DOCSLIB.ORG

Blackdown Rings – the Norman Involvement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blackdown Rings – the Norman Involvement Blackdown Rings – The Norman involvement Blackdown Rings – The Norman involvement Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Britain • Celts - a mosaic of named peoples (Trinovantes, Silures, Cornovii, Selgovae, etc) – little sign of collective identity • Romans invade and many people arrive and settle Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Britain • Celts - a mosaic of named peoples (Trinovantes, Silures, Cornovii, Selgovae, etc) – little sign of collective identity • Romans invade and many people arrive and settle • Romans leave over a period of ~ 100 years settlers remain • By the 5th century A.D. barbarian tribes were attacking other parts of the Roman Emperor Honorius decided that the Roman legions in Britain were needed elsewhere. He sent a letter to the people of Britain telling them the soldiers had to leave. They must fight the Saxons and invaders on their own. Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Britain • Celts - a mosaic of named peoples (Trinovantes, Silures, Cornovii, Selgovae, etc) – little sign of collective identity • Romans invade and many people arrive and settle • Romans leave over a period of ~ 100 years settlers remain • Saxons invade from their homelands in Northern Germany, Denmark and The Netherlands in the 5th centenary Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Britain • Celts - a mosaic of named peoples (Trinovantes, Silures, Cornovii, Selgovae, etc) – little sign of collective identity • Romans invade and many people arrive and settle • Romans leave over a period of ~ 100 years settlers remain • Ango-Saxons invade from their homelands in Northern Germany, Denmark and The Netherlands in the 5th centenary – they are here to stay and settle in England Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Britain • Celts - a mosaic of named peoples (Trinovantes, Silures, Cornovii, Selgovae, etc) – little sign of collective identity • Romans invade and many people arrive and settle • Romans leave over a period of ~ 100 years settlers remain • Ango-Saxons invade from their homelands in Northern Germany, Denmark and The Netherlands in the 5th centenary • Viking raids, incursions and invasions - from the Scandinavian countries: Denmark, Norway and Sweden – The name 'Viking' comes from a language called 'Old Norse' and means 'a pirate raid'. People who went off raiding in ships were said to be 'going Viking'. The Viking age in European history was about AD 700 to 1100 Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Britain • Celts - a mosaic of named peoples (Trinovantes, Silures, Cornovii, Selgovae, etc) – little sign of collective identity • Romans invade and many people arrive and settle • Romans leave over a period of ~ 100 years settlers remain • Ango-Saxons invade from their homelands in Northern Germany, Denmark and The Netherlands in the 5th centenary • Viking raids, incursions and invasions - from the Scandinavian countries: Denmark, Norway and Sweden – The name 'Viking' comes from a language called 'Old Norse' and means 'a pirate raid'. People who went off raiding in ships were said to be 'going Viking'. The Viking age in European history was about AD 700 to 1100 Normans • Vikings under the Viking chief named Rollo, from the same regions that invaded England, were given lands in the North of France at the beginning of the tenth century, the French King, Charles the Simple Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Britain • Celts - a mosaic of named peoples (Trinovantes, Silures, Cornovii, Selgovae, etc) – little sign of collective identity • Romans invade and many people arrive and settle • Romans leave over a period of ~ 100 years settlers remain • Ango-Saxons invade from their homelands in Northern Germany, Denmark and The Netherlands in the 5th centenary • Viking raids, incursions and invasions - from the Scandinavian countries: Denmark, Norway and Sweden – The name 'Viking' comes from a language called 'Old Norse' and means 'a pirate raid'. People who went off raiding in ships were said to be 'going Viking'. The Viking age in European history was about AD 700 to 1100 Mixed bag with strong family ties - Germany/Denmark/France/Netherlands/Norway & Sweden Normans • Vikings under the Viking chief named Rollo, from the same regions that invaded England, were given lands in the North of France at the beginning of the tenth century, the French King, Charles the Simple Who was who by 1066 and how related were they Britain • Celts - a mosaic of named peoples (Trinovantes, Silures, Cornovii, Selgovae, etc) – little sign of collective identity • Romans invade and many people arrive and settle • Romans leave over a period of ~ 100 years settlers remain • Ango-Saxons invade from their homelands in Northern Germany, Denmark and The Netherlands in the 5th centenary • Viking raids, incursions and invasions - from the Scandinavian countries: Denmark, Norway and Sweden – The name 'Viking' comes from a language called 'Old Norse' and means 'a pirate raid'. People who went off raiding in ships were said to be 'going Viking'. The Viking age in European history was about AD 700 to 1100 Mixed bag with strong family ties - Germany/Denmark/France/Netherlands/Norway & Sweden Normans • Vikings under the Viking chief named Rollo, from the same regions that invaded England, were given lands in the North of France at the beginning of the tenth century, the French King, Charles the Simple So, the Danes and the Normans who invaded in 1066 were actually our relatives and were related to the Brits - it really was a no more than family tiff - who was more powerful Edward the Confessor, King of England, dies childless in January 1066 • By the time the English King Edward died, there was no heirs with Edith. Lack of a clear heir led to a disputed succession process across Europe which resulted in several contenders, all related, laying claim to the English throne Edward the Confessor, King of England, dies childless in January 1066 • By the time the English King Edward died, there was no heirs with Edith. Lack of a clear heir led to a disputed succession process across Europe which resulted in several contenders, all related, laying claim to the English throne Edward the Confessor, King of England, dies childless in January 1066 • By the time the English King Edward died, there was no heirs with Edith. Lack of a clear heir led to a disputed succession process across Europe which resulted in several contenders, all related, laying claim to the English throne Edward the Confessor, King of England, dies childless in January 1066 • By the time the English King Edward died, there was no heirs with Edith. Lack of a clear heir led to a disputed succession process across Europe which resulted in several contenders, all related, laying claim to the English throne • The 3 main ones were: – Norway - Harald Hardrada Viking – Normandy - Duke William II Viking – England - Harald Godwinson Viking Edward the Confessor, King of England, dies childless in January 1066 • By the time the English King Edward died, there was no heirs with Edith. Lack of a clear heir led to a disputed succession process across Europe which resulted in several contenders, all related, laying claim to the English throne • The 3 main ones were: – Norway - Harald Hardrada Viking His claim to the throne was based on an agreement between his predecessor, Magnus the Good, and the earlier English king, Harthacnut, whereby if either died without heir, the other would inherit both England and Norway Edward the Confessor, King of England, dies childless in January 1066 • By the time the English King Edward died, there was no heirs with Edith. Lack of a clear heir led to a disputed succession process across Europe which resulted in several contenders, all related, laying claim to the English throne • The 3 main ones were: – Norway - Harald Hardrada Viking – Normandy - Duke William II Norman He claimed that he had been promised the throne by King Edward and that Harold had sworn agreement to this Edward the Confessor, King of England, dies childless in January 1066 • By the time the English King Edward died, there was no heirs with Edith. Lack of a clear heir led to a disputed succession process across Europe which resulted in several contenders, all related, laying claim to the English throne • The 3 main ones were: – Norway - Harald Hardrada Viking – Normandy - Duke William II Norman – England - Harald Godwinson Angol-Saxon brother to Queen Edith the pure Edward the Confessor, King of England, died childless in January 1066 • Edward's most local successor was the Earl of Wessex, Harold Godwinson, the richest and most powerful of the English aristocrats – Harold was at the death bed of Edward and told the English Earls that Edward had promised him the throne – Harold was elected king by the Witenagemot of England and crowned by the Archbishop of York, Ealdred – Harold was immediately challenged by his two powerful neighbouring rulers • King Harald III of Norway, - Harald Hardrada, and • Duke William II of Normandy Edward the Confessor, King of England, died childless in January 1066 • William and Harald at once set about assembling troops and ships to invade England The Invaders DANES BATTLE AXE; BOW; SPEAR; LANCE SHIELD; SWORD; Edward the Confessor, King of England, died childless in January 1066 • William and Harald at once set about assembling troops and ships to invade England The Invaders NORMANS BATTLE AXE; BOW; SPEAR; LANCE SHIELD; SWORD; Edward the Confessor, King of England, died childless in January
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This PDF File of Your Paper in the Later Iron Age Belongs to the Publishers Oxbow Books and Is Their Copyright
    This PDF file of your paper in The Later Iron Age belongs to the publishers Oxbow Books and is their copyright. As author you are licenced to make up to 50 offprints from it, but beyond that you may not publish it on the World Wide Web or in any other form. THE LATER IRON AGE IN BRITAIN AND BEYOND edited by Colin Haselgrove and Tom Moore Oxbow Books Published by Oxbow Books, Park End Place, Oxford OX1 1HN © Oxbow Books and the authors, 2007 ISBN 978-1-84217-252-0 1-84217-252-0 A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library This book is available direct from Oxbow Books, Park End Place, Oxford OX1 1HN (Phone: 01865-241249; Fax: 01865-794449) and The David Brown Books Company PO Box 511, Oakville, CT 06779, USA (Phone: 860-945-9329; Fax: 860-945-9468) or from our website www.oxbowbooks.com Cover by Christina Unwin based on an idea by Rachel Pope; reconstruction of burial by Simon James Printed in Great Britain at Short Run Press, Exeter Contents 1. New narratives of the Later Iron Age 1 Colin Haselgrove and Tom Moore 2. The dynamics of social change in Later Iron Age eastern and south-eastern England 16 c. 300 BC–AD 43. J. D. Hill 3. Life on the edge? Exchange, community, and identity in the Later Iron Age 41 of the Severn–Cotswolds Tom Moore 4. Central places or special places? The origins and development of ‘oppida’ in Hertfordshire 62 Stewart Bryant 5. Cultural choices in the ‘British Eastern Channel Area’ in the Late Pre-Roman Iron Age 81 Sue Hamilton 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410
    no nonsense Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47–410 – interpretation ltd interpretation Contract number 1446 May 2011 no nonsense–interpretation ltd 27 Lyth Hill Road Bayston Hill Shrewsbury SY3 0EW www.nononsense-interpretation.co.uk Cadw would like to thank Richard Brewer, Research Keeper of Roman Archaeology, Amgueddfa Cymru – National Museum Wales, for his insight, help and support throughout the writing of this plan. Roman Conquest, Occupation and Settlement of Wales AD 47-410 Cadw 2011 no nonsense-interpretation ltd 2 Contents 1. Roman conquest, occupation and settlement of Wales AD 47410 .............................................. 5 1.1 Relationship to other plans under the HTP............................................................................. 5 1.2 Linking our Roman assets ....................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Sites not in Wales .................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Criteria for the selection of sites in this plan .......................................................................... 9 2. Why read this plan? ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Aim what we want to achieve ........................................................................................... 10 2.2 Objectives.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Very Rough Guide to the Main DNA Sources of the Counties of The
    A Very Rough Guide To the Main DNA Sources of the Counties of the British Isles (NB This only includes the major contributors - others will have had more limited input) TIMELINE (AD) ? - 43 43 - c410 c410 - 878 c878 - 1066 1066 -> c1086 1169 1283 -> c1289 1290 (limited) (limited) Normans (limited) Region Pre 1974 County Ancient Britons Romans Angles / Saxon / Jutes Norwegians Danes conq Engl inv Irel conq Wales Isle of Man ENGLAND Cornwall Dumnonii Saxon Norman Devon Dumnonii Saxon Norman Dorset Durotriges Saxon Norman Somerset Durotriges (S), Belgae (N) Saxon Norman South West South Wiltshire Belgae (S&W), Atrebates (N&E) Saxon Norman Gloucestershire Dobunni Saxon Norman Middlesex Catuvellauni Saxon Danes Norman Berkshire Atrebates Saxon Norman Hampshire Belgae (S), Atrebates (N) Saxon Norman Surrey Regnenses Saxon Norman Sussex Regnenses Saxon Norman Kent Canti Jute then Saxon Norman South East South Oxfordshire Dobunni (W), Catuvellauni (E) Angle Norman Buckinghamshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Bedfordshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Hertfordshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Essex Trinovantes Saxon Danes Norman Suffolk Trinovantes (S & mid), Iceni (N) Angle Danes Norman Norfolk Iceni Angle Danes Norman East Anglia East Cambridgeshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Huntingdonshire Catuvellauni Angle Danes Norman Northamptonshire Catuvellauni (S), Coritani (N) Angle Danes Norman Warwickshire Coritani (E), Cornovii (W) Angle Norman Worcestershire Dobunni (S), Cornovii (N) Angle Norman Herefordshire Dobunni (S), Cornovii
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Migration: DNA Testing Companies Allow Us to Answer The
    We Scots Are All Immigrants – And Cousins to Boot! by John King Bellassai * [This article appears in abbreviated form in the current issue of Scots Heritage Magazine. It is reprinted here in its entirety with the permission of the editors of that publication.] America is a nation of immigrants. In fact, North America was uninhabited until incomers from Asia crossed a land bridge from Siberia to Alaska some 12,000 years ago—right after the last Ice Age—to eventually spread across the continent. In addition, recent evidence suggests that at about the same time, other incomers arrived in South America by boat from Polynesia and points in Southeast Asia, spreading up the west coast of the contingent. Which means the ancestors of everyone here in the Americas, everyone who has ever been here, came from somewhere else. Less well known is the fact that Britain, too, has been from the start a land of immigrants. In recent years geology, climatology, paleo-archaeology, and genetic population research have come together to demonstrate the hidden history of prehistoric Britain—something far different than what was traditionally believed and taught in schools. We now know that no peoples were indigenous to Britain. True, traces of humanoids there go back 800,000 years (the so-called Happisburg footprints), and modern humans (Cro-Magnon Man) did indeed inhabit Britain about 40,000 years ago. But we also now know that no one alive today in Britain descends from these people. Rather, during the last Ice Age, Britain, like the rest of Northern Europe, was uninhabited—and uninhabitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Annals of the Caledonians, Picts and Scots
    Columbia (HnitJer^ftp intlifCttpufUmigdrk LIBRARY COL.COLL. LIBRARY. N.YORK. Annals of t{ie CaleDoiuans. : ; I^col.coll; ^UMl^v iV.YORK OF THE CALEDONIANS, PICTS, AND SCOTS AND OF STRATHCLYDE, CUMBERLAND, GALLOWAY, AND MURRAY. BY JOSEPH RITSON, ESQ. VOLUME THE FIRST. Antiquam exquirite matrem. EDINBURGH PRINTED FOR W. AND D. LAING ; AND PAYNE AND FOSS, PALL-MALL, LONDON. 1828. : r.DiKBURnii FIlINTEn I5Y BAI.LANTTNK ASn COMPAKV, Piiiri.'S WOKK, CANONGATK. CONTENTS. VOL. I. PAGE. Advertisement, 1 Annals of the Caledonians. Introduction, 7 Annals, -. 25 Annals of the Picts. Introduction, 71 Annals, 135 Appendix. No. I. Names and succession of the Pictish kings, .... 254 No. II. Annals of the Cruthens or Irish Picts, 258 /» ('^ v^: n ,^ '"1 v> Another posthumous work of the late Mr Rlt- son is now presented to the world, which the edi- tor trusts will not be found less valuable than the publications preceding it. Lord Hailes professes to commence his interest- ing Annals with the accession of Malcolm III., '* be- cause the History of Scotland, previous to that pe- riod, is involved in obscurity and fable :" the praise of indefatigable industry and research cannot there- fore be justly denied to the compiler of the present volumes, who has extended the supposed limit of authentic history for many centuries, and whose labours, in fact, end where those of his predecessor hegi7i. The editor deems it a conscientious duty to give the authors materials in their original shape, " un- mixed with baser matter ;" which will account for, and, it is hoped, excuse, the trifling repetition and omissions that sometimes occur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mysterious World of Celtic Coins
    The Mysterious World of Celtic Coins Coins were developed about 650 BC on the western coast of modern Turkey. From there, they quickly spread to the east and the west, and toward the end of the 5th century BC coins reached the Celtic tribes living in central Europe. Initially these tribes did not have much use for the new medium of exchange. They lived self-sufficient and produced everything needed for living themselves. The few things not producible on their homesteads were bartered with itinerant traders. The employ of money, especially of small change, is related to urban culture, where most of the inhabitants earn their living through trade or services. Only people not cultivating their own crop, grapes or flax, but buying bread at the bakery, wine at the tavern and garments at the dressmaker do need money. Because by means of money, work can directly be converted into goods or services. The Celts in central Europe presumably began using money in the course of the 4th century BC, and sometime during the 3rd century BC they started to mint their own coins. In the beginning the Celtic coins were mere imitations of Greek, later also of Roman coins. Soon, however, the Celts started to redesign the original motifs. The initial images were stylized and ornamentalized to such an extent, that the original coins are often hardly recognizable. 1 von 16 www.sunflower.ch Kingdom of Macedon, Alexander III the Great (336-323 BC) in the Name of Philip II, Stater, c. 324 BC, Colophon Denomination: Stater Mint Authority: King Alexander III of Macedon Mint: Colophon Year of Issue: -324 Weight (g): 8.6 Diameter (mm): 19.0 Material: Gold Owner: Sunflower Foundation Through decades of warfare, King Philip II had turned Macedon into the leading power of the Greek world.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar 54 Bc
    CAESAR 54 BC INTRODUCTION Caesar 54BC, the fourth Campaign of Caesar in Gaul covers in fact the major invasion of the southern part of Britania (present-day England) by Julius Caesar. The Roman objective is to capture as many hostages as possible from the hostile local tribes. The Briton player must use all means at his disposal to prevent the suc- cess of the raid, to discourage further Roman invasions. Caesar 54BC lasts 14 turns, each of 2 weeks, between April and November 54 BC. The Romans, led by Caes- ar, are launching a campaign over the southern part of the island of Britania. • The Roman player must capture as fast as possible the stringholds of the opposing Briton tribes and take hostages from them, with the help of his famous general, his legions and his fleet. • His Briton opponent must prevent this, using his war chariots, coastal tribes and opportunities created by storms and bad weather hampering Roman supply. The game event cards allow full replay ability thanks to the numerous various situations that their create on the diplomatic, military, political or economical fields Average duration: 1h30 Favored side: none GAME DURATION Hardest side to play: none Caesar 54BC lasts 14 turns, each of 2 weeks, between April and November 54 BC. TheRoman player always moves first, followed by the Briton player. FORCES The Roman player controls the Roman (red), and possible (via Card) the Trinovantes (yellow) units. The Briton player controls the units of the various Briton tribes (Atrebates, Regnii, Catuvellaunii, Cantii, Begae, Incenii, Dobunii, all in variant of tan), as well as the Trinovantes (yellow) and the Menapii (light green).
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom of Strathclyde from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Kingdom of Strathclyde From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Strathclyde (lit. "Strath of the Clyde"), originally Brythonic Ystrad Clud, was one of the early medieval kingdoms of the Kingdom of Strathclyde Celtic people called the Britons in the Hen Ogledd, the Teyrnas Ystrad Clut Brythonic-speaking parts of what is now southern Scotland and northern England. The kingdom developed during the ← 5th century–11th → post-Roman period. It is also known as Alt Clut, the Brythonic century name for Dumbarton Rock, the medieval capital of the region. It may have had its origins with the Damnonii people of Ptolemy's Geographia. The language of Strathclyde, and that of the Britons in surrounding areas under non-native rulership, is known as Cumbric, a dialect or language closely related to Old Welsh. Place-name and archaeological evidence points to some settlement by Norse or Norse–Gaels in the Viking Age, although to a lesser degree than in neighbouring Galloway. A small number of Anglian place-names show some limited settlement by incomers from Northumbria prior to the Norse settlement. Due to the series of language changes in the area, it is not possible to say whether any Goidelic settlement took place before Gaelic was introduced in the High Middle Ages. After the sack of Dumbarton Rock by a Viking army from Dublin in 870, the name Strathclyde comes into use, perhaps reflecting a move of the centre of the kingdom to Govan. In the same period, it was also referred to as Cumbria, and its inhabitants as Cumbrians. During the High Middle Ages, the area was conquered by the Kingdom of Alba, becoming part of The core of Strathclyde is the strath of the River Clyde.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHUR of CAMELOT and ATHTHE-DOMAROS of CAMULODUNUM: a STRATIGRAPHY-BASED EQUATION PROVIDING a NEW CHRONOLOGY for 1St MIILLENNIUM ENGLAND
    1 Gunnar Heinsohn (15 June 2017) ARTHUR OF CAMELOT AND ATHTHE-DOMAROS OF CAMULODUNUM: A STRATIGRAPHY-BASED EQUATION PROVIDING A NEW CHRONOLOGY FOR 1st MIILLENNIUM ENGLAND “It seems probable that Camelot, Chrétien de Troyes’ [c. 1140-1190 AD] name for Arthur's Court, is derived directly from Camelod-unum, the name of Roman Colchester. The East Coast town was probably well-known to this French poet, though whether he knew of any specific associations with Arthur is unclear. […] John Morris [1973] suggests that Camulodunum might actually have been the High-King Arthur's Eastern Capital” (David Nash Ford 2000). "I think we can dispose of him [Arthur] quite briefly. He owes his place in our history books to a 'no smoke without fire' school of thought. [...] The fact of the matter is that there is no historical evidence about Arthur; we must reject him from our histories and, above all, from the titles of our books" (David N. Dumville 1977, 187 f.) I Why neither the habitats of Arthurian Celts nor the cities of their Saxon foes can be found in post-Roman Britain p. 2 II Contemporaneity of Saxons, Celts and Romans during the conquest of Britain in the Late Latène period of Aththe[Aθθe]-Domaros of Camulodunum/Colchester p. 14 III Summary p. 29 IV Bibliography p. 30 Author’s1 address p. 32 1 Thanks for editorial assistance go to Clark WHELTON (New York). 2 I Why neither the habitats of Arthurian Celts nor the cities of their Saxon foes can be found in post-Roman Britain “There is absolutely no justification for believing there to have been a historical figure of the fifth or sixth century named Arthur who is the basis for all later legends.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Dumnonia
    ancient Dumnonia. BT THE REV. W. GRESWELL. he question of the geographical limits of Ancient T Dumnonia lies at the bottom of many problems of Somerset archaeology, not the least being the question of the western boundaries of the County itself. Dcmnonia, Dumnonia and Dz^mnonia are variations of the original name, about which we learn much from Professor Rhys.^ Camden, in his Britannia (vol. i), adopts the form Danmonia apparently to suit a derivation of his own from “ Duns,” a hill, “ moina ” or “mwyn,” a mine, w’hich is surely fanciful, and, therefore, to be rejected. This much seems certain that Dumnonia is the original form of Duffneint, the modern Devonia. This is, of course, an extremely respectable pedigree for the Western County, which seems to be unique in perpetuating in its name, and, to a certain extent, in its history, an ancient Celtic king- dom. Such old kingdoms as “ Demetia,” in South Wales, and “Venedocia” (albeit recognisable in Gwynneth), high up the Severn Valley, about which we read in our earliest records, have gone, but “Dumnonia” lives on in beautiful Devon. It also lives on in West Somerset in history, if not in name, if we mistake not. Historically speaking, we may ask where was Dumnonia ? and who were the Dumnonii ? Professor Rhys reminds us (1). Celtic Britain, by G. Rhys, pp. 290-291. — 176 Papers, §*c. that there were two peoples so called, the one in the South West of the Island and the other in the North, ^ resembling one another in one very important particular, vizo, in living in districts adjoining the seas, and, therefore, in being maritime.
    [Show full text]
  • 'J.E. Lloyd and His Intellectual Legacy: the Roman Conquest and Its Consequences Reconsidered' : Emyr W. Williams
    J.E. Lloyd and his intellectual legacy: the Roman conquest and its consequences reconsidered,1 by E.W. Williams In an earlier article,2 the adequacy of J.E.Lloyd’s analysis of the territories ascribed to the pre-Roman tribes of Wales was considered. It was concluded that his concept of pre- Roman tribal boundaries contained major flaws. A significantly different map of those tribal territories was then presented. Lloyd’s analysis of the course and consequences of the Roman conquest of Wales was also revisited. He viewed Wales as having been conquered but remaining largely as a militarised zone throughout the Roman period. From the 1920s, Lloyd's analysis was taken up and elaborated by Welsh archaeology, then at an early stage of its development. It led to Nash-Williams’s concept of Wales as ‘a great defensive quadrilateral’ centred on the legionary fortresses at Chester and Caerleon. During recent decades whilst Nash-Williams’s perspective has been abandoned by Welsh archaeology, it has been absorbed in an elaborated form into the narrative of Welsh history. As a consequence, whilst Welsh history still sustains a version of Lloyd’s original thesis, the archaeological community is moving in the opposite direction. Present day archaeology regards the subjugation of Wales as having been completed by 78 A.D., with the conquest laying the foundations for a subsequent process of assimilation of the native population into Roman society. By the middle of the 2nd century A.D., that development provided the basis for a major demilitarisation of Wales. My aim in this article is to cast further light on the course of the Roman conquest of Wales and the subsequent process of assimilating the native population into Roman civil society.
    [Show full text]
  • Inauguration and Images of Kingship in England, France and the Empire C.1050-C.1250
    Christus Regnat: Inauguration and Images of Kingship in England, France and the Empire c.1050-c.1250 Johanna Mary Olivia Dale Submitted for examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of History November 2013 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Abstract This thesis challenges the traditional paradigm, which assumes that the period c.1050-c.1250 saw a move away from the ‘biblical’ or ‘liturgical’ kingship of the early Middle Ages towards ‘administrative’ or ‘law-centred’ interpretations of rulership. By taking an interdisciplinary and transnational approach, and by bringing together types of source material that have traditionally been studied in isolation, a continued flourishing of Christ-centred kingship in the twelfth and early thirteenth centuries is exposed. In demonstrating that Christological understandings of royal power were not incompatible with bureaucratic development, the shared liturgically inspired vocabulary deployed by monarchs in the three realms is made manifest. The practice of monarchical inauguration forms the focal point of the thesis, which is structured around three different types of source material: liturgical texts, narrative accounts and charters. Rather than attempting to trace the development of this ritual, an approach that has been taken many times before, this thesis is concerned with how royal inauguration was understood by contemporaries. Key insights include the importance of considering queens in the construction of images of royalty, the continued significance of unction despite papal attempts to lower the status of royal anointing, and the depth of symbolism inherent in the act of coronation, which enables a reinterpretation of this part of the inauguration rite.
    [Show full text]