DOCSLIB.ORG

7.1 Winter 2014 Inside+Covers.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7.1 Winter 2014 Inside+Covers.Pdf Volume 7 Issue 1 Winter 2014 A Journal of Georgetown University’s Tocqueville Forum on the Roots of American Democracy Editor-in-Chief Hannah Schneider Executive Editor Jordan Rudinsky Managing Editor Christina Eickenroht Section Editors Amanda Wynter (The Forum) ZongXian Eugene Ang (The Chamber) Andrew Schilling (The Archive) Michael Lessman (The Sanctuary) Christina Eickenroht (The Parlor) George Prugh (The Clock Tower) Utraque Unum Georgetown University’s seal is based directly on the Great Seal of the United States of America. Instead of an olive branch and arrows in the Amer- ican eagle’s right and left talons, Georgetown’s eagle is clutching a globe and calipers in its right talon and a cross in its left talon. The American seal’s eagle holds a banner in its beak that states, E Pluribus Unum, or “Out of Many, One”, in reference to the many different people and states creating a union. The Georgetown seal’s eagle holds a banner in its beak that states, Utraque Unum. As the official motto of Georgetown University, Utraque Unum is often translated as “Both One” or “Both and One” and is taken from Paul’s epistle to the Ephesians. This motto is found in a Latin translation of Ephesians 2:14: ipse est enim pax nostra qui fecit utraque unum. The King James Version of the Bible says, “For He [Christ] is our peace, who hath made both one”. Utraque Unum is the Latin phrase to describe Paul’s concept of unity between Jews and Gentiles; that through Jesus Christ both are one. In view of the Georgetown seal, the motto represents pursuing knowledge of the earthly (the world and calipers) and the spiritual (the cross). Faith and reason should not be exclusive. In unity faith and reason enhance the pursuit of knowledge. Acknowledgements The publication of Utraque Unum was made possible by the generous support of Bill Mumma, Georgetown University Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service Class of 1981, as well as the Collegiate Network. The Tocqueville Forum on the Roots of American Democracy additionally wishes to acknowledge the generous support of The Veritas Fund as administered by the Manhattan Insti- tute, the Thomas W. Smith Foundation, and the Intercollegiate Studies Institute. The Tocqueville Forum promotes events and activities devoted to furthering and deepening student understanding of the American constitutional order and its roots in the Western philosophical and religious traditions. The Tocqueville Fo- rum sponsors these activities solely through the contributions of generous sup- porters of its mission. If you would like further information about supporting the Tocqueville Forum, please e-mail [email protected] or visit http://government.georgetown.edu/tocquevilleforum. As always, we welcome your thoughts and comments regarding this journal. If you are or once were a Georgetown University student, professor or staff mem- ber we would welcome the opportunity to review your work for publication in Utraque Unum. In addition to writers, we are looking for section editors, art- ists, graphic designers and web designers. Please e-mail the editors at utraque. [email protected] for these inquiries. Cultivating Knowledge of America and the West TOCQUEVILLE FORUM AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY www.TocquevilleForum.org | Ph 202.687.8501 T | Utraque Unum Winter 2014 Volume 7, Issue 1 Table of Contents From the Editor-in-Chief . .1 About The Tocqueville Forum The University, by Professor Joshua Mitchell . 2 The Forum (Feature Articles) Lactantius & Religious Freedom, by Louis Cona . 4 Morality and the Mortal God, by ZongXian Eugene Ang . 10 American Individualism and Its Discontents, by Amanda Wynter . 15 The Chamber (Articles on Law and Politics) The Nexus between Religious Homogeneity and Political Stability, by Su Lyn Lai . .21 Marriage and the Constitution, by Andrew Schilling . .27 The Sanctuary (Articles on Religion and Theology) A System of Love: Understanding “Faith” through Newman and Balthasar, by Christopher Cannataro . .30 Interfaith Dialogue and Ethics of Authenticity, by Aamir Hussain . 33 A Tale of Two Cities: The Dialectic of Law and Grace and the Political Realism of Martin Luther’s Doctrine of the Two Kingdoms, by Caleb Morell . .37 The Archive (Articles on History) The Rise and Fall of Doubt: The Development of the Office of the Promoter of Faith in the Canonization Proceedings of the Roman Catholic Church, by Peter Prindiville . .44 The “Genocide” Controversy: A Historical Re-Reinterpretation of the Ukrainian Famine (1930-33), by Joshua Schoen . 48 Monumental Warning, Guilt, and Invisibility, by Sofia Layanto. 51 The Parlor (Articles on Literature, Film, Music, Theater, and Art) From the Unity of Two, The Diversity of One: Eve, The Tragic Hero in Paradise Lost, by Beatriz Albornoz . 54 Illustrations of Don Quixote: Art and Music Since 1605, by Maria Teresa Roca de Togores . 60 Reflections on Storytelling: Metaliterature in the Decameron, by Irene Kuo . 66 The Clock Tower (Articles on Georgetown) “An Intense Interrogation of Self”—An Interview with John Glavin, by Michael Fischer . .70 Opening the Vault: Unleashing Georgetown’s Hidden History, by Kevin D . Sullivan . 73 On the Disposition of All Things: Reflections for Hoyas from Georgetown Legend Father James V. Schall, S.J. .76 Endnotes. 80  | The Editor’s Desk ear Reader, In an age of waning attention spans, when it seems only Buzzfeed and blockbusters Dsucceed in holding captive audiences, those of us who labor over far less flashy creations— scholarly journals—must ask ourselves the obvious question: why do we even bother? Political philosopher Alexis de Tocqueville predicted that as America marches toward the demo- cratic age, Americans would become more and more fond of “general ideas.” As a result, he argued, it will be increasingly difficult to find a person with an original idea, and once he is found, he will be ostracized. All of us in the democratic age will grow afraid of differing opinions. It seems that even in the university original ideas are almost as unwelcome as they are in political discourse, or among the public in general. What seem to be original ideas are often simply bedizened versions of the same politically correct, sanctioned concepts—Hollywood’s new versions of “believe in yourself” or postmodernism’s battle cry of relativism. A student must only ask a faculty member behind closed doors about the struggle of choosing research topics while seeking tenure to realize that the university is not the threshold for open discourse that it once was. Researchers who seem to be demonstrating unpopular conclusions can easily be excluded from scholarly forums. This is why we bother with journals. We do not expect this collection of unusual ideas to hold the attention or win the approval of every member of the American public because that is precisely not the point. We must, however, begin our revanche into territory that at least permits us to disagree. This journal is for those who still want to engage in the grappling of minds that has produced great thinkers from Plato to Tocqueville himself. This journal is for those who believe that truth is an im- portant enough concept to be argued about. I must commend all of the editors for their conscientious attention to each essay and for never forgetting that it is by tending to the seemingly insignificant details that delicate habits of thinking are formed. I must especially thank my executive editor, Jordan Rudinsky, for the countless ways in which he selflessly served the journal. I am delighted to pass the honor of serving as editor-in- chief into his able hands for the coming semester. Finally, I would be remiss not to thank professor Joshua Mitchell for his practical and ideological support of the journal. I am personally grateful for his mentorship and his encouragement to think rigorously and creatively, both inside and outside of the classroom. Hannah G. Schneider Editor-in-Chief Utraque Unum — Winter 2014 | 1 ABOUT THE FORUM The University Joshua Mitchell he Winter 2014 issue of Utraque Unum here to stay, and that we ought not to fight it now before you, in which thought- tooth-and-nail. He also thought, however, that T ful undergraduates from Georgetown democratic man tended to go too far; and that University have written about a broad array of for the democratic age not to end badly, some ideas, ancient and modern, which ought to con- effort to avoid the perfectionist impulse would cern thoughtful citizens everywhere, prompts be necessary. the question: what is the particular excellence of Let us focus, then, on the university. What a University? is its peculiar excellence? By itself, independent Here at Georgetown, and elsewhere around of the modifications we might wish to bring to the United States, we often hear reference to bear, what is it constituted to do? Today, we “our community,” or occasionally, to “our Uni- increasingly hear that a university should pro- versity community.” Seldom do we hear, sim- vide students with “skills,” and that what they ply, “our University.” Why might this be so? learn ought to be measurable. I do not doubt What is to be gained by referring to a univer- that in some domains of knowledge this aspira- sity as a “community”? To whom, moreover, tion is well-founded. I do not think, however, would this act of renaming appeal, and why? that a university can long remain a “university” I suspect Tocqueville might answer that in the without a more capacious and less measurable democratic age, with its never-ending rush aspiration as well, namely, that its members un- to perfect the world, we are apt to look at all derstand themselves to be actively involved in ancient institutions, with their long-standing the only institution in the known universe com- traditions, protocols, and formalities, as ob- mitted to the civil discussion of ideas of the sort structions that stand in the way of this grand that bear on the question: how are we to live perfectionist project.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DELIBERATE DIFFERENCES Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States
    A REPORT PUBLISHED BY POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DELIBERATE DIFFERENCES Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States by Pam Chamberlain PRA POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES ABOUT POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Political Research Associates (PRA) is an independent, nonprofit research center that exposes and challenges the Right and larger oppressive movements, institutions, and forces. PRA provides accurate applied research and useful analytic tools to inform and support progressive activism that promotes equality and justice. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Pam Chamberlain is a researcher at PRA. Political Research Associates 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Somerville, MA 02144 Tel: (617) 666-5300 Fax: (617) 666-6622 [email protected] www.publiceye.org August, 2004 © 2004, Political Research Associates ISBN: 0-915987-18-x When referencing this document, we recommend the following citation: Chamberlain, Pam. Deliberate Differences: Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism in the United States. Somerville, Mass.: Political Research Associates, 2004. Design by Hird Graphic Design Cover photos by: top, Lonny Shavelson/www.photowords.com. and bottom, Jim West, Impact Digitals Acknowledgements eliberate Differences: Progressive and Conservative Campus Activism is a publication of DPolitical Research Associates (PRA). In every sense, this report has been a collabo- rative effort from its inception. Jean Hardisty, President Emerita of PRA, originally con- ceived the Campus Activism Project as an extension of earlier PRA work on conservative campus groups. The PRA staff team—Nikhil Aziz, Chip Berlet, Shelly Harter, Tom Louie, Namorya Nelson, and Palak Shah—all lent their creativity, talent, and careful attention to the many stages of the project. Chip and Nikhil, in particular, contributed to our understanding of social movement theory and its application to campus activism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1960
    WARNING: DICTATOR KHRUSHCHEV, THE GREATEST PERPETRATOR OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AGAIN DESECRATES AMERICAN SOIL! HANGMAN OF UKRAINE COMES TO THE UNITED NATit IS TO REVILE AMERICA AND SELL HIS GENOGIDAL PROPAGANDA THE PEOPLE vs. KHRUSHCHEV CRIMES OF KHRUSHCHEV HE WANTS TO BURY US! Editor's Note: The following chronological dates of Khrushchev's criminal deeds against the Ukrainian and other AGAINST THE UKRAINIAN peoples are extracted from Handbook for "Summit," compiled, documented and edited by SPX Research Associates in Washing­ PEOPLE ton for the Minute WonWn of the United States of America, Inc. on the basis of House Committee on Un-American Activities U. S. OFFICIAL DOCUMENT REVEALS HIS CRIMINAL Reports. 1-6, entitled, The Crimes of Khrushchev: ATTACKS ON UKRAINIANS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER WORLD WAR II Evidential Outline, Chronology of Criminal Record and Associations 1894 — Born, Kalinovka, United States in a pressured Kursk, Russia, parents agri­ reversal of established Amer­ cultural workers. Three years ican foreign policy. of grade school equivalence. Results of the man-made 1912 — Conscript, Russian famine in Ukraine: — Imperial Army. 4,800,000 human deaths. De­ 1917 (Summer) — Deserter; crease of resources: Horses —, returns to Kursk (Autumn) — 5.300,000 (1928), 2,600.000 The Revolution, (1933); Cattle — 8.600,000 1918 — Drafted in Red (1928). 4,400,000 (1933); — Army. Sheep — 8,100,000 . (1928), , 1920 (Oct.) — Khrushchev 2,000.000 (1933); Swine .— discharged from Red Army. A 7,000,000 (1928), 2,000,660 member.of the Cac party, goes (1933). to work in mines aa laborer. 1934 — Promoted to mem­ 1920 (Nov.) ~ Ukraine bership in CPSU Central Com­ seized by Moscow and Georgia mittee.
    [Show full text]
  • Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’S Only First Lady
    Outraging the People by Stepping out of the Shadows Gender roles, the ‘feminine ideal’ and gender discourse in the Soviet Union and Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’s only First Lady. Noraly Terbijhe Master Thesis MA Russian & Eurasian Studies Leiden University January 2020, Leiden Everywhere in the civilised world, the position, the rights and obligations of a wife of the head of state are more or less determined. For instance, I found out that the President’s wife in the White House has special staff to assist her in preforming her duties. She even has her own ‘territory’ and office in one wing of the White House. As it turns out, I as the First Lady had only one tradition to be proud of, the lack of any right to an official public existence.1 Raisa Maximovna Gorbacheva (1991) 1 Translated into English from Russian. From: Raisa Gorbacheva, Ya Nadeyus’ (Moscow 1991) 162. 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Gender roles and discourse in Russia and the USSR ................................................................. 17 The supportive comrade ................................................................................................................. 19 The hardworking mother ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cannibalism in Stalin's Russia and Mao's China*
    East European Quarterly, XLI, No. 2 June 2007 CANNIBALISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA AND MAO'S CHINA* Steven Bela Vdrdy Agnes Huszar Vardy Duquesne University We have already published a number of scholarly studies about the horrors of the slave labor camps in the Soviet Gulag.' We have also written several newspaper articles on this topic for various Hungarian and Hungarian-American publications.^ But we have not as yet explored specifically the presence of cannibalism in these slave labor camps, which appears to have been a rather widespread phenomenon. Development ofthe Soviet Gulag The roots of the Soviet Gulag reach back to the Bolshevik Revolu- tion of 1917, and more specifically to the secret police organization, the Cheka, established and directed until his death by the Polish renegade, Felix Dzerzhinski (1877-1926). The first of such camps was established in 1918 in the Solovesky Monastery on the Solovki Island ofthe White Sea, when that remote monastery and much of that small island was transformed into a slave labor camp. The goal was to collect the repre- sentatives of the old Czarist regime, and either "reeducate" or extermi- nate them as potential opponents to the Soviet regime. In this monastery, and in the scores of temporary shelters established after 1918 on that island, about twenty thousand political prisoners perished during the 1920s under the most gruesome circumstances. The creation of this "death camp" on Solovki Island in 1918 was soon followed by the establishment of many hundreds, and later many thousands of such camps throughout the Soviet Union. In 1934 a special organization, the Glavnoy Upravneliye LAGerey [GULAG] (Chief Ad- ministration of Labor Camps), was established specifically to administer this network of forced labor camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Olin Foundation in 1953, Olin Embarked on a Radical New Course
    THE CHRONICLE REVIEW How Right­Wing Billionaires Infiltrated Higher Education By Jane Mayer FEBRUARY 12, 2016 ​ If there was a single event that galvanized conservative donors to try to wrest control of higher ​ education in America, it might have been the uprising at Cornell University on April 20, 1969. That afternoon, during parents’ weekend at the Ithaca, N.Y., campus, some 80 black students marched in formation out of the student union, which they had seized, with their clenched fists held high in black­power salutes. To the shock of the genteel Ivy League community, several were brandishing guns. At the head of the formation was a student who called himself the "Minister of Defense" for Cornell’s Afro­American Society. Strapped across his chest, Pancho Villa­style, was a sash­like bandolier studded with bullet cartridges. Gripped nonchalantly in his right hand, with its butt resting on his hip, was a glistening rifle. Chin held high and sporting an Afro, goatee, and eyeglasses reminiscent of Malcolm X, he was the face of a drama so infamous it was regarded for years by conservatives such as David Horowitz as "the most disgraceful occurrence in the history of American higher education." John M. Olin, a multimillionaire industrialist, wasn’t there at Cornell, which was his alma mater, that weekend. He was traveling abroad. But as a former Cornell trustee, he could not have gone long without seeing the iconic photograph of the armed protesters. What came to be ​ ​ known as "the Picture" quickly ricocheted around the world, eventually going on to win that year’s Pulitzer Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalin's Baku Curve: a Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution
    Stalin’s Baku Curve: A Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution by Fuad Akhundov A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Education Leadership Higher and Adult Education, OISE University of Toronto © Copyright by Fuad Akhundov 2016 Stalin’s Baku Curve: A Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution Fuad Akhundov Master of Arts in Education Leadership Higher and Adult Education, OISE University of Toronto 2016 Abstract The Stalin’s Baku Curve, a Detonating Mix of Crime and Revolution presents a brief insight into the early period of activities of one of the most ominous political figures of the 20th century – Joseph Stalin. The major emphasis of the work is made on Stalin’s period in Baku in 1902-1910. A rapidly growing industrial hub providing almost half of the world’s crude oil, Baku was in the meantime a brewery of revolutionary ideas. Heavily imbued with crime, corruption and ethnic tensions, the whole environment provided an excellent opportunity for Stalin to undergo his “revolutionary universities” through extortion, racketeering, revolutionary propaganda and substantial incarceration in Baku’s famous Bailov prison. Along with this, the Baku period brought Stalin into close contact with the then Russian secret police, Okhranka. This left an indelible imprint on Stalin’s character and ruling style as an irremovable leader of the Soviet empire for almost three decades. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work became possible due to the tremendous input of several scholars whom I want to hereby recognize. The first person I owe the paper Stalin’s Baku Curve, a Detonating Mix of Crime and Revolution to is Simon Sebag Montefiore, an indefatigable researcher of former Soviet and pre-Soviet history whom I had a pleasure of working with in Baku back in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccauley Stalinism the Thirties.Pdf
    Stalin and Stalinism SECOND EDITION MARTIN McCAULEY NNN w LONGMANLONDON AND NEW YORK The Thirties 25 and October 1929, and Stalin declared on 7 November 1929 that the great PART TWO: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS 2 THE movement towards collectivisation was under way [8]. The Politburo stated on 5 January 1930 that large-scale kulak production was to be replaced by large- scale kolkhoz production. Ominously, for the better-off farmers it also proclaimed the THIRTIES ‘liquidation of the kulaks as a class*. It was hoped that the collectivisation of the key grain-growing areas, the North Caucasus and the Volga region, would be completed by the spring of 1931 at the latest and the other grain-growing areas by the spring of 1932. A vital role in rapid collectivisation was played by the 25,000 workers who descended on the countryside to aid the ‘voluntary* process. The ‘twenty-five thousanders*, as they were called, brooked no opposition. They were all vying with one another for the approbation of the party. Officially, force was only permissible against kulaks, but the middle and poor peasants were soon sucked into the maelstrom of violence. Kulaks were expelled from their holdings and their POLITICS AND THE ECONOMY stock and implements handed over to the kolkboz. What was to become of them? Stalin was brutally frank: ‘It is ridiculous and foolish to talk at length After the war scare of 1927 [5] came the fear of foreign economic intervention. about dekulakisation. ... When the head is off, one does not grieve for the hair. Wrecking was taking place in several industries and crises had occurred in There is another question no less ridiculous: whether kulaks should be allowed to join the collective farms? Of course not, others — or so Stalin claimed in April 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • A Psychobiographical Study of Joseph Stalin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by South East Academic Libraries System (SEALS) A PSYCHOBIOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF JOSEPH STALIN Vuyiswa Matsolo Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Artium Psychology (Research) in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Nelson Mandela University April 2019 Supervisor: Dr. A. Sandison ii Photography of Joseph Stalin Source: Khlevniuk, 2015. iii Abstract Joseph Stalin was the dictator of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953. Stalin ruled by terror and millions of people died during his term as leader. Stalin was known as an evil man, however, he was also hailed as a hero who was able to transform Russia into a major super power. Stalin died in 1953 at the age of 74, after suffering a massive stroke. The aim of the current study was to explore and describe the personality development of Stalin, by applying Alfred Adler’s theory of Individual Psychology and Theodore Millon’s Biopsychosocial Model of Personality to the context of his life experiences. The research design is a psychobiography, which is a single case study, and non-probability purposive sampling was used to select Stalin. The data consisted of primary and secondary data sources that described Stalin’s life experiences, and Yin’s (1994) guidelines for data collection were followed for data collection, which include using multiple sources of evidence, creating a case study database, and keeping and maintaining a reliable chain of evidence. The data was analysed in accordance to Miles and Huberman’s (1994a) model of data analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Russian Women in the 1920S & 1930S
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 8-19-2015 Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s Marcelline Hutton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the European Languages and Societies Commons, Modern Art and Architecture Commons, Modern Literature Commons, Russian Literature Commons, Theatre and Performance Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hutton, Marcelline, "Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s" (2015). Zea E-Books. Book 31. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/31 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Marcelline Hutton Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s The stories of Russian educated women, peasants, prisoners, workers, wives, and mothers of the 1920s and 1930s show how work, marriage, family, religion, and even patriotism helped sustain them during harsh times. The Russian Revolution launched an economic and social upheaval that released peasant women from the control of traditional extended fam- ilies. It promised urban women equality and created opportunities for employment and higher education. Yet, the revolution did little to elim- inate Russian patriarchal culture, which continued to undermine wom- en’s social, sexual, economic, and political conditions. Divorce and abor- tion became more widespread, but birth control remained limited, and sexual liberation meant greater freedom for men than for women. The transformations that women needed to gain true equality were post- poned by the pov erty of the new state and the political agendas of lead- ers like Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin.
    [Show full text]
  • Oleg Khlevniuk, Stalin
    Book Reviews Oleg Khlevniuk. Translated by Nora Seligman Favorov. Stalin: New Biography of a Dictator. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015. Pp. xvi + 392. ISBN: 978-0-300-16388-9. Hardback $24.99. Eastern Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart wrote the following in his 2009 book Atheist Delusions: We live now in the wake of the most monstrously violent century in human history, during which the secular order (on both the political right and the political left), freed from the authority of religion, showed itself willing to kill on an unprecedented scale and the with an ease of conscience worse than merely depraved. If ever an age deserved to be thought an age of darkness, it is surely ours. One might almost be tempted to conclude that secular government is the one form of government that has shown itself too violent, capricious, and unprincipled to be trusted.1 How, then, can anyone today begin to come to grips with this terrifying reality? What would be the quickest way for busy Americans and others to get some kind of exposure to this nightmare called the twentieth century? Perhaps by reading a lucid account of recent socialist experiments, like Richard Pipes’ history of communism2—or better, Stalin: New Biography of a Dictator. Given its publisher (Yale) and the sheer number of conflicting biographies about Joseph Stalin, I was initially worried that this release might prove to be little more than an exercise in cloistered academic 1 David Bentley Hart, Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), 105-6.
    [Show full text]
  • Interwar Years - the Rise of Dictators Mrs
    Interwar Years - The Rise of Dictators Mrs. Wiedenheft’s Modern World History Day 1-2 Use the slides to answer the questions about the Crisis in the Weimar Republic. These slides are a mixture of postcards, political cartoons, and photographs. This is a look at Germany during the worldwide depression. Remember that Germany is responsible for paying reparations from WWI and is economically depressed as well. The last 2 slides are speeches made by candidates. Choose which candidate you would choose to make the nation better and explain in a paragraph (4-5 sentences) why you would vote for that candidate. After each class has voted, I will reveal the results as well as the names of the candidates. (p. 2-10) ​ Day 3-4 Create a presentation using Google Slides about the Rise of Dictators around Europe during the interwar years. Please see your instructions for specific guidelines and grading. If you are receiving paper assignments, you may complete this on construction paper or unlined paper. Please be creative, but make sure that you include all of the necessary information to receive the maximum amount of points. You may Google search for information, but make sure that you are putting everything into your own words and not copying and pasting. (p. 11-24) ​ Day 5 Read the article “Aggressors Invade Nations” and answer the questions. This is a great look at how powerless the League of Nations was to enforce the terms of the Treaty of Versailles as well as how aggression by dictators and appeasement led to WWII.
    [Show full text]
  • How Right-Wing Billionaires Infiltrated Higher Education
    • • • 28 THE CHRONICLE REVIEW How Right-Wing Billionaires Infiltrated Higher Education Chronicle Review illustration by Scott Seymour, original image by Randy Lyhus By Jane Mayer FEBRUARY 12, 2016 PREMIUM If there was a single event that galvanized conservative donors to try to wrest control of higher education in America, it might have been the uprising at Cornell University on April 20, 1969. That afternoon, during parents’ weekend at the Ithaca, N.Y., campus, some 80 black students marched in formation out of the student union, which they had seized, with their clenched fists held high in black-power salutes. To the shock of the genteel Ivy League community, several were brandishing guns. At the head of the formation was a student who called himself the "Minister of Defense" for Cornell’s Afro-American Society. Strapped across his chest, Pancho Villa-style, was a sash-like bandolier studded with bullet cartridges. Gripped nonchalantly in his right hand, with its butt resting on his hip, was a glistening rifle. Chin held high and sporting an Afro, goatee, and eyeglasses reminiscent of Malcolm X, he was the face of a drama so infamous it was regarded for years by conservatives such as David Horowitz as "the most disgraceful occurrence in the history of American higher education." John M. Olin, a multimillionaire industrialist, wasn’t there at Cornell, which was his alma mater, that weekend. He was traveling abroad. But as a former Cornell trustee, he could not have gone long without seeing the iconic photograph of the armed protesters. What came to be known as "the Picture" quickly ricocheted around the world, eventually going on to win that year’s Pulitzer Prize.
    [Show full text]