DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX a Table 6.1 Indicative List of Transport Schemes Rail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX a Table 6.1 Indicative List of Transport Schemes Rail APPENDIX A Table 6.1 Indicative list of transport schemes cost Anticipated completion 2010- 2013- Post Scheme Description 2012* 2020† 2020 2013- 2017- Post 2016 21/22 2022 Rail Core scheme: Maidenhead and Heathrow in the west Crossrail 1 H to Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east High Speed 1 International services stopping at Stratford L Direct services to a wider range of European High Speed 1 destinations (making use of new European L infrastructure) High Speed 2 London to the West Midlands and beyond. H High Speed 1 Enhanced Domestic Services L Improved rail freight New and/or expanded rail freight terminals to serve terminals to serve L London London Improved rail freight Rail link from Barking - Gospel Oak line to West Coast M routes Main Line Improved rail freight Further capacity enhancement for the Felixstowe - M routes Nuneaton route Westerly extension(s) potentially to Reading/Milton Crossrail 1 Keynes/ Watford/ Staines (via Airtrack) and/or M extensions additional services to Heathrow and West Drayton Easterly extension from Abbey Wood - Gravesend Crossrail 2 Enhanced southwest – northeast London capacity and (formerly Chelsea connectivity. Scheme detail to be reviewed to ensure H Hackney line) maximum benefits and value for money London Overground- Scheme to provide a fifth carriage (and Capacity associated infrastructure works on the north, M Improvement west and east London lines, as well as the Euston Programme – Watford ‘DC’ line) London Overground Further train lengthening L Diversion of Watford services to Stratford (instead of London Overground M Euston) to release capacity for High Speed 2 at Euston Programme of expansion and enhancement of services London Overground M all completed by 2012 Barking - Gospel Oak line – electrification and train London Overground L lengthening London Overground Extension from Barking to Barking Riverside M West Anglia 12 car capability to Stansted and Cambridge L Stratford –Angel Road capacity enhancement to West Anglia M enable the running of 4 trains per hour. Further service enhancements (including four- West Anglia M/H tracking) across the whole of the Lea Valley line Thameside South Twelve- car capability on all routes (HLOS CP4) M Essex Thameside South Further capacity increases M Essex Further capacity increases including increased Essex Thameside M speeds on the Tilbury loop and more 12 car services APPENDIX A cost Anticipated completion 2010- 2013- Post Scheme Description 2012* 2020† 2020 2013- 2017- Post 2016 21/22 2022 Chiltern Enhanced inner suburban service (HLOS CP4) L Ten-car capability on inner suburban South Central London Twelve-car capability and additional fast services M/L (HLOS CP4) South Central London Further CP5 capacity increases M Works to allow 12 car running on Sidcup Bexleyheath, Greenwich, Woolwich, Dartford, Rochester, Hayes & Sevenoaks routes and Southeast London redevelopment work at Victoria and Charing M Cross Train lengthening on services to Cannon Street/Charing Cross (HLOS CP4) Southeast London Further CP5 capacity increases M Ten-car capability on inner suburban and Windsor lines Southwest London M (HLOS CP4) Southwest London Further CP5 capacity increases M Great Western Train lengthening (HLOS CP4) L Electrification with associated change in rolling Great Western H stock allocation Great Northern Train lengthening (HLOS CP4) L Great Northern Further CP5 capacity increases L Further CP5 capacity increases including Bow Junction remodeling which will help increase Great Eastern L frequency of outer suburban services from 24 to 28 tph Additional and longer outer services (HLOS CP4). Great Eastern L Additional inner services (HLOS CP4) Train lengthening and frequency improvements (HLOS West Coast L CP4) West Coast Further CP5 capacity increases L December 2011 12 car capability on most of mainline Thameslink H and 16 trains per hour through core End of 2018: 24 trains per hour through core, Thameslink H expanded network Thameslink Make greater use of 12-car capability coverage M Passenger congestion relief/onward movement Rail termini capacity enhancement works. Schemes under enhancement M development including the provision of step free access. Strategic Interchanges Programme of schemes under development M Improved access to For example, enhanced bus services and interchange at L enhanced rail services selected Crossrail and/or Thameslink stations Improved access to Heathrow Airport from south Airport access M London being considered Link South West Trains network to Heathrow (part- Airtrack M funded) Tube Jubilee line upgrade in delivery phase to provide Jubilee line M additional capacity and improve journey times. Under APPENDIX A cost Anticipated completion 2010- 2013- Post Scheme Description 2012* 2020† 2020 2013- 2017- Post 2016 21/22 2022 the World Class Capacity programme, further peak service train increases are planned, subject to fleet expansion. Phase 1: Northern line upgrade in delivery phase to Northern line provide additional capacity and improve journey M timesby the end of 2012 Phase 2: Northern line Upgrade 2 to deliver a further Northern line 20 per cent increase in capacity through the M simplification and recasting of service patterns Extension of the Northern line from Kennington Northern line to Battersea to support the regeneration of the M Extension Vauxhall/Nine Elms/Battersea area Victoria line upgrade in delivery phase including new rolling stock and signalling to provide additional capacity and improve journey times. Under the Victoria line M World Class Capacity programme, further peak service train increases are planned, subject to fleet expansion. Piccadilly line upgrade to provide additional capacity Piccadilly line and improve journey times First new trains M expected to be delivered 2021/22 Circle, District,Hammersmith & City and Metropolitan Sub-Surface Railway lines upgrade (including new air-conditioned rolling H (SSR) stock and new signalling) to provide additional capacity and improve journey times Metropolitan line Croxley rail link to Watford Junction M Central line upgrade: Including new energy Central line efficient and high capacity rolling stock and M signalling Bakerloo line upgrade: Including new energy efficient Bakerloo line M and high capacity rolling stock and signalling Bakerloo line southern extension; potential scheme Bakerloo line H and route under investigation Station refurbishment/ Continuing programme of refurbishment/ H modernisation/ modernisation of stations programme Programme of core asset renewal to lock in benefits Core asset renewal from the upgrades and maintain assets in a state of H good repair Tube station Congestion relief (and step free access) schemes, congestion relief including Victoria, Tottenham Court Road, Bond schemes Street, Bank (part-funded),Paddington (Hammersmith & City line), Holborn, Camden. H Further tube station congestion relief A targeted station capacity programme looking at schemes further congestion relief schemes Energy-saving Initially, A programme of trials work to include low initiatives energy lighting, smart electricity metering at stations and low loss conductor rails L/M Regenerative braking and automatic train To be implemented as an integral part of the Tube control upgrade programme APPENDIX A cost Anticipated completion 2010- 2013- Post Scheme Description 2012* 2020† 2020 2013- 2017- Post 2016 21/22 2022 DLR Reconfiguration of To temporarily relieve crowding until additional L train interiors trains are procured North Route Double Tracking (works associated with To increase reliability, frequency and capacity of L Crossrail funded- to line be delivered by 2019) Additional Rolling To support large scale developments e.g. Royal L/M Stock Docks and Olympic Park Station Improved efficiency of interchange to Improvement and accommodate increased passenger flows capacity work: resulting from large scale developments, including: Royal Albert and Gallions Reach station capacity upgrades L Congestion relief at Canning Town Increase capacity for interchange between DLR and Crossrail (eg Custom House) to support Royal Docks developments Increase Shadwell station capacity to accommodate increasing passenger flows Work to support Mayor’s Vision of DLR extension from Lewisham towards Bromley. DLR Extensions H Work towards potential extensions west of Bank, and east of Gallions Reach. Network wide capacity upgrade to Enabling a 50 per cent increase in capacity M three car services Extension Stratford to To be completed summer 2011 M Canning Town Potential extensions and/or capacity increases such as Gallions Reach – Dagenham Dock, bank to Victoria Further DLR network Stratford international to Walthamstow central via M enhancements Leytonstone, lewisham to Catford/Catford Bridge/Hither Green, Hayesbeckenham via Catford Tramlink Further Potential extensions and/or capacity increases L/M enhancements to the Tramlink Double tracking to Wimbledon L network Buses and bus transit (Phase 1a Ilford – Dagenham Dock completed 2010) East London Transit Phase 1b (Barking to Dagenham Dock via Barking L Riverside), services starting in 2013 APPENDIX A cost Anticipated completion 2010- 2013- Post Scheme Description 2012* 2020† 2020 2013- 2017- Post 2016 21/22 2022 Regular review of bus network, including reviews of the strategic priorities underlying the process approximately every five years, to cater for population Bus network and employment growth, maintain ease of use, M development attractive frequencies and adequate capacity, reliable services, good
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Accessible Overground Stations Grouped by Overground Line
    List of Accessible Overground Stations Grouped by Overground Line Legend: Page | 1 = Step-free access street to platform = Step-free access street to train This information was correct at time of publication. Please check Transport for London for further information regarding station access. This list was compiled by Benjamin Holt, Transport for All 29/05/2019. Canada Water Step-free access street to train East London line Haggerston Step-free access street to platform Dalston Hoxton Step-free access street to platform Junction - New New Cross Step-free access street to platform Cross Canada Water Step-free access street to platform Clapham High Street Step-free access street to platform Denmark Hill Step-free access street to platform Haggerston Step-free access street to platform Hoxton Step-free access street to platform Peckham Rye Step-free access street to platform Queens Road Peckham Step-free access street to platform East London line Rotherhithe Step-free access street to platform Shadwell Step-free access street to platform Dalston Canada Water Step-free access street to train Junction - Canonbury Step-free access street to train Clapham Crystal Palace Step-free access street to platform Junction Dalston Junction Step-free access street to train Forest Hill Step-free access street to platform Haggerston Step-free access street to train Highbury & Islington Step-free access street to platform Honor Oak Park Step-free access street to platform Hoxton Step-free access street to train New Cross Gate Step-free access street to platform
    [Show full text]
  • Hampton Court to Berrylands / Oct 2015
    Crossrail 2 factsheet: Services between Berrylands and Hampton Court New Crossrail 2 services are proposed to serve all stations between Berrylands and Hampton Court, with 4 trains per hour in each direction operating directly to, and across central London. What is Crossrail 2? Crossrail 2 in this area Crossrail 2 is a proposed new railway serving London and the wider South East that could be open by 2030. It would connect the existing National Rail networks in Surrey and Hertfordshire with trains running through a new tunnel from Wimbledon to Tottenham Hale and New Southgate. Crossrail 2 will connect directly with National Rail, London Underground, London Overground, Crossrail 1, High Speed 1 international and domestic and High Speed 2 services, meaning passengers will be one change away from over 800 destinations nationwide. Why do we need Crossrail 2? The South West Main Line is one of the busiest and most congested routes in the country. It already faces capacity constraints and demand for National Rail services into Waterloo is forecast to increase by at least 40% by 2043. This means the severe crowding on the network will nearly double, and would likely lead to passengers being unable to board trains at some stations. Crossrail 2 provides a solution. It would free up space on the railway helping to reduce congestion, and would enable us to run more local services to central London that bypass the most congested stations. Transport improvements already underway will help offset the pressure in the short term. But we need Crossrail 2 to cope with longer term growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Hsuk London Terminal Strategy
    HSUK LONDON TERMINAL STRATEGY In the development of high speed rail systems, the issue of terminal location and onward distribution of passengers assumes almost as much importance as the more obvious question of route. The new lines are designed to carry large volumes of passengers on trains operating at high frequencies, and these factors combine to create major flows arriving at city terminals which must then be efficiently dispersed onto the local public transport networks. This demands full integration of high speed and local systems, with optimised transfer at dedicated and fit-for- purpose terminals. These issues apply at all UK cities where high speed lines are planned, but are most acute in London, where passenger flows are greatest, and congestion in the existing public transport system is most critical. The following diagrams review existing central London connectivity issues, and compare and contrast the London terminal solutions proposed for HS2, and for the alternative High Speed UK proposals. For precise details of the core High Speed UK proposals (as included in the cost estimates), see the ‘200k’ series of plans. LTS1 : LONDON MAIN LINE NETWORK CIRCA 1963 LTS2 : EXISTING CENTRAL LONDON RAIL NETWORK INCLUDING CROSSRAIL SCHEME These diagrams show the rail network of central London, dominated by the classic terminus stations of the Victorian era. These are mostly reliant for onward connectivity upon the Tube network, which tended to form ‘nodes’ around the busier/more important termini. However, the change from main line to Tube is inherently inefficient, with passengers forced to detrain en masse, and with massive congestion occurring especially at rush hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midland Main Line and the Influence of HS2 a Short Report for North West Leicestershire District Council
    The Midland Main Line and the influence of HS2 A short report for North West Leicestershire District Council 1. Introduction Concerns have been raised recently about the relationship between the Midland Main Line (MML) and HS2, and whether the high-speed line is likely to have adverse effects on the existing network. At first sight, these concerns do not appear unreasonable in the context of recent Network Rail/Department for Transport decisions: There will be no electrification north of Kettering as this work has been halted in this and other locations. This raises a question about the viability of the Classic Connection with HS2 at Toton The new East Midlands contract will be 7+2, reducing the incentive for a new train operator to invest in new rolling stock; HSTs are scheduled to come out of service by 2019; possible replacements will not be able to attain the same speeds and this could adversely affect journey times. These points together make depressing reading, and it is understandable why there is a feeling that the MML is being sacrificed in favour of HS2 to make it a more attractive prospect for this part of England. The relationship between the MML and HS2 is an important one in the District, and currently it is finely balanced. The Council has been broadly supportive of the scheme because of the economic benefits that will follow on from the construction and operation of HS2, but there is a danger that this could change, particularly if continued opposition from residents and businesses alters the view of the elected members.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed 2: Spring 2020 Update
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts High Speed 2: Spring 2020 update Third Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 6 May 2020 HC 84 Published on 17 May 2020 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Gareth Bacon MP (Conservative, Orpington) Kemi Badenoch MP (Conservative, Saffron Walden) Olivia Blake MP (Labour, Sheffield, Hallam) Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP (Conservative, The Cotswolds) Dame Cheryl Gillan MP (Conservative, Chesham and Amersham) Peter Grant MP (Scottish National Party, Glenrothes) Mr Richard Holden MP (Conservative, North West Durham) Sir Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, Harwich and North Essex) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, Thanet) Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour, Birmingham, Ladywood) Gagan Mohindra MP (Conservative, South West Hertfordshire) Sarah Olney MP (Liberal Democrat, Richmond Park) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Nick Smith MP (Labour, Blaenau Gwent) James Wild MP (Conservative, North West Norfolk) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbey Line Report 060615
    Hertfordshire County Council Abbey Line Passenger Survey FINAL REPORT June 2006 The Railway Consultancy Ltd 1st Floor, South Tower Crystal Palace Station London SE19 2AZ Tel. 020-8676 0395 Fax. 020-8778 7439 1 Executive Summary E1 The Abbey Line between Watford Junction and St Albans Abbey is a single-track Community Rail Partnership (CRP) line. Although currently operated by Silverlink, the line is to be part of the new West Midlands franchise, due to commence on 11 November 2007. The Community Rail Partnership is seeking to increase the frequency of services on the route, to a half-hourly level, thus requiring a second trainset and passing loop to be installed. The CRP therefore commissioned The Railway Consultancy to undertake a series of passenger counts and surveys of passenger travel patterns, in order to provide a basis on which business planning might be undertaken. E2 Analysis of passenger usage on the line was based upon surveying all weekday and weekend services once during May 2006. This encompassed the counting and alighting of boarders at every Abbey Line station and a series of on-train counts. In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to passengers. A total of 1300 forms were distributed; by the closing date of 9 th June 2006, a total of 496 survey forms were returned completed, representing a response rate of 38%. E3 Count data across the survey period revealed that passenger numbers on the line were somewhat disappointing. The total number of boarders (i.e. across both directions) for weekdays, Saturdays and Sundays were respectively around 1300, 1000 and 450 per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Convent-Of-Jesus-And-Mary-Prospectus-2020-21.Pdf
    Convent of Jesus and Mary Language College Welcome Bem-vinda Swagat Witamy Maraming salamat Daghang salamat Boyei bolamu Chào mùừng Bienvenidas Bienvenue Üdvözöljük Yevkar Huān yíng A very warm welcome to the Convent of Jesus and Mary; We are also very proud of our international community at the a high-performing and aspirational school for girls and one Convent; we have children and staff from all over the world of very few all-girls schools in the north-west area of London. joining together as one united school family. Our Research We are very proud of the academic achievements of all School pioneers work to promote social and racial justice our girls: those who pursue their routes into medicine, law, and equality, and our unique Student Parliament prepares accountancy and business and those who flourish in our girls to stand up for what they believe in with a voice the arts, literature, the humanities and sports. Our girls leave rooted in educated, universal values and spirit. Many of us to attend top universities, including Oxford, Cambridge our girls go on to forge careers in international relations as and Russell Group universities. Our unique international a result of their Convent education, with a wish to make a programme enables our girls to study abroad with routes to positive difference in the world. Ivy League colleges in the USA on fully-funded scholarships. We champion girls and believe that an all-girls education Ethos We are a Catholic school, founded in the 19th century, provides an important foundation for nurturing and on a very special mission to educate girls to the highest strengthening the confidence and aspirations and the voices We nurture each of our girls to become confident, resilient Our History level and prepare them to take their places in the world as of women of the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Matter M76 Further Suggested Changes to Be Made to Policy T3 Transport Capacity, Connectivity and Safeguarding and Policy T9 Fu
    Matter M76 Further suggested changes to be made to Policy T3 Transport capacity, connectivity and safeguarding and Policy T9 Funding transport infrastructure through planning • Bold blue – new text • Blue strikethrough – deleted original plan text • Purple strikethrough – deleted minor suggested change text • Bold purple- reinstated original text • Red bold – Minor Suggested change • Red strike through – minor suggested change Change ref no Policy/para Further suggested change /table/map M76.1 Policy T3, table 10.1 Transformation of Oxford Street low 2017- 2022 M76.2 Policy T3, table 10.1 ULEZ in central and inner London medium 2017- 2021 0 ULEZ in inner London low 2020- 2030 ULEZ strengthening London-wide low 2020- for buses, coaches and HGVs 2030 M76.3 Policy T3, table 10.1 Walk and cycle bridge between low 2020- Nine Elms and Pimlico river 2030 crossing: Nine Elms Pimlico Bridge M76.4 Policy T3, table 10.1 Bus network: wheelchair accessible low 2017- bus stops 2020 2041 M76.5 Policy T3, table 10.1 Bus transit pilots in Opportunity low 2020- Areas 2041 M76.6 Policy T3, table 10.1 Coach hub(s) upgrade and/or medium 2020- reprovision 2023 30 30 M76.7 Policy T3, table 10.1 Elizabeth line high 2017- 2021 0 M76.8 Policy T3, table 10.1 Elizabeth line extension / rail medium 2020- enhancements east of Abbey Wood / high 2041 M76.9 Policy T3, table 10.1 Heathrow Airport Southern Rail medium 2020 Access (required for if airport high - expansion proceeds) 2041 Heathrow Airport Western Rail medium 2020 Access (required for if airport high - expansion
    [Show full text]
  • Bakerloo Line Extension Consultation Report
    Bakerloo line extension Consultation Report November 2020 Contents 1. Executive summary ................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Summary of responses received ........................................................................ 6 1.3 Summary of next steps .................................................................................... 12 2. About the proposals .......................................................................................... 13 2.1 Overview .......................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Why the extension is needed ........................................................................... 13 2.3 What we have already consulted about ........................................................... 15 2.4 Our proposals .................................................................................................. 16 2.5 Stations ............................................................................................................ 16 2.6 Tunnel alignment ............................................................................................. 16 2.7 Worksites ......................................................................................................... 17 2.8 Shafts ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Megaprojects: a Design and Strategy
    Megaprojects: A Design and Strategy Perspective A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Colm Lundrigan Manchester Business School Contents CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................... 5 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................ 6 DECLARATION & COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ................................................................................ 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 9 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................. 10 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 11 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................... 11 2 RESEARCH SETTING
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyngton Wards Are Major Destinations in Themselves in Addition to Being Residential Areas
    ELECTORAL REVIEW OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BRENT WARDING PATTERN SUBMISSION BY THE BRENT CONSERVATIVE GROUP RESPONSE TO THE LGBCE CONSULTATION NOVEMBER 2018 1 | P a g e Introduction Why Brent? During the current London Government Boundary Commission Executive (LGBCE) review process, it has become clear to us that since the previous review in 2000, warding levels have developed out of balance. Brent Council meets the Commission’s criteria for electoral inequality with 7 wards having a variance outside 10%. The outliers are Brondesbury Park at -16% and Tokyngton at 28%. Electoral review process The electoral review will have two distinct parts: Council size – The Brent conservative group welcomes to reduce the number of councillors to 57 from current 63. We appreciate that this will require some existing wards to be redrawn, and recognise that this will represent an opportunity to examine whether the existing boundaries are an appropriate reflection of how Brent has developed since 2000. In addition, the establishment of new developments such as South Kilburn Regeneration, Wembley Regeneration, Alperton and Burnt Oak and Colindale area. Ward boundaries – The Commission will re-draw ward boundaries so that they meet their statutory criteria. Should the Commission require any further detail on our scheme we would be very happy to pass on additional information or to arrange a meeting with Commission members or officers to run through the proposals. 2 | P a g e Interests & identities of local communities The Commission will be looking for evidence on a range of issues to support our reasoning. The best evidence for community identity is normally a combination of factual information such as the existence of communication links, facilities and organisations along with an explanation of how local people use those facilities.
    [Show full text]