DOCSLIB.ORG

North Indian River Lagoon BMAP Was Completed in September 2012; And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Indian River Lagoon BMAP Was Completed in September 2012; And BASIN MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN for the Implementation of Total Maximum Daily Loads for Nutrients Adopted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in the Indian River Lagoon Basin North Indian River Lagoon developed by the North Indian River Lagoon Stakeholders in cooperation with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Bureau of Watershed Restoration Tallahassee, FL 32399 January 2013 FINAL North Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan – 2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: The North Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan was prepared as part of a statewide watershed management approach to restore and protect Florida’s water quality. It was developed by the North Indian River Lagoon stakeholders, identified below, with participation from affected local, regional, and state governmental interests; elected officials and citizens; and private interests. - = Empty cell ALLOCATION ENTITIES AGENCIES OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES Florida Department of Agriculture and Algae Collection Technology, Agricultural Producers Consumer Services Inc. Florida Department of Environmental Brevard County Applied Ecology Protection Applied Technology and Volusia County Florida Farm Bureau Federation Management Indian River Lagoon National Estuary City of Cocoa BSE Consultants Program City of Edgewater St. Johns River Water Management District Cape Canaveral Scientific, Inc. City of Indian Harbour Beach - CDM Smith City of Melbourne - Citizens City of Oak Hill - E Sciences, Inc. City of Rockledge - Eco Sense International City of Titusville - England Thims and Miller Florida Department of Transportation - Indian Riverkeeper District 5 Jones Edmunds and Kennedy Space Center - Associates Town of Indialantic - Marine Resources Council Town of Palm Shores - Masteller and Moler, Inc, Town of Melbourne Village - SAIC Florida Power and Light – - Wildwood Consulting, Inc. Cape Canaveral Power Plant Reliant Energy – Indian River Power Plant - - ii FINAL North Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan – 2013 For additional information on Total Maximum Daily Loads and the watershed management approach in the North Indian River Lagoon, contact: Mary Paulic, Basin Coordinator Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Restoration, Watershed Planning and Coordination Section 2600 Blair Stone Road, Mail Station 3565 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 Email: [email protected] Phone: (850) 245–8560 iii FINAL North Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan – 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................. VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ X CHAPTER 1 : CONTEXT, PURPOSE, AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN ............................ 1 1.1 Water Quality Standards and Total Maximum Daily Loads .......................... 1 1.2 TMDL Implementation ...................................................................................... 4 1.3 The North Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan ................. 4 1.3.1 Stakeholder Involvement .................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Plan Purpose and Scope ................................................................................. 5 1.3.3 BMAP Approach .............................................................................................. 5 1.3.4 Pollutant Reduction and Discharge Allocations ................................................ 9 1.3.5 TMDLs in the North Indian River Lagoon Basin ................................................ 9 1.4 Assumptions and Considerations Regarding TMDL Implementation ......................................................................................... 10 1.4.1 Assumptions ...................................................................................................10 1.4.2 Considerations ................................................................................................11 1.5 Future Growth in the Basin ........................................................................... 13 1.6 Relation of the BMAP to Other Restoration Plans ...................................... 14 1.7 Economic Benefits of the IRL System .......................................................... 14 CHAPTER 2 : NORTH INDIAN RIVER LAGOON BASIN SETTING ............................ 16 2.1 Basin Hydrology ............................................................................................. 16 2.2 Land Use Coverage ........................................................................................ 16 2.3 Seagrass Depth Limit Changes .................................................................... 18 CHAPTER 3 : POLLUTANT SOURCES AND ANTICIPATED OUTCOMES ............... 21 3.1 Point Source Facilities ................................................................................... 21 3.2 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems .................................................. 21 3.2.1 NPDES MS4 Phase II Stormwater Permit Requirements ................................22 3.3 Non-MS4 Stormwater Sources ...................................................................... 23 3.4 Agriculture ...................................................................................................... 24 3.5 Anticipated Outcomes of BMAP Implementation ........................................ 24 CHAPTER 4 : DETAILED ALLOCATIONS .................................................................. 25 4.1 Calculating Baseline Loads........................................................................... 25 4.2 De Minimus Determination ............................................................................ 26 4.3 Target Load Per Acre ..................................................................................... 28 4.4 Allocations and Required Reductions ......................................................... 29 4.5 Allocations by Source ................................................................................... 31 4.5.1 NPDES Facilities .............................................................................................31 4.5.2 MS4s ..............................................................................................................32 4.5.3 Non-MS4 Urban Stormwater ...........................................................................32 iv FINAL North Indian River Lagoon Basin Management Action Plan – 2013 4.5.4 Agriculture .......................................................................................................33 CHAPTER 5 : MANAGEMENT ACTIONS .................................................................... 34 5.1 MS4 Projects To Meet Allocations ................................................................ 34 5.1.1 MS4 Projects in North A ..................................................................................35 5.1.2 MS4 Projects in North B ..................................................................................35 5.2 Non-MS4 Urban Stormwater Projects To Meet Allocations ........................ 36 5.2.1 Non-MS4 Projects in North A ..........................................................................36 5.2.2 Non-MS4 Projects in North B ..........................................................................37 5.3 Provisional BMPs ........................................................................................... 37 5.3.1 Floating Islands ...............................................................................................37 5.3.2 Public Education and Outreach .......................................................................38 5.3.3 Muck Removal ................................................................................................38 5.3.4 Aquatic Plant Harvesting .................................................................................39 5.3.5 Water Control Structures .................................................................................39 5.4 Agriculture ...................................................................................................... 39 5.4.1 Agricultural Producers’ Responsibilities under the FWRA ...............................43 5.4.2 Agricultural BMPs ...........................................................................................43 5.4.3 FDACS OAWP Role in BMP Implementation and Follow-Up ..........................45 5.4.4 FDEP and SJRWMD Roles in BMP Implementation .......................................46 5.4.5 BMP Enrollment Goals and Load Reduction Estimates ...................................46 CHAPTER 6 : ASSESSING PROGRESS AND MAKING CHANGES.......................... 53 6.1 Seagrass Target Evaluation .......................................................................... 53 6.2 Tracking Implementation ............................................................................... 53 6.3 Adaptive Management Measures .................................................................. 54 6.4 Seagrass and Water Quality Monitoring ...................................................... 54 6.4.1 Objectives .......................................................................................................54 6.4.2 Monitoring Parameters, Frequency, and Network ...........................................55 6.4.3 Discharge Monitoring ......................................................................................57
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019
    FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MARINE MAMMAL PATHOBIOLOGY LABORATORY 2019 Preliminary Manatee Mortality Table with 5-Year Summary From: 01/01/2019 To: 11/22/2019 County Date Field ID Sex Size Waterway City Probable Cause (cm) Nassau 01/01/2019 MNE19001 M 275 Nassau River Yulee Natural: Cold Stress Hillsborough 01/01/2019 MNW19001 M 221 Hillsborough Bay Apollo Beach Natural: Cold Stress Monroe 01/01/2019 MSW19001 M 275 Florida Bay Flamingo Undetermined: Other Lee 01/01/2019 MSW19002 M 170 Caloosahatchee River North Fort Myers Verified: Not Recovered Manatee 01/02/2019 MNW19002 M 213 Braden River Bradenton Natural: Cold Stress Putnam 01/03/2019 MNE19002 M 175 Lake Ocklawaha Palatka Undetermined: Too Decomposed Broward 01/03/2019 MSE19001 M 246 North Fork New River Fort Lauderdale Natural: Cold Stress Volusia 01/04/2019 MEC19002 U 275 Mosquito Lagoon Oak Hill Undetermined: Too Decomposed St. Lucie 01/04/2019 MSE19002 F 226 Indian River Fort Pierce Natural: Cold Stress Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19003 F 264 Whiskey Creek Fort Myers Human Related: Watercraft Collision Lee 01/04/2019 MSW19004 F 285 Mullock Creek Fort Myers Undetermined: Too Decomposed Citrus 01/07/2019 MNW19003 M 275 Gulf of Mexico Crystal River Verified: Not Recovered Collier 01/07/2019 MSW19005 M 270 Factory Bay Marco Island Natural: Other Lee 01/07/2019 MSW19006 U 245 Pine Island Sound Bokeelia Verified: Not Recovered Lee 01/08/2019 MSW19007 M 254 Matlacha Pass Matlacha Human Related: Watercraft Collision Citrus 01/09/2019 MNW19004 F 245 Homosassa River Homosassa
    [Show full text]
  • Year 2 Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries
    Year 2 Data Summary Report: Nekton of Sarasota Bay and a Comparison of Nekton Community Structure in Adjacent Southwest Florida Estuaries T.C. MacDonald; E. Weather; R.F. Jones; R.H. McMichael, Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute 100 Eighth Avenue Southeast St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5095 Prepared for Sarasota Bay Estuary Program 111 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 200W Sarasota, Florida 34236 June 4, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ vii SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... ix INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Study Area ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. Forest Service Forest Health Protection Gypsy Moth Catches On
    U. S. Forest Service Forest Health Protection 11/19/2014 Gypsy Moth Catches on Federal Lands 1 Alabama 2014 2013 Traps Positive Moths Traps Positive Moths Agency/Facility Deployed Traps Trapped Deployed Traps Trapped ACOE WALTER F. GEORGE LAKE, AL 5 0 0 5 0 0 WEST POINT LAKE, AL 3 0 0 3 0 0 F&WS MOUNTAIN LONGLEAF NWR 4 0 0 4 0 0 State total: 12 0 0 12 0 0 U. S. Forest Service Forest Health Protection 11/19/2014 Gypsy Moth Catches on Federal Lands 2 Florida 2014 2013 Traps Positive Moths Traps Positive Moths Agency/Facility Deployed Traps Trapped Deployed Traps Trapped USAF EGLIN AFB 28 0 0 0 0 0 F&WS CHASSAHOWITZKA NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 FLORIDA PANTHER NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 J.N. DING DARLING NWR 6 0 0 6 0 0 LAKE WOODRUFF NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 LOWER SUWANNEE NWR 4 0 0 4 0 0 LOXAHATCHEE NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 MERRITT ISLAND NWR 6 0 0 6 0 0 ST. MARKS NWR 10 0 0 5 0 0 ST. VINCENT NWR 5 0 0 5 0 0 NPS BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVE 5 0 0 5 0 0 DE SOTO NATIONAL MEMORIAL 5 0 0 5 0 0 EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK 5 0 0 5 0 0 FT. CAROLINE NATIONAL MEMORIAL 6 0 0 6 0 0 FT. MATANZAS NM 12 0 0 4 0 0 GULF ISLANDS NATIONAL SEASHORE 18 0 0 5 0 0 TIMUCUAN ECOLOGICAL & HISTORIC PRESERVE 12 1 1 6 0 0 USFS Apalachicola NF APALACHICOLA RANGER DISTRICT 10 0 0 10 0 0 WAKULLA RANGER DISTRICT 20 0 0 20 0 0 Ocala NF LAKE GEORGE RANGER DISTRICT 44 0 0 18 1 1 SEMINOLE RANGER DISTRICT 14 0 0 14 0 0 Osceola NF OSCEOLA RANGER DISTRICT 15 0 0 15 0 0 US NAVY PENSACOLA NAS 30 0 0 0 0 0 State total: 265 1 1 159 1 1 U.
    [Show full text]
  • January 6, 1997 KSC Contact: Joel Wells KSC Release No
    January 6, 1997 KSC Contact: Joel Wells KSC Release No. 1-97 Note to Editors/News Directors: KSC TO CELEBRATE GRAND OPENING OF APOLLO/SATURN V CENTER JAN. 8 On Wednesday, Jan. 8, news media representatives will have several opportunities to interview former Apollo astronauts, NASA and KSC officials, and Space Shuttle astronauts at the new Apollo/Saturn V Center. From 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. members of the media will be able to interview several former Apollo astronauts at the Apollo/Saturn V Center. Media interested in conducting interviews during this time block must contact Melissa Tomasso, KSC Visitor Center, at (407) 449-4254 by close of business on Jan. 7. She will schedule all interview appointments. Media members should arrive at the KSC Press Site 30 minutes before their scheduled interview time for transport to the Apollo/Saturn V Center. In addition, a formal grand opening gala is planned for Wednesday evening. Several Apollo astronauts will also be available for interview at 6 p.m. at the Apollo/Saturn V Center. Media interested in this opportunity must be at the KSC Press Site by 5:30 p.m. for transport to the new facility. Invited guests and media wishing to attend the gala at the regular time will meet at the KSC Visitor Center (KSCVC) between 6:30 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. for transport to the Apollo/Saturn V Center. A tour of the new facility’s shows and exhibits is included. A ceremony featuring presentations from NASA Administrator Dan Goldin, KSC Director Jay Honeycutt, and former astronauts John Young and Eugene Cernan will begin at 8 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Rob Patten: Creating a Legacy for Coastal Island Sanctuaries
    SUMMER 2011 2011 Audubon Assembly: Take Action for Florida’s Special Places October 14-15 Connect to Florida’s Special Places Guarding the Everglades Treasure 2011 Florida Audubon Society John Elting, Chairman, Leadership Florida Audubon Society Eric Draper Executive Director, Audubon of Florida President, Florida Audubon Our April board of directors meeting was a pivotal point for Florida Audubon Society (FAS). It was at that moment in time, surrounded by a chorus of birds at the Chinsegut Nature Center near Board of Directors FAS-owned Ahhochee Hill, that I think we all realized how far we had come this fiscal year. Our John W. Elting, Chairman Executive Director Eric Draper, our committed board and tireless staff had a lot to celebrate. Joe Ambrozy, Vice Chairman Sheri Ford Lewin, Board Secretary Even during tough economic times, we were ending the year in a positive financial position, Doug Santoni, Treasurer something other environmental groups are struggling with this year. We have achieved 100 per- Sandy Batchelor, Esq. cent board giving, both financially and in terms of gifts of time and talent. Our marketing efforts, Jim Brady particularly the expanded focus on social media, have resulted in a strong online community that Henry Dean, Esq. helped protect Florida’s state parks on three different occasions this year. Improved outreach and John Flanigan, Esq. regional events are building engagement in Audubon throughout Florida. The board’s science Charles Geanangel committee is taking our applied science work to new levels including accelerated involvement John Hood of citizen scientists. Lastly, we are beginning to work at the local, state and national level as One Reid Hughes Audubon.
    [Show full text]
  • 1987 (5.2Mb Pdf)
    1'4evvs National Aeronautics and Space Administration JohnF.KennedySpace Center Kennedy Space Center, Florida 32899 AC305 867-2468 , ... I For Release: David W. Garrett April 13, 1987 Headquarters, Washington, D.C. (Phone: 202/453-8400) RELEASE: 87-56 SHEEHAN NAMED ASSOCIATE AE_INISTRATOR FOR _NICATIONS William Sheehan has been appointed Associate Administrator for Cournnunications, NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C., effective May 4, 1987. This new position, announced in February 1987, reflects the importance that NASA management places on full and complete communications within and outside the agency. Sheehan will be the principal advisor to the Administrator and Deputy Administrator on public affairs matters. He will be responsible for policy level management and direction of NASA's public affairs, television development and internal communications organizat ions. Sheehan comes to NASA from The Executive Television Workshop, Inc., where he was director of the Detroit office. Prior to this position he was executive director, Corporate Public Affairs, Ford Motor Co. and vice president Public Affairs, Ford Aerospace and Corrrnunications Corp., Detroit. In 1974, Sheehan was appointed president of ABC News, a position he held until 1977. He had held various positions at ABC since 1961 including five years as a national and foreign correspondent. He was a radio and television anchorman, labor reporter and chief of ABC News' London bureau between 1961 and 1966. In 1966, he returned to New York to become vice president, Television News,_"';iseni.o.r _ vice president and then president, ABC News. Recently, Sheehan has been/working in public television on the local and national level as chairman of the board of station WTVS of Detroit and is a member of the board of directors and on the executive committee of the Public Broadcasting Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard, DHS § 80.525
    Coast Guard, DHS Pt. 80 Madagascar Singapore 80.715 Savannah River. Maldives Surinam 80.717 Tybee Island, GA to St. Simons Is- Morocco Tonga land, GA. Oman Trinidad 80.720 St. Simons Island, GA to Amelia Is- land, FL. Pakistan Tobago Paraguay 80.723 Amelia Island, FL to Cape Canaveral, Tunisia Peru FL. Philippines Turkey 80.727 Cape Canaveral, FL to Miami Beach, Portugal United Republic of FL. Republic of Korea Cameroon 80.730 Miami Harbor, FL. 80.735 Miami, FL to Long Key, FL. [CGD 77–075, 42 FR 26976, May 26, 1977. Redes- ignated by CGD 81–017, 46 FR 28153, May 26, PUERTO RICO AND VIRGIN ISLANDS 1981; CGD 95–053, 61 FR 9, Jan. 2, 1996] SEVENTH DISTRICT PART 80—COLREGS 80.738 Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. DEMARCATION LINES GULF COAST GENERAL SEVENTH DISTRICT Sec. 80.740 Long Key, FL to Cape Sable, FL. 80.01 General basis and purpose of demarca- 80.745 Cape Sable, FL to Cape Romano, FL. tion lines. 80.748 Cape Romano, FL to Sanibel Island, FL. ATLANTIC COAST 80.750 Sanibel Island, FL to St. Petersburg, FL. FIRST DISTRICT 80.753 St. Petersburg, FL to Anclote, FL. 80.105 Calais, ME to Cape Small, ME. 80.755 Anclote, FL to the Suncoast Keys, 80.110 Casco Bay, ME. FL. 80.115 Portland Head, ME to Cape Ann, MA. 80.757 Suncoast Keys, FL to Horseshoe 80.120 Cape Ann, MA to Marblehead Neck, Point, FL. MA. 80.760 Horseshoe Point, FL to Rock Island, 80.125 Marblehead Neck, MA to Nahant, FL.
    [Show full text]
  • Currently the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems
    CRITICALLY ERODED BEACHES IN FLORIDA Updated, June 2009 BUREAU OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida's erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly seventy coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or noncritical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and noncritically eroded. This report is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. A county index is provided on page 13, which includes the date of the last revision. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available. This report is also available on the following web site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/uublications/tech-rut.htm APPROVED BY Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Bureau Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems June, 2009 Introduction In 1986, pursuant to Sections 161.101 and 161.161, Florida Statutes, the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores (now the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems) was charged with the responsibility to identify those beaches of the state which are critically eroding and to develop and maintain a comprehensive long-term management plan for their restoration. In 1989, a first list of erosion areas was developed based upon an abbreviated definition of critical erosion. That list included 217.6 miles of critical erosion and another 114.8 miles of noncritical erosion statewide.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Document Regarding Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Section 303(D) List Amendments for Basin Group
    DECISION DOCUMENT REGARDING FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION’S SECTION 303(d) LIST AMENDMENTS FOR BASIN GROUP THREE Prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 Water Management Division May 12, 2010 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 3 II. Statutory and Regulatory Background 6 A. Identification of Water Quality Limited Segments (WQLSs) for Inclusion on the Section 303(d) List 6 B. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 6 C. Priority Ranking 7 III. Analysis of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Submission 7 A. Florida’s Group Three 2010 Update 8 1. Florida’s Water Quality Standards and Section 303(d) List Development 8 2. List Development Methodology and Data Assessment 10 3. Public Participation Process 11 4. Consideration of Existing and Readily Available Water Quality-Related Data and Information 12 B. Review of FDEP’s Identification of Waters 14 1. Review of FDEP’s Data Guidelines 15 2. No Pollutant Identified for Impairment 18 3. Aquatic Life Use Impairment 18 4. Primary and Secondary Recreational Use Support 23 5. Fish and Shellfish Consumption Use Support 24 6. Drinking Water Use Support and Protection of Human Health 25 1 Florida §303(d) List Decision Document May 12, 2010 C. Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters 26 1. FDEP’s Addition of Water Quality Limited Segments 26 2. Section 303(d) List Delistings 26 3. Other Pollution Control Requirements 27 4. EPA Identified Waters 30 5. Priority Ranking and Targeting 30 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian River Lagoon Report Card
    Ponce Inlet M o s q u it o L a g o o B n N o r t h Edgewater M o s q u D INDIAN RIVER it o L a g o Oak Hill o n C e n t r a LAGOON D+ l REPORT CARD Turnbull Creek Grading water quality and habitat health M o s q u Big Flounder i Creek to L a go on S o C- Grades ut F h Lagoon Region 2018 2019 Mosquito Lagoon North N BC o r t Mosquito Lagoon Central h D D I n d Mosquito Lagoon South i a n C- C- R Titusville i v Banana River Lagoon e r FF L a g North IRL o o n F FF Central IRL-North FF Central IRL - South D+ C F South IRL - North F D Merritt Island South IRL - Central F F B a South IRL - South Port St. John n a F D n a R i v e r Grades L a Port Canaveral g 2018 2019 o Tributaries o n Turnbull Creek Cocoa F D+ Big Flounder Creek F F Horse Creek B B- Cocoa Eau Gallie River Rockledge Beach D- D+ Crane Creek F D- Turkey Creek D- D Goat Creek D D+ Sebastian Estuary Sebastian North Prong D+ C- D- C- Sebastian South Prong D- C+ B- C-54 Canal Taylor Creek C- C Satellite D- D+ Horse Beach St. Lucie Estuary Creek C St. Lucie River - North Fork D+ Eau Gallie St. Lucie River - South Fork F F River F F + Lower Loxahatchee D Middle Loxahatchee B B+ Melbourne C+ B- Crane Upper Loxahatchee Creek Lagoon House Loxahatchee Southwest Fork B B+ - B- B C D Turkey e n F *A grade of B is meeting Creek t r Palm a l the regulatory target I Bay n d i a n R i v D e r Goat L LEGEND Creek a g o o n Health Scores N o r t h D+ A 90-100 (Very Good) C- C- B 80-89 (Good) Sebastian Inlet Sebastian Sebastian C 70-79 (Average) North Prong Estuary C-54 Canal Sebastian D 60-69 (Poor) Sebastian South Prong F 0-59 (Very Poor) C Wabasso C+ Beach Winter Beach C e n t r a l Gifford I n d i The Indian River Lagoon a n R i v C e total health score is r Vero Beach L a g o o n S (F+) o 58 u t a slight improvement from the previous year's score h of 52 (F).
    [Show full text]
  • Indian River Lagoon: Lake Kissimmee Lessons, Challenges and Indian River Lagoon
    Upper Chain of Lakes Indian River Lagoon: Lake Kissimmee Lessons, Challenges and Indian River Lagoon Opportunities Kissimmee River St. Lucie Estuary Lake Okeechobee Caloosahatchee Estuary Mark Perry, Executive Director Everglades Florida Oceanographic Society February 5, 2015 Biscayne Bay Florida Bay Coral Reefs Cool water Warm water Indian River Lagoon •2100 plant species •2200 animal species (700 fish, 310 birds) Most Biodiverse Estuary in North America Six Lagoon Segments – Six Inlets – Seagrass, major habitat Historic Watershed-572,800 acres Current Watershed- 1,216,640 acres 24 Major Drainage Canals – C-44 (St. Lucie Canal) the largest in the watershed Major Population Increase 1960 to Present Major Problems in the Indian River Lagoon Loss of Seagrass Beds Loss of Mangrove Wetlands & Shorelines Mosquito Impoundments – Disconnected Habitat Major Alteration and Expansion Drainage System in Watershed Changes in Circulation and Tidal Influences Major Increase in Nutrient Levels and Sediment Loads Major Increase in Boating, Fishing, Marina & Waterfront activity Increase in Invasive & Exotic Plants and Animals The ‘perfect storm’ , 2011 superbloom, 2012 brown tide bloom ??? 170,000 acres of Lagoon bottom appropriate for seagrass habitat. Less than 84,000 acres support seagrass. More than 50% of the seagrass beds have been lost from the Lagoon. Direct Effects on Fisheries Economically important Spotted Seatrout fishery decline from overfishing and inhibited reproduction by low salinity levels in the estuary. Bottlenose Dolphins in Indian River Lagoon have Skin Disorders such as Dolphin Pox and Lobomycosis- (FAU HBOI) Sea Turtles in the Indian River Lagoon have Skin Disorders such as Fibropapilloma Upper Chain of Lakes flow south into Lake Kissimmee Lake Kissimmee flows south into the Kissimmee River – 105-mile Oxbow River with 2-mile-wide floodplain Water takes 6-8 Months to reach Lake Okeechobee Lake Okeechobee flows south through “River “River of Grass”, Everglades - 60-mile of wide shallow (1-foot deep) river flowing Grass” at 1 mile in 4 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Lagoons of East Centeral Florida
    1974 (11th) Vol.1 Technology Today for The Space Congress® Proceedings Tomorrow Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Studies On The Lagoons Of East Centeral Florida J. A. Lasater Professor of Oceanography, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida T. A. Nevin Professor of Microbiology Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Lasater, J. A. and Nevin, T. A., "Studies On The Lagoons Of East Centeral Florida" (1974). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 2. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1974-11th-v1/session-8/2 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDIES ON THE LAGOONS OF EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA Dr. J. A. Lasater Dr. T. A. Nevin Professor of Oceanography Professor of Microbiology Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida ABSTRACT There are no significant fresh water streams entering the Indian River Lagoon south of the Ponce de Leon Inlet; Detailed examination of the water quality parameters of however, the Halifax River estuary is just north of the the lagoons of East Central Florida were begun in 1969. Inlet. The principal sources of fresh water entering the This investigation was subsequently expanded to include Indian River Lagoon appear to be direct land runoff and a other aspects of these waters. General trends and a number of small man-made canals. The only source of statistical model are beginning to emerge for the water fresh water entering the Banana River is direct land run­ quality parameters.
    [Show full text]