DOCSLIB.ORG

Finnish Report on Nuclear Safety. Finnish 7Th National Report As Referred to in Article 5 of the Convention on Nuclear Safety

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finnish Report on Nuclear Safety. Finnish 7Th National Report As Referred to in Article 5 of the Convention on Nuclear Safety STUK-B 205 / JULY 2016 B Finnish report on nuclear safety Finnish 7th national report as referred to in Article 5 of the Convention on Nuclear Safety Säteilyturvakeskus Strålsäkerhetscentralen Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority STUK-B 205 / JULY 2016 Finnish report on nuclear safety Finnish 7th national report as referred to in Article 5 of the Convention on Nuclear Safety STUK • SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS Osoite/Address • Laippatie 4, 00880 Helsinki STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN Postiosoite / Postal address • PL / P.O.Box 14, FIN-00881 Helsinki, FINLAND RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Puh./Tel. (09) 759 881, +358 9 759 881 • Fax (09) 759 88 500, +358 9 759 88 500 • www.stuk.fi STUK-B 205 ISBN 978-952-309-329-4 (print) Erweko Oy, Helsinki/Finland 2016 ISBN 978-952-309-330-0 (pdf) ISSN 0781-1713 2 STUK-B 205 Finnish report on nuclear safety. Finnish 7th national report as referred to in Article 5 of the Convention on Nuclear Safety. STUK-B 205. Helsinki 2015. 86 pp. + Annexes 42 pp. Keywords: national report, Convention on Nuclear Safety, Finland Executive summary Finland signed on 20 September 1994 the Convention on Nuclear Safety which was adopted on 17 June 1994 in the Vienna Diplomatic Conference. The Convention was ratified on 5 January 1996, and it came into force in Finland on 24 October 1996. This report is the Finnish National Report for the Seventh Review Meeting in March/April 2017. There are two nuclear power plants operating in Finland: the Loviisa and Olkiluoto plants. The Loviisa plant comprises of two PWR units (pressurised water reactors, of VVER type), operated by Fortum Power and Heat Oy, and the Olkiluoto plant two BWR units (boiling water reactors), operated by Teollisuuden Voima Oyj. In addition, a new nuclear power plant unit (PWR) is under construction at the Olkiluoto site. At both sites there are interim storages for spent fuel as well as disposal facilities for low and intermediate level nuclear wastes. Posiva, a joint company by Fortum and TVO, submitted a construction licence application for the spent nuclear fuel repository in the end of 2012. The construction licence was granted for Posiva by the Government in November 2015. Finland is currently reviewing a construction licence application for Fennovoima Hanhikivi unit 1 in Pyhäjoki (VVER type design). Since the review is underway, Hanhikivi unit 1 is discussed in this report mainly with regard to the licensing process and siting (see Articles 7 and 17 and Annex 5). Furthermore, there is a Triga Mark II research reactor, FiR 1 in Espoo licensed to VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd. The operating licence for the research reactor FiR 1 is valid until the end of 2023. However, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd has decided to shut down and decommission the reactor earlier due to economical reasons. This will be the first decommissioned nuclear facility in Finland representing a new challenge for the utility and the regulatory body. In this report, latest development in the various topics of the Convention on Nuclear Safety is described. Major safety reviews and plant modernisations are explained including safety assessment methods and key results. Safety performance of the Finnish nuclear power plants is also presented by using representative indicators. Finnish regulatory practices in licensing, provision of regulatory guidance, safety assessment, inspection and enforcement are also covered. Major developments in Finland since the Sixth Review Meeting are as follows: updating of legislative and regulatory framework, implementation of the renewed regulatory guides at the operating nuclear power plants completed, periodic safety review carried out at the Loviisa nuclear power plant in 2015-2016, and IRRS follow-up mission (IAEA’s Integrated Regulatory Review Service) carried out in Finland. Furthermore, construction of the new nuclear power plant unit continued and progressed to the operating licence phase, one 3 STUK-B 205 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY new unit has entered into construction licence phase and construction licence for Olkiluoto Spent Nuclear Fuel encapsulation and disposal facility was granted. Latest development in the various topics of the Convention on Nuclear Safety is described in relevant articles. Finland continues the hosting and participation in the international peer reviews and the Government of Finland has requested the IAEA to carry out four OSART missions in Finland between 2017–2022: • Olkiluoto 1&2 OSART mission will be conducted from 27 February until 16 March 2017 • Loviisa NPP OSART mission would take place in March 2018. • Pre-Operational OSART mission for Olkiluoto 3 before the first fuel loading (according to current schedule in April 2018) • Pre-Operational OSART mission for Fennovoima (Hanhikivi unit 1) would take place in 2022. In the report, the implementation of each of the Articles 6 to 19 of the Convention is separately evaluated. Based on the evaluation, the following features emphasising Finnish safety management practices in the field of nuclear safety can be concluded: • During the recent years Finnish legislation and regulatory guidance have been further developed and the revision of regulatory guide system was finalised in 2013. The overall revision of the regulatory guides took into account international guidance such as IAEA safety standards and WENRA (Western European Regulators’ Association) safety reference levels for existing reactors and safety objectives for new reactors. In addition, the lessons learnt from the TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi accident are taken into account. No deviation from the convention obligations has been identified in the Finnish regulatory infrastructure including nuclear and radiation safety regulations. • The revised regulatory guides were published at the end of 2013. The revised guides are applied as such for new nuclear facilities. For the existing facilities and facilities under construction separate facility specific implementation decisions are made. In the end of 2014 the licensees of operating NPPs submitted to STUK assessments on the fulfilment of the revised regulatory guides. In 2015, STUK evaluated the assessments and made decisions on how to further improve safety. Regular update and implementation of regulatory guides, particularly with regard to nuclear power plants in operation, are unique measures on the international perspective. • The licensees have shown good safety performance and rigorous safety management practices in carrying out their safety related responsibilities in the operation and modernisation of existing NPPs. During recent years, only minor operational events (INES 1 and below) have taken place and no major safety problems have appeared. The licensees’ practices are considered to comply with the Convention obligations. • Safety assessment is a continuous process and living full scope level 1 and 2 probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) practices are effectively used for the further development of safety. Periodic safety review of the Loviisa plant was carried out in 2015–2016, and the periodic safety review of the Olkiluoto plant was carried out in 2007–2009. The decisions how to apply the revised regulatory guides at the operating NPPs were made by STUK in 2015. Several plant modifications have been carried out at the operating NPPs during the recent years to further improve the safety. Some of these modifications are originating from the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. • The resources of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) have been increased to meet the needs to oversee the construction of the new plants in Finland. The reports of the recent IRRS mission and follow-up mission have been published on STUK’s website and mission results have been and will be used to further improve 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STUK-B 205 regulatory guidance and practices. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd supports effectively the regulatory body in the safety assessment work providing safety analysis capabilities and tools and performing safety analyses. There are also national research programmes which support and develop the competencies in nuclear safety and waste management of VTT as well as in the universities participating in the research programmes. • The Nuclear Energy Act was amended in 2015. The Act was revised to broaden STUK’s legal mandate to issue binding regulations. This was one of the recommendations from IRRS mission to Finland in 2012. Based on the amended Act, STUK published the new binding regulations concerning nuclear safety, security, emergency preparedness and waste management, as well as uranium and thorium mining in the beginning of 2016. Furthermore, based on changes in the Act the Government has to take into account the proposals included in the STUK’s statements when considering the conditions of the Decision-in-Principle and licences for nuclear facilities. • In January 2013 the Ministry of Employment and the Economy set up a working group to prepare a research and development strategy for the safe use of nuclear energy. The working group emphasized the importance of the research in the competence building. The Ministry of the Employment and Economy has started the implementation of the recommendations. In 2015 the Nuclear Energy Act was changed to ensure the financing for the enhancement of the nuclear safety research infrastructure. The Sixth Review Meeting in 2014 identified some challenges and recorded some planned measures to improve nuclear safety in Finland. These issues are included and responded
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finland 242 Finland Finland
    FINLAND 242 FINLAND FINLAND 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. General Overview Finland (in Finnish Suomi) is a republic in northern Europe, bounded on the north by Norway, on the east by Russia, on the south by the Gulf of Finland and Estonia, on the south-west by the Baltic Sea and on the west by the Gulf of Bothnia and Sweden. Nearly one third of the country lies north of 2 2 the Arctic Circle. The area of Finland, including 31 557 km of inland water, totals 338 000 km . The terrain is generally level, hilly areas are more prominent in the north and mountains are found only in the extreme north-west. The average July temperature in the capital Helsinki on the southern coast is 17 °C. The February average in Helsinki is about -5.7 °C. The corresponding figures at Sodankylä (Lapland) in the northern Finland are 14.1 °C and -13.6 °C. Precipitation (snow and rain) averages about 460 mm in the north and 710 mm in the south. Snow covers the ground for four to five months a year in the south, and about seven months in the north. Finland has a population of 5.16 million (1998) and average population density of 17 per km2 of land. Historical population data is shown in Table 1. The predicted annual population growth rate between the years 1998 and 2010 is 0.21 %. More than two thirds of the population reside in the southern third of the country. In Finland the total primary energy consumption1 per capita was about 60 % higher than the European Union average (according to 1996 statistics) and about 35 % higher than the OECD average.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Options in Electricity Production-Finnish Experience
    6th International Conference on Nuclear Option in Countries with Small • Dubr°Vr HR0600024 Nuclear Option in Electricity Production - Finnish Experience Antti Piirto TVO Nuclear Services Ltd 27160 Olkiluoto, Finland [email protected] Nuclear energy has played a key role in Finnish electricity production since the beginning of the 1980s. The load factors of nuclear power plants have been high, radioactive emissions low and the price of nuclear electricity competitive. In addition, detailed plans exist for the final disposal of nuclear waste as well as for the financing of final disposal, and the implementation of final disposal has already been started with the authorities regulating nuclear waste management arrangements at all levels. Deregulation of the electricity market has meant increasing trade and co-operation, with both the other Nordic countries and the other EU Member States. In May 2002, the Finnish Parliament approved the application for a decision in principle on the construction of the fifth nuclear power plant unit in Finland. In December 2003, Teollisuuden Voima Oy concluded an agreement for the supply of the new nuclear power plant unit with a consortium formed by the French- German Framatome ANP and the German Siemens. The new unit, which will be built at Olkiluoto, is a pressurised water reactor having a net electrical output of about 1600 MW. The total value of the project is ca. 3 billion Euros, including investments connected with the development of infrastructure and waste management. The objective is to connect the new unit to the national grid in 2009. When in operation, the unit will increase the share of nuclear energy of Finnish electricity consumption, currently some 26%, to a little more than one third, and decrease Finnish carbon dioxide emissions by more than 10%.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe
    Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy www.psocommons.org/rhcpp Vol. 1: Iss. 4, Article 3 (2010) Waiting for the Nuclear Renaissance: Exploring the Nexus of Expansion and Disposal in Europe Robert Darst, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth Jane I. Dawson, Connecticut College Abstract This article focuses on the growing prospects for a nuclear power renaissance in Europe. While accepting the conventional wisdom that the incipient renaissance is being driven by climate change and energy security concerns, we argue that it would not be possible without the pioneering work of Sweden and Finland in providing a technological and sociopolitical solution to the industry’s longstanding “Achilles’ heel”: the safe, permanent, and locally acceptable disposal of high-level radioactive waste. In this article, we track the long decline and sudden resurgence of nuclear power in Europe, examining the correlation between the fortunes of the industry and the emergence of the Swedish model for addressing the nuclear waste problem. Through an in-depth exploration of the evolution of the siting model initiated in Sweden and adopted and successfully implemented in Finland, we emphasize the importance of transparency, trust, volunteerism, and “nuclear oases”: locations already host to substantial nuclear facilities. Climate change and concerns about energy independence and security have all opened the door for a revival of nuclear power in Europe and elsewhere, but we argue that without the solution to the nuclear waste quandary pioneered by Sweden and Finland, the industry would still be waiting for the nuclear renaissance. Keywords: high-level radioactive waste, permanent nuclear waste disposal, nuclear power in Europe, nuclear politics in Finland and Sweden © 2010 Policy Studies Organization Published by Berkeley Electronic Press - 49 - Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland's Legal Preparedness for International Disaster Response
    HOST NATION SUPPORT GUIDELINES Finland’s legal preparedness for international disaster response – Host Nation Support Guidelines Finnish Red Cross 2014 Report on the regulation of the reception of international aid in Finland ECHO/SUB/2012/638451 The report is part of the project titled ”Implementation of the EU Host Nation Support Guidelines”, (ECHO/SUB/2012/638451) The project is funded by the Civil Protection Financial Instrument of the European Union for 2013– 2014, provided by the European Community Humanitarian Office (ECHO) Author: Maarit Pimiä, Bachelor of Laws Mandators: The Finnish Red Cross, National Preparedness Unit The Department of Rescue Services of the Ministry of the Interior Translated by: Semantix Finland Oy Date: 14.3.2014 © Finnish Red Cross The European Commission is not responsible for the content of this report or the views expressed in this report. The authors are responsible for the content. 2 Report on the regulation of the reception of international aid in Finland ECHO/SUB/2012/638451 Contents Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 6 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Background of the report .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments of Nuclear Power in Finland: Olkiluoto 3, and More…
    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF NUCLEAR POWER IN FINLAND: OLKILUOTO 3, AND MORE… Jarmo Vehmas 15th REFORM Group meeting Schloss Leopoldskron, Salzburg, 10.9.2010 CONTENT 1. Olkiluoto 3: Basics 2. Olkiluoto 3: About TVO 3. Olkiluoto 3: Delays 4. Olkiluoto 3: Financing and increasing costs 5. Olkiluoto 3. Conclusions 6. Government decision-in-principle, June/July 2010 7. Fennovoima: Shareholders 8. Fennovoima: Site alternatives 9. Olkiluoto 4 and Fennovoima: Conclusions OLKILUOTO 3: BASICS • Fifth nuclear reactor in Finland, ordered by TVO, a private power company • TVO already has two units, taken into use in 1978 (OL 1) and 1982 (OL 2). State-owned Fortum has two units in Loviisa, taken into use in 1977 and 1981 • Attemps for a fifth unit were made ijointly by Fortum and TVO in mid-1980s (cancelled after Chernobyl), in early 1990s (rejected in 1993 by the Parliament), • TVO submitted the OL 3 application in 2000 and it was accepted by the Government and ratified by the Parliament in 2002. • OL 3 is a new plant design, European pressurized reactor (EPR) by AREVA, 4300/1600 MW • The construction license was granted and construction started in 2005. • Original scedule and budget: In commercial operation in 2009, turnkey contract of €3.2 bn 2. OLKILUOTO 3: ABOUT TVO • Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO), is a Finnish power company which produces electricity to its shareholders only. • According to its articles of association, TVO shareholders pay fixed costs in relation to their shares of the stock, and receive corresponding right to the produced electricity. • TVO Shareholders pay the moving cost in relation to their use of the produced electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing Nuclear Power
    NUKLEARMALAYSIA / P /2013/1 Financing Nuclear Power By: Sheriffah Noor Khamseah Al-Idid bt Dato’ Syed Ahmad Idid Malaysia @ Nuclear Power Asia 2013 15-16 January 2013 Shangri-La Hotel, Kuala Lumpur 2013 BANGI, 43000, KAJANG, MALAYSIA AGENSI NUKLEAR MALAYSIA (NUKLEAR MALAYSIA) BANGI, 43000, KAJANG, MALAYSIA Acc. No :2862 Financing Nuclear Power @ Nuclear Power Asia 2013 15-16 January 2013 Shangri-La Hotel, Kuala Lumpur By: Sheriffah Noor Khamseah Al-Idid bt Dato’ Syed Ahmad Idid Malaysia CONTENTS 1 Cost Components for Financing Nuclear Power Plants- An Overview 2 Cost Estimates of Nuclear Power Plants 3 Key Challenges for Financing Nuclear Power 4 Financing Structures and Its Changing Dynamics 5 Sources for Financing Nuclear Power 6 Banks financing Nuclear Power 7 Export Credit Agencies (ECA 8 Financing of Nuclear Power Plants by Government 9 Financing of Nuclear Power Plants by Private Companies – The Finnish Experience (OKILUOTO 3) 10 New Financing Models – Loan Guarantees –USA 11 New Financing Models – Foreign equity Participation – Taishan ( CGNPC & EDF ) 12 Recommendations 1. Cost Components for a Nuclear Power Project - An Overview 2. Cost Estimates of Nuclear Power Plants Cost of Nuclear Power Plants $ 2 $ 4 Overnight costs: the cost of a construction project if no interest was incurred during construction, as if the project was completed "overnight Cost of Nuclear Power Plants Figure III shows the overnight costs for both the completed plants and the projections for future plants. The estimates are roughly equally divided between government consultants, utilities, government entities, utilities, and Wall Street/independent analysts, plus a small number of academic institutions. The "great bandwagon market" for By 2008,projected costs nuclear reactors comprised were three to four times Construction delays and cost overruns, higher than the initial cost as well as regulatory changes which projections in 2001-2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Finland's Dependence on Russian Energy—Mutually Beneficial Trade
    sustainability Article Finland’s Dependence on Russian Energy—Mutually Beneficial Trade Relations or an Energy Security Threat? Jaakko J. Jääskeläinen 1, Sakari Höysniemi 2,* , Sanna Syri 1 and Veli-Pekka Tynkkynen 2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Aalto University, P.O. Box 14100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland; jaakko.j.jaaskelainen@aalto.fi (J.J.J.); sanna.syri@aalto.fi (S.S.) 2 Aleksanteri Institute, Faculty of Arts, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 24, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland; veli-pekka.tynkkynen@helsinki.fi * Correspondence: sakari.hoysniemi@helsinki.fi; Tel.: +358-50-3148944 Received: 31 August 2018; Accepted: 25 September 2018; Published: 27 September 2018 Abstract: Studies on energy security in the context of relations between European Union (EU) and Russia tend to focus on cases, with an open conflict related to supply, such as “hard” energy weapons, or on only one fuel, often natural gas. However, there is a need to understand the long-term impacts that energy relations have politically, economically and physically, and their linkages between resilience, sustainability and security. We analyse the Finnish-Russian energy relations as a case study, as they are characterised by a non-conflictual relationship. To assess this complex relationship, we apply the interdependence framework to analyse both the energy systems and energy strategies of Finland and Russia, and the energy security issues related to the notable import dependence on one supplier. Moreover, we analyse the plausible development of the energy trade between the countries in three different energy policy scenarios until 2040. The findings of the article shed light on how the trends in energy markets, climate change mitigation and broader societal and political trends could influence Russia’s energy trade relations with countries, such as Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Suomen EU-Politiikan Muutos Ja Jatkuvuus
    Reunalla vai ytimessä? Suomen EU-politiikan muutos ja jatkuvuus Toimittaneet Tapio Raunio & Juho Saari Reunalla vai ytimessä? Suomen EU-politiikan muutos ja jatkuvuus Toimittaneet Tapio Raunio & Juho Saari Julkaistu yhteistyössä ulkoasiainministeriön Eurooppatiedotuksen kanssa Copyright © 2017 tekijät, Gaudeamus Helsinki University Press ja ulkoasiainministeriön Eurooppatiedotus Gaudeamus Oy www.gaudeamus.fi Kansi: Kari Puikkonen KL 32.51 • UDK 327 *4#/ QEG SISÄLLYS Esipuhe ..................................................7 1 Johdanto: onko konsensuksen aika ohi?.....................9 Tapio Raunio & Juho Saari 2 Kriittiset mutta uskolliset suomalaiset: kansalaisten EU-asenteet jäsenyyden aikana............................26 Maria Bäck 3 Kun yksituumaisuus murenee: EU-politiikan kansallinen valmistelu ja päätöksenteko ...............................52 Tapio Raunio & Mikko Mattila 4 Suomalainen talouspolitiikka EMU-ajan kriiseissä: mallioppilaasta keskitason suorittajaksi .................... 71 Jaakko Kiander 5 Varauksellinen Suomi: eurooppalaistuva sosiaalipolitiikka. 95 Juho Saari 6 Naturasta biotalouteen: Suomi eurooppalaisen ympäristöpolitiikan tekijänä .............................124 Rauno Sairinen & Tuula Teräväinen 7 Kansallista konsensusta: Suomen maatalouden selviytyminen EU-aikana................................149 Ilkka P. Laurila & Jyrki Niemi 8 Ulko- ja turvallisuuspolitiikka: pinnallista jatkuvuutta ja pyörteisiä pohjavirtauksia .............................170 Hanna Ojanen & Kristi Raik 9 Harmiton ja vain harvoin uutiskynnyksen
    [Show full text]
  • Main Grid Development Plan 2019–2030
    Content Summary Introduction Background Changes in the operating environment Main grid development plan A summary of main grid investments 1 Main grid development plan 2019–2030 Fingrid Delivers. Responsibly. Main grid development plan Content Summary Introduction Background Changes in the operating environment Main grid development plan A summary of main grid investments 2 Contents The power system revolution poses a challenge for the design of the main grid 3 Development of the regional grid 41 The Lapland planning area 42 Summary 4 The Sea-Lapland planning area 44 The Oulu region planning area 46 Introduction 7 The Kainuu planning area 48 The Ostrobothnia planning area 50 Changes in the operating environment and future outlooks 8 The Central Finland planning area 52 Climate Change Mitigation 9 The Savonia-Karelia planning area 54 Development prospects of electricity consumption 10 The Pori and Rauma region planning area 56 Development prospects for electricity generation and storage 13 The Häme planning area 58 Forecasts 15 The Southwest Finland planning area 60 The Southeast Finland planning area 62 Background of the development plan 16 The Uusimaa planning area 64 Development of the main grid 17 Fingrid’s main grid and the Finnish electricity transmission system 18 A summary of main grid investments 66 Corporate responsibility 19 Grid development process 24 Maintenance of the main grid 30 Technological choices of the electricity transmission system 32 Fingrid’s ten-year main grid development plan 35 Development of the main power transmission grid 36 Development of cross-border capacity 38 Main grid development plan Content Summary Introduction Background Changes in the operating environment Main grid development plan A summary of main grid investments 3 The power system revolution poses a challenge for the planning of the main grid The previous few years have been extraordinary for main to the line that no longer carries meshed transfers.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Rim Economies Quarterly Review
    Baltic Rim Economies Quarterly Review ISSUE NO. 3, 31 OCTOBER 2011 EXPERT ARTICLES: Eero Heinäluoma: The Nordic-Baltic cooperation Page 1 Guido Westerwelle: The importance of the Baltic Sea region for Germany – priorities of the German presidency of the Council of Baltic Sea States (CBSS) 2011/2012 Page 2 Ingrid Nestle: Germany’s future energy policy Page 3 Mikko Pukkinen: Finnish business and the Baltic Sea region Page 4 Timo Rajakangas: Instead of three no’s it is four aye’s that apply to the EUSBSR Page 5 Sten Nordin: Stockholm calls for greater commitment to the well-being of the Baltic Sea Page 6 Vladimir Kuzin: Post crisis economic growth in Kaliningrad region Page 7 Andrey Klemeshev: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University as an example of EU-Russia cooperation Page 8 Bernard Lammek: The University of Gdańsk – the largest institution of higher education in Northern Poland Page 9 Edgar Öhberg: The importance of fishery Page 10 Mika Vehviläinen: The Baltic Boutique and the future of air travel Page 11 Anneli Pauli: EU-Russia cooperation in promoting innovation Page 12 Riitta Mustonen: Significance of international activities to the research system Page 13 Michael Schlicht and Marion Mienert: German-Russian collaboration in research and innovation Page 15 Vladimir V. Okrepilov: Economic development based on the economics for quality Page 16 Frank Schauff: Russia-EU partnership for modernisation – words and reality Page 17 Oleg Luksha: Russian Technology Transfer Network – gate to Russia’s innovations Page 18 Igor Kuprienko: Finnish-Russian Innovation Centre – main results of activities Page 19 Turo Uskali: Innovation and journalism – convergence Page 20 EXPERT ARTICLES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE To receive a free copy, print or register at www.tse.fi/pei Baltic Rim Economies Quarterly Review ISSUE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy and the Current Security Environment in the Era of Hybrid Threats
    Research Report Nuclear energy and the current security environment in the era RESEARCH AND ANALYISIS RESEARCH of hybrid threats 86/57/0/16 Research Report Nuclear energy and the current security environment in the era of hybrid threats 86/57/0/16 Hybrid CoE Research Reports are thorough, in-depth studies commissioned by Hybrid CoE, or products of joint Hybrid CoE projects. These reports aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of issues relevant to hybrid threats. They either provide relevant policy recommendations or other practical conclusions, and include new research with relevant references. Hybrid CoE provides feedback on the reports before their publication. The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats tel. +358 400 253800 www.hybridcoe.fi ISBN 978-952-7282-24-3 October 2019 Hybrid CoE is an international hub for practitioners and experts, building member states’ and institutions’ capabilities and enhancing EU-NATO cooperation in countering hybrid threats located in Helsinki, Finland. Preface With the rising prominence and increased under- includes cost-effective solutions to support military standing of hybrid threats, it can be foreseen that requirements, energy efficiency in the operational those seeking to challenge democratic states will field, and interaction with academia and industry look for new ways to deploy national power to (ENSEC COE, 2019). further their own strategic interests. Could nuclear Insights into the cyber field were provided by energy be used as one of the strategic tools in the NATO accredited Cooperative Cyber Defence hybrid threat activity for geopolitical aims? As this Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE), established in question has received insufficient attention to date, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Suomen Akatemia VALTA-OHJELMAN HANKKEIDEN
    Suomen Akatemia VALTA-OHJELMAN HANKKEIDEN TULOKSET Syyskuu 2010 Petteri Pietikäinen VALTA-ohjelman ohjelmapäällikkö HANKKEET: Huom: Kaikkien hankkeiden tulokset eivät ole vielä tässä – tiedosto päivitetään syksyllä 2010 1. Eriksson, Marja (Tampereen yliopisto): Johtajuus, valta ja pelko 2. Heiskala, Risto (Jyväskylän yliopisto): Valtaeliitit ja vallan käsitteet: suomalaisen markkinaregiimin hallinta 3. Heiskanen, Tuula (Tampereen yliopisto): Monimuotoisuus ja valta sukupuolittuneissa organisaatioissa: Työpaikat ja sukupuolten välinen tasa-arvo 4. Helkama, Klaus (Helsingin yliopisto): Valta Suomen metsä- ja luonnonsuojelupolitiikassa kansalaisten mieltämänä: poliittisen psykologian sovellus 5. Hyyryläinen, Torsti (Helsingin yliopisto, Ruralia -instituutti): Hajautettu hallinta ja valta maaseutupolitiikan verkostoissa (VALTA-ohjelman liitännäisjäsen) 6. Karvonen, Lauri (Åbo Akademi): Medborgarmakt i representativ demokrati 7. Kauppi, Niilo (Helsingin yliopisto): Kilpailuyhteiskunnan hallinta – suomalainen markkinavalta vertailevasta näkökulmasta: Poliittiset instituutiot 8. Kivikuru, Ullamaija (Helsingin yliopisto): Medier, medborgarskap och maktens kretser 9. Kraus, Peter (Helsingin yliopisto): Valtaa haastamassa: Etnisten ja kansallisten vähemmistöjen tasa-arvo, moninaisuus ja integraatio Suomessa 10. Lapintie, Kimmo (Teknillinen Korkeakoulu): Tieto/valta kaupunkikehityksessä 11. Lassila, Jukka (ETLA): Eläkejärjestelmä ja valta 12. Lehtonen, Mikko (Tampereen yliopisto): Kulttuurin valta ja hyväksynnän tuottaminen 13. Nousiainen, Kevät
    [Show full text]