DOCSLIB.ORG

Party of the Regions, Tymoshenko Bloc Top Polls in Parliamentary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Party of the Regions, Tymoshenko Bloc Top Polls in Parliamentary INSIDE:• Map reveals election winners by oblast — page 3. • Voters in Kyiv and Lviv elect new mayors — page 3. • International observers assess Ukraine’s elections — page 5. Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXIV HE KRAINIANNo. 14 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 2, 2006 EEKLY$1/$2 in Ukraine PartyT of the Regions,U Tymoshenko Bloc top polls inW parliamentary elections by Zenon Zawada Ms. Tymoshenko’s popularity has Oblast, which gave the most votes to Kyiv Press Bureau soared since the 2002 elections, when Socialist Party of Ukraine in 2002, and the her bloc earned 1.9 million votes, or the Kirovohrad Oblast, which the Communist KYIV – The Party of the Regions of support of 7 percent of the electorate. Party of Ukraine had previously won. CEC releases Ukraine emerged from the March 26 par- The Tymoshenko Bloc even won the liamentary elections with the most votes, Sumy Oblast, where Mr. Yushchenko but it was Yulia Tymoshenko who was final results was born and raised, winning 33 percent With 100 percent of the ballots crowned the winner. of the vote compared to 19 percent for counted, the Central Election Defying most expectations, her politi- Our Ukraine. Commission on Thursday evening, cal bloc placed second in voting, steam- The Tymoshenko Bloc also made March 30, released the following rollering over the Our Ukraine bloc and gains in regions that Our Ukraine could results of Ukraine’s parliamentary handing her rival and former boss Viktor never succeed in. elections of March 26. Yushchenko an embarrassing defeat. In five oblasts that typically vote for In giving her the majority of their pro-Russian parties or blocs, the votes, Ukraine’s Orange electorate Party of the Regions 32.12% Tymoshenko Bloc placed second, despite passed the revolution’s torch to Ms. Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc 22.27% Tymoshenko, seizing it away from Mr. the presence of prominent nationalists Our Ukraine 13.94% Yushchenko who disappointed many such as Levko Lukianenko and Andrii Socialist Party 5.67% when he fired her in September 2005 and Shkil in her party’s leadership. Communist Party 3.66% signed a pact with Viktor Yanukovych In the Kherson Oblast for example, Natalia Vitrenko Bloc* 2.93% soon there after. the bloc won 17 percent of the vote. It Lytvyn’s People’s Bloc* 2.43% When it became clear that her bloc won 15 percent of the vote in the Kostenko/Pliusch Bloc* 1.87% would finish a strong second, Ms. Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, where Ms. Viche Party* 1.74% Tymoshenko called upon the Ukrainian Tymoshenko grew up. Pora/Reforms and Order* 1.47% president on March 27 to recreate the While Ms. Tymoshenko enlarged her “Ne Tak!” Bloc* 1.01% Orange coalition in the Verkhovna Rada, political sphere of influence, the Party of with the intent that she’d be at the helm the Regions secured a plurality in every *Did not reach the 3% support as prime minister once again. single one of its oblasts from the 2004 required for representation in the “Either we, for the last 10 years, Cutty Sark Co. presidential elections, as well as the Verkhovna Rada. fought for the result that oligarchs and Yulia Tymoshenko at a March 27 press Autonomous Republic of Crimea. NB: Thirty-four parties received clans would not simultaneously be the conference calls for an Orange coalition. As widely expected, the Party of the less than 1 percent of the vote. political power in Ukraine, and today we (Continued on page 11) have a victory in that struggle, or we So, while the Our Ukraine bloc kept return to the same road that was personi- all the symbols and slogans of the fied by [former President Leonid] Orange Revolution, it was Ms. Kuchma,” Ms. Tymoshenko said, refer- Tymoshenko who managed to hold onto International observers say ring to the possibility that an Our the hearts and minds of those who stood Ukraine-Party of the Regions coalition on Kyiv’s Independence Square, known would be formed. as the maidan. elections were free and fair About 22 percent of the electorate, or The Tymoshenko Bloc won 13 of 5.6 million voters, cast their ballots for Ukraine’s 24 oblasts, conquering 11 by Zenon Zawada “In our view, Ukraine has proved itself the Tymoshenko Bloc, according to the oblasts that Our Ukraine had won in the Kyiv Press Bureau up to the task,” said Michael Trend, a former member of the British Parliament Central Election Commission’s (CEC) 2002 parliamentary elections. KYIV – Ukraine’s 2006 parliamentary final results posted on March 30. The bloc also won in the Poltava who led the International Republican elections were the most free and fair Institute’s election observation team. “All since the nation gained independence freedom-loving people will recognize nearly 15 years ago, international these elections as a success for Ukraine,” An election day snapshot: observers said. he added. Instead of dealing with fraud and vio- Mr. Trend said he couldn’t comment balloting in Cherkasy Oblast lence, problems were limited to those of on how the elections might influence a technical nature, such as polling sta- Ukraine’s aspirations for European tions that opened late, voter lists that had by Zenon Zawada Valentyna Vitkivska, 54. “During Soviet Union membership. incorrect or missing names and long lines Ukraine’s political leaders didn’t have Kyiv Press Bureau times, we didn’t live too badly. I educat- to vote, they said. ed myself. I obtained a free apartment the same high praise for their elections as TALNE, Ukraine – The Cherkasy “The citizens of Ukraine have freed Western observers. and a free education.” themselves of their fear,” said U.S. Oblast was a wild card in the 2006 par- It was very common for family mem- Holding what she charged was an liamentary election. Federal Judge Bohdan Futey, who visited improperly completed protocol sheet in bers or married couples to be split in eight polling stations in Chernihiv and Our Ukraine had won it in the 2002 their political leanings. her hands, Yulia Tymoshenko told a elections, but Oleksander Moroz and his Kyiv. March 29 press conference that her cam- Kin Horholov, 68, said he chose the Having Ukrainian elections since Socialist Party of Ukraine were always Socialist Party because he trusts Mr. paign staff had collected and documented popular among its rural inhabitants, 1990, he noted that the Orange numerous examples of fraud committed Moroz, who isn’t beholden to business Revolution had created the conditions for which make up 46 percent of the oblast’s interests. at various district election commissions. Ukraine’s first truly democratic elections. population. His wife, Raisa Horholova, 65, voted As expected, voting recounts were “There’s no more fear, and they In the town of Talne, with a population for the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc because demanded by the leaders of those parties approached these elections very realisti- of more than 16,000, the wide spectrum she believes the former prime minister is and blocs that failed to break the 3 per- cally and calmly,” Judge Futey said. of political views in Ukraine’s heartland an educated, thoughtful woman who did cent barrier for the Verkhovna Rada. “Without fear, they’ll have success.” oblast was apparent. a lot for Ukraine during her months in Among these were Volodymyr The Ukrainian Weekly’s Kyiv Press office, particularly for its children. The successful parliamentary elections Lytvyn’s People’s Bloc, the Pora- Bureau interviewed 12 voters who named “Ms. Tymoshenko endured a lot and were a critical step for Ukraine in Reforms and Order Bloc, the National seven different parties they were support- had many obstacles in her job,” Mrs. demonstrating it is a country that holds Democratic Party and the Viche Party. ing. Some were less known, while others Horholova said. “I admire this woman for democratic values and is capable of “[We] acknowledge the election were notorious. upholding Western standards of democra- “I will vote for the Communists,” said (Continued on page 27) cy, observers said. (Continued on page 10) 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 2, 2006 No. 14 ANALYSIS NEWSBRIEFS Has the Orange Revolution NEWSBRIEFS Yushchenko vows to work for coalition path [toward restoring an Orange coalition] is absolutely possible, and we are beginning received a new lease on life? KYIV – President Viktor Yushchenko today to conduct practical consultations and said in a television interview on March 23 make steps toward rapprochement,” Ms. by Jan Maksymiuk finish second with 22 to 24 percent of the that he will actively participate in forging a Tymoshenko told journalists. Mr. Moroz RFE/RL Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova Report vote, while the pro-Yushchenko Our new governing coalition after the March 26 said of his meeting with President March 28 Ukraine will follow with about 15 per- parliamentary elections, Interfax-Ukraine Yushchenko: “We have not reached any cent, according to the polls. reported. Mr. Yushchenko said he is con- agreement with anybody, as there are only The March 26 parliamentary elections These predicted results suggest that vinced that the Our Ukraine bloc will form preliminary talks. ... Since there are no offi- in Ukraine were won by Viktor the three forces that made up the core of the core of such a coalition, which, he cial returns from the elections, there can be Yanukovych’s Party of the Regions with the 2004 Orange Revolution – the Yulia added, should also include the Yulia no final documents on the coalition.” The from 27 to 31 percent of the vote, accord- Tymoshenko Bloc, Our Ukraine and the Tymoshenko Bloc, the Pora-Reform and Party of the Regions press service reported ing to three different exit polls.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2011, No.34
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: Yushchenko testifi es against Tymoshenko – page 3 Diaspora leaders comment on today’s Ukraine – page 4 Experts/scholars on independent Ukraine at 20 – page 8 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXIX No. 34 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, AUGUST 21, 2011 $1/$2 in Ukraine Chrystyna Lapychak/The Ukrainian Weekly August 24, 1991: The scene inside the Verkhovna Rada after the vote for Ukraine’s independence. Members of the democratic bloc carry in a huge Ukrainian flag, which had been draped over one of the tanks protecting the Russian Parliament building at the time of the attempted coup in the Soviet Union. Movers and shakers comment on Ukraine at 20 by Mark Raczkiewycz Some submissions metaphorically com- entered college, had become the boxing dated Soviet model. This is one of the rea- Special to The Ukrainian Weekly pared to Ukraine to an adolescent entering champion of Ukraine, had travelled abroad sons that for 20 years of independence we his teens, albeit with stunted growth. and had tasted life different from that in the have not achieved the same success in KYIV – To mark the 20th anniversary of Others emphasized the unique opportu- Soviet Union. Therefore, I, like many building a state, as the Baltic states or the the re-establishment of Ukraine’s indepen- nity and potential that Ukraine has to Ukrainians, perceived the political events Georgians, our former neighbors in the dence, The Ukrainian Weekly asked some become a geopolitical player in Europe, but of the early ‘90s optimistically because we Soviet Union, who have been independent of Ukraine’s political, civic and cultural lamented that the country has taken every had a chance to start a new life.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine Ukraine at a Glance: 2002-03
    COUNTRY REPORT Ukraine Ukraine at a glance: 2002-03 OVERVIEW Efforts by both pro- and anti-presidential forces to gain the upper hand in the parliamentary election due by March 2002 will increasingly dominate the political scene. The president, Leonid Kuchma, and his parliamentary allies are likely to succeed in using their superior administrative and media resources to limit the gains of their opponents. The government will remain in power until the 2002 election and is unlikely to roll back its predecessor’s reform achievements, although electoral politics will preclude further significant reforms. The economy will grow at a more moderate pace in 2002-03, following buoyant growth in 2001. Year-end inflation will rise slightly to 12% in 2002, owing to further price liberalisation and election- related policy loosening, before falling again in 2003. Sustained export growth will ensure current-account surpluses in 2002-03, although these will narrow because of strengthening import demand and continued real currency appreciation. Key changes from last month Political outlook • The former prime minister Viktor Yushchenko looks increasingly likely to try to build an alliance for the 2002 election that is more centre- than reform-based. Economic policy outlook • Multilateral financing has resumed as expected, and should now permit completion of Ukraine’s Paris Club debts. The narrowing of the budget surplus in August underlines the Economist Intelligence Unit’s forecast that the government is likely to end the year with a slight budget deficit. Economic forecast • Preliminary trade data for the start of the third quarter has prompted a slight revision in our trade surplus forecast for this year.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Political Corruption in Ukraine
    NATIONAL SECURITY & DEFENCE π 7 (111) CONTENTS POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE: ACTORS, MANIFESTATIONS, 2009 PROBLEMS OF COUNTERING (Analytical Report) ................................................................................................... 2 Founded and published by: SECTION 1. POLITICAL CORRUPTION AS A PHENOMENON: APPROACHES TO DEFINITION ..................................................................3 SECTION 2. POLITICAL CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE: POTENTIAL ACTORS, AREAS, MANIFESTATIONS, TRENDS ...................................................................8 SECTION 3. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COUNTERING UKRAINIAN CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC & POLITICAL STUDIES POLITICAL CORRUPTION ......................................................................33 NAMED AFTER OLEXANDER RAZUMKOV SECTION 4. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSALS ......................................................... 40 ANNEX 1 FOREIGN ASSESSMENTS OF THE POLITICAL CORRUPTION Director General Anatoliy Rachok LEVEL IN UKRAINE (INTERNATIONAL CORRUPTION RATINGS) ............43 Editor-in-Chief Yevhen Shulha ANNEX 2 POLITICAL CORRUPTION: SPECIFICITY, SCALE AND WAYS Layout and design Oleksandr Shaptala OF COUNTERING IN EXPERT ASSESSMENTS ......................................44 Technical & computer support Volodymyr Kekuh ANNEX 3 POLITICAL CORRUPTION: SCALE AND WAYS OF COUNTERING IN PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS AND ASSESSMENTS ...................................49 This magazine is registered with the State Committee ARTICLE of Ukraine for Information Policy, POLITICAL
    [Show full text]
  • For Free Distribution
    ELECTIONS LeGAL ASSESSMENT US AMBASSADOR GeOFFREY PYATT IN UKRAINE OF THE 2014 RuSSO-UKRAINIAN WAR ON CHALLENGES FOR UKRAINE № 14 (80) NOVEMBER 2014 WWW.UKRAINIANWEEK.COM Featuring selected content from The Economist FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION |CONTENTS BRIEFING Lobbymocracy: Ukraine does not have Rapid Response Elections: The victory adequate support in the West, either in of pro-European parties must be put political circles, or among experts. The to work toward rapid and irreversible situation with the mass media and civil reforms. Otherwise it will quickly turn society is slightly better into an equally impressive defeat 28 4 Leonidas Donskis: An imagined dialogue on several clichés and misperceptions POLITICS 30 Starting a New Life, Voting as Before: Elections in the Donbas NEIGHBOURS 8 Russia’s gangster regime – the real story Broken Democracy on the Frontline: “Unhappy, poorly dressed people, 31 mostly elderly, trudged to the polls Karen Dawisha, the author of Putin’s to cast their votes for one of the Kleptocracy, on the loyalty of the Russian richest people in Donetsk Oblast” President’s team, the role of Ukraine in his grip 10 on power, and on Russia’s money in Europe Poroshenko’s Blunders: 32 The President’s bloc is painfully The Bear, Master of itsT aiga Lair: reminiscent of previous political Russians support the Kremlin’s path towards self-isolation projects that failed bitterly and confrontation with the West, ignoring the fact that they don’t have a realistic chance of becoming another 12 pole of influence in the world 2014
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine and Occupied Crimea
    y gathering 39 local scholars, experts, and civil society activists specialized in racism and human rights, the fourth edition of the European Islamophobia Report addresses a still timely and politically important issue. All 34 country Breports included in this book follow a unique structure that is convenient, first, for com- EUROPEAN paring country reports and, second, for selected readings on a particular topic such as politics, employment, or education with regards to Islamophobia across Europe. ISLAMOPHOBIA The present report investigates in detail the underlying dynamics that directly or indirectly support the rise of anti-Muslim racism in Europe. This extends from Islamophobic state- ments spread in national media to laws and policies that restrain the fundamental rights REPORT of European Muslim citizens. As a result, the European Islamophobia Report 2018 dis- cusses the impact of anti-Muslim discourse on human rights, multiculturalism, and the 2018 state of law in Europe. This fourth edition of our report highlights how European societies are challenged by the ENES BAYRAKLI • FARID HAFEZ (Eds) rise of violent far-right groups that do not only preach hatred of Muslims but also partici- pate in the organization of bloody terror attacks. The rise of far-right terrorist groups such as AFO (Action of Operational Forces) in France or the network Hannibal in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland confirms EUROPOL’s alarming surveys on the growing danger of right-wing terrorism. This year, SETA worked in cooperation with the Leopold Weiss Institute, an Austrian NGO based in Vienna dedicated to the research of Muslims in Europe. In addition, the Euro- pean Union has funded the European Islamophobia Report 2018 through the program EUROPEAN ISLAMOPHOBIA REPORT 2018 “Civil Society Dialogue Between EU and Turkey (CSD-V)”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Presidential Election Result
    BULLETIN No. 21 (97) February 8, 2010 © PISM COMMENTARY Editors: Sławomir Dębski (Editor-in-Chief), Łukasz Adamski, Mateusz Gniazdowski, Beata Górka-Winter, Leszek Jesień, Agnieszka Kondek (Executive Editor), Łukasz Kulesa, Marek Madej, Ernest Wyciszkiewicz Ukraine’s Presidential Election Result Łukasz Adamski By securing a narrow majority of electoral support, Viktor Yanukovych triumphed over Yulia Tymoshenko in Ukraine’s presidential election. His contender may feel inclined to challenge the legitimacy of the vote, an effort in all probability doomed to failure. In the coming months Yanukovych is expected to oust Tymoshenko as Prime Minister and form a favouring government. With 48.95% of the popular vote, Yanukovych outdid rival Tymoshenko who scored slightly fewer votes, closing at 45.47%. The total of 4.4% of the ballots were cast against the two main contenders, thus giving the winner less than 50% of the votes. The insignificant difference in the number of ballots cast for each of the candidates may push Tymoshenko to seek an appeal requesting the courts to nullify the election result. In her election night address she failed to acknowledge Yanukovych’s victory. Even before the ballot her campaign team warned of Yanukovych’s fraudulent plans and advertised irregularities in the elections statute. What may underlie the potential attempt to undermine the election result will not be the desire for the ballot to be run again (a scenario having little chances of success in light of positive appraisal of the vote by monitoring teams) but rather the hope to persuade Yanukovych and his Party of Regions to seek compromise with the PM currently in office.
    [Show full text]
  • Decommunization, Memory Laws, and “Builders of Ukraine in the 20Th Century”*
    ACTA SLAVICA IAPONICA, TOMUS 39, PP. 1–22 Articles Decommunization, Memory Laws, and “Builders of Ukraine in the 20th Century”* David R. Marples INTRODUCTION This paper provides a critical overview of the Decommunization campaign in Ukraine up to the spring of 2017, which marked two years since the beginning of the program introduced by the four Memory Laws ratified by Ukraine’s president Petro Poroshenko in May 2015. In reality, the process of removing Soviet statues and memorabilia began well before Euromaidan, especially in Western Ukraine where Lenin monuments and others of the Soviet period were swiftly removed from the late 1980s into the early years of independence.1 But I address the formal campaign headed by the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance (hereafter referred to as INR), which began in the spring of 2015. I provide an analysis of the program and its results, the results of opinion polls, some critiques and also the reasons why it remains controversial, particularly outside Ukraine. The particular focus is 20th century “builders of Ukrainian independence” as defined by these laws because this question has solicited the most attention, along with the physical changes that have resulted to the map of Ukraine, mon- uments, and memorials. Decommunization has a wider context than the Mem- ory Laws, including a program of administrative decentralization and a new Education Law, introduced in draft form on September 5 and approved by the president on September 25, 2017, which will gradually render the Ukrainian language as the only language of instruction in schools and higher educational institutions.2 Clearly the decentralization program cannot be fulfilled while a conflict situation remains in the eastern parts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kremlin-Linked Forces in Ukraine's 2019 Elections
    Études de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Reports 25 KREMLIN-LINKED FORCES IN UKRAINE’S 2019 ELECTIONS On the Brink of Revenge? Vladislav INOZEMTSEV February 2019 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-36567-981-7 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2019 How to quote this document: Vladislav Inozemtsev, “Kremlin-Linked Forces in Ukraine’s 2019 Elections: On the Brink of Revenge?”, Russie.NEI.Reports, No. 25, Ifri, February 2019. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Author Dr Vladislav Inozemtsev (b. 1968) is a Russian economist and political researcher since 1999, with a PhD in Economics. In 1996 he founded the Moscow-based Center for Post-Industrial Studies and has been its Director ever since. In recent years, he served as Senior or Visiting Fellow with the Institut fur die Wissenschaften vom Menschen in Vienna, with the Polski Instytut Studiów Zaawansowanych in Warsaw, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik in Berlin, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Johns Hopkins University in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • CDDRL Number 114 WORKING PAPERS June 2009
    CDDRL Number 114 WORKING PAPERS June 2009 Youth Movements in Post- Communist Societies: A Model of Nonviolent Resistance Olena Nikolayenko Stanford University Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Additional working papers appear on CDDRL’s website: http://cddrl.stanford.edu. Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Stanford University Encina Hall Stanford, CA 94305 Phone: 650-724-7197 Fax: 650-724-2996 http://cddrl.stanford.edu/ About the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) CDDRL was founded by a generous grant from the Bill and Flora Hewlett Foundation in October in 2002 as part of the Stanford Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. The Center supports analytic studies, policy relevant research, training and outreach activities to assist developing countries in the design and implementation of policies to foster growth, democracy, and the rule of law. About the Author Olena Nikolayenko (Ph.D. Toronto) is a Visiting Postdoctoral Scholar and a recipient of the 2007-2009 post-doctoral fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Her research interests include comparative democratization, public opinion, social movements, youth, and corruption. In her dissertation, she analyzed political support among the first post-Soviet generation grown up without any direct experience with communism in Russia and Ukraine. Her current research examines why some youth movements are more successful than others in applying methods of nonviolent resistance to mobilize the population in non-democracies. She has recently conducted fieldwork in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Serbia, and Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine at the Crossroad in Post-Communist Europe: Policymaking and the Role of Foreign Actors Ryan Barrett [email protected]
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Dissertations UMSL Graduate Works 1-20-2018 Ukraine at the Crossroad in Post-Communist Europe: Policymaking and the Role of Foreign Actors Ryan Barrett [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Barrett, Ryan, "Ukraine at the Crossroad in Post-Communist Europe: Policymaking and the Role of Foreign Actors" (2018). Dissertations. 725. https://irl.umsl.edu/dissertation/725 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the UMSL Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ukraine at the Crossroad in Post-Communist Europe: Policymaking and the Role of Foreign Actors Ryan Barrett M.A. Political Science, The University of Missouri - Saint Louis, 2015 M.A. International Relations, Webster University, 2010 B.A. International Studies, 2006 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School at the The University of Missouri - Saint Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor Philosophy in Political Science May 2018 Advisory Committee: Joyce Mushaben, Ph.D. Jeanne Wilson, PhD. Kenny Thomas, Ph.D. David Kimball, Ph.D. Contents Introduction 1 Chapter I. Policy Formulation 30 Chapter II. Reform Initiatives 84 Chapter III. Economic Policy 122 Chapter IV. Energy Policy 169 Chapter V. Security and Defense Policy 199 Conclusion 237 Appendix 246 Bibliography 248 To the Pat Tillman Foundation for graciously sponsoring this important research Introduction: Ukraine at a Crossroads Ukraine, like many European countries, has experienced a complex history and occupies a unique geographic position that places it in a peculiar situation be- tween its liberal future and communist past; it also finds itself tugged in two opposing directions by the gravitational forces of Russia and the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Temptation to Control
    PrESS frEEDOM IN UKRAINE : TEMPTATION TO CONTROL ////////////////// REPORT BY JEAN-FRANÇOIS JULLIARD AND ELSA VIDAL ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// AUGUST 2010 /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// PRESS FREEDOM: REPORT OF FACT-FINDING VISIT TO UKRAINE ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 2 Natalia Negrey / public action at Mykhaylivska Square in Kiev in November of 2009 Many journalists, free speech organisations and opposition parliamentarians are concerned to see the government becoming more and more remote and impenetrable. During a public meeting on 20 July between Reporters Without Borders and members of the Ukrainian parliament’s Committee of Enquiry into Freedom of Expression, parliamentarian Andrei Shevchenko deplored not only the increase in press freedom violations but also, and above all, the disturbing and challenging lack of reaction from the government. The data gathered by the organisation in the course of its monitoring of Ukraine confirms that there has been a significant increase in reports of press freedom violations since Viktor Yanukovych’s election as president in February. LEGISlaTIVE ISSUES The government’s desire to control journalists is reflected in the legislative domain. Reporters Without Borders visited Ukraine from 19 to 21 July in order to accomplish The Commission for Establishing Freedom the first part of an evaluation of the press freedom situation. of Expression, which was attached to the presi- It met national and local media representatives, members of press freedom dent’s office, was dissolved without explanation NGOs (Stop Censorship, Telekritika, SNUJ and IMI), ruling party and opposition parliamentarians and representatives of the prosecutor-general’s office. on 2 April by a decree posted on the president’s At the end of this initial visit, Reporters Without Borders gave a news conference website on 9 April.
    [Show full text]
  • IFES Faqs on Elections in Ukraine
    Elections in Ukraine 2019 Presidential Election Frequently Asked Questions Europe and Eurasia International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Floor 10 | Arlington, VA 22202 | www.IFES.org March 22, 2019 Frequently Asked Questions When is Election Day? ................................................................................................................................... 1 Why is this election important? .................................................................................................................... 1 What is the role of the president? ................................................................................................................ 1 What is the legal framework governing the elections? ................................................................................ 1 What is the electoral system? ....................................................................................................................... 2 Who are the candidates? .............................................................................................................................. 2 How are elections administered? ................................................................................................................. 3 Who can vote in these elections? ................................................................................................................. 4 How do citizens register to vote? ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]