Maritime Museum of San Diego – Part II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maritime Museum of San Diego – Part II 1 Newsletter Volume 43, Number 5, May 2016 Contacts Work in Progress President: Don Dressel (909) 949-6931 April 20, 2016 E-Mail: [email protected] Reporter: Dave Yotter Vice President: Bill Schultheis (714) 366-7602 The meeting began with an excellent PowerPoint E-Mail: [email protected] slide presentation given by Randy Biddle, principally on Secretary: Paul Payne the methods of research and the building of a ship (310) 544-1461 model based on the book for model makers by Gene Treasurer: Larry Van Es Johnson. Many of the SMA members enjoyed this (714) 936-0389 presentation very much with lots of questions for E-Mail: [email protected] Randy, who provided all the answers. There was a Editor, Don Dressel minor problem with the projector, but the situation was (909) 949-6931 quickly resolved. 908 W. 22nd Street The second aspect of this evenings meeting was Upland, CA 91784-1229 the fact that there were MANY modern models on E-mail: [email protected] display brought in by a number of SMA members, the Web Manager: Doug Tolbert: number, for the first time, exceeding the number of (949) 644-5416 sailing ship models. Web Site www.shipmodelersassociation.org USS Porter (DD-356) – Don Dressel Meeting – Wed. May 18, 7 PM, Red Don brought in a resin cast kit model by Blue Cross Building, 1207 N. Lemon, Navy of the USS Porter (DD-356) in 1/350 scale. The kit Fullerton, CA. 92832 was purchased a built a number of years ago. As with most resin kits, there was a LOT of cleanup and sanding Officers meeting –Wed., June 1, required, with many “holes” and other imperfections 2016, 7 PM, Bob Beech’s house, cleaned up prior to painting. It was a “break” from 130 Clove Pl. Brea, CA. 92821 – building wooden sailing ship models but was a lot of (714) 529-1481. fun to build. According to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, the USS Porter was the lead ship in her class of destroyers in the United States Navy. She was the third Navy ship named for Commodore David Porter and his son, Admiral David Dixon Porter. 2 She was laid down by the New York Shipbuilding Corporation at Camden in New Jersey on 18 December 1933, launched on 12 December 1935 by Miss Carlile Patterson Porter and commissioned at Philadelphia on 27 August 1936, Commander Forrest B. Royal in command. After shakedown in waters off Northern Europe, Porter visited St. John’s, Newfoundland, for ceremonies in honor of the coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth in May 1937 and was at the Washington Navy Yard during the Boy Scout Jamboree, June-July 1937. Then reassigned to the Pacific Fleet, she transited the Panama Canal and arrived at San Francisco, California 5 August 1937. She operated continuously with the Pacific Fleet until the outbreak of World War II, homeported at San Diego, California. On 5 December 1941, Porter got underway from Pearl Harbor, escaping the Japanese attack by two days. She patrolled with cruisers and destroyers in Hawaiian waters before steaming in convoy 25 March 1942 for the west coast. She operated off the west coast with Task Force 1 (TF1) for the next 4 months. Returning to Pearl Harbor in mid-August, she trained in Hawaiian waters until 16 October when she sortied with TF 16 and headed for the Solomon Islands. On 26 October 1942, TF 16 exchanged air attacks with strong Japanese forces northeast of Guadalcanal in the Battle of the Santa Cruz Islands. During the ensuing action, Porter was torpedoed, and, after the crew had abandoned ship, was sunk by gunfire from Shaw (DD-373). Authorities differ as to the source of the torpedo which sank Porter. Author Eric Hammel states she was sunk by a single torpedo, part of a three-torpedo spread fired from Japanese Submarine I-21. However, author Richard B. Frank states that Japanese records don’t support this, and that, more likely, an errant torpedo from a ditching U.S. TBF Avenger hit Porter and caused the fatal damage. Her name was struck from the Navy List 2 November 1942. Porter earned one battle star for World War II service. Her general characteristics were: Displacement: 1,850 tons; Length: 381 feet (116 m); Beam: 36 feet, 2 inches (11.02 m); Draft: 10 feet, 5 inches (3.18 m); propulsion: 50,000 shp; Speed: 35 knots; Complement: 194; Armament c. 1942: 1 X Mk33 Gun Fire Control System; 8 X 5”/38cal SP (4 x 2); 2 X 40mm AA; 6 X 20mm AA; 2 X Depth Charge stern racks. Battle of Jutland (from Wikipedia) The Battle of Jutland (German: Skagerrakschlacht, the Battle of Skagerrak) was a naval battle fought by the British Royal Navy’s Grand Fleet under Admiral Sir John Jellico, against the Imperial German Navy’s High Seas Fleet under Vice-Admiral Reinhard Scheer during the First World War. The battle was fought from 31 May to 1 June 1916 in the North Sea, near the coast 3 of Denmark’s Jutland Peninsula. It was the largest naval battle and the only full-scale clash of battleships in the war. It was the third fleet action between steel battleships, following the smaller but more decisive battles of the Yellow Sea (1904) and Tsushima (1905) during the Russo-Japanese War. By Grandiose – Won work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia,org/w/indedx.php?curid=23511058 Germany’s High Seas Fleet’s intention was to lure out, trap and destroy a portion of the Grand Fleet, as the German naval force was insufficient to openly engage the entire British fleet. This formed part of a larger strategy to break the British blockade of Germany and to allow German mercantile shipping to operate. Meanwhile, Great Britain’s Royal Navy pursued a strategy to engage and destroy the High Seas Fleet, or keep the German force contained and away from Britain’s own shipping lanes. 4 The German plan was to use Vice-Admiral Franz Hipper’s fast scouting group of five modern battlecruisers to lure Vice-Admiral Sir David Beatty’s battlecruiser squadrons into the path of the main German fleet. Submarines were stationed in advance across the likely routes of the British ships. However, the British learned from signal intercepts that a major fleet operation was likely, so on 30 May Jellicoe sailed with the Grand Fleet to rendezvous with Beatty, passing over the locations of the German submarine picket lines while they were unprepared. The German plan had been delayed, causing further problems for their submariners, which had reached the limit of their endurance at sea. On the afternoon of 31 May, Beatty encountered Hipper’s battlecruiser force long before the Germans had expected. In a running battle, Hipper successfully drew the British vanguard into the path of the High Seas Fleet. By the time Beatty sighted the larger force and turned back towards the British main fleet, he had lost two battlecruisers from a force of six battlecruisers and four battleships, against the five ships commanded by Hipper. The battleships, commanded by Rear-Admiral Sir Hugh Evan-Thomas, were the last to turn and formed a rearguard as Beatty withdrew; now drawing the German fleet in pursuit towards the main British positions. Between 18:30, when the sun was lowering on the western horizon, back-lighting the German forces, and nightfall at about 20:30, the two fleets – totaling 250 ships between them –directly engaged twice. Fourteen British and eleven German ships were sunk, with great loss of life. After sunset, and throughout the night, Jellicoe maneuvered to cut the Germans off from their base, hoping to continue the battle the next morning, but under the cover of darkness Scheer broke through the British light forces forming the rearguard of the Grand Fleet and returned to port. Both sides claimed victory. The British lost more ships and twice as many sailors, and the British press criticized the Grand Fleet’s failure to force a decisive outcome, but Scheer’s plan of destroying a substantial portion of the British fleet also failed. The German’s “fleet in being” continued to pose a threat, requiring the British to keep their battleships concentrated in the North Sea, but the battle confirmed the German policy of avoiding all fleet-to-fleet contact. At the end of the year, after further unsuccessful attempts to reduce the Royal Navy’s numerical advantage, the German Navy turned its efforts and resources to unrestricted submarine warfare and the destruction of Allied and neutral shipping which by April 1917 triggered the United States of America’s declaration of war on Germany. Subsequent reviews commissioned by the Royal Navy generated strong disagreement between supporters of Jellicoe and Beatty concerning the two admirals’ performance in the battle. Debate over their performance and the significance of the battle continues to this day. The group consisting of David Okamura, Mark Deliduka and Bob Zmuda are preparing models for a fleet operation to commemorate the 100th Anniversary of the Battle of Jutland that is to be held aboard the USS Iowa (BB-61) at the USS Iowa Museum, located at the Port of Los Angeles in San Pedro. We should have more specific information about the battle reenactment over the Memorial Day weekend at the May meeting. WW1 Battleships and Battlecruisers – Bob Zmuda Bob brought in several models of WW1 Battleships and Battlecruisers in scales of 1:1200 and 1:1250. These were built from kits by Navis, Superior, Authenticast and Comit. The models include the battleship HMS Dreadnought, the dreadnought battleship HMS Iron Duke, the battlecruiser HMS Invincible, the pre- dreadnought battleship Deutschland, the Queen Elizabeth class battleship HMS Warspite, the battleship SMS Ostfriesland, the battlecruiser SMS Derfflinger and the (WWII) battleship HMS Vanguard.
Recommended publications
  • US Fleet Organization, 1939
    US Fleet Organization 1939 Battle Force US Fleet: USS California (BB-44)(Force Flagship) Battleships, Battle Force (San Pedro) USS West Virginia (BB-48)(flagship) Battleship Division 1: USS Arizona (BB-39)(flag) USS Nevada (BB-36) USS Pennsylvania (BB-38)(Fl. Flag) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 1-9 VOS Battleship Division 2: USS Tennessee (BB-43)(flag) USS Oklahoma (BB-37) USS California (BB-44)(Force flagship) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 2-9 VOS Battleship Division 3: USS Idaho (BB-42)(flag) USS Mississippi (BB-41) USS New Mexico (BB-40) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 3-9 VOS Battleship Division 4: USS West Virginia (BB-48)(flag) USS Colorado (BB-45) USS Maryland (BB-46) Air Unit - Observation Sqn 4-9 VOS Cruisers, Battle Force: (San Diego) USS Honolulu (CL-48)(flagship) Cruiser Division 2: USS Trenton (CL-11)(flag) USS Memphis (CL-13) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 2-4 VSO Cruiser Division 3: USS Detroit (CL-8)(flag) USS Cincinnati (CL-6) USS Milwaukee (CL-5) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 3-6 VSO Cruise Division 8: USS Philadelphia (CL-41)(flag) USS Brooklyn (CL-40) USS Savannah (CL-42) USS Nashville (CL-43) Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 8-16 VSO Cruiser Division 9: USS Honolulu (CL-48)(flag) USS Phoneix (CL-46) USS Boise (CL-47) USS St. Louis (CL-49)(when commissioned Air Unit - Cruiser Squadron 8-16 VSO 1 Destroyers, Battle Force (San Diego) USS Concord (CL-10) Ship Air Unit 2 VSO Destroyer Flotilla 1: USS Raleigh (CL-7)(flag) Ship Air Unit 2 VSO USS Dobbin (AD-3)(destroyer tender) (served 1st & 3rd Squadrons) USS Whitney (AD-4)(destroyer tender)
    [Show full text]
  • World War II at Sea This Page Intentionally Left Blank World War II at Sea
    World War II at Sea This page intentionally left blank World War II at Sea AN ENCYCLOPEDIA Volume I: A–K Dr. Spencer C. Tucker Editor Dr. Paul G. Pierpaoli Jr. Associate Editor Dr. Eric W. Osborne Assistant Editor Vincent P. O’Hara Assistant Editor Copyright 2012 by ABC-CLIO, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data World War II at sea : an encyclopedia / Spencer C. Tucker. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-59884-457-3 (hardcopy : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-59884-458-0 (ebook) 1. World War, 1939–1945—Naval operations— Encyclopedias. I. Tucker, Spencer, 1937– II. Title: World War Two at sea. D770.W66 2011 940.54'503—dc23 2011042142 ISBN: 978-1-59884-457-3 EISBN: 978-1-59884-458-0 15 14 13 12 11 1 2 3 4 5 This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an eBook. Visit www.abc-clio.com for details. ABC-CLIO, LLC 130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911 Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911 This book is printed on acid-free paper Manufactured in the United States of America To Malcolm “Kip” Muir Jr., scholar, gifted teacher, and friend. This page intentionally left blank Contents About the Editor ix Editorial Advisory Board xi List of Entries xiii Preface xxiii Overview xxv Entries A–Z 1 Chronology of Principal Events of World War II at Sea 823 Glossary of World War II Naval Terms 831 Bibliography 839 List of Editors and Contributors 865 Categorical Index 877 Index 889 vii This page intentionally left blank About the Editor Spencer C.
    [Show full text]
  • Canc Frp: Apr 2013
    Canc frp: Apr 2013 OPNAVNOTE 5450 Ser N1/121028 10 APR 2012 OPNAV NOTICE 5450 From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SEQUENTIAL AND MAJOR COMMAND LISTS Encl: (1) FY-12 to FY-16 Sequential Command List (2) FY-12 to FY-16 Major Sea Command List (3) FY-12 to FY-16 Major Shore Command List (4) FY-12 to FY-16 Major Defense Attaché List 1. Purpose a. To publish the fiscal year (FY) 2012 (FY-12) to FY 2016 (FY-16) sequential command, major command and major Defense Attaché lists. b. To establish the membership and responsibilities of the Major Command Review Board (MCRB). c. To publish procedures for submitting requests for changes to the sequential and major command lists. 2. Background. The designation of unrestricted line (URL) and certain restricted line (RL) O-6 command billets as major sea or major shore commands are required to ensure that the most qualified individuals are placed in these demanding billets. Officers selected for major command are recognized for their proven managerial and technical expertise, professional qualifications, and exceptional leadership ability. 3. MCRB a. Membership. The MCRB shall consist of the following members: (1) Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) Director, Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13) (co-chair); OPNAVNOTE 5450 10 APR 2012 (2) Commander, Navy Personnel Command (co-chair); (3) Director, Expeditionary Warfare Division (OPNAV (N95)); (4) Director, Surface Warfare Division (OPNAV (N96); (5) Director, Submarine Warfare Division (OPNAV (N97)); (6) Director, Air Warfare Division (OPNAV (N98)); (7) Commander, Naval Surface Force, U.S. Atlantic Fleet; (8) Commander, Naval Air Force, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Battle of the Eastern Solomons, 24 August 1942
    Battle of the Eastern Solomons 24 August 1942 Japanese Combined Fleet: Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto (aboard IJN Yamato) Battleship: IJN Yamato - Captain Takayanagi Escort Carrier: IJN Taiyo Destroyer Division 7: Captain Konishi IJN Akebono - LCDR Nakagawa IJN Ushio - CDR Uesugi 3rd Fleet (Main Body): Vice Admiral Nagumo (aboard IJN Shokaku) Carrier Division 1: Vice Admiral Nagumo IJN Shokaku - Captain Arima Embarked Strike Group: LCDR Seki 26 Zeros 27 Vals (Aichi D3A1) 18 Kates (Nakajima B5N2) Embarked Strike Group: Lt. Takahashi 25 Zeros 27 Vals (Aichi D3A1) 18 Kates (Nakajima B5N2) Destroyer Division 10: Captain Abe IJN Kazegumo - CDR Yoshida IJN Yugumo - CDR Semba IJN Makikumo - CDR Fujita IJN Akigumo - CDR Soma Destroyer Division 16: IJN Hatsukaze - CDR Takahashi Unattacked: IJN Akizuki Close Support of Carriers (Vangaurd Force): Rear Admiral Abe (embarked IJN Hiei) Battleshp Division 11: Rear Admiral Abe IJN Hiei - Captain Nishida IJN Kirishima - Captain Iwabuchi Cruiser Division 7: Rear Admiral Nishimura IJN Kumano - Captain Tanaka IJN Suzuya - Captain Kimura Cruiser Division 8 IJN Chikuma - Captain Komura Destroyer Squadron 10: Rear Admiral Kimura (embarked IJN Nagara) IJN Nagara - Captain Naoi (Flagship) IJN Nowaki - CDR Kora IJN Maikaze - CDR Naksugi Destroyer Squadron 17 IJN Tanikaze - CDR Katsumi 1 Detached Carrier Strike Force: Rear Admiral Hara (Embarked IJN Tone) Light Carrier: IJN Ryujo - Captain Kato Embarked Strike Group: Notomi 23 Zeros 9 Kates (Nakajima B5N2) Heavy Cruiser: IJN Tone - Captain Anibe Destoyer Division 16:
    [Show full text]
  • Segatron: Segment-Aware Transformer for Language Modeling and Understanding
    Segatron: Segment-Aware Transformer for Language Modeling and Understanding He Bai,1 Peng Shi,1 Jimmy Lin,1 2 Yuqing Xie,1 Luchen Tan,2 Kun Xiong,2 Wen Gao,3 Ming Li1 2 1David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo 2 RSVP.ai 3 School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University {he.bai, peng.shi, jimmylin, yuqing.xie, mli}@uwaterloo.ca, {lctan, kun}@rsvp.ai, [email protected] Abstract sentences and paragraphs for language modeling. Although vanilla position encoding can help the transformer be aware Transformers are powerful for sequence modeling. Nearly of the token position by assigning a unique index to each all state-of-the-art language models and pre-trained language models are based on the Transformer architecture. However, token, the token index in a sentence, sentence index in a para- it distinguishes sequential tokens only with the token posi- graph, and paragraph index in a document are all implicit. tion index. We hypothesize that better contextual represen- Such segmentation information is essential for language mod- tations can be generated from the Transformer with richer eling, as tokens in different segments of context hold differ- positional information. To verify this, we propose a segment- ent significance for next token prediction. If the Transformer aware Transformer (Segatron), by replacing the original token model can be aware of the segment position of each con- position encoding with a combined position encoding of para- text token, we hypothesize that better context representations graph, sentence, and token. We first introduce the segment- will be encoded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the US Navy Into an Effective
    The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeff T. Reardon August 2008 © 2008 Jeff T. Reardon All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 by JEFF T. REARDON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Marvin E. Fletcher Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT REARDON, JEFF T., Ph.D., August 2008, History The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942-1943 (373 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Marvin E. Fletcher On the night of August 8-9, 1942, American naval forces supporting the amphibious landings at Guadalcanal and Tulagi Islands suffered a humiliating defeat in a nighttime clash against the Imperial Japanese Navy. This was, and remains today, the U.S. Navy’s worst defeat at sea. However, unlike America’s ground and air forces, which began inflicting disproportionate losses against their Japanese counterparts at the outset of the Solomon Islands campaign in August 1942, the navy was slow to achieve similar success. The reason the U.S. Navy took so long to achieve proficiency in ship-to-ship combat was due to the fact that it had not adequately prepared itself to fight at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Comint and the Sinking of the Battleship Yamato
    DOCID: 3949745 Rear Admiral L. R. Schulz, USN. Ret. Comint and the Sinking of the Battleship Yamato ,·, - ~ . ' ;i ' ·':ti, f;, ( Early in 1944 the giant ) apancse battleship Y arnillo, 1 Later, in October 1944, Yamato was involved· in the followitt~ repairs for torpedo damage,i joined the fleet at Battle for Leyte Gulf in the Philippines, as part of the Lingga Roads south of Singapore: She then moved to Center Force (Force .. A'") of the First Suiking Force. Tawitawi in the Sulu Archipelago near the northeast This force was subjected to heavy air attack. and .Y11m11to coast of Bornro. In June 1944 she participated in the received several bomb hits. Nevertheless, its ships lat« Battle of the Philippine Sea, althou~h she played no broke out into the Philippine Sea and procttcied sou~ si~nific<int role. along the east coast of Samar. anacking the lightly built aircraft carriers of the amphibious support forces and threatening U.S. ships supporting the Leyte Gulf landing ' In ;.1ddition ro C:ominr. rht m>1in sourct of information for rhiJ a~•- One Amttican escort carrier and thrtt ~csr:royerJ arriclt is the hook entirlecl C.111,,.Up,111 of the P•rifi& W n. rnmpiled by were sunk, and ~eral ()(hers were damagN by gunfire the Navy from daca of the Srrattgic.Rombing Survty and published hy from the Japanese force, which in turn was deterred by tht' U.S. Govtrnmenc Prinlin,i: Offke in I 946. Tht' CTF '8 Acrion bomb and torpedo attacks and withdrew before breaking · Rt"purt uf 31 May 19'1' h.ts bttn most valu1.bl1: from rhr stiindpoinr of through to the landing area.
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations Graduates!
    June 20, 2019 Edition HIGHLIGHTS Congratulations Graduates! “Graduation Friday” New NWC President Summer Camp Opportunities Pell Bridge 50th 4th of July Preview And More! Students of U.S. Naval War College's (NWC) 2019 graduating class participate in a commencement ceremony on Dewey Field, June 14. The graduating class of 2019 included 318 resident students of the Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Army, Coast Guard, federal civilian employees and 110 international students. Addition- Inside This Issue ally, 1,080 students completed coursework through NWC's College of Distance Education programs. (U.S. Navy photo by Jaima Fogg/Released) Around the Station 2-5 NEWPORT, R.I. -- U.S. Naval War than 500 graduates were in attendance to Celebrate the 4th 6 College graduated more than 1,500 cross the stage on historic Dewey Field. Fleet & Family 7 students on Friday, June 14, in a Secretary of the Navy Richard V. ceremony at Naval Station Newport Spencer delivered the keynote address, Meat & Potatoes 8 overlooking Narragansett Bay. describing the challenging geopolitical The graduates are officers in the U.S. picture facing the nation’s military and MWR 9 Navy, Marine Corps, Army, Air Force urging the new graduates to play a and Coast Guard, in addition to civilian leadership role. Now Hear This 10-11 employees of the Department of Defense “The influence of sea power on and other U.S. federal agencies. They today’s global commerce goes beyond Traffic/Pell Bridge 12 were joined by international military anything Alfred Thayer Mahan could officers hailing from 73 nations that are have imagined when he helmed this Around the Fleet 13-15 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Solomons Naval Campaign: a Paradigm for Surface Warships in Maritime Strategy
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1985 The Solomons naval campaign: a paradigm for surface warships in maritime strategy. McKearney, T. J. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/21550 x, CALIF01 £ £ NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS THE SOLOMONS NAVAL CAMPAIGN: A PARADIGM FOR SURFACE WARSHIPS IN MARITIME STRATEGY by T. J. McKearney September 1985 Thesis Advisor Wayne P. Hughes, Jr. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited, T 224405 SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Data Entered) READ INSTRUCTIONS REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM I. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER 4. TITLE (and Subtitle) 5. TYPE OF REPORT 4 PERIOD COVERED The Solomons Naval Campaign: A Paradigm Master's Thesis; for Surface Warships in Maritime Strategy September 198 5 6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER 7. author^; 8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERf*) T* J. McKearney 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND AC3RESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASK AREA 4 WORK UNIT NUMBERS Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California 93943-5100 11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE Naval Postgraduate School September 1985 Monterey, California 93943-5100 13. NUMBER OF PAGES 276 U. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 4 ADORESSf// dl Heron! from Controlling Oftlce) 15. SECURITY CLASS, (ol thta report) Unclassified 1 5a. DECLASSIFICATION/ DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE 16. DISTRIBUTION ST ATEMEN T (ol this Report) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ol the abatract entered In Block 20, It different from Report) 18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse aide It neceaaary and Identity by block number) Solomons Naval Campaign Surface Combatant Task Forces World War II War gaming 20.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Autumn Edition
    2013 Autumn Edition Commander General Report to the Order Dedication of the Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz Statue On September 2, 2013 on a bright Hawaiian morning, over 500 people, including a large contingent of Naval Order Companions, attended the dedication ceremony of the Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz statue. The dedication of this nine foot sculpture took place on Pier Foxtrot Five on Ford Island in Pearl Harbor adjacent to the Battleship USS Missouri. It is located forward of the USS Arizona Memorial. In attendance were members of the Nimitz family who had earlier in the week toured Admiral Nimitz’ headquarters and home located in Makalapa, Pearl Harbor, with the current U.S. Pacific Fleet Commander Admiral Cecil D. Haney, USN. During the ceremony, Admiral Haney told the audience “I continue to be humbled by the opportunity to sail in Admiral Nimitz’ wake as U.S. Pacific Fleet Commander and feel even more closely connected after having spent time with his descendants. As we toured where Admiral Nimitz lived and worked here at Pearl Harbor, we shared personal insights on a legendary warrior who was so instrumental to our victory in Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz statue and the USS Missouri the Pacific, and whose legacy we proudly preserve in the Fleet today.” the intricacies and requirements of logistics, organizational skill, ability to accept and act on ambiguous intelligence and Former Secretary of the Navy and Assistant Secretary of profound facility for evaluating his subordinates with the Defense Gordon England in his remarks spoke of the willingness to make changes in his command structure when measure of the man and his accomplishments pointing out warranted.
    [Show full text]
  • Inseratserie 430 X
    Ocean Arts: Paintings & Sculpture Inspired by the Sea Science: Locomotion Croatia’s Island of Vis Denmark’s GLOBAL EDITION Bubbling May 2008 Number 23 Corals Profile Pascal Bernabe Cedric Verdier Fitness for Divers Ecology Cool & Colourful Hammerhead Sharks Cornwall1 X-RAY MAG : 23 : 2008 COVER PHOTO BY STEVE JONES silver www.seacam.com MARK WEBSTER DIRECTORY X-RAY MAG is published by AquaScope Media ApS Frederiksberg, Denmark www.xray-mag.com PUBLISHER SENIOR EDITOR & EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Michael Symes Peter Symes [email protected] [email protected] contents CO-EDITORS PUBLISHER Andrey Bizyukin - Features & CREATIVE DIRECTOR Arnold Weisz - News, Features Gunild Pak Symes Michael Arvedlund - Ecology [email protected] Tony White - Photography Scott Bennett - Travel PUBLISHER Edwin Marcow - Sharks & GENERAL MANAGER HARALD APELT CORRESPONDENTS [email protected] John Collins - Ireland Enrico Cappeletti - Italy ASSOCIATE EDITORS Gary Myors - Tasmania & REPRESENTATIVES: Marcelo Mammana - Argentina Russia Editor & Rep: Svetlana Murashkina - Russia Andrey Bizyukin, Moscow Barb Roy - WA, USA [email protected] Robert Aston - CA, USA Nonoy Tan - The Philippines South East Asia Editor & Rep: Catherine GS Lim, Singapore CONTRIBUTORS THIS ISSUE [email protected] Kurt Amsler Harald Apelt Malaysia Editor & Rep: Michael Arvelund, PhD Simon Kong, Kuala Lumpur Scott Bennett [email protected] Pascal Bernabé Not yet subscribed to Andrey Bizyukin, PhD Florida Editor & Rep: CPT Kevin Cowan X-RAY MAG? Sign up now! Jen Hennessey, Miami Steve Jones It’s FREE! QUICK! EASY! [email protected] Simon Kong Catherine GS Lim click here... ADVERTISING Wolfgang Pölzer International sales rep: Cindy Ross Arnold Weisz (Americas & Asia) Gunild Symes [email protected] Michael Symes Peter Symes International sales rep: Cedric Verdier Harvey Page (Europe & Africa) [email protected] Mark Webster Arnold Weisz 31 41 49 67 71 plus..
    [Show full text]
  • US DESTROYERS 193445 Pre-War Classes
    US DESTROYERS 193445 Pre-war classes DAVE MCCOMB ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD • 162 US DESTROYERS 193445 Pre-war classes DAVE MCCOMB ILLUSTRATED BY PAUL WRIGHT © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 5 • The Treaty Classes: 1,500-Ton Destroyers • The Treaty Classes: 1,850-Ton Destroyer Leaders • The Post-Treaty Classes TOWARD A TWO-OCEAN WAR 18 • Modifications • Mobilization DESTROYERS IN ACTION 22 • The Atlantic and Mediterranean • The Pacific LOOKING BACK 43 SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY 46 APPENDICES 47 • Dimensions and Design Specifications • Recognition Features INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com US DESTROYERS 1934–45 PRE-WAR CLASSES INTRODUCTION The destroyer force with which the United States entered World War II was the product of twenty years of peace, 1919–1939. On the nation’s economic front, these two decades couldn’t have been more different. Following a brief recession after World War I, the American economy expanded at an unprecedented rate and in 1929 gross national product reached one-third of the world total. Conversely, that October’s stock-market crash ushered in the Great Depression, a decade of hardship at home and around the world. The fortunes of the American shipbuilding industry were nearly the reverse. During the four years after the war ended, deliveries dropped to less than 5 percent of the World War I peak and stayed there until 1938. This near collapse brought plant closings, layoffs, and a corresponding loss of expertise that jeopardized the industry’s future ability to rebound – a circumstance decried in 1944 by no less than the US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Ernest J.
    [Show full text]