DOCSLIB.ORG

Thames Tideway Tunnel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thames Tideway Tunnel ISSUE 07 | January 2015 FEATURE Contractors top the risk register page 24 PROFILE INTERVIEW Mace at 25 – ACE’s new what’s next? chairman John page 18 Turzynski page 32 Produced for the industry by the Association for Consultancy and Engineering Thames Tideway Tunnel The capital’s next big adventure page 10 MESSAGE FROM THE EDITOR News roundup As described in the pages of Infrastructure Intelligence this month, the prospects for a busy 2015 across the built environment are looking very at Sellafield and put the good indeed. RAIL Nuclear Decommissioning Despite the obvious political uncertainty thrown up by a General Authority in direct charge Election, continued investment in infrastructure is clearly locked into all Failure of new but untested was the result of “technical major party plans as a robust strategy for vital economic growth. plant and equipment uncertainties that made the Yet as we look forward to projects such as Thames Tideway Tunnel, used by Network Rail and transfer of responsibility Crossrail 2, High Speed 2 and new airport capacity making headway in contractor Amey Rail during unsuitable”. The move follows 2015, it remains impossible to ignore the constant challenge to progress renewal work at Holloway intense criticism of the private that still besets the UK infrastructure planning system. Junction north of King’s sector arrangement with NMP Certainly the system has moved forward in the 20 years since a four Cross Station has been which is made up of AECOM, year public inquiry scarred Heathrow Terminal 5. But a quick look at identified as a central cause AMEC and Areva by the Public of rail chaos witnessed in Accounts Committee (PAC) the work currently underway to winapproval for HS2, is still going on the capital over Christmas. and the National Audit Office. to clear Thames Tideway Tunnels for a start and that is about to start on Network Rail’s report into Crossrail 2 and you clearly see that the UK is far from an easy place to the reasons why hundreds A joint venture of Atkins, invest in infrastructure . of thousands of passengers Mace and Areva has And let’s not get started on the Davies Commission, and its ability to were left stranded on 27 Michele Dix becomes Transport for London’s project chief formally signed the £1.72bn Produced for the industry by the Association finally decide where to build new runways in the south east. December has also identified executive for Crossrail 2 in February. She was formerly contract for the silos direct for Consultancy and Engineering It is, of course, unlikely that solutions to our planning problems will insufficient contingency in managing director for planning and was awarded CBE in the encapsulation plant project feature as politicians jostle for votes in the four months leading to the the project plan for this work Queen’s New Year honours for services to the industry. Four at Sellafield. The AMA joint Infrastructure Intelligence Election. However, giventhat infrastructure is critical to all party plans, and insufficient planning to design teams have also been appointed to make the case for venture was selected as 12 Caxton St, London SW1H 0QL it must remain central to thinking as a new government is formed. ensure that alternative routes project funding. The winning bidders and project areas are: preferred bidder in April 2014. T: 020 7222 6557 Labour’s Armitt Review has already proposed an infrastructure for passengers could cope. ARCADIS Hyder (in partnership with Weston Williamson, The silos direct encapsulation www.infrastructure-intelligence.com Problems at Paddington were Vinci Construction, Interfleet and First Class Partnerships and plant project involves planning commission to embed long term thinking into the short blamed on the Balfour Beatty/ Dr Sauer & Partners) – engineering/technical aspects; CH2M processing intermediate level Editor: Antony Oliver, term political cycle. Now writing in this month’s magazine, former 07710 341082, Alstom Signalling Solutions Hill/Atkins (CAST) – strategic modelling, route development, waste recovered from one [email protected] Tory minister Stephen Hammond sets out plans for a Department for joint venture. It took ten planning, appraisal and evaluation; MTEW (Mott MacDonald of the oldest nuclear waste Infrastructure to provide similar long term investment focus. hours to complete the planned Ltd, Temple Group Ltd, ERM, and WSP Ltd) – environment and silos on the Sellafield site, the Associate editor: Jackie Whitelaw, And there are certainly many alternative ideas out there. two hour safety validation, Magnox Swarf storage silo, 07740 740202, sustainability; AECOM, Weston Williamson and Turkington [email protected] The good news is that the momentum behind investing in testing and sign off as testing Martin – town planning, economic development, socio- then packaging it for long- infrastructurecontinues. The challenge, if this is to continue, must work had to be redone or economic and urban design (See opinion p7). term storage. Designer: Kieran McCann, now be to find a system which allows sensible decisions to be made in rechecked. 0779 000 3972, [email protected] sensible timeframes. Seeking a solution must be a task for 2015. Proposals for HS3 have Potentially a fleet of battery ENERGY POLITICS Commercial director: Sally Devine, Antony Oliver, undermined confidence trains could run on lines 07963 934892, editor, Infrastructure Intelligence in planning for HS2 the too difficult or expensive to Longbay Seapower has A potential block [email protected] Public Accounts Committee electrify and help Network notified the Planning on progress of the Other material contributed by: has suggested in its report Rail cut its carbon emissions. Inspectorate of its intention Infrastructure Bill into law Bernadette Ballantyne on “Lessons from major rail to submit a planning was overcome as government infrastructure programmes”. Transport for London’s application to construct a has agreed to exclude Scotland Produced by Victoria Street Capital on It questioned why there had proposals to extend London 21km tidal lagoon covering from laws making it easier behalf of the Association for Consultancy & Contents Engineering, 12 Caxton St, London SW1H 0QL. been no assessment before the Overground services to 72 square kilometres off for fracking firms to drill for News roundup 5 This month’s top infrastructure stories go ahead of HS2 as to whether Barking Riverside received the coast of West Somerset shale gas. Fracking is part of The views expressed in Infrastructure Opinion 6 Comment from Uwe Kruger, Michele Dix, Nick Baveystock, Paul Sheffield, better rail services in the overwhelming support in the in the Bristol Channel in the bill which also includes Intelligence are not necessarily those of the Ailie MacAdam, Nelson Ogunshakin, Steve Fox and Graham Watts North were a greater priority. recent public consultation with 2018. The lagoon, which will legislation to create Highways Association for Consultancy & Engineering. The PAC also queried whether 90 per cent of respondents be a Nationally Significant England. The Scottish Interview 10 Thames Tideway Tunnel CEO Andy Mitchell explains the £4.1bn project Printer: CPG, 9-10 Orchard Business Centre, Department for Transport in favour of the extension. Infrastructure Project government, the Scottish Sanderson Way, Tonbridge, Kent TN9 1QG. Crossrail 14 Tunnelling is finishing; time to think about the railway. has in place a proper strategy The Barking Riverside (NSIP), involves building a Labour Party and the Scottish T 01732 366666, [email protected] for major rail project development is the largest continuous breakwater wall Green Party had opposed the Politics 17 Stephen Hammond on the need for a Department for Infrastructure. 2015 Subscription rates: £80 a year. development. housing development site in spanning from Culvercliff bill but with the fracking Company profile 18 Jason Millett of Mace on building his infrastructure business. east London with planning in Minehead to Lilstock exclusion the Scotland Infrastructure Intelligence produces a weekly The first battery-powered consent for up to 10,800 homes (approximately 21 km long) Office said “the opposition free newsletter. Sign up at the website: Business 20 SMEs get to grips with outsourcing and tech investment. train to run on Britain’s but development can only be to create a tidal lagoon was content to withdraw its www.infrastructure-intelligence.com rail network in more than realised if the railway line is and associated electricity amendments”. Management 22 AECOM’s Richard Marwood shares tips on creating a successful alliance. Follow us on twitter @infra_intel half a century carried built. generating infrastructure with Join the Infrastructure Intelligence group Risk management 24 Contractors top the risk register, our breakfast meeting revealed. its first passengers in a generating capacity of circa on Linkedin January. The Bombardier A Costain and Skanska 2.8GW per annum. REGIONS Policy 28 More support needed in public procurement to hit SME targets. Class 379 Electrostar joint venture has won the Rail 29 Gerard Fitzpatrick of Sweett Group on developing a rail business. battery powered train also last Crossrail tunnelling The Nuclear First meeting of Transport known as an Independently contract, worth £40M, to Decommissioning Authority for the North took place in Careers 31 Matchtech’s Grahame Carter on securing talent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015
    Crossrail 2 factsheet: Services between Berrylands and Hampton Court New Crossrail 2 services are proposed to serve all stations between Berrylands and Hampton Court, with 4 trains per hour in each direction operating directly to, and across central London. What is Crossrail 2? Crossrail 2 in this area Crossrail 2 is a proposed new railway serving London and the wider South East that could be open by 2030. It would connect the existing National Rail networks in Surrey and Hertfordshire with trains running through a new tunnel from Wimbledon to Tottenham Hale and New Southgate. Crossrail 2 will connect directly with National Rail, London Underground, London Overground, Crossrail 1, High Speed 1 international and domestic and High Speed 2 services, meaning passengers will be one change away from over 800 destinations nationwide. Why do we need Crossrail 2? The South West Main Line is one of the busiest and most congested routes in the country. It already faces capacity constraints and demand for National Rail services into Waterloo is forecast to increase by at least 40% by 2043. This means the severe crowding on the network will nearly double, and would likely lead to passengers being unable to board trains at some stations. Crossrail 2 provides a solution. It would free up space on the railway helping to reduce congestion, and would enable us to run more local services to central London that bypass the most congested stations. Transport improvements already underway will help offset the pressure in the short term. But we need Crossrail 2 to cope with longer term growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Hsuk London Terminal Strategy
    HSUK LONDON TERMINAL STRATEGY In the development of high speed rail systems, the issue of terminal location and onward distribution of passengers assumes almost as much importance as the more obvious question of route. The new lines are designed to carry large volumes of passengers on trains operating at high frequencies, and these factors combine to create major flows arriving at city terminals which must then be efficiently dispersed onto the local public transport networks. This demands full integration of high speed and local systems, with optimised transfer at dedicated and fit-for- purpose terminals. These issues apply at all UK cities where high speed lines are planned, but are most acute in London, where passenger flows are greatest, and congestion in the existing public transport system is most critical. The following diagrams review existing central London connectivity issues, and compare and contrast the London terminal solutions proposed for HS2, and for the alternative High Speed UK proposals. For precise details of the core High Speed UK proposals (as included in the cost estimates), see the ‘200k’ series of plans. LTS1 : LONDON MAIN LINE NETWORK CIRCA 1963 LTS2 : EXISTING CENTRAL LONDON RAIL NETWORK INCLUDING CROSSRAIL SCHEME These diagrams show the rail network of central London, dominated by the classic terminus stations of the Victorian era. These are mostly reliant for onward connectivity upon the Tube network, which tended to form ‘nodes’ around the busier/more important termini. However, the change from main line to Tube is inherently inefficient, with passengers forced to detrain en masse, and with massive congestion occurring especially at rush hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midland Main Line and the Influence of HS2 a Short Report for North West Leicestershire District Council
    The Midland Main Line and the influence of HS2 A short report for North West Leicestershire District Council 1. Introduction Concerns have been raised recently about the relationship between the Midland Main Line (MML) and HS2, and whether the high-speed line is likely to have adverse effects on the existing network. At first sight, these concerns do not appear unreasonable in the context of recent Network Rail/Department for Transport decisions: There will be no electrification north of Kettering as this work has been halted in this and other locations. This raises a question about the viability of the Classic Connection with HS2 at Toton The new East Midlands contract will be 7+2, reducing the incentive for a new train operator to invest in new rolling stock; HSTs are scheduled to come out of service by 2019; possible replacements will not be able to attain the same speeds and this could adversely affect journey times. These points together make depressing reading, and it is understandable why there is a feeling that the MML is being sacrificed in favour of HS2 to make it a more attractive prospect for this part of England. The relationship between the MML and HS2 is an important one in the District, and currently it is finely balanced. The Council has been broadly supportive of the scheme because of the economic benefits that will follow on from the construction and operation of HS2, but there is a danger that this could change, particularly if continued opposition from residents and businesses alters the view of the elected members.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed 2: Spring 2020 Update
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts High Speed 2: Spring 2020 update Third Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 6 May 2020 HC 84 Published on 17 May 2020 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Gareth Bacon MP (Conservative, Orpington) Kemi Badenoch MP (Conservative, Saffron Walden) Olivia Blake MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hallam) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Dame Cheryl Gillan MP (Conservative, Chesham and Amersham) Peter Grant MP (Scottish National Party, Glenrothes) Mr Richard Holden MP (Conservative, North West Durham) Sir Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, Thanet) Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham, Ladywood) Gagan Mohindra MP (Conservative, South West Hertfordshire) Sarah Olney MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) James Wild MP (Conservative, North West Norfolk) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Intelligence Tablet Edition |
    ISSUE 09 | April 2015 INTERVIEW Davendra Dabasia of Mace talks leadership page 26 ANALYSIS ACE NEWS Crunch carbon Danny Alexander cut costs on infrastructure page 16 beyond the election page 28 Produced for the industry by the Association for Consultancy and Engineering And we’re off! Highways England’s £11bn five year plan page 12 MESSAGE FROM THE EDITOR News roundup With the UK’s most unpredictable General Election in decades almost upon us, the question remains whether or not the increasingly rosy infrastructure and support infrastructure sector should start to worry? BUSINESS research and the development For on the one hand we continue to see unprecedented levels of of new manufacturing cross party support for the £466bn National Infrastructure Plan, major Austerity is set to end facilities and training. schemes such as HS2 and for devolved powers to drive investment into in 2019, a year earlier areas such as the “Northern Powerhouse”. than originally planned, Chief construction adviser And we see long term spending plans being rolled out across the Chancellor George Osborne Peter Hansford has called highways sector, the rail industry, power, water and communications as promised in his 2105 Budget for evidence on how to the clear link between investment and economic growth is driven home. speech. Infrastructure didn’t unlock demand, improve Yet on the other hand there is no question in anyone’s minds that get a big build up in Osborne’s affordability and increase the post-Election economy will be tough and getting tougher. Not least Commons speech which attractiveness of solid focused on economic successes wall insulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Matter M76 Further Suggested Changes to Be Made to Policy T3 Transport Capacity, Connectivity and Safeguarding and Policy T9 Fu
    Matter M76 Further suggested changes to be made to Policy T3 Transport capacity, connectivity and safeguarding and Policy T9 Funding transport infrastructure through planning • Bold blue – new text • Blue strikethrough – deleted original plan text • Purple strikethrough – deleted minor suggested change text • Bold purple- reinstated original text • Red bold – Minor Suggested change • Red strike through – minor suggested change Change ref no Policy/para Further suggested change /table/map M76.1 Policy T3, table 10.1 Transformation of Oxford Street low 2017- 2022 M76.2 Policy T3, table 10.1 ULEZ in central and inner London medium 2017- 2021 0 ULEZ in inner London low 2020- 2030 ULEZ strengthening London-wide low 2020- for buses, coaches and HGVs 2030 M76.3 Policy T3, table 10.1 Walk and cycle bridge between low 2020- Nine Elms and Pimlico river 2030 crossing: Nine Elms Pimlico Bridge M76.4 Policy T3, table 10.1 Bus network: wheelchair accessible low 2017- bus stops 2020 2041 M76.5 Policy T3, table 10.1 Bus transit pilots in Opportunity low 2020- Areas 2041 M76.6 Policy T3, table 10.1 Coach hub(s) upgrade and/or medium 2020- reprovision 2023 30 30 M76.7 Policy T3, table 10.1 Elizabeth line high 2017- 2021 0 M76.8 Policy T3, table 10.1 Elizabeth line extension / rail medium 2020- enhancements east of Abbey Wood / high 2041 M76.9 Policy T3, table 10.1 Heathrow Airport Southern Rail medium 2020 Access (required for if airport high - expansion proceeds) 2041 Heathrow Airport Western Rail medium 2020 Access (required for if airport high - expansion
    [Show full text]
  • Colin Matthews
    ISSUE 04 | September 2014 ANALYSIS Class of 2001: where are they now? page 27 OPINION CAREERS Ailie MacAdam Rise of the on HS2 apprentices page 10 page 24 Produced for the industry by the Association for Consultancy and Engineering Colin Matthews The Highways Agency’s £24bn man page 12 MESSAGE FROM THE EDITOR News roundup In his interview with Infrastructure Intelligence this month, new Highways Agency chairman Colin Matthews is very clear about the need Installing smart meters in for the whole industry to embrace new technologies and new ideas as ENVIRONMENT every house in the UK will the Agency embarks on its £24bn investment programme. save consumers “only 2%” “This is not a business as usual static environment,” he said. “It is a New delays for the on their annual bills, the fantastic opportunity with some really serious investment behind it to implementation of Public Accounts Committee take Britain’s roads on a journey,” sustainable drainage has warned. On average, And while it is absolutely clear that to accommodate the scary systems (SuDS) have been consumers will save just £26 prediction for a 46% growth in traffic on the nation’s strategic road revealed after Secretary of a year and the technology network by 2040 we will have to spend some of that money improving State for Environment, Food could be out of date by the and enhancing the physical network, it is also clear that technology will and Rural Affairs, Elizabeth time the roll out is complete, have to play a massive role. Truss announced a further six the committee said.
    [Show full text]
  • Bakerloo Line Extension Consultation Report
    Bakerloo line extension Consultation Report November 2020 Contents 1. Executive summary ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Summary of responses received ........................................................................ 6 1.3 Summary of next steps .................................................................................... 12 2. About the proposals .......................................................................................... 13 2.1 Overview .......................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Why the extension is needed ........................................................................... 13 2.3 What we have already consulted about ........................................................... 15 2.4 Our proposals .................................................................................................. 16 2.5 Stations ............................................................................................................ 16 2.6 Tunnel alignment ............................................................................................. 16 2.7 Worksites ......................................................................................................... 17 2.8 Shafts ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Megaprojects: a Design and Strategy
    Megaprojects: A Design and Strategy Perspective A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Colm Lundrigan Manchester Business School Contents CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... 5 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ 6 DECLARATION & COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ................................................................................ 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 9 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 11 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 11 2 RESEARCH SETTING
    [Show full text]
  • The Key to Mastering Complexity
    Interview hat does it take to with existing infrastructure around really crystallised what’s the required deliver complex infra- it, as well as engaging with stakehold- output, the desired outcome of the structure projects on ers and retaining their confidence. programme, and do you have the time and on budget? She expanded on her thoughts for ability to verbalise what that is? Have Deliverability ForW decades UK construction was Transport Times, and explained the dis- you assessed the risks and incor- needs a plagued by an apparent inability to tinction she makes between deliverabil- porated that into the baseline?” razor-like undertake flagship schemes without ity and constructability. Constructabili- Constructability is a subset: vision of what them being late or over budget. Recent- ty is clearly essential, but deliverability, part of deliverability is to have a ly, with projects such as the Olympics she explains, takes a wider perspective. project that’s constructable. the project’s and High Speed 1, the industry has “I see deliverability as being the “That requires engagement with all about turned this around. But it’s a reputation bigger umbrella with constructability the supply chain,” she adds, “because that is hard won and easily lost, says fitting under it,” she says. Deliver- the supply chain are the experts and managing director for Europe and ability covers questions such as do have the experience and knowledge Africa infrastructure Ailie MacAdam. you have an aligned agenda with about the constructability, and it’s Ms MacAdam has 30 years’ expe- the stakeholders? Do the cost, the really important that stakeholders and rience with construction and project programme and the scope make decision-makers on the programme management giant Bechtel, which sense? Do you have a supply chain engage the supply chain early in order has a global reputation for successful that can respond to the cost and to get the input on constructability.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of High Speed 2 Dissenting Report by Lord Tony Berkeley House of Lords Former Deputy Chair of the Review Group Set up B
    A Review of High Speed 2 Dissenting Report by Lord Tony Berkeley House of Lords Former Deputy Chair of the Review Group set up by Grant Shapps MP, Secretary of State for Transport in August 2019 5th January 2020 Review of High Speed 2 – Dissenting Report by Lord Tony Berkeley Page 1 Foreword By Tony Berkeley, former Deputy Chair of the Oakervee Review into HS2. In August 2019, the Secretary of State for Transport, Grant Shapps MP, appointed Douglas Oakervee to lead a report into ‘whether and how we should proceed’ with HS2 Ltd. ahead of the Notice to Proceed’ decision for Phase 1 (London to West Midlands) due by the end of 2019. Douglas Oakervee appointed me as Deputy Chair with a panel of experts to feed into and be consulted on the report’s conclusions. These appointments terminated on 31 October 2019 before the drafting was complete. I and panel members were shown a copy of the then final draft report in early November but were not given any opportunity to request significant changes. I was not asked to sign it as Deputy Chair and informed the Chairman that I did not support its draft conclusions. I wrote to Douglas Oakervee listing my concerns, including a bias towards accepting HS2’s evidence in preference to those of others, leading to what I considered to be a critical but supportive recommendation for HS2 Ltd. to continue. I do not believe that the evidence that the Review received supports this view. (See my letter in Appendix 2). Parts of the draft Review were subsequently leaked to the media in November, but it is not known whether the text leaked was and is the final text, and when and whether it was as submitted by Doug Oakervee to the Secretary of State for Transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Midland Main Line Speed-Up
    RA 004 1 February 2014 action Midland main line speed-up New 125 speed limit signs being installed at Bromham Road bridge, Bedford. From left, are Richard Walker, the route delivery director (East Midlands) for Network Rail, Dave Diskin, the framework manager from contractor Carillion and David Horne, managing director for East Midlands Trains Picture: East Midlands Trains For the first time, trains are now able to operate at speeds of up to 125 mph on action certain parts of the Midland main line, after a £70 million line improvement scheme delivered by Network Rail in partnership with East Midlands Trains. The faster timetable was good news for passengers travelling between London and railaction Sheffield, Chesterfield, Derby, Nottingham, East Midlands Parkway, Leicester and Loughborough. railaction is edited by A total of 159 miles of track was upgraded, some level crossings were replaced John Stanford by bridges, and signalling modified. It allowed EMT to reduce the average 82 Colvestone Crescent weekday journey time between Sheffield and London by seven minutes, between London E8 2LJ Nottingham and London by five minutes and between Derby and London by four minutes. Further improvements to journey times will be introduced during 2014. “The route provides a vital artery for South Yorkshire, the East Midlands and john.stanford Northamptonshire,” said David Horne, EMT managing director. “Faster journeys are @railwatch.org.uk vital for economic growth and this major investment in track and signalling will help us to provide faster and more reliable journeys.” 020 7254 3885 www.eastmidlandstrains.co.uk Network Rail’s maintenance underspend causes delays The Office of Rail Regulation believes over half of the delays on the network arise from failures by Network Rail and of these, about half are the result of infrastructure twitter: @railfuture failures.
    [Show full text]