DOCSLIB.ORG

Radio Free Europe in Paris

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Radio Free Europe in Paris: the Paradoxes of an Ethereal Opposition by Ioana Macrea-Toma Submitted to Central European University Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Constantin Iordachi Second Reader: Professor Istvan Rev CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2008 Statement of copyright: “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any copies such made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author”. CEU eTD Collection i Abstract This paper explores, interprets and contributes to the studies regarding Radio Free Europe in a cold War context. By focusing on the Romanian Department of RFE and further on to Monica Lovinescu’s cultural broadcasts we intend to provide new insights about a type of cultural liberal advocacy framed by an international context and a local intellectual tradition. By resorting to communication theory, intellectual history and socio-history of intellectuals we will place Monica Lovinescu’s message within an intellectual historical interaction which is responsible for the establishment of a literary canon and for the present discourse about the past. A concentric contextualization will gradually introduce our case study, repositioning it into history after a classicized solemn locating it on a transcendental pedestal. The elements of novelty of our undertaking are multifold: it provides factual information about a phenomenon only personally evoked, it applies a complex set of theoretical methodologies and last, but not least, it uses a comparative comprehensive historical approach in order to discard ethical, Manichean or self-centered visions about the Communist period. CEU eTD Collection ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................1 CHAPTER I. RADIO FREE EUROPE: THEORETICAL ASSUMPTIONS..........11 1. THE STATE OF AFFAIRS...........................................................................................13 2.“EFFECTS” PARADIGM .............................................................................................16 3. INTERACTIONIST PARADIGM....................................................................................18 4. INTELLECTUAL HISTORY AND HISTORY OF INTELLECTUALS .....................................22 5. COMBINING THREADS.............................................................................................25 CHAPTER II. RADIO FREE EUROPE WITHIN THE COLD WAR ....................27 1. ELITIST PEDAGOGY.................................................................................................29 2. EMERGENCE, STRUCTURE, EVOLUTION ...................................................................33 3. AUDIENCE’S IMAGE ABOUT RFE .............................................................................40 CHAPTER 3. THE ROMANIAN DEPARTMENT...................................................47 1. STATISTICS….........................................................................................................49 2. PROGRAMS .............................................................................................................53 3. ORIENTATIONS OF THE PERSONNEL .........................................................................60 4 REFLECTING/CONSTRUCTING DISSENT .....................................................................64 CHAPTER 4. ADVOCATING DEMOCRACY ON A CULTURAL BASIS............76 RADIO FREE EUROPE BETWEEN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL MILITANCY...............................................................................................................76 1. QUESTIONS: RESHAPING TOTALITARIAN PARADIGM ................................................78 2. DOUBLE EXILE…OR MORE.....................................................................................82 3. IDEOLOGICAL ORIENTATION ...................................................................................89 4. NATIONALISM - THE PROBLEM OF LOST TERRITORIES ..............................................92 5. CONSTANTIN NOICA’S CASE ...................................................................................94 6. SYNCHRONISM UNDER COMMUNISM ........................................................................97 7. EPILOGUE: RADICALIZATION OF BELLIGERENCE IN A REVIVALIST SCHEME ..............102 CONCLUSIONS: WHY DOES MONICA LOVINESCU MATTER .....................107 1. MUSEIFICATION....................................................................................................107 2. SALT IN FOOD.......................................................................................................112 BIBLIOGRAPHY: ....................................................................................................115 CEU eTD Collection iii Introduction Radio Free Europe holds a unique position in the annals of international broadcasting. Considered as “the most influential politically oriented radio station in history”1, it played several roles, as propagandistic instrument within the Cold War context, as informative alternative arena counterbalancing party-dominated press and, last but not least, as a subject of communication theory development. Moreover, Radio Free Europe is not only immanently promoted and consecrated as a liberating voice; it is also retroactively acknowledged as an important actor in the “crusade for freedom”, practically retaining at the moment an undisputedly respectable place within the wide range of actors and institutions which belong to communism. The societies from Eastern Europe Soviet Union exposed to international broadcast numbered almost 370 million people who fed daily on uncensored news in order to grasp worldwide events but mostly to deal with daily local realities, disasters or thorny issues. Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty managed to combine the theoretical American message advocating democracy with the pragmatic goal of supplying an audience with reliable intra-national and inter- national based news. The target of our thesis will be that of analyzing how national-based departments within a Cold War institutional framework deal with the propagandistic and professional CEU eTD Collection informing task. Choosing as a case study the Romanian section, we shall try to answer the question of how is a Cold War ideology reframed or reflected by national exiled 1 Arch Puddington, Broadcasting Freedom: the Cold War Triumph of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2000), p. ix. 1 editors and in what RFE’s role actually consist of when propagating freedom. Taking into account a cultural program which was highly appreciated by the Romanian audience and which enjoyed the status of a consecrating institution, we will argue that, despite the synchronizing appeals to opposition to communism, the Romanian cultural broadcasts lack the insight awareness of social dynamism, enforcing an elitist discourse and a vertical communication between intellectuals and the masses. In this way, advocating change along the rough lines of Cold War rhetoric leads to endorsing existing polarizations by means of the ethereal medium of radio endowed with a symbolic meta- capital. In order to understand the unintended consequences of such a liberal-conservative program, we shall pursue a concentric analysis, highlighting the institutional and intellectual peculiarities of Radio Free Europe and then of the Romanian Department. Airing news not about the country from which the broadcasts originated but about the countries that were the broadcast target makes Radio Free Europe special, all the more so since the United States had not shown interest before and during World War II– unlike the Bolshevik and Nazi regimes - in taking part in the global war of airwaves. Therefore, what distinguishes Radio Free Europe from Voice of America or BBC is that it is not national with a strong international content, but international with a local content. It does not only seek to provide neutral information in standardized journalistic style, but to act as “surrogate domestic broadcasters”2 while “keeping hope alive among the satellite countries of the USSR and improving the chances for a gradual change towards 3 CEU eTD Collection more open societies” . An inherent paradox of the whole diplomatic history of Cold War 2 Michael Nelson, War of the Black Heavens, The Battles of Western Broadcasting in the Cold War, Forward by Lech Walesa (London: Brassey’s, 1997), p. xiv. 3 This is Radio Free Europe’s aim as it is expressed in 1954 by Cord Meyer, chief of the International Organizations Division of CIA. See Michael Nelson, op. cit., p. 44. 2 arrangements would be that of focusing on containment initiatives as well as on coordinated campaigns to support underground resistance movements in countries behind the Iron Curtain. The propaganda broadcasting acquires the features of a contradictory strategy, aimed at raising people’s consciousness without fueling internal upheavals. The studies concerned with the history of Radio Free Europe as a whole collaterally touch upon the paradoxes of voicing freedom. In this respect, Radio Free Europe as an object
Recommended publications
  • Romania's Cultural Wars: Intellectual Debates About the Recent Past

    Romania's Cultural Wars: Intellectual Debates About the Recent Past

    ROMANIA'S CULTURAL WARS : Intellectual Debates about the Recent Past Irina Livezeanu University of Pittsburgh The National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h 910 17`" Street, N.W . Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 2000 6 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Contractor : University of Pittsburgh Principal Investigator: Irina Livezeanu Council Contract Number : 816-08 Date : March 27, 2003 Copyright Informatio n Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funde d through a contract or grant from the National Council for Eurasian and East European Researc h (NCEEER). However, the NCEEER and the United States Government have the right to duplicat e and disseminate, in written and electronic form, reports submitted to NCEEER to fulfill Contract o r Grant Agreements either (a) for NCEEER's own internal use, or (b) for use by the United States Government, and as follows : (1) for further dissemination to domestic, international, and foreign governments, entities and/or individuals to serve official United States Government purposes or (2) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of th e United States Government granting the public access to documents held by the United State s Government. Neither NCEEER nor the United States Government nor any recipient of this Report may use it for commercial sale . * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by th e National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available b y the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Trainin g Act of 1983, as amended) .
  • Research Project for the Subject

    Research Project for the Subject

    The Creator vs. the Creative Man in Romanian Literature (The period between the wars vs. the communist regime) Bagiu, Lucian Published in: Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bagiu, L. (2008). The Creator vs. the Creative Man in Romanian Literature (The period between the wars vs. the communist regime). Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica, 9(2), 121-130. http://www.uab.ro/reviste_recunoscute/index.php?cale=2008_tom2 Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 The Creator vs. the Creative Man in Romanian Literature (The period between the wars vs. the communist regime) - Research Project - asist.
  • Strategies of 'Aesopian Language' in Romanian Literary Criticism Under

    Strategies of 'Aesopian Language' in Romanian Literary Criticism Under

    SLOVO , VOL. 24, NO . 2 (A UTUMN 2012), 75-95. The Rhetoric of Subversion: Strategies of ‘Aesopian Language’ in Romanian Literary Criticism under Late Communism ANDREI TERIAN Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania This paper analyses the subversive strategies of ‘Aesopian language’ with reference to the discourse of the Romanian literary criticism written under late communism (1971-1989). The first two sections of the paper signal certain gaps and inconstancies in defining Aesopian language and in delineating its forms of manifestation; at the same time, they explain the spread of this subversive practice in the political and cultural context of Romanian communism. The following three sections analyse the manner in which Aesopian language materialized in the writings of some of the most important contemporary Romanian critics: Mircea Iorgulescu, Nicolae Manolescu and Mircea Martin. The final section of the study considers a revision of the current definitions of Aesopian language (through the concept of “triggers” theorized in this paper), a new classification of the rhetorical strategies acting globally in a subversive text, as well as a re-evaluation of the relevance of Aesopian language in the context of ‘resistance through culture’, which was the main form of opposition against the communist regime in Romania. INTRODUCTION In the Foreword to his famous pamphlet Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), V.I. Lenin cautioned his readers that the paper had been written ‘with an eye to the tsarist censorship’; therefore, he had found it essential to render his subversive doctrine ‘with extreme caution, by hints, in an allegorical language – in that accursed Aesopian language – to which tsarism compelled all revolutionaries to have recourse whenever they took up the pen to write a “legal” work’.
  • Communism and Post-Communism in Romania : Challenges to Democratic Transition

    Communism and Post-Communism in Romania : Challenges to Democratic Transition

    TITLE : COMMUNISM AND POST-COMMUNISM IN ROMANIA : CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION AUTHOR : VLADIMIR TISMANEANU, University of Marylan d THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FO R EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 LEGAL NOTICE The Government of the District of Columbia has certified an amendment of th e Articles of Incorporation of the National Council for Soviet and East European Research changing the name of the Corporation to THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH, effective on June 9, 1997. Grants, contracts and all other legal engagements of and with the Corporation made unde r its former name are unaffected and remain in force unless/until modified in writin g by the parties thereto . PROJECT INFORMATION : 1 CONTRACTOR : University of Marylan d PR1NCIPAL 1NVEST1GATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 81 1-2 3 DATE : March 26, 1998 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded by contract with the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research . However, the Council and the United States Government have the right to duplicate an d disseminate, in written and electronic form, this Report submitted to the Council under thi s Contract, as follows : Such dissemination may be made by the Council solely (a) for its ow n internal use, and (b) to the United States Government (1) for its own internal use ; (2) for further dissemination to domestic, international and foreign governments, entities an d individuals to serve official United States Government purposes ; and (3) for dissemination i n accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United State s Government granting the public rights of access to documents held by the United State s Government.
  • From Periphery to Centre.The Image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe

    From Periphery to Centre.The Image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive From Periphery to Centre.The Image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe Şipoş, Sorin and Moisa, Gabriel and Cepraga, Dan Octavian and Brie, Mircea and Mateoc, Teodor University of Oradea, Romania, University of Padova, Italy 2014 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59276/ MPRA Paper No. 59276, posted 15 Oct 2014 12:04 UTC Edited by: Sorin Şipoş, Gabriel Moisa, Dan Octavian Cepraga, Mircea Brie, Teodor Mateoc From Periphery to Centre. The Image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe Editorial committee: Delia-Maria Radu Roxana Ivaşca Alexandra Bere Ionuţ Ciorba CONTENTS Sorin ŞIPOŞ, Dan Octavian CEPRAGA, From Periphery to Centre. The Image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe ………..………..… 5 I. PERIPHERY VIEWED FROM THE CENTRE …………………..… 13 Lorenzo RENZI, «Terra Romena» ……………………………………..… 15 Ion Alexandru MIZGAN, The Crusades – Cause of Tension between Eastern and Western Europe ………………………………………...…..…21 Florin DOBREI, Transylvanian “Schismatics”, “Heretics” and “Infidels” in the Vision of 13th-16th Century Catholic Europe ……………………..… 47 Ioan-Aurel POP, 16th Century Venetian Bailiffs‟ Reports on Realities in the Ottoman Empire …………………………………………………..… 61 Ion EREMIA, A False Theory Still Persists at the Eastern Border of Latinity .. 76 Delia-Maria RADU, From Centre to the Periphery and the Other Way Round ………………………………………………………..……..… 88 Teodor MATEOC, Identity and Race. The Problem of Otherness in Contemporary Cultural Studies …………………………………...……..…96 II. SELF-IMAGES AT EUROPE’S EASTERN BORDERS
  • Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe

    Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe

    Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe Michael Shafir Motto: They used to pour millet on graves or poppy seeds To feed the dead who would come disguised as birds. I put this book here for you, who once lived So that you should visit us no more Czeslaw Milosz Introduction* Holocaust denial in post-Communist East Central Europe is a fact. And, like most facts, its shades are many. Sometimes, denial comes in explicit forms – visible and universally-aggressive. At other times, however, it is implicit rather than explicit, particularistic rather than universal, defensive rather than aggressive. And between these two poles, the spectrum is large enough to allow for a large variety of forms, some of which may escape the eye of all but the most versatile connoisseurs of country-specific history, culture, or immediate political environment. In other words, Holocaust denial in the region ranges from sheer emulation of negationism elsewhere in the world to regional-specific forms of collective defense of national "historic memory" and to merely banal, indeed sometime cynical, attempts at the utilitarian exploitation of an immediate political context.1 The paradox of Holocaust negation in East Central Europe is that, alas, this is neither "good" nor "bad" for the Jews.2 But it is an important part of the * I would like to acknowledge the support of the J. and O. Winter Fund of the Graduate Center of the City University of New York for research conducted in connection with this project. I am indebted to friends and colleagues who read manuscripts of earlier versions and provided comments and corrections.
  • Doctoral Research Scientific Report

    Doctoral Research Scientific Report

    Invest in people! EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND Sectorial Operational Programme for Human Resources Development 2007 – 2013 Priority Axis 1 "Education and training in support of growth and development of knowledge based society" Key Area of Intervention 1.5 "Doctoral and post-doctoral programs in support of research" Project Title: "Romanian Culture and European cultural models: Research, timing, sustainability ' Beneficiary: Romanian Academy Contract identification number:: POSDRU/159/1.5/S/136077 Doctoral Research Scientific Report Tutor supervisor: Ph.D. Wilhelm Dancă PhD Student: Marcel Lazăr Cozmuţa Bucharest, 2015 GENERATION ‘27 Tutor supervisor: Ph.D. Wilhelm Dancă Ph.D. Student: Marcel Lazăr Cozmuţa This paper was accomplished within the project “Romanian culture and European cultural models:research, timing, sustainability”, cofinanced by European Union and Romanian Government from European Social Fund through the Sectorial Operational Programme for Human Resources Development 2007‐2013, financing contract no. POSDRU/159/1.5/S/136077. Bucharest, 2015 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................3 GENERATION ’27......................................................................................................................................................5 ARŞAVIR ACTERIAN’S LIFE....................................................................................................................................15
  • ROMANIAN IDENTITY and CULTURAL POLITICS UNDER CEAU§ESCU: an EXAMPLE from PHILOSOPHY1 Katherine Verdery

    ROMANIAN IDENTITY and CULTURAL POLITICS UNDER CEAU§ESCU: an EXAMPLE from PHILOSOPHY1 Katherine Verdery

    ROMANIAN IDENTITY AND CULTURAL POLITICS UNDER CEAU§ESCU: AN EXAMPLE FROM PHILOSOPHY1 Katherine Verdery Studies of intellectuals, their relation to power, and their role in shaping social ideologies' occupy an important place in twentieth-century social science (e.g., Mannheim 1955, Gramsci 1971, Shils 1958, Gouldner 1979, Foucault 1978 and 1980, Bourdieu 1975 and 1988, Konri.\d and Szelenyi 1979, Bauman 1987). While earlier writings (such as Shils 1958 and Coser 1965) treatec;i intellectual activity as "free-floating" and as relatively independent of political interest, the consensus of the 1970s and 1980s emphasizes, rather, that intellectual production is situated, embedded in political and social relations. Different theorists have different views concerning the political character of scientific findings and scholarly debates. Some emphasize the ways in which knowledge develops practices that contribute to subjection (e.g., Bauman 1987, Foucault 1978); others focus on the politics that occur within afield of intellectual activity and on how that field is tied to political and eco~omic processes in. the society as a whole (e.g., .Abbott 1988, Bourdieu 1975, 1988). Still others examine how the discourses of "intellectuals build up ideological premises that either construct or challenge social hegemonies (e.g., Simmonds-Duke 1987). This essay, and the study of which it forms a part (Verdery 1991), follow the third of these routes. My objective is to investigate how intellectual activity in Romania under ceau~escu contributed to reproducing
  • Absurdistan Refacut Cu Headere Ultimul.P65

    Absurdistan Refacut Cu Headere Ultimul.P65

    Dorin Tudoran (n. 30 iunie 1945, Timi[oara). Absolvent al Facult\]ii de Limb\ [i Literatur\ Român\ a Universit\]ii din Bucure[ti, pro- mo]ia 1968. Este Senior Director, pentru Comunicare [i Cercetare, membru al conducerii executive a Funda]iei Interna]ionale IFES, Washington D.C., Statele Unite, [i redactor-[ef al revistei democracy at large. C\r]i de poezie: Mic tratat de glorie (1973), C`ntec de trecut Akheronul (1975), O zi `n natur\ (1977), Uneori, plutirea (1977), Respira]ie artificial\ (1978), Pasaj de pietoni (1978), Semne particulare (antologie, 1979), De bun\ voie, autobiografia mea (1986), Ultimul turnir (antologie, 1992), Optional Future (1988), Viitorul Facultativ/Optional Future (1999), T`n\rul Ulise (antologie, 2000). C\r]i de publicistic\: Martori oculari (`n colaborare cu Eugen Seceleanu, 1976), Biografia debuturilor (1978), Nostalgii intacte (1982), Adaptarea la realitate (1982), Frost or Fear? On the Condition of the Romanian Intelectual (traducere [i prefa]\ de Vladimir Tism\neanu, 1988), Onoarea de a `n]elege (antologie, 1998), Kakistokra]ia (1998). Pentru unele dintre c\r]ile sale, autorul a primit Premiul Uniunii Scriitorilor (1973, 1977, 1998), Marele Premiu al Asocia]iilor Scriitorilor Profesioni[ti ASPRO (1998), Premiul Uniunii Scriitorilor din Republica Moldova (1998), Premiul revistei Cuv`ntul Superlativele anului (1998). I s-a decernat un Premiu Special al Uniunii Scriitorilor (1992) [i este laureatul Premiului ALA pe anul 2001. www.polirom.ro © 2006 by Editura POLIROM Editura POLIROM Ia[i, B-dul Carol I nr. 4, P.O. BOX 266, 700506 Bucure[ti, B-dul I.C. Br\tianu nr. 6, et.
  • Romanian Exiles During the Most-Favored-Nation Period, 1974-1988 ______

    Romanian Exiles During the Most-Favored-Nation Period, 1974-1988 ______

    COLD WARRIORS IN THE AGE OF DÉTENTE AND DIFFERENTIATION: ROMANIAN EXILES DURING THE MOST-FAVORED-NATION PERIOD, 1974-1988 ____________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Fullerton ____________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History ____________________________________ By Maryam Morsali Sullivan Thesis Committee Approval: Robert McLain, Department of History, Chair Cora Granata, Department of History Bogdan Suceava, Department of Mathematics Spring Semester, 2017 ABSTRACT Throughout modern history, groups of people have emigrated without the ability to return home because of the regime in power. While living in exile, they form or join new communities. They also work to determine their role and relation to their host and home countries. This study focuses on the activities and culture of Romanian exiles in the West from 1974 to 1988. These were the years that the United States granted Most- Favored-Nation status to Nicolae Ceaușescu’s Romania. During this time, American foreign policy ranged from détente to differentiation. The culture of Romanian exiles during the Cold War developed into working to combat communism and lessen Romanian suffering, as well as serving as the voice of and preserving democratic Romania. Exiles never gave up hope that communism could be overthrown. When it became evident that their political activities could not achieve regime change, a group of Romanian exiles decided to diversify their goals. This included focusing on humanitarian aid and preserving Romanian democratic traditions. They allied with the neoconservative wing of the U.S. Congress that originated in the Democratic Party to focus more on humanitarian victories, raise awareness in the West of what they considered to be the truth about Romania, and find means to provide a threat to or weaken Ceaușescu.
  • Exile As Severance Alexandru Boldor Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Exile As Severance Alexandru Boldor Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 Exile as severance Alexandru Boldor Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Comparative Literature Commons Recommended Citation Boldor, Alexandru, "Exile as severance" (2005). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2225. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2225 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. EXILE AS SEVERANCE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Interdepartmental Program in Comparative Literature by Alexandru Boldor B.A., Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj, 1995 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2003 August, 2005 Table of Contents Abstract . iii An Overview of the Concepts of “Exile” and “Severance” . 1 Preamble . 1 Exile: A Historical Overview . 12 Romanian Exile Literature . 18 Exile in the Modern World . 21 Variants of Exile . 27 Etymological Aspects of the Term “Exile” . 33 Exile and Severance: The Mechanics of a Phenomenon . 40 Definition of the “Severance” as an Element of Exile . 42 Etymology of “Severance” . 45 Literary Corollaries of the Concept. 49 Tristan Tzara: The Evasion of “The Approximate Man”. 58 A Puzzling Personality . 58 The Early Years. 63 Zürich . 76 The “Dégoût” and the Beginnings of an Ars Poetica .
  • Political Antisemitism in Romania? Hard Data and Its Soft Underbelly Shafir, Michael

    Political Antisemitism in Romania? Hard Data and Its Soft Underbelly Shafir, Michael

    www.ssoar.info Political antisemitism in Romania? Hard data and its soft underbelly Shafir, Michael Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Shafir, M. (2012). Political antisemitism in Romania? Hard data and its soft underbelly. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 12(4), 557-603. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-445667 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Political Antisemitism in Romania? 557 Political Antisemitism in Romania? Hard Data and its Soft Underbelly MICHAEL SHAFIR As in many other former communist countries of East Central Europe1, antisemitism in Romania resurged almost concomitantly with the demise of the former regime2. Empirical research on antisemitism, however, emerged only considerably later and did not take off as a main focus until the establishment of the National Institute for the Study of the Holocaust in Romania ”Elie Wiesel” (INSHREW) in 2005. This does not imply that the subject of Jews, attitudes to Jews measured by instruments such as stereotypic perceptions and/or ”social distance”, or attitudes toward controversial Romanian historical figures linked to the country’s antisemitic past was not tangentially or even directly tackled on occasion. What lacked until 2005, however, was an effort to systematically (among other instruments, employing a standard questionnaire capable of rendering comparative results) place under focus the phenomenon in its synchronic and diachronic unfolding.