DOCSLIB.ORG

Easter 1956.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Easter 1956.Pdf Cables: “Kitty Malta’* Telephones: Central 4028 * THE*STARS*CO. * Exclusive Bottlers In Malta and Gozo for The Kitty-Kola Co. Ltd., London 165/6 FLEUR-DE-LYS, BIRKIRKARA£MALTA Malta’s First-class Mineral Water Manufacturers OUR SPECIALITY—THE FOLLOWING SOFT DRINKS PINEAPPLE LEMONADE ORANGE GINGER BEER i f GRAPE FRUIT i f DRY GINGER i f STRAWBERRY TONIC WATER LIME JUICE SODA WATER Suppliers for N.A.A.F.I., Malta When you are serving in Malta, afloat or ashore, always call for ★ STAR’S* REFRESHERS * AND SEE THAT YOU GET THEM ********************************************* A JOB ASSURED BEFORE you leave the Services is encouraging. I SHORT BROTHERS HARLAN D* LIMITED have the jobs. Have you the qualifications ? ---------------------------------------------------- • W e need EN GIN EERS and TECHNICAL ASSISTANTS with University Degrees. National Certificates or the equivalent, for development work on aircraft, servo-mechanisms, guided missiles, auto-pilots and electronic and hydraulic research, in short, men qualified in mechanical or electrical engineering, mathematics, physics and with experience or an interest In aircraft and in related matters. To such as these we can offer a satisfactory career. If you are interested why not talk it over when you are on leave. Apply giving educational background to: STAFF APPOINTMENTS OFFICER, P.O. BO X 241, BELFAST, quoting S.A. 92. THE COMMUNICATOR 1 /»•<»#*I# in touch withm u r p h y ' I I Lo o L n - ~ _ J^ = > O /*=» <=* j O >V Our Admiralty Type 618 Marine Communications Equipment meets the needs of all kinds of ships. It consists of an M.F./H.F. receiver, separate M.F. and H.F. transmitters, and a power pack. The whole equipment is designed to rigid Admiralty specifications. M U R P H Y RADIO (ELECTRONICS DIVISION) WELWYN GARDEN CITY, HERTFORDSHIRE c r c i € e ftece#ers Specially suited for M o n ito rin g Field Tests La b o ra to ry Superbly engineered and of advanced design, the two models offered posses excellent electrical characteristics and are robustly constructed for service in any d»- mate. The “ 770R” has continuous AM/FM cover­ age from 19 mc/s to 16S mc/s; the “ 770U” from 150 me s to 500 mc/s. Both incorporate 6 position turret tuning assemblies of unique design and giving high reliability. Self-contained when operated from A.C. mains and with provision for use on external power supplies. Fully descriptive literature with illustrations and performance curves available on request. Manufactured by STRATTON & CO. LTD., BIRMINGHAM, 31 THE COMMUNICATOR The Magazine of the Communications Branch, Royal Navy EASTER, 1956 VOL. 10. No. I CONTENTS page page Editorial ...................................................... 4 H.Q. A llied N aval F orces C entral Commissioning F o r e c a s t ............................ 4 Europe, F ontainbleau ... ... ... 32 F oreword by C aptain of The Signal Birds of a F eather ... ... ... 33 School ...................................................... 5 T he Aircraft C arrier Squadron ... 34 Letters to the Editor ... ... ... 5 T urkish Delight ... ... ... ... 37 Long D istance VHF Propagation by South Atlantic ......................................... 39 Ionospheric Scatter ............................ 8 he riginal remlin Far East ...................................................... II T O G ... ... ... 40 The G unboat Communicator ................ 15 A merica and West Indies ................ 42 Communicators at Work ................ 16 C alling all R eserves ............................ 43 H.M. A ustralian F leet— 1955 ................ 18 H ome Station ......................................... 45 East In d i e s ...................................................... 19 F leet Air Arm ......................................... 53 With a Low, Mocking La u g h ................ 23 G oing the R ounds in “ M ercury” ... 59 A utomatic T riangulation ... ... 24 C ommunications G azette ... ... ... 63 Mediterranean ......................................... 26 Promotions and R etirements ................ 64 Editor: Lieutenant (C) N. F awcett, r n . Treasurer: Instructor Lieutenant K. O. Bright, b.sc., r.n . Art Editor: Commd. P.T. Officer E. J. M acey, r.n. Secretary: Wren F uller / Instructor Lt. Commander T. R. Smart, b.a.,b.sc., a.m.i.e.e., r.n. Editorial Staff: ^Chief Wren P. N. K elly Business, Production and Advertisement Manager: Mr. Edgar Sercombe, 2 Station Hill, Farnham, Surrey. CONTRIBUTIONS All MSS., photographs and cartoons should be sent to the Editor at H.M.S. “ Mercury”, as below. These will be returned to the senders only if asked for, and responsibility for them cannot be accepted by the Editor. Subscription Rates for 1956 are as follows: For the whole year ......................................... 6/- post free For each issue ... ... ... ... ... 1/10 or 2/2 post free Bulk orders from commands, ships or establishments, 2 /- per copy, post free. The Magazine is published at Eas'er, Summer and Christmas. Some back numbers are obtainable. * * * * Cheques and/or postal orders should be made payable and sent to: The Editor, T he Communicator. H.M.S. “ Mercury” . East Meon, near Petersfield, Hampshire. PUBLISHED AT H.M.S. “ MERCURY” 4 THE COMMUNICATOR EDITORIAL COMMISSIONING FORECAST Contributions have continued to flow in and we 1956 hope you will once more enjoy pleasant reading. April H.M.S. Lynx South Atlantic Unfortunately, due to difficulties in the printing East Indies trade, we have been unable to print articles, which April H.M.S. Loch Killisport arrived at the last minute. To ensure getting in a April H.M.S. Cardigan Bay Far East few words from as many as possible we regretfully April H.M.S. Big bury Bay America and had to shorten several articles. West Indies You will notice two different comments on the April H.M.S. Acute Dartmouth Magazine in the pages that follow. The editorial Squadron staff always welcomes such suggestions. Our motto April H.M.S. Jamaica Mediterranean is “Send us the material and we will do our best to May H.M.S. Agincourt 4th Destroyer print it.” Squadron In his foreword to the Christmas number, the May H.M.S. Aisne 4th Destroyer Captain of the Signal School remarked that we are Squadron an Allied branch; we are therefore particularly May H.M.S. Barrosa 4th Destroyer pleased to print an article from COMNAVCENT Squadron and hope to be including other articles from NATO May H.M.S. Corunna 4th Destroyer Countries in succeeding numbers. Squadron There has been a big exodus of the editorial staff May H.M.S. Murray 2nd Training since the last number. Lieutenant Commander Grey Squadron goes to H.M.S. Newcastle and Instructor Lieutenant May H.M.S. Torquay 5th Frigate Harper to H.M.S. Tamar. We wish them every good Squadron fortune in their new appointments and look forward May H.M.S. Albion General Service to reports from our special correspondents in the Commission Far East. Good wishes also to P.O. Wren Kirk who Far East left us for civilian life after doing yeoman service June H.M.S. Concord as secretary. June H.M.S. Keppei 2nd Training There will be competitions for the best article, Squadron photograph and cartoon in the Summer number. June H.M.S. Mounts Bay America and Details will be found on page 17. Make certain that West Indies there are plenty of entries. July H.M.S. Waterwitch 5th Fishery Protection and Minesweeping Squadron TROUBLE WITH LOOSE LEAVES July H.M.S. Warrior Trials Carrier vice The leaves of the loose leaf ACP’s, particularly Bulwark the procedure handbooks, are very easily torn at the July H.M.S. Newfoundland Far East punch holes. It is not generally known that linen July H.M.S. Pellew 2nd Training reinforcing washers for the holes can be obtained Squadron on your stationery demand under S.O. Code No. July H.M.S. Girdieness Guided Missile 68-30. A spare half-hour spent reinforcing the holes Ship will prevent much frustration from torn pages. July H.M.S. Loch Lomond East Indies THE COMMUNICATOR Foreword hy CAPTAIN OF THE SIGNAL SCHOOL With an early Easter, the leave period looming in The following taBle showing (he difference o f the sight and going-to-prcss time at hand I had more or numBers on the roster for advancement lo the rate less decided that there was little o f real significance shown as in FeBruary 1956 is o f interest:— to write aBout in a foreword for this issue. Then on Portsmouth Devonport Chatham 2Q(h h'eBruary no less than four major changes to C.Y.S. '» «* our lives were announced—The New Pay Code, Y.S. n » JO New Engagements, Centralised Drafting and Centralised Advancement rosters. C.P.O. Tel. By the time you read this you will all have digested, P.O. Tel. these important announcements and thought aBout Ldg. Tel. them in great detail. Nevertheless I would like to To any of you who are particularly well placed take this opportunity of letting you know briefly for advancement at the present Lime and who feel how. as I see it a t present, the Communication that the comBination of the rosters may result in a Branch is likely to Be affected. longer wailing lime I can give the assurance that This is clearly no place to discuss the new pay steps are Being taken la ensure that this does nol code except to express gratitude for what we are aBout to receive and to note with satisfaction a To those who are by domestic arrangements likely levelling of Basic rates Between the communication to Be adversely affected By the prospect o f central­ and seamen Branch. ised drafting—and there are Bound to Be some— A particular feature of (he new engagement I would say “ Look ahead and think o f the overall scheme is the first long service period of nine years, advantages to the majority in the future." which has the over riding merit that any junior rating I am delighted to see that elsewhere in this numBer worth his salt should Be aBle to look forward lo we have been critisised and as the Editor says, this passing for Petty Officer rate Before (he end o f his is a challenge.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armed Forces' Pay Review Body 47Th Report 2018
    Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body – Forty-Seventh Report 2018 Armed Forces’ Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body Forty-Seventh Report 2018 Chair: John Steele Cm 9677 Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body Forty-Seventh Report 2018 Chair: John Steele Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Defence by Command of Her Majesty July 2018 Cm 9677 © Crown copyright 2018 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/office-of-manpower-economics ISBN 978-1-5286-0435-2 CCS0318277118 07/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body TERMS OF REFERENCE The Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body provides independent advice to the Prime Minister and the Secretary of State for Defence on the remuneration and charges for members of the Naval, Military and Air Forces of the Crown. In reaching its recommendations, the Review Body is to have regard to the following considerations: • the need to recruit, retain and motivate suitably able and qualified people taking account of the particular circumstances of Service life; • Government policies for improving public services, including the requirement on the Ministry of Defence to meet the output targets for the delivery of departmental services; • the funds available to the Ministry of Defence as set out in the Government’s departmental expenditure limits; and, • the Government’s inflation target.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal 21 – Seminar – Malaya, Korea & Kuwait
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 21 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2000 Copyright 200: Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361-4231 Printed by Fotodirect Ltd Enterprise Estate, Crowhurst Road Brighton, East Sussex BN1 8AF Tel 01273 563111 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal N B Baldwin CB CBE Vice-Chairman Group Captain J D Heron OBE General Secretary Wing Commander C G Jefford MBE BA Membership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol AMRAeS Treasurer Desmond Goch Esq FCAA Members *J S Cox BA MA *Dr M A Fopp MA FMA FIMgt *Group Captain P J Greville RAF Air Commodore H A Probert MBE MA Editor, Publications Derek H Wood Esq AFRAeS Publications Manager Roy Walker Esq ACIB *Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS Malaya, Korea and Kuwait seminar Malaya 5 Korea 59 Kuwait 90 MRAF Lord Tedder by Dr V Orange 145 Book Reviews 161 5 RAF OPERATIONS 1948-1961 MALAYA – KOREA – KUWAIT WELCOMING ADDRESS BY SOCIETY CHAIRMAN Air Vice-Marshal Nigel Baldwin It is a pleasure to welcome all of you today.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Kipion: Royal Navy Assets in the Persian by Claire Mills Gulf
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8628, 6 January 2020 Operation Kipion: Royal Navy assets in the Persian By Claire Mills Gulf 1. Historical presence: the Armilla Patrol The UK has maintained a permanent naval presence in the Gulf region since October 1980, when the Armilla Patrol was established to ensure the safety of British entitled merchant ships operating in the region during the Iran-Iraq conflict. Initially the Royal Navy’s presence was focused solely in the Gulf of Oman. However, as the conflict wore on both nations began attacking each other’s oil facilities and oil tankers bound for their respective ports, in what became known as the “tanker war” (1984-1988). Kuwaiti vessels carrying Iraqi oil were particularly susceptible to Iranian attack and foreign-flagged merchant vessels were often caught in the crossfire.1 In response to a number of incidents involving British registered vessels, in October 1986 the Royal Navy began accompanying British-registered vessels through the Straits of Hormuz and in the Persian Gulf. Later the UK’s Armilla Patrol contributed to the Multinational Interception Force (MIF), a naval contingent patrolling the Persian Gulf to enforce the UN-mandated trade embargo against Iraq, imposed after its invasion of Kuwait in August1990.2 In the aftermath of the 2003 Iraq conflict, Royal Navy vessels, deployed as part of the Armilla Patrol, were heavily committed to providing maritime security in the region, the protection of Iraq’s oil infrastructure and to assisting in the training of Iraqi sailors and marines. 1.1 Assets The Type 42 destroyer HMS Coventry was the first vessel to be deployed as part of the Armilla Patrol, followed by RFA Olwen.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity / Change: Rethinking Options for Trident Replacement
    CONTINUITY / CHANGE: RETHINKING OPTIONS FOR TRIDENT REPLACEMENT DR. NICK RITCHIE Dr. Nick Ritchie Department of Peace Studies BRADFORD DISARMAMENT RESEARCH CENTRE University of Bradford April 2009 DEPARTMENT OF PEACE STUDIES : UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD : JUNE 2010 About this report This report is part of a series of publications under the Bradford Disarmament Research Centre’s programme on Nuclear-Armed Britain: A Critical Examination of Trident Modernisation, Implications and Accountability. To find out more please visit www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/trident.html. Briefing 1: Trident: The Deal Isn’t Done – Serious Questions Remain Unanswered, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing1.html Briefing 2: Trident: What is it For? – Challenging the Relevance of British Nuclear Weapons, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing2.html. Briefing 3: Trident and British Identity: Letting go of British Nuclear Weapons, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing3.html. Briefing 4: A Regime on the Edge? How Replacing Trident Undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing4.html. Briefing 5: Stepping Down the Nuclear Ladder: Options for Trident on a Path to Zero, at www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/briefing5.html. About the author Dr. Nick Ritchie is a Research Fellow at the Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford. He is lead researcher on the Nuclear-Armed Britain programme. He previously worked for six years as a researcher at the Oxford Research Group on global security issues, in particular nuclear proliferation, arms control and disarmament.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Between Hms Relentless & Hms Vigilant
    COLLISION BETWEEN HMS RELENTLESS & HMS VIGILANT Throughout the evening and night of 26th / 27th October 1954, HMS RELENTLESS and HMS VIGILANT, both type 15 frigates, were conducting anti-submarine exercises as they made the transit south through the Minch Channel. The channel is between 20 and 45 miles wide and some 70 miles long and separates the Hebrides from the Scottish mainland. Today, the channel is a busy shipping lane carrying some 2.5 million tonnes of shipping each year. There is no reason to believe the channel was any less busy in 1954 in terms of the number of ships however, the gross tonnage would have been considerably less. At approximately 0415 on the 27th, in response to a signal from RELENTLESS, the VIGILANT was manoeuvring to be astern of RELENTLESS when the ships collided. RELENTLESS rammed VIGILANT on her port side taking out the Wardroom Pantry and a not inconsiderable amount of Wardroom and upper deck fittings. Fortunately, there were no injuries, other than to the pride of a number of people. The damage to the RELENTLESS’ bow section was substantial although both ships managed to make Greenock unaided. Both were dry docked and VIGILANT, once repaired was soon back at sea. RELENTLESS however, despite being made seaworthy, was put into refit in Chatham but in May 1955 was paid off into Category One Reserve. It is unclear from the newspaper reports which follow, how the collision actually happened but the fact that neither ship had navigation lights on may well have been a factor... The Glasgow Herald, Saturday December 4th 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trade Journal Newsletter Editor Been Told by Many That They Now Have the Best Weed Hon
    DS T H E T R A D E 249 JOURNAL 9 Derbyshire Submariners Newsletter Issue Number 249 July 2020 Freedom of the City of Derby to RN Submarine Service Granted 28 April 2002 EDITORIAL BLACK TOT DAY 31 July 2020 - 1970-2020 Black Tot Day (July 31, 1970) is the name given Immediately after the June NL release, the PSU to the last day on which the Royal Navy issued (Power Supply Unit) literally went bang on my 4-year sailors with a daily rum ration (the daily tot). old high spec computer. I contacted the Computer Builders in Bolton to be told the good news was the part was under warranty. but the bad news no supplies due to CV until 11 June, so I thought it would be an appropriate birthday You soothed my nerves and warmed my limbs present; wrong. Basically, on 13 And cheered my dismal heart. Jun they told me they would not Procured my wants, obliged my whims, supply me like for like, as it was not part of the 10- And now it’s time to part. year guarantee on the part, and I would have had to ‘Mid endless perils of the deep re-wire a new one in instead of just plug it in with And miseries untold. existing wires. Thus, I was forced to pay out You summoned sweet forgetful sleep £132.10p for what should have been a warranty Cocooned me from the cold. covered item for supply. Still now up and running, Ten years ago, the ‘pound o’leaf’ and trying to piece all my notes for NL from the last That cast its fragrant smell.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Futures: Western European Options for Nuclear Risk Reduction
    Nuclear futures: Western European options for nuclear risk reduction Martin Butcher, Otfried Nassauer & Stephen Young British American Security Information Council and the Berlin Information-center for Transatlantic Security (BITS), December 1998 Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Executive Summary Chapter One: Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Policy in Western Europe Chapter Two: The United Kingdom Chapter Three: France Chapter Four: Nuclear Co-operation Chapter Five: NATO Europe Chapter Six: Nuclear Risk Reduction in Western Europe Endnotes About the authors Martin Butcher is the Director of the Centre for European Security and Disarmament (CESD), a Brussels-based non-governmental organization. Currently, he is a Visiting Fellow at BASIC’s Washington office. Otfried Nassauer is the Director of the Berlin Information-center for Transatlantic Security (BITS). Stephen Young is a Senior Analyst as BASIC. Previously, he worked for 20/20 Vision and for ACCESS: A Security Information Service. He has a Masters in International Affairs from Columbia University, and a BA from Carleton College. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the many people who pro-vided help of various kinds during the writing of this report. They include: Nicola Butler, for her inestimable assistance; Ambassador James Leonard, for his helpful comments on the report’s recommendations; Professors Paul Rogers and Patricia Chilton, for their comments on early drafts; Daniel Plesch, for his comments on the entire report; and Camille Grand, for his guidance and support in compiling the section on France. Special thanks to Lucy Amis and Tanya Padberg for excellent proofing and copy-editing work, and to Christine Kucia and Kate Joseph for advice and assistance on the layout and design of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gommunigator
    THE GOMMUNIGATOR CRO\MN LIFE INSURANCE CO lncorporated in Canada with Limited Liability (Ministry o{ Defence Accredited Company) * POLICIES IN FORCE EXCEED SIX BILLIONS _ The Royal Navy offers the young man a wonderful, secure and exciting career. Whilst serving in the Navy it is very probable that you will become married, raise a fafu[y glFplan to buy your own home. Crown Life offers the young man security when serving in tl$ s6ivice and also when becoming a civilian. Your Crown Life Underwriter has been trained to a high degree in programming to help you build your future security. Before owning Li{e lnsurance, it is necessary to thoroughly understand the importance attached to it. As a client, your representative will always be available to service your other needs; such as house purchase methods, both normal and the Naval Loan Scheme (applicable to ratings on pensionable engagements), The advantages of Building Society lnvestments, etc. Young men have many questions that need to be answered. Most of these cannot be covered adequately by brochures which give only the basic facts. To be fully conversant will take time. Crown Li{e makes time and therefore by arranging a personal appointment our representative will call on you, without obligation, to discuss your future, which to Crown Life is of paramount i m po rtan ce. To arrange a suitable appointment please write or call:Mr. M. J. Boon, Crown Life Insurance Company,220 Devonshire Avenue, Southsea, Portsmouth, Hants, P04 9EH. Telephone Portsmouth 31031 . Giving the following details:- Name...,...... Add ress Rank or Ratin9..........
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2010 Edition No
    President: Admiral Sir Raymond Lygo KCB Winter 2010 Edition No. 49 - hmsstvincentassoc.org “God bless us, every one” Letter from the President Admiral Sir Raymond Lygo KCB Association Officers President: Admiral Sir Raymond Lygo KCB Vice President: Lt. Alan Dobson RN Rtd Chairman: Ken Cast 01329 668464 Secretary: Vacant and awaiting a volunteer! Membership Secretary: Joe Cornish 01480 414152 Treasurer: Tony Dewhirst 02380 770555 Public Relations: David Coleman 01305 260761 Newsletter Editor: Phil (Darby) Allen MBE 02392 556810 AGM and Reunion Organiser: Vacant and awaiting a volunteer! Standard Bearer: Mick O'Keefe contact via the Chairman Padre: Phillip Hiscock 02392 346881 Slops Manager: Dave Hazlewood 02392 580218 Archivist: John Clifford 01329 282152 Almoners: Henry De Silva – Northern Area 01624 880863 Tony Hoare – Southern Area 01403 267833 Ray Churcher – Western Area 01275 543603 Raffle Organiser: Vacant and awaiting a volunteer! Webmaster: Roger Lyons contact via the Chairman A comprehensive stock of glorious goodies is organised and held by our Slops Manager, Dave Hazlewood, who will be happy to supply a list , to take your order and, of course, your money!. Dave can be contacted at 02392 580218, or [email protected] D.N. Hazlewood, 10 Weymouth Avenue, Gosport, Hampshire. PO12 4NR Nozzer (Elvis?) Reality (Ugh!) Tomorrow? Less hair maybe, but still all my own teeth! My dentist praises Pusser’s fillings, saying that they last a lifetime! I wonder if that is because they red leaded them! Hello my Hearties! Some of you that attended the AGM/Reunion noticed my table and back drop and have responded to my plea for material and as a result I have a few more members‟ articles in this issue, sincere thanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    By Sam185 INTRODUCTION Last Updated 2nd December 2020 ©Sam185 2012-2014 Page 1 ‘R’ Class Destroyer South Atlantic & East Indies 1943-44 Far East Fleet 1944-45 Battle Honours – SABANG 1944, EAST INDIES 1945 Surrender of Singapore 1945 Reserve Fleet 1947-49 ©Sam185 2012-2014 Page 2 HMS RELENTLESS – 1940-1949 A Rotherham-Class (‘R’ Class) destroyer initially ordered as part of the 4th Emergency Flotilla from Fairfield Shipbuilders in Govan in May 1940, HMS RELENTLESS was the second ship to bear the name. Shortly after ordering, work was transferred to John Brown of Clydebank, but construction work was delayed because of higher priority being given to the repair of ships damaged in operations in Norway and from the Dunkirk evacuation. Laid down on 21st June 1941 and launched by Mrs Hatfield - the wife of Dr W H Hatfield, a Director of Thomas Firth – John Brown Ltd of Sheffield - on 15th July 1942, RELENTLESS was completed and commissioned on 30th November, 1942 bearing pennant number H85. RELENTLESS was assigned to the 11th Destroyer Flotilla and after Work Up at Scapa was nominated for Convoy escort duties in the South Atlantic and Indian Ocean throughout 1943. As part of the Eastern Fleet during 1944 and 1945, RELENTLESS was involved in a number of East Indies or Far East fleet operations, notably the bombardment of Sabang and the Surrender of Singapore and eventually left the Far East in October 1945 to return to the UK. RELENTLESS was paid off into Reserve at Chatham on arrival in UK in November 1945 and was laid up in the Chatham Reserve Fleet until 1947 when she was transferred to Harwich.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons in Europe: British and French Deterrence Forces in a European Context Has Come to the Fore in Recent Years
    Questions about the meaning, role and utility of nuclear deterrence forces deterrence and French British in Europe: weapons Nuclear in a European context has come to the fore in recent years. Russia has reemphasized the role of a full-spectrum nuclear arsenal. This includes increased reliance on substrategic nuclear weapons for battlefield use, to compensate for its perceived inferiority in conventional armaments. In Europe, the main multilateral and intergovernmental institutions and cooperation have been put under strain as a result of several negative developments. As a consequence the UK and France, Europe’s two nuclear powers, are debating the role and composition of their respective deterrent forces. Multiple, complex security dilemmas, and the possibility that established alliances and partnerships might not be sufficiently reliable, inform the choices that have to be made. The study concludes that while the current arsenals will remain fundamental to national security, their long term futures are far from certain. Budgetary constraints, domestic politics, and strategic perceptions informed by national nuclear mentalities are the main factors determining the outcome and composition of French and British arsenals beyond 2030. Nuclear weapons in Europe: British and French deterrence forces Niklas Granholm, John Rydqvist FOI-R--4587--SE ISSN1650-1942 www.foi.se April 2018 Niklas Granholm John Rydqvist Nuclear weapons in Europe: British and French deterrence forces Bild/Cover: HMS Victorious returning to Clyde. Photo UK MoD. FOI-R--4587--SE Titel Kärnvapen I Europa: Storbritanniens och Frankrikes kärnvapenarsenaler Title Nuclear weapons in Europe: British and French deterrence forces Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--4587--SE Månad/Month April Utgivningsår/Year 2018 Antal sidor/Pages 79 ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsdepartementet Forskningsområde 8.
    [Show full text]
  • J Class Fleet Destroyer
    J CLASS FLEET DESTROYER FEATURE ARTICLE written by James Davies For KEY INFORMATION Country of Origin: Great Britain. Manufacturers: Hawthorn Leslie, John Brown, Denny, Fairfield, Swan Hunter, White, Yarrow Major Variants: J class, K class, N class, Q class, R class (new), S class (new), T class, U class, V class (new), W class (new), Z class, CA class, CH class, CO class, CR class, Weapon class Role: Fleet protection, reconnaissance, convoy escort Operated by: Royal Navy (Variants also Polish Navy, Royal Australian Navy, Royal Canadian Navy, Royal Netherlands Navy, Royal Norwegian Navy) First Laid Down: 26th August 1937 Last Completed: 12th September 1939 Units: HMS Jervis, HMS Jersey, HMS Jaguar, HMS Juno, HMS Jupiter, HMS Janus, HMS Jackal, HMS Javelin Released by ww2ships.com BRITISH DESTROYERS www.WW2Ships.com FEATURE ARTICLE J Class Fleet Destroyer © James Davies Contents CONTENTS J Class Fleet Destroyer............................................................................................................1 Key Information.......................................................................................................................1 Contents.....................................................................................................................................2 Introduction...............................................................................................................................3 Development.............................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]