DOCSLIB.ORG

Memorialization of the National Socialist Aktion T4 Euthanasia Programme

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Lives Worthy of Life and Remembrance: Memorialization of the National Socialist Aktion T4 Euthanasia Programme by Meaghan Ann Hepburn A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures University of Toronto © Copyright by Meaghan Ann Hepburn 2014 Meaghan Ann Hepburn Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (2014) Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures University of Toronto “Lives Worthy of Life and Remembrance: Memorialization of the National Socialist Aktion T4 Euthanasia Programme Abstract It is estimated that over 70,000 German and Austrian victims deemed mentally and physically disabled by the Nazis lost their lives in the National Socialist euthanasia programmed entitled Aktion T4. These murders prove to be the first instance of mass gassings of a selection of society deemed unwanted, and provided the intellectual and technological framework that was employed in the Extermination Camps. And yet a void in memorialization exists for the topic. Deficient memorialization of such a historically important event in German and Austrian society raises questions as to why this Nazi programme was not memorialized to the same degree as other historical events and victim groups of the Holocaust. The scarce number of representations of the victims in the forms of literature, art, monuments and memorials is indicative of a reluctance or selective remembering of the topic in WWII memorialization practices. The void in memorialization of Aktion T4 is founded in three important and influential factors. Firstly, the negative stigmas associated with mental and physical disabilities, both in confronting the topic, but also presenting it on public display. Secondly, the legal issues in that only a very few number of doctors, caregivers, or commanders of the killing centres were prosecuted and sentenced for their crimes, but rather continued to practice without any repercussions. Finally, the addressing of the topic of German suffering and the representation of German people as victims, and not solely as the perpetrators of WWII. This complex dichotomy ii of presenting German people as both victims and perpetrators within the same action results in a political nervousness and general avoidance. The topic of Aktion T4 memorialization is pertinent as it speaks not only to the history of the mentally and physically disabled victims, but also to the treatment of people with disabilities today. The memorialization of Aktion T4 and the representation of its victims is an important topic which has been long delegated to the margins of Holocaust memory work. These first victims represent a selected eradication of a group of society deemed unworthy of life, and unworthy of belonging to the German population. iii Acknowlegements I would like to begin by thanking my dissertation committee Rebecca Wittmann, John Zilcosky, and especially my supervisor, Stefan Soldovieri. I am so very appreciative of your support and guidance throughout this process, and your comments have helped me greatly with this project. You have taught me so much throughout my studies, and you have inspired me greatly in my own teaching. I thank you, Stefan, for your encouragement and assistance! I would also like to thank Markus Stock, John Noyes, and Konrad Eisenbichler for your comments during the defence. Thank you as well to my external, Carol Poore, for your contributions. I also extend my appreciation to the members of the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures at the University of Toronto during these past years for your invaluable support. In addition I thank those on-site who assisted me greatly in completing my research abroad. I am appreciative of those at the memorial centres: Thomas Stöckle (Grafeneck), Boris Böhm (Pirna-Sonnenstein), Irene Leitner (Schloss Hartheim), as well as the artists: Horst Hoheisel, Via Lewandowsky, and Adelheid Niepold, and author: Hans-Ulrich Dapp. Special thanks as well to those in Tübingen who helped me find little known sites, and have exposed me to histories which are still waiting to be uncovered. My gratitude to the institutions who provided me with financial support during my graduate studies. The Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures at the University of Toronto provided me with teaching assistantships and travel grants. The Ontario Graduate Scholarship (Ruth E. and Harry E. Carter Award), University of Toronto Katie Keeler Award (German), and SGS Dissertation Completion Grant allowed me to complete my studies. The Joint Initiative in German and European Studies grant was essential to allow me to conduct research in Germany and Upper Austria. iv I couldn’t have completed this without the support of my family and friends. My colleagues and friends at the University of Toronto have been instrumental in contributing to my success and graduate school experience. I am so grateful to have had such support during completion, and thank my friends and colleagues at the University of New Brunswick, and in the city of Fredericton. I am so lucky to be able to say I have such a wonderful set of friends across Canada, Germany, and abroad who have listened, helped, and pushed me on these past years. I would not have enough pages to thank you all adequately ... So with that I extend a heartfelt “Vielen Dank!” to my friends and family who have supported me during this process. Although I never said it enough, your questioning of “Are we there yet?” was most appreciated and helped me through all phases of this degree. A very special thank you to my parents, Lyle and Ann, and to my sister, Lindsay. Your support and encouragement has meant the world to me. ILYAILY. v Table of Contents Introduction: Lives Worthy of Life and Remembrance: The Forgotten Memorialization of Aktion T4 1 A. (Dis)Ability: The Marginalization of Impairment 3 B. Hippocratic Hypocrisy: Medicine and Aktion T4 10 C. Germans as Victims: Confronting the Taboo 18 D. Lives Worthy of Remembrance 21 Chapter 1: History and Origins of Aktion T4 23 A. The ‘Science’ of Selection 24 B. Lebensunwertes Leben: Eugenics to Mass Murder in Germany 28 C. The Judicial Aftermath of Aktion T4 and Euthanasia Perpetrators 46 D. “The story of racial science no more ends in 1945 than it begins in 1933.” 50 Chapter 2: Topographies of Trauma: Memorialization, Museology and Pedagogy at the Former Sites of Aktion T4 Terror 54 A. Grafeneck 63 i. Memorialization at Grafeneck and Southwest Germany 64 ii. Gedenkstätte Grafeneck: “Ort der Information“ 76 iii. Current Trends in Memorialization: Grafeneck as an “Ort des Lebens” 87 B. Pirna-Sonnenstein 90 i. An Abandoned History: Memorialization at Pirna-Sonnenstein 92 ii. Gedenkstätte Pirna-Sonnenstein: Gegenwart ist Vergangenheit 101 iii. Current Trends in Memorialization at Pirna-Sonnenstein and in the city of Pirna 112 C. Schloss Hartheim 118 i. Memorialization at Hartheim: Ein Zeitzeuge in Vergessenheit 119 ii. Lern- und Gedenkort: History and Social Awareness at Schloss Hartheim today 130 iii. Current Trends in Memorialization in Upper Austria 143 D. From Silence to Structures 145 Chapter 3: “Counter Memories”: Alternative Approaches to the Representation of Aktion T4 and National Socialist Euthanasia in the Mediums of Monuments and Art 151 A. Schandmäler: “There is nothing in this world as invisible as a monument” 152 i. Das Denkmal der grauen Busse 161 ii. »Vergangenheit ist Gegenwart«: The Memorial Signs of Pirna 169 vi iii. Berlin Curves or Berlin Junction? 183 iv. Contemporary Aktion T4 Monuments 188 B. Artistic Renderings of Aktion T4 190 i. Hans Körnig – “In der Straßenbahn“ (1956) 192 ii. Via Lewandowsky – “Sie können nichts schreien hören“ (1989/90) 195 iii. Adelheid Niepold – “Den Toten ohne Begräbnis“ (2003) 203 C. Avoiding Trivializing Memory 207 Chapter 4: From the Schubladen to the Buchladen: A Sustained Silence in Literary Representations of Aktion T4 209 A. From Die Blechtrommel to Kindheitsmuster: Early Examples of Aktion T4 in Literature 214 B. Jugendliterature: An Educational and Direct Approach for the Young Reader 227 i. Ursula Wölfel – Ein Haus für Alle 229 C. Contemporary Literature: Exploiting the Victims in Literature 238 i. Reiner Goss – Grafeneck 238 ii. Hellmut G. Haasis – Heisel Rein der Gscheite Narr 250 D. Memorial Publications: A Private Memory becomes Public 253 i. Hans-Ulrich Dapp – Emma Z: Ein Opfer der Euthanasie 254 E. The Topic of Aktion T4 is coming out of the Drawers 256 Conclusion: The 100€ Question 258 Appendix A: Case Studies 264 Appendix B: Aktion T4 Doctors 268 Bibliography 270 vii Introduction - Lives Worthy of Life and Remembrance: The Forgotten Memorialization of Aktion T4 “What we fear, we often stigmatize and shun and sometimes seek to destroy. Popular entertainments depicting disabled characters allude to these fears and prejudices or address them obliquely or fragmentarily, seeking to reassure us about ourselves.” Paul Longmore qtd. in Barnes and Mercer, 525 “[Dr] Gross wasn’t taken to court because he was a colleague of a lot of people in the system. A colleague of the lawyers. A colleague of the judges. And it’s hard to take a friend or a colleague to court.” Oliver Lehmann, Journalist and Author (Gray Matter) An estimated 70,000 mentally and physically disabled German and Austrian victims lost their lives in the National Socialist euthanasia programmed entitled Aktion T4, and yet a void in memorialization exists for the topic. Deficient memorialization of such a historically important event in German and Austrian society raises questions as to why this Nazi programme was not memorialized to the same degree as other historical events and victim groups of the Holocaust. It is not to say that remembrance of the event was and is currently completely absent from public consciousness, but that it was and is deficient, especially when compared to greater Holocaust memorialization. There are limited examples in literature, in canonical texts such as Günter Grass’ Die Blechtrommel (1959) and Christa Wolf’s Kindheitsmuster (1976), and more recently in popular literature and regionally published novels in Germany.
Recommended publications
  • University of Cincinnati

    University of Cincinnati

    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: August 6th, 2007 I, __________________Julia K. Baker,__________ _____ hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Doctorate of Philosophy in: German Studies It is entitled: The Return of the Child Exile: Re-enactment of Childhood Trauma in Jewish Life-Writing and Documentary Film This work and its defense approved by: Chair: Dr. Katharina Gerstenberger Dr. Sara Friedrichsmeyer Dr. Todd Herzog The Return of the Child Exile: Re-enactment of Childhood Trauma in Jewish Life-Writing and Documentary Film A Dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies University of Cincinnati In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY (Ph.D.) In the Department of German Studies Of the College of Arts and Sciences 2007 by Julia K. Baker M.A., Bowling Green State University, 2000 M.A., Karl Franzens University, Graz, Austria, 1998 Committee Chair: Katharina Gerstenberger ABSTRACT “The Return of the Child Exile: Re-enactment of Childhood Trauma in Jewish Life- Writing and Documentary Film” is a study of the literary responses of writers who were Jewish children in hiding and exile during World War II and of documentary films on the topic of refugee children and children in exile. The goal of this dissertation is to investigate the relationships between trauma, memory, fantasy and narrative in a close reading/viewing of different forms of Jewish life-writing and documentary film by means of a scientifically informed approach to childhood trauma. Chapter 1 discusses the reception of Binjamin Wilkomirski’s Fragments (1994), which was hailed as a paradigmatic traumatic narrative written by a child survivor before it was discovered to be a fictional text based on the author’s invented Jewish life-story.
  • Ulm - Münsingen - Engstingen

    Ulm - Münsingen - Engstingen

    Jahresprogramm 2017 Ulm - Münsingen - Engstingen Vorab- Druck Dezember 2016 Baden-Württemberg SCHWÄBISCHE ALB-BAHN Schneller voran mit Bus und Bahn : Winterprogramm 2013 Nr. 12 . Ausgabe 2/2013 7.+14. Dezember 2013: Gourmet-Express 8. Dezember 2013: Nikolausfahrten Münsingen - Schelklingen 15. Dezember 2013: Nikolausfahrten Engstingen - Gammertingen 21.+22. Dezember 2013: Bratapfelzügle 22.+24. Dezember 2013: Christkindleszügle 12.01. - 02.03.2014: Wintermärchenexpress (Diesel) Der Alb-Bahner. Detaillierte Infos finden Sie in unserem Jahresprogramm Neues rund um die Alb-Bahn und und unter www.bahnhof-muensingen.de 2 Jahresübersicht Mitteilungsblatt des Schwäbischen Alb-Bahn e.V. : Eisenbahn-Chinesisch - hätten Sie’s gewusst? Allgemeine Informationen Fahrplan und Trassen: Jeder Zug, der in Deutschland unterwegs ist, benötigt einen Fahrplan. Der Fahrplan enthält alle wichten Daten über den Zug, neben den Fahrzeiten sind dies auch die Länge, Höchstgeschwindigkeit und das Gewicht des Zuges sowie die Mindestbremshundertstel. Die meisten Regional- und Fernzüge haben hierbei einen festen Jahresfahrplan, der immer von einem zum nächsten Fahrplanwechsel gültig ist. Auch unsere Saisonfahrten undJahresübersicht der 2 Sommerferien-Express verkehren nach festen Plänen. Viele Güterzüge haben ebenfalls einen festen Fahrplan, da sie regelmäßig zu den gleichen Zeiten verkehren. Anders ist es bei unseren Charter- und Sonderfahrten. Sie verkehren oft nur ein einziges Mal zu den jeweiligen Zeiten, brauchen aber ebenso eUnserinen Service für Sie 4+5 (Sonder-)Fahrplan. Denn ähnlich einem Flugzeug, das zum Starten und Landen entsprechende „Slots“ auf dem Flughafen benötigt, braucht ein Zug eine sogenannte Strecke und Fuhrpark 6+7 Allgemeines Fahrplantrasse. Wenn nun also eine Sonderfahrt durchgeführt werden soll, müssen wir bei dem Betreiber der Infrastruktur (Gleise, Weichen, Signale) die ent- sprechende Trasse bestellen und angeben, mit weCharterfahrtenlchem Zug wir wann von A nach B fahren möchten.
  • Hitler's Unwanted Children

    Hitler's Unwanted Children

    1 Hitler's Unwanted Children Sally M. Rogow Half a century old, the Holocaust still mocks the idea of civilization and threatens our sense of ourselves as spiritual creatures. Its undiminished impact on human memory leaves wide open the unsettled and unsettling question of why this should be so. (Langer, 1994 p. 184) The years of disaster have enmeshed all of us in guilt deeply enough, as it is, and the task of the day is to find bridges that will lead us to deeper insight. (Mitscherlich and Mielke, 1947, p.151) Childhood in Nazi Germany was cast in the mythic illusion of a super race. Children who did not meet the social or biological criteria of " perfect" children were removed from their homes and communities, isolated in institutions, hospitals, work and concentration camps, and many thousands were murdered (Aly, 1993; Burleigh, 1994; Friedlander, 1994; Peukert, 1987). It is a myth that only children with severe disabilities were killed or that the killings stopped in 1941; the last child was killed almost a month after the war was over. Unwanted children were orphans, children in care because of emotional or behavior problems, adolescent non-conformists as well as children with physical disabilities or mental handicaps (in addition to Jewish, Gypsy and non-white children). The campaign to remove unwanted children from the community was not only the result of Nazi racial biology and eugenics, it was part and parcel of the effort to impose control and conformity on the entire German population. In a climate of social chaos, economic depression and poverty, the Nazis created an economy of privilege and conflicting spheres of jurisdiction.
  • Compulsory Sterilization, Euthanasia, and Propaganda: the Nazi Experience

    Compulsory Sterilization, Euthanasia, and Propaganda: the Nazi Experience

    COMPULSORY STERILIZATION, EUTHANASIA, AND PROPAGANDA: THE NAZI EXPERIENCE Jay LaMonica I. COMPULSORY STERILIZATION, 1933-1939 When Adolf Hitler took power in Germany, one of his top priorities was to purify the race and to build the genetically pure Aryan man. It was an objective he had discussed in his early manifesto, Mein Kampf. One of the first major laws passed by the Nazi regime in 1934 was the forced sterilization program of those with hereditary illnesses. This program was intended to develop eventually into a full-scale program of euthanasia for those judged “unworthy of life,” especially the mentally and physically disabled. To prepare public opinion in greater Germany, a systematic and widespread propaganda campaign was put into effect to provide the scientific and political rationale for these proposals and to build support among the public at large. The Nazi propaganda program took advantage of a well-developed German film industry that was already being retooled as an instrument of the state in order to maintain and expand backing for the regime. The general pattern of slick, well-produced films utilized repetition of misleading and erroneous scientific information and statistics, coupled with powerful emotional images that confirmed pre-existing prejudices and stereotypes. These techniques were particularly effective when applied to the forced sterilization program and to the euthanasia program that would follow when public opinion was sufficiently prepared. These techniques were also used to inform and indoctrinate those personally involved in carrying out the initiatives and to help maintain their level of commitment. The scientific and medical communities that would implement these programs were already well-disposed to accept their theoretical underpin- nings.
  • Landeszentrale Für Politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg, Director: Lothar Frick 6Th Fully Revised Edition, Stuttgart 2008

    Landeszentrale Für Politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg, Director: Lothar Frick 6Th Fully Revised Edition, Stuttgart 2008

    BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG A Portrait of the German Southwest 6th fully revised edition 2008 Publishing details Reinhold Weber and Iris Häuser (editors): Baden-Württemberg – A Portrait of the German Southwest, published by the Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg, Director: Lothar Frick 6th fully revised edition, Stuttgart 2008. Stafflenbergstraße 38 Co-authors: 70184 Stuttgart Hans-Georg Wehling www.lpb-bw.de Dorothea Urban Please send orders to: Konrad Pflug Fax: +49 (0)711 / 164099-77 Oliver Turecek [email protected] Editorial deadline: 1 July, 2008 Design: Studio für Mediendesign, Rottenburg am Neckar, Many thanks to: www.8421medien.de Printed by: PFITZER Druck und Medien e. K., Renningen, www.pfitzer.de Landesvermessungsamt Title photo: Manfred Grohe, Kirchentellinsfurt Baden-Württemberg Translation: proverb oHG, Stuttgart, www.proverb.de EDITORIAL Baden-Württemberg is an international state – The publication is intended for a broad pub- in many respects: it has mutual political, lic: schoolchildren, trainees and students, em- economic and cultural ties to various regions ployed persons, people involved in society and around the world. Millions of guests visit our politics, visitors and guests to our state – in state every year – schoolchildren, students, short, for anyone interested in Baden-Würt- businessmen, scientists, journalists and numer- temberg looking for concise, reliable informa- ous tourists. A key job of the State Agency for tion on the southwest of Germany. Civic Education (Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg, LpB) is to inform Our thanks go out to everyone who has made people about the history of as well as the poli- a special contribution to ensuring that this tics and society in Baden-Württemberg.
  • Child Euthanasia: Should We Just Not Talk About It?

    Child Euthanasia: Should We Just Not Talk About It?

    Luc Bovens Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it? Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Bovens, Luc (2015) Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it? Journal of Medical Ethics, 41 (8). pp. 630-634. ISSN 0306-6800 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102329 © 2015 British Medical Journal Publishing Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61046/ Available in LSE Research Online: July 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Child Euthanasia: Should we just not talk about it? Luc Bovens, LSE – Department of Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific Method, Houghton Street, London, WC2A2AE, UK, email: [email protected]; Tel: +44- 2079556822. Keywords: Euthanasia, Children, Decision-Making, End-of-Life, Paediatrics Word count: 4877 words Abstract. Belgium has recently extended its euthanasia legislation to minors, making it the first legislation in the world that does not specify any age limit.
  • Running Head: the TRAGEDY of DEPORTATION 1

    Running Head: the TRAGEDY of DEPORTATION 1

    Running head: THE TRAGEDY OF DEPORTATION 1 The Tragedy of Deportation An Analysis of Jewish Survivor Testimony on Holocaust Train Deportations Connor Schonta A Senior Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation in the Honors Program Liberty University Spring 2016 THE TRAGEDY OF DEPORTATION 2 Acceptance of Senior Honors Thesis This Senior Honors Thesis is accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation from the Honors Program of Liberty University. ______________________________ David Snead, Ph.D. Thesis Chair ______________________________ Christopher Smith, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Mark Allen, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ Brenda Ayres, Ph.D. Honors Director ______________________________ Date THE TRAGEDY OF DEPORTATION 3 Abstract Over the course of World War II, trains carried three million Jews to extermination centers. The deportation journey was an integral aspect of the Nazis’ Final Solution and the cause of insufferable torment to Jewish deportees. While on the trains, Jews endured an onslaught of physical and psychological misery. Though most Jews were immediately killed upon arriving at the death camps, a small number were chosen to work, and an even smaller number survived through liberation. The basis of this study comes from the testimonies of those who survived, specifically in regard to their recorded experiences and memories of the deportation journey. This study first provides a brief account of how the Nazi regime moved from methods of emigration and ghettoization to systematic deportation and genocide. Then, the deportation journey will be studied in detail, focusing on three major themes of survivor testimony: the physical conditions, the psychological turmoil, and the chaos of arrival.
  • Operation Reinhard: Death Camps What’S Included

    Operation Reinhard: Death Camps What’S Included

    World War Two Tours Operation Reinhard: Death Camps What’s included: Hotel Bed & Breakfast All transport from the official overseas start point Accompanied for the trip duration All Museum entrances All Expert Talks & Guidance Low Group Numbers “Amazing time, one of those ‘once in a life time trips’. WelI organised, very interesting and thoroughly enjoyable. I would recommend the trip to any enthusiast.” Operation Reinhard (German: Aktion Reinhard or Einsatz Reinhard) was the code name given to the Nazi plan to murder Polish Jews in the General Government, and marked the most deadly phase of the Holocaust, the use of extermination camps. During the operation, as many as two Military History Tours is all about the ‘experience’. Naturally we take million people were murdered in Bełżec, Sobibor and Treblinka, almost all of whom were Jews. care of all local accommodation, transport and entrances but what By 1942, the Nazis had decided to undertake the Final Solution. sets us aside is our on the ground knowledge and contacts, established This led to the establishment of camps such as Bełżec, over many, many years that enable you to really get under the surface of Sobibor and Treblinka which had the express purpose of killing your chosen subject matter. thousands of people quickly and efficiently. These sites differed By guiding guests around these from those such as Auschwitz-Birkenau and Majdanek because historic locations we feel we are contributing greatly towards ‘keeping they also operated as forced-labour camps, these were purely the spirit alive’ of some of the most killing factories. The organizational apparatus behind the memorable events in human history.
  • Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany

    Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany

    Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:18 04 October 2016 Nurses and Midwives in Nazi Germany This book is about the ethics of nursing and midwifery, and how these were abrogated during the Nazi era. Nurses and midwives actively killed their patients, many of whom were disabled children and infants and patients with mental (and other) illnesses or intellectual disabilities. The book gives the facts as well as theoretical perspectives as a lens through which these crimes can be viewed. It also provides a way to teach this history to nursing and midwifery students, and, for the first time, explains the role of one of the world’s most historically prominent midwifery leaders in the Nazi crimes. Downloaded by [New York University] at 03:18 04 October 2016 Susan Benedict is Professor of Nursing, Director of Global Health, and Co- Director of the Campus-Wide Ethics Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center School of Nursing in Houston. Linda Shields is Professor of Nursing—Tropical Health at James Cook Uni- versity, Townsville, Queensland, and Honorary Professor, School of Medi- cine, The University of Queensland. Routledge Studies in Modern European History 1 Facing Fascism 9 The Russian Revolution of 1905 The Conservative Party and the Centenary Perspectives European dictators 1935–1940 Edited by Anthony Heywood and Nick Crowson Jonathan D. Smele 2 French Foreign and Defence 10 Weimar Cities Policy, 1918–1940 The Challenge of Urban The Decline and Fall of a Great Modernity in Germany Power John Bingham Edited by Robert Boyce 11 The Nazi Party and the German 3 Britain and the Problem of Foreign Office International Disarmament Hans-Adolf Jacobsen and Arthur 1919–1934 L.
  • Psychiatry, Genocide and the National Socialist State: Lessons Learnt, Ignored and Forgotten

    Psychiatry, Genocide and the National Socialist State: Lessons Learnt, Ignored and Forgotten

    This is the final peer-reviewed, accepted manuscript of a book chapter published in [Marczac N and Shields K (eds). Genocide Perspectives V] in 2017, available online at https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/books/genocide- perspectives-v Self-archived in the Sydney eScholarship Repository by Sydney Health Ethics (SHE), University of Sydney, Australia Please cite as: Robertson M., Light, E., Lipworth W, Walter, G. 2017. Psychiatry, genocide and the National Socialist State: lessons learnt, ignored and forgotten. In Marczac N and Shields K (eds). Genocide Perspectives V. pp69-89. Australia: UTS ePRESS. Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derivatives License CC BY-NC-ND http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Psychiatry, genocide and the National Socialist State: lessons learnt, ignored and forgotten Robertson M., Light, E., Lipworth W, Walter, G. 2017 Authors: Associate Professor Michael Robertson, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, [email protected] Dr Edwina Light, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, [email protected] Dr Wendy Lipworth, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, [email protected] Professor Garry Walter, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, [email protected] Introduction The genocide of European Jews perpetrated by the National Socialist (Nazi) regime in Germany and its satellites was a distinctly modern event. The bureaucratised and industrialised nature of the Nazi plan (the Endlösung or Final Solution) is generally considered the defining characteristic of the Nazi regime’s genocide.
  • Memorialization of the National Socialist Aktion T4 Euthanasia Programme

    Memorialization of the National Socialist Aktion T4 Euthanasia Programme

    Lives Worthy of Life and Remembrance: Memorialization of the National Socialist Aktion T4 Euthanasia Programme by Meaghan Ann Hepburn A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures University of Toronto © Copyright by Meaghan Ann Hepburn 2014 Meaghan Ann Hepburn Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (2014) Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures University of Toronto “Lives Worthy of Life and Remembrance: Memorialization of the National Socialist Aktion T4 Euthanasia Programme Abstract It is estimated that over 70,000 German and Austrian victims deemed mentally and physically disabled by the Nazis lost their lives in the National Socialist euthanasia programmed entitled Aktion T4. These murders prove to be the first instance of mass gassings of a selection of society deemed unwanted, and provided the intellectual and technological framework that was employed in the Extermination Camps. And yet a void in memorialization exists for the topic. Deficient memorialization of such a historically important event in German and Austrian society raises questions as to why this Nazi programme was not memorialized to the same degree as other historical events and victim groups of the Holocaust. The scarce number of representations of the victims in the forms of literature, art, monuments and memorials is indicative of a reluctance or selective remembering of the topic in WWII memorialization practices. The void in memorialization of Aktion T4 is founded in three important and influential factors. Firstly, the negative stigmas associated with mental and physical disabilities, both in confronting the topic, but also presenting it on public display.
  • Eugenics, Euthanasia and Genocide Kenneth L

    Eugenics, Euthanasia and Genocide Kenneth L

    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 59 | Number 3 Article 6 August 1992 Eugenics, Euthanasia and Genocide Kenneth L. Garver Bettylee Garver Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Garver, Kenneth L. and Garver, Bettylee (1992) "Eugenics, Euthanasia and Genocide," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 59: No. 3, Article 6. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol59/iss3/6 Eugenics, Euthanasia and Genocide by Kenneth L. Garver Department of Medical Genetics, West Penn Hospital Pittsburgh, PA and Bettylee Garver Director, Genetic Counseling Program Department of Human Genetics Graduate School of Public Health University of Pittsburgh Introduction As physicians or health care providers we should be concerned with the history of eugenics. However, as George Wilhelm Hegel has commented, "What experience and history teach is this - that people and governments never have learned anything from history, or acted on principles deducted from it" (The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations 195, p. 240).' If this is so, and certainly it appears to be, with the strong emergence of public attitudes regarding "The Right to Die," then we have a duty as physicians to guide the public toward a commitment for the sanctity of life. The distinction should be made between genetics and eugenics. Genetics is a legitimate scientific study of heredity. Eugenic comes from the Greek word, eugenes (eu-well and genos-born). The term refers to improving the race by the bearing of healthy offspring. Eugenics is the science that deals with all influences that improve the inborn quality of the human race, particularly through the control of hereditary factors.