Religious Authorities in Wahhabi States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Religious Authorities in Wahhabi States ISSUE BRIEF 05.06.19 Religious Authorities in Wahhabi States Courtney Freer, Ph.D., London School of Economics Wahhabism is a central element of region of Saudi Arabia and forged a close debates on Islam and religious extremism, relationship with the Saudi political leadership, especially in educational institutions in the the al-Saud family. This relationship Arabian Peninsula. The structures linked to underlies the institutionalization of religious Wahhabism, one of the most conservative authorities in the form of Wahhabi scholars strands of Islam, are perhaps the most who are state employees in Saudi Arabia. opaque in the Middle East, leading to Although Qatar is also officially a Wahhabi considerable misconceptions about this state, the religious sphere is not similarly religious ideology and the figures linked to it. bureaucratized, with no institutionalized form In Saudi Arabia, the practice of Wahhabism of state religious authority in the form of a is also undergoing significant changes grand mufti or bureaucratized state ulama under the leadership of Saudi Crown Prince (religious scholars). In fact, most religious Mohammad bin Salman. While traditionally authorities in the country are not Qatari, and the strictures of Wahhabism have influenced so an indigenous and state-linked ulama has everyday life in the kingdom and have even not emerged as it has in Saudi Arabia. been enforced by a religious police force, Our regionwide survey mapping the this arrangement appears to be changing, religious landscape in the Middle East with restrictions on gender segregation offers key insights on the influence of and entertainment recently having been Wahhabism—a previous report discussed the partially lifted and with the institutionalized results in detail for Saudi Arabia and Qatar clergy and police increasingly separate from (https://bit.ly/2U61ptU). The survey was part the mechanisms of central political power. of a larger Baker Institute study on religious While traditionally the In Qatar, the role of religion in public life authority in the Middle East (https://bit. strictures of Wahhabism has generally remained static during this ly/2WfoqXT). In examining the survey results have influenced period, with the political leadership largely from Qatar and Saudi Arabia, I find that in everyday life in the separate from religious authorities. This brief both countries religious figures linked to the evaluates whether the Wahhabi countries state, such as figures of the bureaucratized kingdom and have of Saudi Arabia and Qatar are qualitatively ulama in Saudi Arabia and figures linked to even been enforced different in terms of which religious the Ministry of Awqaf in Qatar, are more by a religious police authorities are followed, how religious affairs likely to be trusted. The three most trusted force, this arrangement are managed by the state, and what the scholars in Saudi Arabia, among a nearly appears to be changing. implications of such differences are. equal number of nationals and non-nationals, Wahhabism is linked to Salafism in its were all Saudis from the Council of Supreme emphasis on returning to the original sources Scholars (Shaykh Saad bin Nasser al-Shethri, of Islam and the Hanbali school of Islamic Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdulaziz bin Abdullah jurisprudence.1 Unlike Salafism, however, al-Sheikh, and Sheikh Saleh Al-Sheikh), Wahhabism has its origins in the work of which is appointed by the king and is the only eighteenth-century theologian Muhammad body permitted to grant religious rulings in ibn Abd al-Wahhab who preached in the Najd that state. RICE UNIVERSITY’S BAKER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY // ISSUE BRIEF // 05.06.19 Meanwhile in a Qatari sample that fatwa, or official religious ruling, from the was overwhelmingly expatriate, Wahhabi Supreme Council against demonstrations.4 Shaykh Anwar al-Badawi, who is a Qatari Further, state-linked authorities who Islamic judge and head of Qatari Islamic were once considered widely influential Judges, was ranked most trusted, followed across borders no longer wield the by another Qatari Wahhabi scholar, Shaykh influence they once did, which is most State-linked authorities Abdullah bin Zayd al-Mahmud, who clearly evidenced by the overwhelmingly who were once had a major role in putting together the negative endorsement effect we saw for considered widely country’s judicial system and is based at the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar. As a result, the government-funded Islamic Cultural engagement with local ministries of awqaf influential across Center in Doha. Interestingly, Tariq Ramadan, is perhaps the most important means of borders no longer wield the Europe-based scholar and grandson ensuring that messaging about religion is the influence they once of Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim diffused in a manner that resonates with did, which is most Brotherhood, ranked third in terms of local populations of both expatriates and trusted religious authority in Qatar. There citizens. The role of ministries is critical clearly evidenced by is more variety, then, in which religious given the finding that state-linked religious the overwhelmingly authorities are followed in Qatar, reflecting authorities remain important in influencing negative endorsement the fact that the state is less directly religious belief and practice. effect we saw for involved in religious life compared to Saudi Second, economic incentives are not Arabia. While both states house considerable likely to effect social and political change the Grand Imam of expatriate populations (87 percent in Qatar in the wealthy countries of the Arabian Al-Azhar. and 27 percent in Saudi Arabia),2 citizens Peninsula. Because governments of these and non-nationals have similar opinions states benefit from hydrocarbon wealth, about which religious authorities they trust, they are able to provide handsomely for at least in the Saudi case where we had a their citizenry, granting them free education nearly even number of each group and health care, as well as high-paying of respondents. public sector jobs. As a result, groups like the Muslim Brotherhood that provide materially for their followers do not have POLICY IMPLICATIONS an advantage over other types of groups My findings about the power of state- as they do in places like Egypt and Jordan, where governments provide less for their Engagement with linked religious authorities lead to four core recommendations for policymakers. First, citizens. Indeed, among Saudi nationals, 12.9 local ministries of when it comes to influencing messaging percent reported that they had received awqaf is perhaps on citizen and non-citizen populations in assistance from the government, compared the Gulf, it is important to engage with to 4.5 percent from the Muslim Brotherhood, the most important 2.9 percent from Salafis, and 1.8 percent means of ensuring state religious authorities since they hold considerable sway in the religious sector from Sufis. Results were similar for non- that messaging about and in society more broadly. It is also nationals, even though they have less religion is diffused in a essential to understand their limitations, access to state resources: 8.2 percent had manner that resonates since their authority, though significant, is received assistance from the government, compared to 5.4 percent from the Muslim with local populations not absolute. Indeed, it is for that reason that independent Islamist movements Brotherhood, 4 percent from Salafis, and 1.5 of both expatriates have managed to emerge even within percent from Sufi groups. In Qatar, only 8 and citizens. Saudi Arabia, as evidenced most clearly percent had sought aid from a government by the rise of the Sahwa movement in religious agency, followed by 5.7 percent the 1990s and more recently in 2011 from the Muslim Brotherhood, and 3 percent when independent clerics linked to that from Salafis, again demonstrating that the movement, including Shaykh Salman government is the primary dispenser of al-Odah, collectively sent a petition to the aid to both nationals and expatriates. As Saudi leadership requesting reform.3 This expected, there is overall little need or at move, among others, led to the release of a least little use made of religious groups for material support. For religious organizations 2 RELIGIOUS AUTHORITIES IN WAHHABI STATES to hold influence, they must hold ideological Wahhabism across different countries will appeal or provide a social function since likely be unsuccessful, even in nations they cannot attract followers with material that appear similar at first glance like Qatar disbursements greater than those provided and Saudi Arabia. Neither state allows by the rentier governments of the Gulf. opportunities for meaningful political Third, expatriates follow and are reform, yet Saudi Arabia institutionalizes influenced by local religious authorities to the religious sphere and more stringently a larger extent than we may realize, which enforces the strictures of Wahhabism. By needs to be taken into account in messaging contrast, Qatar has a largely foreign class to these countries. The most trusted of ulama and does not enforce the social religious authorities in both countries were tenets of Wahhabism. Thus, political and state-affiliated, reflecting either their appeal social context matter despite similarities in or the ubiquity of state-sanctioned religious religious practice or doctrine. messaging. It is also quite interesting how the influence of state-affiliated Wahhabi religious leaders
Recommended publications
  • Politics, Terrorism, and the Sunni Divide
    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Fax & Email and Posted at www.fpri.org September 2009 POLITICS, TERRORISM, AND THE SUNNI DIVIDE By Samuel Helfont This E-Note is based on Mr. Helfont’s forthcoming monograph, The Sunni Divide: Understanding Politics and Terrorism in the Arab Middle East, a product of FPRI’s Center on Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Homeland Security. Wahhabism and the Muslim Brotherhood are two distinct forms of Sunni Islamism. They have separate histories and separate worldviews. In reality they are not even the same type of movement. Their origins were largely unrelated. Their historic missions have been completely different, as are their current goals and means of achieving those goals. Unfortunately, these differences too often are overshadowed by a false Sunni-Shia dichotomy that tends to lump all Sunni Islamists together. But learning the differences between Sunni Islamists is critical to understanding politics and terrorism in the Arab Middle East. One could even argue that the most important division shaping Arab politics is not between Sunnis and Shias but between the Wahhabis and the Brotherhood. Before delving into current issues, however, it is first necessary to define differences between Wahhabism and the Muslim Brotherhood. Wahhabism stems from the theological teachings of Muhammad ibn abd al-Wahhab, the eighteenth century reformer. Abd al- Wahhab was one of several “revivalist” thinkers to emerge from that century. The mission of these revivalists was to purify and thereby revitalize Islam. They carried the banner of reform but unlike modern reformers, they wanted to transform Islam on traditionally Islamic grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Islam and Counterterrorism in Southeast Asia: the Stanley an Agenda for US Policy Foundation Ince Late 2001, After the Interven- Asia
    Policy Bulletin Political Islam and Counterterrorism In Southeast Asia: The Stanley An Agenda for US Policy Foundation ince late 2001, after the interven- Asia. On the one hand, it has returned tion in Afghanistan, the United the region to the US “policy screen.” On SStates has focused attention on the other, it views Southeast Asia in a “second fronts” in the war on terrorism, single dimension—that of Islamic 44th Strategy assuming that Al Qaeda would disperse extremism—which can result in unbal- for Peace its operatives and resources more widely. anced, even myopic, policies. Conference Southeast Asia, a region of prime impor- tance during the Cold War, holds both Despite these contradictions, counterter- threat and promise. Indonesia, the largest rorism cooperation between the United October 16-18, 2003 country in the region, is home to more States and Southeast Asia has met with Muslims than all Arab states combined. some success. Greater awareness of Airlie Center, Warrenton, VA Southeast Asian Islam has traditionally extremist networks in the region has been moderate, but in the past decade resulted in tighter law enforcement and radical Islamists—indigenous and the arrest of some key terrorists. At the foreign—have made strides both same time, however, the United States is underground and in the public arena. at risk of encouraging greater radicalism in Southeast Asian Islamist communities Washington counts several Southeast with policies that often do not accurately Asian governments as military or politi- reflect local conditions and concerns. cal allies, but allegiance to the United States is far from automatic. After the To address the difficulties of formulating fall of Saigon in 1975, American foreign new policies in the post-September 11 policy centered on other regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis
    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 4 Spring 2005 Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq Hannibal Travis Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Recommended Citation Hannibal Travis, Freedom or Theocracy?: Constitutionalism in Afghanistan and Iraq, 3 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 1 (2005). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol3/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2005 Northwestern University School of Law Volume 3 (Spring 2005) Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights FREEDOM OR THEOCRACY?: CONSTITUTIONALISM IN AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ By Hannibal Travis* “Afghans are victims of the games superpowers once played: their war was once our war, and collectively we bear responsibility.”1 “In the approved version of the [Afghan] constitution, Article 3 was amended to read, ‘In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.’ … This very significant clause basically gives the official and nonofficial religious leaders in Afghanistan sway over every action that they might deem contrary to their beliefs, which by extension and within the Afghan cultural context, could be regarded as
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf July 2016
    Gulf July 2016 Boycott is over? Participative trends in Gulf’s Muslim Brotherhood In the Arab Gulf region, contemporary although different trends in government-opposition dialectic have been surfacing. Broadly looking at state-society relations, Kuwait, Jordan and Bahrain are representative case-studies to identify and compare paths of political moderation or exclusion in an age of regional instability. All these countries will held parliamentary elections by two years. In Kuwait, candidates belonging to the Islamic Constitutional Movement (ICM, also known as al-Harakat al-Dusturia al-Islamiya, HADAS) will run for the 2017 parliamentary elections. The Muslim Brotherhood- linked movement (even though no more formally affiliated with the international Brotherhood organization) boycotted last elections in 2012 and 2013 to criticize the electoral law, as many Salafi groups did as well. In Jordan, the Muslim Brotherhood has been experiencing a “crisis of political identity” still unsolved and it often opted in the past for the electoral boycott, as occurred in 2010 and 2013. Notwithstanding rising intra-Ikhwan fragmentation, all the parties who claim for the Muslim Brotherhood’s legacy (the Islamic Action Front proceeding from the original movement funded in 1942, the Society registered in 2015 and the reformist initiative Zamzam) will take part to the legislative elections scheduled the 20th of September, although limited change is expected from the consultation. In Bahrain, the main Shia political society, al-Wefaq, was dissolved on July 2016 by an administrative judicial act, under the accusation of “violating the law” (with regard to the new amendments to the Political Societies Law, banning the mix of politics and religion) and “favouring terrorism”.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Oppressed in the Name of Culture and Religion Saudi Arabia and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
    MALMÖ UNIVERSITY HR 61‐90 GLOBAL AND POLITICAL STUDIES AUTUMN 2010 HUMAN RIGHTS SUPERVISOR: ANNA BRUCE Women oppressed in the name of culture and religion Saudi Arabia and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women Elin Andersson & Linn Togelius Abstract In Saudi Arabia women are legal minors who need permission from a male guardian in, among others, matters concerning education, employment and health care. Despite the obvious subordination of women in the country, Saudi Arabia has ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, with a reservation saying that in cases of contradiction between the Convention and Islamic law they do not obligate themselves to follow the rules of the Convention. Respecting the culture, tradition and religion of non-western societies is important in the work with implementing international human rights. However, in the case of Saudi Arabia, it seems like the cultural and religious claims merely function as justification of an institutional oppression of women. This institutional practice of oppression is unique and taken to the extreme, but oppression of women in itself is a global phenomenon, which is not connected to a specific culture. Key words: Saudi Arabia, CEDAW, women’s rights, Feminism, Cultural Relativism, Islamic law 1 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Aim and research questions .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim Brotherhood Fol- Lowing the “25 Janu- Ary Revolution”
    Maria Dolores Algora Weber CEU San Pablo University THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD FOL- LOWING THE “25 JANU- ARY REVOLUTION”: FROM THE IDEALS OF THE PAST TO THE POLITICAL CHAL- LENGES OF THE PRESENT In the framework of the Arab Spring, as the wave of social mobilisation of 2011 has come to be known, the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt marked the beginning of a process which has deeply transformed the re- ality of many countries in the Arab World. In Egypt, the events that took place in Tahrir Square not only put an end to President Mubarak's dic- tatorship, but also paved the way for new political actors, among which the Muslim Brotherhood has played a key role. During the subsequent transition, the Brotherhood gained control of the National Assembly and positioned their leader, Mohamed Mursi, as the new President. The present debate is focused on the true democratic vocation of this move- ment and its relationship with the other social forces inside Egypt and beyond. This article intends to address these issues. To that end, it begins with an explanation as to the ideological and political evolution of the Muslim Brotherhood and its internal changes brought about by the end of the previous regime, closing with an analysis of its transnational influ- ence and the possible international aftermaths. Islam, Islamism, Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt, Arab Spring 181 INTRODUCTION n 2011, a wave of social mobilisations took place in various Arab countries and which came to be known as the “Arab Spring”. This name is undoubtedly an at- tempt to draw a comparison between the historic process that unfolded in Europe Iin the mid-nineteenth century and the events that have taken place in the Arab World.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria Year of Origin
    MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN SYRIA Name: The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria Year of Origin: 1945 Founder(s): Mustafa al-Sibai Place(s) of Operation: Syria Key Leaders: • Mohammad Hekmat Walid: Comptroller general [Image: Al Jazeera] • Hussam Ghadban: Deputy Comptroller general [Image not available] • Mohammad Hatem al-Tabshi: Head of Shura Council [Image not available] • Omar Mushaweh: Head of media and communications [Image; source: Fox News via Omar Mushaweh] • Mulham Droubi: Spokesman [Image; source: Syria Mubasher] • Zuhair Salem: Spokesman [Image; source: Twitter] • Mohammad Riad al-Shaqfeh: Former comptroller general [Image: AFP/Getty Images] • Mohammad Farouk Tayfour: Former deputy comptroller general [Image: please take from MB entity report] • Ali Sadreddine al-Bayanouni: Former comptroller general [Image: please take from MB entity report] • Issam al-Attar: Former comptroller general [Image: Bernd Arnold] Associated Organization(s): • Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin1 • Syrian Ikhwan2 The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood (i.e., the Syrian Brotherhood or the Brotherhood) was formed in 1945 as an affiliate of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.3 The Syrian Brotherhood actively participated in Syrian politics until 1963, when the incoming pan-Arab Baath party began restricting the movement before ultimately banning the party in 1964.4 In 1964, Brotherhood member Marwan Hadid formed a violent offshoot—known as the Fighting Vanguard—whose members waged numerous terror attacks against the regime in the 1970s and early ’80s. In 1982, in order to quell a Brotherhood uprising in the city of Hama, then-Syrian President Hafez al- Assad dealt a near-fatal blow to the group, killing between 10,000 and 40,000 armed 1 Raphaël Lefèvre, Ashes of Hama: The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 24.
    [Show full text]
  • I Am a Salafi : a Study of the Actual and Imagined Identities of Salafis
    The Hashemite Kingdom Jordan The Deposit Number at The National Library (2014/5/2464) 251.541 Mohammad Abu Rumman I Am A Salafi A Study of The Actual And Imagined Identities of Salafis / by Mohammad Abu Rumman Amman:Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2014 Deposit No.:2014/5/2464 Descriptors://Islamic Groups//Islamic Movement Published in 2014 by Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Jordan & Iraq FES Jordan & Iraq P.O. Box 941876 Amman 11194 Jordan Email: [email protected] Website: www.fes-jordan.org Not for sale © FES Jordan & Iraq All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the publishers. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are solely those of the original author. They do not necessarily represent those of the Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung or the editor. Translation: Dr. Hassan Barari Editing: Amy Henderson Cover: YADONIA Group Printing: Economic Printing Press ISBN: 978-9957-484-41-5 2nd Edition 2017 2 I AM A SALAFI A Study of the Actual and Imagined Identities of Salafis by Mohammad Abu Rumman 3 4 Dedication To my parents Hoping that this modest endeavor will be a reward for your efforts and dedication 5 Table of Contents DEDICATION ........................................................................................................ 5 FOREWORD .......................................................................................................... 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Character of Political Islam in Pakistan
    Journal of Research in Social Sciences ISSN 2305-6533 (P), 2306-112X (E) Vol. 9, No. 1, Jan 2021 Changing Character of Political Islam in Pakistan Qamar Abbas Cheema1 and Syed Qandil Abbas2 Abstract Pakistan's confessional parties are re-inventing themselves. The Parties that are carrying a legacy from the time before partition are struggling to keep themselves relevant in mainstream political discourse. Pakistan's political landscape is changing because of the rise of Tehreek-i-Insaf, a progressive center-right political party that has altered the electioneering environment in Pakistan. Two main confessional parties Jamaat Islami (JI) and Jamiat Ulma e Islam Fazal Ur Rehman (JUI-F) are trying to develop an inclusive and pluralist political agenda. JI is a hierarchical Islamic party whereas JUI-F is a network Islamic party. Political Islam is in the process of shrinking in Pakistan because of the rise of political alternatives and outdatedness of the political and electoral discourse of confessional parties. Political Islam in Pakistan is changing by improving its ideological, political, and organizational structure in relation to its contemporary rivals. Changes in political Islam are not because of intellectual diversity and growth within confessional parties but to manage and compete for the rise of competing domestic political perspectives. Transnational connections with like-minded Islamist groups have scaled-down as the like-minded religio-ideological partners are termed as extremists and terrorists. Keywords: Political Islam, confessional parties, Islamist perspective, identity, social contract Introduction The second half of the twentieth century has been important because activist groups across the Muslim world came up with competing Islamist perspectives that directly collided with existing political narratives erected and sustained by colonial powers.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamism Within a Civil War: the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood's Struggle For
    RETHINKING POLITICAL ISLAM SERIES August 2015 Islamism within a civil war: The Syrian Muslim Brotherhood’s struggle for survival WORKING PAPER Raphaël Lefèvre, Carnegie Middle East Center SUMMARY: After 30 years in exile outside of Syria, the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood has become an important component of the western-backed Syrian opposition. Despite its influence, the expansion and radicalization of the Islamist scene in Syria challenges the legitimacy of the Brotherhood’s gradualist approach and constrains its presence on the ground. About this Series: The Rethinking Political Islam series is an innovative effort to understand how the developments following the Arab uprisings have shaped—and in some cases altered—the strategies, agendas, and self-conceptions of Islamist movements throughout the Muslim world. The project engages scholars of political Islam through in-depth research and dialogue to provide a systematic, cross-country comparison of the trajectory of political Islam in 12 key countries: Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Syria, Jordan, Libya, Pakistan, as well as Malaysia and Indonesia. This is accomplished through three stages: A working paper for each country, produced by an author who has conducted on-the-ground research and engaged with the relevant Islamist actors. A reaction essay in which authors reflect on and respond to the other country cases. A final draft incorporating the insights gleaned from the months of dialogue and discussion. The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam and Politics in Tunisia
    Islam and Politics in Tunisia How did the Islamist party Ennahda respond to the rise of Salafism in post-Arab Spring Tunisia and what are possible ex- planatory factors of this reaction? April 2014 Islam and Politics in a Changing Middle East Stéphane Lacroix Rebecca Koch Paris School of© International Affairs M.A. International Security Student ID: 100057683 [email protected] Words: 4,470 © The copyright of this paper remains the property of its author. No part of the content may be repreoduced, published, distributed, copied or stored for public use without written permission of the author. All authorisation requests should be sent to [email protected] Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 2. Definitions and Theoretical Framework ............................................................... 4 3. Analysis: Ennahda and the Tunisian Salafi movements ...................................... 7 3.1 Ennahda ........................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Salafism in Tunisia ....................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Reactions of Ennahda to Salafism ................................................................................ 8 4. Discussion ................................................................................................................ 11 5. Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    VOLUME VII, ISSUE 36 u NOVEMBER 25, 2009 IN THIS ISSUE: BRIEFS...................................................................................................................................1 IBRAHIM AL-RUBAISH: NEW RELIGIOUS IDEOLOGUE OF AL-QAEDA IN SAUDI ARABIA CALLS FOR REVIVAL OF ASSASSINATION TACTIC By Murad Batal al-Shishani..................................................................................................3 AL-QAEDA IN IRAQ OPERATIONS SUGGEST RISING CONFIDENCE AHEAD OF U.S. MILITARY WITHDRAWAL Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) By Ramzy Mardini..........................................................................................................4 FRENCH OPERATION IN AFGHANISTAN AIMS TO OPEN NEW COALITION SUPPLY ROUTE Terrorism Monitor is a publication By Andrew McGregor............................................................................................................6 of The Jamestown Foundation. The Terrorism Monitor is TALIBAN EXPAND INSURGENCY TO NORTHERN AFGHANISTAN designed to be read by policy- makers and other specialists By Wahidullah Mohammad.................................................................................................9 yet be accessible to the general public. The opinions expressed within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily LEADING PAKISTANI ISLAMIST ORGANIZING POPULAR MOVEMENT reflect those of The Jamestown AGAINST SOUTH WAZIRISTAN OPERATIONS Foundation. As the Pakistani Army pushes deeper into South Waziristan, a vocal political Unauthorized reproduction or challenge
    [Show full text]