Museum Representations of the Classical Past in Post-War Greece: a Critical Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Museum Representations of the Classical Past in Post-War Greece: a Critical Analysis MARLEN MOULIOU Museum representations of the classical past in post-war Greece: a critical analysis ‘WHHATAT DDOESOES “AASKSK” TTHEHE SSOURCESOURCES mean?’.1 This is and contextual in perspective, will help us collect relevant a core question that must preoccupy all historians and evidence and clues which will hopefully lead to a better interpreters of the past, who read the past according to understanding of the various interconnecting systems that the questions they subject their sources to and the kind contribute to the representation of the classical past in the of conceptual theories they use. The choice of theory and Greek museum. methodology undoubtedly defines the structure, breadth and content of a research project and consequently the production of knowledge. Historians are, in a way, like Studying museum representations of the classical past: the fishermen;2 the kind of fish they catch depends on the discourses, systems and changes from 1948 to the kind of net they cast in the water. present day This paper’s ‘fish’ is museum constructions of the clas- sical past in post-war Greece,3 which will be critically With the outbreak of World War II, the Greek Archaeo- investigated using a complex set of ‘nets’. These are the logical Service9 was placed in the unfortunate situation of Foucauldian concepts of ‘discourse’4 and ‘representation’,5 having to dismantle all the archaeological museum exhi- change management6 and organizational theories as well as bitions around the country and rebury the antiquities in theories deriving from the field of developmental psychol- the ground in order to secure their safety and survival dur- ogy and human ecology.7 ing wartime operations. However, ‘destroying’ the work The aim is to shed light on the process of production that past generations of Greek archaeologists had created, through which Greek museum exhibitions construct, or- meant that archaeologists in Greece after the war were der, represent and interpret the classical past. It is also to faced with the great challenge of producing new museum explore the essential factors and forces, whether driving or displays and embarking on a fundamental reorganisation restraining, that have been shaping this process of produc- of museums in the country. This long and historically tion since the late forties. The intention is to unmask the chequered post-war period, which can only be reviewed poetics and politics of museum representations of the clas- in summary fashion, may be conventionally divided into sical past and view both within the historical, cultural and three large chronological chunks, themselves defined by political contexts of a long-standing intellectual tradition. important landmarks of an institutional and/or historical Thus, these museum representations will be investigated nature: a) 1948-1976, the regenerationperiod: this is the both in their historical development and in comparison time of intensive reorganization and gradual maturation of with contemporaneous examples. The former route, chron- Greek archaeological museums, when theclassicalpastas ological in nature, will allow us to better assess the changes 8 linearevolutionofart prevails as the dominant interpreta- that occur from 1948 onwards; the latter, more discursive tive museum paradigm; b) 1977-1996, the period of un- 3rd SU PPL EMEN T, AT HENS 20 08 83 A SINGULAR ANTIQUITY MARLEN MOULIOU sustainable archaeological museum expansion: throughout settling questions about what, and whom, the subject is this phase the interpretative paradigm of theclassicalpast for’ and try to ‘make the best of, a plurality of answers’. 12 asempiricalandobjectiveanalysisofarchaeologicalfinds Naturally, the range and number of archaeological ex- was developed and consolidated, alongside the previous hibitions available for this study is vast. It is impossible model which had in the interim been broadened to cover to present all the different examples within the space of other forms of art apart from sculpture and pottery. A a single article, thus we shall focus on a few eloquent and parallel demand for a more educational museum and thus illustrative ones. one more useful to society, which could and should narrate interesting stories about the past gradually emerged. This ‘Museum-School’ conceptual model was steadily embed- The regeneration period (1948-1976). The classical past ded and diversified, by means of educational programmes as linear evolution of art targeting school groups and other interested audiences. It failed, however, to replace the two earlier leading interpre- The end of World War II and later of the civil war in tative paradigms in the production of permanent museum Greece signaled a new era for Greek museums. In 1948, displays; it was, nonetheless, tested for the purposes of at the dawn of the post-war reformation, when the na- temporary museum exhibitions, presented in Greece and tion was still embroiled in a devastating civil war, the abroad, though it only had a marginal influence on the reopening of three galleries in the National Archaeologi- making of permanent exhibitions; and c) 1997 to present cal Museum was cheerfully greeted by the print media day, the period of great opportunities (legal, financial, of the time. Newspaper commentaries and literary texts scientific, technological) and of pressing challenges (in- by leading intellectuals assigned to this reopening a sym- stitutional, ideological, social and epistemological). This bolic meaning.13 George Seferis experienced the return changing landscape offers fertile ground for the propaga- of the statues to the museum galleries as a ‘chorus of the tion of eclectic museological and museographical options, resurrected, a second coming of bodies that gave you a consciously or unconsciously followed. However, the need crazy joy’.14 Marinos Kalligas identified the museum re- for a mindful, humane, socially open, conceptual museum opening with the need for national resurrection and the model that can also offer a more theoretically rounded cul- urgent need for a strengthening of the nation’s collective tural interpretation of the classical past is more necessary conscience and unity: than ever. Some twenty years ago, Anthony Snodgrass and Chris ‘The reopening of the National Archaeological Museum Chippindale, commenting on the subject of classical ar- is a cultural event of global significance. Undoubtedly our chaeology, remarked that ‘our choosing to venerate the National Museum is the most important museum of its classical as classical says something about ourselves but kind worldwide. [...]. These objects belong to the era that not of itself or about classical society’.10 Today, classical gave birth to a new mythology, which we could call Euro- archaeology is going through profound changes, and mu- pean mythology, that is precisely the symbolic representa- seum constructions of the classical past, as one of the most tion of the values that have guided us, at least up to now. powerful and telling disciplinary systems, can potentially This is exactly why the reopening of the Museum acquires reflect and express these changes. a further significance, for it provides the opportunity to This process of changing our views and tools for looking weigh up [the symbolic representation of the classical and at the classical past is still very much in progress, encom- European] values, and to judge whether it is worth fighting passing not one but many archaeologies of Greece with a for their survival or instead for their replacement by other plurality of agendas, theoretical positions and interpreta- values which represent a new state of affairs. We welcome tions.11 Many maintain that we cannot assume there is, the opening of the Museum as an auspicious turning point or indeed should be, a single manifesto or rhetoric for the for the revival of cultural values in our land’.15 ways classical archaeology should work or indeed that the classical past should be represented in the museum. In- In subsequent years, an ‘unfreezing’ process started for stead, what classical archaeologists must do is to ask ‘un- Greek museums and an array of forces, events, personali- 84 ΜΟUSEIO BENAKI ARCHAEOLOGY AND HELLENIC IDENTITY IN TWENTIENTH-CENTURY GREECE Museum representations of the classical past in post-war Greece: a critical analysis ties, norms and ideas shaped the ‘systems’ through which Last but not least among the forces that affected ar- their interpretative approaches toward the representation of chaeological practice at the time was the gradual trans- the classical past were determined. formation of Greece into a popular tourist destination, The outcome of the Civil War was one of the core ele- which had an immense impact on the quality and extent ments in preserving Hellenist archaeology.16 Greece’s new of the country’s development. A ‘tourist archaeology’ foreign relations were made explicit, firstly with an open gradually gathered momentum, as sites, antiquities and British intervention during the civil war and, secondly, museums were attributed, by state and public alike, with with the commencement of the Truman Doctrine in 1947 an added value of a monetary nature – mundane, perhaps, which allowed the continuous involvement of the USA in though expedient nonetheless.20 Greek archaeology and the political, economic and administrative life of Greece. its monumental material culture were called upon to sat- During this period, the country started a long process of isfy the demands of the state for economic development
Recommended publications
  • Mathias Mehofer
    REINHARD JUNG · MATHIAS MEHOFER MYCENAEAN GREECE AND BRONZE AGE ITALY: COOPERATION, TRADE OR WAR? »I continue to believe it probable that the occasion for the first introduction of Type II swords to the Aegean was military necessity that drove Mycenaean princes to hire warriors from outside Greece. These warriors brought their own armouries with them. Their swords in particular were greatly admired by their em - ployers, who set their own swordsmiths to copy and adapt them.« 1 Since the publication of Hector Catling’s paper, which contains the above interpretation of Late Bronze Age relations between Mycenaean Greece and its north-western neighbours, various research ers have decisively contributed to a better understanding of the pro - cesses that lead 1) to the adoption of new types of weapons, armour, dress accessories and implements (often referred to as metallurgical koiné or »urnfield bronzes«) at the end of the Aegean Bronze Age and 2) to the local production of impasto pottery of Italian Recent and Final Bronze Age type in the Aegean and beyond. Thanks to the results of recent studies, we are provided with detailed typological arguments 2 that support the theory that the origin of those bronze and pottery types has to be traced back to Italy (figs 1-2). Other schools of research argued that the majority of the types forming the Fig. 1 Sites of the studied objects in Italy. – (Map R. Jung / metallurgical koiné was invented in the regions of M. Mehofer). Fig. 2 Sites of the studied objects in Greece. – (Map R. Jung / M. Mehofer). Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt 43 · 2013 175 the Balkans and/or Central Europe and reached the Aegean via a Balkan route 3, whereas still others proposed to ascribe at least specific types to a Central European/Balkan origin 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Primal Greece : Between Dream and Archaeology
    The primal Greece : between dream and archaeology Introduction The Aegean civilisations in the French National Archaeological Museum « This unusual form […] reveals an unknown Greece within Greece […] as solemn, profound and colossal as the other is radiant, light and considered; […] all here meets the reputation of the Atrids and brings back the horror of the Achaean fables », wrote on 1830 in front of the walls of Mycenae, the traveller Edgard Quinet, who was passionate about Greek tragedies. Like other travellers before him, he was aware of approaching the memory of an unknown past, of a primal Greece, but he would never have believed that this Greece dated from prehistoric times. It will be the end of the 19th century before the pioneers of archaeology reveal to the world the first civilisations of the Aegean. The « Museum of National Antiquities» played then a key role, spreading the knowledge about these fabulous finds. Here, as well as in the Louvre, the public has been able to meet the Aegean civilisations. The Comparative Archaeology department had a big display case entirely dedicated to them. The exhibition invites visitors back to this era of endless possibilities in order to experience this great archaeological adventure. Birth of a state, birth of an archaeology As soon as it becomes independent (1832), Greece is concerned with preserving its antiquities and creates an Archaeological Service (1834). Shortly afterwards, Ephemeris Archaiologike, the first Greek archaeological review, is founded, at the same time as the Archaeological Society at Athens. The French School at Athens is founded in 1846 in order to promote the study of antiquities, and is followed by a German study Institute in 1874; many other countries will follow the example of France and Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Zur Sprache Nikos Kazantzakis' Auf Grund Des Romans
    * iiiìi., -Ji*:' - i ;:: u* i--i i.l ,å iì.ì :.',.1 i.-l I î r Ëriâili;ung c*' akaiem' tìracles Magister / Magistra Phil. l.sLD rr--.r -S¡RÇ!{ N\.,?oU LÜL' Approbieri am; ;¿l'b;? >tre u er/inz '\N z ,,ZtJt Sprache Nikos Kazantzakis' auf Grund des Romans <O Kapetan Michalis>. Ein Beitrag zur neugriechischen Lexikographie." Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades MagisterderM f,'4't''"¡^*""i eingereicht an der ge isteswissenschaft lichen F akultät der Universität Wien r-" "Ç, ft ;l ,i,Í t./ r.; ,l .i¡ .' von Antonios Koliadis Wien, anZ3,Februar 2000 Danksagungen An dieser Stelle möchte ich mich aufrichtig bei meiner Betreuerin Frau Univ.-Ass. Dr. M. Stassinopoulou für ihre Untersttitzung, sowie bei Herrn.Univ.-Prof. J. Koder fi¡r das Interesse, das er gezeigl hat und für seine wertvollen Kommentare, bedanken. Weiters ist Georgios Matsaridis (Rhethymnon) zu danken, der eines Nachts zu mir in Birmingham mit der Idee eines kazantzakischen Lexikons kam. Das zugrundeliegende Konzept dieser Diplomarbeit entstand in jener Nacht. Tief verpflichtet bin ich auch Herrn Ass-Prof. Dr. A. Mohay (Budapest) und Herrn Univ.- Prof. D. Tziovas (Birmingham), die von Anfang an das Thema der votliegenden Diplomarbeit beg¡tißt und mich in meinen Untersuchungen motiviert haben. Wertvolle Hinweise verdanke ich außerdem Herrn Univ.-Prof. E. Trapp (Bonn) und Herm Univ.-Prof. Chr. Tzitzilis (Thessaloniki) bezüglich der Gestaltung des lexikographischen Anhanges und Herrn A. Mamalis für semantische Ratsciläge bezüglich der Bedeutungen vieler Wörter des Anhanges, sowie Frau B. Lienhard und Herrn Dr, M. Hinterberger für das Durchlesen einiger Stellen des Manuskripts.
    [Show full text]
  • EAA2021 Sessions 14 July-1.Pdf
    ORGANISERS 27th EAA Annual Meeting (Kiel Virtual, 2021) - Sessions Names, titles and affiliations are reproduced as submitted by the session organisers and/or authors. Language and wording were not revised. Technical editing: Kateřina Kleinová (EAA) Design and layout: Kateřina Kleinová (EAA) Design cover page: Janine Cordts (Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte Universität Kiel) European Association of Archaeologists Prague, June 2021 © European Association of Archaeologists, 2021 Tuesday 7 September 2021 #EAA2021 5 UNDERSTANDING PREHISTORIC DEMOGRAPHY Time: 9:00 - 16:30 CEST, 7 September 2021 Theme: 5. Assembling archaeological theory and the archaeological sciences Format: Regular session Organisers: Armit, Ian (University of York) - Damm, Charlotte (University of Tromso) - Črešnar, Matija (University of Ljubljana) ABSTRACTS 9:00 INTRODUCTION 9:15 THE COLOGNE PROTOCOL: ESTIMATING PAST POPULATION DENSITIES Schmidt, Isabell (University of Cologne) - Hilpert, Johanna (Kiel University - CAU) - Kretschmer, Inga (Landesamt für Denkmalpflege Stuttgart) - Peters, Robin (Landschaftsverband Rheinland) - Broich, Manue - Schiesberg, Sara - Vo- gels, Oliver - Wendt, Karl Peter - Zimmermann, Andreas - Maier, Andreas (University of Cologne) 9:30 DWELLINGS, SETTLEMENT ORGANISATION AND POPULATION FLUCTUATIONS: A MULTI-SCALAR CASE STUDY FROM ARCTIC NORWAY Damm, Charlotte (Arctic University of Norway) 9:45 EXPLORING LOCAL GEOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS UNDERPINNING REGIONAL DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE AMONG HUNTER-FISHER-GATHERERS IN SOUTHWEST COASTAL NORWAY (11,500-4300 CAL BP) Lundström, Victor - Bergsvik, Knut (University Museum, University of Bergen) 10:00 TERRITORIES, STRATEGIES AND TWO GENERATIONS Odgaard, Ulla (Independent researcher) 10:15 POPULATION DYNAMICS AND THE EXPANSION OF AGRICULTURE. ASSESSING THE RADIOCARBON GAPS DURING THE NEOLITHIZATION PROCESS IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN Cortell-Nicolau, Alfredo (Departament de Prehistòria, Arqueologia i Història Antiga. Universitat de València) - Crema, Enrico (Department of Archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Tholos Tomb at Kambos, Avia: Excavation by Christos Tsountas, 1891
    Honouring the Dead in the Peloponnese Proceedings of the conference held at Sparta 23-25 April 2009 Edited by Helen Cavanagh, William Cavanagh and James Roy CSPS Online Publication 2 prepared by Sam Farnham Table of Contents Abstracts v Preface xxv 1 Emilia Banou and Louise Hitchcock The 'Lord of Vapheio': the social identity of the dead and its implications for Laconia in the 1 Late Helladic II–IIIA period. 2 Diana Burton God and hero: the iconography and cult of Apollo at the Amyklaion. 25 3 Nikolaos Dimakis The display of individual status in the burials οf Classical and Hellenistic Argos. 33 4 Eleni Drakaki Late Bronze Age female burials with hard stone seals from the Peloponnese: a contextual 51 approach. 5 Rachel Fox Vessels and the body in Early Mycenaean funerary contexts. 71 6 Florentia Fragkopoulou Sanctuary dedications and the treatment of the dead in Laconia (800–600 BC): the case of 83 Artemis Orthia. 7 Stamatis Fritzilas Grave stelai and burials in Megalopolis. 99 8 Pepi Gavala The sculpted monuments in Laconian cemeteries (late 19th – early 20th century). 129 9 Oliver Gengler 151 Leonidas and the heroes of Thermopylae: memory of the dead and identity in Roman Sparta. 10 Mercourios Georgiadis 163 Honouring the dead in Mesolithic and Neolithic Peloponnese: a few general observations. 11 Grigoris Grigorakakis 183 New investigations by the 39th Ephoreia of Prehistoric and Classical antiquities at Helleniko, n. Kynouria. The burial of Late Classical date from the western roadside cemetery. 12 Georgia Kakourou-Chroni Nikiforos Vrettakos: “Let us depart ascending ...” 201 13 Konstantinos Kalogeropoulos The social and religious significance of palatial jars as grave offerings.
    [Show full text]
  • Artisans in the Service of the Royalty at Dendra and Their Role in the Formation of Fashion Trends
    Artisans in the Service of the Royalty at Dendra and their Role in the Formation of Fashion Trends Eleni Konstantinidi-Syvridi1 Abstract: Through its remarkable finds the necropolis at Dendra, covering the periods LH IIB–IIIB, offers an eloquent picture of the luxury possessed by the aristocracy up to the final phase of the early Mycenaean period. It is a time when art and crafts shift away from the hitherto Minoan influences to create forms and symbols that are purely Mycenaean, in search of a new identity. Metalwork of an advanced workmanship, testifying to the presence of highly skilled craftsmen, furnished the distinguished deceased in the necropolis. Craftsmen in the service of the elite seem to have circulated between various areas of the Aegean and Cyprus, forming through their creations common codes between its members. Being one of the few unplundered tholoi of the period, the Dendra tomb gathers most of those features that became fashionable in art and crafts among the early Mycenaean elite. A re-evaluation of the grave goods can therefore provide the impetus for a discussion on the production, manufacture and trade of luxurious items, especially metalwork, at the threshold of the Mycenaean Palatial period. Keywords: Dendra, warrior burials, metalwork, metal vessels, tholos tombs Within the fragile socio-political landscape of the early Mycenaean period, the elite families fought for the establishment of their political and economic power over the region,2 and at the same time shared a network of common values and symbols of
    [Show full text]
  • Eleutherios Venizelos and the Balkan Wars*
    ELEUTHERIOS VENIZELOS AND THE BALKAN WARS* I did not have the good foituneto know Eleutherios Venizelos personally. I was only once privileged to see him, about 1930, when I heard him speak in the Town Hall at Rethymnon, my native town. I cannot tell you what he said. I was barely ten years old at the time, and politics were beyond my grasp. But I still remember the very real contact, spontaneous and unforced, between the speaker and his listeners, and fhe distinctive atmosphere which prevailed, an atmosphere which would have allowed the speaker to go even counter to the wishes of his audience. The charm which the words, even the mere presence, of Eleutherios Ve­ nizelos exerted on those around him is A fact so well known as to be beyond dispute. You may say that in attempting to add my own humble testimony I am simply stating the obvious. You must forgive me. I value this personal re­ collection; it is my sole visual and direct link with the national leader of mo­ dern Greece. I read later that even Venizelos’s opponents recognised and feared his compelling charm, about which George Streit remarked : “When the two of us are alone and we disagree, Venizelos never convinces me! If there are three of us, I begin to waver. The moment he addresses several people, at Cabinet meetings for instance, it often happens that I am carried away too, along with the others!”*1 George Streit’s assertion that Venizelos needed the presence of A third person to convince his interlocutor is not correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Art, 1958-1964 Bieber, Margarete Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1965; 6, 2; Proquest Pg
    New Trends in the New Books on Ancient Art, 1958-1964 Bieber, Margarete Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1965; 6, 2; ProQuest pg. 75 New Trends in the New Books on Ancient Art, 1958-1964 Margarete Bieber TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD Page I PRE-GREEK ART 76 1. Oriental Art 76 2. Crete and Mycenae 77 II GREECE 78 1. Archaic Period 78 2. Vase Painting 79 3. Handbooks 82 4. Architecture 88 III REPRINTS 89 IV ETRURIA 93 V ROMAN ART 96 1. Comprehensive Books 96 2. Roman Provinces 100 3. Architecture 107 4. Sculpture 115 5. Painting and Mosaic 116 VI CATALOGUES OF MUSEUMS AND EXHIBITIONS 120 CONCLUSION 141 Foreword HERE HAS BEEN AN ENORMOUS OUTPUT of books on ancient art Tsince I reported on publications appearing between 1952-1957.1 Librarians, classicists, historians, and art lovers have asked me from time to time which of this flood of books they ought to buy for their libraries or their private reading. I thought it desirable, therefore, 1 CW 52 (1958) 72-75. 75 76 NEW TRENDS IN THE NEW BOOKS ON ANCIENT ART, 1958-1964 to compile a kind of critical bibliography of the best books which have appeared in the last six years. In the following survey, I have included those which I consider most important among works available to me, and I have mentioned a few of which I have at least seen a favourable review. I have arranged these books according to subject, giving pre­ ference to good surveys of larger fields. I have excluded encyclopedias, articles in periodicals, and reports on excavations.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Boeotian Potters
    EARLY BOEOTIAN POTTERS (PLATES 44-52) Amico et magistro bene mnerentid. d. > J THEN JosephClark Hoppin published his Handbookof GreekBlack-Figured Vases in 1924 he included in his section on Boeotia (pp. 17-24) nine vases with the signatures of five potters: Gamedes, Gryton, (I)phithadas, Menaidas, Mnasalkes. Since that time six additional vases signed by the same potters and five by a new one, Polon, have become known from museums and private collections. It seems worthwhile, therefore, to re-edit the material with photographs and to re- examine some of the problems raised by a study of this rather homogeneous group of vases.1 A. E. RAUBITSCHEK STANFORD UNIVERSITY 1 Our study began with the Heidelberg alabastron (Menaidas 5) which was put at our disposal by Roland Hampe; from him and from his associates, Hildegard Gropengiesser and Erika Diehl, we received generous help throughout the work. In the study of the Bonn aryballos (Menaidas 4) we enjoyed the assistance of Christiane Grunwald. For the photographs of the vases in the Louvre (Gamedes 1, Menaidas 1, Polon 1-4), in the British Museum (Gamedes 2), and in Athens (Mnasalkes 1) we are grateful to P. Devambez, Ann Birchall, Barbara Philippaki, Dina Delmouzou, Semni Karouzou. Karl Schefold and Reinhard Lullies called our attention to the Solothurn aryballos (Mnasalkes 3) and to the Berlin aryballos (Gryton 1) respectively, and we received photographs of the former from its owner Rudolf Schmidt and of the latter from Elisabeth Rohde and Huberta von Littrow. Finally, Cornelius Vermeule put the valuable material from Boston (Gryton 2, Mnasalkes 2, Polon 5) at our disposal, and Fritz Eichler and Rudolf Noll gave us information and photos of the Vienna aryballos (Phithadas 2), Ulrich Gehrig and Norbert Kunisch of the Berlin exaleiptron, Klaus Vierneisel of the unsigned Mnasalkes aryballos in Munich, and Neda Leiper of the unsigned snake in Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestor [email protected]
    Volume 45 Issue 1 January 2018 Nestor Bibliography of Aegean Prehistory and Related Areas Department of Classics, University of Cincinnati Editor: Carol Hershenson P.O. Box 0226, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221-0226, U.S.A. Assistant Editor: Eirini Paizi http://classics.uc.edu/nestor [email protected] COMMUNICATIONS Grants and Fellowships On 31 January 2018 applications for grants (not normally exceeding £2,000) to assist with the publication of archaeological fieldwork in the Mediterranean world, with possible priority to Bronze Age sites, are due to the Mediterranean Archaeological Trust. Further information is available at https://sites.google.com/site/medarchtrust/grants. Calls for Papers On 15 January 2018 abstracts (200 words) are due for the 18th International Conference for Ancient East-Mediterranean Studies in Tartu (ICAEM 2018): “Power and (Op)position”, to be held at the Research Center of Ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean Cultures, Institute of History and Archaeology, University of Tartu in Tartu, Estonia on 1-3 June 2018. Further information, including currently accepted conference sessions, is available at http://caemc.ut.ee/icaem2018. On 15 January 2018 abstracts (250 words) are due for sessions at the Theoretical Archaeology Group (TAG-US) 2018: Matter Matters, to be held at the University of Florida, Gainesville on 11-13 May 2018; on 16 March 2018 abstracts (250 words) are due for papers, whether to a session or as an open paper. Further information, including currently accepted conference sessions, is available at https://tag2018uf.clas.ufl.edu/. On 31 January 2018 abstracts (in English, maximum 250 words) are due for the Sympozjum Egejskie.
    [Show full text]