Kiwi 'Drivers' and 'Lookers' : an Analysis and Examination of the Significant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kiwi 'Drivers' and 'Lookers' : an Analysis and Examination of the Significant Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Kiwi ‘Drivers’ and ‘Lookers’ An Analysis and Examination of the Significant Contribution of New Zealand Fleet Air Arm Aircrew, of the British Pacific Fleet, to Allied Naval Operations 1944-1945 A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History at Massey University, Albany, New Zealand. Patrick Jeremy Lyon Thomson 2012 Abstract This thesis addresses a neglected and under-researched area of New Zealand historiography in World War II: the contribution of New Zealand Fleet Air Arm aircrew serving with the British Pacific Fleet (BPF), from December 1944 to the end of hostilities with Japan in August 1945. The operational experiences, services and sacrifices of these airmen are examined within the wider context of New Zealand’s diplomacy and strategy for the Pacific war. Three research questions are posited. First, what were New Zealand’s different responses to Japanese military aggression in the Pacific, from 1941 to 1944, particularly in association with its allies? Second, what was the genesis of the British Pacific Fleet, and what were its structures and strategic functions? Third, in what ways did New Zealand aircrew contribute to the British Pacific Fleet’s Air Arm operations from 1944 to 1945? In memory of my dearly loved eldest son, James David Lyon Thomson - 15 July 1983 to 12 July 2011. Rest In Peace Table of Contents Index of Maps, Illustrations and Photographs p.ii Introduction: Thesis Explanation and Discussion of Sources p.iii Chapter One: New Zealand Responses to the Pacific War 1941-1944 p.1 Section I: 1941 – The Pearl Harbor and Singapore Crises p.2 Section II: 1942 - An ‘Anzaxis’? p.13 Section III: A Troubled Pact 1943-1944 p.22 Chapter Two: Contested Strategies and Logistic Realities p.33 Section I: Quebec, September 1944 - A Decision Made p.35 Section II: The Lethbridge Mission p.44 Section III: The Genesis of the British Pacific Fleet 1944-45 p.54 Chapter Three: ‘Drivers’ and ‘Lookers’ p.62 Section I: New Zealand Naval Airmen p.64 Section II: Aircraft p.71 Section III: British Pacific Fleet Strategies – Preparatory Operations p.76 Chapter Four: British Pacific Fleet - Main Operations p.97 Section I: Operation ‘Iceberg’ - The Sakishima Gunto and Formosa p.98 Section II: Over the Japanese Home Islands p.115 Section III: Courage, Daredevils and POWs p.125 Conclusion p.134 Bibliography p.141 Glossary p.151 Appendix I: Table of Related Allied WWII Conferences p.154 Appendix II: Japanese Aircraft - ‘Bogeys’ p.155 Appendix III: New Zealand Fleet Air Arm Personnel of the British Pacific Fleet, December 1944 to August 1945 p.156 Appendix IV: Table of the British Pacific Fleet’s Air Arm Operations, December 1944 to August 1945 p.162 i Maps Far Eastern Operations p.ix ‘Culverin’ and ‘Sceptre’ p.37 The ‘Middle and Modified Middle Strategies’ p.41 The Western Pacific and Japan p.77 The Indian Ocean p.79 Operation ‘Robson’ p.82 Operation ‘Lentil’ p.86 Operation ‘Meridian I’ p.92 Operation ‘Iceberg’ p.99 Final Operations against Japan – July and August 1945 p.118 Illustrations and Photographs The Pacific War Council, Washington DC, 12 October 1942 p.20 Chiang Kai-shek, Roosevelt and Churchill, Cairo, 25 November 1943 p.27 The Commonwealth Prime Ministers’ Conference, London, 1 May 1944 p.32 The British Chiefs of Staff, 7 May 1945 p.43 The Lethbridge Military Mission to New Zealand, 20 October 1943 p.49 Staff of the British Pacific Fleet, Melbourne, 13 December 1944 p.53 Cover illustration 894 (Seafire) Squadron Line Book p.54 Illustration 894 (Seafire) Squadron Line Book p.62 New Zealand FAA trainees, UK, 1940-41 p.64 Sub. Lieutenant McLennan RNZNVR: 1844 Squadron Line Book p.80 Corsair sketch: 1834 Squadron Line Book p.83 1834 Squadron - Corsairs on Victorious p.89 Clearing Formidable’s deck p.110 An Avenger of 857 Squadron lands on one ‘leg’ p.114 Firefly sketch: ‘Nightmare for Japan’, 1770 Squadron Official Diary p.121 ii Introduction: Thesis Explanation and Discussion of Sources During late 1945 Allied Prisoner of War Investigation teams began enquiries in Pacific and South East Asian territories previously occupied by Japanese forces. The investigators’ focus was upon providing information of relief or closure to the relatives of Allied servicemen officially posted as ‘missing’ in the theatre, as well as bringing alleged war criminals to trial. Two New Zealand Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm pilots, Evan Baxter and John Haberfield, had been ‘… reported missing th since 24 January 1945 … their aircraft [having] failed to return to HMS 1 Illustrious from an attack on [an oil refinery] at Palembang, Southern Sumatra’. Information regarding the fate of the airmen was received from the Japanese military judicial authorities during enquiries made by the War Crimes Co- ordination Section, in Singapore, in late 1945.2 These airmen were representative of a unique cohort of New Zealand World War II servicemen, whose history is yet to be fully researched. This thesis addresses a neglected and under-researched area of New Zealand historiography in World War II: the contribution of New Zealand Fleet Air Arm aircrew serving with the British Pacific Fleet (BPF), from December 1944, to the end of hostilities with Japan in August 1945. The operational experiences, services and sacrifices of these airmen are examined within the wider context of New Zealand’s diplomacy and strategy for the Pacific war. That a relatively small number of New Zealanders participated, on a global scale, does not diminish the historical significance of their contribution to the war against Japan. Three research questions are posited. First, what were New Zealand’s different responses to Japanese military aggression in the Pacific, from 1941 to 1944, particularly in association with its allies? This thesis begins by investigating the strategic situation, in 1941, of New Zealand in the Pacific, the objective being to understand the intersecting strands and overlapping spheres of New Zealand’s 1 Admiralty to N.Z.N.B. 1287 OUT, 090518A/February, 9/2/45. ‘Collated documents relating to the capture of Lts. Baxter and Haberfield and their subsequent execution by the Japanese’, donated by D. Allison. RNZN Museum, Devonport, Auckland, New Zealand. FZP 0004/EZB 0018. 2 New Zealand Naval Secretary to Mrs. M. Baxter, 4 February 1946, ‘Collated documents ….’ iii diplomatic, political and military decision-making. Second, what was the genesis of the British Pacific Fleet, and what were its structures and strategic functions? Third, in what ways did New Zealand aircrew contribute to the British Pacific Fleet’s Air Arm operations from 1944 to 1945? There are four chapters: Chapter One analyses New Zealand‘s limited options and diplomatic frustrations in dealing with its major allies gripped, as it was, by fear of isolation and the threat of invasion by Japanese forces. Explanation of the strategic gestation, the composition and movement of the BPF, and the reasons why Sydney was chosen as its base, are outlined in Chapter Two. Chapter Three describes the airmen, aircraft and strategic purpose of the BPF and explains its activities from Ceylon (Sri Lanka), in late 1944 and early 1945, in preparation for the Fleet’s main operations in the Pacific, later in 1945. Chapter Four is told from the New Zealand airmen’s vantage point: this is marked by a shift in the register and tone of prose, to represent authentic and personal perspectives. Reflections upon the individual circumstances of particular ‘Kiwi’ pilots conclude this chapter. To borrow Prime Minister, Peter Fraser’s words on the matter of New Zealand and the Pacific war, the naval airmen ‘… participated to the fullest possible extent’.3 However, telling the ‘stories’ of young men at war, as absorbing as they may be, has limited value unless broader historical circumstances are canvassed to provide context. Peter Fraser regularly voiced his intention, not always convincingly, for New Zealand to take the fight to Japan; he was thwarted, in part, by the logistics of the Dominion’s geographical isolation and political marginalisation. Yet, pragmatism and the demographics of New Zealand’s small population, alone, could not be held responsible for the military decisions the government made: New Zealand’s largest military effort was deliberately maintained in Europe, not against Japan. It was not by design, but it is nevertheless the fact that New Zealanders of the Fleet Air Arm flew and fought over Japan in 1945, and not servicemen clad in Air Force blue or khaki. 3 Peter Fraser. ‘Conduct of the War Against Japan’, Note by the Joint Secretaries, Meeting of Prime Ministers, P.M.M. (44) 10, 16 May 1944, p.7. CAN A5954 CS 657/4. iv Sources The research conducted for this thesis has had, in order, significant input from Australian, New Zealand and British primary source material. A thorough survey and reading of official histories, books of naval interest and scholarly works was completed in preparation for writing and was continued for subsequent review and reference purposes. As the BPF task force was Sydney-based, an Australasian perspective regarding the genesis of the task force and its operational activities has been adopted. Personal visits for research were made in 2010 to archive repositories in New Zealand and Australia and, in 2011, to the UK. The National Archive of Australia and the Australian War Memorial in Canberra provided a comprehensive body of inter-dominion communication at prime-ministerial level regarding Australian attitudes to the war against Japan, as well as official positions on New Zealand’s war-time decision-making and policy.
Recommended publications
  • AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser
    ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 May 2019: Admiral Sir Timothy P. Fraser: Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff, May 2019 June 2019: Admiral Sir Antony D. Radakin: First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff, June 2019 (11/1965; 55) VICE-ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 February 2016: Vice-Admiral Sir Benjamin J. Key: Chief of Joint Operations, April 2019 (11/1965; 55) July 2018: Vice-Admiral Paul M. Bennett: to retire (8/1964; 57) March 2019: Vice-Admiral Jeremy P. Kyd: Fleet Commander, March 2019 (1967; 53) April 2019: Vice-Admiral Nicholas W. Hine: Second Sea Lord and Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff, April 2019 (2/1966; 55) Vice-Admiral Christopher R.S. Gardner: Chief of Materiel (Ships), April 2019 (1962; 58) May 2019: Vice-Admiral Keith E. Blount: Commander, Maritime Command, N.A.T.O., May 2019 (6/1966; 55) September 2020: Vice-Admiral Richard C. Thompson: Director-General, Air, Defence Equipment and Support, September 2020 July 2021: Vice-Admiral Guy A. Robinson: Chief of Staff, Supreme Allied Command, Transformation, July 2021 REAR ADMIRALS: AUGUST 2021 July 2016: (Eng.)Rear-Admiral Timothy C. Hodgson: Director, Nuclear Technology, July 2021 (55) October 2017: Rear-Admiral Paul V. Halton: Director, Submarine Readiness, Submarine Delivery Agency, January 2020 (53) April 2018: Rear-Admiral James D. Morley: Deputy Commander, Naval Striking and Support Forces, NATO, April 2021 (1969; 51) July 2018: (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Keith A. Beckett: Director, Submarines Support and Chief, Strategic Systems Executive, Submarine Delivery Agency, 2018 (Eng.) Rear-Admiral Malcolm J. Toy: Director of Operations and Assurance and Chief Operating Officer, Defence Safety Authority, and Director (Technical), Military Aviation Authority, July 2018 (12/1964; 56) November 2018: (Logs.) Rear-Admiral Andrew M.
    [Show full text]
  • British Pacific Fleet, 1945
    British Pacific Fleet 1945 Battleships HMS DUKE OF YORK (C-in-C, BPF): CAPT A.D.Nicholl, CBE, DSO HMS KING GEORGE V (VA 2 in C): CAPT B.B.Schofield, CBE HMS ANSON: CAPT A.C.G.Madden HMS HOWE: CAPT H.W.U.McCall, DSO Fleet Aircraft Carriers HMS VICTORIOUS: Rear Admiral M.M.Denny, CB, C8E HMS FORMIDABLE: CAPT W.G.Andrewes, CBE, DSO HMS INDEFATIGABLE: CAPT Q.D.Graham, CBE, DSO HMS INDOMITABLE: CAPT J.A.S.Eccles, CBE HMS IMPLACABLE: CAPT C.C.Hughes-Hallett, CBE Light Fleet Aircraft Carriers HMS COLOSSUS: CAPT G.H.Stokes, CB, DSC HMS GLORY: CAPT A.W.Buzzard, DSO, OBE HMS VENERABLE: CAPT W.A.Dallmeyer, DSO HMS VENGEANCE: CAPT D.M.L.Neame, DSO Escort Aircraft Carriers HMS STRIKER: CAPT W.P.Carne HMS ARBITER: CAPT D.H.Everett, DSO, MBE HMS CHASER: CAPT R.G.Poole HMS RULER: CAPT H.P.Currey, OBE HMS SLINGER: LCDR J.G.Hopkins HMS SPEAKER: CAPT U.H.R.James HMS VINDEX: CDR J.D.L.Williams, DSC HMS REAPER: CDR I.T.Clark, OBE Cruisers HMS BERMUDA: CAPT J.S.Bethell, CBE HMS BELFAST: CAPT R.M.Dick, CBE, DSC HMS EURYALUS: CAPT R.S.Warne, CBE HMS GAMBIA (N.Z.manned): CAPT R.A.B.Edwards, CBE HMS ACHILLES (N.Z.manned): CAPT F.J.Butler, MBE HMS NEWFOUNDLAND: CAPT R.W.Ravenhill, CBE, DSC HMS BLACK PRINCE: CAPT G.V.Gladstone HMS ONTARIO (RCN): CAPT H.T.W.Grant, DSO, RCN HMS SWIFTSURE: CAPT P.V.McLaughlin HMS ARGONAUT: CAPT W.P.McCarthy Fast Minelayers HMS APOLLO: CAPT L.N.Brownfield HMS ARIADNE: CAPT F.B.Lloyd, OBE HMS MANXMAN: CAPT G.Thistleton-Smith, GM Destroyer Depot Ships HMS TYNE: CAPT S.Boucher HMS MONTCLARE: CAPT G.W.Hoare-Smith Destroyers HMS QUADRANT:
    [Show full text]
  • Westland Wessex
    This article is taken from Wikipedia Westland Wessex This article is about the helicopter. For the fixed-wing for rapid starting and thus faster response times.[1] The aircraft, see Westland IV. Wessex could also operate in a wide range of weather conditions as well as at night, partly due to its use of an automatic pilot system. These same qualities that made The Westland Wessex is a British-built turbine-powered the Wessex well-suited to the anti-submarine role also development of the Sikorsky H-34, it was developed lent themselves to the search and rescue (SAR) mission, and produced under license by Westland Aircraft (later which the type would become heavily used for.[1] Westland Helicopters). One of the main changes from Sikorsky’s H-34 was the replacement of the piston-engine powerplant with a turboshaft engine; the Wessex was the first helicopter in the world to be produced in large num- bers that made use of a gas turbine propulsion system.[1] Early models were powered by a single Napier Gazelle engine, later builds used a pair of Rolls-Royce Gnome engines. The Wessex was initially produced for the Royal Navy (RN) and later for the Royal Air Force (RAF); a limited number of civilian aircraft were also produced, as well as some export sales. The Wessex operated as an anti- submarine warfare and utility helicopter; it is perhaps best recognised for its use as a search and rescue (SAR) he- licopter. The type entered operational service in 1961, A pair of Royal Navy Wessex helicopters in the flight deck of the and had a service life in excess of 40 years before being HMS Intrepid, 1968 retired in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Career Guide
    ROYAL NAVAL RESERVE Your career guide YOUR ROLE | THE PEOPLE YOU’LL MEET | THE PLACES YOU’LL GO WELCOME For most people, the demands of a job and family life are enough. However, some have ambitions that go beyond the everyday. You may be one of them. In which case, you’re exactly the kind of person we’re looking for in the Royal Naval Reserve (RNR). The Royal Naval Reserve is a part-time force of civilian volunteers, who provide the Royal Navy with the additional trained people it needs at times of tension, humanitarian crisis, or conflict. As a Reservist, you’ll have to meet the same fitness and academic requirements, wear the same uniform, do much of the same training and, when needed, be deployed in the same places and situations as the regulars. Plus, you’ll be paid for the training and active service that you do. Serving with the Royal Naval Reserve is a unique way of life that attracts people from all backgrounds. For some, it’s a stepping stone to a Royal Navy career; for others, a chance to develop skills, knowledge and personal qualities that will help them in their civilian work. Many join simply because they want to be part of the Royal Navy but know they can’t commit to joining full-time. Taking on a vital military role alongside your existing family and work commitments requires a great deal of dedication, energy and enthusiasm. In return, we offer fantastic opportunities for adventure, travel, personal development and friendships that can last a lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Narrative Ours Is the Epic Story of the Royal Navy, Its Impact on Britain and the World from Its Origins in 625 A.D
    NMRN Master Narrative Ours is the epic story of the Royal Navy, its impact on Britain and the world from its origins in 625 A.D. to the present day. We will tell this emotionally-coloured and nuanced story, one of triumph and achievement as well as failure and muddle, through four key themes:- People. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s people. We examine the qualities that distinguish people serving at sea: courage, loyalty and sacrifice but also incidents of ignorance, cruelty and cowardice. We trace the changes from the amateur ‘soldiers at sea’, through the professionalization of officers and then ships’ companies, onto the ‘citizen sailors’ who fought the World Wars and finally to today’s small, elite force of men and women. We highlight the change as people are rewarded in war with personal profit and prize money but then dispensed with in peace, to the different kind of recognition given to salaried public servants. Increasingly the people’s story becomes one of highly trained specialists, often serving in branches with strong corporate identities: the Royal Marines, the Submarine Service and the Fleet Air Arm. We will examine these identities and the Royal Navy’s unique camaraderie, characterised by simultaneous loyalties to ship, trade, branch, service and comrades. Purpose. We tell the story of the Royal Navy’s roles in the past, and explain its purpose today. Using examples of what the service did and continues to do, we show how for centuries it was the pre-eminent agent of first the British Crown and then of state policy throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellcat Mk.I / Mk.II 7078 US NAVY WWII FIGHTER 1:72 SCALE PLASTIC KIT
    Hellcat Mk.I / Mk.II 7078 US NAVY WWII FIGHTER 1:72 SCALE PLASTIC KIT intro There are few aircraft types that took part in combat during World War Two, that can be described with such one sided outcomes in terms of kill : loss ratio as the Hellcat. Representing the middle of the Grumman Cat lineage, the Hellcat was a unique type right from its beginnings. Success of its older brother, the Wildcat, which carried on its shoulders the bulk of the strain of the Pacific air war in 1942, prompted the US Navy to give Grumman free reign over the independent development of a new fighter. This type was to act as insurance in the event the concept of the F4U Corsair turned out unsuccessful. Grumman designers set forth with the design, with emphasis on ease of manufacture, performance and suitability for carrier ops. On the 30th of June, 1941, as Corsair production was initiating, the Navy signed an order for two prototype XF6F-1s, and a star was born. Original expectations centered around development of the proven F4F Wildcat, which was to be dominated by installation of more powerful engines. As such, this eventually evolved into a new fighter altogether. The US Navy also had accumulated combat experience, and was able to incorporate pilot suggestions into the design. The Hellcat was some 60% heavier than the Wildcat, was more heavily armed, had a more powerful engine, was more heavily armored, carried more fuel and was generally of a more robust construction. The first prototype took to the air on June 26th, 1942, and by January, 1943 equipped the first Navy unit, VF-9, on the deck of the USS Essex.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Airmen Lost in Wwii by Date 1943
    CANADA'S AIR WAR 1945 updated 21/04/08 January 1945 424 Sqn. and 433 Sqn. begin to re-equip with Lancaster B.I & B.III aircraft (RCAF Sqns.). 443 Sqn. begins to re-equip with Spitfire XIV and XIVe aircraft (RCAF Sqns.). Helicopter Training School established in England on Sikorsky Hoverfly I helicopters. One of these aircraft is transferred to the RCAF. An additional 16 PLUTO fuel pipelines are laid under the English Channel to points in France (Oxford). Japanese airstrip at Sandakan, Borneo, is put out of action by Allied bombing. Built with forced labour by some 3,600 Indonesian civilians and 2,400 Australian and British PoWs captured at Singapore (of which only some 1,900 were still alive at this time). It is decided to abandon the airfield. Between January and March the prisoners are force marched in groups to a new location 160 miles away, but most cannot complete the journey due to disease and malnutrition, and are killed by their guards. Only 6 Australian servicemen are found alive from this group at the end of the war, having escaped from the column, and only 3 of these survived to testify against their guards. All the remaining enlisted RAF prisoners of 205 Sqn., captured at Singapore and Indonesia, died in these death marches (Jardine, wikipedia). On the Russian front Soviet and Allied air forces (French, Czechoslovakian, Polish, etc, units flying under Soviet command) on their front with Germany total over 16,000 fighters, bombers, dive bombers and ground attack aircraft (Passingham & Klepacki). During January #2 Flying Instructor School, Pearce, Alberta, closes (http://www.bombercrew.com/BCATP.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Responsibility and Cold War Solidarity Australia in Asia, 1944–74
    COMMONWEALTH RESPONSIBILITY AND COLD WAR SOLIDARITY AUSTRALIA IN ASIA, 1944–74 COMMONWEALTH RESPONSIBILITY AND COLD WAR SOLIDARITY AUSTRALIA IN ASIA, 1944–74 DAN HALVORSON Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463236 ISBN (online): 9781760463243 WorldCat (print): 1126581099 WorldCat (online): 1126581312 DOI: 10.22459/CRCWS.2019 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover image courtesy of the National Archives of Australia. NAA: A1775, RGM107. This edition © 2019 ANU Press Contents Acknowledgements . vii Abbreviations . ix 1 . Introduction . 1 2 . Region and regionalism in the immediate postwar period . 13 3 . Decolonisation and Commonwealth responsibility . 43 4 . The Cold War and non‑communist solidarity in East Asia . 71 5 . The winds of change . 103 6 . Outside the margins . 131 7 . Conclusion . 159 References . 167 Index . 185 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Cathy Moloney, Anja Mustafic, Jennifer Roberts and Lucy West for research assistance on this project. Thanks also to my colleagues Michael Heazle, Andrew O’Neil, Wes Widmaier, Ian Hall, Jason Sharman and Lucy West for reading and commenting on parts of the work. Additionally, I would like to express my gratitude to participants at the 15th International Conference of Australian Studies in China, held at Peking University, Beijing, 8–10 July 2016, and participants at the Seventh Annual Australia–Japan Dialogue, hosted by the Griffith Asia Institute and Japan Institute for International Affairs, held in Brisbane, 9 November 2017, for useful comments on earlier papers contributing to the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – the Evolution of HMS Dorsetshire
    Appendix 1 – The Evolution of HMS Dorsetshire This image and the one on the next page show Dorsetshire in 1930, during builder’s trials1 Dorsetshire in July 19312 Dorsetshire in 1932.At this time her secondary and tertiary armament is still very light, just four single 4-inch guns abreast the forward funnels and four single 2-pdr pompoms abreast the bridge3 This 1948 model, shown to better advantage on the next page, depicts Dorsetshire under refit in 1937 in No. 14 Dock at Portsmouth Dockyard. The twin 4-inch mountings are in place abreast the funnels, as are the octuple 2-pounder pom poms aft of the torpedo tubes.4 Dorsetshire in dock at Singapore after her 1937 refit.5 This image and the one on the next page show how difficult it was for her to engage aircraft attacking from directly ahead. The arrows highlight her guns as follows: blue = twin 4-inch red = quad .5-inch green = octuple 2-pdr pom poms Dorsetshire in 19416 Three shots of Dorsetshire in 1941. The painting of the aft funnel and part of the hull in a light colour was meant to make her appear to be a single-funnelled vessel – a sloop, according to one source. The paint scheme was possibly first applied at Simonstown between 16 and 20 March, since this was apparently Dorsetshire’s only docking between December 1940 and June-July 1941. The top image was taken at Cape Town, possibly between 21 and 23 April 1941. The centre image was presumably taken prior to the June-July refit, since the ship sports what seems to have been the original version of this paint scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM CRADLE to GRAVE? the Place of the Aircraft
    FROM CRADLE TO GRAVE? The Place of the Aircraft Carrier in Australia's post-war Defence Force Subthesis submitted for the degree of MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES at the University College The University of New South Wales Australian Defence Force Academy 1996 by ALLAN DU TOIT ACADEMY LIBRARy UNSW AT ADFA 437104 HMAS Melbourne, 1973. Trackers are parked to port and Skyhawks to starboard Declaration by Candidate I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of the thesis. Allan du Toit Canberra, October 1996 Ill Abstract This subthesis sets out to study the place of the aircraft carrier in Australia's post-war defence force. Few changes in naval warfare have been as all embracing as the role played by the aircraft carrier, which is, without doubt, the most impressive, and at the same time the most controversial, manifestation of sea power. From 1948 until 1983 the aircraft carrier formed a significant component of the Australian Defence Force and the place of an aircraft carrier in defence strategy and the force structure seemed relatively secure. Although cost, especially in comparison to, and in competition with, other major defence projects, was probably the major issue in the demise of the aircraft carrier and an organic fixed-wing naval air capability in the Australian Defence Force, cost alone can obscure the ftindamental reordering of Australia's defence posture and strategic thinking, which significantly contributed to the decision not to replace HMAS Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • Vacancies for Full Time Reserve Service Positions
    VACANCIES FOR FULL TIME RESERVE SERVICE POSITIONS VACANCY AT RNAS YEOVILTON FOR A LT CDR AIRCRAFT ENGINEER AS SO2 MERLIN HC3/3A AND SEA KING HC4 CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS CO-ORDINATOR – REF No 1711140 A vacancy has arisen for a Lt Cdr AE to serve as SO2 Merlin HC3/3A and Sea King HC4 Continuing Airworthiness Co-ordinator, employed by Joint Helicopter Command on FTRS(HC) Terms and Conditions of Service. The post incumbent will be responsible to the Continuing Airworthiness Manager (CAM) for the co- ordination of airworthiness activities and information for both the Merlin HC3/3A and Sea King HC4 Forces, to ensure that the CAM’s Military Aviation Authority (MAA) responsibilities are satisfied. This function shall include ensuring that the standard and presentation of Continuing Airworthiness Engineering (CAE) information is compliant with the MAA Regulatory Publications (MRP) and especially the CAE 4000 series Regulatory Articles. Basic pay will be between £42,314.16 and 50,676.84 per annum depending on increment level. VACANCY AT RNAS YEOVILTON FOR A LT CDR AIRCRAFT ENGINEER AS SO2 LYNX AND WILDCAT CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS CO-ORDINATOR – REF No 1711154 A vacancy has arisen for a Lt Cdr AE to serve as SO2 Lynx and Wildcat Continuing Airworthiness Co- ordinator, employed by Joint Helicopter Command (JHC) on Full Time Reserve Service (Home Commitment) FTRS (HC) Terms and Conditions of Service (TCOS). The post incumbent will be responsible to the Continuing Airworthiness Manager (CAM) for the co- ordination of airworthiness activities and information for the Lynx and Wildcat in the JHC Aviation Reconnaissance Force, to ensure that the CAM’s Military Aviation Authority (MAA) responsibilities are satisfied.
    [Show full text]