DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Flint, Southern Roots: a Diachronic Analysis of Paleoethnobotanical Remains and Maize Race at the Aztalan Site (47-JE-0001) Jennifer L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northern Flint, Southern Roots: a Diachronic Analysis of Paleoethnobotanical Remains and Maize Race at the Aztalan Site (47-JE-0001) Jennifer L University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations December 2013 Northern Flint, Southern Roots: A Diachronic Analysis of Paleoethnobotanical Remains and Maize Race at the Aztalan Site (47-JE-0001) Jennifer L. Picard University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Picard, Jennifer L., "Northern Flint, Southern Roots: A Diachronic Analysis of Paleoethnobotanical Remains and Maize Race at the Aztalan Site (47-JE-0001)" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 439. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/439 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NORTHERN FLINT, SOUTHERN ROOTS: A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF PALEOETHNOBOTANICAL REMAINS AND MAIZE RACE AT THE AZTALAN SITE (47-JE-0001) by Jennifer L. Picard A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee December 2013 ABSTRACT NORTHERN FLINT, SOUTHERN ROOTS: A DIACHRONIC ANALYSIS OF PALEOETHNOBOTANICAL REMAINS AND MAIZE RACE AT THE AZTALAN SITE (47-JE-0001) by Jennifer L. Picard The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013 Under the Supervision of John D. Richards, Ph.D. Located in Southeast Wisconsin on the west bank of the Crawfish River, the Aztalan site was first settled by horticultural Late Woodland peoples. By the mid- eleventh century A.D., Middle Mississippian migrants arrived from the south. The site was eventually transformed into a fortified village with three platform mounds. During the later component, Middle Mississippian and Late Woodland peoples appear to have coexisted. This thesis consists of a diachronic comparison of floral subsistence remains and maize race at the site. The results of the analysis indicate that while the Late Woodland inhabitants grew maize, food production involving maize and native cultigens was intensified following the appearance of Mississippian traits. The transformation of the site into a fortified agricultural village may have related to intergroup hostility within the region and territorial circumscription. The analysis also identified a possible early Mississippian feasting context. Maize race data indicate both an Eastern Great Lakes connection tied to collared Late Woodland pottery, and a southern, likely American Bottom, connection. This thesis also explores environmental and social explanations for differences between the Aztalan floral assemblage and Late Woodland and Oneota subsistence within the region. ii © Copyright by Jennifer Picard, 2013 All Rights Reserved iii In memory of Lucille Picard iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1) Introduction and Background ...................................................................... 1 Thesis Statement ............................................................................................................. 1 The Late Prehistoric Cultural Landscape in Southeast Wisconsin ................................. 4 Late Woodland Complexity ......................................................................................... 4 Creolization and the Concept of “Mississippianization” ........................................... 5 Southeastern Wisconsin Oneota ................................................................................. 8 Maize Race in the Eastern United States ...................................................................... 10 Archaeological Background: Aztalan (47-JE-0001) ..................................................... 10 Late Woodland and Middle Mississippian at Aztalan .............................................. 12 Layout of the Aztalan Site ......................................................................................... 15 Brief History of Archaeological Investigations at Aztalan ....................................... 17 Previous Floral Research at Aztalan ........................................................................ 22 Other Sources of Subsistence Data ........................................................................... 25 Lake Koshkonong Locality Oneota Sites ..................................................................... 26 Environmental Context ................................................................................................. 30 Vegetation Zones ....................................................................................................... 32 Forest Communities .................................................................................................. 33 Anthropogenic Habitats ............................................................................................ 35 Environmental Catchment Analysis ............................................................................. 37 Methods ..................................................................................................................... 37 Ecozone Comparison between Aztalan and Koshkonong Locality Sites .................. 39 Arable Soils Comparison between Aztalan and Koshkonong Locality Sites ............ 43 Ecotone Comparison between Aztalan and Koshkonong Locality Sites ................... 45 Thesis Organization ...................................................................................................... 48 Chapter 2) Review of Maize Race and Floral Utilization in the Late Prehistoric Eastern United States…………………………………………………………………..50 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 51 Maize Race in the Eastern United States ...................................................................... 51 The Races of Maize ................................................................................................... 56 Genetic Basis for Maize Race Distinctions ............................................................... 58 Cautions Regarding Maize Race Analysis ................................................................ 57 v Other Cultivated Foods ................................................................................................. 60 Regional Floral Subsistence Histories .......................................................................... 62 American Bottom ...................................................................................................... 62 Wisconsin and Northern Illinois ............................................................................... 73 Eastern Great Lakes ................................................................................................. 85 Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 97 Chapter 3) Sample Selection and Methods ................................................................. 101 Samples Selected for Analysis .................................................................................... 101 Contexts from 1984 excavations. ............................................................................ 103 Contexts from 2011 excavations ............................................................................. 106 Methods....................................................................................................................... 114 Flotation Processing ............................................................................................... 114 Floral Analysis ........................................................................................................ 115 1/16” Water-Screened Samples. .............................................................................. 116 Quantitative Comparisons ...................................................................................... 117 Maize Row Number ................................................................................................. 120 Chapter 4) The Aztalan Floral Assemblage: Results and Analysis .......................... 124 Results of Aztalan Flotation Analysis......................................................................... 124 Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Dating .................................................................. 129 Intrasite Analysis ........................................................................................................ 131 Nutshell ................................................................................................................... 131 Zea mays ................................................................................................................. 134 Squash Rind ............................................................................................................ 136 Small Seeds and Cultigens ...................................................................................... 137 Assemblage Diversity .............................................................................................. 142 Comparison with Northeast Mound Structure 1 ..................................................... 144 The Effect of Depositional Context on the Aztalan Assemblage ............................. 149 Maize Race Results and Analysis ............................................................................... 150 Chi-Squared Test of Independence ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Many-Storied Place
    A Many-storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator Midwest Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska 2017 A Many-Storied Place Historic Resource Study Arkansas Post National Memorial, Arkansas Theodore Catton Principal Investigator 2017 Recommended: {){ Superintendent, Arkansas Post AihV'j Concurred: Associate Regional Director, Cultural Resources, Midwest Region Date Approved: Date Remove not the ancient landmark which thy fathers have set. Proverbs 22:28 Words spoken by Regional Director Elbert Cox Arkansas Post National Memorial dedication June 23, 1964 Table of Contents List of Figures vii Introduction 1 1 – Geography and the River 4 2 – The Site in Antiquity and Quapaw Ethnogenesis 38 3 – A French and Spanish Outpost in Colonial America 72 4 – Osotouy and the Changing Native World 115 5 – Arkansas Post from the Louisiana Purchase to the Trail of Tears 141 6 – The River Port from Arkansas Statehood to the Civil War 179 7 – The Village and Environs from Reconstruction to Recent Times 209 Conclusion 237 Appendices 241 1 – Cultural Resource Base Map: Eight exhibits from the Memorial Unit CLR (a) Pre-1673 / Pre-Contact Period Contributing Features (b) 1673-1803 / Colonial and Revolutionary Period Contributing Features (c) 1804-1855 / Settlement and Early Statehood Period Contributing Features (d) 1856-1865 / Civil War Period Contributing Features (e) 1866-1928 / Late 19th and Early 20th Century Period Contributing Features (f) 1929-1963 / Early 20th Century Period
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Gregory Oregon 0171N 12796.Pdf
    CHUNKEY, CAHOKIA, AND INDIGENOUS CONFLICT RESOLUTION by ANNE GREGORY A THESIS Presented to the Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science June 2020 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anne Gregory Title: Chunkey, Cahokia, and Indigenous Conflict Resolution This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Conflict and Dispute Resolution Program by: Kirby Brown Chair Eric Girvan Member and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2020. ii © 2020 Anne Gregory This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii THESIS ABSTRACT Anne Gregory Master of Science Conflict and Dispute Resolution June 2020 Title: Chunkey, Cahokia, and Indigenous Conflicts Resolution Chunkey, a traditional Native American sport, was a form of conflict resolution. The popular game was one of several played for millennia throughout Native North America. Indigenous communities played ball games not only for the important culture- making of sport and recreation, but also as an act of peace-building. The densely populated urban center of Cahokia, as well as its agricultural suburbs and distant trade partners, were dedicated to chunkey. Chunkey is associated with the milieu surrounding the Pax Cahokiana (1050 AD-1200 AD), an era of reduced armed conflict during the height of Mississippian civilization (1000-1500 AD). The relational framework utilized in archaeology, combined with dynamics of conflict resolution, provides a basis to explain chunkey’s cultural impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    SEGMENTED AND ASCENDANT CHIEFDOM POLITY AS VIEWED FROM THE DIVERS SITE BY GLEN ALOIS FREIMUTH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Emeritus R. Barry Lewis, Chair Professor Timothy R. Pauketat Adjunct Professor Thomas E. Emerson Associate Professor Mark W. Mehrer, Northern Illinois University ABSTRACT This study contributes to our understanding of the nature of political control exerted by the Mississippian Cahokia polity over small rural villages in the southern American Bottom. Currently two models, which I call the Segmented and Ascendant Chiefdoms, respectively, provide contrasting explanations of the nature and amount of Cahokia control over rural villages. I examine the fit of these models against archaeological data from the Divers and other regional sites. The analyses range over several main topics, including populations, labor requirements, nonlocal artifacts, provisioning, and rituals. I find that the archaeological patterns expressed at the Divers site best fit a Segmented Chiefdom model wherein political control is decentralized and rural villages retain a high degree of political autonomy. Cahokia, as the American Bottom’s main Mississippian town, has the largest population, physical size, elite status items, and monumental construction which I describe as material domination and political dominance. Political dominance requires manipulation of local leaders and their followers for political and social control and this manipulation was expressed through ritual materials and rituals performed at Cahokia and other mound towns. The Cahokia elite created new rituals and associated material expressions through collective action and attempted to gain control of existing commoner ritual performances and symbols but these and political autonomy largely remained with the commoners who occupied small villages like Divers.
    [Show full text]
  • Parsons Site Ground Stone Artifacts
    84 _______________________________ ONTARIOARCHAEOLOGY _____________________ No. 65/66, 1998 PARSONS SITE GROUND STONE ARTIFACTS Martin S. Cooper INTRODUCTION Two poll end fragments were recovered, both exhibiting battering at the distal end. One of the poll fragments, which is longitudinally A total of 30 ground stone artifacts was split, is polished on its exterior surface. The recovered, including the bit portions of nine other poll portion is trianguloid in cross section celts, eight additional celt fragments, one and has remnant polishing on all three sur- charmstone or pendant preform, a fragment of faces. The remaining probable celt fragments a stone pipe bowl, one whetstone, a portion of include four pieces that have at least one a large metate, four possible abraders, five polished surface and a spall flake that was hammerstones, and one anvilstone. removed from the bit end of a tool, probably due to impact. DESCRIPTION Charm/Possible Pendant Preform Celts An artifact manufactured from fossiliferous The celt fragments consist of nine bit por- red shale was recovered from a post in the tions (Table 43),'two poll (butt) ends, and five east wall of House 8. This possible charmstone generalized fragments. All of these fragmentary or pendant preform is a flat, ovoid pebble, tools are made from hornblende/chlorite measuring 33 mm in length, 21 mm in width schist. The size of these tools is quite variable and 5 mm in thickness. While the lateral edges ranging from 8 g for the smallest to 351 g for of the pebble have been carefully rounded, the largest. On all nine of the bit portions, and both flat surfaces are highly polished, it is crushing and flaking at the bit end together neither notched nor drilled for suspension.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Midwest Archaeological Conference Program
    Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 47 2004 Program and Abstracts of the Fiftieth Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Sixty-First Southeastern Archaeological Conference October 20 – 23, 2004 St. Louis Marriott Pavilion Downtown St. Louis, Missouri Edited by Timothy E. Baumann, Lucretia S. Kelly, and John E. Kelly Hosted by Department of Anthropology, Washington University Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-St. Louis Timothy E. Baumann, Program Chair John E. Kelly and Timothy E. Baumann, Co-Organizers ISSN-0584-410X Floor Plan of the Marriott Hotel First Floor Second Floor ii Preface WELCOME TO ST. LOUIS! This joint conference of the Midwest Archaeological Conference and the Southeastern Archaeological Conference marks the second time that these two prestigious organizations have joined together. The first was ten years ago in Lexington, Kentucky and from all accounts a tremendous success. Having the two groups meet in St. Louis is a first for both groups in the 50 years that the Midwest Conference has been in existence and the 61 years that the Southeastern Archaeological Conference has met since its inaugural meeting in 1938. St. Louis hosted the first Midwestern Conference on Archaeology sponsored by the National Research Council’s Committee on State Archaeological Survey 75 years ago. Parts of the conference were broadcast across the airwaves of KMOX radio, thus reaching a larger audience. Since then St. Louis has been host to two Society for American Archaeology conferences in 1976 and 1993 as well as the Society for Historical Archaeology’s conference in 2004. When we proposed this joint conference three years ago we felt it would serve to again bring people together throughout most of the mid-continent.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates Xii H
    [Ru)Ioc!RBo1, Vol.. 10, 1968, P. 61-114] UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN RADIOCARBON DATES XII H. R. CRANE and JAMES B. GRIFFIN The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The following is a list of dates obtained since the compilation of List XI in December 1965. The method is essentially the same as de- scribed in that list. Two C02-CS2 Geiger counter systems were used. Equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). Dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and in- cluding VII, we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statisti- cal errors of counting, to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest doubling the figures that are given in this list. We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in pre- paring chemical samples and David M. Griffin and Linda B. Halsey in preparing the descriptions. I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES 9240 ± 1000 M-1291. Hosterman's Pit, Pennsylvania 7290 B.C. Charcoal from Hosterman's Pit (40° 53' 34" N Lat, 77° 26' 22" W Long), Centre Co., Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • New Lives for Ancient and Extinct Crops
    Book Review New Lives for Ancient and Extinct Crops Edited by Paul E. Minnis. 2014. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 288 pp. $65.00 (hardcover). ISBN: 978-0-8165-3062- 5. Reviewed by Thomas C. Hart Reviewer address: Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, 2201 Speedway Stop C3200, SAC 4.102, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Email: [email protected] Received: February 8, 2015 Volume: 6(1):116-118 Published: August 19, 2015 © 2015 Society of Ethnobiology In this edited volume, Paul E. Minnis and the chapter In the first chapter, Gayle J. Fritz describes how authors successfully illustrate how archaeological, maygrass (Phalaris caroliniana Walter Poaceae.) was an ethnohistorical, and ethnobotanical data can be important North American grass that was a part of effectively synthesized to provide a detailed account the Eastern Agricultural Complex for at least 3,000 of how ancient and extinct crops were used, as well as years. The earliest evidence for maygrass is found the potential they hold for diversifying global food during the Late Archaic in Illinois, Tennessee, and stocks. The authors explore the ancient uses and Kentucky. Eventually this crop spread out of its contemporary large scale agricultural potentials of native range and encompassed an area from Wiscon- maygrass, goosefoot, sumpweed or marshelder, agave, sin and Pennsylvania, in the north, to Texas and little barley grass, chia, arrowroot, leren, and sama (or Georgia, in the south. This very small seeded grass bitter vetch). Minnis suggests that by looking to the was an important component of the ritual feasts that past, researchers can “pre-screen” species in terms of took place at Cahokia, as evidenced by the abundant looking for genetic material from ancient taxa that remains recovered from sub-Mound 51.
    [Show full text]
  • Noxious and Rangeland Weed Management: Getting the Most out of Spraying Mark Pederson Dow Agrosciences [email protected]
    Noxious and Rangeland Weed Management: Getting the Most Out of Spraying Mark Pederson Dow AgroSciences [email protected] DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Thanks to Pend Oreille County. DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Successful Herbicide Weed Control • Why does the herbicide work better one year and not the next? • What changes from year to year? • Is your equipment in good working order? • Just keeping on doing what you always have done… • And get what you always got! DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only The Variables • Weather • Growing conditions • Temperatures • Wind • Water volume per acre applied • Equipment wear and calibration • You, you, you DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Start with the End in Mind • Visualize what you want to accomplish with every spray job – set expectations • Review records and see what has changed • Are the growing conditions and weeds conducive to weed control? • Recalibrate every year and even do a check up during the spray season • Calibrate every applicator that applies products DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Rates, Carrier & Equipment • Select herbicide product that: – controls the majority of target weeds – use the correct rates (don’t scrimp) • Water carrier per acre – use enough to get the product to the desired site of activity (if herbicide is soil active, it must penetrate the vegetative canopy to get benefit) – Use Syltac or R-11 • Tune-up sprayers and do timely repairs DOW RESTRICTED - For internal use only Adjuvants/Surfactants • Always use Syltac or R-11 • Use
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1954 Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana. William Grant Mcintire Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Mcintire, William Grant, "Prehistoric Settlements of Coastal Louisiana." (1954). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8099. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8099 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HjEHisroaic smm&ws in coastal Louisiana A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by William Grant MeIntire B. S., Brigham Young University, 195>G June, X9$k UMI Number: DP69477 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI DP69477 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest: ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Crops Before Corn an INVESTIGATION of EASTERN AGRICULTURAL COMPLEX PLANTS at the TOM JONES SITE, ARKANSAS
    Crops Before Corn AN INVESTIGATION OF EASTERN AGRICULTURAL COMPLEX PLANTS AT THE TOM JONES SITE, ARKANSAS ROSIE BLEWITT-GOLSCH Corn, Beans, and Squash Eastern Agricultural Complex • Initial domestication ca. 4000 – 3000 BP • Earliest occurrences found in upper South and lower Midwest • Initial evidence of EAC from rock shelters, but difficult to prove that they were actually grown as crops in prehistory Wild-Cultivated-Domesticated Spectrum Activities Outcomes • No intervention • Cultivation - preparing a seed bed, garden, field, • Encourage/tend planting the seeds Clearing out competing however, identical trees to wild plants Bringing water to plants • Domestication - putting during drought different selective Pruning plants pressures on plants and animals; generally genetic Burning and/or phenotypic • Control reproduction plants dependent Transplanting on people Collecting and planting seeds Eastern Agricultural Complex Plant Species • Sumpweed (Iva annua) • Sunflower (Helianthus annus) • Maygrass (Phalaris caroliniana) • Goosefoot (Chenopodium berlandieri) • Knotweed (Polygonum erectum) • Little Barley (Hordeum pusillum) • Squash (Cucurbita pepo) Squash and Gourds • Bottle gourd (date?) • Squash (4400 BP) • Produce starchy seeds but not much flesh • Rinds can be used as floats or containers • Domestication marked by seed enlargement and increase in rind thickness Squash Bottle Gourd Sunflower and Sumpweed • Sunflower (4300 BP) • Sumpweed (3900 BP) • Oily seeds • Domestication marked by increase in seed size Sunflower Sumpweed Goosefoot and Erect Knotweed • Goosefoot (3500 BP) • Erect knotweed (2500 BP) • Starchy seeds, Fall food source • Seed coat thickness, larger perisperm Knotweed Goosefoot Goosefoot Wild goosefoot Domesticated goosefoot Domesticated? variant Wild? variant Erect knotweed – two phenotypes Longer/shorter Thick/thin seed coat Maygrass and Little Barley • Maygrass (date?) • Little barley (date?) • Starchy seeds, Spring resources • Geographic range, quantity little barley Maygrass WHEAT Middle East Domesticated ~7,000 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian Settlement Across the Driftless Area
    WisArch NEWS Fall 2016 Volume 16 Number 2 WisArch News The Newsletter of the Wisconsin Archeological Society Paleoindian Settlement Across the Driftless Area WAS Officers, Chapters….……….. .....2 MessageIn from this the President Issue …… ..…...3 WAS Chapters………………………....4 Chapter Programs………..……...…….5 Devil’s Lake Mound Centennial…....6-9 Regional Research……….……..…10-24 News and Notes on Wisconsin Archaeology……………..……........25-27 Merchandise and Contributing to the Newsletter……………………..……....28 Wis Arch Digital Backissues..……......29 Back Dirt: 100 Years Ago in the Wisconsin Archeologist…………….…30 A Fall View of the Driftless Area in Southwestern Wisconsin from the Summit at Blue Mound State Park. Membership in the Wisconsin Archeological Society………......…….31 Late Paleoindian Copper Corner: Recent Work on Agate Basin in the Updating the the Trempealeau Trempealeau Wittry Archaeological Bluffs………….10 Typology……..15 Project…….…17 WISARCH NEWS VOLUME 16 NUMBER 2 Wisconsin Archeological Society www.wiarcheologicalsociety.org5TU UU5T5T Officers, Chapter Presidents & At Large Advisors 2016 Elected Officers: PresidentU :U Kurt Ahira Sampson, k5TU [email protected] UU5T5T Cell: 414-405-4367 (Elected Spring 2012) Term until Fall of 2016 PresidentU Elect:U Seth Schneider, [email protected] UU5T5T 414-254-5148 (term beginning Fall 2016) SecretaryU :U Jake Pfaffenroth, [email protected] UU5T5T 262-365-3605 (Elected 5-10 Re-elected Fall 2013) (Chair of Multi Media Committee) TreasurerU :U Jake Rieb, [email protected] UU5T5T 608-234-2896 (Elected 5-10 Re-elected Fall 2013) WASU Chapter Presidents & Chapter Vote:U Charles E. Brown Chapter-Madison, WI: Joe Monarski, [email protected] UU5T5T Kenosha County Chapter-Kenosha Public Museum: Donald Shelton, [email protected] UU5T5T Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistaken Identity? Invasive Plants and Their Native Look-Alikes: an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic
    Mistaken Identity ? Invasive Plants and their Native Look-alikes an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic Matthew Sarver Amanda Treher Lenny Wilson Robert Naczi Faith B. Kuehn www.nrcs.usda.gov http://dda.delaware.gov www.dsu.edu www.dehort.org www.delawareinvasives.net Published by: Delaware Department Agriculture • November 2008 In collaboration with: Claude E. Phillips Herbarium at Delaware State University • Delaware Center for Horticulture Funded by: U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Cover Photos: Front: Aralia elata leaf (Inset, l-r: Aralia elata habit; Aralia spinosa infloresence, Aralia elata stem) Back: Aralia spinosa habit TABLE OF CONTENTS About this Guide ............................1 Introduction What Exactly is an Invasive Plant? ..................................................................................................................2 What Impacts do Invasives Have? ..................................................................................................................2 The Mid-Atlantic Invasive Flora......................................................................................................................3 Identification of Invasives ..............................................................................................................................4 You Can Make a Difference..............................................................................................................................5 Plant Profiles Trees Norway Maple vs. Sugar
    [Show full text]