DOCSLIB.ORG

PERESTROIKA—A NEW STAGE in SOVIET REFORM by GREGORY FELTON B.A. University of British Columbia, 1979 a THESIS SUBMITTED IN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PERESTROIKA—A NEW STAGE in SOVIET REFORM by GREGORY FELTON B.A. University of British Columbia, 1979 a THESIS SUBMITTED IN PERESTROIKA—A NEW STAGE IN SOVIET REFORM By GREGORY FELTON B.A. University of British Columbia, 1979 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 1988 (£) Gregory Felton, 1988 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of IhuTlCA/. Sdl&Mtf The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date DE-6(3/81) i ABSTRACT Perestroika, unlike previous attempts at economic reform, represents the beginning of a new era in post-war Soviet politics. If one were to categorize the major Soviet leaders since Stalin it would be more accurate to term Khrushchev a liberal Stalinist, Brezhnev a conservative Stalinist, and Gorbachev, may be properly classified as an anti-Stalinist. Gorbachev's accession to power represents the beginning of what might be termed post-post-Stalin reform. To illustrate the uniqueness of perestroika, this thesis is structured around a comparison of Gorbachev's economic, political, and social reforms with those of Nikita Khrushchev. A contrast with Khrushchev is necessary because it is impossible to determine the uniqueness of perestroika and to draw informed conclusions about Gorbachev unless the record of the first-post Stalin reformer is examined. Because Gorbachev and Khrushchev are both reformers, it is to be expected that they should share certain common objectives. But the similarities are far less significant than the differences. The differences between Gorbachev's and Khrushchev's approaches to reform are a function both of substantive policy differences and historical circumstance. Historical Context Khrushchev came to power at a time when the Soviet Union was weak relative to the United States. Externally, the most pressing need was for the Soviet Union to achieve military parity with the United States. Internally, Khrushchev's first years were ones of struggle for absolute leadership with other Politburo figures who had differing notions of reform. The world that Brezhnev and his successors bequeathed to Gorbachev bore little resemblance to the one which Stalin left to Khrushchev. By the time of Gorbachev's accession to power, the Soviet Union had become the military equal of the United States. Political Reform Khrushchev's main objective was to weaken the power of the bureaucracy largely in order to enhance his own personal power. Gorbachev's focus is less Stalin than it is the Stalinist system. The lack of subordination of political and economic reform to the pursuit of personal one-man rule marks perestzoika as a distinct improvement over de- Stalinization. Economic Reform In economic policy, Khrushchev followed Stalin's practice of meeting economic problems with administrative measures. Although Khrushchev made his reputation by denouncing Stalin's leadership, he did nothing to address the root of the Soviet Union's troubles—the Stalinist economic system. Perestroika is theoretically superior to de-Stalinization because Gorbachev eschews administrative tinkering in favour of economic change. Gorbachev has rediscovered the co-operative socialism and limited iii tolerance for free-enterprise of the 1920s. The implication of this return to 'Leninism' is an admission that the Stalinist system is a failure. CONCLUSION The essence of Khrushchev's reforms, and their subsequent failure, can be traced to his fixation with appearance over substance. For all of his 'liberal' reforms, Khrushchev is essentially a 'Stalinist' politician. Perestzoika is superior to de-Stalinization both because of historical circumstance and substantive philosophical differences. Gorbachev's return to Leninist principles effectively ends the period of reformed Stalinism. But the objective need for reform does imply its necessary success. There are many obstacles to effecting deep change in the Soviet Union, obstacles which cannot be surmounted soon. It cannot be expected that a people will cast off the habits of a lifetime. Nonetheless, Gorbachev's reforms are rigorous and potentially longlasting, as opposed to Khrushchev's 'administrative' changes which did not really address the flaws of the Soviet system. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract Introduction: History of Reform CHAPTER I Historical Context CHAPTER II Political Reform CHAPTER III Economic Reform CHAPTER IV Conclusions Notes Bibliography 1 INTRODUCTION My purpose in writing this thesis is to demonstrate that Mikhail Gorbachev's program of perestzoika, or restructuring, marks the beginning of a new stage in post• war Soviet politics. To defend this position, I will contrast pezeatzoika with Nikita Khrushchev's de- Stalinization reforms of the 1950s and 1960s. A contrast with Khrushchev is necessary because it is impossible to draw informed conclusions about Gorbachev unless the record of the first post-Stalin reformer is examined. It is incumbent upon us, as would-be interpreters of perestroifca, to understand the theory and practice of Khrushchev's reforms in order to determine why he was ousted and to conclude therefrom what significance his political demise may mean for Gorbachev. Without an appreciation of previous reforms and the context in which such changes take place, any analysis or prognosis of pezeBtzoika is ahistorical and hence devoid of meaning. As Stephen Cohen observed,"...most Sovietological studies of conflict (over change] in post-Stalin politics lack any historical dimension, whereas much of that conflict actually grows out of—and thus cannot be fully understood apart from—the historical events...."1 To build the proper historical foundation for a discussion of perestroifca, this thesis begins with the event that inaugurated the era of de- Stalinization—the death of Joseph Stalin. Reform—A Historic Overview The fact that Stalin died in March, 1953 did not diminish the influence his criminal past and his centralized economic system had on future generations of Soviet decision-makers. With his death, the task of his successors was to reform the terroristic Stalinist political system while being careful to avoid precipitating a genuine, comprehensive debate on the Soviet system and Stalin's leadership. Khrushchev's de-Stalinization represents the first stage of post-Stalin reform. In fact, all post-Stalin reform is essentially de-Stalinization. How a leader deals with the 'Stalin question' classifies him either as a 'liberal' or 'conservative' reformer. Some might object to my use of the terms 'liberal' and 'conservative' with respect to Soviet politics. These labels have a very specific meaning in Western culture and are based upon the value-laden notions of Lockean or Burkean democracy with their attendant virtues of laissez-faire capitalism, individual rights and universal suffrage. In this thesis I employ 'liberal' and 'conservative' in the broadest sense: 'liberal' refers to a reformer who seeks to effect economic and political change. The 'liberal' reformer recognizes that economic reform requires political reform and that political reform requires a proper understanding of history. Broadly speaking, Khrushchev's 'liberalism' was based upon a willingness to expose Stalin's failures to discredit his personal rule, while leaving the basic Stalinist approach to government and economic policy intact. Ultimately, though, Khrushchev was turned out of office in 1964 by 'conservatives' who were uncomfortable with Khrushchev's unorthodoxy. The dominant characteristic of the 'conservative' leadership that followed Khrushchev was a quiet continuation of established Khrushchevian social and economic reforms at the mid-bureaucratic level, coupled with a reimposition of bureaucratic authority at the highest political level. This reimposition of bureaucratic order required an end to challenges to Soviet authority. Thus, the Brezhnev leadership terminated Khrushchev's historical revisionism in favour of the positive re-evaluation of Stalin, his cult, and his policies. This reimposition of bureaucratic authority should not be taken to mean that the post-Khrushchev leadership formally abjured reform. In fact, the Brezhnev/Kosygin era may be understood not as a struggle between reformist and anti-reformist forces, as it is often argued, but rather as a competition between two competing approaches to reform. As the reader will discover, one of the dominant themes of this thesis is the concept of reform as a constant feature of Soviet politics from 1953 to the present. It is better to think of post-Stalinist Soviet history as a sequence of leaderships dedicated to differing understandings of reform. If one were to categorize the major Soviet leaders since Stalin it would be more accurate to term Khrushchev a liberal Stalinist, Brezhnev a conservative Stalinist, and Gorbachev, may be properly classified as an anti-Stalinist. Gorbachev's accession to power represents the beginning of what might be termed post-post-Stalin reform. Because
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1960
    WARNING: DICTATOR KHRUSHCHEV, THE GREATEST PERPETRATOR OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AGAIN DESECRATES AMERICAN SOIL! HANGMAN OF UKRAINE COMES TO THE UNITED NATit IS TO REVILE AMERICA AND SELL HIS GENOGIDAL PROPAGANDA THE PEOPLE vs. KHRUSHCHEV CRIMES OF KHRUSHCHEV HE WANTS TO BURY US! Editor's Note: The following chronological dates of Khrushchev's criminal deeds against the Ukrainian and other AGAINST THE UKRAINIAN peoples are extracted from Handbook for "Summit," compiled, documented and edited by SPX Research Associates in Washing­ PEOPLE ton for the Minute WonWn of the United States of America, Inc. on the basis of House Committee on Un-American Activities U. S. OFFICIAL DOCUMENT REVEALS HIS CRIMINAL Reports. 1-6, entitled, The Crimes of Khrushchev: ATTACKS ON UKRAINIANS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER WORLD WAR II Evidential Outline, Chronology of Criminal Record and Associations 1894 — Born, Kalinovka, United States in a pressured Kursk, Russia, parents agri­ reversal of established Amer­ cultural workers. Three years ican foreign policy. of grade school equivalence. Results of the man-made 1912 — Conscript, Russian famine in Ukraine: — Imperial Army. 4,800,000 human deaths. De­ 1917 (Summer) — Deserter; crease of resources: Horses —, returns to Kursk (Autumn) — 5.300,000 (1928), 2,600.000 The Revolution, (1933); Cattle — 8.600,000 1918 — Drafted in Red (1928). 4,400,000 (1933); — Army. Sheep — 8,100,000 . (1928), , 1920 (Oct.) — Khrushchev 2,000.000 (1933); Swine .— discharged from Red Army. A 7,000,000 (1928), 2,000,660 member.of the Cac party, goes (1933). to work in mines aa laborer. 1934 — Promoted to mem­ 1920 (Nov.) ~ Ukraine bership in CPSU Central Com­ seized by Moscow and Georgia mittee.
    [Show full text]
  • Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’S Only First Lady
    Outraging the People by Stepping out of the Shadows Gender roles, the ‘feminine ideal’ and gender discourse in the Soviet Union and Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’s only First Lady. Noraly Terbijhe Master Thesis MA Russian & Eurasian Studies Leiden University January 2020, Leiden Everywhere in the civilised world, the position, the rights and obligations of a wife of the head of state are more or less determined. For instance, I found out that the President’s wife in the White House has special staff to assist her in preforming her duties. She even has her own ‘territory’ and office in one wing of the White House. As it turns out, I as the First Lady had only one tradition to be proud of, the lack of any right to an official public existence.1 Raisa Maximovna Gorbacheva (1991) 1 Translated into English from Russian. From: Raisa Gorbacheva, Ya Nadeyus’ (Moscow 1991) 162. 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Gender roles and discourse in Russia and the USSR ................................................................. 17 The supportive comrade ................................................................................................................. 19 The hardworking mother ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia As a Humanitarian Aid Donor
    OXFAM DISCUSSION PAPER 15 JULY 2013 RUSSIA AS A HUMANITARIAN AID DONOR ANNA BREZHNEVA AND DARIA UKHOVA This paper addresses the role of Russia as a humanitarian aid donor in the context of the increasing participation in international aid of so-called ‘new’, ‘emerging’ (or ‘re-emerging’), or ‘non-traditional’ donors. In the recent years Russia has made a number of international aid commitments, for example within the G8, marking its re-emergence as an international donor since the disintegration of the Soviet Union. In line with Russia’s increasing international aid commitments, the level of Russian humanitarian aid has also been increasing over recent years. Nonetheless, the country still faces several obstacles in developing its donor capacity. Oxfam Discussion Papers Oxfam Discussion Papers are written to contribute to public debate and to invite feedback on development and humanitarian policy issues. They are ‟work in progress‟ documents, and do not necessarily constitute final publications or reflect Oxfam policy positions. The views and recommendations expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of Oxfam. For more information, or to comment on this paper, email Daria Ukhova [[email protected]] www.oxfam.org CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................ 2 1 Introduction .................................................................... 4 2 Institutional arrangements .............................................. 5 3 How much aid? ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cannibalism in Stalin's Russia and Mao's China*
    East European Quarterly, XLI, No. 2 June 2007 CANNIBALISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA AND MAO'S CHINA* Steven Bela Vdrdy Agnes Huszar Vardy Duquesne University We have already published a number of scholarly studies about the horrors of the slave labor camps in the Soviet Gulag.' We have also written several newspaper articles on this topic for various Hungarian and Hungarian-American publications.^ But we have not as yet explored specifically the presence of cannibalism in these slave labor camps, which appears to have been a rather widespread phenomenon. Development ofthe Soviet Gulag The roots of the Soviet Gulag reach back to the Bolshevik Revolu- tion of 1917, and more specifically to the secret police organization, the Cheka, established and directed until his death by the Polish renegade, Felix Dzerzhinski (1877-1926). The first of such camps was established in 1918 in the Solovesky Monastery on the Solovki Island ofthe White Sea, when that remote monastery and much of that small island was transformed into a slave labor camp. The goal was to collect the repre- sentatives of the old Czarist regime, and either "reeducate" or extermi- nate them as potential opponents to the Soviet regime. In this monastery, and in the scores of temporary shelters established after 1918 on that island, about twenty thousand political prisoners perished during the 1920s under the most gruesome circumstances. The creation of this "death camp" on Solovki Island in 1918 was soon followed by the establishment of many hundreds, and later many thousands of such camps throughout the Soviet Union. In 1934 a special organization, the Glavnoy Upravneliye LAGerey [GULAG] (Chief Ad- ministration of Labor Camps), was established specifically to administer this network of forced labor camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalin's Baku Curve: a Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution
    Stalin’s Baku Curve: A Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution by Fuad Akhundov A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Education Leadership Higher and Adult Education, OISE University of Toronto © Copyright by Fuad Akhundov 2016 Stalin’s Baku Curve: A Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution Fuad Akhundov Master of Arts in Education Leadership Higher and Adult Education, OISE University of Toronto 2016 Abstract The Stalin’s Baku Curve, a Detonating Mix of Crime and Revolution presents a brief insight into the early period of activities of one of the most ominous political figures of the 20th century – Joseph Stalin. The major emphasis of the work is made on Stalin’s period in Baku in 1902-1910. A rapidly growing industrial hub providing almost half of the world’s crude oil, Baku was in the meantime a brewery of revolutionary ideas. Heavily imbued with crime, corruption and ethnic tensions, the whole environment provided an excellent opportunity for Stalin to undergo his “revolutionary universities” through extortion, racketeering, revolutionary propaganda and substantial incarceration in Baku’s famous Bailov prison. Along with this, the Baku period brought Stalin into close contact with the then Russian secret police, Okhranka. This left an indelible imprint on Stalin’s character and ruling style as an irremovable leader of the Soviet empire for almost three decades. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work became possible due to the tremendous input of several scholars whom I want to hereby recognize. The first person I owe the paper Stalin’s Baku Curve, a Detonating Mix of Crime and Revolution to is Simon Sebag Montefiore, an indefatigable researcher of former Soviet and pre-Soviet history whom I had a pleasure of working with in Baku back in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccauley Stalinism the Thirties.Pdf
    Stalin and Stalinism SECOND EDITION MARTIN McCAULEY NNN w LONGMANLONDON AND NEW YORK The Thirties 25 and October 1929, and Stalin declared on 7 November 1929 that the great PART TWO: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS 2 THE movement towards collectivisation was under way [8]. The Politburo stated on 5 January 1930 that large-scale kulak production was to be replaced by large- scale kolkhoz production. Ominously, for the better-off farmers it also proclaimed the THIRTIES ‘liquidation of the kulaks as a class*. It was hoped that the collectivisation of the key grain-growing areas, the North Caucasus and the Volga region, would be completed by the spring of 1931 at the latest and the other grain-growing areas by the spring of 1932. A vital role in rapid collectivisation was played by the 25,000 workers who descended on the countryside to aid the ‘voluntary* process. The ‘twenty-five thousanders*, as they were called, brooked no opposition. They were all vying with one another for the approbation of the party. Officially, force was only permissible against kulaks, but the middle and poor peasants were soon sucked into the maelstrom of violence. Kulaks were expelled from their holdings and their POLITICS AND THE ECONOMY stock and implements handed over to the kolkboz. What was to become of them? Stalin was brutally frank: ‘It is ridiculous and foolish to talk at length After the war scare of 1927 [5] came the fear of foreign economic intervention. about dekulakisation. ... When the head is off, one does not grieve for the hair. Wrecking was taking place in several industries and crises had occurred in There is another question no less ridiculous: whether kulaks should be allowed to join the collective farms? Of course not, others — or so Stalin claimed in April 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • A Psychobiographical Study of Joseph Stalin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by South East Academic Libraries System (SEALS) A PSYCHOBIOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF JOSEPH STALIN Vuyiswa Matsolo Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Artium Psychology (Research) in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Nelson Mandela University April 2019 Supervisor: Dr. A. Sandison ii Photography of Joseph Stalin Source: Khlevniuk, 2015. iii Abstract Joseph Stalin was the dictator of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953. Stalin ruled by terror and millions of people died during his term as leader. Stalin was known as an evil man, however, he was also hailed as a hero who was able to transform Russia into a major super power. Stalin died in 1953 at the age of 74, after suffering a massive stroke. The aim of the current study was to explore and describe the personality development of Stalin, by applying Alfred Adler’s theory of Individual Psychology and Theodore Millon’s Biopsychosocial Model of Personality to the context of his life experiences. The research design is a psychobiography, which is a single case study, and non-probability purposive sampling was used to select Stalin. The data consisted of primary and secondary data sources that described Stalin’s life experiences, and Yin’s (1994) guidelines for data collection were followed for data collection, which include using multiple sources of evidence, creating a case study database, and keeping and maintaining a reliable chain of evidence. The data was analysed in accordance to Miles and Huberman’s (1994a) model of data analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid 2Nd Overseas Small Business Firms
    USAID 2ND OVERSEAS SMALL BUSINESS FIRMS FRANKFURT, GERMANY MARCH 3 – MARCH 4, 2020 HOSTED BY BUREAU FOR MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF SUPPORT OPERATIONS (M/OSO) – 1 – SMALL BUSINESS FIRMS TABLE OF CONTENT SMALL BUSINESS FIRMS PAGES 1 – 69 LARGE BUSINESS PARTICIPANTS PAGE 70 USAID PARTICIPANTS PAGES 71 – 73 GOVERNMENT PARTICIPANTS PAGE 74 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS PAGE 75 Photo Credit: Left: USAID Cambodia Center: USAID Kyrgyzstan Right: USAID Jordan SMALL BUSINESS FIRMS A&A 20 F ST NW STE 700 Organizational consultants in finance and technology. A&A idealizes and operates WASHINGTON , DC 20001-6705 USA as a high-end consultancy in every sense of the word. From assessment and http://www.adincorp.com advisory to expert implementation and execution as well as training and support, Aditya Dahagam the Firm and its consultants practice sound professionalism with the requisite VP - Growth & Solutions knowledge, skills and abilities to provide creative solutions for our Customers. [email protected] A2F Consulting LLC 7220 WISCONSIN AVE STE 210 A2F Consulting is a US- and Germany-based boutique consulting firm established BETHESDA , MD 20814-4855 USA in 2007. Our team provides a broad range of advisory services in financial and https://www.a2f-c.com private sector development, including policy advice, institutional assessments and Diti Chatterjee evaluations of programs. Acting Lead of Economic Evaluations [email protected] Our teams consist of highly experienced experts with institution-building and Elisabeth Ron-Camara technical assistance backgrounds in finance and the private and public sectors, Executive Vice President including Microfinance, SME Banking, Rural/Agricultural Finance, Gender and [email protected] Financial Inclusion, Infrastructure, Technology/MIS, Process Optimization & Change Management, and Training & Capacity Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Economy in Poland
    AGRICULTURE AND FOOD ECONOMY IN POLAND MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT WARSAW 2011 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGRICULTURE AND FOOD ECONOMY IN POLAND Collective work edited by: Teresa Jabłońska - Urbaniak WARSAW, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword by the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development 5 GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT POLAND 7 AGRICULTURE 12 Land resources and its utilisation structure 12 Agricultural production and economy in 2010 16 Agriculture in particular regions 17 Supplying the agricultural sector with means of production 19 Value of agricultural production and price relations 22 Agricultural production and selected foodstuffs markets 23 ɴ§kNTkKwUhk\oo<U3 27 ɴô|3kTkKw 27 ɴ»k|<wU3wNTkKw 29 ɴ±ÿo|hh\kw\Ukw<UhNUwhk\|wTkKwo 32 ɴôhk\|w<\UTkKw 32 ɴÚwTkKw 34 ɴí\|NwkU33TkKw 37 ɴÚ<NKTkKw 40 ɴÂ\UTkKw 44 ɴ»<o9TkKw 45 Consumption of foodstuffs 47 PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES AND QUALITY SUPPORT POLICY 50 Discover Great Food programme 51 Regional and traditional products 53 Integrated agricultural production 55 Protection of plant genetic resources in agriculture 57 BIOFUELS 60 RURAL AREAS 65 Rural population 65 Labour force participation and human capital in rural areas 67 Rural infrastructure 68 Development of entrepreneurship and agri-tourism in rural areas 70 SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES 75 Direct payments 75 Support for rural areas 76 TABLE OF CONTENTS ɴð|kN­N\hTUwíNU(\kʜʚʚʞɪʜʚʚʠ ʡʠ ɴôáíɭðowk|w|k<U3UÚ\kU<ow<\U\(w9»\\ôw\k 77 ɴð|kN­N\hTUwík\3kTTʜʚʚʡɭʜʚʛʝ 78 Fisheries 81 DISCUSSING THE SHAPE OF CAP BEYOND
    [Show full text]
  • Innovations at the World Food Programme
    Rome, June 01 2018 Volume 2 Innovations at the World Food Programme Innovations at the World Food Programme Personal Experiences of World Food Programme Alumni Innovators The World Food Programme Alumni Network Published by: The World Food Programme Alumni Network https://wpfalumni.wfp.org Joseph Kaifala, Editor Innovations at the World Food Programme Personal Experiences of Alumni Innovators The World Food Programme Alumni Network Disclaimer The opinions expressed are those of the individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme (WFP) or the WFP Alumni Network. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this book rests solely with the authors. Publication of this book does not imply WFP or WFP Alumni Network endorsement of the opinions expressed. Copyright © 2018 WFP Alumni Network All rights reserved. Book and cover design, Joseph Kaifala Front cover image: School Feeding (Burundi), WFP/Hugh Rutherford Dedication To those who devote their lives to humanitarian service with the World Food Programme; to the resilience, courage and determination of those in the places they serve; to the mothers and children who are recipients of their nutritious food, and to the 65 million displaced people around the world. Foreword At the World Food Programme (WFP), innovation has been at our core from the very beginning. For decades, WFP’s undeterred focus on reaching people in need has driven us to constantly look for new approaches to food assistance in even the most precarious environments. This book tells that story. It shows in detail how, over the past four decades, creative minds at WFP have worked together on innovations in programmes, delivery systems, and even in back office processes to make WFP more efficient and effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Russian Women in the 1920S & 1930S
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 8-19-2015 Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s Marcelline Hutton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the European Languages and Societies Commons, Modern Art and Architecture Commons, Modern Literature Commons, Russian Literature Commons, Theatre and Performance Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hutton, Marcelline, "Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s" (2015). Zea E-Books. Book 31. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/31 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Marcelline Hutton Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s The stories of Russian educated women, peasants, prisoners, workers, wives, and mothers of the 1920s and 1930s show how work, marriage, family, religion, and even patriotism helped sustain them during harsh times. The Russian Revolution launched an economic and social upheaval that released peasant women from the control of traditional extended fam- ilies. It promised urban women equality and created opportunities for employment and higher education. Yet, the revolution did little to elim- inate Russian patriarchal culture, which continued to undermine wom- en’s social, sexual, economic, and political conditions. Divorce and abor- tion became more widespread, but birth control remained limited, and sexual liberation meant greater freedom for men than for women. The transformations that women needed to gain true equality were post- poned by the pov erty of the new state and the political agendas of lead- ers like Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the World's Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2016 (MRG)
    State of the World’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 2016 Events of 2015 Focus on culture and heritage State of theWorld’s Minorities and Indigenous Peoples 20161 Events of 2015 Front cover: Cholitas, indigenous Bolivian Focus on culture and heritage women, dancing on the streets of La Paz as part of a fiesta celebrating Mother’s Day. REUTERS/ David Mercado. Inside front cover: Street theatre performance in the Dominican Republic. From 2013 to 2016 MRG ran a street theatre programme to challenge discrimination against Dominicans of Haitian Descent in the Acknowledgements Dominican Republic. MUDHA. Minority Rights Group International (MRG) Inside back cover: Maasai community members in gratefully acknowledges the support of all Kenya. MRG. organizations and individuals who gave financial and other assistance to this publication, including the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. © Minority Rights Group International, July 2016. All rights reserved. Material from this publication may be reproduced for teaching or other non-commercial purposes. No part of it may be reproduced in any form for Support our work commercial purposes without the prior express Donate at www.minorityrights.org/donate permission of the copyright holders. MRG relies on the generous support of institutions and individuals to help us secure the rights of For further information please contact MRG. A CIP minorities and indigenous peoples around the catalogue record of this publication is available from world. All donations received contribute directly to the British Library. our projects with minorities and indigenous peoples. ISBN 978-1-907919-80-0 Subscribe to our publications at State of www.minorityrights.org/publications Published: July 2016 Another valuable way to support us is to subscribe Lead reviewer: Carl Soderbergh to our publications, which offer a compelling Production: Jasmin Qureshi analysis of minority and indigenous issues and theWorld’s Copy editing: Sophie Richmond original research.
    [Show full text]