JCC Catalan Secession Movement 2017: Catalonia Vs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Claiming Independence in 140 Characters. Uses of Metaphor in the Construction of Scottish and Catalan Political Discourses on Twitter
CLAIMING INDEPENDENCE IN 140 CHARACTERS. USES OF METAPHOR IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF SCOTTISH AND CATALAN POLITICAL DISCOURSES ON TWITTER Carlota Maria Moragas Fernández ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art. 32 del Texto Refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual (RDL 1/1996). Para otros usos se requiere la autorización previa y expresa de la persona autora. -
Presentación De Powerpoint
THE TRUTH ABOUT CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE Last update: 28 November 2019 This document is subject to the evolution of the events it contains and will be periodically updated. Please note the date of the last update and, if necessary, request the latest version from: [email protected] This edition has only been updated to include the sentences of the trial that were published on 14 October. The verb tenses of the previous version have been maintained, without prejudice to the fact that a last update can be made by adjusting the concordances. Contents CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE 1. Timeline of the Independence bid THE CATALAN INDEPENDENCE BID ON TRIAL 2. The acts of 2017 and their prosecution 3. The five Articles of Spain’s Criminal Code that landed the procès defendants in the dock 4. Safeguards for the accused during the trial 5. Independence and safeguards of the Spanish legal system 6. Private prosecution: What is it? 7. The trial and sentences THE TRUTH ABOUT SPAIN AND ITS CATALAN REGION 8. The secessionists’ falsehoods 9. Spain is a state made up of Autonomous Communities 10. The price Catalonia is paying for the independence bid 11. Spain in international rankings QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS APPENDIX CATALONIA’S BID FOR INDEPENDENCE 1. Timeline of the Independence bid 11 SEPT Massive demonstration day (or Diada) for independence 2012 “Consultative process” • Promoted by the Catalan Regional 9 NOV Government [known as the Govern], presided by Artur Mas. 2014 Suspended by Spain’s Constitutional Court. • According to the Catalan regional administration [known as the Generalitat] 2,305,290 citizens voted and 80.76% of them voted in favour of independence. -
Folleto Supremo English.Indd
SUPREME COURT OF SPAIN SUPREME COURT 1 Queen´s Courtyard at the Supreme Court. SUPREME Cover2 picture,COURT the Waiting Hall (Salón de Pasos Perdidos). SUPREME COURT 3 Welcome to the Supreme Court ith jurisdiction throughout Spain, the Supreme Court is the uppermost tier Wof our judicial structure and the highest judicial body in all areas except for matters pertaining to constitutional safeguards. Without forgetting more distant historical precedents such as the Royal and Su- preme Council of Castile, established by the Catholic Monarchs, we can say with pride that our Supreme Court came to life as an aspiration of freedom and moder- nity in the Cádiz Constitution of 1812 (“There shall be a Court of Justice at the court which shall be called the Supreme Court of Justice”,Article 259). At a particularly diffi cult time for Spain, with Napoleon’s troops all over the country, the 1812 Constitution marked the reaffi rmation of national sovereignty and a renewed atmosphere of liberalism that was to spread throughout the outda- ted institutional structure of the time, with the Supreme Court playing a decisive role in its regeneration. Over the last 200 years the Supreme Court has risen up as a bastion in defence of freedom and is now the utmost guarantee for the defence of the rule of law from a jurisdictional perspective. Unlike many of the countries around us where there are ordinary and administrative jurisdictions, the Spanish Supreme Court is a single body as there is only one jurisdiction. In addition to the President and Vice-Presi- dent it is made up of the presidents of the fi ve Chambers and seventy-four judges, divided into fi ve chambers: the First, for Civil matters; the Second, for Criminal SUPREME 4 COURT matters; the Third, for Contentious Administrative matters; the Fourth, for Labour matters; and the Fifth, for Military matters. -
Catalan Independence 2018
Catalan Independence 2018 On October 1, 2017, the Catalan Government headed by Carles Puigdemont of the Junts per Catalunya parliamentary alliance held a referendum on the future independence of Catalonia. A semi-autonomous region within Spain, Catalonia enjoyed comparatively larger self-governance than many of Spain’s other regions after Francisco Franco’s rule ended in 1975. While independence has had relatively strong support in recent years, a final decision has remained elusive due to inconclusive elections, referenda, and political opposition from Madrid. The 2017 referendum recorded 92% of respondents favoring Catalan independence. However, only 43% of registered voters voted in the election marred by domestic and national opposition. The government nonetheless pushed through, declaring itself independent on October 27th. Declaring the referendum and declaration illegal, Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy dismissed the Catalan Generalitat and renewed elections. Puigdemont and his cabinet subsequently fled to Brussels, the headquarters of the European Union. This committee takes place in Catalonia, but Puigdemont remains in exile and his former vice president, Oriol Junqueras, remains in prison. This cabinet consists of fifteen members of Junts pel Sí (Together for Yes) who had not been prosecuted by the Spanish Government after the referendum, and five Spanish representatives sent from Madrid to ensure compliance. Each Catalan member will have access to powers retained after the dissolution of parliament and powers temporarily withheld by Madrid in response to the crisis. Each Spanish member starts with greater powers given by the Spanish government, but will lose some power if and when Madrid deems the situation more under control. -
Briefing #12/2019
BRIEFING #12/2019 A HUNDRED YEARS OF INJUSTICE On 14th October, Spain’s Supreme Court made public its verdict convicting nine political and civil society pro-independence leaders of sedition and sentencing them to a total of 99 years and 6 months of prison and to a similar ban from holding public office1. It is worth remembering that, as pointed out in a communiqué by Agora Judicial- a professional association of judges- “Those found guilty worked together in the calling and the organisation of a referendum on self-determination and that, in itself, is not a crime (...). Such was the decision of the [Spanish] Parliament in 2005 when it excluded from the Criminal Code the call of a referendum without legal base.” Similarly, magistrate and jurist Joaquim Bosch claims that “(…) the verdict attributes to the pro-independence public officials the authorship of sedition through a stream of behaviours linked to the call of the referendum and their calls to go to vote. That attribution of guilt also generates legal doubts, because holding illegal referendums is a conduct that was decriminalized. And encouraging citizens to vote cannot criminalize the summoners for the crimes that may occur subsequently. If it is not a crime to hold a referendum, even less so calling to participate in the consultation. For instance, those who call to take part in a peaceful demonstration cannot be responsible for the offenses that may occur in it. There is no causal link. However, the sentence considers several public officials responsible for sedition, while admitting that they did not participate in acts of passive resistance, nor did they encourage the sitting downs to hinder the actions of [police] agents”. -
The Regions of Spain
© 2017 American University Model United Nations Conference All rights reserved. No part of this background guide may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever without express written permission from the American University Model United Nations Conference Secretariat. Please direct all questions to [email protected] A NOTE Julia Clark Chair Estimats Diputats del Parlament de Catalunya, Dear Diputats of the Parliament of Catalonia, My name is Julia Clark and I’ll be serving as your Chair for the Parliament of Catalonia. I cannot wait to meet all of you in February. Time is of the essence and the Catalan Republic needs creating! As for a little bit about myself: MUN is my life! Last year, I served on the AmeriMUNC Secretariat as the Charges D’Affaires and currently I am an Assistant Head Delegate of the AU Model United Nations competitive travel team. I have done MUN for seven years, competing at 24 conferences across the US and Canada, and I once chaired a conference in the Netherlands! I’m proud to say that AmeriMUNC will be my eighth time chairing. Outside of MUN, I am also the President of my sorority, Phi Mu. If you have any questions about greek life or collegiate MUN, I’d love to chat via email or at the conference. I’m personally very excited to be forming our own new nation, the Catalan Republic. I just studied abroad for four months in Madrid, Spain and was at the center of the real life action surrounding the Catalan independence movement. -
Press Release 7/2020
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SPAIN Office of the President Press Office PRESS RELEASE NO. 7/2020 THE PLENARY OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT UNANIMOUSLY REJECTS THE APPEAL FOR AMPARO FILED BY PUIGDEMONT ET AL. AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT THAT PREVENTED TURULL FROM GOING TO THE PARLIAMENT FOR HIS INAUGURATION AS PRESIDENT BECAUSE THE JUDICIAL PROCESS HAD NOT BEEN EXHAUSTED The Plenary of the Constitutional Court has unanimously rejected the appeal for constitutional protection (amparo) filed by Carles Puigdemont, Jordi Sánchez, Jordi Turull, Josep Rull and 30 deputies from the Parliament of Catalonia because the judicial process has not been exhausted. This appeal is lodged against the Supreme Court ruling of 23 March 2018, which ordered the measure of preventive detention without bail but with visiting rights for Jordi Turull, when he had already been proposed as candidate for the Presidency of the Catalonian Government and the first debate and voting process for his inauguration had already taken place (22 March 2018). The appellants claimed that their right to political participation had been infringed. To them, they had been prevented from attending to and voting at the second session of Mr. Turull’s inauguration, as he had been put under preventive detention and, therefore, he could not be present at this parliamentary event. The judgment, whose judge rapporteur was Antonio Narváez, explains that “the appellants neither used any means for challenge, nor did they submit to the investigating judge or the Appeals Chamber of the Supreme Court any document to complain about the violation of their rights”. On the contrary, “they directly and immediately filed an appeal for amparo before this Court, without trying to lodge the corresponding appeal for second instance or adhering at least to the one filed by Jordi Turull’s representation. -
Should Politicians Be Prosecuted for Statements Made in the Exercise of Their Mandate?
Provisional version Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Should politicians be prosecuted for statements made in the exercise of their mandate? Report Rapporteur: Mr Boriss Cilevičs, Latvia, Socialists, Democrats and Greens Group A. Draft resolution 1. The Assembly stresses the crucial importance, in a living democracy, of politicians being able to freely exercise their mandates. This requires a particularly high level of protection of politicians’ freedom of speech and freedom of assembly, both in parliament and when speaking to their constituents in public meetings or through the media. 2. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR, the Convention) protects everyone’s freedom of speech, including the right to make statements that “shock or disturb” those who do not share the same opinions, as established in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (the Court). 3. The Assembly also notes that freedom of speech is not unlimited. Hate speech condoning violence against certain persons or groups of persons on the grounds of race, origin, religion or political opinions, as well as calls for the violent overthrow of democratic institutions are not protected. Politicians even have a special responsibility, due to their high visibility, to refrain from such abuses. 4. Everyone, and in particular politicians, has the right to make proposals whose implementation would require changes of the constitution, provided the means advocated are peaceful and legal and the objectives do not run contrary to the fundamental principles of democracy and human rights. 5. This includes calls to change a centralist constitution into a federal or confederal one, or vice versa, or to change the legal status and powers of territorial (local and regional) entities, including to grant them a high degree of autonomy or even independence. -
Three Court Rulings and a Funeral
LAWFARE: THE JUDICIALIZATION OF POLITICS OR THE POLITICIZATION OF JUSTICE Three court rulings and a funeral David Fernàndez The Spanish police trying to get inside the Diputació Primary School in Barcelona during the Catalan referendum on October 1, 2017, in front of several voters' resistance. Picture by Jordi Borràs «Posterity will not be able to believe that, After the light has come on, We would have had to live again In the midst of such dense darkness» Castellio, De arte dubitandi (1562) Compass and rear-view mirror, long road and short pass, it takes retrospective and perspective – and a radical rooting in the present – to end up understanding everything that happens to us from the perspective of accelerated global and local regression against civil, social and political rights. A blatant regression, uneven and arbitrary that has been exacerbated over the last two decades throughout the world and, in the last three years, has been unleashed against Catalan and Spanish society in a very unequal ways – some suffering from it, others legitimising it. Against all odds, this comes from afar and some want it to PÀGINA 1 / 11 last. The regression is rooted in a double international and state process. Alternatively, in a single merged one, if you like, with particular Spanish specificities. The global one is the already unquestionable regression and the disturbing demolition of the so-called post-war social constitutionalism, which is already moving between world un-democratisation, global Weimar and what we call post-democratic authoritarianism. The local-particular one is what we call the 78 regime, mediated by the current democratic involution in Spain and incubated penal reform after penal reform -thirty since 1995. -
Moltes Gràcies President. Senyores I Senyors Diputats, MH President Mas
Moltes gràcies president. Senyores i senyors diputats, MH president Mas, MH president Benach, MH presidenta de Gispert, Excma. senyora Conesa, representants electes al Congrés i al Senat, consellera Borràs, autoritats, senyores i senyors que ens segueixen des de l’hemicicle i des de la resta de sala habilitades, i als que ens segueixen a través dels mitjans de comunicació arreu del país, també una salutació molt afectuosa, més afectuosa que mai als familiars dels presos i dels exiliats. Tanben as aranesi que mos seguissen des dera Val. Jo avui no hauria de ser aquí. Jo no hauria d'estar fent aquest discurs d'investidura i tampoc no hauria de demanar-los la confiança per a un programa de govern. Avui, aquí, ara, hauria de ser-hi el president legítim de Catalunya, el MH Sr. Carles Puigdemont. I hauria de ser ell, adreçant-se en llibertat a aquesta cambra, qui els exposés el programa de govern per al nostre país. I a ell l'haurien d'acompanyar tots els presos polítics i exiliats que tampoc poden ser aquí. També ells, lliures i amb nosaltres i les seves famílies, haurien de poder-lo escoltar. Siguin, doncs, les meves primeres paraules per a enviar un record emocionat a tots els qui, pel simple fet de permetre votar al poble de Catalunya, són avui privats dels seus drets, privats de llibertat sense sentència, ostatges d'un Estat que ha vulnerat les regles democràtiques més elementals. No poden ser aquí ni els nostres companys diputats, el President Puigdemont, el vicepresident Junqueras, els consellers Jordi Turull i Josep Rull, ni el president del nostre Grup Parlamentari, Jordi Sánchez. -
International BRIEFING the Case
The Spanish Supreme Court’s decision on the self-determination referendum in Catalonia held on 1 October 2017 Report by: Ferran Requejo (dir.) Gerard Martín Helena Mora Albert Morales Linguistic adaptation from Catalan to English: Ander Errasti and Mireia Grau. Barcelona, December 2020 © Generalitat de Catalunya. Government of Catalonia Institut d’Estudis de l’Autogovern. Institute of Self-Government Studies (http://presidencia.gencat.cat/iea) Design: Autonomous Entity of the Official Gazette and the Publications Dept. Contents 1. Introduction. Purpose of this briefing ............................................................................ 07 2. Summary of the report .................................................................................................. 10 2.1 The use of language in the Supreme Court’s decision ............................................. 10 2.2 Pleas of facts ............................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Individual and collective rights at stake ................................................................... 13 2.4 The typology of the crimes ...................................................................................... 16 2.5 The allocation of responsibilities and the prison sentences for the prosecuted individuals ................................................................................................................ 18 3. Four final remarks looking at the future ........................................................................ -
KT 1-11-2016 .Qxp Layout 1
SUBSCRIPTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2016 SAFAR 1, 1438 AH www.kuwaittimes.net MoI keen to Indian police Cubs edge Bumper equip police gun down Indians to Madrid deal with latest escaped Islamist extend World banks Bale technology2 prisoners12 Series20 dream over20 €115m Amir opens new Sheikh Jaber Min 21º Al-Ahmad Cultural Center Max 38º High Tide 00:10 & 13:25 Italian tenor Bocelli, top Kuwaiti artistes perform at launch Low Tide 07:10 & 19:03 40 PAGES NO: 17037 150 FILS KUWAIT: Under the auspices of HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah and with the Amir in attendance, the inauguration ceremony of the Sheikh Jaber Al-Ahmad Cultural Center was held yesterday, fea- turing a spectacular show that combined international and local music. The ceremony was attended by HH the Crown Prince Sheikh Nawaf Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, Qatar’s Sheikha Moza bint Nasser, former National Assembly Speaker Marzouq Al-Ghanem, senior sheikhs, HH Sheikh Nasser Al-Mohammad Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, HH the Prime Minister Sheikh Jaber Al-Mubarak Al-Hamad Al- Sabah and other senior state officials. The ceremony kicked off with the national anthem followed by a speech by the Deputy Minister of Amiri Diwan Affairs Sheikh Ali Al-Jarrah Al-Sabah. “Today is a momentous day, as a cultural landmark, the Jaber Al- Ahmad Cultural Center has been opened,” Sheikh Ali said. He added that HH the Amir’s attendance augments SEE PAGE 3 the joy of the occasion, noting that the center will be instrumental to the development of the cultural sector in the country.