DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ukrainian Weekly 1960

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ukrainian Weekly 1960 WARNING: DICTATOR KHRUSHCHEV, THE GREATEST PERPETRATOR OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AGAIN DESECRATES AMERICAN SOIL! HANGMAN OF UKRAINE COMES TO THE UNITED NATit IS TO REVILE AMERICA AND SELL HIS GENOGIDAL PROPAGANDA THE PEOPLE vs. KHRUSHCHEV CRIMES OF KHRUSHCHEV HE WANTS TO BURY US! Editor's Note: The following chronological dates of Khrushchev's criminal deeds against the Ukrainian and other AGAINST THE UKRAINIAN peoples are extracted from Handbook for "Summit," compiled, documented and edited by SPX Research Associates in Washing­ PEOPLE ton for the Minute WonWn of the United States of America, Inc. on the basis of House Committee on Un-American Activities U. S. OFFICIAL DOCUMENT REVEALS HIS CRIMINAL Reports. 1-6, entitled, The Crimes of Khrushchev: ATTACKS ON UKRAINIANS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER WORLD WAR II Evidential Outline, Chronology of Criminal Record and Associations 1894 — Born, Kalinovka, United States in a pressured Kursk, Russia, parents agri­ reversal of established Amer­ cultural workers. Three years ican foreign policy. of grade school equivalence. Results of the man-made 1912 — Conscript, Russian famine in Ukraine: — Imperial Army. 4,800,000 human deaths. De­ 1917 (Summer) — Deserter; crease of resources: Horses —, returns to Kursk (Autumn) — 5.300,000 (1928), 2,600.000 The Revolution, (1933); Cattle — 8.600,000 1918 — Drafted in Red (1928). 4,400,000 (1933); — Army. Sheep — 8,100,000 . (1928), , 1920 (Oct.) — Khrushchev 2,000.000 (1933); Swine .— discharged from Red Army. A 7,000,000 (1928), 2,000,660 member.of the Cac party, goes (1933). to work in mines aa laborer. 1934 — Promoted to mem­ 1920 (Nov.) ~ Ukraine bership in CPSU Central Com­ seized by Moscow and Georgia mittee. Khrushchev, carries out j follows. Stalin'e errands to the point — Thousands and thousands of corpses of Khrushchev's victims 1921 — Year of the first where — . were uncovered in Ukraine. organized famine in Ukraine. 1935 -r- He is made Sec­ 1923 — Sent to Rob Fak retary of the District of Мов-1 Editor's Note: On September 0-11, 1959 the House Com­ vocational school; becomes cow. mittee on Un-American Activities under the presidency of the party secretary there. Purge of 80 percent of the Hon. Frnncis E. Walter of Pennsylvania, held extensive hear­ 1926 — Kv finishes voca- intellectuals in the Ukraine ings on the role and responsibility of Nikita S. Khrushchev in tional school: party work at- beginning with arrests of pro­ Stalin's inhuman and barbarous persecution of the Ukrainian tracts attention of bazar Ka fessors at Kharkov and Kiev people. Among those who gave their testimonies Were Dr. Lev ganovich, the old Bolshevik. sentencing to Vorkuta and E. Dobriansky. Petro Pavlovych, Dr. Ivan W. Malinin. Nicholas 1928 —In charge of organi­ obher slave camps. Prychodko. Constantin Konononko. Mykola Lebed, Dr. Gregory zational department of CP 1936 — Beginning of "The Kostiuk, Prof. Ivan Wowehuk and Yuriy Lawrynenko. All — AMERICAN OPINION district committee in Kiev. Yczhovshchina," purge of the With the exception of Dr. Dobriansky lived in Ukraine 1929 — Beginning of the Ku­ Thirties, which includes liqui­ and personally experienced Khrushchev's criminal rule. Ex­ lak liquidation. Kv goes to Mos­ dation of ChekiBt Yagoda, by cerpts from their testimonies follow: OF KHRUSHCHEV cow as protege of Kaganovich. his successor, Yczhov; Bukhn- Becomes secretary of CP or­ rin, Kamenev, Rykov and Dr. Lev E. Dobriansky Who is Nikita S. Khrushchev, posts for his skill in eliminat­ ganization in Promyshelnaya others. KHRUSHCHEV SAID . .. the man who wants to sit down ing enemies of the state. By Akaderaia, where Stalin's wife, 1937 — Khrushchev in Dr. Dobriansky: - The re- engaged in the murder of peo- and talk peace with the free 1944. according to the *rans- Nadezhda Alliluyeva, (whose speeches following the March cord of Khrushchev's crimes is pie like Kossior and others. "IF YOU DON'T LIKE US, DON'T ACCEPT world, the man who demands cript. Khrushchev was dis­ liquidation was later handled April expulsion of Rykov and І really the basis for his whole Countless others met death as OUR INVITATION AND DON'T INVITE US TO apologieB from the West for patched to Ukraine agam to by Kv) also was a party sec­ Bukharin by Plenum of Cen- political growth and ascension a result of Khrushchev's per­ COME TO SEE YOU. WHETHER YOU LIKE IT affronts to his sensitivities? deal with the resistance move­ retary and chairman of the tral Committee, calls for the in the Soviet Union. As a petration of these extensive OR NOT, HISTORY IS ON OUR SIDE. WE WILL Let the record of his deeds tell ment. Three survivors report local party committee at the annihilation of — matter of fact, it is the height purges. Yet. quite cynically, in BURY YOU." who he is. that at his orders the secret Academy. "all Trotskyites, Zlnovievites. of irony that we should be ex­ 1956 at the 20th party con­ gress he posthumously re­ (To Western diplomats at a Moscow reception, Nov. 18, 1956) When Khrushchev was in the police: 1930, Jan. 5. — Decree of enemies of the people, to the tending an invitation to a man habilitated the very people United States last fall Amer­ •"Cut into the skin and tore liquidation for Ukraine's peas­ last kin, so that there will re­ who, on the basis of fact and whom he had directly or in­ icans saw flashes of his mon­ the skin off living bodies." antry in which local Ukrainian main not even a memory be­ truth, is really the greatest . AND IKE REPLIED directly murdered. The purges strous temper, his grotesque "They also nailed people on party leaders and agents were hind them, and scatter them and most infamous genocidist made responsible for expropria­ to the winds!" alive today. The crimes of continued during the period of "Now, once again, we hear an expansionist figures of speech, his preoc­ the crosses. They cut out eyes, 4 the thirties to wipe out well cupation with death, his ap­ broke bones in legs and arms tion of the possessions of 500,- May-June — Thirteenth CP Khrushchev actually extend regime declaring, We will bury you!' over 400.000 Ukrainians. petite for violence. Then, at and extracted nails." 000 families or 2.000.000 per­ conference in Ukraine. from the early thirties down "In a bit of American vernacular — 'oh, yeah?" Third, as the first secretary the Paris summit meeting, his One witness before the com­ sons. Beginning of Ukrainian September — Stalin sends to the present day. of the Communist Party of Uk­ "Seriously, it would be a grave error not to take veil of pretence for peace and mittee said mass graves opened deportation, genocide and the commission to Ukraine, consist­ Mr. Arens. -- Do you pos­ raine, he was involved in the this kind of threat literally. This theme has been undqrstanding was ripped off. after a Khrushchev-directed man-made famine of the '30's. ing of MOlotov. Yezhov and sess basic evidence with respect heinous massacre of about communist doctrine for a hundred years. and he stood revealed full face. purge revealed 9.499 maimed 1931-32 —• While the Uk­ Khrushchev, with orders to to these crimes? 9.500 Ukrainians in Vynnytsia. The real Khrushchev was and mutilated bodies. rainian famine is being fashion­ liquidate the leadership of the Dr. Dobriansky. - Yes. I "You will recall that there was once a dictator known long before. The file of As premier of all Russians. ed in Moscow and Kiev for party and the Ukrainian par­ myself, of course, had not wit­ Fourth, during the war, as named Hitler who also said he would bury us. He the House Committee on Un- Khrushchev was confronted in "population control and the liament. nessed these crimes. But on the a security general in the NK­ wrote a long dull book telling precisely how he was american Activities are cram­ 1956 with a Hungarian free­ suppression of unrest," Khru­ Kossior, Lubchenko and Pet- basis of my socioeconomic VD. he exploited the Com­ going to do it. Not enough people took him at his med full of the testimony of dom uprising, the first to con­ shchev, as the protege of Ka­ rovsky to be "eliminated"; Kv studies and. of course, individ­ munist partisans primarily to word. those who were eye-witnesses test his authority. His reaction ganovich. is first secretary of installed, but — ual consultations with many provoke German occupying to his rise to power in Rus­ was similar to his performance the Baumanovskii District and Plenum of Ukraine Centni! witnesses who have been in forces into augmenting their "We shall not make that mistake again." sia. They began their account in Ukraine: then of the Krasnopresnenskii committee rejects Kv. so Vynnytsia, Ukraine, and else- repressions and persecutions (Radio-TV address, Oklahoma City. Nov. 13, 1957) with the year 1930 when 1. 30.000 Hungarians were District. When Kaganovich be­ Entire membership of Uk-| where, these crimes .stack up of the Ukrainian populace. Khrushchev was trying to killed during and after the re­ comes Commissar of Railroads rainian government trapped by in a rather staggering way. Much of the populace was in ORDER OF UKRAINIAN DEMONSTRATIONS prove to Stalin his fitness to volt. Kv 3ucceds as head of the Mos­ NKVD "social occasion." I should like very quickly to favor, for a time, of German AOALNST KHRUSHCHEV cow City party and then of liberation. Seeing one alien to­ become a member of the Cent­ 2. He ordered the deporta­ Of 60 members of Ukrainian recount them in a methodical ral Committee. His proving- tion of 12,000 to the Soviet the Moscow Province party.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’S Only First Lady
    Outraging the People by Stepping out of the Shadows Gender roles, the ‘feminine ideal’ and gender discourse in the Soviet Union and Raisa Gorbacheva, the Soviet Union’s only First Lady. Noraly Terbijhe Master Thesis MA Russian & Eurasian Studies Leiden University January 2020, Leiden Everywhere in the civilised world, the position, the rights and obligations of a wife of the head of state are more or less determined. For instance, I found out that the President’s wife in the White House has special staff to assist her in preforming her duties. She even has her own ‘territory’ and office in one wing of the White House. As it turns out, I as the First Lady had only one tradition to be proud of, the lack of any right to an official public existence.1 Raisa Maximovna Gorbacheva (1991) 1 Translated into English from Russian. From: Raisa Gorbacheva, Ya Nadeyus’ (Moscow 1991) 162. 1 Table of contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Gender roles and discourse in Russia and the USSR ................................................................. 17 The supportive comrade ................................................................................................................. 19 The hardworking mother ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cannibalism in Stalin's Russia and Mao's China*
    East European Quarterly, XLI, No. 2 June 2007 CANNIBALISM IN STALIN'S RUSSIA AND MAO'S CHINA* Steven Bela Vdrdy Agnes Huszar Vardy Duquesne University We have already published a number of scholarly studies about the horrors of the slave labor camps in the Soviet Gulag.' We have also written several newspaper articles on this topic for various Hungarian and Hungarian-American publications.^ But we have not as yet explored specifically the presence of cannibalism in these slave labor camps, which appears to have been a rather widespread phenomenon. Development ofthe Soviet Gulag The roots of the Soviet Gulag reach back to the Bolshevik Revolu- tion of 1917, and more specifically to the secret police organization, the Cheka, established and directed until his death by the Polish renegade, Felix Dzerzhinski (1877-1926). The first of such camps was established in 1918 in the Solovesky Monastery on the Solovki Island ofthe White Sea, when that remote monastery and much of that small island was transformed into a slave labor camp. The goal was to collect the repre- sentatives of the old Czarist regime, and either "reeducate" or extermi- nate them as potential opponents to the Soviet regime. In this monastery, and in the scores of temporary shelters established after 1918 on that island, about twenty thousand political prisoners perished during the 1920s under the most gruesome circumstances. The creation of this "death camp" on Solovki Island in 1918 was soon followed by the establishment of many hundreds, and later many thousands of such camps throughout the Soviet Union. In 1934 a special organization, the Glavnoy Upravneliye LAGerey [GULAG] (Chief Ad- ministration of Labor Camps), was established specifically to administer this network of forced labor camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalin's Baku Curve: a Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution
    Stalin’s Baku Curve: A Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution by Fuad Akhundov A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Education Leadership Higher and Adult Education, OISE University of Toronto © Copyright by Fuad Akhundov 2016 Stalin’s Baku Curve: A Detonating Mixture of Crime and Revolution Fuad Akhundov Master of Arts in Education Leadership Higher and Adult Education, OISE University of Toronto 2016 Abstract The Stalin’s Baku Curve, a Detonating Mix of Crime and Revolution presents a brief insight into the early period of activities of one of the most ominous political figures of the 20th century – Joseph Stalin. The major emphasis of the work is made on Stalin’s period in Baku in 1902-1910. A rapidly growing industrial hub providing almost half of the world’s crude oil, Baku was in the meantime a brewery of revolutionary ideas. Heavily imbued with crime, corruption and ethnic tensions, the whole environment provided an excellent opportunity for Stalin to undergo his “revolutionary universities” through extortion, racketeering, revolutionary propaganda and substantial incarceration in Baku’s famous Bailov prison. Along with this, the Baku period brought Stalin into close contact with the then Russian secret police, Okhranka. This left an indelible imprint on Stalin’s character and ruling style as an irremovable leader of the Soviet empire for almost three decades. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work became possible due to the tremendous input of several scholars whom I want to hereby recognize. The first person I owe the paper Stalin’s Baku Curve, a Detonating Mix of Crime and Revolution to is Simon Sebag Montefiore, an indefatigable researcher of former Soviet and pre-Soviet history whom I had a pleasure of working with in Baku back in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccauley Stalinism the Thirties.Pdf
    Stalin and Stalinism SECOND EDITION MARTIN McCAULEY NNN w LONGMANLONDON AND NEW YORK The Thirties 25 and October 1929, and Stalin declared on 7 November 1929 that the great PART TWO: DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS 2 THE movement towards collectivisation was under way [8]. The Politburo stated on 5 January 1930 that large-scale kulak production was to be replaced by large- scale kolkhoz production. Ominously, for the better-off farmers it also proclaimed the THIRTIES ‘liquidation of the kulaks as a class*. It was hoped that the collectivisation of the key grain-growing areas, the North Caucasus and the Volga region, would be completed by the spring of 1931 at the latest and the other grain-growing areas by the spring of 1932. A vital role in rapid collectivisation was played by the 25,000 workers who descended on the countryside to aid the ‘voluntary* process. The ‘twenty-five thousanders*, as they were called, brooked no opposition. They were all vying with one another for the approbation of the party. Officially, force was only permissible against kulaks, but the middle and poor peasants were soon sucked into the maelstrom of violence. Kulaks were expelled from their holdings and their POLITICS AND THE ECONOMY stock and implements handed over to the kolkboz. What was to become of them? Stalin was brutally frank: ‘It is ridiculous and foolish to talk at length After the war scare of 1927 [5] came the fear of foreign economic intervention. about dekulakisation. ... When the head is off, one does not grieve for the hair. Wrecking was taking place in several industries and crises had occurred in There is another question no less ridiculous: whether kulaks should be allowed to join the collective farms? Of course not, others — or so Stalin claimed in April 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • A Psychobiographical Study of Joseph Stalin
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by South East Academic Libraries System (SEALS) A PSYCHOBIOGRAPHICAL STUDY OF JOSEPH STALIN Vuyiswa Matsolo Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Artium Psychology (Research) in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Nelson Mandela University April 2019 Supervisor: Dr. A. Sandison ii Photography of Joseph Stalin Source: Khlevniuk, 2015. iii Abstract Joseph Stalin was the dictator of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953. Stalin ruled by terror and millions of people died during his term as leader. Stalin was known as an evil man, however, he was also hailed as a hero who was able to transform Russia into a major super power. Stalin died in 1953 at the age of 74, after suffering a massive stroke. The aim of the current study was to explore and describe the personality development of Stalin, by applying Alfred Adler’s theory of Individual Psychology and Theodore Millon’s Biopsychosocial Model of Personality to the context of his life experiences. The research design is a psychobiography, which is a single case study, and non-probability purposive sampling was used to select Stalin. The data consisted of primary and secondary data sources that described Stalin’s life experiences, and Yin’s (1994) guidelines for data collection were followed for data collection, which include using multiple sources of evidence, creating a case study database, and keeping and maintaining a reliable chain of evidence. The data was analysed in accordance to Miles and Huberman’s (1994a) model of data analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Russian Women in the 1920S & 1930S
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 8-19-2015 Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s Marcelline Hutton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Part of the European Languages and Societies Commons, Modern Art and Architecture Commons, Modern Literature Commons, Russian Literature Commons, Theatre and Performance Studies Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hutton, Marcelline, "Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s" (2015). Zea E-Books. Book 31. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/31 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Marcelline Hutton Resilient Russian Women in the 1920s & 1930s The stories of Russian educated women, peasants, prisoners, workers, wives, and mothers of the 1920s and 1930s show how work, marriage, family, religion, and even patriotism helped sustain them during harsh times. The Russian Revolution launched an economic and social upheaval that released peasant women from the control of traditional extended fam- ilies. It promised urban women equality and created opportunities for employment and higher education. Yet, the revolution did little to elim- inate Russian patriarchal culture, which continued to undermine wom- en’s social, sexual, economic, and political conditions. Divorce and abor- tion became more widespread, but birth control remained limited, and sexual liberation meant greater freedom for men than for women. The transformations that women needed to gain true equality were post- poned by the pov erty of the new state and the political agendas of lead- ers like Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.1 Winter 2014 Inside+Covers.Pdf
    Volume 7 Issue 1 Winter 2014 A Journal of Georgetown University’s Tocqueville Forum on the Roots of American Democracy Editor-in-Chief Hannah Schneider Executive Editor Jordan Rudinsky Managing Editor Christina Eickenroht Section Editors Amanda Wynter (The Forum) ZongXian Eugene Ang (The Chamber) Andrew Schilling (The Archive) Michael Lessman (The Sanctuary) Christina Eickenroht (The Parlor) George Prugh (The Clock Tower) Utraque Unum Georgetown University’s seal is based directly on the Great Seal of the United States of America. Instead of an olive branch and arrows in the Amer- ican eagle’s right and left talons, Georgetown’s eagle is clutching a globe and calipers in its right talon and a cross in its left talon. The American seal’s eagle holds a banner in its beak that states, E Pluribus Unum, or “Out of Many, One”, in reference to the many different people and states creating a union. The Georgetown seal’s eagle holds a banner in its beak that states, Utraque Unum. As the official motto of Georgetown University, Utraque Unum is often translated as “Both One” or “Both and One” and is taken from Paul’s epistle to the Ephesians. This motto is found in a Latin translation of Ephesians 2:14: ipse est enim pax nostra qui fecit utraque unum. The King James Version of the Bible says, “For He [Christ] is our peace, who hath made both one”. Utraque Unum is the Latin phrase to describe Paul’s concept of unity between Jews and Gentiles; that through Jesus Christ both are one. In view of the Georgetown seal, the motto represents pursuing knowledge of the earthly (the world and calipers) and the spiritual (the cross).
    [Show full text]
  • Oleg Khlevniuk, Stalin
    Book Reviews Oleg Khlevniuk. Translated by Nora Seligman Favorov. Stalin: New Biography of a Dictator. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015. Pp. xvi + 392. ISBN: 978-0-300-16388-9. Hardback $24.99. Eastern Orthodox theologian David Bentley Hart wrote the following in his 2009 book Atheist Delusions: We live now in the wake of the most monstrously violent century in human history, during which the secular order (on both the political right and the political left), freed from the authority of religion, showed itself willing to kill on an unprecedented scale and the with an ease of conscience worse than merely depraved. If ever an age deserved to be thought an age of darkness, it is surely ours. One might almost be tempted to conclude that secular government is the one form of government that has shown itself too violent, capricious, and unprincipled to be trusted.1 How, then, can anyone today begin to come to grips with this terrifying reality? What would be the quickest way for busy Americans and others to get some kind of exposure to this nightmare called the twentieth century? Perhaps by reading a lucid account of recent socialist experiments, like Richard Pipes’ history of communism2—or better, Stalin: New Biography of a Dictator. Given its publisher (Yale) and the sheer number of conflicting biographies about Joseph Stalin, I was initially worried that this release might prove to be little more than an exercise in cloistered academic 1 David Bentley Hart, Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), 105-6.
    [Show full text]
  • Interwar Years - the Rise of Dictators Mrs
    Interwar Years - The Rise of Dictators Mrs. Wiedenheft’s Modern World History Day 1-2 Use the slides to answer the questions about the Crisis in the Weimar Republic. These slides are a mixture of postcards, political cartoons, and photographs. This is a look at Germany during the worldwide depression. Remember that Germany is responsible for paying reparations from WWI and is economically depressed as well. The last 2 slides are speeches made by candidates. Choose which candidate you would choose to make the nation better and explain in a paragraph (4-5 sentences) why you would vote for that candidate. After each class has voted, I will reveal the results as well as the names of the candidates. (p. 2-10) ​ Day 3-4 Create a presentation using Google Slides about the Rise of Dictators around Europe during the interwar years. Please see your instructions for specific guidelines and grading. If you are receiving paper assignments, you may complete this on construction paper or unlined paper. Please be creative, but make sure that you include all of the necessary information to receive the maximum amount of points. You may Google search for information, but make sure that you are putting everything into your own words and not copying and pasting. (p. 11-24) ​ Day 5 Read the article “Aggressors Invade Nations” and answer the questions. This is a great look at how powerless the League of Nations was to enforce the terms of the Treaty of Versailles as well as how aggression by dictators and appeasement led to WWII.
    [Show full text]
  • (Svetlana Alliluyeva) Papers (1989) Summary: the Lana Peters Papers
    AMHERST CENTER FOR RUSSIAN CULTURE Lana Peters (Svetlana Alliluyeva) Papers (1989) Summary: The Lana Peters Papers contain correspondence belonging to Lana Peters (Svetlana Alliluyeva) (1926-2011), daughter of Soviet premier Josef Stalin, émigré, and writer; they are primarily focused on the exchanges between Peters, Thomas Whitney, and Helen Brann (Peters’ literary agent) concerning the potential publication of the two final volumes of Peters’ memoirs. Quantity: 1 linear foot Containers: 1 record storage box Processed: November – December 2011 By: Cathrina Altimari-Brown, Center Assistant Listed: By: Finding Aid: December 2011 Prepared by: Cathrina Altimari-Brown, Russian Center Assistant Edited by: Stanley Rabinowitz, Director, Center for Russian Culture Access: There is no restriction on access to the Lana Peters Papers for research use. Particularly fragile items may be restricted for preservation purposes. Copyright: Requests for permission to publish material from the Lana Peters Papers should be directed to the Director of the Amherst Center for Russian Culture. It is the responsibility of the researcher to identify and satisfy the holders of all copyrights. Lana Peters (Svetlana Alliluyeva) Papers INTRODUCTION Historical Note Svetlana Iosifovna Stalina, later known as Svetlana Alliluyeva and Lana Peters, was born in Moscow on February 28th, 1926; she was the youngest child of Soviet Premier Josef Stalin and his second wife Nadezhda Alliluyeva. Nadezhda Alliluyeva’s death on November 9, 1932, when Svetlana was six, was officially said to have been caused by peritonitis but was rumored to have either been suicide or murder ordered by the Kremlin and even, possibly, by Stalin himself. As a child Svetlana was famous throughout the USSR, and Stalin reportedly treated her with tenderness, at least until her teenage years.
    [Show full text]
  • A História Dos Líderes Da Segunda Guerra Mundial
    Miguel Mendes de Almeida A história dos líderes da Segunda Guerra Mundial ESCOLA DE EDUCAÇÃO BÁSICA DA URI CAMPUS SANTIAGO 2018 A história dos líderes da Segunda Guerra Mundial Miguel Mendes de Almeida Projeto “Nascem Poetas e Escritores” - 7º Ano - Coordenação do Projeto: Prof.ª Esp. Ana Maria Brum Diretora: Prof.ª Maria Luiza Tamiosso Machado Vice-Diretora: Prof.ª Roselaine Lehnhardt Lamberti Coordenação Pedagógica: Prof.ª Lia Amaral Diagramação: Prof.ª Luciane Machado Fraga ESCOLA DE EDUCAÇÃO BÁSICA DA URI CAMPUS SANTIAGO 2018 Miguel Mendes de Almeida Escola da URI A História dos líderes da Segunda Guerra Mundial Sumário Introdução ............................................................. 7 Capítulo 1 : Winston Churchill ........................... 10 Infância .............................................................. 12 Vida adulta......................................................... 14 A carreira política ............................................... 15 Produção literária .............................................. 18 Capítulo 2: Benito Mussolini .............................. 24 Origens .............................................................. 27 Infância .............................................................. 29 Emigração para a Suíça .................................... 31 Jornalista político ............................................... 32 Ruptura com os socialistas ................................ 34 Carreira política e ditadura ................................ 35 Invasão de outros países e Segunda
    [Show full text]
  • PERESTROIKA—A NEW STAGE in SOVIET REFORM by GREGORY FELTON B.A. University of British Columbia, 1979 a THESIS SUBMITTED IN
    PERESTROIKA—A NEW STAGE IN SOVIET REFORM By GREGORY FELTON B.A. University of British Columbia, 1979 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 1988 (£) Gregory Felton, 1988 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of IhuTlCA/. Sdl&Mtf The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date DE-6(3/81) i ABSTRACT Perestroika, unlike previous attempts at economic reform, represents the beginning of a new era in post-war Soviet politics. If one were to categorize the major Soviet leaders since Stalin it would be more accurate to term Khrushchev a liberal Stalinist, Brezhnev a conservative Stalinist, and Gorbachev, may be properly classified as an anti-Stalinist. Gorbachev's accession to power represents the beginning of what might be termed post-post-Stalin reform. To illustrate the uniqueness of perestroika, this thesis is structured around a comparison of Gorbachev's economic, political, and social reforms with those of Nikita Khrushchev.
    [Show full text]