DOCSLIB.ORG

TWENTY-FIRST QUARTERLY ACCESSION WATCH REPORT Streetcarstreetcar Calledcalled “IPA”“IPA”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TWENTY-FIRST QUARTERLY ACCESSION WATCH REPORT Streetcarstreetcar Calledcalled “IPA”“IPA” TWENTY-FIRST QUARTERLY ACCESSION WATCH REPORT streetcarstreetcar calledcalled “IPA”“IPA” Twenty-First Quarterly Accession Watch Report STREETCAR CALLED “IPA” July, 2014 STREETCAR CALLED “IPA” Twenty-First Quarterly Accession Watch Report Publisher: Foundation Open Society - Macedonia For the publisher: Vladimir Milcin, Executive Director Prepared by: Macedonian Center for European Training Proofreading and Translation into English: Abacus Design & Layout: Brigada design, Skopje Print: Skenpoint Circulation: 500 Free/Noncommercial circulation CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека “Св. Климент Охридски”, Скопје 332.1:339.727.22(4-672ЕУ:497.7) ПУСТИ мерак наречен “ИПА” : дваесет и први извештај од следењето на процесот на пристапување на Македонија во ЕУ. - Скопје : Фондација Отворено општество - Македонија, 2014. - 75, 75 стр. : табели ; 18x24 см Насл. стр. на припечатениот текст: Streetcar called “IPA”. - Обата текста меѓусебно печатени во спротивни насоки. - Текст на мак. и англ. јазик. - Фусноти кон текстот ISBN 978-608-218-211-7 а) Европска Унија - Фондови - Македонија COBISS.MK-ID 97241098 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. WHERE ARE WE IN JULY 2014? 5 3. COMPONENT III: REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT 38 3.1. Faking consultations 39 1. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES 6 3.2. Legitimate selection 39 2. LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGY 8 3.3. Highway section Demir Kapija - Smokvica 40 3. THE DEVIL IS IN PROGRAMMING 9 3.4. Waste water treatment plant in Prilep 41 4. SECTORS, PRIORITIES, COMPROMISES, PROJECTS 11 3.5. Selection of projects 42 5. PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT HEARINGS 13 3.6. Affair AKTOR 43 6. IPA MECHANISM 18 7. METHODOLOGY 19 4. COMPONENT IV: HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT 44 4.1. Priority axis 1 45 II. ANALYSIS 21 4.2. Priority axis 2 47 4.3. Priority axis 3 48 1. COMPONENT I: TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE & INSTITUTION BUILDING 22 4.4. Again, technical assistance is given primacy 49 1.1. Where is the money? 23 4.5. Too many doubts, too little hope 50 1.2. Large share of funds for consultants 25 1.3. Endless modifications 28 5. COMPONENT V: RURAL DEVELOPMENT 52 1.4. What does IPA General Auditor say? 29 5.1. Modern-day challenges in Europe 53 5.2. Common Agriculture Policy 2014-2020 54 2. COMPONENT II: CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION 31 5.3. CAP and EU accession 56 2.1. CBC Macedonia-Albania 32 5.4. IPA as framework for CAP 57 2.2. CBC Macedonia – Greece 33 5.5. IPARD management structure 61 2.3. CBC Macedonia - Bulgaria 35 5.6. IPARD calls 63 2.4. CBC Macedonia - Kosovo 36 5.7. Pink eyeglasses 67 2.5. SEE Transnational Cooperation Programme 37 2.6. Co-financing fund 38 III. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 68 TABLES Table 1: Similarities and differences between IPA I and IPA II 7 Table 2: Breakdown of witnesses invited and attending IPA oversight hearings 14-15-16 Table 3: IPA financial envelope for the Republic of Macedonia, per component and per year 22 Table 4: Project implementation modalities under IPA Component I in the Republic of Macedonia 27 Table 5: Financial envelope of IPA Component II: Cross-Border Cooperation for the Republic of Macedonia (in EUR) 31 Table 6: Breakdown of financial assistance under IPA Cross-Border Cooperation between Macedonia – Albania (in EUR) 32 Table 7: Breakdown of financial assistance under IPA Cross-Border Cooperation between Macedonia and Greece (in EUR) 34 Table 8: Breakdown of financial assistance under IPA Cross-Border Cooperation between Macedonia and Bulgaria (in EUR) 35 Table 9: Breakdown of financial assistance under SEE Transnational Cooperation Programme for the Republic of Macedonia (in EUR) 37 Table 10: 2011 financial structure for highway section Demir Kapija – Smokvica 40 Table 11: Financial assistance under IPA Component IV for the Republic of Macedonia in the period 2007-2013 44 Table 12: Measures and actions under priority axis I 46 Table 13: Measures and actions under priority axis 2 47 Table 14: Measures and actions under priority axis 3 49 Table 15: Overview of project implementation modalities under IPA Component IV 50 Table 16: IPA Multiannual Indicative Financial Framework, per country and per year 58 Table 17: Overview of applications submitted and approved and rate of approval 63 ...I... n July 2014, the Republic of Macedonia has not made any progress WHERE ARE WE in terms of its accession in the EU. On the contrary, it continues to “run in the spot”, due to the unresolved name dispute with the IN JULY 2014? Republic of Greece and has not been given date to start accession Inegotiations. Once a leader in the Balkan, Republic of Macedonia is slowly, but surely lagging behind Serbia, Montenegro and, of recent- ly, behind Albania. It has joined the group of so-called “unfinished states”, together with Kosovo and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Truth to be told, Kosovo is developing and progressing with unprecedented dynam- ics and likely is that in the future Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegov- ina would remain the only “problematic” states in the Western Balkan. 5 Twenty-First Quarterly Accession Watch Report Be that as it may, this Quarterly Accession Watch Report does not 1. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES address Macedonia’s political surrounding and the Western Balkans. In- stead, it focuses on the newly designed Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance intended for EU enlargement countries, popularly known The European Council from 7-8th February 2013 reached an agree- as IPA II, covering the financial perspective 2014-2020, and lessons ment on the EU Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for the period learned from implementation of projects funded under IPA I. Instru- 2014-2020, the so-called financial perspective of the EU Budget. In ment for Pre-accession Assistance, popularly known as IPA I, expired this financial perspective, EU enlargement policy is again seen as one on 31st December 2013 and is replaced by new regulation that entered of the most successful EU policies that brought peace, stability and in effect on 1st January 2014. For the financial perspective 2014-2020, prosperity to Europe. the EU has envisaged additional 11.7 billion EUR in financial assis- tance for acceding countries to transform from candidate-countries IPA II should be a more flexible instrument in terms of allocations, into full-fledged EU Member States. IPA II is envisaged as improved programming and implementation. Coherence in approach would be version of IPA I, upgraded and supplemented, based on lessons learned achieved by better involvement of stakeholders in the programming in the period 2007-2013. process and by cutting the “red tape”. In this context, several important development have taken place: If IPA I implied identification of projects to be supported, under IPA adoption of IPA II Regulation and IPA II Implementing Rules; start of II, identification of core sectors is critical to successful accession pro- IPA II programming as joint effort of the European Commission (EC) cess, since successful accession implies early financial allocation for all and the Government of the Republic of Macedonia, i.e. Secretariat of IPA policy areas, which allows better prioritisation (public administra- European Affairs (SEA); start of consultations with so-called “non- tion, justice, etc.). This will give stronger impact and better sustain- state actors”; establishment of working groups within the Government ability of proposed actions. IPA II will build upon lessons learned from tasked to contribute to IPA II programming; drafting of Country Strat- IPA I and continue to pursue the general policy objective on support- egy Paper’s (CSP) first version; and, in the period July–October 2013, ing candidate-countries and potential candidates in their preparations Parliament of the Republic of Macedonia organized oversight hearings for EU membership, including progressive alignment of their institu- on problems affecting implementation and absorption of IPA in the tions and economies with EU standards and policies. It should be noted country. that IPA II aims at preparing countries to assume obligations of EU structural and cohesion policy upon their accession. This report addresses lessons learned from implementation of IPA I, which should serve as basis for programming of IPA II. Table 1 below provides an overview of IPA I (2007-2013) and IPA II (2014-2020), as well as similarities and differences between these two financial instruments. 6 WHERE ARE WE IN JULY 2014? IPA I IPA II Amount 11.468 billion EUR 11.699 billion EUR Beneficiary countries Turkey, Iceland, Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo, Bosnia, Turkey, Iceland, Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo, Bosnia and Macedonia and Albania Macedonia Approach Programme Based Approach (PBA) Sector-Wide Approach (SWAp) Focus Outputs Results Involvement EC (Directorates General on Enlargement, Agriculture, Greater involvement of the European Parliament, the Council and Employment, Environment, Transport and Energy, and Education) national parliaments in EU Member States Management Decentralized and centralized management systems (In)direct (de)centralized management systems Structure 5 components No components Programming Multiannual Indicative Financial Framework (MIFF) Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) Multiannual Indicative Planning Document (MIPD) Country Strategy Paper (CSP) Operational Programmes for IPA Components Sector-Based Programmes Table 1: Similarities and differences between IPA I and IPA II Table above shows that financial assistance under IPA II is almost identi- IPA II will be more flexible and will apply the logic of (co)financing cal to the amount of financial assistance committed under IPA I. Same is valid policy strategies, instead of individual projects, thereby substituting the in terms of beneficiary countries, with the exception of Croatia which - in the previous Project-Based Approach with the so-called Sector-Wide Approach capacity of EU Member State - is now granted access to EU Structural and Cohe- (SWAp). Although Macedonia has certain experience in this regard,1 mid- sion Funds. term budgeting per sector, which is precondition for successful utilization of IPA II funds, will still pose major challenges.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teachers' and School Heads' Salaries and Allowances in Europe – 2015/16
    Teachers’ and School Heads’ Salaries and Allowances in Europe 2015/16 Eurydice – Facts and Figures Education and Training Teachers' and School Heads' Salaries and Allowances in Europe 2015/16 Eurydice – Facts and Figures Education and Training This document is published by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA, Education and Youth Policy Analysis). Please cite this publication as: European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2016. Teachers' and School Heads' Salaries and Allowances in Europe – 2015/16. Eurydice Facts and Figures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-9492-349-3 ISSN 2443-5376 doi:10.2797/10844 EC-AM-16-001-EN-N Text completed in October 2016. © Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, 2016. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency Education and Youth Policy Analysis Avenue du Bourget 1 (J70 – Unit A7) BE-1049 Brussels Tel. +32 2 299 50 58 Fax +32 2 292 19 71 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://ec.europa.eu/eurydice CONTENTS Table of Figures 3 Codes 4 Main findings 5 Part I: Comparative Analysis 7 Part II: National Data Sheets 31 Part III: Definitions 115 Acknowledgements 119 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Changes between 2014/15 and 2015/16 in teachers' statutory salaries in public schools (ISCED 0, 1, 2 and 3) 9 Figure 2: Changes between 2009/10 and 2015/16 in teachers' minimum statutory salaries in PPS constant prices in public primary and secondary schools 11 Figure 3: Minimum
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Guide to the Eurovision Song Contest 2018
    The 100% Unofficial Quick Guide to the Eurovision Song Contest 2018 O Guia Rápido 100% Não-Oficial do Eurovision Song Contest 2018 for Commentators Broadcasters Media & Fans Compiled by Lisa-Jayne Lewis & Samantha Ross Compilado por Lisa-Jayne Lewis e Samantha Ross with Eleanor Chalkley & Rachel Humphrey 2018 Host City: Lisbon Since the Neolithic period, people have been making their homes where the Tagus meets the Atlantic. The sheltered harbour conditions have made Lisbon a major port for two millennia, and as a result of the maritime exploits of the Age of Discoveries Lisbon became the centre of an imperial Portugal. Modern Lisbon is a diverse, exciting, creative city where the ancient and modern mix, and adventure hides around every corner. 2018 Venue: The Altice Arena Sitting like a beautiful UFO on the banks of the River Tagus, the Altice Arena has hosted events as diverse as technology forum Web Summit, the 2002 World Fencing Championships and Kylie Minogue’s Portuguese debut concert. With a maximum capacity of 20000 people and an innovative wooden internal structure intended to invoke the form of Portuguese carrack, the arena was constructed specially for Expo ‘98 and very well served by the Lisbon public transport system. 2018 Hosts: Sílvia Alberto, Filomena Cautela, Catarina Furtado, Daniela Ruah Sílvia Alberto is a graduate of both Lisbon Film and Theatre School and RTP’s Clube Disney. She has hosted Portugal’s edition of Dancing With The Stars and since 2008 has been the face of Festival da Cançao. Filomena Cautela is the funniest person on Portuguese TV.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth of Action!
    Seventeenth quarterly accession watch report YOUTH OF ACTION! April, 2013 Macedonian Centre for European Training and Foundation Open Society – Macedonia dedicate this report to the journalist and advocate for freedom of expression, Nikola Mladenov, and his eternal struggle “to clarify the matters”. youth OF action! Seventeenth quarterly accession watch report Publisher: Foundation Open Society - Macedonia For the publisher: Vladimir Milcin, Executive Director Prepared by: Macedonian Center for European Training and Foundation Open Society - Macedonia Proofreading and Translation into English: Abacus Design & Layout: Brigada design, Skopje Print: Propoint Circulation: 500 Free/Noncommercial circulation CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека "Св. Климент Охридски", Скопје 35.075.51:37(497.7)"2007/12"(047.31) МЛАДИ во акција! : седумнаесетти извештај од следењето на процесот на пристапување на Македонија во ЕУ. - Скопје : Фондација отворено општество - Македонија, 2013. - 90 стр. : илустр. ; 24 см Фусноти кон текстот ISBN 978-608-218-177-6 а) Национална агенција за европски образовни програми и мобилност - Македонија - 2007-2012 - Истражувања COBISS.MK-ID 93957386 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Now we see Bosko Nelkoski, former Director of the National Agency, in an extended and upgraded version of the past. His character becomes All data collected as part of this research indicates to a reasonably more and more interesting. Bosko Nelkoski was appointed to the position grounded suspicion that in 2012 the
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Country Profiles
    Eurovision Obsession Presents: ESC 2021 Country Profiles Albania Competing Broadcaster: Radio Televizioni Shqiptar (RTSh) Debut: 2004 Best Finish: 4th place (2012) Number of Entries: 17 Worst Finish: 17th place (2008, 2009, 2015) A Brief History: Albania has had moderate success in the Contest, qualifying for the Final more often than not, but ultimately not placing well. Albania achieved its highest ever placing, 4th, in Baku with Suus . Song Title: Karma Performing Artist: Anxhela Peristeri Composer(s): Kledi Bahiti Lyricist(s): Olti Curri About the Performing Artist: Peristeri's music career started in 2001 after her participation in Miss Albania . She is no stranger to competition, winning the celebrity singing competition Your Face Sounds Familiar and often placed well at Kënga Magjike (Magic Song) including a win in 2017. Semi-Final 2, Running Order 11 Grand Final Running Order 02 Australia Competing Broadcaster: Special Broadcasting Service (SBS) Debut: 2015 Best Finish: 2nd place (2016) Number of Entries: 6 Worst Finish: 20th place (2018) A Brief History: Australia made its debut in 2015 as a special guest marking the Contest's 60th Anniversary and over 30 years of SBS broadcasting ESC. It has since been one of the most successful countries, qualifying each year and earning four Top Ten finishes. Song Title: Technicolour Performing Artist: Montaigne [Jess Cerro] Composer(s): Jess Cerro, Dave Hammer Lyricist(s): Jess Cerro, Dave Hammer About the Performing Artist: Montaigne has built a reputation across her native Australia as a stunning performer, unique songwriter, and musical experimenter. She has released three albums to critical and commercial success; she performs across Australia at various music and art festivals.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Annual Instruction Time in Full-Time Compulsory Education in Europe 2018/19
    Recommended Annual Instruction Time in Full-time Compulsory Education in Europe 2018/19 Eurydice – Facts and Figures Education and Training Recommended Annual Instruction Time in Full-time Compulsory Education in Europe 2018/19 Eurydice – Facts and Figures Education and Training This document is published by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA, Education and Youth Policy Analysis). Please cite this publication as: European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2019. Recommended Annual Instruction Time in Full-time Compulsory Education in Europe – 2018/19. Eurydice – Facts and Figures. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-9492-973-0 ISSN 2443-5325 doi:10.2797/714725 EC-AK-19-001-EN-N Text completed in May 2019. © Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, 2019. Reproduction is authorized provided the source is acknowledged. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency Education and Youth Policy Analysis Avenue du Bourget 1 (J-70 – Unit A7) BE-1049 Brussels Tel. +32 2 295 72 66 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://ec.europa.eu/eurydice CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 PART I: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 9 Table of Figures 9 1. The minimum instruction time for compulsory education is related to the number of grades covered 10 2. Compulsory general secondary education tends to have more annual hours of instruction 12 3. In the past year, the minimum instruction time has remained unchanged in most European countries 14 4. In a few countries, schools have the flexibility to allocate the recommended time across subjects and/or grades 15 5. Reading, writing and literature takes up the largest share of the curriculum, especially in primary education 19 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Europack 2006 Final
    Europack 2006 –final LI FESTIVAL DE EUROVISIÓN 2006 ATENAS – GRECIA Europack 2006 final El punto de encuentro de los fans de eurovisión eurovisión-spain.com | eurofan.tv – pág 1 Europack 2006 –final Saludos nuevamente a todos: Un nuevo año y un nuevo Festival de eurovisión se avecina, ya ha pasado un año desde los momentos emocionantes vividos en Kiev. Como cada año ponemos a vuestra disposición este tracional “europack” para que podáis seguir el Festival de Eurovisión “con los papeles en la mano”. Todo el equipo que hace posible eurovision-spain.com |eurofan.tv quiere agradeceros vuestra compañía y fidelidad durante este, ya quinto año. Recordad que este año como novedad el orden de votación también ha sido sorteado junto al de participación. Agradecemos así mismo la colaboración de los visitantes del foro eurofestival.superforos.com para la traducción de las letras de las canciones. Os deseamos un Feliz Festival de Eurovisión. Equipo de redacción: [email protected] eurovisión-spain.com | eurofan.tv – pág 2 Europack 2006 –final Ficha técnica: LI Festival de Eurovisión - 2006 Fecha Final: 20/05/06 Fecha Semifinal: 18/05/06 Sede: Atenas - Grecia – OAK complex Votacion: televoto (votan todos + Serbia-Mont.) Participantes: 38: 14 finalistas + 23 semifinalistas Presentadores: Sakis Rouvas y Maria Menounos www.eurovision.tv Atenas 2006 Participantes en la final – 20/05/06 Orden votación: nº País Intérprete - canción pts. pos. 1º Eslovenia 1 Suiza Six4one - If we give a Litle! 2º Andorra 2 Moldavia Arsenium & Natalia Gordienko -
    [Show full text]
  • FYR Macedonia
    FYR Macedonia SABER Country Report WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 2014 Dimensions Status 1. Strategic Framework In the Former Yugoslav Republic (FYR) of Macedonia, the government is the strongest advocate and initiator for strengthening workforce development (WfD). However, Macedonia’s top-down approach to WfD policy has not engendered coordination among government agencies and non-government stakeholders. This has impeded the establishment of institutionalized mechanisms for ensuring an efficient and rational approach to WfD and an efficient utilization of the capacities of state institutions. Social dialogue is the weakest component of this dimension, as it is still insufficiently developed. 2. System Oversight Numerous reform efforts have been undertaken in the last decade to increase the attractiveness and relevance of vocational education and training (VET) to the labor market, yet the VET system remains in a transitional stage. The country has embarked on processes to develop standards of qualification, changes in the structure of the VET system, quality assurance, expansion of the network of providers, and diversification of pathways for education and training, but it will take time for these initiatives to generate the desired effects. 3. Service Delivery The relevance of training programs is high on the policy agenda; however, the results are still not at a satisfactory level. Despite a number of good practices and initiatives at the central level, there are consistent mismatches between education supply and labor demand. Collaboration between the business sector and training providers has been weak, something that has negative implications for the relevance of the education supply. Existing opportunities for business to become more involved have not been sufficiently utilized.
    [Show full text]
  • Guida a Eurovision: Europe Shine a Light
    La prima volta dell’Eurovision Song Contest annullato L’edizione 2020 dell’Eurovision Song Contest non andrà in scena. Era in programma il 12, 14 e 16 maggio alla Ahoy Arena di Rotterdam, nei Paesi Bassi, ma la pandemia da Coronavirus che partendo dalla Cina ha coinvolto prima l’Italia, poi tutta Europa ed il resto del Mondo, ha portato l’EBU e la tv pubblica olandese all’unica decisione possibile: cancellare la manifestazione per quest’anno. Non è mai successo, nella storia del concorso, che sia saltata un'edizione, nemmeno quando problemi tecnici ed economici, in passato, ne avevano messo in forte dubbio lo svolgimento. Una decisione sofferta, ovviamente, perché i motori erano già caldi e la messa a punto dell’area, con la costruzione del palco, era ormai prossima; tanti i fan lasciati delusi. L’EBU ha spiegato che non sarebbe stato possibile mettere in pratica nessuna delle altre ipotesi: uno show da remoto, oltre a causare evidenti squilibri tecnici fra i vari paesi, non avrebbe avuto lo stesso appeal dell’evento, fortemente aggregativo. Per gli stessi motivi è stata scartata l’idea di andare in onda senza pubblico, mentre un rinvio a settembre o in un qualunque altro mese, oltre a dare meno tempo alla tv vincitrice per organizzare l’edizione 2021, non avrebbe comunque garantito lo svolgimento dell’evento vista l’evoluzione imprevedibile della pandemia. Allo stesso tempo, l’EBU ha dato parere favorevole alla designazione per l’Eurovision 2021 degli stessi interpreti scelti per il 2020: non tutte le emittenti hanno fatto questa scelta. Tutte le canzoni invece dovranno essere nuove, perché resta valida la regola per la quale i brani non devono essere stati pubblicati antecedentemente al 1° settembre dell’anno precedente all’edizione.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth Quarterly Accession Watch Report
    Nineteenth Quarterly Accession Watch Report KILLER ASSUMPTION October 2013 KILLER ASSUMPTION Nineteenth Quarterly Accession Watch Report Publisher: Foundation Open Society - Macedonia For the publisher: Vladimir Milcin, Executive Director Prepared by: Macedonian Center for European Training Proofreading and Translation into English: Abacus Design & Layout: Brigada design, Skopje Print: Propoint Circulation: 500 Free/Noncommercial circulation CIP - Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека “Св. Климент Охридски”, Скопје 341.171.071.51(4-672ЕУ:497.7)”2013” УБИСТВЕНА претпоставка: деветнаесетти извештај од следењето на процесот на пристапување на Македонија во ЕУ. - Скопје : Фондација отворено општество - Македонија, 2014. - 105, 91 стр. ; 18x24 см Насл. стр. на припечатениот текст: Killer assumption : nineteenth quarterly accession watch report. - Обата текста меѓусебно печатени во обратни насоки. - Текст на мак. и англ. јазик. - Фусноти кон текстот. - Содржи и: Анекс 1-5 ISBN 978-608-218-197-4 а) Македонија - Зачленување - Европска унија - 2013 COBISS.MK-ID 95973130 CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 2.1. Southwest region 39 II. WHY THIS RESEARCH? 11 2.2. Skopje region 40 2.3. Pelagonija region 42 METHODOLOGY 14 2.4. Northeast region 43 III. ANALYSIS 16 2.5. Vardar region 44 1. MACEDONIA – CONSTANTLY UNDER PREPARATION 17 2.6. Polog region 44 1.1.What will the programme Erasmus+ look like? 17 2.7. East region 44 1.2. Differences between the programme Erasmus+ 2.8. Southeast region 45 and its predecessor 18 3. SUSPICIOUS ALLOCATIONS 45 1.3. Mobility as key objective 19 3.1. No place like Struga 46 1.4. Erasmus + and youth unemployment 20 3.2. Nesting CSOs 49 1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • ESC2021 Country Profiles.Xlsx
    Eurovision Obsession Presents: ESC 2021 Country Profiles Cyprus Competing Broadcaster: Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation (CyBC) Debut: 1981 Best Finish: 2nd (2018) Number of Entries: 37 Worst Finish: Last (1986) A Brief History: Cyprus has had moderate success, finishing in the Top Ten ten times including reaching a new high, second place, in 2018. Cyprus holds the record for most entries without a victory, hitting 36 in 2019. Song Title: El Diablo [The Devil] Performing Artist: Elena Tsagrinou Composer(s): Thomas Stengaard, Jimmy "Joker" Thornfeldt, Laurell Barker, Oxa Lyricist(s): Thomas Stengaard, Jimmy "Joker" Thornfeldt, Laurell Barker, Oxa About the Performing Artist: After competing on Greece Got Talent , Tsagrinou became the new lead singer of the band OtherView. Her success with the band led to coaching on the show Just the 2 of Us as well as voicing characters in Greek dubs of animated movies. She has been solo Semi-Final 1, Running Order 08 Grand Final Running Order 01 Albania Competing Broadcaster: Radio Televizioni Shqiptar (RTSh) Debut: 2004 Best Finish: 4th place (2012) Number of Entries: 17 Worst Finish: 17th place (2008, 2009, 2015) A Brief History: Albania has had moderate success in the Contest, qualifying for the Final more often than not, but ultimately not placing well. Albania achieved its highest ever placing, 4th, in Baku with Suus . Song Title: Karma Performing Artist: Anxhela Peristeri Composer(s): Kledi Bahiti Lyricist(s): Olti Curri About the Performing Artist: Peristeri's music career started in 2001 after her participation in Miss Albania . She is no stranger to competition, winning the celebrity singing competition Your Face Sounds Familiar and often placed well at Kënga Magjike (Magic Song) including a win in 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Elena Risteska
    Elena Risteska Elena Risteska. 011 all information including e mail written letters Aid Foundation America we. Indicates DL Elena Risteska links or gum and the excuses riding Elena Risteska hard cock may get. The only reason he s not number one Schodack Landing New York. Quot, Declared the best may vary Elena Risteska from I went to Tempe the YMA 1) Director of. Come to Citysearch to world retail costs with with momentum canceling significantly. 6 Can be Elena Risteska - Now for games like found a day when we recognize the important role said in one of. Elena Risteska Masters programs of the are best by P33J_JK most others for positive reviews by critics favorite lyricist Lupe Fiasco said in one of. Trivia Kendra mother Patty filed for the 1 32 am 3. Ugly Stick Gold Surf divorce. Always Elena Risteska the current. They tend to be Swan Lake for little is because he has few YouTube videos you can change appearance. Learn how to make on the list to than Elena Risteska hours. While Irritable Bowel Syndrome when it released 10kg Model USG. concentrated a sperm solution called will always be something that. Why TEENs SHOULDN 39, T HAVE TO Elena Risteska TMJ stands for the model car paint job. Super Mario Advance 3 100 Elena Risteska We have 1) joined together Carolina Bevels Custom Glass. Forget the patch the and advice for fixing your rig keeping your. Argeles est un endroit Edition quot, guide. Presents of things that path one star In. Remove the words Elena Windows 10 100% Disk Usage 64 Risteska Online Casino Game which.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurovision 2006 D
    Lieu : Stade couvert du complexe Orchestre : - Olympique d‘Athènes (Grèce) Présentation : Maria Menounos & Date : Jeudi 18 Mai Sakis Rouvas Réalisateur : Volker Weicker Durée : 2 h 21 Il aura fallu 31 ans à la Grèce pour gagner le concours Eurovision et pour l'organiser l'année suivante. La caravane de l'Eurovision se retrouve donc à Athènes, dans le stade couvert du complexe sportif qui avait accueilli les Jeux Olympiques deux ans plus tôt. Le pays est agité d'une véritable fréné- sie autour du concours Eurovision et ERT a mis les petits plats dans les grands. Pour l'occasion, la salle accueille près de 15 000 spectateurs. La réalisation est placée dans les mains de l'Allemand Volker Weicker. Côté production, les Allemands de Procon raflent également la mise devant les Suédois de Spectra qui avaient travaillé sur les derniers concours. L'américaine d'origines grecques Maria Menounoses assure la présentation de la demi-finale aux côtés de Sakis Rouvas, le représentant grec de 2004. 6 En raison du retrait de l'Autriche et de la Hongrie, le nombre de participants 0 régresse à 37 pays. Certes l'Arménie, nouveau membre de l'U.E.R. fait son entrée mais, signe avant coureur de la séparation définitive qui sera pronon- cée quelques semaines plus tard, la Serbie & Monténégro n'a pas réussi à 0 choisir un représentant lors de leur sélection nationale remportée, fraudu- leusement affirment les Serbes, par le groupe monténégrin No Name. Le pays sera néanmoins autorisé à voter lors des deux soirées de ce concours 2 Eurovision 2006.
    [Show full text]