DOCSLIB.ORG

Fortnightly Review Are DPP and KMT Views of China Converging?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 20 Global Taiwan Brief Vol 5. Issue1 20 Fortnightly Review Russell Hsiao Are DPP and KMT Views of China Converging? David G. Brown Taiwan and France Expand Relations in the Covid-19 Era I-wei Jennifer Chang How China Could Decide Not to Invade Taiwan Michael Mazza Repelling a Chinese Invasion: The Critical Role of Taiwan’s Ground Forces Charlemagne McHaffie Fortnightly Review The Global Taiwan Brief is a By: Russell Hsiao bi-weekly publication released every other Wednesday and pro- Russell Hsiao is the executive director of the Global Taiwan Institute (GTI) and editor-in-chief of the vides insight into the latest news Global Taiwan Brief. on Taiwan. President Tsai Calls for Dialogue with Beijing in 109th National Day Speech Editor-in-Chief Russell Hsiao Even as the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provocativelyramps up activities in and around Staff Editor the Taiwan Strait and concerns over a possible limited conflict mount, Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英 Katherine Schultz 文), president of the Republic of China (Taiwan), used the firstNational Day speech of her Copy Editor second term to call on Beijing to engage in dialogue with Taipei on the basis of “mutual Marshall Reid respect, goodwill, and understanding.” Like previous National Day speeches, which past The views and opinions expressed presidents of the ROC would use to contextualize and present their cross-Strait policy, this in these articles are those of the year’s speech delivered an overview of the administration’s approach to China. However, authors and do not necessarily re- it undeniably stood out—not because it signaled a major policy change—but because it flect the official policy or position was seemingly calibrated to carefully signal President Tsai’s even-keeled policy, especially of the Global Taiwan Institute. against the backdrop of Beijing’s intensifying pressure campaign against the island-democ- racy. To the casual observer, Tsai’s speech may seem to simply rehash recurring themes To view web sources cited in the from her previous speeches. However, when the current policy context is taken into con- published papers (underlined in printed text), visit http://global- sideration, the subtle yet meaningful signals from President Tsai’s address snap into view. taiwan.org/2020/10/vol-5-is- National Day (國慶日) in Taiwan—also known as Double Ten Day (雙十節)—commemo- sue-20/. rates the start of the Wuchang Uprising (武昌起義) in 1911, which led to the Xinhai Rev- Global Taiwan Institute olution 辛亥革命( ) that deposed the Qing Dynasty and resulted in the establishment of 1836 Jefferson Place NW, the Republic of China (ROC). Reflecting on this momentous occasion in the 109th National Washington DC 20036 Speech, President Tsai stated: [email protected] “In addressing cross-Strait relations, we will not act rashly, and will uphold our prin- To subscribe, visit ciples. Maintaining stability in cross-Strait relations is in the best interests of both http://globaltaiwan.org/sub- sides. We are committed to upholding cross-Strait stability, but this is not something scribe/. Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 20 2 Taiwan can shoulder alone; it is the joint respon- fare of people on both sides.” While Beijing continued sibility of both sides.” to doggedly refuse Tsai’s overtures and insisted that dialogue be based solely on the basis of the so-called “At this stage, the most pressing cross-Strait is- “1992 Consensus,” Tsai used her 2017 speech to im- sue is to discuss how we can live in peace and plore Beijing authorities to consider “new modes” of coexist based on mutual respect, goodwill, and cross-Strait relations. understanding. As long as the Beijing authorities are willing to resolve antagonisms and improve However, the tone of Tsai’s speeches began to shift as cross-Strait relations, while parity and dignity China ratcheted up its multifaceted diplomatic, eco- are maintained, we are willing to work together nomic, and military pressure campaign to coerce Taipei to facilitate meaningful dialogue. This is what the into accepting its negotiating terms, which included people of Taiwan advocate, and it is a cross-par- poaching several of Taiwan’s diplomatic partners and ty consensus.” significantly increasing its military encirclement activi- ties around Taiwan. In her2018 speech, Tsai called out While the remarks themselves do not represent any- Beijing’s “unilateral diplomatic offensive and military thing breathtakingly new, the occasion is notable, coercion [that] have not only harmed cross-Strait re- since National Day is an important symbol in cross- lations. They have also seriously challenged the status Strait relations. Indeed, it commemorates the histori- quo of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.” Yet, cal events that connect the formation of the ROC gov- she continued to maintain a steady hand in managing ernment in Taiwan with China. Moreover, its continued cross-Strait conflict escalation, even as pressure con- official celebration in Taiwan thus marks the continu- tinued to build, both externally and internally. “I will ous existence of that regime for nearly 110 years. At not be provoked into confrontation or conflicts that points in Taiwan’s past—especially in the early years endanger cross-Strait relations, nor will I deviate from of the island’s democratization—it has been a symbol the will of the people, and sacrifice Taiwan’s sovereign- of controversy within Taiwan, acting as a flashpoint in ty,” Tsai insisted. the long-running clash between those who favored outright independence and those who supported uni- Those internal pressures found a release valve as po- fication with China. Nevertheless, previous Double litical unrest in Hong Kong came to a head when the Ten speeches have included consistent themes, such Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aggressively clamped as calls for unity and the overall welfare of the nation, down on protests against a controversial extradition even as the Kuomintang (KMT, 國民黨) and Democrat- law. In her 2019 speech, the Taiwanese president un- ic Progressive Party (DPP, 民進黨) held starkly differ- derscored the unviability of Beijing’s “one country, ent approaches to cross-Strait policy. This was not an two systems” (一國兩制) formula for Taiwan. “The exception under the previous Ma Ying-jeou 馬英九( ) overwhelming consensus among Taiwan’s 23 million and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) administrations. Howev- people is our rejection of ‘one country, two systems,’ er, as David Brown notes in his article in this issue of regardless of party affiliation or political position,” the Global Taiwan Brief, the two political parties’ re- she said. According to GTI’s non-resident senior fel- spective positions on cross-Strait relations appear to low, J. Michael Cole, “Tsai’s speech [in 2019], perhaps, be converging. This trend is reflected in President Tsai’s was intended to appeal to the greatest common de- National Day speeches. nominators within Taiwanese society—freedom and democracy, and opposition to ‘one country, two sys- In her first National Day speech in 2016—after Beijing tems’—while wisely using a combination of “Taiwan,” froze high-level dialogue with Taipei—President Tsai “Republic of China” and “Republic of China (Taiwan)” called on Beijing’s leaders “to face up to the reality that to refer to the nation.” the Republic of China exists” and that “[t]he two sides of the strait should sit down and talk as soon as pos- What emerges from a wholistic reading of President sible.” Furthermore, she stated that “[a]nything can Tsai’s National Day speeches over the past several years be included for discussion, as long as it is conducive is the clear evolution in her approach to cross-Strait to the development of cross-Strait peace and the wel- relations. Carefully calibrated signals found through- Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 20 3 out the speeches reflect a convergence of the posi- The main point: President Tsai’s call for dialogue with tions of the major political parties. Making clear this Beijing in her 2020 National Day speech, even as China latter point, in a press release further elaborating on ratchets up tension, is a carefully calibrated signal— the 2020 speech, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC, not only to Beijing, but also to the United States that 大陸委員會)—the cabinet-level agency in charge of Taiwan can and should be trusted. cross-Strait policy—stated: “The MAC noted that the *** statement conveyed not only the unanimous position and consensus of the people of Taiwan and all politi- Survey: Taiwanese People’s “Will to Fight” Spikes as cal parties, but a responsible approach to maintaining China Ties Deteriorate and US-Taiwan Relations Im- peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.” Moreover, in prove expressing its grievances against Beijing’s recalcitrant position, the MAC did not mince words on the key In recent remarks made at a think tank event, White sticking point: House National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien stat- ed openly that Taiwan should prepare to deter a Chi- “The MAC expressed strong dissatisfaction and nese invasion. Speaking at the Aspen Institute, O’Brien regret over the Taiwan Affairs Office’s consistent stated: “I think Taiwan needs to start looking at some responsibility-shirking and criticism, refusal to asymmetric and anti-access area denial strategies and join Taiwan in promoting cross-Strait peace, and so on and really fortify itself in a manner that would de- coercion of Taiwan into accepting the premise of ter the Chinese from any sort of amphibious invasion the “One China Principle” that leaves no space or even a gray zone operation against them.” While for the survival of the Republic of China.” not directly addressed, a subtext for the broader issue raised by the US national security adviser is Taiwan’s As noted earlier, concerns over a possible conflict in degree of readiness for a Chinese invasion, as well as the Taiwan Strait are mounting.
Recommended publications
  • Writing Taiwan History: Interpreting the Past in the Global Present

    Writing Taiwan History: Interpreting the Past in the Global Present

    EATS III Paris, 2006 Writing Taiwan History: Interpreting the Past in the Global Present Ann Heylen Research Unit on Taiwanese Culture and Literature, Ruhr University Bochum [email protected] Do not cite, work in progress Introduction Concurrent with nation building is the construction of a national history to assure national cohesion. Hence, the collective memory is elevated to the standard of national myth and most often expressed in the master narrative. I may refer here to Michael Robinson’s observation that “the state constructs and maintains a ‘master narrative’ of nation which acts as an official ‘story of the nation’. This master narrative legitimates the existence of the state and nation internally; it is also projected externally, to legitimate a nations’ existence in the world community”.1 But in as much as memory is selective, so also is the state-sanctioned official narrative, and it has become commonplace that changes in the political order enhance and result in ideologically motivated re-writing of that history in spite of its claims at objectivity and truth. The study of the contemporary formation of Taiwan history and its historiography is no exception. In fact, the current activity in rewriting the history is compounded by an additional element, and one which is crucial to understanding the complexity of the issue. What makes Taiwanese historiography as a separate entity interesting, intriguing and complex is that the master-narrative is treated as a part of and embedded in Chinese history, and at the same time conditioned by the transition from a perceived to a real pressure from a larger nation, China, that lays claim on its territory, ethnicity, and past.
  • Here Are to Subscribe, Visit Several Factors That Militate Against This Move

    Here Are to Subscribe, Visit Several Factors That Militate Against This Move

    Global Taiwan Brief Vol. 5, Issue 5 Global Taiwan Brief Vol 5. Issue1 5 KMT Elects New Chairman in Attempt to Regain Youth Votes By: Russell Hsiao and Ingrid Bodeen Implications of Coronavirus Outbreak on Taiwan’s Campaign for the World Health Organization By: I-wei Jennifer Chang Reinvigorating Taiwan’s Role as Asia’s NGO Hub By: J. Michael Cole An American Perspective on Australia’s Approach to the Taiwan Strait By: Michael Mazza Potential Downsides to US-China Trade Tensions on Taiwan’s Economy By: Ali Wyne KMT Elects New Chairman in Attempt to Regain Youth Votes The Global Taiwan Brief is a bi-week- ly publication released every other By: Russell Hsiao and Ingrid Bodeen Wednesday and provides insight into Russell Hsiao is the executive director of the Global Taiwan Institute and the editor-in-chief the latest news on Taiwan. of the Global Taiwan Brief. Ingrid Bodeen is currently a student at George Washington Editor-in-Chief University and an intern at the Global Taiwan Institute. Russell Hsiao In the first significant temperature taken of the political climate within Taiwan after the Staff Editor Katherine Schultz January 2020 presidential and legislative elections, the Nationalist Party (Kuomintang Copy Editor or KMT) held a special by-election on March 7 to elect the Party’s new chairman. Eligi- Marshall Reid ble party members had to choose between two candidates: former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌, b. 1952) and legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣, b. 1972). The elec- The views and opinions expressed tion—scheduled after the former chairman and members of the Party’s Central Standing in these articles are those of the Committee (CSC) resigned—saw Chiang emerge as the clear victor.
  • Taiwan and China's Cross-Strait Relations" (2018)

    Taiwan and China's Cross-Strait Relations" (2018)

    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-18-2018 Contending Identities: Taiwan and China's Cross- Strait Relations Jing Feng [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Recommended Citation Feng, Jing, "Contending Identities: Taiwan and China's Cross-Strait Relations" (2018). Master's Projects and Capstones. 777. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/777 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Contending Identities: Taiwan and ​ China’s Cross-Strait Relationship Jing Feng Capstone Project APS 650 Professor Brian Komei Dempster May 15, 2018 2 Abstract Taiwan’s strategic geopolitical position—along with domestic political developments—have put the country in turmoil ever since the post-Chinese civil war. In particular, its antagonistic, cross-strait relationship with China has led to various negative consequences and cast a spotlight on the country on the international diplomatic front for close to over six decades. After the end of the Cold War, the democratization of Taiwan altered her political identity and released a nation-building process that was seemingly irreversible. Taiwan’s nation-building efforts have moved the nation further away from reunification with China.
  • Imaginary War with China: Is the 1992 Consensus an Essential Element In

    Imaginary War with China: Is the 1992 Consensus an Essential Element In

    Imaginary War With China: Is The 1992 Consensus an Essential Element in Promoting Peace Across Taiwan Strait? Ching-Hsin Yu,* Ching-Hsing Wang,† and Dennis Lu-Chung Weng‡ Abstract This study aims to examine the relationship between individuals’ attitudes toward the 1992 consensus and their support for Taiwan in the name of the Republic of China (R.O.C) without declaring independence. Given President Tsai Ing-wen’s refusal to recognize the existence of the 1992 consensus that provides the basis for dialogue between Taiwan and China, there is a pressing need to understand the role of the 1992 consensus in Taiwanese people’s support for Taiwan under the R.O.C constitutional framework. By using data from the 2017 Taiwan National Security Survey, this study finds that people with higher levels of support for the 1992 consensus are more likely to support Taiwan in the name of the R.O.C without declaring independence. This implies that from the public’s perspective, the acknowledgement of the 1992 consensus is a required condition to maintain the status quo for Taiwan. Consequently, President Tsai and her administration might need to rethink about their policy of denying the existence of the 1992 consensus. Keywords: 1992 consensus, Taiwan, R.O.C., Taiwan independence, presidential approval. * Distinguished Research Fellow, Election Study Center, National Chengchi University, email: [email protected]. † Postdoctoral Fellow, Hobby School of Public Affairs, University of Houston, email: [email protected]. ‡ Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Sam Houston State University, email: [email protected]. 1 Introduction The independence-unification issue has been the most salient political issue in Taiwan that has played an important role in domestic political competition as well as the development of cross-strait relations.
  • The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan Independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)

    The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan Independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Dalei Jie University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Jie, Dalei, "The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010)" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 524. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/524 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rise and Fall of the Taiwan independence Policy: Power Shift, Domestic Constraints, and Sovereignty Assertiveness (1988-2010) Abstract How to explain the rise and fall of the Taiwan independence policy? As the Taiwan Strait is still the only conceivable scenario where a major power war can break out and Taiwan's words and deeds can significantly affect the prospect of a cross-strait military conflict, ot answer this question is not just a scholarly inquiry. I define the aiwanT independence policy as internal political moves by the Taiwanese government to establish Taiwan as a separate and sovereign political entity on the world stage. Although two existing prevailing explanations--electoral politics and shifting identity--have some merits, they are inadequate to explain policy change over the past twenty years. Instead, I argue that there is strategic rationale for Taiwan to assert a separate sovereignty. Sovereignty assertions are attempts to substitute normative power--the international consensus on the sanctity of sovereignty--for a shortfall in military- economic-diplomatic assets.
  • Bulletin 183 - 04/01 – Direct Trade Between Taiwan/Mainland China

    Bulletin 183 - 04/01 – Direct Trade Between Taiwan/Mainland China

    Ship Type: All Trade Area: Taiwan/China Bulletin 183 - 04/01 – Direct Trade between Taiwan/Mainland China While there have been recent press reports of improving trade relations between mainland China and Taiwan, and of some local ships sailing directly between the two countries, please note that Chinese and Taiwanese regulations still prohibit ships from trading / navigating directly between ports in the two countries. In a recent incident a ship sailed from a Taiwanese port to a mainland Chinese port without stopping at any other country. The ship called and sailed from the mainland Chinese port without any repercussions. However, when the ship called at a Taiwanese port at a later date, the local authorities discovered that the ship had sailed direct from Taiwan to mainland China, the Ministry of Transportation and Communication in Taiwan imposed a fine of approximately US$90,000 on the ship. Taiwanese 'Regulation For Relationship Between Mainland and Taiwanese People' as defined by Mainland Affairs Council Bureau of Taiwan' issued on 18 Sept 1992, states ''Rule 30: Foreign ships, civil aviation or other transportation means, are not allowed to trade/navigate directly into ports, airports between Taiwanese and mainland region. All liner trade/transport between Taiwanese port and mainland ports via a third countries are also prohibited. The Ministry of Transportation and Communication Department will restrict and prohibit the entry of the ships, civil aviation or other transportation means if these are hired by mainland people, legal entities, organisation, association, investor or operator. Rule 85: A penalty of NT$3 million upto NT$15million would be imposed against the personnel when the ship, civil aviation or other transportation breached rule 30 herein.
  • Generational Differences in Attitudes Towards Cross-Straits Trade

    Generational Differences in Attitudes Towards Cross-Straits Trade

    Generational Differences in Attitudes towards Cross-Straits Trade Ping-Yin Kuan, Ph. D. Associate Professor Department of Sociology & International Program in Asia-Pacific Studies (Joint Appointment) National Chengchi University Taipei, Taiwan E-mail: [email protected] A paper prepared for the “Conference on the Politics of Polarization: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective” organized by The Taiwan Democracy Program at the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford University, Oct. 17-18, 2014. The Sunflower Movement erupted in March and April this year because of the hasty passing of the Cross-Straits Service Trade Agreement by the Legislative Yuan.This movement has certainly made many people in Taiwan aware of the anxiety and distrust the younger generation has towards China. Regardless of the possibility of party politics and power strugglehaving played a role in triggering the protest, the Movement may have been a culminating event summarizing the gradually developing generational differences in attitudes towards the cross-straits political and economic relationship. As Wang Jenn-hwan(2014), a Taiwanese sociologist, commented recently in Taipei Times, unlike those above the age of 40, who have gone through the KMT’s “greater China” education and have certain understanding about China, younger people in Taiwan grew up during the process of democratization and have no emotional attachment to China. The purpose of this paper is to explore important macro and micro factors that may have formed the social basis of these generational differences. The exploration pooled national statistics and large-scale social surveys across many years to investigate the trend of these differences.
  • Rise of China and the Cross-Strait Relations by Philip Yang National Taiwan University

    Rise of China and the Cross-Strait Relations by Philip Yang National Taiwan University

    tik 5th Europe-Northeast Asia Forum i The Taiwan Strait and Northeast Asian Security Berlin, 15-17 December 2005 A conference jointly organised by Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin, the Korean Institute for International Studies (KIIS), Seoul, and the Federal Ministry of Defence, Berlin Discussion Paper Do Note Cite or Quote without Author’s Permission ftung Wissenschaft und Pol Sti Rise of China and the Cross-Strait Relations by Philip Yang National Taiwan University German Institute for International and Security Affairs SWP Ludwigkirchplatz 3–4 10719 Berlin Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org In East Asia, the rise of China has dominated most regional policy discussion and deliberation. In almost every field of regional concerns, China’s rise has posed new challenges and brought profound implications. The impacts of China's rise on cross-strait relations are also heatedly discussed in Taiwan’s academia as well as media. China’s surging economy and newfound political clout expand its tool box in handling cross-strait relations and complicate U.S. role in dealing with the cross-strait political and military stalemate. With its missile deployments directed at Taiwan and the adoption of an anti-secession law threatening the use of force to deter Taiwan’s pursuance of de jure independence, China’s coercive cross-strait policy could severely challenge the island and its most important ally, the United States. However, China’s rising economic power and political status in the region have also been translated into a growing pool of “soft” power, affording Beijing increasing leverage on cross-strait issues.
  • Nyusps on the Move

    Nyusps on the Move

    NYUSPS ON THE MOVE ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 Dear Friends and Members of the NYU School of Professional Studies Community, During my time serving as the interim dean of the NYU School of Professional Studies, I’ve had the distinct pleasure and opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the critical role this institution plays in educating the future leaders of industry. Throughout its history, the School has evolved to meet the needs of the students and the professional communities it serves. As we embark on a new phase in the School’s continued growth and development, I cannot help but marvel at the energy, the momentum, and the deep sense of commitment to advance forward and build upon our many achievements. NYUSPS is on the move! NYUSPS faculty members are distinguished experts in their areas of specialty who not only teach our students, but who mentor and encourage them to push beyond their limits and break new ground. This past year, as in previous years, their research in their areas of discipline has helped to inform the dialogue in the classroom, inspiring our students to be the best and brightest in their fields. Their work also has served as a trusted resource and as a valuable asset to industry, which looks to NYUSPS to pave the way in identifying new trends and in exploring critical issues. The School’s unsurpassed connections to industry leaders, who are innovators in their fields, is a truly distinguishing factor in what makes it so unique. Top executives choose to align themselves with us for a reason—they know that NYUSPS owns the space in delivering high-quality, professionally focused education in NYC, across the nation, and around the globe.
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

    CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web

    Order Code RL30341 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy – Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei Updated March 12, 2001 Shirley A. Kan Specialist in National Security Policy Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress This CRS Report was initiated upon a request from Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott in the 106th Congress. China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy – Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei Summary On July 9, 1999, questions about the “one China” policy arose again after Lee Teng-hui, then-President of Taiwan, characterized cross-strait relations as “special state-to-state ties.” The Clinton Administration responded that Lee’s statement was not helpful and reaffirmed the “one China” policy and opposition to “two Chinas.” Beijing, in February 2000, issued its second White Paper on Taiwan, reaffirming its “peaceful unification” policy but with new warnings about the risk of conflict. There also have been questions about whether and how President Chen Shui-bian, inaugurated in May 2000, might adjust Taiwan’s policy toward the Mainland. In Part I, this CRS report discusses the policy on “one China” since the United States began in 1971 to reach understandings with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) government in Beijing. Part II documents the evolution of the “one China” principle as articulated in key statements by Washington, Beijing, and Taipei. Despite apparently consistent statements over almost three decades, the critical “one China” principle has been left somewhat ambiguous and subject to different interpretations among Washington, Beijing, and Taipei.
  • The Formation of a Taiwanese American Identity

    The Formation of a Taiwanese American Identity

    Forthcoming in the Journal of Chinese Overseas Understanding Intraethnic Diversity: The Formation of a Taiwanese American Identity Bing Wang and Min Zhou University of California, Los Angeles Bing Wang received his M.A. in Asian American Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles. He is currently teaching English in Taiwan. Email: [email protected] Min Zhou, Ph.D., is Professor of Sociology and Asian American Studies, Walter and Shirley Wang Endowed Chair in US-China Relations and Communications, and Director of Asia Pacific Center at the University of California, Los Angeles. Direct all correspondence to: [email protected] Acknowledgments The authors thank Valerie Matsumoto and Jinqi Ling for their helpful comments in the earlier version of the paper. This research is partially supported by the Walter and Shirley Wang Endowed Chair in US-China Relations and Communications. Abstract: This paper fills a scholarly gap in the understanding of the intraethnic diversity via a case study of the formation of a Taiwanese American identity. Drawing on a review of the existing scholarly literature and data from systematic field observations, as well as secondary data including content analysis of ethnic organizations’ mission statements and activity reports, we explore how internal and external processes intersect to drive the construction of a distinct Taiwanese American identity. The study focuses on addressing three interrelated questions: (1) How does Taiwanese immigration to the United States affect diasporic development? (2) What contributes to the formation of a Taiwanese American identity? (3) In what specific ways is the Taiwanese American identity sustained and promoted? We conceive of ethnic formation as an ethnopolitical process.
  • Taiwán Se Reafirma

    Taiwán Se Reafirma

    __________ TAI__ WAN__ 2020 10 CLAVES y 10 PERSONAJES d e 2019 Taiwán se reafirma www.igadi.gal ________________ ________________TAIWAN 2020 10 CLAVES y 10 PERSONAJES de 2019 Taiwán se reafirma Marcadamente, el año político se ha distinguido en Taiwán del año cronológico. En efecto, en el primer caso se iniciaría el 24 de noviembre de 2018, cuan- do se celebraron unas decisivas elecciones locales conocidas como “nueve en uno”, y du- raría hasta el 11 de enero de 2020, cuando se celebraron los no menos decisivos comicios le- fénix para consumar una victo- en todos los órdenes ha eviden- gislativos y presidenciales. Fue, ria sin paliativos frente a su más ciado la existencia de firmes por tanto, un año largo, marca- directo rival, el nacionalista Han convicciones democráticas en do por un tenso pulso entre el Kuo-yu, remontando la difícil una sociedad ampliamente mo- PDP y el KMT y entre Taipéi y coyuntura que le había aboca- vilizada y cuyo protagonismo se Beijing. Y, en resumidas cuen- do a presentar la dimisión de la aquilata y afianza para decidir tas, un ejercicio en el que Tsai presidencia de su formación en autónomamente su futuro. Ing-wen resurgió como el ave 2018. El transcurso del ejercicio Taiwan 2020: 10 claves y 10 personajes de 2019 www.IGADI.gal 2 ________________ ________________TAIWAN 2020 1º 10 CLAVES y 10 PERSONAJES de 2019 Discurso y contra discurso a Taiwán se reafirma través del Estrecho En su mensaje de Año Nuevo, la presidenta Tsai Ing-wen enun- ció cuatro imperativos para si- tuar las relaciones a través del Estrecho sobre una buena vía: reconocer la existencia de la Re- pública de China (Taiwán); res- petar la preferencia de los 23 millones de taiwaneses por la libertad y la democracia; abor- dar las diferencias entre los dos lados de manera pacífica y bajo el principio de igualdad; nego- ciado a la revitalización de la complementar los ocho puntos ciar con el gobierno de Taiwán gran nación china.