NEU ERSCHIENENE LITERATUR 1975–2002/2003 3 Neu Erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEU ERSCHIENENE LITERATUR 1975–2002/2003 3 Neu Erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 3 A. NEU ERSCHIENENE LITERATUR 1975–2002/2003 3 Neu erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 3 Achilara 1997 Achilara L., Μυρίνα: οι μνημειακές εγκαταστάσεις του οικόπεδου Ευτ. Καζόλη, in: Doumas Ch. G., La Rosa V. (Hrsg.), Η Πολιόχνη και η Πρώιμη Εποχή του Χαλκού στο Βόρειο Αιγαίο – Poliochni e l’antica età del bronzo nell’Egeo Settentrionale, Athen 1997, 298–310. Agallopoulou – Agallopoulou D., Kalliontzis N., Τρία αρχαία λιμάνια στον όρμο Kalliontzis 1988 του Πουρνιά της Β. Λήμνου, AEphem 127, 1988, 167–174. Agallopoulou 1994 Agallopoulou D., Δύο νέες προϊστορικές θέσεις και ένα αρχαίο λιμάνι στη Λήμνο, AEphem 133, 1994, 301–311. Agouridis 1993 Agouridis Ch., Οι μυλόλιθοι από το πρωτοελλαδικό Φορτίο του Δοκού, Ενάλια 5 (1–2), 1993, 20–25. Agouridis 1997 Agouridis Ch., Sea routes and navigation in the third millenni- um Aegean, OxfJA 16, 1997, 1–24. Albanakis – Albanakis K., Syridis G., Παλαιογεωγραφία και φυσικό Syridis im Druck περιβάλλον των προϊστορικών και ιστορικών πληθυσμών της ευρύτερης περιοχής του Θερμαϊκού κόλπου, im Druck. Alcock 1991 Alcock S. E., Urban survey and the polis of Phlius, Hesperia 60, 1991, 421–463. Alcock et al. 1994 Alcock S. E. et al., The Pylos Regional Archaeological Project: 1992–1994, Archaeological News 19, 1994, 24–27. Alimov et al. 1998 Alimov K. et al., Prähistorischer Zinnbau in Mittelasien. Vor- bericht der ersten Kampagne 1997, Eurasia Antiqua 4, 1998, 137–199. Ålin 1991 Ålin P., The prehistoric periods, in: Kase E. W., Sezmler G. J., Wilkie N. C., Wallace P. W. (Hrsg.), The Great Isthmus Corri- dor Route, Explorations of the Phokis-Doris Expedition, vol. I, Dubuque, Iowa 1991 (Center for Ancient Studies, Uni- versity of Minnesota, Publication No. 3). Rezensionen: Corvi- sier J.-N., REG 106, 1993, 233–235. Salmon J., ClR 43, 1993, 370–371. Alisoy 2002 Alisoy H. A., Ground stone tools from Mesimeriani, in: Grammenos D. B., Kotsos S., Ανασκαφή στον προϊστορικό οικισμό «Μεσημεριανή Τούμπα» Τριλόφου, Ν. Θεσσαλονίκη (Ανασκαφικές περίοδοι 1992, 1994–1996, 2000, 2001), Thessaloniki 2002 (Δημοσιεύματα του Αρχαιολογικού Ινστιτούτου Βόρειας Ελλάδας αρ. 1) 277–314. Allen 1990 Allen H., A Postglacial record from the Kopais Basin, Greece, in: Bottema S., Entjes-Nieborg G., van Zeist W. (Hrsg.), Man’s role in the shaping of the Eastern Mediterranean landscape. Proceedings of the Ingua/Bai Symposium on the impact of ancient man on the landscape of the Eastern Mediterranean 4 Neu erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 Neu erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 5 region and the Near East. Groningen/Netherlands, 6–9 March 1989, Rotterdam – Brookfield 1990, 173–182. Alram-Stern 2000–2002 Alram-Stern E., Endneolithische und frühbronzezeitliche Ne- kropolen in der Ägäis. Beziehungen in Architektur und Grab- sitte, in: Archaeologia Austriaca. Beiträge zur Paläanthropolo- gie, Ur- und Frühgeschichte Österreichs 84–85, Festschrift für Egon Reuer zum fünfundsiebzigsten Geburtstag, Wien 2000– 2002, 125–136. Alram-Stern 2001a Alram-Stern E., Kontinuität und Diskontinuität im Chalkoli- thikum und der beginnenden Frühbronzezeit Südgriechen- lands (mit einem Beitrag von Peter Stadler), in: Roman P., Diamandi S. (Hrsg.), Cernavodă III – Boleráz: Ein vorge- schichtliches Phänomen zwischen dem Oberrhein und der un- teren Donau, Mangalia/Neptun (18.–24. Oktober 1999), Buka- rest 2001 (Studia Danubiana Series Symposia II) 89–108. Alram-Stern 2001b Alram-Stern E., Prähistorische Keramik aus den österreichi- schen Ausgrabungen auf der Akropolis in Aigeira, in: Mit- sopoulos-Leon V. (Hrsg.), Forschungen in der Peloponnes. Ak- ten des Symposiums anläßlich der Feier „100 Jahre Öster- reichisches Archäologisches Institut Athen“, Athen 5. 3.– 7. 3. 1998, Athen 2001 (Österreichisches Archäologisches Insti- tut, Sonderschriften Band 38) 63–71. Alram-Stern 2001c Alram-Stern E., Zur vormykenischen Besiedlung der Akropolis von Aigeira, in: Blakolmer F., Szemethy H. D. (Hrsg.), Akten des 8. Österreichischen Archäologentages am Institut für Klassische Archäologie der Universität Wien vom 23. bis 25. April 1999 in Wien, Wien 2001, 13–18. Alram-Stern 2003a Alram-Stern E., The acropolis of Aigeira before the Mycena- ean settlement, in: Bietak M. (Hrsg.), The synchronization of civilizations in the Eastern Mediterranean in the 2nd millenni- um BC, Schloß Haindorf, May 2–7, 2001, Wien 2003 (Contribu- tions to the chronology of the Eastern Mediterranean IV) 437–454. Alram-Stern 2003b Alram-Stern E., Aigeira/Achaia and the settlement pattern on the Peloponnese in the Chalcolithic and EH I, in: Η προϊστορική έρευνα στην Ελλάδα και οι προοπτικές της. Θεωρητικοί και μεθοδολογικοί προβληματισμοί. Αρχαιολογικό συμπόσιο στη μνήμη του Δ. Ρ. Θεοχάρη, Θεσσαλονίκη / Καστοριά 26, 27 και 28 Νοεμβρίου 1998, Thessaloniki 2003, 21–28. Alt-Ägina Walter H. (Hrsg.), Alt-Ägina, Mainz 1976. Amberger 1979 Amberger K. P., Neue Tierknochenfunde aus der Magula Pev- kakia in Thessalien II. Die Wiederkäuer, München 1979 (Dis- sertation). 4 Neu erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 Neu erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 5 Anagnostou et al. 1990 Anagnostou I., Kyriatzi E., Vargas A., Andreou S., Ανασκαφή Τούμπας Θεσσαλονίκης 1990. Οι εργασίες στην πλαγιά της Τούμπας, AErgoMak 4, 1990, 277–288. Andreev 1990 Andreev J. V., Turmhäuser auf den Kykladen? Zur Deutung der sogenannten Kornspeichermodelle auf der Insel Melos (Russ.), Krathie soobscenija Instituta Archeologii 203, 1990, 3–9. Andreopoulou-Mangou 1993 Andreopoulou-Mangou E., Χημική ανάλυση χάλκινων αντικειμένων από τη Σκοτεινή Θαρρουνίων, in: Sampson A., Σκοτεινή Θαρρουνίων. Το σπήλαιο, ο οικισμός και το νεκροταφείο, Athen 1993, 435–437. Andreou S. 1996–97 Andreou S., Σίνδος: Αποθέτης κεραμεικής της Πρώιμης Εποχής του Χαλκού, ADelt 51–52, 1996–97, A΄ Mel 51–84. Andreou S. – Fotiadis – Andreou S., Fotiadis M., Kotsakis K., The Neolithic and Kotsakis 1996 Bronze Age of Northern Greece, AJA 100, 1996, 537–597. Andreou S. – Fotiadis – Andreou S., Fotiadis M., Kotsakis K., The Neolithic and Kotsakis 2001 Bronze Age of Northern Greece . Reprint of AJA 100.3, 1996, 537–597; Addendum, in: Cullen T. (Hrsg.), Aegean Prehistory: A Review, Boston 2001 (AJA Supplement 1) 259–327. Andreou S. – Kotsakis – Andreou S., Kotsakis K., Chourmouziadis G., Ανασκαφή στην Chourmouziadis 1990 Τούμπα Θεσσαλονίκης 1989, Egnatia 2, 1990, 381–403. Andreou S. – Kotsakis – Andreou S., Kotsakis K., Chourmouziadis G., Ανασκαφή Chourmouziadis 1991–92 Τούμπας Θεσσαλονίκης 1990–1992, Egnatia 3, 1991–92, 175– 198. Andreou S. – Kotsakis 1987 Andreou S., Kotsakis K., Διαστάσεις του χώρου στην Κεντρική Μακεδονία. Αποτύπωση της ενδοκοινοτικής και διακοινοτικής χωροοργάνωσης, in: Άμητος. Τιμητικός τόμος γιά τον καθηγητή Μανόλη Ανδρόνικο 1, Thessaloniki 1987, 57–88. Andreou H. – Andreou H., Andreou G., Η Ίμβρος στην αρχαιότητα, Andreou G. 1991 Αρχαιολογία 41, 1991, 92–100. Andrikou 1998 Andrikou E., An Early Helladic figurine from Thebes, Boeotia, BSA 93, 1998, 103–106. Angelopoulou 2003 Angelopoulou A., Η «ομάδα Καστριού» και το Κορφάρι των Αμυγδαλιών (Πάνορμος) Νάξου, in: Vlachopoulos A., Birtacha K. (Hrsg.), ΑΡΓΟΝΑΥΤΗΣ: Τιμητικός τόμος για τον καθηγητή Χρίστο Ντούμα, Athen 2003, 153–184. Angelopoulou im Druck Angelopoulou A., Σφραγίδες και σφραγίσματα: ενδείξεις για εμπορικές δραστηριότητες στις Κυκλάδες κατά την 3η χιλιετία π.Χ., in: B’ Κυκλαδικό Συνέδριο, Θήρα 31 Aug. – 3 Sept. 1995, Athen im Druck. 6 Neu erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 Neu erschienene Literatur 1975–2002/2003 7 Anthony 1996 Anthony D. W., V. G. Childe’s world system and daggers of the Early Bronze Age, in: Wailes B. (Hrsg.), Craft specialization and social evolution: In memory of V. Gordon Childe, Philadelphia 1996 (University Museum Monograph 93) 47–66. Antonopoulos 1989 Antonopoulos Ph., Dokos 1989: Diving Organization, Ενάλια 1, 1989, 38–39. Antonova – Tolstikov – Antonova I., Tolstikov V., Treister M., The gold of Troy, Treister 1996 London 1996. Apostolopoulou- Apostolopoulou-Kakavogianni O., Τοπογραφία της περιοχής των Kakavogianni 1979 Φερών Θεσσαλίας κατά την προϊστορική περίοδο, ADelt 34, 1979, A’ Mel 174–206. Apostolopoulou- Apostolopoulou-Kakavogianni O., Η Πρώιμη Εποχή του Χαλκού Kakavogianni 2001 (3000–2000 π. Χ.), in: Μεσόγεια. Ιστορία και πολιτισμός των Μεσογείων Αττικής, Athen 2001, 35–42. Arapojanni – Rambach – Arapojanni X., Rambach J., Godart L., Kavkania. Die Ergeb- Godart 2002 nisse der Ausgrabung 1994 auf dem Hügel von Agrilitses, Mainz 2002. Aravantinos 1986 Aravantinos V. L., The EH II fortified building at Thebes: some notes on its architecture, in: Hägg R., Konsola D. (Hrsg.), Early Helladic architecture and urbanization. Proceedings of a seminar held at the Swedish Institute in Athens, June 8, 1985, Göteborg 1986 (SIMA 76) 57–63. Archontidou-Argyri 1994 Archontidou-Argyri A., Η Μύρινα υπό το φως των ανασκαφών, Αρχαιολογία 50, 1994, 50–55. Archontidou-Argyri 1997a Archontidou-Argyri A., Λήμνος – Πρώιμη Εποχή του Χαλκού. Έρευνα και προβληματισμός, in: Doumas Ch. G., La Rosa V. (Hrsg.), Η Πολιόχνη και η Πρώιμη Εποχή του Χαλκού στο Βόρειο Αιγαίο – Poliochni e l’antica età del bronzo nell’Egeo Settentri- onale, Athen 1997, 223–229. Archontidou-Argyri 1997b Archontidou-Argyri A., Η Πολιόχνη και τα νησιά του βορειοανατολικού Αιγαίου κατά την Εποχή του Χαλκού: Μερικές παρατηρήσεις, in: Mendoni L. G. (Hrsg.), Πολιόχνη Λήμνοι εν Αμιχθαλοέσσηι: Ένα κέντρο της Πρώιμης Εποχής του Χαλκού στο βόρειο Αιγαίο, Athen 1997, 20–22; 43–45; 66–68. Archontidou – Archontidou A., Acheilara L., Αρχαιολογικό Μουσείο Μυτιλήνης, Acheilara 1999 1999 (YPPO-K’ EPKA). Archontidou – Di
Recommended publications
  • Mathias Mehofer
    REINHARD JUNG · MATHIAS MEHOFER MYCENAEAN GREECE AND BRONZE AGE ITALY: COOPERATION, TRADE OR WAR? »I continue to believe it probable that the occasion for the first introduction of Type II swords to the Aegean was military necessity that drove Mycenaean princes to hire warriors from outside Greece. These warriors brought their own armouries with them. Their swords in particular were greatly admired by their em - ployers, who set their own swordsmiths to copy and adapt them.« 1 Since the publication of Hector Catling’s paper, which contains the above interpretation of Late Bronze Age relations between Mycenaean Greece and its north-western neighbours, various research ers have decisively contributed to a better understanding of the pro - cesses that lead 1) to the adoption of new types of weapons, armour, dress accessories and implements (often referred to as metallurgical koiné or »urnfield bronzes«) at the end of the Aegean Bronze Age and 2) to the local production of impasto pottery of Italian Recent and Final Bronze Age type in the Aegean and beyond. Thanks to the results of recent studies, we are provided with detailed typological arguments 2 that support the theory that the origin of those bronze and pottery types has to be traced back to Italy (figs 1-2). Other schools of research argued that the majority of the types forming the Fig. 1 Sites of the studied objects in Italy. – (Map R. Jung / metallurgical koiné was invented in the regions of M. Mehofer). Fig. 2 Sites of the studied objects in Greece. – (Map R. Jung / M. Mehofer). Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 43 · 2013 175 the Balkans and/or Central Europe and reached the Aegean via a Balkan route 3, whereas still others proposed to ascribe at least specific types to a Central European/Balkan origin 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Seyitömer Höyük Orta Tunç Çağı'na Ait Çizi Bezemeli Ağırşaklar
    Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2020 8(6) 2003–2013 Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University anemon Derginin ana sayfası: http://dergipark.gov.tr/anemon Araştırma Makalesi ● Research Article Seyitömer Höyük Orta Tunç Çağı’na Ait Çizi Bezemeli Ağırşaklar* Seyitömer Mound Medium Bronze Age Line Decoration Spindle Whorls Hülya Karaoğlan a,** a Öğr. Gör. Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Gediz Meslek Yüksek Okulu, Tasarım Bölümü, 43600, Kütahya/Türkiye. ORCİD: 0000-0003-1363-1779 MAKALE BİLGİSİ ÖZ Makale Geçmişi: Kütahya İlinin 30 km kuzeybatısında yer alan Seyitömer Höyük’te Kütahya Dumlupınar Başvuru tarihi: 01 Eylül 2019 Üniversitesi Arkeoloji bölümü tarafından aralıksız dokuz yıl süren kazı çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Düzeltme tarihi: 05 Haziran 2020 Seyitömer Höyük’te ele geçen buluntular arasında iplik üretiminde kullanılan ağırşaklar oldukça fazladır. Bu çalışmada Seyitömer Höyük ağırşak buluntularından M.Ö. 2. Bin’e ait olan çizi bezeme Kabul tarihi: 19 Haziran 2020 ile süslenmiş (işaretlenmiş) ağırşak grubu incelenmiştir. Bu grup kapsamındaki buluntular Orta Tunç Batı Anadolusun’daki yerleşimlerden Yanarlar, Anahtar Kelimeler: Çavlum, Beycesultan, Milet, Iasos, Şarhöyük, Kusura, Çeşme-Bağlararası, Liman Tepe, Kütahya Aphrodisias, Troya V. ve Demircihöyük yerleşimlerinin ağırşak buluntularıyla bezeme benzerlik Seyitömer Höyük yönleri araştırılmış ve kaynakçalarıyla verilmiştir. Çalışmada Seyitömer Höyük çizi bezemeli Ağırşak ağırşakların çizimleri, buluntu yerleri, ölçüleri ve tanımları katalog şeklinde verilmiştir. M.Ö. 2OOO, Çalışmanın amacı; arkeolojik araştırmalar için önemli olan bu buluntu grubunu literatüre katmaktır. Çizi Bezeme. A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Located in Seyitömer Mound, 30 km northwest of Kütahya Province, were carried out by the Received : 05 September 2019 Archeology Department of Kütahya Dumlupınar University.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Primal Greece : Between Dream and Archaeology
    The primal Greece : between dream and archaeology Introduction The Aegean civilisations in the French National Archaeological Museum « This unusual form […] reveals an unknown Greece within Greece […] as solemn, profound and colossal as the other is radiant, light and considered; […] all here meets the reputation of the Atrids and brings back the horror of the Achaean fables », wrote on 1830 in front of the walls of Mycenae, the traveller Edgard Quinet, who was passionate about Greek tragedies. Like other travellers before him, he was aware of approaching the memory of an unknown past, of a primal Greece, but he would never have believed that this Greece dated from prehistoric times. It will be the end of the 19th century before the pioneers of archaeology reveal to the world the first civilisations of the Aegean. The « Museum of National Antiquities» played then a key role, spreading the knowledge about these fabulous finds. Here, as well as in the Louvre, the public has been able to meet the Aegean civilisations. The Comparative Archaeology department had a big display case entirely dedicated to them. The exhibition invites visitors back to this era of endless possibilities in order to experience this great archaeological adventure. Birth of a state, birth of an archaeology As soon as it becomes independent (1832), Greece is concerned with preserving its antiquities and creates an Archaeological Service (1834). Shortly afterwards, Ephemeris Archaiologike, the first Greek archaeological review, is founded, at the same time as the Archaeological Society at Athens. The French School at Athens is founded in 1846 in order to promote the study of antiquities, and is followed by a German study Institute in 1874; many other countries will follow the example of France and Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East C. 2000-1500 B.C. Author(S): P. R. S. Moorey Source: World Archaeology, Vol
    The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C. Author(s): P. R. S. Moorey Source: World Archaeology, Vol. 18, No. 2, Weaponry and Warfare (Oct., 1986), pp. 196-215 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124615 Accessed: 06-11-2015 06:35 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to World Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 141.211.4.224 on Fri, 06 Nov 2015 06:35:53 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Tlhe emergence of the light, horse-drawn chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C.* The recent appearance of three richly documented monographs assembling the diverse and often complex evidence for riding and traction in the pre-classical societies of the Near East and Europe (Littauer and Crouwel 1979: Crouwel 1981: Piggott 1983) provides an opportunity for reassessing a number of critical issues in the earliest history of the light, horse-drawn chariot, whose arrival in many ancient communities has long been seen as a source of significant change in politics and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Handouts JM
    UCL - INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ARCL3034 THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF EARLY ANATOLIA 2007/2008 Year 3 Option for BA Archaeology 0.5 unit Co-ordinator: Professor Roger Matthews [email protected] Room 411. Tel: 020 7679 7481 UCL students at the Iron Age site of Kerkenes, June 2006 1 AIMS To provide an introduction to the archaeology of early Anatolia, from the Palaeolithic to the Iron Age. To consider major issues in the development of human society in Anatolia, including the origins and evolution of sedentism, agriculture, early complex societies, empires and states. To consider the nature and interpretation of archaeological sources in approaching the past of Anatolia. To familiarize students with the conduct and excitement of the practice of archaeology in Anatolia, through an intensive 2-week period of organized site and museum visits in Turkey. OBJECTIVES On successful completion of this course a student should: Have a broad overview of the archaeology of early Anatolia. Appreciate the significance of the archaeology of early Anatolia within the broad context of the development of human society. Appreciate the importance of critical approaches to archaeological sources within the context of Anatolia and Western Asia. Understand first-hand the thrill and challenge of practicing archaeology in the context of Turkey. COURSE INFORMATION This handbook contains the basic information about the content and administration of the course. Additional subject-specific reading lists and individual session handouts will be given out at appropriate points in the course. If students have queries about the objectives, structure, content, assessment or organisation of the course, they should consult the Course Co-ordinator.
    [Show full text]
  • Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula
    Journal of Field Archaeology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjfa20 Between Anatolia and the Aegean: Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula Çiler Çilingiroğlu , Malgorzata Kaczanowska , Janusz K. Kozłowski , Berkay Dinçer , Canan Çakırlar & Didem Turan To cite this article: Çiler Çilingiroğlu , Malgorzata Kaczanowska , Janusz K. Kozłowski , Berkay Dinçer , Canan Çakırlar & Didem Turan (2020): Between Anatolia and the Aegean: Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula, Journal of Field Archaeology To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1786929 Published online: 02 Aug 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yjfa20 JOURNAL OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1786929 Between Anatolia and the Aegean: Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula Çiler Çilingiroğlu a, Malgorzata Kaczanowskab, Janusz K. Kozłowskib, Berkay Dinçer c, Canan Çakırlar d, and Didem Turan a aEge University, Izmir, Turkey; bPolish Academy of Arts and Sciences, Krakow, Poland; cIstanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; dGroningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic periods of Turkey are poorly understood. The discovery of two sites Neolithization; prehistoric (Kocaman and Kayadibi) in the Karaburun Peninsula in coastal western Turkey opens a whole new Anatolia; lithics; Izmir; Turkey window into our understanding of these periods in Turkey and beyond by providing the first solid evidence for pre-Neolithic foragers. This article presents typological and technological properties of the lithics from these two open-air sites in terms of raw material selection, tool types, and technological preferences and discusses the results in relation to contemporary Anatolian, Aegean, southwest Asian, and southeast European industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of the Ancient World 4 - 5/2004 - 2005
    STUDIES OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 4 - 5/2004 - 2005 . Trnavská univerzita v Trnave Filozofická fakulta Universitas Tyrnaviensis Facultas Philosophica A N O D O S Studies of the Ancient World 4-5/2004-2005 T R N A V A 2006 A N O D O S Studies of the Ancient World 4-5/2004-2005 Redakčná rada/Editors: Prof. PhDr. Mária Novotná, DrSc. Prof. Dr. Werner Jobst doc. PhDr. Marie Dufková, CSc. doc. PhDr. Klára Kuzmová, CSc. Mgr. Pavol Hnila Kontaktná adresa (príspevky, ďalšie informácie)/Contact address (contributions, further information): Katedra klasickej archeológie, Trnavská univerzita v Trnave, Hornopotočná 23, SK-918 43 Trnava +421-33-5939371; fax: +421-33-5939370 [email protected] Publikované s finančnou podporou mesta Trnava a Vedeckej grantovej agentúry MŠ SR a SAV (Projekt VEGA č. 1/1219/04). Published with financial support of the town of Trnava and of the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA (Project No. 1/1219/04). Copyright: Trnavská univerzita v Trnave, Filozofická fakulta Redakcia/Editorial Staff: doc. PhDr. Klára Kuzmová, CSc., Zuzana Turzová Za znenie a obsah príspevkov zodpovedajú autori. The authors are responsible for their contributions. Tlač/Printed by: Michel Angelo Nitra ISBN 80-8082-109-7 Obálka/Cover: Motív „Zázračného dažďa“ zo stĺpa Marka Aurélia v Ríme. V okienku: Reliéf z chrámu Atény, Pergamon. Motif of the „Miracle rain“ from the column of Marcus Aurelius in Rome. In the window: Relief from the Athena-Temple, Pergamon Grafické spracovanie/Graphic elaboration: Mgr. Pavol Šima-Juríček Počítačové spracovanie/Computer elaboration:
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon-14 Chronology of Anatolia in Early Bronze Age
    CARBON-14 CHRONOLOGY OF ANATOLIA IN EARLY BRONZE AGE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY HAKKI ÜNCÜ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE PROGRAMME OF SETTLEMENT ARCHAEOLOGY DECEMBER 2010 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Meliha Altunışık Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Prof. Dr. Numan Tuna Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Assist. Prof. Jan-K. Bertram Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Evangelia Ionnidou-Pişkin (METU, SA) Assist. Prof. Dr. Jan-K. Bertram (METU, SA) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Burcu Erciyas (METU, SA) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Hakkı Üncü Signature: - iii - ABSTRACT CARBON-14 CHRONOLOGY OF ANATOLIA IN EARLY BRONZE AGE Üncü, Hakkı M. Sc., Department of Settlement Archaeology Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Jan-K. Bertram DECEMBER 2010, 422 PAGES This study is a conclusion of radiocarbon datings which are depend on evaluations of archaeologists or scholars who publishes these datings. So it is very attached to observations of those scholars especially for determining sub-phases of samples which are dated.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistory of Anatolia
    This page intentionally left blank The Prehistory of Asia Minor In this book, Bleda S. During¨ offers an archaeological analysis of Asia Minor, the area equated with much of modern-day Turkey, from 20,000 to 2000 BC. During this period, human societies moved from small-scale hunter-gatherer groups to complex and hierarchical communities with economies based on agriculture and industry. Dr. During¨ traces the spread of the Neolithic way of life, which ultimately reached across Eurasia, and the emergence of key human developments, including the domestication of animals, metallurgy, fortified towns, and long-distance trading networks. Situated at the junction between Europe and Asia, Asia Minor has often been perceived as a bridge for the movement of technologies and ideas. By contrast, this book argues that cultural developments followed a distinctive trajectory in Asia Minor from as early as 9000 BC. Bleda S. During¨ is a postdoctoral research Fellow and lecturer at Leiden University. He has done extensive fieldwork in Turkey and currently directs the Cide Archae- ological Project, surveying the western Turkish Black Sea region. The author of numerous articles in edited volumes and journals, such as Anatolian Studies, Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology,andArchaeological Dialogues,Dr.During¨ is also the author of Constructing Communities: Clustered Neighbourhood Settlements of the Central Anatolian Neolithic. The Prehistory of Asia Minor From Complex Hunter-Gatherers to Early Urban Societies Bleda S. During ¨ Leiden University cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, ny 10013-2473, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521149815 C Bleda S.
    [Show full text]
  • West Anatolian Mining in Early Bronze Age (3000-2000 Bc)
    ARCHAEOLOGY WEST ANATOLIAN MINING IN EARLY BRONZE AGE (3000-2000 BC) Abstract:The discovery of people’s mines and the use of them has been a major breakthrough in the development of civilization. In Anatolia, which has rich ore deposits, it is seen that people recognized the mines from the Neolithic Age. When the Early Bronze Age came, mining activities became very widespread. In western Anatolia, centers such as Troia, Limantepe and Beycesultan have become masters of metal production. In this article, in the Harun Oy Early Bronze Age, the mining of the western Anatolian region is evaluated. Ordu University In this context, mineral deposits of the Western Anatolian region, mineral [email protected] products and their usage areas, archaeological sites that found metal were investigated. In addition, the use of metals such as copper, tin, bronze, lead, gold, silver and iron in the region has been discussed. Keywords: West Anatolia, Early Bronze Age, Mining, Troia, Beycesultan. DOI: 10.14795/j.v4i2.219 ISSN 2360 – 266X ISSN–L 2360 – 266X 1.INTRODUCTION natolia is an important region in terms of mineral resources and prehistoric mining. Determination of mineral deposits in Konya- AÇatalhöyük and Aksaray-Aşıklı Mound in Anatolia from the Neolithic Age (9000 BC) shows that mines have been explored and used in Anatolia since the earliest times. This early period mining will show great improvement over time. Following the Chalcolithic Age (5000-3000 BC), the discovery of bronze, a mixture of copper and tin, gave a name to the age of the Bronze Age (Bronze Age), due to the fact that mining and mining techniques reached a very advanced stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Tholos Tomb at Kambos, Avia: Excavation by Christos Tsountas, 1891
    Honouring the Dead in the Peloponnese Proceedings of the conference held at Sparta 23-25 April 2009 Edited by Helen Cavanagh, William Cavanagh and James Roy CSPS Online Publication 2 prepared by Sam Farnham Table of Contents Abstracts v Preface xxv 1 Emilia Banou and Louise Hitchcock The 'Lord of Vapheio': the social identity of the dead and its implications for Laconia in the 1 Late Helladic II–IIIA period. 2 Diana Burton God and hero: the iconography and cult of Apollo at the Amyklaion. 25 3 Nikolaos Dimakis The display of individual status in the burials οf Classical and Hellenistic Argos. 33 4 Eleni Drakaki Late Bronze Age female burials with hard stone seals from the Peloponnese: a contextual 51 approach. 5 Rachel Fox Vessels and the body in Early Mycenaean funerary contexts. 71 6 Florentia Fragkopoulou Sanctuary dedications and the treatment of the dead in Laconia (800–600 BC): the case of 83 Artemis Orthia. 7 Stamatis Fritzilas Grave stelai and burials in Megalopolis. 99 8 Pepi Gavala The sculpted monuments in Laconian cemeteries (late 19th – early 20th century). 129 9 Oliver Gengler 151 Leonidas and the heroes of Thermopylae: memory of the dead and identity in Roman Sparta. 10 Mercourios Georgiadis 163 Honouring the dead in Mesolithic and Neolithic Peloponnese: a few general observations. 11 Grigoris Grigorakakis 183 New investigations by the 39th Ephoreia of Prehistoric and Classical antiquities at Helleniko, n. Kynouria. The burial of Late Classical date from the western roadside cemetery. 12 Georgia Kakourou-Chroni Nikiforos Vrettakos: “Let us depart ascending ...” 201 13 Konstantinos Kalogeropoulos The social and religious significance of palatial jars as grave offerings.
    [Show full text]