DOCSLIB.ORG

“Rupture” in the Poets of the “War Generation”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Rupture” in the Poets of the “War Generation” Section – Literature GIDNI THE SPIRIT OF REBELLION AND THE AESTHETIC OF “RUPTURE” IN THE POETS OF THE “WAR GENERATION” Sorin Ivan, Assoc. Prof., PhD, ”Titu Maiorescu” University of Bucharest Abstract: In the landscape of outstanding aesthetic diversity of Romanian literature of the ‘40s, the ”War Generation” plays a special role. The young writers, mostly poets, grouped around the Albatros magazine, advocates the separation from the literary tradition, from the ”outdated” aesthetic canons, and the renewal of poetry. In their vision, poetry should descent in the immediate reality, inspire from the everyday existence, from its mundane, common, bleak aspects, from the ugly and sordid, on behalf of the genuine life, unfalsified by anachronistic canons, patterns and visions. The new aesthetic involves the refusal of aesthetics, exploitation of reality and existence in all respects, the aesthetic of ugliness, in an anti-aesthetic and ”antipoetic” vision. The poets write on behalf of the future, and their poetry is crossed by a messianic air. The war offers them a fruitful framework of objectification of their conception of poetry. Fundamentally polemical, the new poetry assumes a prophetic function in the dramatic wait for the new times. The aesthetic ”revolution” started by the young poets will be suddenly stopped yet by the institution of the communist regime in Romania. The future invoked by them in their polemical and messianic poems will turn to a nightmare. The ”War Generation” will become the ”Lost Generation”. Keywords: the war generation, aesthetic revolution, new poetry, messianism, the lost generation The “war generation” and the poetics of negation The literary landscape of the ‘40s has an unprecedented richness and aesthetic diversity in Romanian literature. A particular case during this age of literary effervescence is the “war generation,” the so-called “lost generation”, made up of young writers gathered, for the most part, around the Albatros magazine, edited by Geo Dumitrescu. Among them there are such names as Ion Caraion, Constant Tonegaru, Victor Torynopol, C. T. Lituon, Sergiu Ludescu, Ben Corlaciu, Alexandru Lungu, Mihail Crama, Sergiu Filerot, Veronica Porumbacu, Iordan Chimet, but other authors, too, recorded by literary history in various degrees. All of them share the idiosyncrasy towards the old world, towards a lifestyle having nothing in common with reality, defined by a philosophy of impassiveness towards canonical and academic literature, the desire to denounce “traditional” poetry, to prove its aesthetic caducity, its falseness and its deeply bookish nature, which turns it into an exhibit worthy of the museum of literature. Naturally, all of these opinions, especially those referring to poetry, are deeply arguable. Their justification has to do with the movements and quakes of youth psychology, with the dialectics of an impetuous becoming, which makes use of its strength and the disarming enthusiasm of its age. Youth, above all, warrants the young poets of the “war generation” in their protesting endeavour, and not necessarily their aesthetic arguments. This generation acts on the stage of literature and life in a tragic time of history, the Second World War. Therefore, the war is part of its historical and literary identity, summarized in the phrase “the war generation”. Historically and psychologically, it is a time of emergency and crisis, when irrationality, cynicism, savagery, cruelty, murder, genocide encroaches upon human existence, which they transform into a vast theatre of manifestation. A theatre of the absurd and suffering, in which the people are victims, the victims of ideologies and doctrines, the victims of the lack of reason and primary instincts, the victims of 664 Section – Literature GIDNI suffering and death. On the aesthetic level, the war is a complex thematic framework, which gives young poets a fertile and tragic ground of literary expression. In this context, the poetry of protest arises, in polemical and provocative metamorphoses, with violent and accusatory accents to the status quo, to history and human weakness. This poetry accuses the absurdity of existence, the tragic human crisis, dehumanization, alienation and cruelty of the human being. Against this background, it emerges the hope in new times, in the rebirth of man and of human existence, under the sign of reason and of the future. Thus, in such a framework of hope and expectation, it is crystallized the idea of “the new poetry”, to express rebirth, the dawn of a new era of man and his humanity. In a messianic enthusiasm, the young poets put human existence, in its ontological and aesthetic dimensions, under the auspices of the new, which they associate with hope, good, bright and fruitful future. It is a utopian projection that history will deny, in the cruellest way. A naive utopia to history, that will give them instead a bleak dystopia, the communism. The young writers, animated by revolts and ideals, angry on the present and confident in the future, weary and hopeful, will fall victim, in one form or another, to this historic nightmare, to this negative utopia, unfortunately, as real as possible. That is why, the "war generation" will become, on the levels of the history of literature and of the personal existence, the “lost generation”. The gesture of aesthetic separation of the ”war generation” will not crystallise in a literary movement per se. What was becoming, by the young writers’ assembling around the Albatros magazine, a promise of aesthetic coagulation and definition into an ideological shape of wide scope remained a fleeting moment, albeit remarkable, in the history of literature, once the magazine closed in the terrible conditions of censure during the war and in the historic post-war circumstances. History and the individual dramas and tragedies of many of this promising group of writers discouraged their desire for change that seemed to fall into place, broke the coherence and continuity of a process that was asserting itself. Many were silent for various reasons, a few died young (Constant Tonegaru, C. T. Lituon, Sergiu Ludescu), some recovered and evolved individually on their own aesthetic systems, free from any ideology. At the beginning of the ‘40s, however, their poetry shares the desire to deny, to dispute, to defy and to insult the petty bourgeois spirit of literature, the canonical literary mindset, defined, in the young people’s iconoclastic view, by convenience, by a laziness of thinking, by a barren cult of formal symmetries, by a betrayal of reality and bookish falsification, by sterility and incapacity. The arguments of the poets who denounce in often violent and sarcastic terms the mindset of their contemporaries or the aesthetic forms are arguable and are not always founded, especially from a literary point of view. There are, however, in the scope of these attacks, some vulnerable targets, some of them even of great literary quality, with aesthetic orientations that have more to do with tradition. A hint of denial floats throughout the whole inter-war period, as we have seen, from the first avant-gardists to the last surrealists. These defying attitudes, proclaiming the need for renewal, are in some way part of the tradition of protest, which began in the ‘20s with the manifestos written by Vinea, Voronca, Geo Bogza, etc. and which was carried through between the two wars by surrealists such as Gellu Naum, Gherasim Luca, Trost, Paul Păun, etc. A resounding and terrible iconoclastic endeavour is represented by Eugen Ionescu’s book Nu (No) (1934), where the young author criticises, among others, writers like Arghezi, Barbu, first-rank aesthetic creators, great experimenters, innovative authors, especially the poet of the 665 Section – Literature GIDNI Fitting Words, as far as the Romanian poetic language is concerned. It was a bright, mostly gratuitous critical exercice, a game of critical intelligence, for which the book was even awarded a prize, in the “young unpublished writers” category. Such movements and attitudes managed to bring a breath of innovating and avant-garde air in Romanian literature, with a considerable amount of manifestos and arts of poetry, but also with literary works proper. Thus, Romanian literature is not trapped in stale approaches, pledged to tradition, it is not dominated by inertia and a lack of reaction before the commandments of the new, but rather it defines itself as a dynamic place where ideas and aesthetic forms develop. The Separation from Tradition As regards the young authors on their way to asserting themselves at the beginning of the Second World War, their protest movement is a somewhat natural moment in these circumstances, which continues the rebellion and the desire to break with tradition, attesting the vitality of the literary spirit, objectified in countless metamorphoses. An aggravating circumstance of this movement is represented by the war, which amplifies the state of crisis and asserts the imperative need for change. The stalemates of history generate great mobilisation and insurrections of spirit, as forms of expressing inner tension and the crisis of the individual looking for a new spiritual identity. Let us not forget that the German expressionism formed before the First World War began, Dadaism was born during the war, and the Romanian avant-garde appeared at the end of it. Following the course of history, American postmodernism emerged in the ‘50s, after the Second World War and during the Korean War, against a severe
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romania's Cultural Wars: Intellectual Debates About the Recent Past
    ROMANIA'S CULTURAL WARS : Intellectual Debates about the Recent Past Irina Livezeanu University of Pittsburgh The National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h 910 17`" Street, N.W . Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 2000 6 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Contractor : University of Pittsburgh Principal Investigator: Irina Livezeanu Council Contract Number : 816-08 Date : March 27, 2003 Copyright Informatio n Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funde d through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicat e and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract o r Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER's own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows : (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of th e United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United State s Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale . * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by th e National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available b y the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Trainin g Act of 1983, as amended) .
    [Show full text]
  • Research Project for the Subject
    The Creator vs. the Creative Man in Romanian Literature (The period between the wars vs. the communist regime) Bagiu, Lucian Published in: Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bagiu, L. (2008). The Creator vs. the Creative Man in Romanian Literature (The period between the wars vs. the communist regime). Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica, 9(2), 121-130. http://www.uab.ro/reviste_recunoscute/index.php?cale=2008_tom2 Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 The Creator vs. the Creative Man in Romanian Literature (The period between the wars vs. the communist regime) - Research Project - asist.
    [Show full text]
  • Serban Foarta
    Traducerea textelor străine (nu mai puţin aceea,-n vers şi rimă, a basmului lui Charles Perrault) îi aparţine autorului antologiei, Şerban Foarţă • Excepţie fac, în ordinea intrării în scenă, fragmentele din Sei Şōnagon, Însemnări de căpătâi, trad. Stanca Cionca; Rudolf Kassner, Vrăjitorul, trad. Mihnea Moroianu; E.T.A. Hoffmann, Părerile despre viaţă ale motanului Murr, trad. Valeria Sadoveanu; Eric-Emmanuel Schmitt, Viaţa mea cu Mozart, trad. Lidia Bodea; Michelangelo Buonarroti, Sonetul V, trad. Eta Boeriu; Alan Brownjohn, Poem cu pisică rea, trad. Denisa Comănescu • La tălmăcirea poeziilor maghiarofone (şi anume, Pisicuţa-Piticuţa de Móricz Zsigmond, respectiv O cheamă Pis-Pis de Eszteró István) şi-a dat concursul Ildikó Gábos-Foarţă • Întreaga noastră gratitudine, în fine, tuturor celor care ne-au acordat copyrighturile de rigoare. Coperta: ANGELA ROTARU Ilustraţia copertei: ANDREI GAMARŢ ISBN 978-973-50-5054-2 Descrierea CIP este disponibilă la Biblioteca Naţională a României. Dario Bellezza, Miosotis, Sfortunata, La gattità din volumul Io, Arnoldo Mondadori Editore, 1983 © Heirs of Dario Bellezza Jorge Luis Borges, Beppo, A un Gato © Maria Kodama, 1995, used by permission of The Wylie Agency (UK) Limited Alan Brownjohn, A bad cat poem © Alan Brownjohn Maurice Carême, Le chat et le soleil din volumul L’arlequin; Il a neigé din volumul La lanterne magique; Si seul din volumul A cloche-pied © Fondation Maurice Carême, toate drepturile rezervate Robert Desnos, Le chat qui ne ressemblait à rien din volumul Destinée arbitraire © Editions Gallimard, Paris, 1975 Colette, Le petit chat noir © Anne de Jouvenel Eleanor Farjeon, Cats © The Estate of Eleanor Farjeon Eugène Ionesco, Rhinocéros (fragmente), din volumul Théâtre III © Editions Gallimard, Paris, 1963 Rudolf Kassner, Der Zauberer (fragment) din volumul Der Gott und die Chimäre.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Map of Knowledge And
    Humphry Davy George Grosz Patrick Galvin August Wilhelm von Hofmann Mervyn Gotsman Peter Blake Willa Cather Norman Vincent Peale Hans Holbein the Elder David Bomberg Hans Lewy Mark Ryden Juan Gris Ian Stevenson Charles Coleman (English painter) Mauritz de Haas David Drake Donald E. Westlake John Morton Blum Yehuda Amichai Stephen Smale Bernd and Hilla Becher Vitsentzos Kornaros Maxfield Parrish L. Sprague de Camp Derek Jarman Baron Carl von Rokitansky John LaFarge Richard Francis Burton Jamie Hewlett George Sterling Sergei Winogradsky Federico Halbherr Jean-Léon Gérôme William M. Bass Roy Lichtenstein Jacob Isaakszoon van Ruisdael Tony Cliff Julia Margaret Cameron Arnold Sommerfeld Adrian Willaert Olga Arsenievna Oleinik LeMoine Fitzgerald Christian Krohg Wilfred Thesiger Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant Eva Hesse `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas Him Mark Lai Clark Ashton Smith Clint Eastwood Therkel Mathiassen Bettie Page Frank DuMond Peter Whittle Salvador Espriu Gaetano Fichera William Cubley Jean Tinguely Amado Nervo Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Ferdinand Hodler Françoise Sagan Dave Meltzer Anton Julius Carlson Bela Cikoš Sesija John Cleese Kan Nyunt Charlotte Lamb Benjamin Silliman Howard Hendricks Jim Russell (cartoonist) Kate Chopin Gary Becker Harvey Kurtzman Michel Tapié John C. Maxwell Stan Pitt Henry Lawson Gustave Boulanger Wayne Shorter Irshad Kamil Joseph Greenberg Dungeons & Dragons Serbian epic poetry Adrian Ludwig Richter Eliseu Visconti Albert Maignan Syed Nazeer Husain Hakushu Kitahara Lim Cheng Hoe David Brin Bernard Ogilvie Dodge Star Wars Karel Capek Hudson River School Alfred Hitchcock Vladimir Colin Robert Kroetsch Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai Stephen Sondheim Robert Ludlum Frank Frazetta Walter Tevis Sax Rohmer Rafael Sabatini Ralph Nader Manon Gropius Aristide Maillol Ed Roth Jonathan Dordick Abdur Razzaq (Professor) John W.
    [Show full text]
  • ”Lost Generation”. the Phoenix Bird of Aesthetics Arising from the Refusal of Aesthetics
    CCI3 LITERATURE THE NEW POETRY AND THE NEW POETICS OF THE ”LOST GENERATION”. THE PHOENIX BIRD OF AESTHETICS ARISING FROM THE REFUSAL OF AESTHETICS Sorin Ivan, Prof., PhD, ”Titu Maiorescu” University of Bucharest Abstract: The poets of the Albatros magazine are the heart of a generation that aims to revolutionize literature and to create a new poetry. At the origin of this movement there lies an ontologically based aesthetic explanation: the desire of separation from the literary tradition and the aesthetic canons (a polemical and iconoclastic breakup), the need for poetic renewal in a time under the sign of urgency, of change and of desire for rebirth from the ruins of the war. In the young poets’ vision, poetry must descend from the metaphysical heavens of an empty aesthetics into the immediate reality, as an instrument of life, as a way of living. The new poetry is born from the ashes of an outdated aesthetics and from the ashes of time, with a new, messianic meaning, proclaiming the future and the new man. The poets of the Albatros magazine, and others, who write in the literary press of the time, thus create a revolutionary movement in the literary mentality and poetry. Out of the anti-poetic and anti- aesthetic ideology of this movement, a new aesthetic is born, from which the new poetry grows. In this context, Geo Dumitrescu is an iconic poet for the new aesthetics, raised from negation, and for the new poetry. It is interesting to see which are the defining elements of the anti-aesthetic and anti-poetic aesthetics and what the ”new poetry”, promoted by the war generation, means compared to the ”old poetry”.
    [Show full text]
  • Gidni 2 Literature 52 Poetry in a State of Emergency
    GIDNI 2 LITERATURE POETRY IN A STATE OF EMERGENCY. AESTHETIC FORMS OF OBJECTIFICATION OF THE NEW POETRY IN THE FIFTH DECADE Sorin Ivan, Prof., PhD., Postdoc Researcher, ”Titu Maiorescu” University of Bucharest Abstract: At the beginning of the fifth decade, poetry is in a state of emergency. The young poets of the war generation (the future Ŗlost generationŗ) do not want any longer to write as before and as in the immediate present of literature, as they explicitly state in their manifesto-texts. The state of emergency has an aesthetic dimension and a psychological one, and both converge in a common attitude towards literature: the rejection of aesthetics, the desire to assert a new poetic vision and a new literary canon.The new poetry of these years, defined by the poetsř attempt to revolutionize the canon, includes different forms of lyrical objectification, in a remarkable poetic variety, under the auspices of revolt, protest and aesthetic renewal. One of the poets who live dramatically the state of emergency is Ben. Corlaciu, a special lyrical voice of the generation, aesthetically interesting, representative for the poetics of the bohemian attitude, defiance and evasion as ways of developing the new poetry. Keywords: state of emergency, rejection of aesthetics, defiance, evasion, new poetry Boemul rebel bântuit de himera libertății Placheta Manifest liric (1945), de Ben. Corlaciu, se deschide cu un poem-motto, Cioclul, care aruncă o săgeată otrăvită, înmuiată în veninul sfidării, către lumea academică. Alternativa la condiţia de vagabond, de „golan‖, care, în esența ei, exprimă viaţa, dinamismul existențial, frenezia creatoare, este cea de academician ori chiar de preşedinte al Academiei, asociată cu sterilitatea, cu lipsa de vitalitate, cu o imagine solemnă care nu exprimă nimic.
    [Show full text]
  • Completare Trista La Un Jurnal Din 1949: Critica De Directie A
    Scris de corneliu.leu pe 14 ianuarie 2013, 13:56 Completare trista la un jurnal din 1949: Critica de directie a lamuririi si dumiririi (III) In memoria generatiei de confrati mai mari, cea a lui Mihu Dragomir, Dimitrie Stelaru, Neculai Tautu, George Dan,Tudor Musatescu, Geo Dumitrescu, Radu Boureanu, Ghita Dinu, Lucian Grigoresccu, Ion Vlad, Spiru Chintila, Petru Dumitriu, Gellu Naum, Laurentiu Fulga, Sasa Pana, Radu Tudoran, Alexandru Balaci, Mati Aslan,Eugen Schileru, Nicolae Margeanu, Nicolae Crisan, Nicolae Jianu, Mircea Marc, de la care am apucat sa invat ceva din lupta cu poncifele vremii. Asa s-a preluat din literatura burgheza termenul de „critica de directie” dandu-i-se continutul dorit de serviciile prop-agit si nu numai, unde respectivii se aflau in functii sau, dupa caz, deveneau colaboratori. Iar cea mai mare parte a generatiei mele literare a fost contaminata nu numai de totala neincredere intr-un asemenea aparat al criticii si cronicariei ci, chiar si de precautii tematoare. Care, uneori, s-au confirmat foarte tarziu; adica abia cand au iesit la iveala din arhivele securitatii dosarele unor confrati de ai nostri din lumea criticii literare. Sigur, intrucat in toate domeniile au existat asemenea cazuri, lucrurile nu mira. Dar nici nu putem spune ca demonetizarea pe care o constatam astazi in privinta genului literar respectiv nu are si asemenea cauze, de vreme ce, daca luam toti autorasii de recenzioare care ne deveneau colegi, ajungem la concluzia ca, pentru eficienta controlului „critic” asupra actului de creatie, partidul sau organele sale represive ar fi vrut chiar sa ne ducem viata „obsteasca” in colhozurile din Uniuni (a se citi „viata supravegheata”) in proportie de unu la unu.
    [Show full text]
  • Textul Narativ Despărţirea În Silabe La Capăt De Rând 2
    MINISTERUL EDUCAŢIEI NAŢIONALE Sofia Dobra COMUNICARE în limba română Manual pentru clasa a II-a Partea a II-a . Acest manual este proprietatea Ministerului Educaţiei Naţionale. Manualul şcolar a fost aprobat prin Ordinul ministrului educaţiei naţionale nr. 4781 din 13 octombrie 2014, în urma evaluării, şi este realizat în conformitate cu programa şcolară aprobată prin Ordinul ministrului educaţiei naţionale nr. 3418 din 19 martie 2013. Manualul este distribuit în mod gratuit, atât în format tipărit, cât şi în format digital, şi este transmisibil timp de patru ani şcolari, începând cu anul şcolar 2014–2015. Inspectoratul şcolar .................................................... Şcoala / Colegiul / Liceul .............................................. ACEST MANUAL A FOST FOLOSIT: Aspectul manualului*: Anul Anul Numele elevului Clasa format tipărit format digital şcolar la primire la predare la primire la predare 1 2 3 4 * Pentru precizarea aspectului manualului se va folosi unul dintre următorii termeni: nou, bun, îngrijit, neîngrijit, deteriorat. • Cadrele didactice vor verifica dacă informaţiile înscrise în tabelul de mai sus sunt corecte. • Elevii nu vor face niciun fel de însemnări pe manual. Redactor: SILVIU NICOLAE Coperta: ANGELA ROTARU Ilustraţia copertei: TERENTE ŞERBAN Ilustraţii: SILVIA MITREA, TERENTE ŞERBAN Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României Machetare şi design: ANGELA ROTARU DOBRA, SOFIA Paginare: CORINA RONCEA Comunicare în limba română: clasa a II-a / Sofia Dobra. – Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2014. © HUMANITAS,
    [Show full text]
  • No. 15 TRONDHEIM STUDIES on EAST EUROPEAN CULTURES
    No. 15 TRONDHEIM STUDIES ON EAST EUROPEAN CULTURES & SOCIETIES Constantin Iordachi CHARISMA, POLITICS AND VIOLENCE: THE LEGION OF THE “ARCHANGEL MICHAEL” IN INTER-WAR ROMANIA December 2004 Constantin Iordachi is Assistant Professor of Comparative History at the Central (XURSHDQ8QLYHUVLW\ &(8 %XGDSHVW+HJUDGXDWHGIURPWKH8QLYHUVLW\RI %XFKDUHVW %$ DQGWKH,QVWLWXWHRI,QWHUQDWLRQDO6WXGLHV8QLYHUVLW\RI/HHGV 0$ DQGKDVHDUQHGKLV3K'LQKLVWRU\DWWKH&(8,RUGDFKLLVVSHFLDOL]LQJ in the comparative social and institutional history of Central and Southeastern Europe, with an emphasis on citizenship studies, fascism and the history of historiography. He published numerous articles in various scholarly journals and edited books, mainly in Romanian, Hungarian and English. His book The Making of Citizenship in Southeastern Europe during the Long Nineteenth Ceuntry: The Case of Romania, is forthcoming with the CEU Press. ISSN 1501-6684 ISBN 82-995792-3-6 © 2004 Constantin Iordachi and the Program on East European Culture and Societies, a program of the faculty of Arts. Norwegian University of science and Technology. Trondheim studies on East European Cultures and Societies Editor: György Péteri Editorial board: Trond Berge, Tanja Ellingsen, Knut Andreas Grimstad, Arne Halvorsen, Sabrina P. Ramet We encourage submission to the Trondheim Studies on East European Culture and Societies. Inconclusion in the series will be based on anonymous review. Manuscripts are expected to be in English (exception is made for Norwegian 0DVWHUCVDQG3K'WKHVLV DQGQRWH[FHHGGRXEOHVSDFHGSDJHV3RVWDODGGUHVV
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Interculturelle Et Littérature
    Centrul de Cercetare Comunicare Interculturală şi Literatură, Facultatea de Litere, Universitatea “Dunărea de Jos”, Galaţi COMMUNICATION INTERCULTURELLE ET LITTÉRATURE NR. 1 (28) / 2019 Volum I Coordonatori: Simona Antofi, Nicoleta Ifrim, Oana Cenac Daniel Gălățanu, Elena Botezatu, Iuliana Barna Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă Cluj-Napoca 2019 Editor : Centrul de Cercetare Comunicare Interculturală şi Literatură, Facultatea de Litere, Universitatea „Dunărea de Jos”, Galaţi Director: Prof. univ. dr. Doiniţa Milea e-mail: [email protected] Redactor-şef: Prof. univ. dr. Simona Antofi e-mail: [email protected] Secretar de redacţie: Prof. univ. dr. Nicoleta Ifrim e-mail: [email protected] Redactori : Prof. univ. dr. Nicoleta Ifrim, Conf. univ. dr. Oana Cenac e-mail: [email protected],, [email protected] Rezumat în limba engleză / franceză : Prof. univ. dr. Nicoleta Ifrim, Conf. univ. dr. Oana Cenac, Prof. univ. dr. Simona Antofi, Prof. univ. dr. Daniel Gălățanu Administrare site şi redactor web : Prof. univ. dr. Nicoleta Ifrim Corectură: Prof.univ. dr. Nicoleta Ifrim, Conf. univ. dr. Oana Cenac, Prof. Marian Antofi Difuzare: Prof. univ. dr. Nicoleta Ifrim Consiliul consultativ: Academician Eugen Simion, Prof. univ. dr. Silviu Angelescu, Prof. univ. dr. Mircea A. Diaconu Adresa redacţiei: Centrul de Cercetare Comunicare Interculturală şi Literatură, Facultatea de Litere, Universitatea Dunărea de Jos”, Str. Domnească, nr. 111, Galaţi Cod poştal: 800008 Telefon: +40-236-460476 Fax: +40-236-460476 ISSN : 1844-6965 Communication Interculturelle et Littérature Cod CNCSIS 489 / 2008 Abonamentele se fac la sediul redacţiei, Str. Domnească, nr. 111, Galaţi, cod 800008, prin mandat poştal pe numele Simona Antofi. Preţurile la abonamente sunt: 3 luni – 30 lei; 6 luni - 60 lei ; 12 luni – 120 lei.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE VICTOR V. PAMBUCCIAN |ADDRESS, E-MAIL, TELEPHONE | Work: School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences Arizona State University - West campus, P O Box 37100 Phoenix, AZ 85069-7100 | e-mail: [email protected] Tel.: (602)-543-3021 |EMPLOYMENT | Professor of Mathematics, ASU West, Fall 2007 - | Associate Professor of Mathematics, ASU West, Fall 1999 - Spring 2007 | Assistant Professor of Mathematics, ASU West, Spring 1994 - Spring 1999 | Teaching Assistant at the University of Michigan (9/89-5/93), and Lecturer in Mathematics (9/93-12/93) | French and Mathematics teacher at the \National Sports Academy in Lake Placid", Lake Placid, NY (9/88-6/89) |EDUCATION |University of Michigan (9/89 - 8/93) Ph. D. in Mathematics (August 1993) Major Area: Logic, Foundations of Geometry Dissertation Title: The Axiomatics of Euclidean Geometry Thesis Adviser: Prof. Andreas Blass | University of Bucharest, Faculty of Mathematics (1978-1982) Master of Sciences in Mathematics, June 1982 M.S. Thesis Title: The problem of the axiomatic foundation of Euclidean geometry (120pp.) Thesis Adviser: Prof. Kostake Teleman | \Deutsches Lyzeum", Bucharest, Rumania (1974-1978) Baccalaureat (\Abitur") diploma, September 1978 |ACADEMIC AWARDS and SCHOLARSHIPS | 1st; 2nd prizes of the \Gazeta Matematica" (Bucharest, 1975; 1976) | 3rd; 1st; 2nd; 1st; 2nd prizes at the \Bundeswettbewerb Mathematik" (West German Mathematical Competition) (Bonn, 1976; 1977; 1977; 1978; 1978) | Two prizes at the \Prindle, Weber & Schmidt Undergraduate Math. Competition" II
    [Show full text]
  • Ion Creangă Clasic Al Artei Naive
    Apare sub egida UniuniiExpres Scriitorilor din România cultural Anul III, nr. 6 (30), iunie 2019 • Apare lunar 24 pagini Aproape de aproape Aproape de aproape în rădăcina asta ceva se străduie să redevină iar noi rămâne să ne întrebăm dacă să trecem cu Homo vederea blândețea lui nimicitoare academicus urmează o rostogolire și poate o zguduită claritate sub vremi care falsifică și uită atunci cu greu mai recunoaștem grația electrică a vechilor bărbați pe care îi văzusem mai demult cum își cărau cămășile coclite pag. 4 prin mlaștina care îi dogorea și se plantau cu brațele în cruce cu un condor pe fiecare umăr Alexandru ZUB bărbații care vroiau să moară și își zdrobeau și oa- sele ca mama mamei lor și ies în ploaie să-mi dezleg frânghia de care sunt legat Gellu Naum Liviu Ioan STOICIU Al. CISTELECAN Nu e de ajuns talentul, trebuie să aibă și... Radu FLORESCU, Dan Bogdan HANU pag. 3 O fată fericită (Raymond Han) Constantin COROIU POESIS pag. 7 pag. 12,13 G. Călinescu și „fapta văzută din viitor” Christian W. SCHENK pag. 5 Florin FAIFER Rainer Maria Rilke - poezie universală pag. 15 Îndrăgostiți într-o lume de minunății Adrian Dinu RACHIERU pag. 5 Constantin DRAM Un histrion mediatic. Adrian Păunescu (I) pag. 18 Catharsis! Theodor CODREANU pag. 6 Gellu DORIAN Numere în labirint (IV) pag. 21 De ce n-au devenit Ipoteștii și Botoșanii... Victor DURNEA pag. 7 Al. CISTELECAN Radu Rosetti pag. 23 O poetă „miss România” (sau invers) Constantin PRICOP pag. 9 Magda URSACHE Direcția critică (XXIV) Proletcult după proletcult - ..
    [Show full text]