DOCSLIB.ORG

Historia-Questoes-E-Debates-662.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historia-Questoes-E-Debates-662.Pdf Reitor Ricardo Marcelo Fonseca Vice-Reitora Graciela Inês Bolzón de Muniz Pró-Reitor de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação Francisco de Assis Mendonça Pró-Reitor de Extensão e Cultura Leandro Franklin Gorsdorf História: Questões & Debates, ano 35, volume 66, n. 2, jul./dez. 2018 Publicação semestral da Associação Paranaense de História (APAH) e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em História da UFPR Editoras Priscila Piazentini Vieira e Renata Senna Garraffoni. Conselho Editorial Marion Brepohl (Presidenta da APAH-Associação Paranaense de História); Ana Paula Vosne Martins, Departamento de História, UFPR; André Macedo Duarte, Departamento de Filosofia, UFPR; Euclides Marchi, Departamento de História, UFPR; Luiz Geraldo Santos da Silva, Departamento de História, UFPR; Márcio B. S. de Oliveira, Departamento de Ciências Sociais, UFPR; Marilene Weinhardt, Departamento de Linguística, Letras Clássicas e Vernáculas, UFPR; Renan Frighetto, Departamento de História, UFPR; Renata Senna Garrafoni, Departamento de História, UFPR; Sergio Odilon Nadalin, Departamento de História, UFPR Conselho Consultivo Angelo Priori (Universidade Estadual de Londrina), Celso Fonseca (Universidade de Brasília), Claudine Haroche (Universidade Sorbonne, França), José Guilherme Cantor Magnani (Universidade Estadual de São Paulo), Marcos Napolitano (Universidade Estadual de São Paulo), Pablo de la Cruz Diaz Martinez (Universidade de Salamanca, Espanha), Pedro Paulo Funari (Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Rodrigo Sá Mota (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais), Ronald Raminelli (Universidade Federal Fluminense), Sidney Munhoz (Universidade Estadual de Maringá), Stefan Rink (Universidade Livre de Berlim), Wolfgang Heuer (Universidade Livre de Berlim, Alemanha) Indexada por Ulrich’s, Latindex, Periódicos CAPES, IBICT, RCAAP, PubMed e Medline (artigos relacionados com a história da saúde) Sistema Eletrônico de Revistas - SER Programa de Apoio à Publicação de Periódicos da UFPR Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação www.prppg.ufpr.br O Sistema Eletrônico de Revistas (SER) é um software livre e permite a submissão de artigos e acesso às revistas de qualquer parte do mundo. Pode ser acessado por autores, consultores, editores, usuários, interessados em acessar e obter cópias de artigos publicados nas revistas. O sistema avisa automaticamente, por e-mail, do lançamento de um novo número da revista aos cadastrados. VOLUME 66 – N. 02 – JULHO A DEZEMBRO DE 2018 Endereço para correspondência História: Questões & Debates Rua General Carneiro, 460 – 6.º andar 80060-150, Curitiba/PR Tel.: +55 (41) 3360 5105 http://revistas.ufpr.br/historia Editoração eletrônica e Capa: Willian Funke Imagem da Capa The view of Patara from the theatre in 2012 Foto de: Eisuke Tanaka Os textos da revista estão licenciados com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional, Podendo ser reproduzidos, citados e distribuídos, desde que com a devida atribuição de autoria e para fins não comerciais. Coordenação de Processos Técnicos de Bibliotecas, UFPR HISTÓRIA: Questões & Debates. Curitiba, PR: Ed. UFPR, — ano 1, n. 1, 1980. Volume 66, n. 2, jul./dez. 2018 ISSN 0100-6932 e-ISSN 2447-8261 1. História – Periódicos Samira Elias Simões CRB-9/755 PUBLICADA NO BRASIL PUBLISHED IN BRAZIL Curitiba, 2018 EDITORIAL Conforme mencionamos no Editorial do número 1 de 2018, seguimos com nosso projeto de internacionalização da História: Questões e Debates. Nesse sentido, é com grande satisfação que apresentamos a segunda parte do dossiê organizado por Allison Bain, colega da Universidade de Laval, Quebec, Canadá. O dossiê tem caráter interdisciplinar e discute História, Memória e Patrimônio em diferentes contextos. Os artigos, como terão a oportunidade de ler, foram escritos por estudiosos da cultura material e patrimônio e em consonância com as preocupações atuais de discutir políticas públicas para uma democratização do acesso ao passado e gestão de patrimônio. São experiências realizadas em diferentes países que participaram, em 2016, do seminário da Association for Critical Heritage Studies (ACHS) que inspiraram um debate sobre História e Memória levando em conta a materialidade do passado. Além do dossiê, na sessão livre de artigos contamos com o artigo de Marion Brephol, da História da UFPR, que reflete sobre a figura do eu- revolucionário, em diversos momentos da obra de Hannah Arendt e, com um segundo artigo, que discute o ensino de História para os Estudantes com Deficiência Intelectual (EDI) no Ensino Fundamental II no Brasil, dos seguintes pesquisadores da área de Educação da UNESP-SP: Anna Augusta Sampaio de Oliveira, Katia de Moura Graça Paixão, Glacielma de Fátima da Silva e Ângelo Ântonio Puzipe Papim, além de uma resenha realizada por Daniel de Souza Lemos (UFPEL) do livro Um olhar sobre o impeachment de Dilma Rousseff, de Rodrigo Almeida. Organizar os números de 2018, com dossiês que contemplam artigos de especialistas de diferentes países, foi uma experiência ímpar e, portanto, um desafio acadêmico diferente para nossa equipe. Com essa iniciativa, a HQD passou a circular em meios internacionais e os levantamentos de acesso feitos por Willian Funke, bolsista, indicam que estamos atingindo um novo patamar de reconhecimento como um periódico de qualidade internacional para a publicação de trabalhos na área de História. Como se trata de um projeto iniciado na gestão anterior, buscaremos manter as metas de melhor indexação para a HQD e, portanto, somos gratas ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em História da UFPR, ao Setor de Periódicos da UFPR, ao Conselho Editorial, à APAH e às/aos pareceristas que têm colaborado para que História: Questões & Debates, Curitiba, volume 66, n.2, p. 5-6, jul./dez. 2018 6 Editorial a HQD siga um caminho inovador no debate de ideias na área de História no Brasil e no exterior. As Editoras. História: Questões & Debates, Curitiba, volume 66, n.2, p. 5-6, jul./dez. 2018 INTRODUCTION Within this issue, readers will find the remaining papers resulting from the session we organized at the 2016 meeting of the Association of Critical Heritage Studies (ACHS), in Montréal, Canada. The first papers of the session were published in early 2018, in volume 66, issue 1, of História: Questões & Debates. While some papers in that issue relate to the practice of archaeology and the management of buried heritage locally, in the Province of Quebec, other papers explore international examples, such as management of heritage in Turkey and the impact of archaeology on the local population in Egypt, a centre for cultural tourism since the 19th century. A methodological case study presents the classification of Chinese large-scale archaeological sites. Several First Nations were present at the meetings, and five of these Nations presented papers or participated in our session. The Waban-Aki Nation contributed to the first set of published papers, presenting its approach to co-managing cultural heritage and natural resources. The present group of papers brings together a variety of topics surrounding how heritage studies can serve the development of identity. Their contents span community archaeology in Newfoundland and Labrador, a 14th-century mythical figure having built castles in southern France, a hermit living on a small island in the St. Lawrence River, the need for an emic perspective in archaeological research into Huron-Wendat heritage, the Cherokee conception of landscape, the memory of enslavement in French Guiana, and public archaeology in Brazil. What do these seven papers have in common? First, they all answer the question “What does heritage change?” The answers stem from a thoughtful and purposeful archaeology that considers visitor interest and the development of knowledge. Second, they all relate to the theme of economics, reminding us of a question asked two years ago by economists concerning heritage. They argued that, rather than asking “What does heritage cost?” to a society that values the study of its past, we should be asking “How much does heritage contribute to societal development?” Through the spirit and meaning it gives to a place, heritage can be a means of creating a sense of belonging. Together, economic benefits and a sense of belonging enhance the quality of life. História: Questões & Debates, Curitiba, volume 66, n.2, p. 7-11, jul./dez. 2018 8 AUGER, R. & BAIN, A. Introduction As we mentioned above, the ACHS meetings are an appropriate venue for bringing together scholars who have chosen to study heritage as a field of critical inquiry. Critical heritage studies challenge conservative views and encourage inclusive, participatory practices while increasing dialogue and debate among researchers, practitioners, and communities. Critical heritage studies also contribute to the decolonization of the humanities through the encouragement and training of communities and through collaborations with indigenous communities (BAIN & AUGER, 2018). In the current issue, the first paper, by Gaulton and Rankin, discusses the use of archaeology as a catalyst for public engagement. The authors eloquently demonstrate how the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador was the first to ask itself “What does heritage change and what can it bring to the province?” rather than “How much does it cost?” Through conscious community engagement – first at the World Heritage Red Bay site and now at the Ferryland site, which has become an important purveyor of employment – archaeology has been making a difference in Newfoundland and Labrador since 1979. The authors’
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cherokee Archaeological Landscapes As Community Action
    CHEROKEE ARCHAEOLOGICAL LANDSCAPES AS COMMUNITY ACTION Paisagens arqueológicas Cherokee como ação comunitária Kathryn Sampeck* Johi D. Griffin Jr.** ABSTRACT An ongoing, partnered program of research and education by the authors and other members of the Tribal Historic Preservation Office of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians contributes to economic development, education, and the creation of identities and communities. Landscape archaeology reveals how Cherokees navigated the pivotal and tumultuous 16th through early 18th centuries, a past muted or silenced in current education programs and history books. From a Cherokee perspective, our starting points are the principles of gadugi, which translates as “town” or “community,” and tohi, which translates as “balance.” Gadugi and tohi together are cornerstones of Cherokee identity. These seemingly abstract principles are archaeologically detectible: gadugi is well addressed by understanding the spatial relationships of the internal organization of the community; the network of relationships among towns and regional resources; artifact and ecofact traces of activities; and large-scale “non-site” features, such as roads and agricultural fields. We focus our research on a poorly understood but pivotal time in history: colonial encounters of the 16th through early 18th centuries. Archaeology plays a critical role in social justice and ethics in cultural landscape management by providing equitable access by * Associate Professor, Illinois State University, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Campus Box 4660, Normal, IL 61701. E-mail: [email protected] ** Historic Sites Keeper, Tribal Historic Preservation Office, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. Qualla Boundary Reservation, P.O. Box 455, Cherokee, NC 28719, USA. História: Questões & Debates, Curitiba, volume 66, n.2, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Savannah River System L STEVENS CR
    The upper reaches of the Bald Eagle river cut through Tallulah Gorge. LAKE TOXAWAY MIDDLE FORK The Seneca and Tugaloo Rivers come together near Hartwell, Georgia CASHIERS SAPPHIRE 0AKLAND TOXAWAY R. to form the Savannah River. From that point, the Savannah flows 300 GRIMSHAWES miles southeasterly to the Atlantic Ocean. The Watershed ROCK BOTTOM A ridge of high ground borders Fly fishermen catch trout on the every river system. This ridge Chattooga and Tallulah Rivers, COLLECTING encloses what is called a EASTATOE CR. SATOLAH tributaries of the Savannah in SYSTEM watershed. Beyond the ridge, LAKE Northeast Georgia. all water flows into another river RABUN BALD SUNSET JOCASSEE JOCASSEE system. Just as water in a bowl flows downward to a common MOUNTAIN CITY destination, all rivers, creeks, KEOWEE RIVER streams, ponds, lakes, wetlands SALEM and other types of water bodies TALLULAH R. CLAYTON PICKENS TAMASSEE in a watershed drain into the MOUNTAIN REST WOLF CR. river system. A watershed creates LAKE BURTON TIGER STEKOA CR. a natural community where CHATTOOGA RIVER ARIAIL every living thing has something WHETSTONE TRANSPORTING WILEY EASLEY SYSTEM in common – the source and SEED LAKEMONT SIX MILE LAKE GOLDEN CR. final disposition of their water. LAKE RABUN LONG CREEK LIBERTY CATEECHEE TALLULAH CHAUGA R. WALHALLA LAKE Tributary Network FALLS KEOWEE NORRIS One of the most surprising characteristics TUGALOO WEST UNION SIXMILE CR. DISPERSING LAKE of a river system is the intricate tributary SYSTEM COURTENAY NEWRY CENTRALEIGHTEENMILE CR. network that makes up the collecting YONAH TWELVEMILE CR. system. This detail does not show the TURNERVILLE LAKE RICHLAND UTICA A River System entire network, only a tiny portion of it.
    [Show full text]
  • To Jocassee Gorges Trust Fund
    Jocassee Journal Information and News about the Jocassee Gorges Summer/Fall, 2000 Volume 1, Number 2 Developer donates $100,000 to Jocassee Gorges Trust Fund Upstate South Carolina developer Jim Anthony - whose things at Jocassee with the interest from development Cliffs at Keowee Vineyards is adjacent to the Jocassee the Trust Fund. Gorges - recently donated $100,000 to the Jocassee Gorges Trust “We are excited about Cliffs Fund. Communities becoming a partner with the “The job that the conservation community has done at Jocassee DNR on the Jocassee project,” Frampton Gorges has really inspired me,” said Anthony, president of Cliffs said. “Although there is a substantial Communities. “It’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to be here at amount of acreage protected in the the right time and to be able to help like this. We’re delighted to Jocassee Gorges, some development play a small part in maintaining the Jocassee Gorges tract.” around it is going to occur. The citizens John Frampton, assistant director for development and national in this state are fortunate to have a affairs with the S.C. Department of Natural Resources, said developer like Jim Anthony whose Anthony’s donation will “jump-start the Trust Fund. This will be a conservation ethic is reflected in his living gift, because we will eventually be able to do many good properties. In the Cliffs Communities’ developments, a lot of the green space and key wildlife portions are preserved and enhanced. Jim Anthony has long been known as a conservationist, and this generous donation further illustrates his commitment to conservation and protection of these unique mountain habitats.” Approved in 1997 by the S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Jocassee Journal Information and News About the Jocassee Gorges
    Jocassee Journal Information and News about the Jocassee Gorges www.dnr.sc.gov Fall/Winter 2020 Volume 21, Number 2 Wildflower sites in Jocassee Gorges were made possible by special funding from Duke Energy’s Habitat Enhancement Program. (SCDNR photo by Greg Lucas) Duke Energy funds colorful Jocassee pollinator plants Insects and hummingbirds South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) Jocassee Gorges Project Manager Mark Hall flocked to wildflower sites approached the HEP committee in 2019 with a proposal Several places within the Jocassee Gorges received a to establish wildflower patches throughout Jocassee Gorges colorful “facelift” in 2020, thanks to special funding through to benefit “pollinator species.” Pollinator species include Duke Energy’s Habitat Enhancement Program (HEP). bats, hummingbirds, bees, butterflies and As part of the Keowee-Toxaway relicensing other invertebrates that visit wildflowers and agreement related to Lakes Jocassee and Keowee, subsequently distribute pollen among a wide Duke Energy collects fees associated with docks range of fruit-bearing and seed-bearing plants. and distributes the monies each year for projects The fruits and seeds produced are eventually consumed within the respective watersheds to promote wildlife habitat by a host of game and non-game animals. Pollinator species improvements. Continued on page 2 Mark Hall, Jocassee Gorges Project land manager, admires some of the pollinator species that were planted in Jocassee Gorges earlier this year. (SCDNR photo by Cindy Thompson) Jocassee wildflower sites buzzing with life Continued from page 1 play a key role in the complex, ecological chain that is the is a very important endeavor. Several additional miles of foundation for diverse vegetation within Jocassee Gorges.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Recalling Cahokia: Indigenous influences on English commercial expansion and imperial ascendancy in proprietary South Carolina, 1663-1721 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wall, William Kevin Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 06:16:12 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298767 RECALLING CAHOKIA: INDIGENOUS INFLUENCES ON ENGLISH COMMERCIAL EXPANSION AND IMPERIAL ASCENDANCY IN PROPRIETARY SOUTH CAROLINA, 1663-1721. by William kevin wall A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the AMERICAN INDIAN STUDIES PROGRAM In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2005 UMI Number: 3205471 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform 3205471 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial History of the Cherokee Nation from 1721 to 1835
    This dissertation has been 64—13,325 microfilmed exactly as received DICKSON, John L ois, 1918- THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835. The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D., 1964 History, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY JOHN LOIS DICKSON Norman, Oklahoma 1964 THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835 APPROVED BY A M ^ rIfaA:. IÀ j ^CV ' “ DISSERTATION (XMHTTEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Grateful acknowledgement is extended to the follow­ ing persons vdio have helped me both directly and indirectly: Miss Gabrille W. Jones and Mrs. H. H. Keene of the Thomas Gilcrease Institute of American History and Art, Ttilsa, Okla­ homa; Miss Sue Thorton and Mrs. Reba Cox of Northeastern State College, Tahlequah, Oklahoma; Miss Louise Cook, Mrs. Dorothy Williams, Mrs. Relia Looney, and Mrs. Mar on B. At­ kins of the Oklahoma Historical Society; and to Mrs. Alice Timmons of the Phillips Collection as well as the entire staff of the University of Oklahoma Library. Particularly, I would like to thank Mr. Raymond Pillar of Southeastern State College Library for his help in making materials avail­ able to me. I also wish to thank all members of my doctoral com­ mittee at the University of Oklahoma and also President Allen £• Shearer, Dr. James Morrison, and Dr. Don Brown of South­ eastern State College.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 ______
    Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 _____________________ CONTENTS Agriculture and Land Use ................................................................................................................3 Appalachian Studies.........................................................................................................................8 Archaeology and Physical Anthropology ......................................................................................14 Architecture, Historic Buildings, Historic Sites ............................................................................18 Arts and Crafts ..............................................................................................................................21 Biography .......................................................................................................................................27 Civil War, Military.........................................................................................................................29 Coal, Industry, Labor, Railroads, Transportation ..........................................................................37 Description and Travel, Recreation and Sports .............................................................................63 Economic Conditions, Economic Development, Economic Policy, Poverty ................................71 Education .......................................................................................................................................82
    [Show full text]
  • 03060101-03 (Little River/Lake Keowee)
    03060101-03 (Little River/Lake Keowee) General Description Watershed 03060101-03 (formerly 03060101-050) is located in Oconee County and consists primarily of the Little River and its tributaries as it flow through Lake Keowee. The watershed occupies 104,996 acres of the Blue Ridge and Piedmont regions of South Carolina. Land use/land cover in the watershed includes: 65.4% forested land, 17.2% agricultural land, 7.5% urban land, 9.2% water, 0.3% barren land, 0.2% forested wetland (swamp), and 0.2% nonforested wetland (marsh). A map depicting this watershed is found in Appendix A, page A-34. Burgess Creek (Long Branch) and Mill Creek join to form the North Fork Little River, which accepts drainage from Craven Creek, Whitewater Lake, Smeltzer Creek, Fiddlers Creek, Barbeque Branch, and the Flat Shoals River. The Flat Shoals River is formed from the confluence of Cheohee Creek and Tamassee Creek (Horse Bone Branch). Cheohee Creek accepts drainage from White Rock Creek (Bee Cave Creek, Wilson Creek, Pack Branch), Townes Creek, and Mud Creek. Townes Creek is formed by the confluence of Crane Creek and West Fork and accepts drainage from Wash Branch and Crossland Creek before flowing through Lake Isaqueena (also known as Lake Cherokee). Moody Creek (Cantrell Creek, Cheohee Lake, White Oak Creek) and Jumping Branch also drain into Townes Creek through the lake. Flat Shoals River then accepts drainage from Reece Branch and Davey Branch before merging with the North Fork Little River to form the Little River. Downstream of the confluence, the Little River accepts drainage from Oconee Creek (Alexander Creek, Station Creek), Yarborough Branch, Camp Bottom Branch, and Todd Branch before the river begins to impound into Lake Keowee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mcclelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region
    Minnesota State University, Mankato Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato All Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects Capstone Projects 2018 The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region Jasmine Koncur Minnesota State University, Mankato Follow this and additional works at: https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Koncur, J. (2018). The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region [Master’s thesis, Minnesota State University, Mankato]. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/802/ This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects at Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region By Jasmine Charline Koncur A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science In Applied Anthropology Minnesota State University, Mankato Mankato, Minnesota April 2018 April, 2018 Format of Original Signature Page (No page number The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region Jasmine C.
    [Show full text]
  • Environ Quality Features of Duke Power Co's Keowee Toxaway Project
    . .. .. ... .- . _ . _ , . - . .. - . _ _ . ..--.- .--- . - . _ .-- - - ., . .. _a, p " ' fc A(/ , m.~.. g.< . -2 (? i Re- * '--- Tre Ov, ,. 7 * 4.,. , j f .:.. :2 = ; e- g. .::, -s c . !c } . : 1 ! l 4- 1 i rr ,1 i i ! i 2NVIRONMENTAL QUALITY FEATURES : OF ' DUKE POWER COMPANY'S KE0 WEE-T0XAWAY PROJECT i i , k a ! , f i 5 .! W- '? ' ., 1 : ! . July 1970 - .[ . : I - - 3 V |+ '' ' - i 800114D D n - - .- . _ - . , ~ . _ . _ - . _ _ , , _ _ . _ _ _ _ .. _ _ . , . - , . _ . , _ - . _ ., - -- . e- INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the environmental quality features of Duke Power's Keowee-Toxsway Project located in northwestern South Carolina and western North Carolina. From its conception and throughout its planning ano execution, the project with its many interrelated elements has been considered as an Integrated development with the objective of providing reliable, low-cost electric generation and of enhancing its beneficial eff ects upon the environment. A number of project elements are under the regulatory jurisdictions of a variety of governmental agencies. Licenses, permits, contracts, agreements or under- standings have been sought from 61 entities of government. Throughout these proceedings, Duke Power has coordinated the many interrelated project elements so that the integrated result will maximize project objectives. PROJECT DESCRIPTION As ultimately planned, the project will include two major iakes, several smaller reservoirs to high mountain saddles, and electric generating capacity of about 10 million kilowatts. Long-range planning includes a variety of developments utilizing these water resources along with 150,000 acres of surrounding land. The project lies at the meeting of the Piedmont hills and the Southern Blue Ridge Mountains in Oconee and Pickens County, South Carolina and Transyl- vania County, North Carolina, and along the Keowee River and its tributaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Geography of a Massacre: Cherokee and Carolinian Visions of Land at Long Cane
    Geography of a Massacre: Cherokee and Carolinian Visions of Land at Long Cane Jessica Leann Cook Los Angeles, California. Bachelor of Arts in History, University of California, 2009 A thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of Virginia May, 2017 1 Geography of a Massacre: Cherokee and Carolinian Visions of Land at Long Cane Jessica L. Cook Note: Maps for this essay are available online at http://www.viseyes.org/mapscholar/?1635. On February 1, 1760, after eighteen months of rising tensions between Cherokee peoples and British colonists, a contingent of Cherokee warriors attacked a convoy of fleeing British settlers near Long Cane Creek in northwestern South Carolina. Later named "The Long Canes Massacre” by Anglo-Americans, the deadly ambush made front page news throughout the colony and precipitated two devastating British military campaigns into Cherokee homelands. Over the last eighty years, scholars have considered the attack at Long Cane Creek only as a narrative event and have used it to illustrate rising tensions in their broader studies of the region's history. As a result, academic understanding of Long Canes' significance has changed very little since the nineteenth century. Current scholarship argues that area border disputes and the massacre occurred because of “illegal” settlement beyond a boundary line negotiated in 1747. This interpretation, however, assumes that the 1747 boundary was legitimate, that British officials, settlers, and the Cherokee knew and agreed on its precise location, and that average Cherokee people understood the treaty's terms enough to recognize and become angered by boundary violations.1 1 In his detailed geographical study of the Southern Indian Boundary formation, Louis DeVorsey used the term ‘illegal’ to summarize the contents of an August 1758 Cherokee letter to the governor of Georgia requesting help removing white settlers from area hunting grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • A Memoir of the Archaeological Excavation of Fort Prince George, Pickens County, South Carolina Along with Pertinent Historical Documentation Marshall W
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Research Manuscript Series Institute of 1998 A Memoir of the Archaeological Excavation of Fort Prince George, Pickens County, South Carolina Along with Pertinent Historical Documentation Marshall W. Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Marshall W., "A Memoir of the Archaeological Excavation of Fort Prince George, Pickens County, South Carolina Along with Pertinent Historical Documentation" (1998). Research Manuscript Series. 202. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/202 This Book is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Manuscript Series by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Memoir of the Archaeological Excavation of Fort Prince George, Pickens County, South Carolina Along with Pertinent Historical Documentation Keywords Excavations, Duke Power Company, Fort Prince George, Pickens County, South Carolina, Archeology Disciplines Anthropology Publisher The outhS Carolina Institute of Archeology and Anthropology--University of South Carolina Comments In USC online Library catalog at: http://www.sc.edu/library/ This book is available at Scholar Commons: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/archanth_books/202 A Memoir of the Archaeological Excavation of
    [Show full text]