THE REPUBLIC OF PLATO BOOKS .-

THOMAS HERBERT WARREN, . A.

PREFACE

This little book, slight as it is, has been, I am afraid, somewhat slow in making its appearance. I hope bhat on the whole it has gained more than lost by the lelay. It has been written in the scanty leisure which has formed the occasional interruption of six OT seven much preoccupied years, and again and again [ have had to lay it aside for weeks, or even months. My own knowledge has grown within this period, and my views have both sensibly and insensibly altered, [ hope for the better and truer, but I am not without ^ears that this very advance has introduced somewhat ) inconsistency and unevenness into these pages. Personally, I should have liked to keep it somewhat onger yet upon the stocks, in the hope of removing hese and other blemishes, but I have trespassed too nuch on the long-suffering patience and never-failing ourtesy of my publisher and printer, and perhaps it just as well that my work should now compelled make its venture

Such as it is, it can claim, unless I am mistaken, to ) the first commentary in English on so many as five ooks of the Republic. Plato, so much written about . antiquity, has found, as a whole, few editors, still 3wer commentators, in modem times. The great

THE REPUBLIC OF PLATO

viii Preface.

from his admirable school editions of the Euth3rphro and Crito.

I have also been helped by a little French edition of the Eighth Book by M. Espinas, of Bordeaux, the introduction to which, especially is brightly and sug- gestively written.

I should like, too, to pay a compliment, though rather a general one, to the sister University and the illustrious band of ' Cambridge Platonists ' of our own day, especially to Mr. Archer Hind, whose Phaedo gave me much pleasure and one or two hints, and of whose Timaeus I hope to make more use hereafter.

If Plato has had few editors, he has found many translators. The well-known renderings of the Re- public by Davies and Vaughan and by Jowett are of real help, the first more to the understanding of the letter of Plato, the second to the appreciation of his spirit and soul. Beside these, I have been aided by Engelmann's version, and by the older German rendering with notes of Fahse, and amused by an anonymous French version of 1765.

Other and special debts will be found acknowledged as they arise, nor will I write a preface after the recipe of the wittiest ever written, that to Don Quixote, and append a list of the obvious aids of the Platonic scholar from Timaeus and Proclus to Ast and Eiddell, or of the mass of monographs, theses, school-programmes, and congratulatory epistles which elucidate or obscure the Eepublic.

I will only add that I wish I had become ac- quainted earlier with the brilliant if bold criticism of Teichmiiller's Literarische Fehden, Breslau, 1881, and 1884 ; that for a general account of Plato I think Chaignet's La Vie et les Ecrits Platon, Paris, 1871, deserves to be better known, for it has peculiarly

Preface. ix

the French charm of being readable while didactic and learned without heaviness; and that lastly; I have been inuch interested in two little brochures by a Dutch preacher, which, unless my eye is deceived by the refraction of an imperfect know- ledge of the language, contain some of the prettiest and most appreciative criticism of the prose poetry of Plato which has recently appeared a_" De Dichter zijne Vaterstad by . Was, Predikant Kruisland, Leiden, 1881, and Plato's Politeia by the same as Predikant te St. Oedenrode, Amhem, 1885.

The series to which this book belongs is intended for the use of senior scholars at schools and junior scholars at the universities. These, so far as my ex- perience goes, have not as a rule the time to use many books beside the commentary in hand. I have there- fore aimed at making this commentary sufficient in itself, or as supplemented by ordinary books of refer- ence. At the same time such students as will read the Republic at all will I think be interested by having some indication given them of a fuller treatment. It is often instructive to know that evidence exists and where it might be found, though time does not allow of its being verified at first hand. I am glad to find my view confirmed by the precept and example of Schanz, who says, in his preface to his School Com- mentary on the Euthyphro a_" ^^Selbst eine Ausgahe, die sich ausdriicklich als Schvlausgabe hinsteUt, soil, wie Kriiger richtig hemerkt, heme SchiUerausgahe sein'^

Having such students in view, and dealing only with the first five books of the Eepublic, I have more- over taken Plato rather as a man of letters than as a philosopher. The connexion of these earlier books with the philosophical ideas of the later, still more the 2)hilosophical synthesis of the Bepublic as a whole,

L

X Preface.

with its relation historical or logical, to the Platonic system, are questions I have avoided or perhaps postponed.

I have also purposely not given an analysis. I believe such analyses are most profitably made by the student for himself; but if he seek one to his hand he has an ample choice in those of Jowett, Day, Hoole, and Davies and Vaughan.

To ofi' a new text to the world we should have first determined the relative value of all the mss. of our author, and in any given passage should further have learned to be able to assess the weight of the ruling of the usage Avithin themselves of the mss. it is decided on previous grounds to call in evidence. This I cannot profess to be able to do. To correct de suo a passage here and a passage there without such continuous consideration has always seemed to me a presumptuous and haphazard enterprise, and although good luck and sympathetic ingenuity have occasion- ally divined the trnth by a species of sortilege, the more frequent result has been to multiply the confu- sion of idle printed variants.

I have therefore, though not altogether approving of it, adopted bodily a text presumably consistently com- piled, merely removing a few misprints and, probably, introducing a few others. It is that of Baiter's Fourth Edition, described by him in his preface dated July 24, 1874. It is chiefly noticeable as embodying the emendations of Madvig, and is therefore a highly corrected text. As to many of Madvig's introductions, with some of those of other illitstrious scholars, adopted by Baiter, I am myself very sceptical. I believe that we should preserve more of Plato in preserving more of the text of the great Paris ms. But the few hours of an amateur which I

Prefaca xi

have spent over that famous document would not justify me in doing more than stating my own intuition, the value of which it would take long study to establish. Meanwhile the effect of Madvig's cor- rections is to give us language as I believe less ; Platonic, but certainly more regular, grammatical, and easily intelligible. For a school text this has its advantages. Ere long it is to be hoped the first living authority, Schanz, who has already indicated the lines on which a new text of the Republic should be pre- pared, will apply the results of his unsparing study, and great experience, and his own sure and sanative touch to Plato's masterpiece.

There is left to me the privilege of a preface, to thank those friends who have assisted me in putting together these pages. The part of my work in which I feel most confidence is what I .owe to them.

First and foremost should come my old companion of school and college, Mr. E. N. P. Moor of Clifton. He has kindly been at the pains of reading through the whole of my manuscript and most of the proofs, and there is I think no page of the notes which does not owe something, most owe much, to his sound and graceful scholarship, literary sense, and cultivated educational tact, invaluable alike in correction and suggestion, in the counsels both of omission and insertion.

With such a helper I am peculiarly fortunate to have been able to associate another scholar and school- master a_" Mr. F. Haverfield of Lancing College. Mr. Haverfield has revised for me the latter half of the Commentary. His keen eye, singular critical faculty, his encyclopaedic and methodical knowledge, and especially his wonderful working acquaintance with the bibliography and apparatus of scholarship, could

xii Preface.

not fail to be of great assistance in whatever measure employed ; and I only regret in my own interest and that of my readers that the first half of the book was already stereotyped before I called in his effective aid.

I am also indebted to a Fellow of my own college, the Eev. H. E. Bramley, for reading over the text and comparing it with the Ziirich original.

I must not omit to mention too my friend Mr. Thomas Case, Fellow and Tutor of Corpus Christi College, who has placed at my service a body of annotations made by him in connexion with his college lectures, full of his own sagacious insight and practicality.

Mr. John Addington Symonds will perhaps have ' forgotten, but I do not forget, the valuable and fruit- ful hints and help he gave me some years ago at Davos for the Introduction. In my first book I can- not forego the pleasure of recording the name of one to whom I owe so much.

Finally, I have to thank for a far larger and more constant debt than the very large one which will appear on every page to my old Master and friend, the first and most Platonic of English Platonists, whose , beautiful version and no less beautiful Introductions have done so much to make Plato a delight of the unlearned as well as of the scholar, and an orna- ment once more not only of a dead but of a living literature.

ERRATA AND ADDENDA.

Introduction, page v. , note 3. To the aut/ioritiet quoted add TeichmUIler, Literaiische Fehden, esp. i. 14. 15. / mv^ confeu I Jiave been much ahtiken tlumgh not quite convinced by hit argumentt. The date of the Bcclenazusae remain* a very great difficulty. Op. Chaignet, La. Vie et let 6crita de Platan, p. 361, toith note 2.

ibid, line 6, for was sufficiently, read were sufficiently.

P. xix., note 1, Uut linCy for 444 , read 445 D.

P. xxviii., note 2, for Comic Attic, read Comic. Attic.

P. IL, line 14, /or light, read flight.

P. Ixviii., line IS, add see also TeichmUIler, Lit. Fehd. i. 38. ff.

P. IxxL, noU, add see also TeichmUIler, Lit. Fehd. ii. 369.

P. Ixxii., note, line 2, for past Platonic, read post-FIatonic. Notes :a_"

P. 159, Kn< 81, /or clxxxix, rA«M? lxxxix.

Jbid. line 32, /or Belck, read Beck.

P. 176, line 24, for Pausanias, read Polydamas. *

P. 182, line'20, Jor irpoaxtbfievoif read Trpo

P. 187, line 17, for " it is obvious " that, read " it is obvious that, etc.

Ibid. 20, for unable to act, read unable to act."

P. 203, line 24, for illusion, read allusion.

P. 204, line 16, for metapor, read metaphor.

P. 213, line 11, diiaKdOeiVf etc., add Schanz, note on Euthyphro, 15 d.

P. 221, line 35, for Morti, read Morte.

P. 227, line 5, for atomies, read anatomies.

P. 253, line 80, for mun. read num.

P. 265, line 2, for when one has. .living, read ' when, .living.'

P. 259, line 6, TpayipdoiroioL Add Schanz, Prolegg. ad. Symp. A§ 2.

P. 261, line 32, dKp6xo\oL. Add Schanz, Prolegg. ad. Qorg. A§ 1.

P. 287, line 16, for 6U\,¬IVj read dti\Ka,¬tv.

INTRODUCTION.

A, a_" Name and Aim of the Repvilic.

The artistic remains of classical antiquity which have been preserved to us are for the most part gems with- out their setting, statues torn from their shiine and pedestal, bare books without contemporary comment or introduction, or any external hint to tell when or why or how they were written. .

About such books it is possible to ask many questions, of which it has been well said, " It is right to ask them, but you must not expect an answer."

When and why were these books written ? Did their author produce them in youth or age, in the prime or in the decay of his powers ? Had they any special reference, purpose, or occasion, at the time be- yond the general meaning they seem to have now ?

And then there are yet further previous questions, as they may be called, which it is easy to ask. How do we know that these books are the work of their reputed author at all? May they not be clever forgeries, and if not altogether, yet in part ? Are there not many incongruities, inconsistencies, impossi- bihties contained in them?

Such doubts have a fascination. They are ghosts easy to raise, often very hard to lay. For in all

xiv Introduction.

questions of history and still more of language there is from the nature of the case a very large element of uncertainty, and so-called internal evidence is peculiarly ambiguous. And the more minutely the inquiry is made the greater usually will the uncertainty appear. For doubt seems to multij)ly with subdivision. A day is more difficult to fix upon than a year, a tense or a case than a word or phrase; and a difficulty once raised, it becomes necessary to establish the certainty of each link in a long chain.

Fortunately the scope of this series and work does not admit of our so increasing our own perplexities.

''Non ego cuncta meis complecti versibus opto." " Non hie te carmine ficto Atque per ambages et longa exorsa tenebo."

Our business is to take the Republic as we find it, undoubtedly one of the greatest monuments of the ancient world, perhaps the greatest single prose book of any age; for our purpose, undoubtedly Plato's masterpiece in style and thought.^

We venture to assume the authenticity and the unity of the Repubh'. We may be permitted to leave

^ ** Das Werk ist im kleinen eine Darstellung des gesammten Entwickelung'sganges von Platon.'' Teuffel, Uebersicht der Plat. Lit. p. 20. " There is no kind of Platonic excellence which is not represented in the Republic." MahafFy, Gk. Lit. vol. IL p. 195. See the whole accomit of Plato, an admir- able specimen of compendious yet duly proportioned and forcible criticism.

Introductioii. xv

Hermann ^ even a little summarily on one side when he asks us to consider whether the first book does not belong to the same era as the Lysis and Charmides, while the other books were written at various intervals, and not in the present order of sequence. ^

We may be allowed to refuse to discuss ^vith Schleiermacher whether the tenth book is or is not unnecessary and superfluous ; or with Morgenstem, whether the Eepublic was a reply to the Ecclesiazusae ^

^ It is true that there are breaks and apparent inconsistencies in the structure of the Republic. At the same time, the general artistic unity can hardly be denied. How in Plato's mind or manner of composition, or within what period of his life it "rounded to a perfect whole," is what we do not know. Like the Aeneid, it may have been worked at piecemeal.

^ Hermann, Geschichte der Flat. Phil.

' Morgenstern, Comm. I. Epimetron I. The date of the production of the Ecclesiazusae is itself uncertain. Morgen- stem puts it about the beginning of the 97th 01., A».e., 391 B. c. What the Ecclesiazusae does show is that the ideas of " ladies in Parliament," and of a community of goods, and even of a community of wives, was sufficiently notorious and popular at Athens to form the subject of a comedy, and were probably not confined to Plato or any one philosopher, but were in the air at the time. It must be admitted that the idea that the Ecclesiazusae was a critique on Plato is supported by the great names of Boeckh, Wolff, and Meineke. The fullest support of it is that attempted by Krohn, der Plat. Staat, chap. iii. He cannot be said to bring much proof. Cp. 452b and 457b with notes. The passage from the Ecclesiazusae, quoted on our fly-leaf, is striking but general.

xvi Introductioii.

of Aristophanes, or the Ecclesiazusae a critique upon the Republic.

We may be content to state a few broad truths and fixed facts which do not solve the question as to when and how the Republic was written, but with which every solution must harmoniza Such are these:

The internal evidence of style can tell us very little. How the Republic was published, how it was com- posed, whether it was actually written continuously all at one jet, or whether bit by bit at different times, we cannot say. We have no evidence. We cannot even say with Orelli that it was the work of Plato's prime, except in the sense that whenever Plato wrote the Republic he must have been in his prime. For great authors have written, or, at any rate, given to the world great works under every variety of circum- stance. Paradise Lost, as well as Paradise Regained, was the work of an old man, or rather it was the work both of youth and age. It was composed afber fifty, but was conceived at thirty-two.^ So again the two parts of Faust were produced at a wide intert-al of time.

The pretty story about the opening words of the Republic, even taken with the general statement of Dionysius of Halicamassus, only goes to prove that Plato was fastidious and careful in composition, and raises a presumption that the Republic, like most of Plato's writings, was kept long on the stocks.

Again, thq division into books is certainly not

^ See Pattison's Milton, p. 173, for some excellent remarks on this head.

Introduction. xvii

Platonic,^ and probably dates from the Alexandrine Age, and Aristophanes of Byzantium. If internal evidence proves anything it assuredly proves that neither the first two books, ^ as we have them, nor any others can be separated from each other or from the Eepublic generally.^

1 Cp. Christ. Plat. Stud., S. 22 ; Birt. Antike Buchw., 447.

^Such ingenious discoveries are not the peculiar achieve- ment of modem scholarship. Aulus Gellius, N. A. xiv. 3, preserves an ancient anticipation of them in the story that Plato and Xenophon being very insincere friends, or indeed covert enemies, when Plato had given to the world the first two books of the Republic, not necessarily the first two (lectis ex eo duobus fere libris, qui primi in vulgus exierant) Xenophon wrote the Cyropaedeia to refute them, to which hit Plato after- wards replied by saying that Cyrus was an energetic, vigorous character who had been badly educated. Krohn, however, naturally adopts this story as probable, der Plat. Staat, p. 73. Cp. p. 384. But even Hermann has called it a stupid story, and Cobet indirectly expresses the same condemnation. Prosop. Xen. p. 28. Cp. note by the poet Gray, vol. iv. (Gosse) p. 241.

3 We cannot, for instance, admit with Krohn (die Platon- ische Frage, Sendschreiben an Herm Prof. Dr. E. Zeller, Halle, 1878) that the whole present arrangement is an ab- surdity in itself, and that the probable order is bks. i.-iv. viii. -X., V. -vii., though we may admit that these are natural divisions if there be any of the Republic. The same critic considers the Republic Plato's earliest important work. Tennemann on the contrary says, "Die Biicher von der Republik und den Gesetzen sind die letzten Arbeiten des Plato. Hievon haben wir ausdriickliche Zeugnisse.'' Syst. Plat. Phil., vol. i. p. 116-125. On the general indivisibility cp. Schneider, Pref. xiv.

xviii titroduction.

We know for a fact that the Republic was written in connection with two other dialogues, the Timaeus and the Critias, with which it would form a Trilogy or artistic whole.

Again, the Republic cannot have been written after the Laws,^ in which moreover a certain senility of style is generally recognized.

An instance of a fixed fact is the mention of Ismenias of Thebes (p. 336 A. See note ad loc.), who, as we know from Xenophon, was killed B. c. 382, The Republic, or this part of it, cannot have been finally given to the world, and probably was not written, until after that date. The mention of Polydamas, who won his victory in 408 B. C., and Perdiccas, who died probably about 413 B. C., may also be noticed.

Of Plato's own life we know very little, and of this little a good deal, and that part especially which might throw light on this question, rests on dubious evidence, the evidence of the Seventh of the Letters which go by the name of Plato.

If we may believe this Epistle VII. to be genuine,^

^ Aristotle in fuct says as much. Ar. Pol. ii. 6. 1264b.

' If any of the Platonic Letters are genuine, the seventh is most probahly so, and critics like Morgenstem, Commen- tationis I., Epimetron, have pronounced this to be certainly genuine. It can, however, hardly be separated from the rest. See Jowett, Preface to second edition, pp. xix., xx. Curiously enough, while Jowett quotes Bentley in condemnation of ancient epistles generally, Bentley himself admitted the

Introduction. xix

it would, to some extent, confinn the presumption raised by the point just adduced. The writer of the letter says, in language which most strik- ingly resembles that of the Eepublic itself, that it was the death of Socrates which brought home to his mind the conviction that all the Greek States were hopelessly corrupt, and that there could be no chance of reform until the rulers should learn the true philosophy, until the philosopher should be king. i

The death of Socrates took place in B. C. 399, and for the next few years Plato was apparently travel- ling, ^ and did not settle down as a teacher at Athens until some four or perhaps twelve years later.

Platonic Epistles. Eemarks on a Late Discourse of Free- thinking, vol. . of Randolph's Encheiridion Theologicum, p. 253. For a favourable opinion see Grote; on the other side Karsten, Comm. Crit. de Plat, quae feruntur epistolis. The fact that this seventh letter is quoted by Cicero, Tusc. Disp. v. 35, puts it in quite a different category from such late forgeries as the letters of Phalaris.

^ KaKUP ovv ov XiJ^etv t4 dvOpiinriva yivrf^ irplv Ay ^ r6 tup ifnXocroipQv dpO&s yc Kal dXriOQi y^voi cli dpx^s ^X^ tAj xoXirturds 9j tG)v bvpaffTcvbvTvn' iv roiS irbXeaiv ( tivos fiolpai Oelas 6ptus

^ The whole question of the extent and the dates of Plato's travels is hopelessly complicated.

XX Introduction.

On the whole, then, we may be content to believe that the Republic was not published till after 382 B. c. ; that is, when Plato was in middle life, although the ground idea of the philosopher-king may have come into his mind with the death of his great master some fifteen years before. ^

Quite distinct from the real date of the Republic, the date, i. e. of its composition, is what may be called the ideal or dramatic date, the time at which the imaginary dialogue is supposed to have taken place. Beyond the general facts that of course this must be supposed to have been during the lifetime, of Socrates, and that the brothers of Plato, Glaucon and Adeimantus, are spoken of as being quite young, veavtat or veavia-Koi, we have perhaps no indications. ^ But, indeed, as Jowett well remarks, it is not necessary to discuss the questiouj for Plato aimed only at such general probability as may guard a writer of fiction against glaring inaccuracy or in- consistency artistically jarring, and cared as little whether the persons of his drama could have met in the flesh, as whether they did actually so meet^

^ Morgenstem, Epimetron, on the whole, puts the date at abont the end of the 97th Olympiad, i. e. 389 B. a

^ Cephalus died about 444 b. c.

^ Jowett, Introd.- p. 6. We need not, with Hermann, convert Plato's brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, into his uncles of the same name. lb is a question whether the

Introduction. xxi

It is for us, then, to take the Republic as we find it a_" the greatest of Plato's dialogues, because it is the most Platonic, because it exhibits best the peculiar merit of Plato, adequacy of style to subject, of manner to matter; because, while the matter is profoundly difficult and varied, the artistic handling, both as a whole and in detail, does not sink under this difficulty and variety, is not overlaid or - barrassed by it, but rises to it, is equal to it, and expresses and conveys it with the grace and ease of complete mastery.

X The matter of the Republic is great. Its scope is nothing less than the whole of life and its surround- ings in this world, aye, and in the other, beginning before the cradle, and extending beyond the grave.

How, placed as we are, shall we live best ? How

Olaucon and Adeimantus of the Parmenides are the same. Gr. V. Prinsterer thinks they are, p. 211. The mention of its being the first occasion of the celebration of the Bendideia, 327a, tells hardly anything, nor the fact that it was in the heat of summer, 350d. * Fictive Zeit des Gesprachs wahr- scheinlich 410 v. Chr. Boeckh. Vater, Munk, nach der Glaukons Gruppe : die Kephalosgruppe sprache eherfur . 430.' K. F. Hermann. *Lag aber Platon ferner, und konnte leichter anacronistisch gehalten werden.' Teuflfel, Uebersicht, p. 20. So, too, Gr. van Prinsterer, Prosopographia Plat. p. 112, discussing the point whether the Cephalus of the Republic is the same as that of the Parmenides, says, ' Cum in temporum notatione Plato solcat non diligentissime versarL * Cp. ibid, p. 212.

xxii Introduction.

are we to make the best of one or of both worlds ? What is right to do ? What is the most perfect state of human society and life we can imagine if our dreams could come true ? ^

This, under its many forms, and with all that it involves, is the grand question that is asked in the Republic as a practical question, and answered as a practical question, or if partly in dreaming, then with such dreams as are the inspiration of waking moments, when

" Tasks in hours of insight willed Can be through hours of gloom fulfilled.'*

For this is the secret of Plato, that he is a dreamer, but a dreamer who is also a man of the world who has known men and cities, kings and councils, and peoples.

^ And so he answers the question not simply or in the abstract, nor by telling us in a cut and dried formula what is the whole duty of man, but by giving a picture of a city, which is at first a city of men, and then becomes the city of God, is at first a possible Greek city, and then like that of the myth seems to rise above the ground and fade into the skies, or rather hang in a haze between heaven and earth, built as it is

" To music, therefore never built at all, And therefore built for ever."

Speaking more precisely, the exact terms of the

Introduction. xxiii

question and answer have been subjected from very ancient times to a good deal of discussion. ^

What is the name and aim of the Republic ? Are we to call the book the Republic, or rather the dis- cussion of Justice ?

The great manuscript of the Republic, the Paris A^ has this inscription a_"

X HAATfiNOC X nOAITEIAI HHEPIAIKAIOY

id est, HkoLTitivos TroAtTciat, rj wepl SiKaLov. Which name is the right one ? Are both right ?

The ancients^ themselves, from Aristotle to the Fathers, spoke of the Dialogues as IIoAtTciai, and do not mention the title ttc/oi SiKatov,

On the other hand Socrates distinctly states in the first book, and it is virtually reasserted more than once, that the question to be answered, and the object of search is, what is the nature of justice ? o to wpioTov

a,¬(rK07rOVfJLa,¬V, TO SlKaLOV O Tt TTOT fSTTlV. 354R

The great German scholars then have gone into two hostile camps over the issue whether the defining of Justice or the founding of an Ideal State is the real subject of the Republic.

And in this they were anticipated, as Proclus in his commentary tells us, by the ancients.

^ Aristotle speaks of it as irokiTeia^ so do Theophrastus hia pupil, and Dionysius of Halicamassus. In Latin, Cicero and Lactantius call it Eespublica.

xxiv Introduction.

** I seem to hear," says Proclus, " many disputing and supporting their own views."

The whole discussion which follows is extremely interesting, as showing how fully on such questions the ancient scholars anticipated modem methods of inquiry and reasoning.^

Space only permits us to give a brief summary of the arguments.

Those who say the subject is wepl 8iKaL0(rvvrjs allege

(1) That the first inquiry in the work, and the points with which Cephalus and Polemar- chus and Thrasymachus are concerned is, what is Justice, and who is the Just Man ?

(2) That the consideration of the Polity is introduced for the sake of Justice, and that we may be able to inspect it writ large.

(2) That Socrates is himself a witness, for he

cries again and again that the object is the

nature of Justice, and finally at the end he

bids us practise Justice.

On the other hand those who take the other side

have just as strong and convincing proofs that it is

the Republic.

(1) They admit that the first inquiry is directed to Justice, but that is only because it is a plausible and attractive way of begin- ning.

^ See note at end of this section.

Introduction. xxv

(2) They adduce the inscription, which is very old and not spurious. For Aristotle, they say, calls his epitome the epitome of the Republic, and so Theophrastus. Further, Plato's titles are of three kinds, (1) a,¬#c TT/ooo- wTTwv, from the characters, like the Alci- biades or Phaedo ; (2) a,¬k Trfi/otoraTiKwi/, from the circumstances, like the Symposium ; (3) wpayfmrtKaiy from the matter, as this Dia- logue the Republic is. Finally, they adduce the testimony of Plato himself, for (1) in the Laws, book 5, he calls the community of wives and children, ie., the Republic, the first pblity, that of the Laws itself the second ; and (2) in the Timaeus, Socrates in his recapitulation only enumerates

the TOTTOt 7roklTa,¬t(tiV,

In the sum, just as these disputants may be said to anticipate Morgenstem and Schleiermacher, so Proclus himself anticipates Professor Jowett in choosing a via media.

Such are the contentions of the parties. " I," says Proclus, " admit the arguments of both, and hold that there is no essential difference between them, but that the object is both the nature of the state and the nature of justice, not that there are two objects, however, for that is impossible."

" We shall, say then," he concludes, " that the tide irepl TToAtTctas is quite consonant with the inquiry into the nature of justice."

XXVI Introduction.

Cicero, incidentally, takes exactly the same view, for he remarks that Plato was seeking mores optimos et optimum rdpublicae statum, implying that the two are synon3rmous.

With these two ancient authorities then, and with Jowett, we may admit that the two, the quest after justice and the founding of the ideal state, are not two subjects but one, for justice is the " order of the state, and the state is the visible embodiment of justice, under the outlines of human society."

Plato insists, as Jowett well remarks, on restoring man to his natural condition, before he will answer the question, what is justice ? at alL

" Conduct," as we now all know, "is three-fourths of life," and of conduct and duty, three-fourths again is duty to our neighbour ; and when Plato answers the question, what is justice? what is a right action? he is acting only rightly and naturally and philosophic- ally, as well as in accordance with the sequence of Oreek ideas, in beginning with the state and going on to the individual.

But it should further be noticed that, as the second set of disputants in Proclus say, "Plato chooses the most plausible and attractive way of beginning. His method is the artistic rather than the scientific. He does not begin by asking the cut and dried question, what is justice ? or, what is an ideal state ? On the contrary, he seems to begin in a perfectly casual way^ and to be led by the haphazard turn of the argument.

Introduction. xxvii

"blowing like a wind whithersoever it listeth," to consider the definition of justice.

For justice first appears, apparently quite incident- ally, in Cephalus' account of a good life, av SiKoitos Kol o(ri

For the rest, the conception of an ideal state, a city of God, a city of the saints, a new Jerusalem, an Utopia, or even a model colony or community, is one which has, since Plato's time, fascinated many minds, which has had an incalculable effect on the en- thusiasm of mankind, and has been, perhaps, on& of the most fruitful springs of moral progress.

It is true that Plato, like other inventors, may have been, perhaps, anticipated in his idea.^ The restless Greek genius had, even before his days, tried various experiments in the organization of society upon a * new model'

^ Diog. Laert. iii. 37, preserves a atatement of one Aris- toxenus, that almost all the Republic had been written in the

** Contradictions " of Protagoras. But the statement is un- verifiable, and, as Stallbaum shows us, as it stands, is very ambiguous. Stallbaum, Pref. xlix.

xxviii Introduction.

Sparta was a living and, in Plato's time, an appar- ently only too successful example of a community founded and maintained on ideas, and that the Spartan system suggested much to Plato is obvious.^

Something, too, he may have borrowed from the semi^monastic and theocratic communities of greater Greece which ranged themselves under the mystic name of Pythagoras.

The historian, Theopompus, according to Athenaeus, xi. 508, actually accused Plato of having drawn a large number of his dialogues from one Bryson of Heraclea, and Stobaeus in his Florilegium, Ixxxv. 15, presents us with a fragment under the name of Bry- son, on the interdependence of human activities, which is decidedly Platonic in tone.^

Archytas of Tarentum, bom about 440 B. C., and thus a somewhat older contemporary of Plato, and

1 Cf. MahaflFy, Gk. Lit. ii. pp. 197, 199, et seqq., ** Plutarch tells us facts which show how easy the adoption of Plato's scheme might have been at Sparta. " With this compare the language of Rousseau, ** Quand on veut renvoyer au pays des chimeres on nomme Tinstitution de Platon. Si Lycurgue n'eUt mit la sienne que par 4crit, je la trouverais bien plus chim^rique. Platon n'a fait qu'^purer le coeur de I'homme ; Lycurgue I'a d^natur^." Emile, 1. i. Cp. Montesquieu de I'Esprit des Lois, 1. vii. ch. 16, ''Platon dont les institutions ne sont que la perfection des lois de Lycurgue."

2 Cp. the very curious fragment of the comic poet Ephippus. Comic * Attic' Fragg., Kock, 257, quoted iiifra, p. Ixv.

Introduction. xxix

an acquaintance of his, may, perhaps, also lay claim to somie measure of anticipation of, or participation in Plato's communistic ideas, (See the fragments pre- served by Stobaeus under his name.)

A far more important personage, however, than these two is Hippodamus. The fragments of his writings given by Stobaeus, Flor. 43, 92, 93, 94, 98, etc., may or may not be genuine. But we know him, on the undoubted testimony of Aristotle, to have been a publicist and political economist of the first order, i He was the Haussmann of the Piraeus, ^ the Wake- field of the model colony of Thurii, sent out by Athens to Italy, and he afterwards built Rhodes. He was the first, says Aristotle, twv firf TroAtTcuo/ici/wv, to set himself to describe an ideal constitution, and his ideas are strangely coincident with those of the Re- public. His State was to comprise 10,000 citizens ; it was to be divided into three parts a_" the artisans, the husbandmen, and the military guardians, to wpoTTokefiovv Kttt Tot oTrAtt a,¬;(oi/. The land was also to be divided into three parts a_" the sacred, the public, and the private a_" the first devoted to the maintenance of religion, the second to the support of the military

^ M. Espinas defends them, as against Schneider, briefly but with effect. Bepnblique de Platon, livre viii., par Alfred Espinas, Paris, 1881.

' Aristotle, Pol. ii. 8. The whole account and Aristotle's objections should be compared with the Republic and Aris- totle's criticisms on that.

e

XXX Introduction.

class, the third alone to be the property of the hus- bandmen.

Besides these theorists in politics, Aristotle implies there were many more, and, indeed, dwells at some length on the ideas of Phaleas of Chalcedon, the first to propose an equalization of property.^

Thus the Kepublic of Plato may have seemed at the time of its writing to be by no means without precedent or parallel, and to be even in its entirety far more a practical possibility than it has often been deemed since.

That time was one, it should be remembered, for desperate remedies a_" a time such as to give even a pathetic interest to Plato's proposals, if we imagine them to have been seriously and practically meant. For Plato's lot was cast in the days of the political collapse of Athens. It is possible we may exaggerate too much the consciousness of the Athenians in the early half of the fourth century, of the downfall which had already overtaken their city, and of the long and slow decline of life and freedom which lay before her. But after Sicily and Aegospotami, after the Four Hundred, the Thirty, and the Ten, when half the friends of his youth had found death sharp and s^vift in the agony of the Great Harbour or the crimson eddies of the Assinarus, or slow and lingering in the stone quarries of Syracuse, and half of those that still re-

^ We do not, however, know enough of Phaleas to call him a forerunner of Plato.

Introduction. xxxi

mained had fallen in civil war or proscription, when his own adored master had been made the victim of brutal spite and judicial murder, when justice seemed to have fled the earth, Plato himself, and many with him, must have felt that the times were out of joint, and that Society was only to be rehabilitated by an entire reconstitution, by heroic treatment, and divine good fortune. ^

Did Plato then really mean his ideal State as a practical solution of the diflSculties he saw around him ? Did he intend it should be capable of realiza- tion ? and, further, is it so in point of fact ?

The answer naturally turns on a question of degree. Up to a certain point Plato's State is, and is spoken of, as practicable, as indeed a Greek city, differing in some points, but not vitally or in kind, from other Greek cities.

It is to be a Greek city. Tt 8k S-; a,¬(frj, ^v a-v woktv oiKt^iEts, ovx ^EWrjvls ccrrat; Act y avrrfv, ^k^tj, 470 E.

It is to be within the Hellenic comity ; it is, what is most significant, to recognize the spiritual supremacy of Delphi.

Nor is there at first any difficulty about this. The

^ Compare the famous passage already alluded to, from the seventh of the Platonic Epistles, which, whether Platonic or not, feels acutely and expresses aptly the situation of Plato. A£p. 7, 325 D. F., 326 a., esp. the last, /ca/cci)s avfiiroUrat TroXiretfOvrai {aX vvv 7r6XA«s) ra ydip tGv vdfjuav airrCav

xxxii Introduction.

foundation of classes or castes, the equal education of both sexes, the military training and functions assigned to women, these, we have seen, would not offer any insuperable objection to a Greek mind. And so Plato does not think it necessary to offer much apology for their introduction, and they are received by Glaucon and Adeimantus as they would be received by open- minded contemporaries, with a playftil affectation of surprise and some criticism, but not with incredulity or astonishment.

It is when the two great social revolutions, the two oints of communism, the community of property and he community of wives, are proposed that the real ifficulty begins.

Here Plato himself finds it necessary to apologize ; fcnd these are the points on which all critics, beginning with Aristotle,^ have fastened. )

X Did Plato then really intend this communism as k practical proposal a_" a practical panacea for human ills]

Aristotle seems to have understood him to do so ; and he himself seems to speak of his own state in its ^ At the same time, more suo, he introduces it apparently in the most casual way, making it grow out of an apparently haphazard quotation of /cot^d rd r&v ^\uv. '

2 Or perhaps we ought to say, beginning with Plato himself, a- in the Laws (see esp. p. 739), where he makes & jactura of the community of wives, and the government by philosophers, as too purely ideal and impossible of realization here below. See also Jowett's Introduction to the Laws, part v.

Introduction. xxxiii

fullest and furthest development as possible, though only very distantly so.

His attitude is at first that which he himself describes as ike attitude of those lazy day dreamers, who would rather not tire themselves about possi- bilities, but assume that what they desire is already theirs, and pursue their plan, and delight in detailing what they are going to do when their wish has come true (p. 458). Then, he says, it is possible, if one change is possible, which change is indeed possible, though not a slight or easy one.

It is possible if the philosopher-king should arise

(p. 473). And this he repeats with even more emphasjjr in that most beautiful passage in the sixth book. j ^ 'a_¢' Whenever and wherever in the countless ages o ijhe past, or even now, in some foreign clime beyouj^^ )ur ken, the philosopher has been, or even now, is King, there is our state realized.'' a_¢ There is no impossibility in all this. The difficulty of it is not denied (p. 499).

But Plato's last word is more ambiguous and puts the question in another aspect, or, as Jowett most beautifully has it, "The higher light of philosophy breaks through the regularity of the Hellenic temple, which at last fades away into the heavens."

" Whether our state exists," says Plato, " or ever will exist in fact, is no matter. In heaven there is laid up a pattern of it, which he who desires may behold, and beholding may set his house in order. He who

xxxiv Introduction.

lives aright will live after the manner of that city, having nothing to do with any other " (p. 592b).

The kingdom of God is within you; the New Jerusalem is a city in the heavens.

So Plato leaves us, gazing into the skies, our eyes fixed on " vacant forms of light." ^ What, we ask, returning to the world and to our- selves, has he taught us ? What is Plato's contribution in the Republic to the science and practice of politics, to the knowledge and the morality of mankind ? The answer is in his own language, that he has, if we have listened to him, " converted us," converted the eye of our souls. ^'

Plato did not regenerate Syracuse, or his own Athens. He does not appear to have been wanting in the courage or the will to do as well as to think ; but he cannot be said to have succeeded in action. He failed where other brave and wise men failed, and more ignominiously than many.

Not to despair of the state, to use existing mstitu- tions and weapons, to fight a good fight for freedom, and, failing, to die in harness, this is the glory of Demosthenes and not of Plato. His title to immortality is very different. It is to have declared not to Athens Only, but to all ages and countries a secret of political and social regeneration, the value of ideals.

The Republic was never realized. It never became a working model, a living city. To make it such has never been attempted except by dreamers and

Introduction. xxxv

somnambulists at second hand in an age of mystic- ism and social disintegration. ^

To some of its ideas it may be said that in the course of ages approximation has been made : others may yet, "one or two thousand years hence," be realized.

But, meanwhile, the idealism of Plato has once and again renewed the youth of the world.

There is, of course, a wrong and a right use of ideal speculation. Englishmen, at any rate, do not require to be told that " an oxmce of practice is worth a pound of theory." But equally does all practice require constant revision, or it degenerates into routine.

The world is steeped in custom. The wonder is; Mr. Bagehot tells us, first, that primitive society should ever have attained custom; but next, that having attained custom, men should ever break from it again. Nor did they break from it for ages. We have only to think of the long process of human history during what may be called the period of recorded or semi-

^ Porphyry, in his life of Plotinus, c. 12, says that Plotinus, being a favourite with the Emperor Gallienus and his wife, used his influence to obtain a concession of a certain city in Campania which had once been founded a^ a city of philo- sophers but was now in ruins, along with its adjoining territory. He proposed to restore it under the name of Platonopolis, and that its inhabitants should adopt the laws of Plato. The experiment, however, was apparently not made, though it would not, perhaps, have been more physically im- possible than Salt Lake City or Oneida Creek.

xxxvi Introduction.

recorded civilization a_" a short time, a very short time it may be to the geologist, but long enough, we might imagine, to have changed human nature far more than it has been changed. We ourselves are living in peculiar times. The great material changes, the entire revolution which our enormously enlarged command of physical forces, as well as the expanded scope of our scientific vision and imagination has worked for us, these have reacted on our whole mental and moral attitude. Yet, even into our day, how much, how large a part of the tradition and custom of antiquity has lasted on. In art, in law, in education, in religion, how slowly do convention, prescription, and prejudice die.

To young minds, indeed, entering upon life there often, and perhaps usually, comes a period when uni- versal questioning and revision is natural. But in after life, the weeds, which are the cares of the world, choke this seed of youth. Immersed in routine, busy every hour and every moment in working some established system, most men have neither time nor superfluous energy to ask the previous question a_" whether such a system is the best, or is good at all, much less to travel beyond their own sphere, and reconsider the bases of society, or the wide relations of man to men, or to God.

Yet something of our youth we should always struggle to retain : we should keep the freshness, the fancy, the generous enthusiasm, which is ready to

Introduction. xxxvii

receive and consider new ideas. Nowhere shall we find a stronger stimulus to this, a truer elixir, than in Plato.

We should each of us build an ideal city of our own, and frame some outline of a perfect society^

What, we should ask, are the chief faults of our own time and country, of society at large around us, of ourselves ? How could they be removed 1 What is the best state we can imagine ? What is our ideal of a city, a church, a college, a school, a family, a pro- fession, a life, and how are they to be realized ?

Much there may be in Plato's speculation that seems quite impracticable, the extravagance, the fancy of a dreamer, much of " sweet impossible coun- sels," but if we have learned, if we are stimulated by reading him only to ask these questions, we shall have learned half the lesson of Plato and the Ee- public, and a half perhaps greater than the whole. /^We may, however, if we will, learn the whole too. The question which is asked in the Eepublic is answered, though not perhaps in the way we should expect. Do we still inquire what in so many words is justice, what is duty, what is the great secret on which society is to be reorganized, by which the ideal state is to be founded and maintained ? Plato has an answer for us, although it is not some grand or great thing, but something very simple, at first sight it may be disappointingly simple.

" We have had our eyes fixed on the far horizon, expecting justice to dawn in the distant skies, and all

xxxviii Introduction.

the while she has lain ' tumbling about at our feet ' "

(432d). We have had her in our hands and on our lips, our ears have heard the sound of her, but we have missed her. What is she then 1 What is the answer to the question with which we started, to SiKaiov o rC ttot' icrrcv 1 Simply this a_" That each vnan should mind his own biisinesSy and not meddle with that of another, " This, or something like this, is justice a_" that each man should perform some one single task of those required in social life, namely, the one for which his nature is most fitted" (433a). Justice is olKeiorrpayca ; Injustice is iroXvirpayfioa-vvrf,

" One man, one trade," as we may paraphrase it, is Plato's principle in Political Economy ; and in Politi- cal Economy, not only in the restricted sense it sometimes wears, but in its truest and widest mean- ing, that of the whole economy or ordering of the state and of the individual. (See 369b and D, and 444c, with notes.)

That all life, in proportion to its civilization, is based on a division of labour is no new discovery. Plato does not take to himself the credit of mak- ing it, but only of giving it a new application. And herein indeed lies his real achievement and the true secret of the Eepublic. For, if we follow out the application, we shall find that, like that other trifling matter of which he speiJcs, (to

Introduction. xxxix

and embraces things human and divine. The prin- ciple of Order is as far- reaching as that of Number. It is both destructive and constructive. It gives the contradiction to not a few famous theories of morals and politics. Men are not bom equal, whatever may be asserted by philosophic and political documents of high and sounding name. That is to say, they are not bom equal in the sense of being bom alike. They are bom diverse, and they become, and ought to become, more and more so. But they are equal in that they all have their place and part in the whole. No one, if society is rightly organized, can be indifferent to another. How is it then to be rightly organized ? By Justice, is Plato's answer. That is by order ; that is, it must be organized not as a dead level, but as a hierarchy ; not as a mob, but as a body politic. This, and this alone, is the principle by which society will find its tme equilibrium. Tried by it, tyrant and leveller are alike condemned. It alone can reconcile hero worship and the passion for freedom a_" the con- flicting divine rights of king and people. It alone can combine and supersede oligarchy and democracy in a higher and better constitution. For the best constitution is that which is most united, and the most united is that which is most sympathetically interdependent.

"The eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee. . . . God hath tempered the body together, that, whether one member suffer, all the

xl Introduction.

members suffer with it ; or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it" (Ep. ad Cor. 1. xii. 21 and 24).

" That city is best governed which comes nearest to a single individual ; where, when for instance, as in one of us, a finger is hurt, the whole community, which extends through the body up to the soul, and forms one constitution under the ruling principle, feels the hurt, and when a part is affected, the whole sym- pathizes " (Republic 463d).

It is not a mere coincidence that the language of Plato, as to the secret of an ideal society, is identical with that of St. Paul ; for the truth is, afi Plato shows us, that one principle extends throughout the whole uni- verse. The homely saw ne autor supra crepidam is but a special application of the wider maxim a_" Order is heaven's first law;^ or, as one of our own poets also can sing addressing Duty a_"

** Thou dost preserve the Stars from wrong , And the Eternal Heavens, through thee, are fresh and strong."

The law of the physical and industrial wprld is the law of the political and moral, and also of the intel- lectual and spiritual. This is the sum and the sub- stance of the Republic.

U43c.

Introduction. xli

Prodtis.

The passage in Proclus' commentaries of which I have given an analysis is taken from the 'TtrofivijfMTa Ilp6K\ov els t^v HoKiTdav appended to the famous Basle Plato, pub. 1534, p. 349 et seqq. It is very much to be wished that a complete and uniform edition of these unequal but often very valuable commentaries of Proclus on the Republic should be under- taken. The recent volume of Rudolf Schoell, Procli Com- mentariorum in Rempublicam Platonis Partes Ineditae, Berlin, 1886, is a promising instalment. Should time ever permit, and should not (what I would rather see) some learned and leisured scholar anticipate, I should hope myself some

(lay to fill this gap. It is interesting to me to discover and to repeat that the Basle editor of these fragments states in his preface that he was indebted for the use of the MSS. which contained them to the ** great humanity " of a pre- decessor of mine, John Claymond, President and Benefactor of my own coUege, and first President of its distiDguished colony the college of Corpus ChristL

xlii Introduction.

B. a_" The Si/stem of Education in the Republic.'^

'* Voulez vous prendre une idee de Viditcationpuhlique? Lisez la R&p^ibligue de Plaion. Ce n^est point un ouvrage de politique conime le pensent ceux qui ne jugent des Hires que par leur litres, Cest le plus beau traiti d^tducafion qu^mi a jamais fait,"

These striking words, striking alike in their positive and their negative dogmatism, occur in the opening pages of one of the most famous and would- be original of modern works on education a_" the Emile of Eousseau,

It is a remarkable testimony to the permanent power and recurrent influence of the Greek classics that the " return to nature " in education a_" for such Rousseau professed to be his secret and aim a_" should

*0n the subject of Greek education generally, even the most indolent beginner or general reader should consult Professor Mahaffy's volume in the Educational Series, perhaps the most lively and readable of his many readable and lively books. Professor Mahaffy is specially happy, as he is specially qualified to be, on the subject both of yvfutacTiK-fj and of fiovcriKT^ in the sense of music.

A really useful compendium will be found in an Oxford Prize Essay by Mr. Walter Hobhouse, of Hertford College, Chancellor's English Essay, 1883, on the Theory and Practice of Education.

Of the education in the Republic viewed rather in the light of its connexion with Plato's Philosophy, the fullest and best treatment is that In Mr. R. L. Nettleship's essay in the volume Hellenica.

Introduction. xliii

mean a return to Piato. Whether, however, the actual terms in which the tribute of imitation is

'* offered would have been agreeable to the great master, may be doubted. That an original and eccentric genius, 2000 years after his day, should call the Republic the finest treatise on education ever written, might flatter the shade even of the calm " spectator of all time and all existence." But when

* the same authority went, on to say that the best of educational treatises was not a work on politics, Plato would reply that this is impossible, for that the two are inseparable.

I The Eepublic is, first and foremost, a work on /Politics, but it is also an educational treatise just as

^jit is an ethical treatise, because it is political in the fullest, in the true Greek sense, because it treats of civilized and educated life and of such life as it is alone possible, that is, in a society or iroXis.

To Plato as to many minds, especially at the present

(lay, the hope of the world seems to hang on educa- tion. In practical politics, says Plato, little reform is possible. Government by the majority is the rule ;

^ and the majority, that arch-sophist, corrupts us all. Fashion sways everything. How are we to change, to *' educate " fashion, to create an inner law which will make ftien resist her dictates 1 Only by seizing on the child in his tender years when his soul is fresh J and unsophisticated, generous, and open to impression.

" Then, if you can sufficiently imbue him with ideals.

xliv Introduotion.

there is some chance that in the world he will resist fashion^ and by resisting her create new standards. It follows that an ideal state must have its basis in an ideal education, and Plato has no sooner started his state as a civilized community, and not a mere city of two-legged swine, than he turns to consider the ques- tion of education.

The transition is made, it is true, more Platonico, in an apparently unintentional and haphazard way, being introduced by the casual comparison of the ffivkci^ to the a-KvXa^f of the guardian to the well- trained watch-dog ; but this mode of the^ transition must not disguise from us its vital importance.^

With regard to the actual character of the ideal education thus introduced, we should remark that it falls naturally into two divisions corresponding curious- ly to the condition of things in Greece at Plato's own time. Then, as now, two rival systems of education were recognized : the one, old- fashioned, simple, con- ventional, " liberal and classical " ; the other, modern, advanced, philosophical, scientific.

The first, the old Greek education, the iyKVKkios iraiSeia, as it was afterwards called, consisted of two parts, yvfivaarriKrj and ftowtKiJ, or more strictly fiova-iK'/j in the narrower sense- of music, together with ypdfifjjara or letters a_" it was, in other words, the train- ing which in good old-fashioned days English parents gave their boys, classics and athletics, together with ^ Cp. supra, p. xxi.

Introduction. xiv

that which they gave their girls, music and deport- ment.

What is chiefly noticeable about it is that it was a training of the body as much as of the mind, a train- ing in accomplishments as much as in knowledge, and that it was^s we have called it, _a liberal and classical educatioi^ - essentially liberal in that it was not m- tended th\rfi

What in the best days it was really like^imy best be gathered from the well- known picture in the Clouds of Aristophanes, where in contrast to the musty laboratory and fusty professors of the new learning, is given us the never- to-be-forgotten glimpse of the gardens of the Academe, those " playing fields " of the Athenian boy, where, as people of the old school fondly told, the victory of Marathon was won.^

Such was the old Athenian education, and such in the earlier books of the Eepublic is that which Plato gives his ideal state. He practically adds nothing, indeed he rather takes away, for he would expurgate both his classics and his music.

" Wliat then shall he our education ? or is it hard to invent a better than has been discovered by the wisdom of

^ Ar. Nub. 986 and 1005 et s&jq. d

xlvi Introduction.

t/!

\A

ages, I mean the education of gymnastic for the body, and musk for ths soid?" Eep. 376e. Enlarging from this beginning, Plato developes his first and simpler system of education in the early books of the Republic. Plato's education too is liberal and classical; the nly professions it contemplates are those of the statesman, the soldier, and the gentleman. Even more than the old Greek education it is addressed rather to the heart than to the head, to developing character as much as talent. Its central point is what may be called, by an extension of Plato's own language, the KaXri Pordvq,^ the sweet and wholesome pasture, with

^ h Kaicy ^ordviQ (401c).

The English educationalist may be reminded of the playing fields of Eton, at which we have already hinted, the meads of Winchester, the close of Rugby, the * wholesome and plea- sant pastures ' of many another of our public schools. An Oxford man may perhaps recall the truly Platonic language of Mr. Matthew Arnold in the preface to the Essays in Criticism on his own Academe, that Oxford "which by her ineffable charm keeps ever calling us nearer to the true goal of all of us, to the ideal, to perfection, to beauty in a word, which is only truth seen from another side, nearer perhaps than all the science of Tubingen."

A striking recognition of the same element in English education at Oxford and Cambridge will be found in a remark- able lecture, by Germany's greatest man of science, Helm- holtz, Die akademische Freiheit der deutschen Universit'aten

(Berlin, 1878) a_" "Zweitens sorgen die englischen Univer- sitaten, wie ihre Schulen, viel besser fur das korperliche Wohl ihrer Studirenden" . s. . (p. 13).

On the point of the connexion of the rmiui sana with the

Introduction. xlvii

its paradisal air of good influences, the waft of which steals health-laden upon the tender youthful soul, and wins it imperceptihly to love and he conformed to, and to live in harmony with all the beauty of reason,

(401b, etc.). For this, he says more soberly, is the real advantage of the musical education, not that it gives any knowledge or teaches any new facts, but that it touches the heart, and * penetrates into the recesses of the soul and fills it with harmony and moulds it to grace, and gives to th^oung character an instinctive unreasoning love for the good and beautiful, even before the boy can reason about such things, so that later on, when reason comes, he salutes her as a friend with whom knowledge has long made him familiar/

corpus sanum it may further be noted that Plato would appear to have given special attention to the relation of gymnastic and medicine.

It is not generally known how close is Plato's accord with, and how great therefore probably his debt to that still im- perfectly appreciated genius Hippocrates. Plato's language about the relation of training to health is, as Galen in his work on the same subject says, little more than a reproduc- tion of Hippocrates a_" d^\os ovv i^ airdvTdn/ 6 UXdrtav ftrrtv t^v 'ImroiqpdTow &Kpi^(a$

The whole subject of the relation of Plato's ideas to those of Hippocrates is treated in a modest and useful monograph, Die Platonischen Dialoge in ihrem Yerhaltnisse zu den Hippocratischen Schriften : Poschenrieder, Landshut, 1882.

K

xlviii Introduction.

The principle which pervades this passage, and which is thus broadly stated, is carried by Plato into all the details of his earlier education. Character, and not knowledge, is its object everywhere. It consists, we saw, of two parts, gymnastic and music. In treating of gymnastic Plato dwells not so much on its purely physical as on its moral effects. It is recommended not merely, and indeed not so much, because it renders the body active and apt for physical exercise, or because it keeps it in health, as because it produces a type of character, brave, enduring, and hard, and is the complement to the enervating influence of music used alone or injudiciously.

Music again, in both senses, whether music proper or literature, is to be considered in the same way. Following Plato's own order and considering literature, first, we find that his principle appears in the relation he defines between fact and fiction, and in the treatment of theology, into which he diverges,

Plato does not prefer fact to fiction. The true is the good ; what is not good cannot be true. It can- not be true in theology; and were it ever so true in history it must be suppressed, it must not be taught.

In this point modem feelings and tendencies seem to be in strong contrast with the ideas of Plato* The scientific spirit invading the nursery and the school- room proclaims that fact is everything. Fairy tales are pretty, but there are no such things as fairies; and the history of our childhood, Alfred and the Cakes,

Introduction. xlix

Cafiute and the Sea Waves, William Tell, Arnold von Winkelried, the history of Ivanhoe, and the history of Shakespeare's plays fires childish or boyish imagination and enthusiasm, but it must be swept away, for it is not true, and nothing like it ever took place, In its stead must be put a history embodying the latest lights, the newest views, the most correct spelling.^

The Greeks of Plato's day, as Thucydides himself saw, had no body of exact history lying behind them. The traditions of the past were inseparable from mythology, and from a mythology which had not it- self beqome fixed, dogmatic and official, but which

^ Much of this pedagogic pedantry supposes itself derived from Germany, and plumes itself on its. derivation. But what says the greatest of Germans ? He is singularly in accord with Plato. ,

" Till lately the world believed in the heroism of a Lucretia, of a Mucius Scaevola,. and suffered itself by this belief to be warmed and inspired. But now comes your historical criticism, and says that these persons never lived, but are to be regarded as fables and fiction divined by the great mind of the Romans. What are we to do with so pitiful a truth ? If the Romans were great enough to invent such stories, we should at least bo great enough to believe them." Eckermann, Con- versations of Goethe, p. 270, Oxenford's transl.

**Here again," continued Goethe, "the Greeks were so great that they regarded fidelity to historic facts less than the treatment of them by the poet." Ibid, p. 353.

Some beautiful remarks on the same subject will also be found in Sir Philip Sidney's Defense of Poesy.

1 Introduction.

lent itself naturally to the genius of the race that had created and might still create it ; a mythology, in other words, which was still very largely what the Greek poets might choose to make it.

Plato could therefore treat history, and still more religion, from its historical side in a very different way from what is now possible. If history is *' a lie men have agreed to believe," the Greeks had not so far agreed to believe one lie about the past, or else the circumstances of the lie were not so many and so plausible that they could not equally well agree to believe another And so fiction is not so much put on a par with fact by Plato as preferred before it. What may be called poetic truth,^ like poetic justice, ideal truth that is to say, is Plato's aim. Truth which is not poetic, truth in detail which is in conflict with great and broad truth, or seems to be so, is to Plato at any rate not the truth for children, or for education. It is more true, he would say, that God is good and can never be at all bad than that any fact in the Hellenic Hagiology ever had a historic existence.

" Those who go about telling stories, however well vouched for by priests or sacred writings, which show the gods doing or becoming anything mean or base or sinful, should beware lest they blaspheme against

^ Cp. the well-known language of Aristotle, Poetics, 1461, /, dib Kal^L\o(ro

yjyei.

Introduction. H

heaven and at the same time make cowards of their children."

With music proper the principle is the same a_" not any consideration of " art for art's sake," not the scientifically correct, not the esoteric appreciation of the few who can distinguish intervals inaudible to the multitude, not the dictum of the specialists is to give the law to us, but rather the plain broad consideration, what music produces a healthy moral fibre, a harmon- ized strength of character,^ music like that of which the poet sings, that raised

To higlith of noblest temper heroes old Arming to battle, and, instead of rage, Deliberate valour breathed, firm and unmoved By dread of death, to light or foul retreat.

Par. Lost, i. 550.

This is then the secret, the justification, of Plato's entire treatment both of science and of art.

The censorship he proposes to exercise over either , seems artificial and arbitrary, narrow and cramping to a degree. How, it is asked, can a mind which more than any other in ancient times, perhaps in any age. combined the artistic with the scientific sensibility, propose to put these fetters upon genius 1

The answer is, that in Plato's eyes neither art nor

^ Aristotle, whose sketch of a System of Education in the Politics is little more than a redaction of Plato's, says the same thing, iroiol rives rk ifOrj yiyv6fia,¬$a dC avTrjs, 1340, See bk; V. ch. 5, the whole passage.

lii Introduction.

science is to be considered apart from the whole of humanity.

. It may be that the world is best served nowadays by treating them as though they were ; it may be that in this enormous complexity: of knowledge and recorded fact which surrounds us to-day, truth in detiail, exhaustive accuracy alone can enable us to rise to the higher height, the truer truth, the more real good, to which Plato endeavoured by an apparently shorter cut to lead his own age.

But at least we should take care to keep the con- ception of the whole before our minds, and in educa- tion at any rate where selection has to be made, the only real principle of proportion is to be found here ; and if our alphabet of knowledge, if our everyday child's curriculum are to Plato's as twenty to one, the crown and cope of all must be worthy of the base so many times multiplied and enlarged.

To return, however, to Plato's earlier education, what is most striking in it is its marvellous, its apparently childish simplicity. What standard, we

*can imagine a modern school board inspector inquir- ing, what standard will Plato^ children attain? What does he actually teach his children to know 1 A little reading, some pretty stories with a good moral, a little poetry for repetition, a few tunes, the rest is good manners, gymnastics, and play.

We hear nothing at present of foreign languages, living or dead a_" the fortunate Greek had none between

Introduction. liii

him and literature,^ a_" nothing of history, nothing of grammar, of geography, of mathematics, of natural science.

So far the " finest educational treatise the world has seen " says nothing of either technical or scientific education, those two great names which are so much with the education of to-day. The second defect is indeed to be supplied farther on ; but as to the first, namely, technical education, Plato remains silent. In modern times its shadow is over all, and even classical education may be said to have become partially technical, compHcated as it is with the vast system of competition for money prizes.

Bread-studies, as they are sometimes called,, are not the concern Plato seems to think of a legislator. They will take care of themselves. If you want to learn a useful mechanical art, he would probably say, it must be learned not at school, but by actual experience and apprenticeship. This is how potters and all other handicraftsmen are trained (p. 467a).

A scientific education Plato does to some extent provide for later on. And herein his later system corresponds to that second phase of actual Greek edu- cation to which we alluded just now. For the want of a further and more scientific education had almost a generation before Plato's time come to be recog-

^ The example of Greek education and Greek literature is so far in favour of a greater use in teaching of our own language.

liv Introduction.

nized in Greece. Indeed, to supply this want was the main effort of the age immediately pre- ceding Plato, the age, as it is called, of the Sophists. The name of Sophist, in its origin a term of admiration, had like that of Professor, the modern title which most nearly covers the same area, in common acceptance been unfairly identified with its most imfortunate associations; but was in truth a word of very varied meaning and application, denoting at different times every grade between a savant and a quack, and being bestowed equally for good and for bad upon poets, lawgivers, rhetoricians and philo- sophers, and professors of mathematics and of medi- cine.

In the nature of things, it included more second- hand than first-hand thinkers, and was especially applied to those who popularized rather than to those who made new discoveries. But the "age of the Sophists " was a genuine age of new learning, and the work of the majority of the Sophists was to introduce this new learning into education. Men as different as Euripides and Isocrates, Gorgias and Protagoras, Meton and Hippocrates, Anaxagoras and Socrates himself, contributed in different ways to a common result, and, as so often happens, the paradoxes of one generation became the text-books of the next, and when the storm of resistance and indignation which the novelty of these ideas even in the best hands, as well as the crudity and shallowness of the travesty

Introduction. Iv

and misuse of them by inferior and mercenary teachers, aroused in Athens, had at length subsided, when the comedy of the Clouds and the tragedy of the Apology had both been played out and both become historic, the influence of the Sophists remained in the wider curriculum of Greek education.^

And it remained in Plato, who, though he made the style of Sophist a byword and gibbets Thrasymachus in the dialogue before us, owed an immense debt to the Sophists himself. For Plato recognizes the prin- ciple first preached by the Sophists that for public life some further training is necessary than poetry for repetition, a few tunes, and some gymnastic exercises^ and, indeed, that more than this is needed even for a really liberal education which is to develope all the . powers of the mind.

This further education, however, is not to be at all technical : aire yap re^vai pdvava-ol ttov avcuraL eSo^av eTvai (p. 522). It is to be strictly scientific. Yet here again, if we come to Plato with modem notions, we shall perhaps be disappointed. Scientific educa-i/ cation with Plato does not mean primarily chemistry and anatomy, geology and botany. Such applied or material science Socrates and Plato after him con- siders as of very secondary importance, and indeed as largely base, mechanical, and technical.

^ It is especially interesting and instructive on this head to compare the two speeches of Isocrates, written at an inter\^al of 35 years, the icari Xo^nartaVy and the irepl ^Avriddceus.

Ivi Introduction.

Plato's scientific education is, as he says, at first sight a very little thing, to

Finally, these studies are all to be ancillary to tlu? great educational agent, the science or pursuit of which is really to liberalize the mind, namely, Dialectic.

To explain what is really meant by Dialectic would involve a somewhat lengthy discussion, and belongs to a consideration of the last rather than the first five books of the Republic.

It may suffice to quote the admirable words of Professor Jowett's Introductiona_"

"There seem to be two great aims in the philo- sophy of Plato, first to realize abstractions, secondly, to connect them. '^According to him, the true education is that which draws men from be- coming to being, and to a comprehensive survey of all being." '

Yet it may be feared that this enigmatical defini- ^ tion will prove rather a hard saying to many now- adays who would seek in Plato the .*^ finest educa- tional treatise the world has seen.*'

In Dialectic then Plato's curriculum culminates. Beginning with stories told to children, it ends in a comprehensive survey of all being.

Introduction. Ivii

It remains to say a word as to the order and con- nexion in time in which this cuiricuhim is to be

^ followed.

Plato, as his fashion is, does not set this out in a very hard and fast way. It has to be gathered

' generally from general remarks and incidental allu- sions. As a rule, he says, philosophy is now studied ] in early youth, perhaps carried on for a time in the

^ intervals of money-making or house-keeping (p. 498). '* Those who study it do but make an approach to the most difficult branch of the subject, i, e., dialectic, perhaps in after-life as a very fine thing to do, being

(][uite a Vork of supererogation (wdpcpyov oloiievoi avTo Selv TrpaTTctv), they drop in to hear a discussion

at a friend's, but by and by they don't care even to do that, their sun goes out, not; as science tells of the orb of day, to be excited again to fresh activity, but in an absolute eclipse, never to be relumed."

. The real course ought to be just the opposite. Childhood and youth are not the seasons for the serious and difficult study of philosophy, but only for a beginning of it fitted for childhood and youth.

"*' At this period their bodies rather should be taken care of, to be the future servants of philosophy! Then as the young man advances to maturity he should increase the gymnastics of the soul. Finally, when their strength fails, and they are past duty, let our citizens range at will, and let them do noth-

i ing else except as by-play, for we intend them to

y

Iviii Introduction.

live happily here, and, tliis life over, to have similar happiness in another.

Such is the general sketch of the plan of education and intellectual life in the sixth book. Next follows as a necessary prolegomenon an account of the nature of knowledge which addresses itself to showing what this dialectic really is in which education is to cul- minate.

The general plan is then ratified by the famous figure or parable of the cave. Education really con- ^sists, this parable tells us, in conversion, in bringing the soul up to light, and teaching it to see things as they really are. He who is thus converted 'must not however remain for ever in the light, fancying that he has reached heaven on earth, he must go down again awhile into the cave which is the world and teach and preach to the spirits there imprisoned, and only after his period of ministry begin for himself that life which is part of eternity.

Finally, the poetic parable once more resolves itself into prose, and Plato gives us his last word on a systematized education.

It is to begin with music, gymnastics, and the

/ elements of science, calculation and geometry, that

/ is to say, these are to be given to the child, but

not forced upon him, for a free man should be a

\ free man in the acquisition of knowledge, and early

education should be a sort of amusement. Then

comes the second stage of necessary gymnastics.

Introductioa lix

during which, whether they last two or three years, nothing else can be done. And, finally, there is the third of dialectic, which is to last twice as long.

Such is Plato's system of education. Two more points only are to be noted, that it is a compulsory system to be enforced by the state, and that it is to be applied to women, without any distinction from men.

With the system of the Republic should of course be compared that given in the Laws a_" a later, more prosaic, and practical scheme.

For the rest Plato seems very conservative. His system seems on the whole a very simple affair. The conflict of studies, the problem of specialization, scarcely appear in his pages. He is content to re- main distinctly behind modem requirements, and his curriculum is indeed singularly in accord with that which obtained in our fathers' days in our old uni- versities and schools. The Dialectic of Oxford, thfi old Pure Mathematics of Cambridge, the Classical training, literary rather than as now aping the methods of the material sciences, of both, and of Winchester, and Eton, and Westminster, the athletic games and field sports of the old-fashioned English boy, with the music, and deportment of the old- fashioned English girl, with these, with pretty much all that has been weighed and found wanting by reformers of our day both within and without the edu- cational profession, Plato seems more than content.

Ix Introduction.

Our circumstances, it is true, are not Plato's. The machinery of modern life is a thousand times more complex than that of the Greek ttoAis. The battle of life may not be more severe, but certainly the numbers engaged are larger, and the weapons more precise, and barely to hold his own in the struggle a man requires a more elaborate education to-day in London than of old in Athens.

Moreover, there are some things which Plato him- self would recognize as merely a legitimate extension of his own educational principles. The simple laws of health for instance should be taught as part of gymnastic. The very little calculation needed for a soldier (526d), or for husbandry or navigation (527d), has grown into a great deal.

Plato too, we must remember, was legislating for a privileged class. His education, like that provided l)y our fathers, was intended merely for an aristo- cracy, and was therefore naturall}^ different from that of an essentially industrial and democratic community. It is therefore not to be wondered at that Plato's simple rules and slender curriculum should seem an inadequate answer to those who ask, as so many are asking around us, how we are to educate a nation.

Yet in his main principles, that education should extend equally to both sexes, and should continue through life ; that the body should be trained equally with the mind, yet so as to be its servant and not

Introduction. Ixi

its master; that of moral education the secret lies in giving to the child pure and none but pure sur- roundings, and a healthy atmosphere in his early years; and, of mental, in teaching him to think rather than to acquire a_" in all this there is much that is only now perhaps, when education has be- come the question of the day, beginning to be fully understood, and much that requires to be repeated to every new generation.

For every generation will find the problem of education the same, "not to make giants, but to elevate the race at once," not to breed genius, for that must come ^ct^ tvxi/, and having come, will take care of itself, and do not what it can, but what it must, nor to make a few men rich and preeminent in special professions, but to produce a society of persons healthy, happy, sane, intelligent, good citizens, and good guides of themselves and their fellows.

Ixii Introduction.

C. a_" The Dramatis Fersonae of the Republic.'^

The dialogues of Plato, it has often been said, are 80 many dramas.^ They speak to the eye and ear

* The fullest account of the characters of the Platonic dialogues is still an old book, and one written in Latin, the Prosopographia Platonica of Groen van Prinsterer, being his exercise for the degree of Doctor at Ley den in the year 1823. It is a careful work, and many of its citations and obiter dicta are very good, but it is not absolutely exhaustive, and has neither the completeness nor the force of expression of the work of a younger Dutch scholar, to whom it has the honour of having furnished a model, the Prosopographia Xenophoutea of Gabriel Cobet, published also at Ley den in 1836.

The leading characters of the Eepublic are admirably sketched and summarized by Professor Jowett.

'Sane Dialogus Platonis habet fere justi magnitudinem Dramatis, partes, descriptionem, ingressum, progressum, digressiones, exitum: habet interrogandi respondendique vices ita probabiles ut ex ipsa humana natura expressae videantur nil de industria quaesitum appareat; habet sensum affectumque, jocandi viam urbanam, venustam, verecundam. Wyttenbach, Ep. ad Heusdium, opusc II. p. 21. The reader

(quotus quisque fuerit !) who will take the trouble to read Wyttenbach's letter to v. Heusde will be delighted with the enthusiasm of this old scholar for Plato, and the justness of his remarks.

An ingenious attempt has actually been made to arrange the whole of the Republic as a Prose Drama in set acts and scenes. The effort is of course fanciful, but it serves to bring out the dramatic character and the wonderful underlying art, composition, and proportion of this marvellous dialogue.

Dramatische Composition und Rhetorisohe Disposition der Platouischen Republik. Th. E. Bacher, Augsburg.

Introduction. Ixiii

as well as to the mind. They purport to be the talk of Socrates and his friends, and in them Plato, with the magic of the artist, has arrested and preserved for us some echo of the living voice, some colours of the time and place.

As we read them we seem to step back into the very streets of Athens as once they were.^ We move along ; we turn a comer or we enter some open door and see, what have we here 1 A little knot, or gathered circle of old and young, men and boys, grave, sage, keen, beautiful, as our fancy paints ; a hum of conver- sation as they stand about or pass on together, in the centre always the familiar figure, with its rolling bull- like gait and the grotesque ugliness of its features, the snub-nose, and the grim yet kindly penetration of the large prominent eyes. We too step up ; we mingle in the throng ; it may be we link our arm in that of some frank-faced bystander of familiar name, and become hearers ourselves too of the discourse, and are carried away into the world of ideas and ideals, of imagination and speculation and philosophy.^

^Van Heusde is less incisive but eqnally devoted. He saysa_" Ad cognoscendos Graeoorum mores nullum exstat illastriu^ theatrum, quam unusquisque Platonis Dialogus. Spec. Crit. in Plat. p. xvi.

' A charming reproduction of such a scene in the medium most happy for a Greek subject will be found in Mr. Harry Bates' beautiful prize composition, " Socrates teaching in the Agora," now enshrined in the Council Room of the Owens College at Manchester.

Ixiv Introduction.

The illusion is the more easy and complete because the Platonic dialogues are not merely ideal or imaginary Athenian dramas. In this " School of j Athens " we meet many whom we at once recognize as old historic friends. Especially is this the case ' with the central figure : we are quite accustomed to I supplement the Socrates of Plato by the Socrates of Aristophanes and Xenophon, and to picture to our- selves the chief disputant of the Republic or Protago- ras, fighting in the ranks of Potidaea or Delium, or j opposing the same obstinate personality to the dvmm ardor prava jubentium at the trial of the generals after Arginusae.

We do not, however, always apply the same proce^' to all the figures by whom he is surrounded, or realize that they were all living persons who had their place in Athenian or Greek society ; yet it is well worth while to do so, and if we follow the fortunes of thf Platonic characters, we shall find that the dialogue gain a personal and at times a pathetic interest.

Those bright boys, those young men of genius, wh< in real life, as in Plato's pages, were the hearers an( pupils of the Master, Alcibiades and Charmides. Critias and Agathon, Xenophon and Lysias, Pole- marchus and Isocmtes, to what diflferent destinies, it what strange scenes, to what altered relations with one another were they called I

The fate of Socrates himself is a byword. Bu the evil days came not for Socrates alone. Well,

Introduction. Ixv

indeed, for sensational effect did Plato choose the

scene and the actors for the drama of the Eepublic.

That happy home, the house of Cephalus, as we see

^ it in the opening pages of the dialogue, with its

serene and sunny atmosphere of content and aflfection

and unobtrusive piety, where the little group of

family and friends draw round the old man, pausing

still crowned in the interval of his prayers and rites,

was in actual history the witness of a sombre tragedy,

the dark shadows of which throw up all the more by

contrast the bright lights of the ideal

. The old man, Cephalus, happy indeed in his white

hairs, was taken away from the evil to come. Of the

a- *^tle company that formed in circle round him, two

Resides Socrates himself were called on to drink the

iiemlock at the hands of an unjust judge, and a third

' scarcely escaped with his bare life to tell the tale.

The story of what happened is told us by one of

]^e very dramatis personae of the Republic himself,

old by the orator Lysias, with the feeling of a brother,

md the skill of the most graphic while the most

ample of Greek writers.

In the well-known speech where it will be found, the Kara *E/oaTo

Ixvi Introduction.

years ; and during all that time none of our family ever entered a law court either a& plaintiff or defend- ant, but we so lived under a popular government that we neither wronged others nor were unjustly treated by them." In a later paragraph he describes how his family had bome all the burdens and dis- charged to the full all tl^e duties of Athenian citizens.

After Cephalus' death, hfs sons succeeded to his wealth. The house in the Piraeus was occupied by ^ Lysias, while Polemarchus lived at Athens. Together '^ they carried on a shield manufactory, emploj^ing / some 120 slaves, and were known to be of solid and substantial wealth.

When the Thirty came into power in 409 B. C., one I of their acts of violence was to make a raid upon the \ ' resident aliens, Lysias and his brother among the J number. With an audacity which seems almost i incredible, they arrested and pillaged them in cold blood. Lysias was seized, but by presence of mind and good luck escaped with his bare life. Polemarchus, I less fortunate, was retained. He received from the Thirty, says his brother, the regulation message a_" to I a,¬i6ixrfia,¬vov 'jrapdyyeXfia mveiv Kiaveiov a_" to drink the j hemlock, and was hurried out of the world without a hearing or a trial, and even without the common J decencies of the death-bed and the grave, less for- j tunate in this than the more illustrious victim with whose name his own is in the Eepublic for ever I associated.

Introduction. Ixvii

Such in the irony of fate was the fortune of that hospitable roof under which the Nature of Justice was discussed and decided, such Polemarchus' experience of the practical application of the sophist's doctrine of * the interest of the stronger.'

What more it is needful for the illustration of the Republic to say about the family of Cephalus is soon told.

CephaluSy then, was not an Athenian born. Histori- cally he is a type of the resident alien, and his position may be compared perhaps to that formerly of one of those great Jewish families who have settled in our own or other modem countries.

In the pages of the Eepublic, he is the type of an early and simple morality and religion whose rule can hardly be better expressed than in the words to do justice and love mercy, and to walk humbly with God. The good old man of the good old time, he belongs to the Aeschylean age of Athens, an age simple and unscientific, but an age, as its supporters said of it, of heroic and memorable achievements.

Of his three sons a_"

Lysias is of course the most famous, and is well- known, but in the Eepublic he appears only by name, nor would it be in place to digress into a general account of his life. He appears again in the Platonic dialogues. In the Phaedrus an imaginary discourse of Lysias is the starting point of the dialogue, much of which is cast in the form of a criticism upon both

Ixviii Introduction.

his thoughts and his style, and it is supposed that Lysias is also intended in the attack on the rhetori- cian in the Euthydemus.^

PolemarchuSy on the contrary, is noted in the Phae- drus (p. 257) as having been a special student of philosophy, while from the Republic itself we see that he was a student of poetry. Indeed in his quotation of Simonides he is representative of the second stage of thought and morality, the age of 'gnomic ' or proverbial philosophy.

Of his brother Euthydemus we know nothing beyond the fact of his being also a member of the family of Cephalus. The name is a somewhat com- mon one.

The other characters of the drama are Niceratus, Thrasymachus and his two followers or shadows, Glaucon and Adeimantus, the brothers of Plato, and of course Socrates himself.

Nkeratus, though a minor and silent figure, is not without interest. He is the son of the celebrated general Nicias, and like Cephalus, 6fi6vvfios t$ 7ra7nr<^, for Nicias* father had also been a Niceratus. We know from Xenophon that he was a special student of Homer,^ and indeed he has achieved liter- ary immortality as the witness to the possibility of

^ Compare the passage in the Phaedrus, 266,^where Lysias is included in the same category with Thrasymachus.

^ Xen. Symp. in. A§ 5, Kal vvv SwcUfirfv &y 'IXia^a HXrjv Kal ^OdAaaeiav Avb ffrSfutroi clvcip.

Introduction. Ixix

the oral and memorial tradition of the Homeric poems. His father, whose private integrity and piety were well-known, seems to have taken great pains with his education. He made him the pupil of the celebrated musician, Damon, and endeavoured more than once to induce Socrates himself to take him under his tuition.^

His own character was good and amiable, A«riA«ic^s Kttt a,¬lLkdv6p(i)iros (Diod Sicul. xiv. 5), but this could not save him any more than Polemarchus from the merciless cupidity of the Thirty to whose reign of terror he too fell a victim (ibid,),

Thrasymaekus is perhaps a still better instance of a Platonic character, who is also a historic personage, and although Plato has doubtless taken an artist's license, yet his picture in the main would seem to be drawn from the life. Tlie very manner in which he appears in the Republic with his devoted followers would show him to be a person of importance, and the notices we have of him, though few, confirm this idea.

The chief of these is Plato's own in the Phaedrus

(p. 267c), where he is touched off as the " Chalce- donian Giant," the greatest master in Socrates' eyes of

1 Plato, Xaches, 180 and 200.

As NicercUm has the good fortune to be mentioned in the Symposium of Xenophon, we have an exhaustive account of him by the master hand of Cobet, in his Prosopographia Xeno- phontea.

Ixx Introduction.

the art of playing on the passions of men, and moving them by his melodrama, either to anger or tears, or of inventing or rebutting an accusation, possessed more- over of a singular and powerful personality, and exer- cising that very mesmeric power or fascination, cV^Swv KTjketv (Phaedr. 267c.) to which he is himself subjected by the superior force of Socrates (Rep. 358b.).

He was moreover a regular professional rhetorician, and a chief contributor^ to the great rhetorical move- ment which dominated the thought and literature of Greece at this time. His name is thus associated with those of Gorgias, 2 and Prodicus, and Protagoras, and Cicero tells us he was ever over-artificial in the structure of his periods.

Eminently professional, he was then historically, for good and for bad, the very type of the so-called sophist;^ and there can be no doubt that it is with deliberate intention that Plato, in his picture of Thrasymachus, brings out these characteristics which he has made a standing charge against the class a_" notably their mercenary and professional character

1 Quintil. ix. 4, 87.

2 Quintil. iii. 1, A§ 10; Cic. de Orat. iii. 32, A§ 128; eiusd. Orat. xii. 39, xiii. 40, Iii. 175.

3 He is called GpacriJ/iaxos d tf-o^to-njs by Neoptolemus of Paros, who gives his epitaph, a carious one, in quaint tomb- stone style a_"

varpU XoKKrjSCfVf if dk rix^

Introduction. Ixxi

and their desire to "orate" rather than follow the Socratic method of question and answer.

For the rest it is no unkind delineation, and if the bubble of his braggadocio confidence is rather summarily pricked, and his self-satisfaction a little wounded in the process, he has never been a real enemy and remains a friend (498c).

Oddly enough, if Thrasymachus is made fun of by Plato, he was not unavenged. The comic poets made no fine distinction between one philosopher and another, but jibed at all equally. Aristophanes re- presented Socrates as the very prince of sophists, taking pay, and proving black white, and making the worse appear the better cause; and the later comedian Ephippus equally unites Plato and Thrasy- machus as alike mercenary teachers of intellectual and personal follies and fopperies. The passage is so curious that we quote it in extemo a_"

a,¬7ra,¬iT dvcurras evcrroxos veanas Twv a,¬^ ^AKaSrjfieias ris iVo Hkdrayva Kal ^PpvcTfovo 6pa(rvfia)(a,¬ioX. rj \//iKa,¬pfidTU)v irXriyeh amy/cr;, krj\l/iX. oyofua-0(j} Ta,¬;(vr; a-vviav Tis, ovk acrKciTTa Svvdfievos Aeyctv, a,¬t5 fia,¬v fia)(aip(jL ^va-T^ Ixwv rpL^fa^aTa, a,¬v 8' vTTOKa^tcts OLTOfia TTwywvos l^dOrfj a,¬v 8* a,¬V ireSckt^ TToSa riOels viro ^vpov, Kvrjfirfs i/ActiTwv IcrofxkTpois kXIyfiacrLv, ^ For Bryson, see supra, p. xxiL

Ixxii Introduction.

6yK(^ Ta,¬ x^otw^s a,¬v reOtapaKta-fiivos, o-\r\ii^ d^to^pcwv a,¬7riKa^a,¬ts /3aKTr)pi(jL dkkorptoVf ovK oiKa,¬tov, ws a,¬flol 8oKa,¬t lAc^fV * av8pa,¬S rrjs ^A6rjv(U(DV xOovos.^

Ephippus, Navayds, ap. Athen. ii. 509c.

The appropriateness of his name to his character seems to have been already noted in antiquity, for Herodicus punned upon it in words which may have been known to Plato a_" 5 Spacrvfiax^y ael Spaa-vfMxos Ar. Rhet. ii. 23. 19.

He has, as we said, two followers and pupils, Clitophon, the son of Aristonymus, and Charmantides.

Their devotion to him is specially indicated by Plato when he allows Clitophon to break the dramatic rule,

*7ie quarta logui persona laboret/ and cut into the dialogue, p. 340.

This momentary interposition has served to give Clitophon a factitious interest, for it has afforded the ever ready forger of antiquity his opportunity to append to Plato the dialogue which goes by Clitophon's name.

This trifling performance has been ingeniously defended as, at least, an alternative sketch of the open- ing of the Republic, but is now condemned by all good scholars.^

^ K\a,¬iTo

Introduction. Ixxiii

Of Charmantides all that we know is his name and style, which tells us that he belonged to the deme afterwards famous as the home of Demosthenes. He is ILaiavlevs.

It remains to notice the real supporters of the dialogue through the nine constructive books to which the first serves as a negative introduction.

Glaucon and Adeimantus ^ are doubtless the historic brothers of Plato, nor, as we said, need we satisfy an impossible consistency by making them his uncles. Their characters are drawn by Plato with an affectionate hand, and with even more than his usual lightness and grace of touch.

They are brothers, and have a family likeness, but, as brothers and sisters should do, resemble each other with a difference.

Both are thoughtful, both are brave, both are of fine mind, both are attractive, but in different ways. Adeimantus is the deeper nature, Glaucon the more practical ; Adeimantus more grave, Glaucon more gay. They may be compared to Sir Walter Scott's pair of sisters, Minna and Brenda, whose contrasted affinity is so charming in his novel the Pirate; or we might say of them, in the language of another famous portrayer of character, that one excels in sense, the other in sensibility.

The details of their respective traits have been most

^ They are called sons of Ariston, 368a, and their mother therefore would bA« Perictione.

Ixxiv Introduction.

appreciatively drawn out at length by Professor Jowett in his longer introduction, nor will we attempt to repeat again more clumsily what he has done so excellently.

For the rest, their most winning characteristic of all is their youth, and what sits so well on youth, their generosity, their innocent intellectual and moral ardour and unsophisticated enthusiasm, to which the blustering airs and professional manner of Thrasy- machus form an admirable foil.

Of Socrates, in his historic, or even in his generally Platonic character, this is not the place to speak. It is enough to say that he appears at first in his stock r61e of the plain man who is no scholar, and has not the learning of the sophists, but is more than a master for the best of them at intellectual chess playing, and by his fatal questions reduces Thrasy- machus to impotence, to perspiring, and even to blush- ing, and at last to silence. After the first book, how- ever, he gives up both the negative attitude and the elenchic method, and holds forth like a veritable sophist himself. This new departure seems to be necessitated by the character of the Republic, which, of all the great dialogues, is the most constructive.

Such then in its scene and characters is the Republic, eminently Platonic, eminently Greek, scientific, philo- sophic, but also picturesque, or rather sculpturesque, the soul of philosophy, thinking and speaking and

Introduction. Ixxv

moving in a body of art, and wearing a form full of that * chiselled austerity/ that * primal symmetry ' which ennobles the greatest creations of a race which did not need the famous modem motto, in that to it the True seemed always even visibly united with the Beautiful in the perfect and absolute Whole.

J a_¢ A» a_¢ a_¢ .

HAATONOS nOAITEIA.

St. p. KaT^tv x^ ^'i IIckfMiul Lcrd FXaiiKtfvos rov 'ApA£

irpoaiiv(^iCV^ tc tj Oc

rCva Tp^ov irot-rfio-oiKriv, Arc vvv irpArov dTovrcs. koX*^ &iv

o^ Lot Kal 4 Twv kmxio^v irofiir^ ISofcv ctvcu, oi UvTot -flTTov

^(aCvcTO irp^vv 4^v ol 0p$Kf$ lircLirov. irpoo-cv(dMvok Si Kal b

0a,¬A«A»p^(ravTcs iiir^^v irpbs rh &o-tv. KartSt^v o^ ir^^^Ocv '^pas

otxaSc ttA»piiiUvovs noX^i&apxos o Kc^dXov 4k^Xcvo-c SpafuSyra

t2A»v iratSa ircpkMivaC c KcXcv

XoP^I&cvos Tov liaTA£ov, KcXcvci ^pas, ^r\f noX^popx^ ircpt-

iiivak. Kal ky^ UTc

O^os, C^ Jhno-Ocv irpoo-^X<^<'^*'C &^o. ircptfjivcrc. 'AXXd

ircp4icvovfca,¬v, fj 8' 8s 6 FXa^KcoVAxal iXCyt^^ {{(rrcpov & tc ^

IloX^I&apxos "fiKc Kal 'AScCpavTos o tok FXavKcavos &8cX^^ Kal

NtK-^paTos 6 NtK^ov Kal AXXoi riv^, A«^ dirb rf^s iropirf)s^ 6 of v

IloX^papxos ^^ *n Sf&Kparcs, SoKctW pA«k irpbs d

fiA»s diri^vTcs. Oi Y^ KdKMS 8oA£d(cts, ^v 8' hf6. 'Op^s oiA»v

TJiids, ^T) ^cot co^v ; IIws Y^ ^^ "^ toCwv to^tcov, ^i),

KpcCrrovs Y^vc

irerai, t^ I)v ircCo-oicv vpds A«A»s Xf^ ^H^^ d^ctvat. *H Kal

8iivaio-6' dv, fj 8' 8s, ircurai p*^ dKovovras ; O^apws, 2

rXavKwv, 'Hs ToA£vw p*^ dKotKrop^wv,

' A8cA£pavTOS, * Apd 7c, Ij 8' 8s, oi8' Co-re 8x1 Xa; ivds {orat irpbs 328a

conr^pav d<^' tirnwv tq Oc<^ ; ' A^' tinroiv ; Ijv 8' ky^' Kakv8v 7c

toOto. Xaiird8ui Ixovrcs Su&Si&o'ovo'iv dXX'^Xots dpiXX(6pcvok

Tots I'lnrovs ; i^ itms Xfycis ; 0^A«A»s, 1^ 8 IloX^pafxos* Kal iro8s

a A

.. ... 2 . The Republic [book

a_¢ ;a_¢, a_¢A»a_¢a_¢*a_¢!a_¢

l/r a_¢^^'frHf frb Sciifvov ical T^v iravwxCda Ocoo-^fjicOa, -Kal fv^f?-^-

** * '*jft0ot Tc "i^XXbtls T&v^ttv a^69i xal 8iaXc{

*Hki

I.] of Plato. 3

o^ irXcCOToi ^icA»v 6\io^^povrw, {wt^vrcs^ rJLc kv t{ vidripx ^Sgydt iro. 0p6vTcs koI dvaUi. viox6)Mvoi ircpC ir# A«r&^po8A£(na koX ir^l irdrovs koI ciA«A»x^ koI dX\* drra & t&v rotoiirttv Ixcrai, Kal dyavaKTOiNrbv <&s irydXA»v nvSv dirca^cftUvoi koX r&n ^^ . cf IttVTcs, vvv 1^ 0^8^ t^VTfi, ivwi 8i Kal rds t&v oIkcCwv b irpoin)XcucCo'ci9 roQ y^^^ ^povrot, koI M rovnp S^ t^ Yfjpos ii. vovo-iv 6

Ei Otv (Ml Kal ,T($TC i8o{a,¬V IkcSvOS clirctVi Kal vvv O^ fjTTOV.

iravTdira

Kal IyA«^ dycurOcls avroO clir^vros ravra povX(Sp. cvos tTx X^ycbV aiir^v 4kA£vow Kal ctirov *Sl Eli^oXc, otpaC

/

V

4 The Republic [book

ScpC^ios &v 6vo^jojTrh% ktiyiTO o^* 4kcivos ' AOfivatos. Kal rots Sf l&^ irXovo-Cois, xo^*""^ ^ '^ yflpas ^povoxv cS Ixct o air6s X^^of , 5ti oIJt' &v 6 Imciidls irAw n ^{A«A»s Y^f^S I"tA irtifCas IW^KOi olM' 6 &^ iiri, cticfs irXovHj

B -y^oiro. n^r^v U^ ^v 8' ly<&, S'Kl^aXc, A«Sv ic^KTTom toL irXlo irop^Xapcs ^ lircicHjo-a ; Ilot' ^iCTT(rdiip/, t^r\f & Zd&Kparcs; )U

i ndw iiv oSv, ^v 8' Iy(&. &XXd p. oi In too^v8c clirl. rC iiYi<'^rov otci dTad^v diroXfXavK^vai tov iroXX'^v o^Cav kcxttj-

E ^dSc aSiK^o^VTa 8ct Ikci 8i86vai 8CKTVy KaTaycXt^fjicvoi titos, t6tc 8^ OTp4<^ovoav aiiTov t^v ^nixV* P-'^l iXtjScis &v\.' Kal a^^ "i^Toi imh Tfjs ToO y^ipMS &o-6cvcCas ^ Kal ^wcp ^r\ iyyvWptt &v tmv ^kcC fulXXdv Tt KaOop$ avrd. iiro^Cas 8' ^v Kal 8cA£)uiTos i&co^bs YCTverai Kal dvciXayCtenu i^STi Kal oxoirci, cC Tivd Ti '48Ckt)kcv. 6 p.^ oiv c^A£o-kA«A»v cavroi) h Tcp pCtp iroXXoL &8iK^i, aTa Kal Ik t&v iPirvav, d&o^cp oi irat8cS) Oai. oL lYCip^ftcvos 331a 8c4uUvci Kal t j F^ctoL KaKfjs IXirC8o$*/r(p 8i iT)8iv lavrf &8i. kov

i] of Plato. 5

(wciS^ Vj8cta iXirlt &cl irdptcm Kal ^tcUNi yi^porp^^iosy cos Kal HfvSopos Xi^cu xcLfnAvms V&p tov, c& 2U&KpaTcS) .rovr' Ixctvos clircv, 6Ti 8s &v 8iKaCws Kal 6

nayKdXttSy ^v 8' iyci, XiyciSy A« K^+oXc. rovro 8' aiBrd, c Tfjv 8iKCuo

ndw iiv oSvy i^7\f & 2(&KpaTcS ^oXa^cbv 6 IIoX^- t&opX^^* d^ircp Y^ Tt XP'4 2)iMvA£8x] ircCOccrdai. Kal fiivTot, 1^^ 6 K4<^aXosA» Kal iropa8A£8a)p. i. ii, tv r^v Xdyov. 8cl ^dp pc I(8t TMV lipMV (irifjicXTidfjvcu. O^KOvVy I^Tv fy^, 6 noXIpapxos rov yc o-cov kXtpov(S)us ; Ildvv yc, ? 8' 8s ycXdiraS) Kal d&a 'qci irp6s Td tcpd.

A^yc 8^y fCtrov iy^f

6 The Republic [book

2bi. cA»vC&Q yc oif <^Siov dirurrctv* o'o<^ ydp xal Octos dv/jp* TovTo UvTOi 5 rC vorc X^yci, ai) fiiv, aS IIoXiiapxcA» ttrus TiTV^CKCtSf 1^ 84 &7V0M' 8f)X4v ydp Sri oif roOro Xiyci, imtp dprt ^yoffccvy t6 nvos irof oucaradciUvov n ^npofh^ i,'^ (rA»<^p($vc0s 332a dircuToOvTi diroStS^voi* KaCroi yc 6^oX6^a,¬v6v iroii krn tovto, C irafcucaWdcTo' '?) ydp ; NaC. ' AiroSoWov 8< yc o^' WoxmoDv r6TC 6ir6TC ns ia-^ (raMp($v(os diraiTot ; ' AXT6fj, ^ S' 6s. ''AXXo hiitx i^rh TOioOrovy ms foiKCA» X^ci IlitiiavC8t)S t^ rd 6<^iX($&cva SCkoaov ctvoi diroSiS^voi. '^AXXo jiivroi v^ Af , l<^. rots ydp ^CXois otcnu di^CXciV ro^ ^CXovs dyad^v Uv ti Spdv, kok^v 8i p. T8^v. MavOdvtt, ^v 8' h/6' ((n oi rd 6^ciX($i. cva dffo- 8C8A«A»

B dir68o

c 8iCVO

(uvov Kal irpo

D Vj8iNruiTa. Etcv* ^ o^ 8f rlax rl diro8i. 8o(kra rixyr\ 8iKau orvvi] &v KaXotro ; El piv n, 1^, 8

E Kcucfis irp^s v6vov Kal ^Cctav ; 'larpiSs. TCs 84 irioVTa$

i] of Plato. 7

irp^ T^v T^s OoXdmis kCv&uvov; KvP^A»Wjtis. TA£ 8i & SUoios ; iv rim. irpd(a Kal vp^ rC %yyov dwarArwnt ^Ckov9 M^fXtfv Kal Ix^povs pXdiTTfiv; 'A£v TA«p irp

8 The Republic [book

E XP^<''^H^ t KivSwcvcL. OvK &v o^, & <^A£Xc, irdw yi rx

(n)uiA£vci. ELX^irn$ dpa ns 6 8A£KausA»

B iKctvos T^v ToO '08v(r(rlas irp^ pvfrpbs irdinrov AMikvKOv d^air^ Tc KaC ^T(n. v avr^v irdvras dv0p<&irovs KCKdcrOat kXc- irrocrOvy\ 6' 6pK(p re. ^oikcv oi)v ^ SiKauxrvvr) Kal Kard vk Kal Ka0' ''0&Tipov Kol Kard ^i^A»v(di!\v KXcimK'fi ns itvaL, lir' M^cXC^ fiivToi Tttv 4^Xa)v Kal M pXdPx) r&v i\9p&v. o^x oiirflA»s 0^ryc$; Oi pd t6v Ai', li^, dXX' o^Kin ot8a lytt^c 8 n. IXryov. toOto Uvtol li&oiyc 8oKCt In, ^fXcty t&4v nvs

c ^fXovs ''i 8iKaio

v dyaOovs pXdirrcbv. ^aCvcrai. *AXXd &^v ot yc dyaSol SCkoiqC Ta,¬ kal otot jji^ d8bKa,¬tv. 'AXijOfj. Kard 8^ t^v

(S Di&KpaTCs* irovTp^s ydp Ioikcv ctvai 6 XtSyos. Toils d8A£Kovs

I.] of Plato. 9

ILpo, ^v 8' h/^f SCkcuov pXdirrciv, rot^ 8i 8iKaA£ov$ (&^a,¬\

10 The Republic [book

oIuii, ipyov tjnixfiv, dXXA roD kvavrlov. NaC, 0^8i A£t)p^- Tos ^paCvciVy dXXd rov IvavrCov. Ildw yc. O'&Sk hi\ rov dyaOoO pXdirraVi &XXiL rov {vavrCov. ^aCvcrcu. '0 8^ 7c SCxaios &7a6^ ; Ildvv . O^k Apa rov SixaCov pXdirrfvv )[fA»YOVy <5 IIoX^jApx^ <*^ ^CXov oiSrr dXXov oiSlvo, dXXd tov

K {vavrCov, toa,¬ dSCxov. navrdinurC i&ob SoKCts dXijOf) Xlyciv, K^ cS Sil&KpaTcs. A£1 Apa toL 6^ciX^fuva iKd

(&^AA£aV o^ 'Tjv

B Kal 0pa(Huixos voXXdias i^ Kal 8iaXcyoUvA«iv Vii^Mu fUTof^ ^l&a dvTi\aipdvi(r6ai tov X^ov, thrcira inrh r&v irof aKaOTUvA»v 8icKA«iXiA»CTo povXoUvA«A»v 8uucovoxu t^v Xdyov* MS 8i 8bciravoidM6a Kal h/^ rairr' ctvov, o^^ ifjonixCav ^tv, dXXd onNTTp^as kivT^v &nnp OripCov JJKcv ^' if)uls A«^ 8iap. irao-(Suvos. Kal Iy<& tc koI 6 IloX^iiapxos 8cA£oxi, vTis 81,- eifro'fiOTuv* 6 8' els t^ Uo*ov <^Ocydficvos T(si ^^f iias

G irdXai ^XvapCa tLx"^ ^ 2<&icpaTcs ; kuI rC tirfiCltoBt irp^ dXX^Xovs ^iroKaroicXiV^fuvot iiCv airoCs; dXX' ttir y

I.] of Plato. 11

TovTOi 5Ti ^^ov ipmrav ^ diroKpCvccrOcui &XXiL Kal a^bs dir^ Kpivcu Kal cM rl ^xis ctvcu. th SCKatov* Kal 5irA«A»s mi p^ d 4pa,¬t$, Srb 1^ 84ov lorrl fi. T)8' &n rb ^^^^iMv i. t8' ((n rb XvoiTcXoOv JkT8' &n rh KcpSoXiov i. t)8' Sti rh (vpx^pov* &XX& oxi^ttS l&ob Kal &KpiPtts Xiyc 8 ri &v X^yn^' os ^A«^ o^k atro8^A£oMu, lav iJOXovs toio^tovs XiyQS* ]&al fyA«^ &KO^as l^cirXdyifv Kal irpo

' Kal 8s dKO-^o-as dvcKdyx^^ ''< H^Xa oxip8dvuv Kal ctircv

*[l *HpdKXciS} l

12 The Republic [book

dXX' Srcpov ctiro n tov &Xt)Oovs; ^ itms Xfycis; ri &v a^ir^ C ctircs irp^s ravra ; Etcv^ I

^Cvcw g^&l T

D 8' 4y(&i d^ i&oi o-Kc^raiuvfi) oKto) 86cicv. TC ol^v, ^

E 7dp ifjMts SoKpdrcb clfroCcrofAcv. Ildw yc/ ot}Jiaby ^ 8' tfsi t^va 2aKpdTT)s rb clA«iOb$ 8iairpd(TTai, a^bs )Uv i.^ diroicpA£vT)Teu, AXXov 8' diroKpivofi^vov Xaipdvf Xdyov Kal ^Xfyx-g. IIos ydp dv, ^4^v iy

ElirdvTos 8^ Mv ravra, 6 re FXavKov Kal ol dXXoi l84ovro ai&rov i.^ dXXcos iroicCv. koI 6 6pa

^ ^4^A» ^ SttKpdrovs o-o^Co, aiirbv ^v p.^ 46^cbv 8i8d4rKci. Vy ffopd 8i rov dXXttv ir^tidvra }JiavOdva,¬iv Kal rovrA«A»v p, i)8i Xdpiv diro8t8($vai. ''On fUv, ^v 8' Iy<^A» Miv8dva iropd r&v ^^XttVi dXT6fj ctircsi & dpaarvpaxc, 8rt 8i olt p. a,¬ ^js X^Pi'V

i] of Plato. 13

licKvciVi if'c^fSci* IktA£voA» ^dp 6a

otSo. T^ TOV KpC^TTOVOS ^jjs {u&^pOV SUoiOV ctvOi. KOl

ToiHro, & 6paarv)uix

H The Republic [book

a^T^ ^ijfi AvQJL rh Tov KpcCrrovos, fycb 8i 6. yvo&, (nccirWov S^. Sk^cl, )[<^. TavT* IffTOi, f^v 8' fy^. koC fwi. cM* oi KaV ircCdccrOat (iIvtoi rots ILpxown SCkoiov ^s ctvai.; "Ee^tr/t, ndrfpov 8i dva&dpnToC cUnv ol 6^a,¬nms iv rats ir^Xfo-iv

a,¬ iKdorrais ^ otoC n ical ai&aprctv ; IldvTws irov, 1^, otoC n Kol aJLapTctv. O^KOvv lin. x

D irobiTlov rots cLpxoUvoiSy ical rovr^ Itm rh 8CKaiov; Iltts T^p oif; Oi i6vov &pa 8CKai^v Itm xaroL r6v o-^v Xd^ov rb rov KpcCrrovos v&^pov iroKtVi dXXd KaV roivavrCov, rh y. i\ A£v(u^pov. TC Xfycis orv; K^. ''A o^ X^Ycts, ^i&ot^c 8oko*

B OtfMu lyayYC, )[^. Otov roCvw, ^v 8' h/^f Kal rh a^-C^j^opa irobctv rots dpxovo^ re koI KpcCrroo-i 8CKabov ftvoi <&jloXo- Yi)o-6a( cob, 5rav ol \ikv dpxovrcs dKovrcs Kaxd airrots irpoo-- rdrrA«Kn, rots 84 S^Kaiov ctvab ^ js ra&ra iroictv & Ik^vol vpoairafiixv dpa r6rc, C0 o-o^N&rarc 0pa4Hiuix

B ctvob Idcro. ravra 84 dJb^drcpa 04uvos cbftoXdyTio'cv aS IvCorc Toiis KpcCrrovs rd a^ots d(^i^opa KcXcvav rois fjrrovs re

I.] of Plato. 15

Kal dpxofi^vovs iroicZv. Ik 8i tovtmv Toir 6ftoXoYiwv o^Skv (loXXov 1^ Tov KpcCrrovos fvpx^pov SCicaiOV Slv dr\ ^ rh fi^

(vfi^^pov. *AXX', l<^ 6 KXciT04^v, t^ toi) KpcCrrovos A£vji. 4^^pov IXcycv 8 ^jyotTO & kpcCttaw a^tp uM^pcivA» to&to iroii)- tIov ctvai Tip 4{TTovi, KoX T^ S^KOiov TovTo ItCOcto. *AXX' o^ ofh-tts, ^ 8' 8s 6 noXIiapxos IXIycTo. 0^8^, fy 8' lyt^i & c IIoXIiapxC) 8ia^^a,¬k, &XX' cl v^ oUrn X^a,¬i 6pa

KaA£ LOi clirl, fiS 6paarvuix<* tovto 4^ 8 IpoiiXov X^clv T^ SCxaioVy rh toD KpcCrrovos A£uM^pov 8oko{)v ctvcu r^ xpcCr- rovi, Idv re {v&^pQ 4dv tE fcT; olh-tt o-c ^uv X^yciv; "HKurrd y, ^4^* &XXd KpcCmo u ota koXcCv rhv lA£aiAprd^ vovTO, 6rav l{aiAprdv)] ; '^EyctfYC, ctirovA» . f P'tp' o-c r

16 The Republic [book

K^n]. Otci Y^if )&f ^ IffbpovXi^ 4v rots X^is KOKovfyyo^iVTd o-c 4p4(rdai. <&s '^p(SjiTv; E^ (tbr oa,¬v otSo, A£<^. koI oiS^v yi B o-ob irXlov Ivrab* o^c ydp dv u XdOois KcucovpYcov, o^a,¬ i.^ ]^SlO

IXcyCS, oS T^ vMUpOV KpcfrTOVOS 5VT0S SCkOIOV IffTOi T(^

IIttovi. irobitv. T^v np cucpiPcardnp, ^^ X^Tip dpxovra AvTcu vpbs rairra KcucoiipYCi xaV crvKO^vrcb, A n Svvooxu.*

C o^v a-w irapCcfuu,* &XX' o^ p.{ olds r' a_¢gs. OCa ^dp dv U, ctirov, o0ro &avf)v

D vairnis? NavrAv dpxA»v. OiS^v^ otuu, rovro ^oXoyurTlov, 8n irXct Iv rp vi)t, o^' Ixrri kXtt^os vavTT)s* oi ^dp Kard T^ irXcLV Kvpcpv^fTTis KC&XcSrai. dXXd Kard r^v t^x^^ ^al t^v r&v vavr&v dpxV* *AXi0{), K(t. Oi^ovv ^xdirnp tovtwv Kim n (vp^^pov; ndw 7c Oit Kal Tj T^xwif ^v 8' hfa, lirl Tovnp ii^^Kcv, hrX nf rh (vp^^pov iKdorcp t^F^^v '*'< ^al iKiropCtciv; 'Eirl roirnp, &t. *Ap' o^ Kal iKdirrQ tAv TcxvMV )[(m TV (vfiK^pov dXXo i^ 5 Ti p^urra TcX^av ctvcu;

A£ IIms tovto IpuT^s ; "ncnrcp, ^<^v fy

(r<&pA«iTt ctvat

V M Toirrtp iropciTKCvdirOTi Vj t^X^* ''I ^pO^S ^o^ 8okA», if^v,

342a dv clirciv o1h-a X^yuv, ^ oil; 'OpBc^, &h- TC 84 8^ ; airrii

i\ UiTpiK^ 4

I.] ofHato. 17,

8A«A£taA£ Tivos &pcr^S) &nrfp . 6<^0aXMl 6^ws koI Sra dKoi]s Kol Sia ravra 4ir' airots Set nvbs t^x^S '^'^ ''^ lufi^^pov ds Ta&ra

(r<&pATi. "Nai, fd^. OiiSk linrtKf linrvK'g dXX' t^inrois. oiSi AXXt) t^vi) oi8cUa kivr j, oiSi ydp irpoo-SciTat, aXX' iKcCvcp o{i T^X^ lo^v. ^aCverai, l<^ olh-ois. 'AXXd iVjVy & Qpa-

(Tvfutxcy dpxov

18 The Republic [book

Kal irpbs Ikcivov pX^av xal rh IkcCv^ {vfi^pov koI irp^vov Kal X^7ci d Xfyci xal Timet d irotlS diravro. 343a I 'ErrciSi?! o^ ^vravda 4j&cv tov X^-yov Kal ircuri Karcu^v^ f\v Six 6 TOV SucaCov \6yo% els roivavriov ircpicurHKei, 6 0pa

B oiSi irp^Para o^i Troipiva yiyv

ifji&^pas ^ TovTO 86cv a^ol ^cX^crovTai. Kal olh-o v6p^ cl ircpC Tc TOV 8iKa(ov Kal 8iKaioo'i)VT)s Kal dS^KOv re Kal dStxCaSf &m dYvoCiS, 5Tt i\ i^ Sucatoo^hnfi Kal th 8A£Kaiov dXX^uv d^aObv Tip 6vn, toD kpcCttcv^s re Kal dpxovTo$ A£vi4^pov, oUcCa 8i rov irctOopivov ra,¬ Kal imipcToirvTos pXdpT, ^ 8^ d8iKCa ToivavrCov, Kal dpxct tmv A«^ dXT6MS t^M&v re Kal ZiKaitav, ol 8' dpx^^kcvoi iroioiicn rb IkcCvov {vfM^pov KpcCr- Tovos 6vro99 Kal tilBal^va {kCivov irovovaxv {rirrpcTovvTcs aircp, kivTO^ hk oi8* oirwvnofiv. o^mrcCo^ai 8^, c( c^O^vrarc

B S^Kparcs, oir<0o-l XP^ ^ 86caiOs dv^p d8A£Kov iravraxov ^ IXarrov Ix^ irpA«A»Tov i^ Iv rots irpbs dXX^Xovs (vfcPoXaCoiS} 8irov dv 6 TOioiiTot rf rotoimp KOivov^o-Qy oiA»8aio{i dv ciipois Iv Txi 8iaXiio*ci rQA« koivwvCos irXlov Ixovra rhv 8Ck(uov tov d86cov dXX* IXarn^* "(hrfira Iv rots irpbA« r^Jv ir^iv, Srav t6 Tivcs cUr^pal cSoav, 6 ji^ 8A£KaiOs dir& r&v Xa-wv irXlov clo--

E ^pci, 6 8' IXarrov, Srav re X^^'cts, 6 ft^ oi8lv, & 84 TroXXd

KCpSofva. Kal "ydp Srav dpxV '"'^A°' ^XH ^^'r(posA» rf Uv 8iKa^ Mlpxci Kal d fcT8eJiCa dXXT tTfc{a, rd 7c olKcCa 81'

I.] of Plato. 19

dUXciav fLo\ih\por{ptA»i ^A«Vf Ik 84 toD 8t)u

(uydXa 8uvdfccvov irXcovcicrctv. Toiirov otv oic

(uucdpiOi K^KXT)VTai, o^ fc(Svov 6ir^ rwv iroXiruv dXXd Kal imh r&v AXXA»v, 8

TaOra dvikv 6 Opao^pax^*^ ^ ^^ <^X

20 The Republic [book

8i8dA£ai Uavws ^ uiGfiv drt oihus cl^rc dXXcos lx<' ^ ay. iKphv otci hn\a,¬t^iv irpa-yiui 8iopCta,¬(r0(u, iXK* oi pCov

s SuiYory^v, { &v 8ia7<$fcfvo8 Skcuttos Vjicav Xv

B ircCGiis tts ^oTi rij$ 8iKau

C 84 6p^, & 0pcuriipaxa,¬, ttx ydp rd lpirpo

D oi iroip^va. tt] 8i iroipcviKVi oi 8^prov dXXov rov UXci i) i^' ^ T^raKrai, 6uaA»$ rovnp rb P^Xtvotov ^KiropiCC' lircl rd yt airfjs Atrr' ctvai PcXtCott), iKavws S^jirov iKircir<$purTai, Scos y dv pT8^ 4v8lxi Tov iroificviK^ ctvoi* oUrta 84 tpp^iv SycoYC vvv 8*^ dva7Kaiov ctvai tjptv 6poXo7civ ird

1.] of Plato. 21

{KtCv^ T^ Apx^K^? '^^ '^^'^ OcpaTcuofc4v^, tv rt iroXiTucQ koI e ISutTiKQ &PXF ^ ^ '''^ dpxovras kv rats V($Xc

(iib-OttTiK^ (iurOdv ; a{{n 7&p aMfi 'jj 8iivc4us. i) rfjv larpiK^y* trv Kal rfjv KvpcpvTjriK'^v 1% aMjv KaXfis ; ^ Idvir^ Po^H ^P^Pms 8upA£;civ, d^inrcp inri^cVf oi84r ri ulX- ^ XoV Idv Tt9 KvPfpvwv ^"^s yCyvr^^i 8id rb (vju^pciv air^ irXitv Iv TQ OaXdrqi, Ifvoca tovtov KoXcts itoXXov aMjv laTpudjv; Oi 8{jTa, l[<^. O^ 7% otuu, rfjv i&icrOomx^Vi Idv iy^^Cvt] ns iurOapvAv. Oi 8fJTa. TC 81; rfjv larpiK'^v p. ur6apvi)TiK^v, Idv U&tcv<$s ris i&urOapvQ ; Oi^K, t^r\. OiKoi^v c T^v 7f o^cXCav iKdxrrqs rffs rlxvtis l8Cav cafcoXoY4ox4tcv ftvat ; "EtTTM, lf<^ ''HvTiva Apa &^tkiav Koivf ^cXovvrat irdvTts ol 8t)uovp7oC, 8i)Xov Srt kovv^q rtvl rtp a^cp irpoo*- XP^Mvoi dir' IkcCvov ^^cXoiyvrat. ''Ecikcv, I<^. ^aUv 81 ^1 t6 uor0^v dpvvfUvovs o^c\eto- 6ai tovs 8Tfcuvp70^ dir6 toO irpoorxpfjcrOai txi liicrOwriK'g Wx'HJ T^YVccrOai a^irott. Huvl^ d ^j6yi9. O^ &pa dv& t{)s a^ov tIx. vtis iKdcrr^ aM) ifj ^cXCa lorCvy ^ ToO fcur6o{) Xfj4'iA«, dXX% cl 8

22 The Republic [book

E irpoiKa ip7dtTTai ; Otpat lYoryc. O^kovv, ca 6paon))iaxCf rot)TO i)8T Sf]Xovy Sri oi8c}iCa tIx. vi 0^84 apX'H i*^ a^^ri A»^^i)iov irapcuncevdtci, aXX', 6ucp irdXat IXIy^H^^y "^^ ''^ dpxoi^V(p Kal irapooTKevdtct Kal lirtrdTTci, rh 4kcCvov Ivp^^pov a_¢fj^rrovos 6vro% o-kovovo-a, dXX' oi rh toO KpcCrrovos. 8iA S-ij rathxt l7a7a,¬, A£ t^CXc 6pa(rviaxC} Kal dprt ^ryov p. T84va c9^a,¬iv cK^vra dpxciv Kal taL dXX<$Tpia KOKik p. cTaxcipCtc

B &rav iO^wo'tv dpxctv. i) o^k otcrOa, Srt t6 ^iXdnfAtSv re Kal

(^iXapTvpov ctvai tfvci8os XcYcraC tc Kal tfoTtv ; ""Eyaytf ^^. Aid raih-a roCvw, fjv 8' fyeft, oi)rc xp^H^i^v Ifvcxa iO^txriv dpxA«v 01 d7aGol oih-c Tifcfjs' oih-c Tdp (^avcpws irparT^ftcvot t{)s dpx^s ^va,¬Ka iurObv p. icr0arol povXovrai KcicXfj

Q irpoo-ctvai Kal tTiCav, cl piXXooxriv 46^a,¬iv dpxciv. 5Gcv kiv- Swfvci rh iK^vra firl rh Apxtiv Uvat dXXd ii] dvd7Kiv ircpifi^vciv alirxp&v VfVO&C(rOau Tf)s 8i ti&^S p. CYC(m r^ {nr6 irovTipoT^pov ApxA«rGai, ^v ^i) a^his i0^'g Apxctv. i^v 8cA£oravWs poi <)aCvovTai dpxciV} &rav dpx(*

D 8wcva, ir6Xis dv8pttv dTaGcav cl t^voito, ircptidx'T'^^ ^^ ctvcu rb fc^ ^X^^^A» ^S

I.] of Plato. 23

Karo^v^ ywiir^fu &rv rtp 6vn. iXrfiivhs llup\

I61 8Vj, fjv 8' t^6f & 8pcuri6^X

24 The Republic [book

Tc Kol l6vT 8wdftfvoi dvGp^wv (f^* kivtovs iroicUrOoi. 2^ 8i ot

B

B ctrc )LOi 8oK

, Kal d(iot, dX. X' o^ dv 8ivaiT0. 'AXX' oi tovto, ^v 8' lytia,

C ^cma, dXX' cl tov ji^ 8iKaCov li) dftot irX^ov Ixctv fct)8^ PoiiXcrai 6 8CKaiOs, tov 8i d8CK0v ; 'AXX' oUriat, fi^, ixa, TC 84 81) 6 d8iK08 ; dpa d(ut roO SiKaCov irXcoyacrctv xal Tf)s 8iKcUa$ irpd^cws; 11^ ydup oi^K ; 1^, 8s 7c irdvrwv irXiov Ix***^ d(toC OiKoOv xal d8CK0v dv6p4&irov re xal irpd{cc0S & d8iKos irXcovcK'Hio^i Kal duXX^o-CTai ms dirdvrwv irXdcTTov aMs Xdpu ; *1EaTi raCrcu *08c 81J XIyA«}mv l+ip'*

I.] of Plato. 25

o SCicaios ToO ji^ 6ioCov oi irXcovocrct, rov 84 dvof&oCovy 6 tk dSucos ToO Tf 6fjLo(ov Kal ToO d, vo(toCov.^ "Apurrci, {^, ctfT- d K0A«. "Eon 8^ ytf {<^y, ^<$vti<$s tc Kal d, 7a^ h ASikos, 6 8i SCkcuos oi&8^Tcpa. Kal rovr', C

*Io"A»s. *0 84 lirurHjifccav

26 The Republic [book

Kol dfcaOcl. Kiv8wa,¬i(lcu 'AXXa ii]v (&ioXo70vicv, cp 71 Spoios ^Kdnpos ctT, TotcCrov koI {xdrcpov ctvau *AioXoYovficv ^dp.

*0 i^ dpa SCkoios Tjptv dvairl^VTou &v dya969 tc koI 0-0^^, h Zk dSiKos dfca6'/js re icdl Kcucds.

D 'O Si Bpajr&^\oi <&UX^7T

E dSixCav. i) oi UfcVT)

B

l] of Plato. 27

vdXctts &VC1I 8iKaioonvi)s t^ Svvai. iv Taimv Ifci, ^ dvaYKii airiQ fcCTd 8iicaioo^)vi)s ; El (i^, )k^, A«^ crv dfm. IXcycs, x IX^S 4 StKOUMrvvTi (TOi^Ca, (icrd 8iKauNrvvi9* cl 8*, cbs fyi^ ^cyov, furd &8iKCa$. Ildw &7afuu, ^v 8' fyMy c& 0pao-v- liAX^ ^ o^K lirivfvcis fc(Svov Kal dvava,¬Va,¬i$i dXXd xal diro- KpCvci irdw KoXAs. Sol ^dp, M^, \apCl, 0[i. ax, "EZ 7c crv vd&v dXXd 8^ Kol t58c )ufc x^*^'^^ i^^^ ^^* 8oKCit &v i) v^Xiv i) (rTfHir

28 The Republic [book

oi T&p fhftiyi eroi lvavTUMrouu, tva fc^ Toto-Si d'n^x^H'<^ "lOt 8V, fjv 8' fy^i Kol T& Xoiird f&ot rfjs c(mdo-cA«0S diroirX'^ pcMTov d, irolcpii^fccvos &nrtp xal vi^v* im Uv ^dp Kal

(To^i&TCpoi Kal dfccA£vovs Kal Sward^^oi irpdrrciv ol SCxaiOi ^(vovraif ol 8i dSiKOt oiSkv irpdrrctv mt' dXX'tfjXwv otoC re, dXXd 8^ Kol o^ <^afccv ^aAivtts vwinyri n )iCT* dXX^Xwv

C KOivti irpogat dSCxovs 6vTat, ro^ro oi iravrdiroo-tv dXT0^ Xl^oiicv* oi 7dp &v dirc^x^vro dXX'tfjXttv K0fci8{ 6vrcs dSucoi, dXXd SfjXov ftrt lvi)v ns airols SiKOMo-irvTi, i\ airo^ liroCci p^i Kal dXX^ovs 7c Kal i^* oa,¬s ^ccrav dfta dSiKCCv, St' fyf lirpa{av & lirpa{av, dSp&t]o-av 8i iirl rd dStKa dSiKC^ Vjfci&<$x-

D Oripoi 6vrcs, km\ ot ya,¬ irafcir<$vTipoi Kal rcX^cos dSiKoi rA«k4ms cUrl Kol irpdrmv dSvvaToi* raOra i^ o^ Sn oifrois Ixci. fcavGdvO) dXX' o^x <^ (tv t^ irpttrov IrCOctro. cl tk Kal dfuivov t^o-iv ol SCmuoi rSv dS^Kttv Kal c^SaifMWoT^MC cUrtVi 6ucp T^ iJoTfpov irpoiO^iAcda o-Klirav0ai, o-kcitt^ov. ^Cvovrai p^v oa,¬v Kal vvv, &9 fyo\ SoKct, 4{ cSv clptfJKapcv. tfpA»$ S' Iri P^Xriov o*KCirWov. oi ^dp ircpl roO Imrux^vros 6 Xdyos, dXXd iripl toO ((vriva rp^irov XP"^ V{v, SKdira 8^, li^. Skovw, 4)v 8' fy^. Kai LOi Xlyc* SoKft rC ovt ctvat

A£ tinrov Kpyov ; "Epot^c *Ap* o^ ro^ro &v OcCt$ Kal tmrov Kol dXXov 6tovo0v Ipyovy 8 &v i^ ptSvy ^Kc^vcp iroi j Tt9 i^ dpiorra ; Oi pav6dva, {^. * AXX' c&8a,¬* IfvO' ^np &v dXX^ i: 8ois i) 6

B 'AXXd, l<^, pavOdvtt re KaC poi 8ok

I.] of Plato. 29

A«roi ctvat cKdony, f^'^ Kol Ipy^^v n vpovriraicrw, ; tA«uv 8i lirl t8l aM, irdXtv* 64^aX(idV J^^, fomv Ifryov; "EoYiv. *Ap' o^ KoX .dpcTfj 6^0aXftAv l

(TwcxMp^o'ap. cv n; X'^^ *^^^^ 8kKauo-vvt)v, KaK^av 84 dSiKCav; 2wcxA«P'4o'aJicv Tdp. 'H Uv Apa 8kKaA£a ^^v)^i\ Kai 6 8CKaios dWjp ct puSiTCTai, Kojcfis 84 & &8iK08. ^aCvcrai, lf<^, Kard riv irhv \6yov, \ ' AXXd i^ 8 ^c c^ l&v iaKdpu$s re Kal 354a Mal^y, b 84 i^ rdvavrCa. U&i y^p oH ; 'O Uv 8CKako$ dpa ci8aA£uiA»v, 6 8' &8iKOs dOXios. "Eotwouv, Ii^. 'AXXd )i^ &6Xu$v 7C a,¬tvai oi Xvo-itcX

30 The Republic of Plato. [book i.

cumdcrOM kv toSs BcvSi^Cois. 'Yvh

B &XX' ^S

<^ (TTfpov Tj dSiKCa Tf)s 8iKaioo-vvTs, o^K &va,¬v\6^r\v rh fcf oix ^irl toOto IX6a,¬iv dir' 4kcA£vov, wore fioi vwl y^ovcv 4k tov 8iaX<(Yov iT8iv cl84vai* 8ir^c ^dp rb 8CKaiov p^ ot8a 8 l

B.

'Ey& Uv o^ ravra clin^v (pfciv X<$yov d, iniXXdxOak' th S' 357a '^jv &pa, MS loiKC, irpooCfiiov. 6 y&p TXa^Ktay iid re dvSpci^ raros &v Tvyx&vti, vpbs Airavra, Kal 8f koX rdrc toO 0paA«rv- l&dx^v ''^^ &ir6^^i)o-vv oiK AircS^aTo, &XX* I4"1 *^ SwKparcs, ir^cpov 'fjiiAS PovXii 8oKtfv irnrciK^vat i)

-?]V 8' hf6, SoKct Ti ctvoi TOiovrov. Ti hi; 8 a^^ tc a^ov X^piv dYairwi&cv Kal rov &v' airov yitvoii^vmv ; olov a^ t6 <^vfiv Kal rb op&v Kal rh {rytoXvctv* rd "ydp Toiavrd irov 8i' ii^j^&rf^ &

31

32 The Republic [book

8oKCC, t^f TOiS iroXXois, dXXd tov firiir^vov ctSovs, 8 fcur6ttv 0' ftvtKO, Kal e^Kii^o-A«A»v Sia 8^{av liriTi8cvTlov, air^ tk 8i' ainh ^cvkWov A»s 8v x<^c^^v* Ot8a, ^v 8' fy

B^IGv 8^, l<^, &Kov

C (TOffcai rhv 0pao-v)fcdxov X670V, Kal irp^orov fciv lp& 8iKaio- 0Shn]v otov flval ^turi Kal 80cv YCYOv^vai* Scvrcpov 8i &rt irdvTcs a^hi 01 ciriTi8cvovrcs dKovrcs linTi8cvov(riv cos dva^Katov dXX' ovx

D A«0s &icivov d8iKA£a$, oi8fV($s iru dx^Koa (^ PovXouii* pov- Xoiai 8i airrh KaG' a^b a,¬7Koiiat($icvov dKoOo-ai. pLdXurra 8' otfiai dv ox{} irv0^

E oOvTos. dXX' 8pa, ^ o-oi povXofUvtp d \4ytA», Ildvrcov

(jidXurTa, fjv 8' Iy(A»* ircpl 7dp t^vos dv p. dXXov iroXXcbcis Tis vovv )[xA«v x^^P^** X^Y

nc<^K^vai 7dp 8Vj ^curi rh Uv dSiKctv d7aO<$v, rh 84 d8iK

II.] of Plato. 33

jUv Ik<^cvy

*Qs 8i Kal ol iiriTT8evovTa,¬s &8waiA£f toO &8iKCtv &Kovra,¬s aM lirin)8c^ov(ri, ^AXurr* &v alo-0oA£M6a, cl TOtdvSc irotij- c ir(UMV rp Su&voC^* Sevres ^owKav ^KaWpcp irotctv 8 n &v po^Tfrai, T^ Tc 8iKaA£(p Kal r^ &8CK(p, cV firaKoXovO^(rai,icv 0fA»(jicvot irot i\ liri. OviA£a iKdrepov A{a,¬i. 4ir' a^o^pcp o^ Xdpoi.tcv &v rbv SCkcuov t^ &8A£K(p cl$ rafrbv Uvra 8id Tfv vXcovcA£A£av, 8 iracra <^v

32 The Republic [book

8oK^, A¥^, Tols iroXXots, dXXd tov Imir^vov ctSovs, 8 (uoOmv 0' IvcKa Kal ci8oKi(ik^

B'lOi 8^, ][<^, dKovo-ov Kal 4(u{i, Idv croi. ravrd 8okq. 0pa(rv- l&axos y&p [un 4aA£vcTai. irpwiaCrcpov tov 8^vtos imh (rov &mrtp 6^is Kt)Xt)0i)vat, 4iol 84 oihrw Kard. voih^ Vj &irtf8

(Hivi]v otov dva,¬d (^oo-t Kal 6dcv Yryov^ai.* Scvr^v 84 8tv irdvTcs a^frr^ ol iiriTT8cvovrc8 Akovtcs linTii8cuovo*iV os &va7Katov &XX' o^ &s 6. yaB6v, rpCrov 84 Srt cIk6t

D &9 Aftcbvov dBbK^as, oi8cv6s ira aK^Koa cA»s PovXofUii* ^ov- XoUU 84 afrb KaO' airb hfKiaii. ial6^a,¬vov dKofknu. (MiXurra 8' otiat &v

B oOvTOS. dXX* 8pa, ct

ILt^Kivaa, ydp 8ij ^a

II.] of Plato. 33

jUv licc^cvyciv t^ Sk aip

'Qs dk Kal oi linniScvovTCS iZvvayJU^ toO &8i. kA«Cv Akovtcs aM liriTi)8ciov(rt, (MiXurr' &v al

34 The Eepublic [book

B rbv Pao-iX^a. ^6dvra 84 Kal Tfv TwatKa a^oO ^ixtOaavra, Iter' {kc^viis liri6^ievov rtp paciX^ &iroKTctvai Kal Tfv &pxV KOLTwryfiv, cl o(pv 8vo toio^o) 8aKruXA£o 7cvoCordifv, Kal rbv i4v 6 8A£KaiOS ircptOctro, t&v 84 6 d8iKos, oi8cls &v t^oito, cos 86(cicv, o^A»s cl8ap. dvTivos, 8s &v (icCvcicv 4v rj 8tKaioo-i(hq) Kal ToXiij

C Igbv ainr^ Kal 4k rfjs d^opas a8cos 8 ti Po^Xoito Xafipdvav, Kal cUri^vn cl$ rds oUCas

D d8tK^v. XvoarcXctv ydp 8f otcrai iras dWp iroXv paXXov 18A£^ Tfv d8iKA£av rfjs 8tKato

E Tiv 84 KpCo-iv aMjv roi) pCov ir^i. &v XlyoitcVi 4dv 8u)um)-

11.] of Plato. 35

^rfikv d(^ipcA»)icv i^c Tov oS^kov dtth rfjs aSucCas, i^c toO SiKaCov dirb rfjs 8tKaio

BapaC, fv 8' hf^, & ^CXc FXavKwv, cos l^apivas iKdTcpov, &tnra,¬p dv8pidvT0^ els rffv KpCo-kv iKKaOaCpcis Totv dv8potv. 'Slis pdXMrr', l<^, 8vvapai. Bvroiv 84 toiovtoiv, oi84v Iti, cos l^f p4u, xoXcirbv iirc(cXOdv t^ Xd^cp otos cKdTcpov pCcs

34 The Republic [book

B Tbv Poo-iX^a. ^Odvra tk Kal Tfv Yin^tKa a^oO ^ixisCvavra, Iter' IkcCvtis firi6licvov rip Poo-bXiC &iroKTcCvai Kal rfjv &pxV KaTa4rx^v. cl o(pv 8^o rowOna 8aKruXA£o 7cvoCordifv, Kal t^v ^ 6 8A£KaiOS ircpiOctro, rbv 84 6 dSiKos, oiScls Av yivovn, cbs 8tf(cbcv, oitros cl8a)&dvTtvos, 8s Av (ic^vcicv 4v rfj 8tKaioo-ihq) Kal ToXiij

c ^v aihr^ Kal 4k rfjs d^opas dBt&s 8 ti. Po^Xoito Xaipdvci. v, Kal cUrtdvTt. cts rds oUCas a-vxiCyvttrdax Snp PovXobTo Kal diroKTiwiivai. Kal Ik 8c

D d8iKctv. Xv

E Tiv 84 KpCa%v aMjv toO fiCov irlpi &y Xfyotcv, Idv 8i, a(rni]- a-(&icOa t^v tc 8iKai^TaT0v Kal rhv d8iK<&TaT0v, otoC t^ 4

11.] of Plato. 35

p, i)8^ (u^ipA»)icv (i'^Tc ToO oSCkov dtth rfjs aSixCas, p.^c rov 8iKa(ov dvh rfjs 8i. k(uo

Ba^aC, ^v 8' h/^, & ^CXc FXavK^v, cos i^A»\UvA»s iKdrcpov, ^(nrcp dv8pidvTa, els Tfv Kpltnv iKKaOaCpcts toCv dv8poCv. '12s pdXion"', ]f

36 The Republic [book

E hn}Uv9i. XcktIov otv' koX Sfj kAv aYpoiKorlpcds Xfytirai, i'? 4Jii otov X^civ, & 2(&KpaTC$, dXXd tovs ktraxvo^vras irp6 8iKouo

(iSCKOv. T$ 5vTi. Tap ^trown rhv dSiKOv, &tc liriTi)8ciKVTa irpaYfUi aXt)6cA£a$ Ix^P^^^^ i^^^ Ar^ vp^ 8

PaOfUiv ftXoKa 8iA <^pcv6s Kapirovicvov, ^ f[S T^ Kc8vd. pXafrrdvct PovXc^ipATa,

B irpMTOv Uv &pxei. v 4v tq ir^ci. 8okovvti 8iKaC( ctvat, lirciTa Yafcctv 6ird0cv Av Poi)Xt)rai, lK8i. 8dvai els o^ Av po^XTTai, {vfipdXXciv, Koiv6vcA£v ots &v lOIX'Q, Kttl irapd Taihti irdvra ^cXcCo^b Kcp8aCvovTa np i- f 8vcrxcpaA£vciv r^ d8ucctv* els d^&vas ToCvw Uvra Kal 18C^ Kal 8t)A0(rC(^ vtpiyCyvta^aA Kal trXcoveKTctv r&v k)^9p&v, vKtovoKToUvra 8i irXovrctv Kal tovs

c Tc 4CXovs ct iroictv Kal ro^ ^X^P^ pXdirrciv, koI Ocots 6vo-Ca$ Kal dvaO^fMiTa UavMS Kal iicyoXo^p^n'^ O^ct'V tc Kal dvaTiO^vcu., Kal Scpatrc^civ rod StKaCov iroXii' AfUivov to^ Oco^ Kal r&v dv6p(&irav o^ Av Po^XTTai, ^trrc Kal 6co<^iX^ on-cpov airhv ctvcu poXXov irpo

D TaOr* clirdvTos tov FXavKwvos fy& \Lkv kv v$ ctx^y tu XlycbV irpbs Tavra, 6 8i d8cX<^bs afrod 'A8cC&avT0$, OH rC irov oCci, [if^,] & St&KpaTcs, iKavus clp{)

E d8^Tov iroi,{)o-ai poT]OcCv 8iKaioo-^. Kal 8s, Oi84v, ^^,

II.] of Plato. 37

XfyaS) dXK,* hx koX rdSc Akovc. 8^ ^op SicXOctv i\^JSus xal rovs IvavrCovs X670VS &v 88c ctiriv, ot 8iKau

dKpas piv TC ^Ipciv paXdvovs, p4

f\ Pao^Xfjos dp^povos 8(rTc 6cov8^ ci8iKCa$ dWx'Q

irvpoiis Kal KptOds, pp(6iQ

38 The Republic [book

8i o^K Ix^'^^^y* ^ K^ ^ linuvos ical 6 ij^^yos ofros ^Kar^pwy.

np^ 8^ ro^Tois (TKlilrau., & S^Kparcs, &XXo a9 clSos X^ywv iripl 8iKau

A«0S T^pf p, 4v KaK<$TT)Ta Kol lXa86v fcrriv 4X4

T) Wii8(A«is' XcCt) p4v 68^, pdXa 8' lyyvOi valA»-

Tf$ 8* dpcrfs l8pA«Ta 6col irpoirdpotScv i6TKav

KaC Tiva 686v paKpdv tc Kal dvdvTt)* ol 84 Tfjs r&v Ocmv iir'

&v6p<&iray irapa7(iYijs rbv "Optipov popTvpovTat, 8Ti Kal

Ik^Cvos ctirc

XuTTol 8^ TC Kal 0col a^oC, Kal Toi^ p4v 6vo-Caurt Kal c^oXa&s dTavatoriv A£ \oiP^ TC KvCorg TC irapaTpwirwo-' dvOpA«A»iroi

Xunrdpcvoi, 8tc k^v ti,$ inrtpf^ Kal dpdprg.

II.] of Plato. 39

fUfSknv 8i 6ui8ov irop^x**^'''^^ MovoxiCov koI *0p^w9t 2cX'^vis Tc KoX Mowr&v lyytfvcovi &s ^oua-if koO' As OuvproXowi, ircC- Ooms oi i.($vov l8u&Ta$ dXXd Kal tracts, d^ dpa XiwrciS tc Kal KaOapiol &8uct)tdTfiA»v 8iA 6v

Tavra irdvra, l<*^, S

40 The Republic [book

E Xoihmu, o^K dXXoOlv Toi a^o^ t(rjicv l\ &KiK6a)Lcv ij Ik tc r&v \6yA»v koI r&v YCvcoXoyiio-dvTwv iroiTTMV* ot 8i airoX o^Toi X^ovoTiv &9 cUrlv otob Ouo- Cais tc Kal cix*'^A°'^S d^av joa Kal dvaOijia(ri irapd7a,¬

B X/fyown Kal ol OcAv iratScS} iroitpul Kal irpo^fjrai. r&v OcAv 7cv^icvoi, [ot] Ta{)Ta oUrto^ ^X^i'V i. Y)vvoiNnv.

Kard rCva o^v In X^yov 8ucaioo-innfpf Av irp^ (iiryCimis d8iKA£as alpoCjicO' &v; l\v ^v icr* civxT))LO

iTx

D ya,¬ dXXcov oi8cl$ Ikc^v 8CKai. os, dXX' inrh dvav8pCas ^ Y^i9*^ 4 Tivos &XXt$ do^cvcCos trfyct rh d8i. Kdv, d8waT^ a^r^ 8pdv. cbf hif 8f)Xov* 6 ydp irpSros tAv Toio^Tav els 8vvauv M&v irpATos d8i, KCA£, KaO' 6o^v Av 0X69 r^ {{.

Kal TovTtfv dirdvTwv oi8^ dXXo atTiov l\ IkcSvo, 60cvtr^ dirat & X^os ofros dSpiT)orc Kal TA«p8c Kal Ifiol irp^ a^, & Zi^KpaTcs, clirctv, 6Ti*ft 6av&d(ric, rcLvrwv i&dvy 6o^i ImuW-r

B TOi ^T^ 8iKaio

II.] of Plato. A«

jbcvoi, &rttv X^oi XcXctijivoiy {i^xP^ '''^^ ^^ &vOpte

42 The Republic [book

tlrcY^VTMy &8tKA£av, 8($(as re ircpl a^Av Kal (lurOovs fyKa&iCi- E ^($VTcA»v Kal Xoi8opovvTov, croO 8i o^k &v, cl p,'f cr^ KcXfiicis, 8i^n irdvra rhv pCov ov84v ttXXo anoir&v StcX'^XvO

KaV fyc^ &Koi0XiS &cl Uv 8^ r^v <^i)

irat8cs *ApCo^ovos, kXcivov OfCov y^vos dv8pds.

to^)t6 JLoi & ^CKoif ^ 8oKcC A¥x**'V* ^vv ^dp Octov ireir^v- Oarc, cl i^ ir^ircurOc &8iKA£av 8tKaio(rvvTs &Jicivov ctvai, o^h-co

B 8vvdicvoi clirciv inrkp a^oi). 8oKa,¬tTC 8/j (lot <&$ dXT)6cos oi ireirCtcrOai,. TeKiaA£poj. ai, 8i {k roi) &XXov tov ifuWpov rp^irov, iircl Kard 7c airo^ roits \6yov9 '^Cotow Av i&tv* 6(np 8^ paXXov irurrcvo), TO

C { irapaYCv6(&cvov 8iKaio

(i-fj Pot)6ctv ^Tb liirv^ovTa Kal 8vvdicvov ^hfy&r^OA. Kpdrt- OTOV oSv oitrcos, 8iras 8vva&ai., firiKovpctv a^rg. "O tc o9v ITXaiiKttv Kal ot dXXoi. 48^ovto iravrX rp&m^ poTOi)

D dXX' 6A£i pX^ovTos, &9 fyjoX ^aivertu,. iirci8f o^ i\'^lis oi 8ccvoC, 8oKCt iOi, ^v 8' Iy<&, Tou&imv iroi. i(ra(r6ai ^TTo-iv airoVf oKavircp &v d irpo

lu] of Plato. 43

0a,¬ir dva-yyttvat p,^ irdw ^ pX^irownv, lirctTd ns ivcv^

(Utjlov irdXis cv6s &v8p

rCTvcTOi ToCwvy fv 8' fyc^, ir6XiS} &9 lY^pai, iirct8^ rvyx!&, ^iov iKacrros o^k a^dpKtjS) dXXd iroXXov iv8efi$* 4^ rCv* otfi dpx'^v &XXt)v irtfXiv oIkC^civ; O^fitav, Ij 8,' 6$. Oi^c* 8^ dpa irapaXafipdvwv dXXos dXXov iir' dXXov, rhv 8' C hr* dXXov XptCt^f itoXXmv 8c6p, cvoi,, iroXXoils cl$ iA£av oCKijoav dTcCpairrcs koivwvo^S tc Kal PoijOo^, Tavrg tq {woikC^, lO^I&cOa ir^Xiv 6vo}Uk, Ij "ydp; Ildvu Uv o(pv. McTa8C8tt

44 The Republic [book

Zk Mfj^ro9 Kal tmv roto^ttv. "Eo^b ra^ra, ^ipA§ 8ij, fy t* hf6f v&s ^ TT^is ApK^crcb lirl TooxivTtv irapacTKciWjv ; dXXo Tb YCAipY^ )Uv cts, 6 84 oIkoS^ims, &XXos 84 ns i^vnis; i^ Kal o'icvTOT<$uA»v avrtfcrc irpoo^ijo'oficv i) Tbv' &XXov r&v iripl 1^ cTMf&a O^MtiTfvHjv ; ndw yc A£Ci 8* &v i 7c AvaTKObordni

B irtfXbs 4k TCTTdpcov i ir4vTi &v8pA«ftvA« ^oCverob. TA£ 8^ o^; Iva fKOfTTov To^MV 8

B 8ba^paA»y r^jv ^^

(TxoX'f^ ircpbUvcbV &XX' Avd^Kii t^v irpdrrovra np irparro-

fclv^ liraKoXov6ctv p.^ Iv irap^pyov Upcb. 'Avd7Ki. 'A£k 8^ TovTwv itXcCm tc iKaoTa YCYverab Kal xdXXbov Kal ^$ov, ^huv cts Cv Kard ^^trnv Kal 4v Kabp

II.] of Plato. 45

*AXT0i). T^KTovcs 8^ Kal x<^k{js Kal toioGtoA£ nvcs iroXXol 8i]jibovfyyo(, koivmvoI ^Ltv roO iroXixv^ yiyv6^xyoi, a-vj^vhv a'irh iroioiNrbV. Ildw Uv oiH^. 'AXX' o^k &v v

46 The Republic [book

D darOcWaraTOi rd,

B )t^ irdw &{ioKObV46vTTOi &ax, ii[v 8i toO

IIp&Tov otv

B x^^H^vos <^j)i^bf(rp4v

c poiipfvob ircvCav ij ir^cpov; Kal 6 FXa^wv innkaJfUvVf ''Avfv Jd^v, l^y A«bt loucasi iroi^s tovs dv8pas 4rTuA»i^vovs.

11.] of Hato. 47

*AXt)OiJ) fyf S' lycG, X^^cis. 4irf\aO

48 The Republic [book

Kal r&v TTipX t6v Yuvaucctov K^criiov. Kal a,¬fj koI Suuc^vwv v\ti6vA»v 8cT(r^)uOa* i oi SoKct Sc^crctv muZaywy&Vf titOmv, TpcM^v, KOJiM0Tpu&V Kovp^MV, Kal aS 6roiroiA»v Tc Kal ta7cA£- pttA»v; Irt Si Kal crvpA«A»r&v irpoo'8cT(r6ic0a. toOto ycLp ti

Kal if) X^P^ '"'^^ ^ i^< tKaWj rp/^civ tovs rdrc orUKp& 8^ iA£ Uavf^ Ifrrau ij vAs Xi^wiicv; Oi^A«A»S C^. O^koOv rfjs r&v irXT)o^ov X^^ ^K-^^ &iroTiiWov, cl jiXXofccv iKavfjv ^tiv WMiv Tf Kal dpo{)v, Kal ^kcCvois aZ rfjs ^fMWpas, l&v Kal ^K^voi 6j^&axv airovs 4irl XP^F^'^'^'V kxtjo-iv Airctpov, ircppdvrcs t6v tAv i, vayKaiA»v 8pov; IIoXX^ dyd^Ki), 1^,

E & S^KpaTis. IIoXc)t^o-oJicv rh Jicrd Toi)ro, S FXa^MV ; ij irAs lo^nu; OihtDS, It^. Kal ^ifikv yi ir

B X^YciS) t^* TC o^ ; fjv 8^ fy^* 4 """^^ "^^ irdXcftov Ay^vCa oi TCXViK-fj SoKct ctvab; Kal JldXc^ 1^ *H o^ n crKvriKfjs 8

n.] of Plato. 49

dXXwv (TXoXV dytav 8ia pCov aM ip^at^iLCvos oi irapuls Tovs Kaifovs KoXtts avcpTdtorOai* taI 8i 8f ircpl riv in$XciOv c ir^Tipov o^ ircpl irXc^crrov 4

50 The Republic [book

IIos o2vi fV S' iy6f & rXavKttv, oiK A'ypioi &XXVjXois lo-ovrac

c Kal ToCs AXXois iroXCrais, 6vtcs roioihvi rds ^v

D d^aObs oi i^ T^vilTfu. raOra 8i dSwdrois Iockc, Kal oihta 8^ {viPaA£vei dTaObv ^^tXoxa &8vvaTov ^cWo-Oau Kiv8wc^, l<^. Kal k^ diroptfj

A£ ji^vt' dv i\Kurm, kv f TJp. a,¬ts irapcpdX\ouv r^ ^ifXeucu olcrOa ^dp irov r&v ya,¬waJiMv kwA«ov, (Sti tovto <^^ci aifrcov rb fjOos, irpis tiv TOVS onn'^Ocis tc Kal ^yMpCfiovs

B 8fXov. 'AXXd (t^v K0Ati6v yt (^(verab r6 irdOos aih-ov Tfjs ^vo-cois Kal &s dXiOAs <^iX<$ox

II.] of Plato. 51

a,¬ti\ o-uvl(rci Tc Kal A^voC^ optl^licvov t6 tc oUctov Kal t^ aXX^iov; Oi8afcws, ^ 8* 6s, 6iraA»s o^. *AXXd (Uvroi, ctirov ^y(&, T<$ 'yc ^LXo&a6b Kal ^iX^

Tis o6v 4 irai8cA£a; f^ yjaXeirhv tiip^lv PcXt^m Tfjs inrh rov oroXXov XP^^^^ cipT)fUvt]S9 l

52 The Republic [book

irXdrrcrab Kal IvS^fcrat rinros, 6v &v ns po^XTpxib ^vo-i)Jif,- va(r6ai iKdirrip. Kou8j Uv oiJv. *Ap' o^v f^^SCois oUra irap^

I TcXcwOuo-iV, ilx^bv olT)(r6)uOa Sciv airoiis; O^' oircMrriovv ^ c iraf^(roJicv. IIp&Tov 8^ "fw^^v, cbs lobKCv, knum. Tt\fr4ov rots fivOoiroiots, Kal 8v )Uv &v KoXbv iroiVjo-oxriVi ^'yKpi. T^ov, 8v 8* &v ji^, diroKpi'Hov. Toips 8' i^'^P^i'''^* ircCcro^uv Tds Tpo<^oirs re Kal iT)T^pa$ Xlyciv rots iiuurC, Kal irXdrrciv rds in)xc^ airwv TOis fivOois iroXt^ &aXXov ij rd o-^i&ara rats x^^^* c&v 8i vih' X^YoiMTi. rois iroXXovs ^K^Xifr^ov. IIoCovs 8/j ; I4il. 'Ev Tots icC;oo'tv, fv 8' k^^f fivdois 64'6fu0a koI tovs IXdrrovs. 8a,¬A£ ^dp 8^ rhv airhv rinrov clvai koI rairhv B Siivao^at tovs ti jJicCtovs koI tovs IXdrrovs. ^ o^k otci ; "Eyary', 14^* &XX' oiK kwo& oiSi tovs fi(C(ov8 riva% Xfyits. Ods 'Ho-Co86s TC, ctirov, Kal "0}iilpos ^fttv iXryfrTv Kal ol dXXoi iroiTjTaC. o&roi ^dp irov av9ovs toIs &v6pi&irois 4'cv8fis o-wTiO^cs HXeydv ti Kal Xfyovo-tv. Ilofovs 8^, 1\ 8* 8$, Kal rl a^wv Jia,¬Ji4^p. a,¬vos Xfycts; "Oircp, ^v 8' hf6, XP^ Kal irpcoTov Kal JidXivTa lUp^co-Ocu., &XXas tc Kal Idv Tts ^i\ A£ KaXtts 4'C^^''^^ ^^ TovTo ; "Orav cUcdlD Tts KaKos r^ \6yfif ircpl 6cA«^ tc Kal if)pwoA»v oloC cUnv, &o*irA«p Ypot^vs jiif)8h' loiK^ra yp6u^wv ots &v Sfioia povXij6f 7pdiraiu Kal Yap, A¥^T, 6pOci)s tfx<^ Td YC Toiavra p^ii^^O'Oai. dXXd irws 8^ X^YOJicv Kal irota ; Ilpttrov \Uv, fjv 8' fycfi, t^ UYi(rrov Kal iripl T(3v JiryCoTCiv tfc08os & clircbv oi koXcos iil'cvoxiTOy c^ Oipav<$s TC clp^douTo & (fT)0'b 8pd(rai aiT^v 'Ho-A£o8os, 8

378a tc aZ Kpdvos A«$ InfuapifjoxiTo a^T^v. Td 8i 8^ toO Kp^vov Jp7a Kal irdOri imh tov vUos, oi8' &v A fjv dXTjOfj, ^ip Sccv f^8i6is oih-M Xfyco'^at vpbs &<^povds tc Kal Wovs, dXXd lidXurra p^ o-iTdo^t, cl 8i dyd^Kii Tts ^v X^civ, 8i' diro^p'^Tttv dKovciv (^ dXiYCvrovs, 6v(raUvovs oi x^^**'^ dXXd Ti tLh/a, Kal diropov Ovfia, 8irws 8 ti 4Xax^

II.] of Plato. 53

dK^Hkrou Kal "ydp, ^ 8* % ofrof yt ol Myoi x**^**"^^' Kal oi XckWoi y, tf4iiv, A«& 'A8cA£JiavTC kv t{ fji&cWpf iriiXci. otuSi XcicHov v^ dKOvovTt, &9 dSucov rd loxara ovSh' &v B davfiAtrrbv irobot, o^* aa,¬ dSiKOwra irar^pa KoXdtwv iravrl rpdircp, dXXd 8p<{^ &v ^Trcp Ocwv ot irpoA»ToC tc Kal ti^yuTTOi. Oil (id rbv ACa, 4) 8' 6s, o^ a^w (lOb SoKCb ^r^Scia clvai Xlyctv. Oi6i yt, fjv 8* fy<&, rb iropdmiv &s 0(ol Ocots iroXc- ^A«^' Mv(K TC Kal iiripovXc^iovoi. koI i&dxovTai a_" oi8i ydp dXtjOf) a_" , cC 7c 8ci if)Liv ToiA»s fUXXovras r^v ir6Xiv ^XdA£civ aXayymv voiC;civ rh ^hUa9 dXX'/jXois dircxOdvcQ^ai* voXXov Set YiTavTOi&ax^as re jivOoXoyi)Wov airots Kal irobKiXrlov, Kal dXXas ^X^pas iroXXds Kal iravTo8airds Ocmv tc Kal ^p

64 The Republic [book

S^prov &iro8

KaraKcCarai 4v Ai6s oi$8cb KT)pA«0v IfpirXcioi, 6 j^ MXwv, a^dp 8 8ciXMV' Kal f Uv &v fiC{afi & Zc^ 8(p dji^0T^v,

dXXorc (Uv TC Koxu 8 yc K^^penu, dXXoTC 8* 4(r0Xf * f 8' &v A^, dXX' &KpaTa tu IfTcpa, t^v 8i

KaK^ poi^pptto-Tis M \96va 8tav iXavvci. ^ o^'

dYaOwv TC KaKMV tc TlrvKTai.

T^v 8i Tttv SpKov Kal cnrov8fiov fr&yxya-Wf 4\v 6 ndv8apos

(Tuv^ccv, l&v Tis 4*^ ^^' 'AOtjvds TC Kal Ai6s ye^Qvivaiy o^k

380a firaivc

Kal At^* oi8' at,

v^s, 8ti

6cbs fj^ alTCav ^va Pporots, Srav KaKwo-at 8oAa 11x^1.1^181^ MX.

II.] of Plato. 55

dXX' Idv TiA« iroi j 4v ots ravra ra lai. pa,¬ta lvc

(vfM^opa ^)ttv o^c

TC Si 8^ 6 Scvrcpos 88c ; dpa YiStfra t6v Ocbv otcb ctvai d Kol otov iA£ lirbPovX{)s ^avrd^co^ai AXXorc kv dXXcus IS^ifi, TDxi tiv ainhv y\.yv6\kwov koI dXXdrrovra th airov clSos els iroXXds Mp<^ls, Tori Si ifjfids dirarAvra koI iroboih^ra v^l a^rov TOiaOra SoKA«iV, i^ dvXovv tc ctvai Kol vdvTMV ^Kum. ri\[s iavrofi ISIas ^KpaCvctv ; O^k i\

56 The Republic [book

ird0os ropdjcii re koI. dXXouSo-cicv ; NaA£. Kal (tVjv irov Kal rd 'yc (vvOcra irdvra o-kcvt) tc Kal olKo8oJii^JiaTa [kcX &m^iIo*- IJiara] Kard rhv oMiV X6yov rd c^ clpTao-fUva koI ^ Ix^^'''^ inrh \p6vov re Kal r&v AXXwv vaOTjiJidrov 'ffKio^ra dXXoiovrai.

B*'E

' AXX' dpa avrbs abrhv (JtcraP&XXoi dv Kal dXXotot ; Af^ov, S(n], (Sti, cCircp dXXoiovrab. n^repov oSv lirl rb piK^n^v re Kal KdXXiov (lerapdXXib kivrhv ^ M rh X^^PAr^ i^^^ ''^ ato-xtov lavToi); 'Avd^Kt), I^t, lirl rb x^^P^^^y cCircp

C dXXoioOrai* oi ^dp irov Iv8cd 7c ^^(ro]j. cv rbv 6cbv KdXXovs 4) dpcrfjs ctvcu. 'OpOdrara, fjv 8* bf&f Xfycis Kal oijrws ^XOVTOS 8oKa,¬i &v tA£s

D IfMi'yc 8oKa,¬t. Mt8a,¬Is dpa, ffy 8' iy*^, & dpicrrc, Xcy^tw ^iiv Twv iroiiTA«ov, ws

Ocol leCvounv ^ik^tcs dXXo8airot(n., iravToioi rcX^OovTcs, liri(rTp(ii)^w(rb irdXtas* ^T)8i Ilpoir^aiS Kal 0fri8os KaTa4'a,¬v8^o^a [Lrfitlsy ^rfi' kv TpaycpSCais ^tfi* kv rots dXXois iroiifjiiao-iv cloxfyfro *'Hpav a_¢^ouDpivTjv MS Upeiav dycCpovoxiv

'Ivdxov 'ApycCov irorafMv iraio-lv Pio8(&poi$*

E Kol dXXa Toiavra iroXXd a^ i\y. tv tfcv84o-6aKrav. (&i]8' aS imh ToifrMV dvaira,¬iOdfia,¬vai at JiT)Tlpcs rd irai8Ca 4K8a,¬ifiaroi(}vTA«v, Xfyovo-ai rovs K-^Oovs KaKus, cos &pa OcoC nvcs ir^Upxovrai. vvKTop iroXXots 4vois koI iravroSairots lv8aXXdp, cvoi, tva a^ d; xa \kkv els Ocois pXiur(n]&tiA»oav, &pa 8i rovs iratSas dir^- a- ydtwvTai 8eiXoTipovs. M^j -ydp, ^nl\. 'AXX' dpa, ^^v 8* iy***

II.] of Plato. 57

aimX ji^ ol OioA£ cUrbv otob a^ furapdWciv, tjiJitv 8i irobovo-b SoKCiV o-^os vavTo8airo{ ^Cvco-O

(jMu TC 8i SVj ; ih kv rots X^^ois ^cv8os irdrc Kal r^ XP^^*^

(jMv, ^o^a,¬ \ki\ &(iov ctvab pCo'OT^s! dp* oi irp<$s ta,¬ tovs ttoXc- pCovs Kal ruv KaXovp^vttV <^A£X(av, 8rav 8id pav(av i) riva dvoiav KaK6v ri 4inxciptt

58 The Republic of Plato. [book n.

ivnv oil ^voca &v Ocbfi 4'a,¬v8oiro. OOk iimv. IldvTxi dpa d4'cv8^ T^ 8aiu$vi6v tc Kal rh Octov. IlavTdirao-i j^ o^v, ^i. KouSj Apa 6 Oc^ airXovv Kal dXiOb iv re ISp-y^ Kal 4v X<$Y(p, Kal o^c air^ luOurrarab oiSrt &XXovs i^airar^, [oih-c Kard ^avrocrCas] oih-c Kard X^-yovs oih-c Kard

v6o'wv t' dtrcCpovs Kal paKpa^ovas P^ovs, {i)t&iravTd T* clii^v Oco^iXcis fyas rvxas iraiMV* liriV(f^At)0'cv, evOvp^v lU. Kd7A«^ T^ ^oCpov Octov dtjicvSIs (rT

Kl

<

Ta fOv S^ ircpl Ocovs, ^v 8' ky&, roiavr' drro, &9 loiKCv, 386a dKovcTT^v Tc Kal o^K &KOv

PovXoCiATV k' lirdpovpos i^v Ot)Tcv^LCv dXX(p dv8pl irap' dKX^pip, [f p"^ pCoTos iroXvs ^t,1 ij irdcTbv vcKvco-ot KaTo^Ob^Uvourtv dvdoirciv'

Kal Tb

KOl

oUcCa 8i OvTiToto-i Kal dOavdToun, ^mlvcCti

& irdiroi, f[ ^ Tts tm koX dv *At8ao 8^a. oi(ri ^Irvx*^ Kol ct8A»XoV) dTdp ^p^vcs oix Ivt irdMrav* 59

60 The Republic [book

Kal 387a I Kal rh

KOl

ot

)nix^ 8' ^K (ScO^MV irraiUvT) "A'tS^o-Sc PcP^JKct, 8v irdTMv ^o^oMra, Xiiroikr' dySporf^ra Kal ijpip'*

^n^x*^ 8i Kard x^^^^S* ''l^'''* Kairv<$s, (pX

il

&i 8' &Ta,¬ wKTcpCScs K'Vxf AvTpov Oc

TpCtotNrai irorfovrai, ktrtC k4 tis diroiricrncriv

6pjMi0oi) 4k irlTpi)S} dvd y^ dXX'^X'Qo-iv Cx^'^^^*')

&S at TCTpi'yvtat dp.' fficrav,

B rafhu Kal rd roiavra irdvra 'Trapairr(r^p^a "OfiTipdv re Kal

Tovs dXXovs iroiTfrds p. ij x^^^^*^^^***^ ^^ Sia^pd^^wiAcv, ovx

iroiTnK(OTcpa, rovoimp fJTTOV dKOvoriov iraKrl Kal dv8pd(riv,

o^ Set iXcvS^povs ctvai, SovXcCav Oavdrov fAoXXov irci^opT]-

pivovs. navrdirao-i p^ o^. Oi^Kovv In Kal rd ircpl

c ravra dvdpara irdvra rd Scivd re Kal ^^cpd diropXTfr^a,

KoiKVToOs Tc Kal Srvyas Kal Ivipovs Kal dXCpavraSi Kal

dXXa So-a ro^ov tov rvirov dvopat^p. cva ^pCrrciv 8ij iroict

A»S ot

dXXo n* TJpcis 8i imkp r&v ^XdKwv ^Povp. cOa, }k^ Ik rfjs

Toiavn]s ^pA£Kt)$ Ocpfi^Tcpob Kal pxiXcucurcpob toO SIovtos

^^vwvrai ii^lv, Kal dpO&s ^S t^, ^opovp. cOou 'A

dpa; Not, Thv 8i IvavrCov rvirov ro^ois Xcxriov Kal

D iroiT]Tlov ; A^Xa 8"^. Kal tov$ dSvppo^s &pa l(aipy

Kal TOVS otKTovs TOVS T&v IXXoyCp^v dv8pA«ov; 'AvdTKTi, C<^,

cICirfp Kal Td irptfTcpou Sk^itci S^j, ^v 8' ky^/ cl dp6cas

labp^o-op^ ^ oH,

lincucct, ofircp Kal halp6s IrrXf rh rcOvdvat oi 8civbv

VJY^o'CTai. #aplv ^dp. O^k dpa inrip 7' IkcCvov &9 Sciv^v

Ti ireirovOdros dS^oiT* dv. Ov 8f)fra. *A\Xd p.'fjv Kal Td8a,¬

III.] of Plato. 61

Xiyoiicv, A»s 6 toiovtos iLdXurra airbs avrtp a^dpias irpbs rh c^ tT)V Kal Sio^^^^^^^s ''^^ &XXA»v iiKurra IWpov irpo

KvXiv8^icvov Kara K^irpov, 4(ovoiaKX'^8i)v dvoiid^ovr' dv8pa ^Kaorov. iroXv 8' tn tovtcav i&dXXov 8ci)fr<$}ic6a fj.'^oi 6covs 7c iroictv d8vpoUvovs Kal Xiyovras

& ircSiroi, ^dvat, fj ^^ov &v8pa 8taKOfAa,¬vov ircpl &

at at lyf&v, 8tc jLOt 2apirT8dva ^CXrarov dv8pwv jLotp' inrh IlaTptfKXoio McvotrtdSao 8a)iif)vak. cl ^dpy & 4^A£Xc *A8cCAavTc, rd rotavra TJAtv ol v^oi onrov8iQ i dKovoicv Kol a.^ Kara^cXiGcv (bs dvofCcds XryoiUvcav, crxoX^ &v lavr^v yi ns dv6pA«Mrov 6vTa dvd(iOv iyffyraxro tovtoiv Kal

62 The Republic [book

lirtirX^ctcv, cl Kal Moi ainp toiovtov i) X^^civ i) Troictv, dXX' 0^8^ al(rxw<$icvos o^ Kaprcpuv iroXXovs Itrl o^iKpoio-i

E iraOijiUM-b Op^ovs &v ^oi Kal 68vpjLOvs. 'AXTiO^oTara, I^t], X^^cbs, Act 8^ 7C oi^X) A»s Aprv Tj&tv 6 X^^os I(Hjjmuvcv' (3 ircurWov, ^A»s &v rts '/j^tos &XX^ koXXCovi itcCctq. Oi ^dp o^ 8ct. 'AXXd iijv 0^84 (^iXov^ttrds ^c 8a,¬t ctvcu. orxc86v 7Ap frrav ns 4+fi l^TC^P*? Y^wrtf l

do-pco-Tos 8' &p' IvcopTO Y^^S \ukK&pa,¬(nn Ocoto-iv, a_¢

ws t8ov "H^K&urrov 8ul 8

o^K &iro8cicWov KaTd rhv vhv X<^yov. El trv, l<^, PovXci A«l fyhv TbO^vat* oi 7dp o^ 8f &'iro8cicWov.

B 'AXXcL i&'jjv Kal &X'/jOcidv 7c ircpl iroXXoi) iroiT]T^ov. cl 7dp 6pB&9 ^fyo)&cv ttpTi, Kal T

c (0

D Iv Tfi ir^Xci

Tuv ot 8tiiocp7ol Caoa, lidvTiv ^ Itp^pa KaKtfV f\ tiKrova 8ovp(iv, KoXdo-ci MS lin. T^8cvfia cUrd70VTa ir^Xccds &o^cp vcA«s dvo-

III.] of Plato. 63

TpcirrtK^v Tc Kal ^Opiov. *Edv 7c, ^8' 6s, M yc X^y^ Jepya TcXiTat.

TC 8^;

rlrra, crionrj ^a*o, 4)m^ 8' liriircCOco iAY)6

[tcrav i&^'ca irvcCovrcs 'AxcitoC,] criYQ 8ci8itfTcs (n]fidvTopaS) . KoX 8

olvoPopcs, Kvvbs 6iiaT' lx"^A» Kpa8CTv 8' IXd(Kio ) Kol rd Toin-Mv c{i)s dpa koXcos, Kal 6

o-Crov Kal KpciMV, \U9v 8' {k KpTpH)pos d4A»^o-ov

olvox<^ 4^p4'Q(rb Kal ^YX^^Tl 8e7rda,¬(r

Xi)&(p 8' oVktuttov Oav4eiv Kal ir<$Tjxv lirunretv ; a- {^ ACa, Ka6cu8

64 The Republic [book

8c(r)&bv 8i' h-tpa rotavro. Oi id. thv Ala, ^ 8' 6s, oH &oi

D ^Kifvenu 4iriT^8ciov. *AXX.' ct irov nvcs, ^v 8' ky6, KciprcpCaL irp^ diravra Kal X^'yovrai Kal irpdrrovrab imh 4XXoYCj. A«dv &v8pA»v, Ocarlov re Kal ^KcnKTr^ov, olov Kal ih

(TrijOos 8^ irX^{as KpoBCt\v '^vCirairc i^pOfp* T^rXaOi 8^, KpaSCt]* koI Kvvrcpov dXXo iror* lrXv)s. navrdircun (jiv o^v, 1^. Oi i^ 8ij 8A»po8^Kov$ 7c iariov ctvai Tovs &v8pas o^ ^iXoxfn)&dTovs. 0^8aMA»s. O^'

A£ 4

8A«0pa Ocovs ircA£6ci, 8A»p' al8oCovs Po^iXfjas* oiSi rhv ToO 'AxtXX^cds ir(u8a'ytt76v ^oCvuca iirabvcr^v, cos ierp^S ^cyc

*OkvA« 8< 7a,¬, ^v 8' fyA«, 8t' "Ojitipov Uytw frn o48' A«

{pXa^nis i' iK&tpyt, Ocwv ^XcxGrarc irdvTav' ^ 0-' &v ruraA£)&Tv, ct jloi St^pis ^e TrapcCTi*

B Kal A»s irpbs t6v irorap^v, Ocbv tfyro, dirciO^ clxc Kal idxc(r6at SroipAS ijv* i^^^ ^^ ^^ ''^^ iWpov irorap^v Sircp- Xciov icpds TpCx^S ITarp^KXip ijpw'C, C<^, Kdp. Tv 6ird- o-aip. b 4^^pco-0at, vcKp^ 6vTi, Kal ms ISpacrc tovto, ov ircicrWov* rds tc aa,¬ "Exropos IXJcis ircpl rb (rfjJMi to IlaTp^KXov Kal rds tA«v ;cA»7pT]64vTA«A»v cr^K&Yas els t^v irupdv,

c {vp. iravTa ravra oi ^'/jo-op. cv dXT0{) clpf

k

in.] of Plato. 65

Tc KaV dv0pi&irav. 'Op0A«&s, 1^, X^-yiiS. M^ toCvw, ^v 8' kfA, ii8i TdSc irfie<&icOa ii)8' tojiiv Xfyciv, &9 8icrc^ IloatiMvo9 vi^ UfipiBovi tc Ai^ 6pMo'cv oihtos lirl Sctvds dA»A«a. A«y48, fci)8^ Ttv* AXXov OcoO vaCSd rt xal 4\pA» ToXfci0tu d &ir Scbvd Kal iuT^ fyy&mmrBojL, ota v^ K(vraifffii8ovTiu aM^* AXX& irfKNrava7Kd(A«A»icv to^ irobTT&s i) i''j Tottirwv airi Hpiya ^vou i) Toirrovs p.^ clvcu OcAv iratSos, Ap^^pa 84 &4^ XIy<'VA» R^i 4iA£v Imxciptfv ircCOciv tovs Wovs, A«bs ol Ofol Kwcd YcyWooi, Kal ipA« &vOpd&inA»v oMir PcXrCovs* Ihnp Y^p Iv Tois irp^orOcy IKfyofuv, oM* 8o-ia Ta&ra ofrc b dXiOfk* iva,¬8cA£A£aicv ydp irov 8n Ik OcAv kok^ ^TVfffiiu &8^nNuroy. IIws -ydp oH ; Kal p.*^ Tots 7c iiKO^ovax pXaPcpd* vot Y^p kwr^ {vY7V(op. iiv l{ci Kax^ Hvrtf ircioikU A«^ ftpa TOiaOra Tpdrtovo-C tc koI lirparrov Kal

ol Ocwv A'Yx'^'^^^P^) ol 2Si)v^ hy^i ^^ *^'*'' 'ISo^v irdTov Ai^ varpcpov Pap^ jo-r* Iv alOilpt, Kttl o^ v6 o^iv IA£Cti)Xov aZpa 8aiJi/dvA»v. Ay Ivoca vavo^lov tovs tomvtovs p, i)6ovS} p*^ 4H^ ^^^^^ X^ c^lpctav I IvtCktoio^ Tot$ Wois iroviipCas. KopiSp p^ 392a oSv, 1^.

TC civ, ^y .8' ly^, KK'^v] ^ Xoiir^v ct8os X^ttv irlpi 6pt(op4yois otovs TC XckWov koI pij ; ircpl ydp OcAv &9 8tf Xlycrdat ctpTTai, koI ircpl 8ai. pdvov tc kaI -iip^tav koI r&v h ' Ab8ov. ndw p^ o9v. O^oihr koX ircpl 4v6p^A»v r6 b Xoiv^v cCi dv; Ai^Xa 8^. 'ASvyarov 8^, & ^

(ipA£a' Nol Td p^ TOiaOra dircp^v Xlyciv, Td 8' IvavrCa TO^ctv irpovrd^ciy fSciv tc Kal pvOoXoycCv* 4\ o^ otci ; ES p)v oSv, 1^, ot8cu O^KOvv Idv 6poXo7Js 6pB&s pc Xlyciv, c E

66 The Republic [book

^o-tt crc

Td [kkv Sij XdyttV ir^i 4x^rA« lAos, t6 8i X^co)s,

B 1^ 8' 6s, oi JMiv6dva 6 ri X^^cis. *AXXd \Uvroi, 4v 8' ly^' 8cC yt, to-ws o({v Tg8c poXXov cto-ci. dp' oi irdvra, tfon vir^ lAvOoX^YttV i) iroiTTA»v X^'yerat, 8iVJYtio*is odo-a rvyxSi- vci ^ ya,¬/ov6Tiav i) 6vTfiA»v 1^ uXX

*Ap' odv 0^1 iJTOi dirX^ Sitjt^ctci I) 8id {aiia'/jo-ccos yiyvoiUvj^ Ij 8i.' dfi4oT^p<*v ircpaCvovo-iv ; Kal Toihx), ^ 8' 6s, In. 8fo&at o*a<4

A£ ctvai Kal do'aA«^s. &nrfp oiv ol d8vvaToi X^'yciv, oi Kard 6Xov dXX' dTToXapcbv pipos ri ircipdo-opaC o-oi kv rovrtp 8T]X^ai 8 Poi()Xoiai. KaA£ jLOb eM* 4irA£(rTcunu t{)s 'IXid8os rd irpwra, Iv ots 6 irotT'Hjs <^o-t t6v p^ Xpvonr]v 8^o-6cu ToO 'A-yajUpvovos diroXikrai tJjv SiryaWpo, thv 8i x^^**"^^^- CIV, rbv 8^, Itrci8'fj o^k It^tx*^** I KaTa,¬vxa,¬

Kttl ^CaxrcTo irdvras 'Axatovs,

'ATpcC8a 8^ pdXurra 8vA«, Koo-p^opc Xottv

Xfycb TC a^irbs 6 iroitp-fjs Kal oi8^ ^x^ip^ i\[L&v ri\v 8id-

B voiav AXXoo-c rp^irciv, (0S dXXos rts 6 Xfywv ^ a^inSs* id 8i perd raiyra &

*IXC4 Kal ircpl r&v kv *IOdK^ Kal iSk^ '08\MnrcC^ ira0t)pdTwv. ndw p^ o9v, 1^. OiKoffv 8iVJYtion, s piv lo*Tt Kal 6Tav ids jWjo-cis ^dorroTc X^ Kal tfrav rd pcra^v t&v (^^cA»y; IIms

k

III.] of Plato. 67

yap oH; *AXX' Urav yi riva X^ j^criv &9 rn AXXos &v, c dp' oi r6ra,¬ 6Mtovv aMiV

68 The Republic [book

Toi)To, 1^, iav6dvay Sn tm rh ircpl rds rpaytfilcus* roiov- Tov. 'Op6<$rara, l

c XoyCas '/j Uv Sid ibi'^o'cas ^Xt 4

D cTKcirWov ctvai. 'AXXd Ui. VT]jLai. Tovro roivw a^h ijv 8 IXeyov, 8ti xP<^^ 8bOiMXoY4o-a(r0at iriSrcpov ldfro&cv rovs iroiiTds UMVUvovs ^K*^^ '''^^ SiTfy^cis iroicttrOai Ij t^L Uv lAtjMV)UvovS) rd, 8^ {i.-^, Kal 6irota iKdrcpo, Ij oi8i ii)i. cto-9ai. MavTc^o)UU, I4^T], o-KOircto^cU crc, ctrc irapa8f{dji. c0a rpo- y^fiCav TC Kal K6i^Cav els Tfv irtfXbv, ctri Kal oif. *Txm9, i5v 8' ly*"* ^<*s ^ a_¢^*^ irXf^ In Toin-wv' oi ^Ap 8^ fYw^^ m* ol8a, dXX' Sitq &v 6 \6y09 &nrtp irvcvia (^pi[, TavTQ

A£ Irlov. Kal koXws 7'* t^, \iyti

B Kal Tpa7(p8ois ol a^roC* irdvra 8^ ravra Ui^iiara' i) oi{;

III.] of Plato. ' 69

Mi&^jMTCu Kal In 7c to^A«A»v, & 'A8cA£uivtc, ^olvtrai &oi els irfuacptfT^Mi KOTOKCKcpiiaTCorOai ^ toO 4v6pi6irov ^iwrit, ^94rTf &8^vaTos ^vai voXXA KoXfis Uut(Hku Ij aML lictfva irpdrTftv &v 84 Kal fdl Ui^iaTd lo*Ttv &^iou6iaTa. 'AXi- Mcrraiu, ^ 8' 6s. El dp a rbv ttp&rov \i6jov 8iaa'^krouvA» To^ ^Xcucas ^xtv T&v &XXwv iroo-dv StuuovpYi^v &^ciUvovt Sftv flvai 8A«)j. bovp7oifi IXfuOcpCas t{)s ir^XcMt irdw dKpiP

70 The Republic [book

TOvrOlS) ^ Tt &XXo TMV TTCpl TaVTtt 1AI)&TtIoV ^ Kol ITttS, l<^,

B ols "yc oilSk vpoa-fyjtw ihv voOv Tovrwv o^Scvl ^^(rrai ; TA£ 8^; tinrovs XP^K'^^^t^^'^'^^ *^^^ ravpovs ivKA«fiivov$ Kal irtyrxi^ I&OVS \ro4o{)vTas Kal OdXarrav icnnroiioxiv Kal ppovrds Kal irdvra aZ rd roiavra 4) iii'/jo-ovTai ; *AXX' dTrcCpTfrai a^ois, 1^, )&'/JTa,¬ iaA£va,¬or6ab ja'/jtc iaivo)Uvois &

c &v Cx^^^ ^^ *^^^ ^ f 8iT)7oiTO 6 IvavrCcDs ^KcCvtp

D Tovra, ^drrw 8i Kal ^rrov Ij imh v6