallie Public Library Richard Hester Waterfronts Florida Liaison Manager Carol McCloud Eau Gallie Crime Watch and Neighborhood Improvement Max Spector President, Friends of the Eau Gallie Library, Inc. Carol Crispen City of Melbourne, Eau Gallie Redevelopment Manager July 2004 Approved by the Melbourne City Council September 14, 2004 Vision Plan For Eau Gallie Riverfront A Waterfronts Florida Community Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………………….1 History…………………………………………………………………………..2 The Area.………………………………………………………………………..3 Developing the Vision…………………………………………………………..4 Vision and Goals………………………………………………………………..5 Funding the Vision……………………………………………………………..11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The community, in response to the area’s Waterfronts Florida Partnership designation created this Vision Plan for the Olde Eau Gallie Riverfront of the City of Melbourne. The Vision Plan is intended to supplement the Olde Eau Gallie Riverfront Urban Infill and Community Redevelopment Plan, not to replace the plan. Items from the Redevelopment Plan were blended with new ideas for the area to create the Vision Plan. The Vision Plan highlights the following: 1. History of the area. 2. Description of the area. 3. How the vision was developed. 4. Visions and goals the community has for the area. 5. Potential funding sources of projects. The focus of the plan is on the development of the waterfront and the surrounding area.
    [Show full text]
  • North Indian River Lagoon BMAP Was Completed in September 2012; And
    BASIN MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN for the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads for Nutrients Adopted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in the Indian River Lagoon Basin North Indian River Lagoon developed by the North Indian River Lagoon Stakeholders in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Bureau of Watershed Restoration Tallahassee, FL 32399 January 2013 FINAL North Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan – 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The North Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan was prepared as part of a statewide watershed management approach to restore and protect Florida’s water quality. It was developed by the North Indian River Lagoon stakeholders, identified below, with participation from affected local, regional, and state governmental interests; elected officials and citizens; and private interests. - = Empty cell ALLOCATION ENTITIES AGENCIES OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES Florida Department of Agriculture and Algae Collection Technology, Agricultural Producers Consumer Services Inc. Florida Department of Environmental Brevard County Applied Ecology Protection Applied Technology and Volusia County Florida Farm Bureau Federation Management Indian River Lagoon National Estuary City of Cocoa BSE Consultants Program City of Edgewater St. Johns River Water Management District Cape Canaveral Scientific, Inc. City of Indian Harbour Beach - CDM Smith City of Melbourne - Citizens City of Oak Hill - E Sciences, Inc. City of Rockledge - Eco Sense International City of Titusville - England Thims and Miller Florida Department of Transportation - Indian Riverkeeper District 5 Jones Edmunds and Kennedy Space Center - Associates Town of Indialantic - Marine Resources Council Town of Palm Shores - Masteller and Moler, Inc, Town of Melbourne Village - SAIC Florida Power and Light – - Wildwood Consulting, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • NCHRP-IDEA Program Quarterly Report
    NCHRP IDEA Program Products with an Impact or Potential Impact on Current Highway Practice Notable Examples April 2020 NCHRP IDEA Program Products with an Impact or Potential Impact on Current Highway Practice Notable Examples April 2020 NCHRP IDEA Program Committee (2020) Chair Catherine McGhee Kevin Pete Director, Virginia Transportation Director, Research and Technology Research Council Implementation Texas DOT Virginia DOT Rachael Sack Members Director, USDOT SBIR Program Ahmad Abu Hawash Volpe National Transportation Systems Chief Structural Engineer Center Iowa DOT James Sime Farhad Ansari Consultant, Formerly Connecticut DOT Associate Vice Chancellor for East Hartford, Connecticut Research Joseph Wartman University of Illinois at Chicago Professor of Civil Engineering Nicholas Burmas University of Washington Chief, Office of Materials and FHWA Liaison Infrastructure California DOT Mary Huie Manager, Innovation/Technology Transfer Paul Carlson Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center Chief Technology Officer Road Infrastructure, Inc. AASHTO Liaison Allison Hardt Glenn Page Deputy Director, Policy and Research Associate Program Director, Project Delivery Maryland SHA TRB Liaison Eric Harm Consultant, Formerly Illinois DOT Rich Cunard Windermere, Florida Engineer of Traffic and Operations Technical Activities Division Denise Inda Chief Traffic Operations Engineer NCHRP/CRP Staff Nevada DOT Lori Sundstrom Patricia Leavenworth Deputy Director, Cooperative Research Deputy Administrator/Chief Engineer Programs Massachusetts DOT Christopher Hedges Michelle Owens Director, Cooperative Research Programs State Research and Development Engineer NCHRP IDEA Staff Alabama DOT Inam Jawed Emily Parkany Manager, NCHRP IDEA Program Research Manager Demisha Williams Vermont Agency for Transportation Senior Program Assistant, IDEA Programs March 27, 2020 Dear Transportation Professional: I had the pleasure of serving as a member and chair of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program’s (NCHRP) Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) program for twelve years.
    [Show full text]
  • FIT EMD Year 3 Subtask 5 Final Report Optimizing Selection of Sites
    Impacts of Environmental Muck Dredging at Florida Institute of Technology 2017-2018, Final Report, November 2019 Optimizing Selection of Sites for Environmental Dredging in the Indian River Lagoon System (Subtask 5) IRL BRL Map of Indian River Lagoon (IRL) and Banana River Lagoon (BRL) in Brevard County showing 20 optimal sites for muck projects with the highest priority site (#1) having the highest flux of dissolved nitrogen from sediments and the second lowest diversity in benthic fauna. John H. Trefry, Kevin B. Johnson, Austin L. Fox, Xiao Ma Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida 32901 November 2019 i Impacts of Environmental Muck Dredging at Florida Institute of Technology 2017-2018, Final Report, November 2019 Impacts of Environmental Muck Dredging 2017-2018 Optimizing Selection of Sites for Environmental Dredging in the Indian River Lagoon System (Subtask 5) Final Project Report Submitted to Brevard County Natural Resources Management Department 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Building A, Room 219 Viera, Florida 32940 Funding provided by the Florida legislature as part of DEP Grant Agreement No. NS005 – Brevard County Muck Dredging Co-Principal Investigators: John H. Trefry and Kevin B. Johnson Indian River Lagoon Research Institute Florida Institute of Technology 150 West University Boulevard Melbourne, Florida 32901 November 2019 ii Impacts of Environmental Muck Dredging at Florida Institute of Technology 2017-2018, Final Report, November 2019 Optimizing Selection of Sites for Environmental Dredging in the Indian River Lagoon System (Subtask 5) John H. Trefry, Kevin B. Johnson, Austin L. Fox, Xiao Ma Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida 32901 Executive Summary Fine-grained, organic-rich sediments, locally called Indian River Lagoon (IRL) muck, are anoxic and uninhabitable to benthic fauna and seagrasses.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Center Upgrades Local
    MELBOURNE WEST MELBOURNE Mike Willis CONSTRUCTION LLC ROOFING321-254-7176 & 1901 N. Harbor City Blvd. 2018 ADER Melbourne, FL 34935 E S R ’ Owner www.mikewillisroofing.com C E Mike Willis Licensed & Insured H1O I C BREVARD'S PREMIER Roofing Contractor # RESIDENTIAL ROOFING COMPANY CCC1327501 @HometownNewsBrevard @hometownnewsbrevard @HometownNewsBre Certified General Contractor # CGC1509962 Pool Contractor # Vol. 15, No. 50 www.HometownNewsBrevard.com Friday, June 28, 2019 CPC1458901 R PAINTER WICKED CUTE NICE CATCH TO NEW HEIGHTS YOU I AM I AM YOUR NEIGHBOR, Riley is an 8-year-old George Matthews The Daugherty and Most roofs completed Pekingese who loves caught a 22-inch black Wade's bring a copy of within 2 weeks walks, car rides and drum on Father's Day the Hometown News to of signing! A fresh coat of paint Call today! can give your home a cuddling with her owner the French Alps whole new look METAL, SHINGLE & TILE REROOFS • REPAIRS • REMODELS • POOLS PET OF THE WEEK 10 CATCH OF THE WEEK 14 TOURING WITH THE TOWNIES 12 INTERIOR/EXTERIOR PAINTING • RENOVATIONS • COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL Community Mousing around Transit Calendar For the complete Community center Calender listings, go to www. hometownnewsbrevard.com/ calendar/community/ Friday, June 28 upgrades Free Movie Friday: On Friday, June 28 at the Sunflower House at the local hub Merritt Island Square Mall, located at 777 E By Brittany Mulligan Merritt Island Causeway [email protected] Ste. 201 in Merritt Island is Free Movie Friday. The BREVARD COUNTY — The Space event is a refreshment Coast Area Transit has been providing provided free showing of riders access to Brevard County, from " Five Feet Apart" at 1 Mims to Bayside Lakes, with affordable p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • USEPA Decision to Add 7 Waterbody-Pollutant Combinations
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORG lA 30303·8960 SEP 3 0 2014 Herschel T. Vinyard Jr. Secretary Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 Subject: Final Action on Florida' s 2012 Basin Group 5 Update, as amended, to the Section 303(d) List for the State of Florida Dear Secretary Vinyard: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, has completed its review of Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Basin Group 5 Update, as amended, to Florida's section 303(d) list. The Basin Group 5 Update, as amended, identifies water quality limited segments (WQLS) in the Basin Group 5, pursuant to section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). We reviewed the original May 23, 2012 submittal, along with several amendments to this original submittal which FDEP submitted between May 2012 and April 2014. These amendments include the February 20, 2014, submittal of amendments adopted by Secretarial Order, which revised the originally-submitted Verified Lists to include additional WQLS and the originally-submitted Delist Lists to remove some WQLS, thereby retaining them on the section 303(d) list. The EPA has determined that Florida's 2012 Basin Group 5 Update, as amended, substantially meets the intent of section 303(d) of the CW A and the EPA's implementing regulations and is partially approving that submission. Specifically, the EPA approves Florida' s decision to include additional Basin Group 5 waters and associated pollutants on the section 303(d) list, as set out in Appendix B of the enclosed Decision Document.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Range Transportation Plan
    SPACE COAST TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTED | OCTOBER 8, 2015 THE PREPARATION OF THIS REPORT HAS BEEN FINANCED IN PART THROUGH GRANT(S) FROM THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AND FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNDER THE STATE PLANNING AND RESEARCH PROGRAM, SECTION 505 [OR METROPOLITAN PLANNING PROGRAM, SECTION 104(F)] OF TITLE 23, U.S. CODE. THE CONTENTS OF THIS REPORT DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OFFICIAL VIEWS OR POLICY OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. SPACE COAST TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION ADOPTED | OCTOBER 8, 2015 prepared by: TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS x PUBLIC NOTICE 47 COMMITTEES xii ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND TITLE VI 47 LRTP AMENDMENT & xvi INITIATION WORKSHOPS 48 MODIFICATION PROCESS SURVEY 50 RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION xix 3B: METAPLAN APPROACH 52 FEDERAL PLANNING REQUIREMENTS xx METAPLAN SYNTHESIS 52 BICYCLING AND WALKING 53 CHAPTER ONE: BREVARD’S 19 BUSES AND RAIL 53 NEED FOR A CULTURE SHIFT SEAPORT, AIRPORTS, AND SPACEPORT 54 ROADWAYS 57 A NON-TRADITIONAL UPDATE PROCESS 22 INFILL AND MIXED-USE, HIGHER-DENSITY, 59 ORGANIZATION OF REPORT 24 OR CLUSTERED DEVELOPMENT GATHERING INPUT 24 PARKING 59 SCENARIO PLANNING 24 TRANSPORTATION SYMPOSIUM 60 VISIONING 24 3C: BALANCING PLANNING 65 CORRIDOR PLANNING 25 AND THE ENVIRONMENT PRIORITIZATION 25 ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICES 66 REVENUES 26 AND POLICIES 2040 COST FEASIBLE PLAN 26 PROGRAMS MONITORING 67 POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES BEYOND 2040 28 ETDM 68 MITIGATION BANKING 70 CHAPTER TWO: THE ENVIRONMENTALLY ENDANGERED
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Proposed Budget
    CITY OF MELBOURNE, FL FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022 PROPOSED BUDGET City of Melbourne, Florida 2021‐2022 Proposed Budget City of Melbourne, Florida 2021‐2022 Proposed Budget Table of Contents Page City Manager’s Letter of Transmittal ........................................................................................ CM‐1 Annual Budget ........................................................................................................................ 1 Annual Budget by Fund ................................................................................................................... 3 City of Melbourne Organizational Chart ......................................................................................... 5 All Department Positions ................................................................................................................ 6 General Fund ........................................................................................................................... 9 Budget Summary ........................................................................................................................... 13 Pie Charts ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Revenue Detail .............................................................................................................................. 16 Summary of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance ........................................... 21 Division
    [Show full text]
  • Muck Dredging Research Project Management (Subtask 1)
    Impacts of Environmental Muck Dredging 2017-2018 Muck Dredging Research Project Management (Subtask 1) Final Project Report to Brevard County Natural Resources Management Department Funding provided by the Florida Legislature as part of DEP Grant Agreement No. NS005 – Brevard County Muck Dredging March 2017 IRL Palm Bay Δ Muck Thickness John G. Windsor Indian River Lagoon Research Institute Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida February 2021 Impacts of Environmental Muck Dredging, Florida Institute of Technology, Year 3, 2017-2018 Final Report for Subtask 1, Muck Dredging Research Project Management, February 2021 Cover Image: Contour map of muck thickness in Turkey Creek from the adjacent Indian River Lagoon (IRL) to the Florida East Coast (FEC) railroad bridge. (Courtesy of Robert Trocine) Impacts of Environmental Muck Dredging, Florida Institute of Technology, Year 3, 2017-2018 Final Report for Subtask 1, Muck Dredging Research Project Management, February 2021 Impacts of Environmental Muck Dredging 2017-2018 Muck Dredging Research Project Management (Subtask 1) Final Project Report Submitted to Brevard County Natural Resources Management Department 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Building A, Room 219 Viera, Florida 32940 Funding provided by the Florida Legislature as part of DEP Grant Agreement No. NS005 – Brevard County Muck Dredging Principal Investigator: John G. Windsor Indian River Lagoon Research Institute 150 West University Boulevard Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida 32901 February 2021 Impacts
    [Show full text]