DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mcclelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Mcclelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region Minnesota State University, Mankato Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato All Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects Capstone Projects 2018 The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region Jasmine Koncur Minnesota State University, Mankato Follow this and additional works at: https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Koncur, J. (2018). The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region [Master’s thesis, Minnesota State University, Mankato]. Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/802/ This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects at Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Other Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region By Jasmine Charline Koncur A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science In Applied Anthropology Minnesota State University, Mankato Mankato, Minnesota April 2018 April, 2018 Format of Original Signature Page (No page number The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region Jasmine C. Koncur This thesis has been examined and approved by the following members of the student’s committee. ________________________________ Dr. Ronald C. Schirmer (Advisor) ________________________________ Dr. Edward P. Fleming (Committee Member) ________________________________ Dr. Kathleen T. Blue (Committee Member) 2 ABSTRACT The McClelland Site (21GD258) and the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region Jasmine Charline Koncur Master Science in Applied Anthropology Minnesota State University, Mankato Mankato, Minnesota, 2018 There is a long history of Oneota studies in the Red Wing, Minnesota, region, but most have been closely intertwined with the Silvernale phase, either because of site location or actual cultural linking. This has created a literature rife with speculation about the relationship between Silvernale and Oneota. While there are some Oneota sites known to exist near sites with Silvernale phase materials, there are many others away from Silvernale sites that have not yet received detailed analysis. The McClelland site (21GD258) is one of many single component Oneota sites in tributary valleys outside the Mississippi trench. The McClelland assemblage can be used to help construct the framework for a better understanding of the Oneota tradition within the Red Wing region separate from the Silvernale phase. This analysis will help develop a more comprehensive understanding of the unique characteristics of Oneota tradition in the Red Wing Region. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Back in 2010 on my first archeology field school, I had the pleasure of breaking ground at the McClelland site. The overly excited undergraduate (shell!) I was decided the material we recovered was what I wanted to work on for my Master’s Thesis. The research for this thesis was enjoyable. Looking back at all the hard work, which I know I might have grumbled about a time or two, it is enjoyable to see the end result. The journey through my graduate courses and thesis have been influenced by several individuals and my family. I hope to express my appreciation and gratitude to everyone, and if I miss one it was not intentional. To my husband Joe, thank you for the support and encouragement throughout this process. I know between commuting, military separations, classes, teaching and digs you made sure the front lines back home did not crumble. To my children Charlie and Emma, thank you for smiles, hugs, and love, I love you two more than you will ever know. To my adviser, Dr. Ronald Schirmer, thank you for your time, patience, teaching, lectures and being a mentor. Back in 2008 when I enrolled into Ethnobotany, the enthusiasm you had about plants and culture caught me. Never in my life did I ever consider going on for a higher degree beyond a bachelors degree. But, here I am, loving paleoethnobotany and enjoying every conversation we have about it. I would like to also thank my other committee members Dr. Ed Fleming and Dr. Kathleen Blue. Thank you, Ed, for always listening and having conversations with me about archeology, even at times when I was not clear enough in my thoughts. Your mentorship, thoughts, ethics and methods not only have helped form my thesis but myself 4 as an archeologist. Thank you, Kate, for your time with teaching and helping me understand the broader aspects of anthropology and answering any questions I had about fauna. Your knowledge has sparked many more areas of interest that one day I hope to expand on. To the Anthropology department at Minnesota State University, Mankato, thank you for teaching me the four-field approach and supporting me through my time as a non- traditional graduate student. To the Geography department at Minnesota State University, Mankato, especially to Dr. Ginger Schmid, Dr. Forrest Wilkerson, Dr. Fei Yuan, and Dr. Don Friend, thank you for having an interest in my work and helping me incorporate geography into my research and pushing me to broaden my horizons. Thank you to my parents Tim and Amy for the support from a young age to learn about science and to never stop pushing myself. At times when I questioned myself, you stood behind me and kept me moving forward. To my brothers Ian and Sam, thank you for the support, interest and enthusiasm for my work, even though at times it might be a bonfire mood killer. To my in-laws, Al, I wish you were here still, thank you for all the support you gave me when I went back to school after I had Charlie. Nancy, thank you for being supportive and helping with the kids when Joe was gone, without your help I would have struggled more. To my grandparents, Betty and Lindy, and Gerry and Sue, thank you for encouraging me as a child and adult to achieve my education. I would like to also thank my co-workers at the Science Museum of Minnesota for the support. And last but not least the several other undergraduates and graduate students that helped me. Jackie Skinner, our commutes to and from school were times I loved, we 5 had such interesting conversations working out our thoughts on our work. Also, thank you for spending countless hours helping me float all the soil samples from the features. Being my partner through the dark hours of the night working on our research, I would have never been able to do it without you. Thanks to Emily Evenson for taking the pictures of all the diagnostic artifacts from the 2010 collections, and also teaching me how to sketch pottery. Thanks, too, to Travis Hager, for teaching me the basics of paleoethnobotany when I was an undergraduate. Your enthusiasm and passion still vibrate in my mind. Josh Anderson (1.0), was my sound board, my dig partner, helped me with lithics and was there to help me process the heavy fraction at the end of my data collection. Jason Reichel helped with any and every lithic question I ever had. Other students who in one way or another helped me along my thesis work include Cory Nowak, Michelle Neumann, Andy Brown, Ty Warmka, Duncan Widman, Josh Anderson (2.0), Mike Bergervoet, Jared Langseth, and Kyle Harvey. 6 To My Children Charlie and Emma “You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any direction you choose.” Dr. Seuss “Oh, The Places You’ll Go!” 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 8 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ 10 LIST TABLES ................................................................................................................. 11 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 12 CHAPTER TWO: BACKGROUND............................................................................ 16 Taxonomic History of the Oneota Tradition in the Red Wing Region ......................... 17 Historic Investigations in the Spring Creek and Hay Creek Valleys ............................ 23 CHAPTER THREE: METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS .. 31 Field Methods ............................................................................................................... 31 Lab Methods ................................................................................................................. 33 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND ANALYSIS ....................................................... 37 Unit Descriptions .......................................................................................................... 38 Block A ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Noxious and Rangeland Weed Management: Getting the Most out of Spraying Mark Pederson Dow Agrosciences [email protected]
    Noxious and Rangeland Weed Management: Getting the Most Out of Spraying Mark Pederson Dow AgroSciences [email protected] DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Thanks to Pend Oreille County. DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Successful Herbicide Weed Control • Why does the herbicide work better one year and not the next? • What changes from year to year? • Is your equipment in good working order? • Just keeping on doing what you always have done… • And get what you always got! DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only The Variables • Weather • Growing conditions • Temperatures • Wind • Water volume per acre applied • Equipment wear and calibration • You, you, you DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Start with the End in Mind • Visualize what you want to accomplish with every spray job – set expectations • Review records and see what has changed • Are the growing conditions and weeds conducive to weed control? • Recalibrate every year and even do a check up during the spray season • Calibrate every applicator that applies products DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Rates, Carrier & Equipment • Select herbicide product that: – controls the majority of target weeds – use the correct rates (don’t scrimp) • Water carrier per acre – use enough to get the product to the desired site of activity (if herbicide is soil active, it must penetrate the vegetative canopy to get benefit) – Use Syltac or R-11 • Tune-up sprayers and do timely repairs DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Adjuvants/Surfactants • Always use Syltac or R-11 • Use
    [Show full text]
  • Crops Before Corn an INVESTIGATION of EASTERN AGRICULTURAL COMPLEX PLANTS at the TOM JONES SITE, ARKANSAS
    Crops Before Corn AN INVESTIGATION OF EASTERN AGRICULTURAL COMPLEX PLANTS AT THE TOM JONES SITE, ARKANSAS ROSIE BLEWITT-GOLSCH Corn, Beans, and Squash Eastern Agricultural Complex • Initial domestication ca. 4000 – 3000 BP • Earliest occurrences found in upper South and lower Midwest • Initial evidence of EAC from rock shelters, but difficult to prove that they were actually grown as crops in prehistory Wild-Cultivated-Domesticated Spectrum Activities Outcomes • No intervention • Cultivation - preparing a seed bed, garden, field, • Encourage/tend planting the seeds Clearing out competing however, identical trees to wild plants Bringing water to plants • Domestication - putting during drought different selective Pruning plants pressures on plants and animals; generally genetic Burning and/or phenotypic • Control reproduction plants dependent Transplanting on people Collecting and planting seeds Eastern Agricultural Complex Plant Species • Sumpweed (Iva annua) • Sunflower (Helianthus annus) • Maygrass (Phalaris caroliniana) • Goosefoot (Chenopodium berlandieri) • Knotweed (Polygonum erectum) • Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum) • Squash (Cucurbita pepo) Squash and Gourds • Bottle gourd (date?) • Squash (4400 BP) • Produce starchy seeds but not much flesh • Rinds can be used as floats or containers • Domestication marked by seed enlargement and increase in rind thickness Squash Bottle Gourd Sunflower and Sumpweed • Sunflower (4300 BP) • Sumpweed (3900 BP) • Oily seeds • Domestication marked by increase in seed size Sunflower Sumpweed Goosefoot and Erect Knotweed • Goosefoot (3500 BP) • Erect knotweed (2500 BP) • Starchy seeds, Fall food source • Seed coat thickness, larger perisperm Knotweed Goosefoot Goosefoot Wild goosefoot Domesticated goosefoot Domesticated? variant Wild? variant Erect knotweed – two phenotypes Longer/shorter Thick/thin seed coat Maygrass and Little Barley • Maygrass (date?) • Little barley (date?) • Starchy seeds, Spring resources • Geographic range, quantity little barley Maygrass WHEAT Middle East Domesticated ~7,000 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Illinois Archaeology
    Discover Illinois Archaeology ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Discover Illinois Archaeology Illinois’ rich cultural heritage began more collaborative effort by 18 archaeologists from than 12,000 years ago with the arrival of the across the state, with a major contribution by ancestors of today’s Native Americans. We learn Design Editor Kelvin Sampson. Along with sum- about them through investigations of the remains maries of each cultural period and highlights of they left behind, which range from monumental regional archaeological research, we include a earthworks with large river-valley settlements to short list of internet and print resources. A more a fragment of an ancient stone tool. After the extensive reading list can be found at the Illinois arrival of European explorers in the late 1600s, a Association for Advancement of Archaeology succession of diverse settlers added to our cul- web site www.museum.state.il.us/iaaa/DIA.pdf. tural heritage, leading to our modern urban com- We hope that by reading this summary of munities and the landscape we see today. Ar- Illinois archaeology, visiting a nearby archaeo- chaeological studies allow us to reconstruct past logical site or museum exhibit, and participating environments and ways of life, study the rela- in Illinois Archaeology Awareness Month pro- tionship between people of various cultures, and grams each September, you will become actively investigate how and why cultures rise and fall. engaged in Illinois’ diverse past and DISCOVER DISCOVER ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGY, ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGY. summarizing Illinois culture history, is truly a Alice Berkson Michael D. Wiant IIILLINOIS AAASSOCIATION FOR CONTENTS AAADVANCEMENT OF INTRODUCTION.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Oneota and Langford Traditions
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ONEOTA AND LANGFORD TRADITIONS by Chrisie L. Hunter A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2002 A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ONEOTA AND LANGFORD TRADITIONS by Chrisie L. Hunter A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2002 ________________________________________________________________________ Major Professor Date ________________________________________________________________________ Graduate School Approval Date ii ABSTRACT A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ONEOTA AND LANGFORD TRADITIONS by Chrisie L. Hunter The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2002 Under the Supervision of Dr. Robert J. Jeske This study is a comparative analysis of two contemporaneous sites from two related cultural systems, Oneota and Langford. Similarities and differences between the sites were examined through analysis of technology, faunal and floral remains, and environmental variables. A catchment analysis was completed to understand environmental factors affecting agricultural practices and resource utilization between the two sites. The issue of agricultural production and the extent this subsistence strategy was utilized at two sites was examined. The Crescent Bay Hunt Club site (Oneota) and Washington Irving site (Langford) are shown to be similar in lithic technology but significantly different in ceramic technology, and subsistence strategies. The Oneota Crescent Bay Hunt Club site occupants were more dependant upon wetland resources than were the Langford occupants of the Washington Irving site. _______________________________________________________________________ Major Professor Date iii © Copyright by Chrisie L. Hunter, 2002 All Rights Reserved iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 ______
    Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 _____________________ CONTENTS Agriculture and Land Use ................................................................................................................3 Appalachian Studies.........................................................................................................................8 Archaeology and Physical Anthropology ......................................................................................14 Architecture, Historic Buildings, Historic Sites ............................................................................18 Arts and Crafts ..............................................................................................................................21 Biography .......................................................................................................................................27 Civil War, Military.........................................................................................................................29 Coal, Industry, Labor, Railroads, Transportation ..........................................................................37 Description and Travel, Recreation and Sports .............................................................................63 Economic Conditions, Economic Development, Economic Policy, Poverty ................................71 Education .......................................................................................................................................82
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Potential of Chenopodwm Berlandieri in Prehistoric Eastern North America
    J. Ethnobiol. 7(1):29-54 Summer 1987 THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF CHENOPODWM BERLANDIERI IN PREHISTORIC EASTERN NORTH AMERICA BRUCE D. SMITH Department of Anthropology National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20560 ABSTRACT.-A thin-testa domesticate chenopod (Chenopodium berlandieri ssp. jonesi­ anum) was present in the eastern woodlands of North America by approximately 3500 BP., and this cultigen subsequently became one of the more important components of pre-maize plant husbandry systems in the East. The economic potential of this prehistoric domesticate can be projected through harvest studies of present day wild/weedy stands of Chenopodium berlandieri. During the fall of 1984 and 1985 a total of 86 plants located in nine states were harvested, with timed harvest hand stripping experiments carried out on 16stands. Harvest yield values varied from 276 kglha to 2854 kglha. Harvest rate values ranging from .41 kg/hr to 1.6 kglhr were recorded. Relatively conservative harvest yield and harvest rate values of 750-1500 kg/ha and 0.7 - 1.1 kg/hr are proposed for C. ber­ landieri in the prehistoric eastern woodlands, and when a seed coat thickness correction factor is applied, the resultant relatively conservative harvest yield range estimate of 500 - 100 kg/ha is found to favorably compare to quinoa and maize, as well as other eastern pre-maize cultigens. INTRODUCTION RESEARCH DESIGN The tropical cultigen triad of com} beans} and squash often is considered the core of prehistoric plant husbandry in Eastern North America} and these three crops were certainly of substantial economic importance during the late prehistoric period.
    [Show full text]
  • Pit Features: a View from Grand Island, Michigan
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 4-26-2018 Pit Features: A View From Grand Island, Michigan Emily R. Bartz Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bartz, Emily R., "Pit Features: A View From Grand Island, Michigan" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 980. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/980 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PIT FEATURES: A VIEW FROM GRAND ISLAND, MICHIGAN EMILY R. BARTZ 161 Pages Serving a multitude of functions from subterrestrial cavities of storage, basins for cooking, to vessels that securely hold pounds of rice allowing the grains to be danced upon to thresh, pit features are one of North Americas most common archaeological feature. These constructions are dug to fit a diversity of needs based on the people who manufacture them. By understanding the distinct function(s) a pit or group of pit features played at a site-level, the needs of the people who inhabited that landscape are better understood. The nature of a pit feature is to store or process something that is of value, by virtue of the objects pits once contained, those materials are predominantly reclaimed from the pit when it was in use.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Variation in the Seed Morphology of Iva Annua Var
    Research Communications Patterns of Variation in the Seed Morphology of Iva annua var. macrocarpa, an Extinct North American Domesticate Andrew W. Weiland1* and Kristen J. Gremillion1 1Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA *[email protected] Abstract Using measurements from archaeological achenes of the extinct North American cultigen marshelder (Iva annua var. macrocarpa [S.F. Blake] R.C. Jackson), we quantitatively explore patterns of variation of fruit length and width across mid-continental North America. Linear regression shows that while achene length and width increase significantly over time (length: p-value<0.0001, b=-126.04, r2=0.1037, width: p-value<0.0001, b=-230.85, r2=0.0964), overall, regions tend to show more variation. A high incidence of phenotypic variation among domesticated marshelder as measured by coefficient of variation may be a result of introgression with wild stands. An ANOVA Tukey post-hoc analysis of archaeological site samples resulted in homogeneous subsets which correspond to region with some overlap, interpreted as a cline. These results and the low numbers of wild-sized achenes in archaeological marshelder samples of eastern Kentucky support human introduction of domesticated marshelder into this region. Marshelder in the archaeological record reflects the long- standing mixed economies of hunting-gathering and agriculture used by indigenous communities of eastern North America. Received May 26, 2017 OPEN ACCESS Accepted December 12, 2017 DOI 10.14237/ebl.9.2.2018.990 Keywords Paleoethnobotany, Seed morphology, Archaeology, Native North America, Domestication Copyright © 2018 by the author(s); licensee Society of Ethnobiology. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Native Plant Record, Volume 12, Number 1, December
    ISSN 1536‐7738 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society Volume 12, December 2012 1 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society 2435 South Peoria Tulsa, Oklahoma 74114 Volume 12, December 2012 ISSN 1536-7738 http://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/ Managing Editor: Sheila Strawn Production Editor: Paula Shryock Electronic Production Editor: Sandy Graue Technical Advisor: Bruce Hoagland The purpose of ONPS is to encourage the study, protection, propagation, appreciation and use of the native plants of Oklahoma. Membership in ONPS is open to any person who supports the aims of the Society. ONPS offers individual, student, family, and life memberships. 2012 Officers and Board Members President: Adam Ryburn Mycology Chapter Chair: Steve Marek Vice-President: Lynn Michael Northeast Chapter Chair: Alicia Nelson Secretary: Sandy Graue Color Oklahoma Chair: Pearl Garrison Treasurer: Mary Korthase Conservation Chair: Chadwick Cox Membership Coordinator: Tina Julich Gaillardia Editor: Chadwick Cox Historian: Jeanie Coley Website Manager: Adam Ryburn Past President: Lynn Michael http://www.oknativeplants.org Board Members: Harriet Barclay Award Chair: Brooke Bonner Rahmona Thompson Elaine Lynch Anne Long Award Chair: Gloria Caddell Buddy Miller ONPS Service Award Chair: Sue Amstutz Clare Miller Photography Contest Chair: Kim Shannon Janette Steets Librarian: Karen Haworth Jay Walker Mailings Chair: Karen Haworth Central Chapter Chair: Joe Roberts Publicity Chair: Alicia Nelson Cross-Timbers
    [Show full text]
  • State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List
    4/2/14 & n s p State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., M. Butterw ick, N.C. Melvin, and W.N. Kirchner. 2014. The National Wetland Plant List: 2014 Update of Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2014-41: 1-42. http://wetland_plants.usace.army.mil/ Sisyrinchium demissum Greene (Stif f Blue-Ey ed-Grass) Photo: Lewis E. Epple User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for w etland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or w etter in at least one Corps region. 3) Some state boundaries lie w ithin tw o or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating w ill be show n in one column and the other column w ill be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/24 4/2/14 State of NEW MEXICO 2014 Wetland Plant List Total Species = 1506 AW GP WMVC OBL 273 266 266 FACW 337 330 320 FAC 338 329 345 FACU 450 390 430 UPL 100 126 116 Regional Totals 1498 1441 1477 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velv etleaf Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Cany on Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silv er Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achnatherum hymenoides (Roemer & J.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Schwerdt Site (20 AE 127) Ceramics: a Berrien Phase Ceramic Assemblage in Allegan County, Michigan
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1980 The Schwerdt Site (20 AE 127) Ceramics: A Berrien Phase Ceramic Assemblage in Allegan County, Michigan Paul W. McAllister Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation McAllister, Paul W., "The Schwerdt Site (20 AE 127) Ceramics: A Berrien Phase Ceramic Assemblage in Allegan County, Michigan" (1980). Master's Theses. 1886. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1886 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SCHWERDT SITE (20 AE 127) CERAMICS: A BERRIEN PHASE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE IN ALLEGAN COUNTY, MICHIGAN by Paul W. McAllister A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillm ent of the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who assisted me, both directly and indirectly, throughout this endeavor, and I thank them a ll. Special thanks must go to my major advisor, Dr. William M. Crernin, who provided constant stimulation and encouragement through­ out my stay at Western Michigan University. I gratefully thank Nedenia Kennedy and Dr. Elizabeth Garland for serving on my thesis committee. Their c ritic a l advice on the ceramic descriptions is especially appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleming Umn 0130E 10470.Pdf (7.855Mb Application/Pdf)
    Community and Aggregation in the Upper Mississippi River Valley: The Red Wing Locality A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Edward Paul Fleming IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Guy E. Gibbon, Advisor June, 2009 © Edward Paul Fleming 2009 Acknowledgements I am indebted to many people who have helped me with this research over the past several years. This has been an intellectual journey and a major period of growth in my life. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Guy Gibbon, who encouraged me to join the PhD program in anthropology at the University of Minnesota and was invaluable in shaping my research and guiding me through the program in a timely manner. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee, Dr. Peter Wells, Dr. Gil Tostevin, and Dr. Rod Squires. I owe much of my thinking about material culture theory to a seminar on the subject to Dr. Tostevin and an excellent seminar he taught on the subject. That was perhaps the most influential course I have taken. I have benefited from the guidance of several mentors over the years. I thank especially my friends and colleagues, Dr. Ron Schirmer and Dr. George Holley. I could not have completed this without their help and encouragement. Much of this research is the product of many, many long conversations, and many, many occasions where I needed to be gently brought back to ground and to the realities of the data and anthropological theory.
    [Show full text]